No Extension Planned For State Of Emergency In Armenian Capital

NO EXTENSION PLANNED FOR STATE OF EMERGENCY IN ARMENIAN CAPITAL

RIA Novosti
March 20 2008
Russia

YEREVAN, March 20 (RIA Novosti) – Armenian President Robert Kocharyan
has announced that the state of emergency imposed in the country’s
capital, Yerevan, on March 1 will not be extended after it expires
at midnight.

"I can see no reason to extend the state of emergency in Yerevan.

>From tomorrow the capital of our republic will see a normal state
of affairs, not a state of emergency," the outgoing president told
a news conference on Thursday.

Kocharyan declared a state of emergency in Yerevan after protests
over allegedly rigged presidential polls turned violent.

Eight people were killed and over 130 wounded in the city in clashes
between police and supporters of Levon Ter-Petrosyan, who was defeated
by Prime Minister Serzh Sarkisyan in the February 19 vote.

Sarkisyan denied earlier this month that the polls were rigged in
his favor, insisting that he had won the presidential elections fairly.

"I believe that I won an honest victory at the presidential elections,
all the more so as I had earlier received the people’s trust at the
parliamentary election [in May 2007]," he said.

Sarkisyan gained 52.8% of the vote against Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s 21.5%.

BAKU: Russia, France Did Their Best To Prevent Resolution On Nagorno

RUSSIA, FRANCE DID THEIR BEST TO PREVENT RESOLUTION ON NAGORNO-KARABAKH FROM PASSING IN UN – AMBASSADOR

Trend News Agency
March 19 2008
Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan, Baku, 18 March /TrendNews corr S. Agayeva/ Azerbaijan’s
Ambassador to UN Agshin Mehdiyev’s interview at TrendCapital:

Question: Several days ago, UN General Assembly passed a Resolution
on the Situation in the Occupied Territory of Azerbaijan. Would you
comment on the document, as well as on its passing?

Answer: First of all, so far no international organization has ever
passed such a comprehensive and at the same time such a concrete
document on the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict. The main regulations
of the Resolution are the following: approval of the leadership
of the principle on the territorial integrity and sovereignty
of Azerbaijan; no parallels or clauses connected with some other
principles and norms of the international law are made; requirement
for all Armenian armed forces to immediately and unconditionally
withdraw from the occupied Azerbaijani territories… Previously,
Armenians used to say that other international documents mention the
occupying forces but very vaguely, and the armed forces of Armenia
are not implied. This Resolution concerns all the occupying forces
without any exception or omissions. The document again confirms the
right of all refugees and IDPs to return to their own native lands,
shows impossibility of accepting the status-quo- the regime which
emerged from occupation of Azerbaijan’s territory by Armenia as
normal and legal by the international community, reflects support
to the efforts of the international intermediaries, mainly the OSCE
Minsk Group, and finally, the document suggests to the UN Secretary
General to develop a special report and to deliver it at the 63rd
session of the UN General Assembly. Moreover, the General Assembly
recommends putting this issue on the agenda of the 63rd session.

As to passing of the Resolution, the UN General Assembly is the main
and the largest intergovernmental and inter-state forum in the world.

General Assembly’s decisions reflect the position of the international
community on some issue. In this case, the General Assembly has
outlined the further settlement- the way the international community
sees it. To put this other way, we have our principles of settling
the conflict and new ones should not be invented.

Question: Armenians say that the decision of UN General Assembly is
just recommendation, but not mandatory which means that it is possible
not to follow them.

Answer: You are absolutely right. They could not have acted
otherwise. You did not expect Armenians to congratulate you on the
next diplomatic victory, did you? I think we must attach importance
not to the Armenian reaction, but to that of the world community,
because precisely it has created political and juridical basis for
the settlement. And the latter is clearly indicated in Resolution
of UN General Assembly. Remember that the co-chairmen of OSCE Minsk
Group, U.S., Russia and France worked against our interests and
voted against the resolution. Furthermore, even if Americans had
not tried to hinder us, the French and Russian would have done their
best to create obstacles for the adoption of the Resolution. As we
have been informed, under Russian and French pressure, some countries
had to revise their positions at the last moment and to refrain from
voting for the Resolution. The same occurred among the EU members who
expressed their support for us, including the members of notorious
Russia and Collective Security Treaty Organization, and political
satellites of Russia. I would like especially to point out the
position of Uzbekistan- who voted in favour of us. Doubtless, the
fact that majority of the member states of Organization of Islamic
Conference and GUAM voted for Resolution is noteworthy. I can cite
dozens of such examples. I would not condemn those who voted against
the resolution. You know, not all the countries are able to pursue
an independent foreign policy as Azerbaijan and withstand the pressure.

