Aram Sargsyan: We Have All Chances To Get 100 Thousand Votes

ARAM SARGSYAN: WE HAVE ALL CHANCES TO GET 100 THOUSAND VOTES

ArmRadio.am
30.04.2007 17:03

Unlike a number of political parties that withdraw from teh election
race the Democratic Party of Armenia intends to continue the
competition and participate in the elections.

In the pre-election period it will not unite with any other party.

The leader of the party Aram Sargsyan told a press conference today
that the Democratic Party has all the changes to receive 100 thousand
votes in the forthcoming elections.

Aram Sargsyan does not believe in the public opinion polls. According
to him, the surveys cannot correspond to reality, since 70% of the
respondents prefer not to answer the question or say they have not
decided.

Simultaneously, according to Aram Sargsyan, 30% of the voters will
be bribed.

Aram Sargsyan expressed concern about the fact of collection
of passport data by some political parties, since this creates
preconditions for further electoral frauds.

"We defend the principles of social justice. Therefore, we shall get
the support of the needy layers of the population," Aram Sargsyan
noted.

What Americans did is not only unserious, but also worrisome for Arm

What Americans did is not only unserious, but also worrisome for Armenia

27.04.2007 16:09
Tatul Hakobyan
"Radiolur"

At the February 19, 2005 meeting, John Evans used the word "genocide"
to describe the Armenian massacres and deportations in the Ottoman
Empire. "I will today call it the Armenian Genocide… I think we,
the US government, owe you, our fellow citizens, a more frank and
honest way of discussing this problem. Today, as someone who has
studied it, there’s no doubt in my mind [as to] what happened. I
think it is unbecoming of us, as Americans, to play word games here. I
believe in calling things by their name," he said. Ambassador Evans
also disclosed that he had consulted with a legal advisor at the State
Department who had confirmed that the events of 1915 were "genocide by
definition". Referring to the Armenian Genocide as "the first genocide
of the 20th century" he added: " We made many mistakes after WWI."

At the gathering, John Evans also insisted that "although the US
follows a policy of territorial integrity of nations, everybody
realizes that Karabakh can’t be given back to Azerbaijan. That would
be a disastrous step." Commenting on a statement by Ramiz Melikov,
head of the Press Service at the Defense Ministry of Azerbaijan, who
had said that there would be no Armenia left in 25 years, Evans said,
"This was an outrageous, bellicose statement, and it brought all the
bad memories of Armenians back."

But just a few days later, back in Yerevan, John Evans corrected
himself by stating, "Although I told my audience that the United
States policy on the Armenian tragedy has not changed, I used the
term ‘genocide’ speaking in what I characterized as my personal
capacity. This was inappropriate." Referring to the Nagorno Karabakh
conflict, Ambassador Evans noted, "The US government supports the
territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and holds that the future status
of Nagorno Karabakh is a matter of negotiations between Armenia and
Azerbaijan." Those who are seriously following the negotiation process
understand that Evans has not made a discovery. The ex-Ambassador
simply said a thing that is not permitted to say aloud.

Ever since 1992 the US policy on Nagorno Karabakh has been as follows:
Washington recognizes the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan but
does not predict the outcome of the negotiations. To put it more
simply, this means that the issue of the status of Nagorno Karabakh
is left for the conflicting parties to decide. However, in reality,
since 1988 the US policy has undergone several abrupt changes.

The Human Rights Report of the US Department of State, which caused
a number of comments in government circles of Armenia and Azerbaijan
and mass media, not only fails to reflect the real state of affairs,
but also contradicts to the spirit of the US policy.

The suggestions on the bargaining table, the OSCE Minsk Group
Co-Chairs presented in April 2006, is the approach of delayed
referendum. Considering this document clandestine is senseless, since
due to a number of interviews of the US Co-Chair of the Minsk Group
Matthew Bryza it’s not a secret for experts, at least. That is to
say that Americans want the Armenian forces to withdraw from the five
territories adjacent to Nagorno Karabakh, and maybe even Kelbajar. For
its part, Azerbaijan should agree to determine the status of Nagorno
Karabakh though referendum, but in 10-15 years. This is the core of
the document on the bargaining table.