Simply, taking into consideration the condition under which the
Resolution fought its way through and the way the countries took
part in the voting, we will have to make certain corrections to
our relations with some countries. By the way, you may be informed
later on that after the voting representatives of several countries
phoned us and said that they could not take part in the voting due to
some technical reasons. And Iran sent a written notification to the
Secretariat of the General Assembly saying that the country planed
to support the Resolution. The relevant information about these facts
will be indicated in the official documents of the General Assembly.

In general, we could foresee the development of the situation, and
therefore, decided to put the document for voting. It is noteworthy
that three weeks have already passed since the draft resolution was
officially introduced and approved in the General Assembly. It is
unprecedented case! It is some kind of ‘Blitzkrieg Diplomacy’. We
would achieve our goal.

Question: And what about the Minsk group co-chairmen? They state that
the Resolution indicates not all of their proposals and the Resolution
is ‘unbalanced’.

Answer: I can not assess the work of Minsk group co-chairmen,
but I think that they had made a serious mistake voting against
the resolution. They were not able to change the situation; no one
supported them except India, Angola and Vanuatu. I think now everyone
asks the same question: Is it possible to work with them after all
this?! As to their statements which say that the Resolution does not
indicate all of their proposals and it is unbalanced are groundless.

The Resolution is a document of the UN General Assembly and only 7
of 146 countries, taking part in the voting, voted against it. And it
cannot be balanced, since there can not be a balance between aggressor
and the victim of aggression. If they did not like the Resolution,
they could have made relevant statements by disclosing their positions
and could have refrained from voting or not to vote at all, but not
by taking an obvious pro-Armenian position! It is obvious that their
advisers did their best. Just for the sake of justice, it should be
mentioned that we were informed that Americans did not want to vote
against it until the last minute and tried to avoid such a decision,
but obviously, the French and Russians made them to do it.

Question: What can you say about Kosovo? Is there any connection
between Kosovo and Karabakh? Can any parallels be drawn? Is it
appropriate to speak about any effect of the Kosovo-related events
on Azerbaijan’s actions in the UN?

Answer: Kosovo in no way can be a precedent for Karabakh. The key
difference is that the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan is
two countries’ conflict- in which one country- Armenia, relying upon
the assistance and direct help of the third country, mercenaries and
international terrorism groups occupied the territory of another
sovereign country- Azerbaijan, and tries to annex the occupied
territories under different pretexts. The occupants develop minerals
in the Azerbaijani territory and misappropriate the revenues; they
plundered the belongings of the Azerbaijani IDPs; they take measures
to change the demographic situation in the occupied territory, and
finally, destroying the cultural and historical heritage- with that
they are trying to remove all traces conforming the belongingness of
the land to Azerbaijanis. That is a territorial inter-state conflict
with occupation and attempt of annexation. Any self-determination is
completely irrelevant here.

If somebody wants to draw some parallels, I would compare the actions
by Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh with the actions of Nazis during the
World War II. The Danzig corridor resembles the Lachin corridor; the
Sudet Germans resemble Karabakh’s Armenians; the racial superiority of
Aryans resembles exclusiveness of Armenians; Anschluss and Miatsum,
anti-Azerbaijani and anti-Turkish statements by the representatives
of Armenia’s political elite and Goebbels’ propaganda. Are these not
alike? I think it is. But one should remember how the Aryans ended.

Question: So now, what are the further plans?

Answer: There are some plans and outlines, but everything has its due
time. And now, we have to complete our work over the GUAM resolution,
develop the Secretary General’s report which is mentioned in the
Resolution.

NA Special Sitting Of Acception Of Post Of Ra President To Be Held A

NA SPECIAL SITTING OF ACCEPTION OF POST OF RA PRESIDENT TO BE HELD AT 14:00 ON APRIL 9

Noyan Tapan
March 18, 2008

YEREVAN, MARCH 18, NOYAN TAPAN. The special sitting of the RA National
Assembly of the acception of the post of the RA President will be
held in the building of the Opera and Ballet National Academic Theatre
at 14:00 on April 9. This decision was made by the National Assembly
with 85 votes for, 5 against and 1 abstaning in the March 18 regular
sitting. The members of the Zharangutiun (Heritage) faction were
against the decision and independent MP Viktor Dalakian abstaining.