Immediately after replacing Steven Mann, Matthew Bryza declared in
an interview that that the withdrawal of Armenian troops from the
occupied territories is an important component of the main principles
of settlement. "However, urging the Armenians to withdraw from these
territories, which will reduce the tension, we shall not hit the
target. If Armenians are sure they will receive something instead,
they will do that. The experts are correct: if Armenians troops are
withdrawn, it will reduce the tension. However, they must receive
something in exchange. That is why the leaders of the countries must
take a hard decision. The most difficult is to time the withdrawal
with the determination of the status of Nagorno Karabakh."

Everyone remembers Key West, when the parties, in the words of
another American Co-Chair Kerry Kavano, "were unbelievably close
to settlement." The main architect of the Key West was the US. The
document based on exchange of territories, envisaged annexation of
Nagorno Karabakh with Lachin corridor to Armenia. Certainly, Armenia
was to go to compromises. This and many other facts evidence that the
content and spirit of the US State Department report contradicts the
policy on the Karabakh conflict settlement the US has assumed.

If Washington really changes its policy and accepts that "Armenia
continues to occupy the Azerbaijani territory of Nagorno-Karabakh
and seven surrounding Azerbaijani territories," then the question
arises: to what extent the United States is proper to be an unbiased
mediator? Let’s pay attention that member of the Minsk Group Turkey,
which is often blamed for its obvious pro-Azerbaijani position,
seems to be more unbiased on this background.

If the United States really considers Nagorno Karabakh (let aside
the adjacent territories) as a territory occupied by Armenia,
then Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act had to be directed
against Armenia. While it is known that from 1992 through 2001 the US
Government was rendering no assistance to Azerbaijan, since the latter
imposed and upholds the blockade of Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh. If
Nagorno Karabakh is an occupied territory for the Americans, then
why did they provide $35 million in aid to Nagorno Karabakh between
1998-2006? Moreover, a number of American officials have noted that
the US is the only state besides Armenia to provide aid to Karabakh.

If Armenia continues the occupation of Nagorno Karabakh, then what
is the logic of providing over $1.5 billion aid during the past
15 years? Or why was Armenia included in the Millennium Challenge
Programme?

If we take the four resolutions the UN adopted in 1993, it is clearly
written there that the territories adjacent to Nagorno Karabakh have
been occupied by Karabakhi forces. Moreover, when in May 1992 the
Karabakhi forces liberated the Lachin corridor, the UN did not adopt
any resolution. It was obvious for the international community that
war was logical, and while there was no direct land communication
between Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh, the Armenians of Karabakh were
destined to be annihilated. Only after the Karabakhi forces seized
the control of Kelbajar, and five other territories, the UN started
adopting resolutions one after the other. The international community
started to comprehend that the Karabakh war was exceeding the frames
of their imagination.

At last, when the Soviet Union still existed, the US Senate adopted
two resolutions on Nagorno Karabakh. In the second resolution adopted
November 19, 1989 it was urging the USSR leadership to find a fair
solution to the conflict which would reflect the will of the region’s
population. In particular, it was mentioned in the resolution that
80% of the population of the Nagorno Karabakh Autonomous Region of
was Armenians. The very next day the USSR Ministry of Foreign Affairs
and the Foreign Relations Committee of the Supreme Council condemned
the resolution on Nagorno Karabakh adopted by the US Senate.

According to Deputy Foreign Minister A. Bessmertnikh, "it was a crude
and self-proclaimed mediation" and "such decision of the Senate panel
caused the sharp resistance of Soviet citizens, and this irritation
can be understood."

In the resolution of 19 July, 1989 the Senate called on Mikhail
Gorbachev to discuss with the representatives of Nagorno Karabakh the
demand of February 20, 1988 to reunite the Nagorno Karabakh Autonomous
Region with Armenia.