According to the same decision of the National Assembly, the regular
four-day sittings scheduled for April 9 will not be held.

BAKU: Kazakhstan’s Ambassador To Azerbaijan: "Kazakhstan Always Supp

KAZAKHSTAN’S AMBASSADOR TO AZERBAIJAN: "KAZAKHSTAN ALWAYS SUPPORTS TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY OF AZERBAIJAN"

Today
olitics/43796.html
March 18 2008
Azerbaijan

"We always support territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and peaceful
resolution of Nagorno Karabakh conflict".

The due announcement was made by Kazakhstan’s ambassador to Azerbaijan
Serik Primbetov.

Touching upon Kazakhstan’s demonstration of neutral position on the
resolution, adopted by the UN General Assembly, the ambassador noted
that despite that, our friendly relations between the two countries
will always exist-this is a priority and they are more important than
any resolutions.

"Kazakhstan has repeatedly taken part in the missions on the peaceful
resolution of the said problem and I think the world community will
find the way out of this situation", Primbetov said.

He noted that Kazakhstan is for the friendly relations both with
Azerbaijan and Armenia.

"I will do everything possible for strengthening friendly relations
between our peoples", the Kazakh ambassador said.

http://www.today.az/news/p

Joint Statement on Recent Events in Armenia

PRESS RELEASE
Armenian Assembly of America Armenian General Benevolent Union (AGBU)
122 C Street, NW, Suite 350 55 East 59th Street
Washington, DC 20001 New York, NY 10022
Contact: John De Trana Contact: Lana Kazangian
Tel: (202) 393-3434 Tel: (212) 319-6383
Fax: (202) 638-4904 Fax: (212) 319-6507
E-mail: [email protected] Web:
Web: Email: [email protected]

Western Diocese of the Armenian Church of America
3325 North Glenoaks Blvd.
Burbank, Ca 91504
Tel: 818-558-7474
Fax: 818-558-6333
Web:

Diocese of the Armenian Church of America
630 Second Avenue, New York, NY 10016
Contact: Chris Zakian
Tel: (212) 686-0710
Fax: (212) 779-3558
Web:
Email: [email protected]

Western Prelacy of the Armenian Apost. Church of America
H.E. Archbishop Moushegh Mardirossian
Prelate, Western United States
6252 Honolulu Avenue
La Crescenta, 91214
Tel: 818-248-7737/8
Fax: 818-248-7745
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:

Eastern Prelacy of the Armenian Apost. Church of America and Canada
H.E. Archbishop Oshagan Choloyan
Prelate, Easter Prelacy and Canada
138 East 39th Street
New York, NY 10016
Tel: 212-689-7810
Fax: 212-689-7168
Web:
Email: [email protected]

Joint Statement of the Armenian Assembly of America, the Armenian General
Benevolent Union, the Armenian National Committee of America, the Diocese of
the Armenian Church of America (Eastern/Western) and the Prelacy of the
Armenian Apostolic Church of America (Eastern/ Western) on Recent Events in
Armenia

As leading Armenian American organizations, we stand in solidarity with the
state and the people of Armenia as the nation confronts the current
political crisis.

We are deeply saddened by the violence, divisiveness, and deaths during the
post-electoral street unrest in the capital and extend our heartfelt
sympathies to all the families of the victims. We condemn all violent acts,
including assaults, vandalism, and looting, and expect, consistent with due
process of law, that the organizers and perpetrators will be brought to
justice.

We urge all parties to work peacefully within Armenia’s civic and legal
structures to address their outstanding differences and restore Armenia’s
political environment to a state of normalcy in as timely and responsible a
manner as possible. We join with all Armenians in reaffirming our people’s
common commitment to the security of Armenia and Artsakh in a challenging
and often dangerous region, and to cooperate toward our shared aim of
strengthening an open and democratic Armenian homeland, based upon the rule
of law, social and economic justice, freedom of expression and the media,
and equal opportunity for all.

As Armenian Americans, proud and vital partners in the future of the
Armenian nation, we are ready to cooperate with the newly-elected President
and the government. We remain committed to doing our part to serve our
homeland and the Armenian Nation as we have done throughout our long
history. Armenia will continue to inspire and sustain generations of
Armenians who have lived, as we do today, beyond her borders.

http://www.agbu.org/
http://www.aaainc.org/
http://www.armenianchurchwd.com/
http://www.armenianchurch.org/
http://www.westernprelacy.org/
http://www.armprelacy.org/

Turkey: Trial For "Insulting Turkishness" Still Hounding Converts

TURKEY: TRIAL FOR "INSULTING TURKISHNESS" STILL HOUNDING CONVERTS

Compass Direct News
lead&lang=en&length=long&idelement=528 9
March 17 2008
CA

In spite of EU pressure, revision of Article 301 appears at a
standstill.

SILIVRI, Turkey, March 17 (Compass Direct News) – In an effort to
prolong the trial of two Turkish converts to Christianity accused
of "denigrating Islam and Turkishness," three gendarme soldiers
on Thursday (March 13) were summoned to testify before the Silivri
Criminal Court in northwestern Turkey as witnesses for the prosecution
– which has yet to provide any evidence for its case.

Turan Topal and Hakan Tastan, who were searched, detained and then
charged in October 2006 under Turkey’s controversial Article 301
restricting freedom of speech, have been on trial for 18 months. The
case was further delayed Thursday when two witnesses summoned to
testify failed to show up, although at least one of them had been in
the corridor of the courthouse just before the session started.

Accordingly, the judge ordered that prosecution witnesses Kemal
Kalyoncu and Emin Demirci be brought "forcibly" to the next hearing,
set for June 24.

Testimony is also expected at the June hearing from an additional
three gendarme soldiers in Silivri, as well as three from the Istanbul
Gendarme Headquarters.

"From our side, we can say that the outcome of the hearing was
positive," defense lawyer Haydar Polat told Compass. "The witnesses
simply confirmed what happened in their investigation, without
producing any evidence whatever of the charges against my clients."

But on the negative side, Polat said, "All these new witnesses are
unnecessary."

The state prosecutor had called for the Christians’ acquittal last
July, noting that the youthful plaintiffs in the case had given
contradictory testimonies and no credible evidence had been produced to
prove the charges. But the new judge assigned to the case in November
accepted prosecution lawyer demands to call another dozen witnesses
to testify.

"Of course our clients are distressed by this," Polat told Compass,
noting that the two Christians are being required to attend and hear
the new prosecution witnesses, some of whom deliberately fail to
appear in court. "All these extra witnesses are being called simply
for the purpose of prolonging the case. There is no other purpose."

The three soldiers from the Silivri Gendarme Headquarters testified
separately to their involvement in searching the defendants’ homes
and office on October 11, 2006, when they said they found a large
number of Bibles and Christian documents, as well as several computers.

One of the soldiers said that at the time of their court-ordered
investigation, military intelligence officers had shown them
an organizational chart, listing names of alleged leaders of the
detained Christians’ group, which is accused of conducting illegal
religious activities.

Although the Christians’ trial in Silivri is officially held in
"open" court, the current judge has refused to admit any Turkish or
international press to observe the last two hearings.

Divine Delay

Defendant Topal told Compass that as he drank tea with several police
officers on duty at the courthouse during the hour-long delay for
yesterday’s hearing to begin, they asked him why he had left Islam
and become a Christian.

"They insisted that I was being ‘used’ by Christian missionaries,
that they were paying me lots of money to do this," Topal said. "I
explained that I came to faith 17 years ago all by myself, reading
the New Testament, without knowing any other Christian in Turkey."

Topal told them that he was not getting rich, and that if they believed
otherwise they could visit him in his one-room flat in Istanbul.

"Of course, they think I have somehow broken the law," Topal said.

"So I just told them that I am not doing anything that is illegal,
because under the democratic laws of Turkey, everyone is free to
practice and witness about his personal faith."

Prosecution Lawyer Jailed

Although six local attorneys for the prosecution were present at
the March 13 hearing, the ultranationalist lawyer leading their team
since the case opened in November 2006 was notably absent.

Prosecution attorney Kemal Kerincsiz has been jailed since mid-January
on charges of direct involvement in the criminal "Ergenekon" gang
suspected of instigating a string of unsolved murders over the past
two decades.