The Human Rights Report of the US Department of State the wording
on Armenia, its change, and the restoration of the initial wording
can be considered unserious. On the other hand, with such "unserious"
steps the US probably sends a message to Armenia. We can only suppose
why this form of expression of dissatisfaction was chosen. But one
thing is obvious: with such changing statements the Americans shake
the image the commons citizens have about them in Armenia.

CR: Rep. Costa Commemorates Armenian Genocide

[Congressional Record: April 24, 2007 (House)]
[Page H4027]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:cr24ap07-185]

ANNIVERSARY OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

(Mr. COSTA asked and was given permission to address the House for 1
minute.)
Mr. COSTA. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to commemorate the 96th
anniversary of the Armenian genocide.
On March 24, 1915, 300 Armenian leaders were rounded up and deported
and killed under the orders from the young Turk Government. And so
began the genocide that lasted for 7 years, resulting in an estimated
over 1.5 million Armenian deaths. To this day, unfortunately, the
Turkish Government denies that this occurred.
Ladies and gentlemen, Members of the House, I just returned from
Darfur with a group of our colleagues 2 weeks ago. Over 450,000 people
have been killed and millions displaced in Darfur; yet government
officials claim there in Darfur and Sudan that there is no genocide,
that the situation is overblown.
Yesterday Rwanda, today Darfur. And we can remember the
Holocaust. Clearly, silence is genocide’s best ally. It is time that
the Congress end this silence and pass the Armenian genocide
resolution. The message will be clear: the United States of America
will never forget and never stand for those who support genocide.

____________________

World Recognition of the Armenian Genocide Becoming More and More Un

WORLD RECOGNITION OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE BECOMING MORE AND MORE UNAVOIDABLE EACH YEAR

AZG Armenian Daily #078, 28/04/2007

Genocide Recognition

Although President of the USA George Bush continues to avoid saying
"genocide", he still remains the head of the only state in the
world that officially commemorates the victims of the massacres in
1915. Naturally, Turkey is trying to take counter-actions against
the recognition process and the Resolutions of the murder of Hrant
Dink and the Armenian Genocide pending at the both chambers of the US
Congress. Nevertheless it should be noted that the speech of George W
Bush and the Resolutions are not the only matter of Turkey’s concerns.

This year on April 24 statements about the Genocide were made by
Nicolas Sarkozy and Segolene Royal, main candidates for Presidency in
France and Stefan Harper, Prime Minister of Canada. Royal and Sarkozy
expressed intention to strive against denial of the Armenian Genocide
in France.

Turkey also responded to the statement of Prime Minister
Harper. Foreign Ministry of Turkey says that there can be no friendship
of alliance between two states without justice and truthfulness. The
Foreign Ministry’s statement also says that Harper’s words can by no
means contribute the efforts of reconciliation between Armenia and
Turkey. The Turks call upon Harper to revise the events of 1915 in
objective and impartial atmosphere and urge the Canadian scientists
to do the same.

In any case, the statements by the pretenders fro the post of the
President of France, the April 24 speeches of the USA President and
the Prime Minister of Canada, the resolutions about Armenian issues
display one thing clearly – the world recognition of the Armenian
Genocide is becoming more and more certain year by year.

By H. Chaqrian

AGBU-Sponsored Armenian Philharmonic Orchestra Tours France

AGBU Press Office
55 East 59th Street
New York, NY 10022-1112
Phone: 212.319.6383, x118
Fax: 212.319.6507
Email: [email protected]
Website:

PRESS RELEASE

Tuesday, April 25, 2007

AGBU-Sponsored Armenian Philharmonic Orchestra Tours France

>From February 6 – 15, 2007, the 120-member Armenian Philharmonic
Orchestra (APO) toured seven French cities (Nice, Vendée,
Saint-Etienne, Lyon, Valence, Marseille, and Paris) to entertain
thousands of music lovers as part of the "Year of Armenia" festival
of Armenian culture taking place in France this year.

Entitled "Armenié mon Amie" (Armenia my friend), the yearlong showcase
of Armenian culture was established by France to honor the special
relationship between the two countries while creating bridges between
the peoples of both nations.