Another jailed Ergenekon suspect, Sevgi Erenerol, had accompanied
Kerincsiz to all the previous Silivri hearings against Topal and
Tastan. Erenerol was the spokesperson for the so-called Turkish
Orthodox Church, a bogus institution which reportedly became a front
for laundering the cash for assassination hits engineered by Ergenekon.

According to Turkish media reports, the Ergenekon gang had a direct
hand in the murder of three Christians in Malatya last April, as well
as the assassinations of an Italian priest in Trabzon in February
2006 and an Armenian editor in January 2007.

Kerincsiz had gained national notoriety since May 2005, when he began
to open cases against well-known Turkish academics, journalists and
intellectuals under Article 301 provisions.

301 Changes ‘Shelved Indefinitely’

A senior member of the European Parliament declared last month that
the European Union was losing patience with Turkey’s ruling Justice
and Development Party (AKP) over its failure to change the restrictive
Article 301.

"We’re preparing a report for the European Parliament which will be
voted on in April," Joost Lagendijk told the British Broadcasting
Corporation on February 11. "If nothing has moved by then on freedom
of expression, the report will be negative."

Turkey’s prime minister, justice minister and president have declared
repeatedly over the past two years that amending the law was both
needful and "high on their agenda."

But last week AKP deputy Nihat Ergun admitted that although a revised
draft of Article 301 was completed, it had been shelved indefinitely.

"I don’t know exactly when it will be brought up [in Parliament],"
Ergun told Today’s Zaman newspaper last Tuesday (March 11).

Reportedly this reflects accommodations to the opposition Nationalist
Movement Party, which supported the AKP’s recent constitutional
amendment to allow headscarves on university campuses but opposes
making any changes to Article 301.

Nevertheless, Foreign Minister Ali Babacan claimed on Channel 7
television yesterday that "in a very short time" the AKP government’s
proposed amendments to Article 301 would be brought before the
Turkish Parliament.

Babacan said that after the Foundations Law, Article 301 was the second
most important package of political reforms now pending in Turkey.

Deputy Prime Minister Cemil Cicek and other senior AKP members have
insisted that there is nothing wrong with the current law. Instead,
they say, the state simply needs to educate its prosecutors and judges
regarding free speech issues.

Angered by ongoing criticism of his stance, Cicek claimed in a January
10 interview, "Article 301 is not my personal issue. And 301 is not
a problem for anyone in Turkey."

"Tell that to Rakel’s face!" shouted a banner headline in Taraf
newspaper the next morning. Rakel Dink’s husband, Armenian Christian
journalist Hrant Dink, was assassinated in January 2007 while under
trial for several alleged violations of Article 301.

Proposed AKP changes in Article 301, such as reducing the maximum
sentence from three to two years in prison and requiring prosecutors
to get the Justice Minister’s permission to file charges, have been
labeled "cosmetic" by their critics, who demand the law be abolished
completely.

"What the AKP is proposing as ‘reform’ in that contentious article
is not reform at all, but an attempt to deceive," Turkish Daily News
editor Yusuf Kanli wrote in a January 9 editorial.

"Hrant was killed and scores of other Turkish intellectuals were
harassed and made targets under that Penal Code clause," Kanli said.

"We would prefer to see this contentious article erased … all
together."

http://compassdirect.org/en/display.php?page=

Are People Afraid Of Accepting Bribe?

ARE PEOPLE AFRAID OF ACCEPTING BRIBE?

KarabakhOpen
17-03-2008 10:18:27

"Something is happening in the countries. In all shops, as soon as you
buy something, they give you a receipt. Nurses do not accept bribes. We
tried to pay for injection, they refused," a middle-aged woman either
complained or expressed satisfaction. The woman sitting next to her in
the bus agreed but said "if you give the right way, they will accept".

It is evident that in Karabakh they are afraid of accepting bribes. It
does not mean, of course, that they do not accept it at all but it is
important that the process has started. In addition, it has started
at all the levels.

We have learned that the president has met with the "main actors"
in various spheres of life which are believed to be the most corrupt.

The main sphere where one can make millions is perhaps
construction. They can "earn" in all its stages: project, earthwork,
construction, decoration. In the absence of coordination and control
one can receive money for the same project for several times from
various funds. For instance, it is possible to use second hand
materials and present them as new.

Over the past few weeks the top government of the country has met
with the heads of the construction companies and government agencies
which coordinate investments. The details of the meeting are not
known but according to the official news release the participants of
the consultation were warned to stop breaches.