Sponsored by AGBU and with the involvement of the organization’s many
French chapters, the nine-day APO tour provided one of the highlights
of the "Year of Armenia" in France, by showcasing the high level of
achievement in Armenia’s cultural institutions.

The APO concerts were attended by a variety of French political
figures and cultural personalities. On stage, the APO was joined by a
number of leading European Armenian musicians whose presence
highlighted the wide breadth of achievement among Armenians across
Europe. Twenty-two-year-old virtuoso violinist Sergey Khatchatryan
accompanied the APO in its sold-out concert for 1,200 in St. Etienne,
pianist Vahan Mardirossian joined the APO for major performances in
Lyon and Marseilles, and renowned pianist Vardan Mamigonian joined the
orchestra for its Valence concert that attracted over 1,000 music
lovers.

Along with songs by Armenian composers, Alexander Spendiarian and Aram
Khatchaturian, renowned pieces by Jean Sibelius and Sergei Rachmaninov
completed the APO program during its French tour.

In each city they visited, members of the APO took time out of their
busy schedules to familiarize themselves with the local French
Armenian community, and visit local AGBU chapters, to promote greater
awareness of the orchestra.

The French media covered the tour extensively as part of the "Year of
Armenia" events. For more information on the APO’s role in the
festivities, visit:
de-l-Orchestre.

Established in 1924, the APO has been primarily subsidized by AGBU
since 1992 in recognition of the importance of the performing arts in
Armenia. Annual grants are allocated for weekly concerts, new
instruments, administration, salary supplements, international guest
artists and special festivals. APO has successfully toured Austria,
England, France, Germany, Greece, Iran, Lebanon, Russia, Turkey, UAE
and the United States, and has produced dozens of CD recordings. For
more information on APO, please visit

For more information on AGBU and its worldwide programs, please visit

www.agbu.org
www.armenie-mon-amie.com/Tournee-en-France-
www.apo.am.
www.agbu.org.

Sociometer Says Rating Of BHK Declines

SOCIOMETER SAYS RATING OF BHK DECLINES

Panorama.am
14:52 27/04/2007

Sociometer has reported decline in rating of Prosperous Armenia Party
(BHK).

Aharon Adibekyan, director of the center, said, "Enthusiasm to this
party has declined. It had 70 percent level of trust which went
down to 50 and may even decline to 30 percent." In the words of the
sociologist, educated people understand that BHK has populist slogans
and high promises.

Asked about sociological studies conducted by British Populus,
Adibekyan said in fact Armenian specialists conduct the surveys and
named Armenian Sociological Association as a major implementer. "The
studies of Populus were not conducted by employees of Sociometer but
they exactly coincide with our studies."

Author With Local Ties To Launch Book Tour At ESU

AUTHOR WITH LOCAL TIES TO LAUNCH BOOK TOUR AT ESU
by Dan Berrett
Pocono Record Writer

Pocono Record, PA
April 26 2007

A 15-year-old girl named Ester Minerajian Ahronian Ajemian was walking
home from school through the village of Amasia in Armenia one afternoon
in 1915.

She saw a man, whom Ester thought was no older than 17, with his
hands bound behind him. A group of Turkish soldiers walked with him,
their guns jabbed into his back.

As they passed, Ester heard the man whispering the Lord’s Prayer
in Armenian.

They took him to a large wooden platform in the town square where a
crowd quickly formed.

"I sucked in my breath," Ester recalled. "I was about to witness a
hanging and my blood was racing."

The soldiers tied a noose around the boy’s neck.

"He shouted one word – Asvadzeem ­– Armenian for "my God" before
the trap door under him snapped open," Ester said.

He jerked and kicked his legs before the life drained from his body.

"His eyes were staring wide open when another soldier near the platform
sliced open the boy’s stomach. His insides hit the ground in a bloody
clump and splashed in all directions."

Ester turned to the wall and vomited, then ran home to tell her
grandmother what she had just seen.

"Grandmom smacked me hard," Ester recounted. "’Tell no one what
you saw’."

The passage appears about one-third of the way through "A Knock at
the Door," a new memoir written by Ester’s daughter, Margaret Ajemian
Ahnert. The scene marks the beginning of three years of hell in
Ester’s life – spanning a death march, her rape and being essentially
enslaved by a Turkish family – all of which Ahnert recounts in her
mother’s voice. The narrative gives readers an intimate view of
the Armenian genocide, which was carried out by the Ottoman Empire
between 1915-1918.

The book was released by Beaufort Press on Tuesday to coincide with
the 92nd anniversary of the deportations of Armenian intellectuals
and leaders in Constantinople. On Monday, Ahnert will be kicking off
her national book tour with a free public lecture at East Stroudsburg
University.

Ahnert is beginning her tour in the Poconos because of her family ties
to the area. She is the widow of Robert Ahnert, the former co-owner,
with his brother Harry, of Fernwood Resorts. Her late husband was
an ESU graduate; the university’s alumni center was named after her
brother-in-law. She lived here for 21 years.

She grew up in New York hearing her mother’s stories of the old
country. They were fairly benign, for the most part, and filled with
folk wisdom, though there were hints of the brutality her mother
had endured.

"I think when you’re young, you don’t realize the impact of what
you’re hearing," Ahnert said. "I thought they were painful stories
my mother lived through."

It wasn’t until she was 17, when Ahnert read Franz Werfel’s "The Forty
Days of Musa Dagh," that the full weight of her family’s history and
its connection to the larger genocide – the first of the bloody 20th
century – became clear.

"When I read that book, I suddenly realized this was something my
mother lived through," Ahnert said Wednesday from her home in Ft.

Lauderdale, Fla. "Then I started asking her questions and she’d tell
me more things. I’d always write her story down and it’d be amazing
to me."

Ahnert collected notebooks full of stories from her mother. Over the
years, her mother’s recollection of the details remained constant.

Ahnert assembled the memories into the memoir’s narrative of her
mother’s traumas, which she alternates with an account 83 years later,
as she visits her mother in an Armenian home for the aged.

"It’s been brewing all my life," Ahnert said of the book, which
she wrote as her master’s of fine arts thesis at Goucher College in
Baltimore, Md.

Her motives for writing were personal at first. "It started out as
a family memoir," she said. "So that my children and grandchildren
would know what my mother lived through."

But the history itself remains bitterly contested. Turkey continues
to deny or downplay what happened, often depicting the genocide as
happening in the fog of war as the Ottoman Empire crumbled, and saying
that both sides suffered.

A measure scheduled to come to the floor of the U.S. House
of Representatives, which would have joined 15 other nations in
classifying the event as genocide, has brought the issue back to center
stage. The issue has tied the U.S. government in knots because Turkey
is a key ally in the Middle East and a source of oil.

Historians say that as many as 1.5 million Armenians died in the
genocide, with many more deported, driven from their homes, tortured,
massacred and starved.

Ironically, Armenians themselves were part of the process of burying
history. Ahnert writes that her father often urged her to mortseer,
or forget.

"The Armenians came here and tried to forget," she said. "By forcing
themselves to forget, the world forgot. It’s still denied and the
world didn’t even know about it."

She said she often gives readings and asks those in attendance if
they have heard about the Armenian genocide. She’s lucky if one raises
her hand.

Ahnert hopes her book will raise awareness. "On a broader scale, if
my neighbors and other non-Armenians now know something they didn’t
know, that would please me very much."

IF YOU GO…

What: Lecture by Margaret Ajemian Ahnert, author of "A Knock at
the Door," a memoir of her mother’s experience during the Armenian
genocide.

When: Monday at 5:15 p.m.