Similar meetings were held with the heads of the major trade companies
which were strictly instructed to "show" the real turnover. Moreover,
again according to unofficial information, tax sanctions were imposed
on some major wholesale companies. There has also been a warning of
more sanctions.

Battle on corruption has involved the law enforcement agencies as well.

District policemen refuse bribes and carefully deal with wrongdoers.

Battle has not reached the judiciary (at least, there are no loud
signals).

The suspension of powers of the Supreme Court justice Nairi Hakobyan
is hardly part of this battle. The decree of the president states
that he will be appointed to another position.

The anti-corruption movement is obvious in all the spheres of life.

Law-abiding citizens approve the actions of the government. "I
run a small construction company. I pay all the taxes. It is true
that income is not big but I believe that the law should not be
broken. I was amazed when I read the list of major taxpayers in
the Azat Artsakh. My company was among the top twenty. Meanwhile,
the companies whose immense turnover is seen with the naked eye are
somewhere in the back," says the owner of the construction company.

"I think it is impossible to work without breaches in the current tax
system. If they "show" all, they may come off the loser. First it is
necessary to improve the system then to demand from people. At every
trifle you have to pay a fine, you have to make millions of statements,
the accountant does not know whom to consult for the right form of
the statement. Laws change every month. Nothing will change unless
everything is put into order," says the owner of a chain of shops.

"It is good that the government has launched battle on corruption.

Apparently, it is serious if they do not write about it in
newspapers. If the president did it just for the sake of a show,
he would have staged a "demo" and it would be over. But it is done
internally. It would be good to know who is dismissed and for what,
who breaches and how is punished. Although I understand that the
town is small, perhaps they do not want people to be disgraced,"
said an official of a government agency in a talk.

"This battle cannot be arbitrary, you may, the other may not. Otherwise
nothing will come out of it. Everyone will shake their heads and say
it is a mere redistribution of property – they will take it from me
and give it to another," said the other interlocutor.

BAKU: Top Azeri diplomat hails UN resolution, attacks NK mediators

Day.Az, Azerbaijan
March 15 2008

TOP AZERI DIPLOMAT HAILS UN RESOLUTION, ATTACKS KARABAKH MEDIATORS

A senior Azerbaijani diplomat has praised the UN General Assembly
resolution calling for Armenian withdrawal from Azerbaijan’s occupied
territories as an important and timely document.

"We think that a very important document has been adopted. This
document has legal and political force,"the Azerbaijani website
Day.az and Turan news agency quoted Deputy Foreign Minister Araz
Azimov as saying.

"We put forward this resolution in a timely manner," following
Kosovo’s declaration of independencefrom Serbia. "Hereby, the General
Assembly confirmed Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity again,"
Azimovsaid.

The UN General Assembly on 14 March approved the resolution demanding
that all Armenian forces pull out ofAzerbaijan’s breakaway region of
Nagornyy Karabakh and surrounding districts.

"Yesterday’s vote and discussions allow us to say that the
international community has expressed itsposition very clearly. And
Armenia should realize that there are certain principles and norms,"
Azimov said.

The Azerbaijani diplomat said that the resolution was a "serious
warning" to the USA, Russia and France -the co-chairs of the OSCE
Minsk Group mediating a peaceful resolution of the conflict.

All three countries voted against the Azerbaijani-drafted resolution.

"The co-chairs have placed themselves in a very difficult situation,"
Azimov said. "They should haveno doubt that from now on, work with
them will be carried out on the basis of principles adopted by the UN
GeneralAssembly."

Azimov accused the USA, Russia and France of establishing a
"monopoly" on the settlement process and hintedthat Azerbaijan might
want Turkey or Germany to become co-chairs of the Minsk Group.

"Having established a monopoly on the resolution of the conflict
within the framework of the Minsk Group, theco-chairs perhaps feel
very comfortable. We will certainly continue working with the
co-chairs, but our work with themshould be changed fundamentally.

"The co-chair should understand that they are not monopolists, nor
can they become monopolists. There areseveral countries in the Minsk
Group. Turkey, which is a member of the Minsk Group, has always
supported us. Germany hasrepeatedly supported Azerbaijan’s
territorial integrity at the highest level," Azimov said.