Where: Beers Lecture Hall, East Stroudsburg University How much:
Free and open to the public For more information: Call 570 422-3532

l/article?AID=/20070426/NEWS/704260352

–Boundary _(ID_5JiQTKhcJpUYJl20XSV2RA)–

http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbcs.dl

Imprisonment Term Of Artur Poghosian Prolonged By Two Months

IMPRISONMENT TERM OF ARTUR POGHOSIAN PROLONGED BY TWO MONTHS

Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
Apr 26 2007

AKHALTSKHA, APRIL 26, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. The imprisonment
term of Artur Poghosian, activist of United Javakhk Democratic Bloc,
arrested the day before was prolonged by two months by the decision
of Samtskhe-Javakhk region’s first instance court. Immediately after
this A. Poghosian was moved from the town of Akhaltskha. According
to some rumors, he is in Tbilisi now.

Noyan Tapan was informed about it from Javakhk-Info.

The trial over another defendant Nairi Iritsian, member of presidium
of United Javakhk Democratic Bloc, deputy of Akhalkalak regional
sakrebulo, will be also held on April 26.

To recap, Artur Poghosian and Nairi Iritsian are accused of conflict
with the driver of Akhalkalak Regional Prosecutor.

Fired For Saying The Word "Genocide"

FIRED FOR SAYING THE WORD "GENOCIDE"

LAist, California
April 24 2007

John Marshall Evans became the US ambassador to Armenia in August
2004. Six months later he visited California and was convinced by
Armenian-Americans here to cut the political B.S. and simply say that
the 1.5 million Armenians who were the victims of genocide at the hands
of the Turks from 1915 and 1923… were indeed victims of genocide.

Today President Bush will tapdance around the word in fear of insulting
our ally Turkey, a country that is critical in our actions in the
Middle East. Infact over the last 13 years on April 24, ridiculously
but officially dubbed "National Day of Remembrance of Man’s Inhumanity
to Man", US Presidents acknowledge the Armenian tragedy without ever
saying the G-word. Whereas most of the EU recognizes the genocide,
Switzerland and France have taken it to the next level making it a
crime to deny the genocide.

Ambassador Evans’ crime was saying the word. In a interview with the
LA Times today, he explains that because no one ever really said the
word he didn’t really know what the punishment would be.

Clearly when I was here in February 2005, I knew that by mentioning
this word, I could get myself in trouble. I didn’t know precisely
what the degree of that trouble would be, but I knew that it could
range from a slap on the wrist to being immediately canned. And as it
turned out it was something between those extremes: I got more than
a mere slap on the wrist, I wasn’t immediately canned. I basically
was eased out after about 18 months, although I had more time on my
clock. […] I was basically asked to go ahead and retire.

The entire interview with the Times’ Matt Welch is fascinating, as is
Welch’s piece on Sunday explaining the dilemma President Bush faces
today as to how he will approach the G-word.

We’re sure the president will handle it as gracefully as he normally
does when slamdancing with the English language.

4/fired_for_saying_the_word_genocide.php

http://www.laist.com/archives/2007/04/2

Two And A Half Years In Prison For Editor Who "Insulted" Azerbaijani

TWO AND A HALF YEARS IN PRISON FOR EDITOR WHO "INSULTED" AZERBAIJANIS
Source: Reporters Without Borders

Nieuwsbank , Netherlands
April 23 2007

Voicing concern about the growing number of press freedom violations in
Azerbaijan, Reporters Without Borders today called for the immediate
release of Eynulla Fatullayev, the editor of the weekly Realny
Azerbaijan and of the daily Gundelik Azerbaijan, who was given a
two-and-a-half year jail term by the Yasamal district court in Baku
on 20 April for "defaming" and "insulting" Azerbaijanis in an article
about murders of Azeris in Hojali town of Nagorno Karabakh. He was
taken off to prison at the end of the court hearing.

Fatullayev was already convicted of libel in 2002, when he was fined
10,000 euros. He used to be deputy editor of the Monitor, a weekly
known for criticising President Ilham Aliev’s government. Its founder
and editor, Elmar Huseynov, was murdered on 2 March 2005.

Uzeir Jafarov, a journalist with Gundelik Azerbaijan, was attacked
and beaten by two men as he was returning to his car after the 20
April court hearing. He said he recognised one of his assailants as
someone who had attended the Fatullayev trial.