A tough subject, a tougher read

The Seattle Times, WA
March 14, 2008 Friday
Fourth Edition

A tough subject, a tougher read;
Author appearance

by Irene Wanner, Special to The Seattle Times

Micheline Aharonian Marcom has published two acclaimed novels, "Three
Apples Fell from Heaven" and "The Daydreaming Boy." Both focused on
the 1915-1917 Armenian genocide. Born in Saudi Arabia to an American
father and Armenian-Lebanese mother, Marcom moved with her family to
the United States in 1968, but she never forgot her painful heritage.
Now she turns in her writing to an American setting: Los Angeles,
where she grew up.

Sadly, "Draining the Sea" (Riverhead, 335 pp., $26.95), which
completes her trilogy about the Armenian genocide and its aftermath,
is an impossibly convoluted, repetitious and confusing
stream-of-consciousness novel.

Its narrator, for instance. Who is he? A "fat white lonely American
("half-Armenian") boy." Several times, he claims he was married. His
son died in utero, and after the fetus was removed, the narrator’s
wife divorced him. Or did she? Was there a wife and baby?

"This too could be a fiction: the wife the green armchair the house
on Hollyline Av," he claims. "Reader, how will you decide?"

At night, the nameless narrator drives Los Angeles’ freeways
collecting dead dogs, which he buries in his garden. He is writing an
essay, apparently, to someone named Marta, a Guatemalan prostitute
who was tortured and murdered. Was the narrator a soldier? Did he
love and/or kill her? Is he making her up? She is his confessor,
someone he desires sexually. Someone whose fate during the United
States’ 1982-83 incursions he can’t stop imagining. Or is he actually
remembering?

"What," he wonders, "am I then? corpse-collector; essayist; motorist
… a once-husband and a half-father; half-Armenian; and a
businessman on most Gregorian calendar days, a buyer on all the days,
and I have not liked my meals in courses, but piled on my plate, and
meat at night and for lunch every afternoon the business and the
leisure, the Shows and the shirts made of fine cottons and wools: I
have been stricken; I have been stiff and my bones, as if made of
wood in the mornings before I travel the highways to the office, over
the hills of Santa Monica and down the canyon, which is the 405, to
work; on the days when there is no business, no TO DO’s, no wife or
meeting or dinners! or games: then I am stricken, then I am wooden
and quiet, alone in my green and padded armchair in the San Fernando
Valley."

Well, what to make of Marcom’s intensely felt, utterly bewildering
work?

To complete this assignment, I divided the number of pages in the
book by the number of days until deadline, then got up each day
dreading the task of making sense of the novel. I’m not a poet, and
thought the fault was mine, that such previously highly praised
poetic prose was over my head.

But I kept returning to a long-ago day at Port Townsend’s Centrum
summer program, when I visited a fiction-writing class that Raymond
Carver led. One story was so compressed, so opaque, that Carver’s
usual gentle approach seemed uncharacteristically harsh. He told the
writer, "You’re making this too hard."

Day by day, as I slogged through my appointed pages, I became
increasingly frustrated. How could Marcom indulge herself with such
language? She had received several of the writing world’s juiciest
plums a Lannan Literary Fellowship, a PEN USA Literary Award for
Fiction, a Whiting Writers’ Award yet this book circled on and on and
on … to what purpose? How had her poor editor, copy editor and
proofreader ever managed? And readers, not paid to cope with this
narrator’s fixations on sex, masturbation, defecation, urination,
torture, war … what would hold them?

I recalled another piece of writing: Carolyn Forché’s prose poem,
"The Colonel," about atrocities in El Salvador. In a spare couple of
hundred words, vivid horrors balanced pointed understatements. Forché
had a clear agenda, too, but her message was far too important to
obscure. Unlike Forché, Marcom has made this too hard.

Author appearance
Micheline Aharonian Marcom reads from "Draining the Sea," 7:30 p.m.
today, Elliott Bay Book Co., 101 S. Main St., Seattle; free
(206-624-6600 or )

www.elliottbaybook.com

58 questions and 8 international contracts in NA session

Panorama.am

15:17 15/03/2008

58 QUESTIONS AND 8 INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTS IN NA SESSION

On 17 March four-day session of the National Assembly
starts. According to the official website of the NA,
10 questions are listed in discussion, in the projects
parts 48 questions and 8 international contracts are
involved.

Note that in NA session daily list the project of
conducting changes and the March 17-20 four-days
session project would be affirmed in the NA session on
Monday.

Source: Panorama.am