Azeri-Armenian Framework On Rebel Region Soon-U.S.

AZERI-ARMENIAN FRAMEWORK ON REBEL REGION SOON-U.S.

Reuters, UK
Related News
Oct 26 2007

Oct 26 (Reuters) – Armenia and Azerbaijan may sign a framework
agreement over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh territory by February or
March, the U.S. deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian
affairs, Matthew Bryza, said on Friday. The predominantly Armenian
populated Enclave of Nargorno-Karabakh broke away from Azerbaijan
in the late 1980s, triggering a 1992-94 war between Armenian-backed
separatists and the Azeri army in which more than 35,000 people were
killed. Borders between Azerbaijan and Armenia are still closed and
official ties have been severed although the countries’ two leaders
do meet from time to time on foreign soil. "I think that before the
(Armenian) elections we could have a framework agreement," Bryza told
the Azeri ANS television station. Bryza is a member of an international
group under the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe
(OSCE) which is pushing for a resolution to the conflict. Since 1994
a separatist army, backed by Armenian volunteers, has controlled
Nagorno-Karabakh whose 140,000 inhabitants have voted twice in
unrecognised referendums for independence.

Armenia is still to decide when to hold its presidential election,
expected in either February or March.

Panel Votes To Give Turkey Old U.S. Warships

PANEL VOTES TO GIVE TURKEY OLD U.S. WARSHIPS

Ottawa Citizen
October 24, 2007 Wednesday
Canada

WASHINGTON – A U.S. congressional committee agreed yesterday to give
Turkey several decommissioned U.S. military ships, but the legislator
who sponsored the plan denied it was intended to temper Ankara’s
anger over U.S. legislation on Armenian genocide.

On a voice vote, the House foreign affairs committee approved the
package, worth $485 million for Turkey, which was infuriated by the
same panel’s vote Oct. 10 to label as genocide the 1915 massacres of
Armenians by Ottoman Turks.

Representative Tom Lantos, who sponsored the bill to transfer three
naval vessels to Turkey and sell a fourth at a large discount, said
it was a routine transaction with "zero" relationship to the Armenian
genocide controversy.

It was unclear how long the measure had been in the works, and it
now goes to the House floor for a vote.

City Pays Tribute To FA Cup Hero

CITY PAYS TRIBUTE TO FA CUP HERO

Story from BBC NEWS:
d/wear/7059505.stm
Published: 2007/10/24 08:17:40 GMT

A memorial service for Sunderland footballing legend Ian Porterfield
is taking place in the city on Wednesday.

Mr Porterfield, who scored the club’s famous FA Cup-winning goal
against Leeds United in 1973, died at a hospice in Surrey, aged 61.

A book of remembrance will be opened at Sunderland Minster, where
the FA Cup will also be on display.

Former playing colleagues from Wearside joined family and friends at
his funeral in Bagshot on 20 September.

Until his death Mr Porterfield, originally from Dunfermline, was the
manager of Armenia’s national team.

He also managed several other international teams as well as Rotherham,
Sheffield United, Aberdeen, Reading and Chelsea.

Wednesday’s service, between 1100 BST and 1300 BST, will be presided
over by Sunderland Football Club chaplain, Canon Stephen Taylor.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/englan

Cooperation For The Benefit Of The Two Countries & The Region

COOPERATION TO THE BENEFIT OF THE TWO COUNTRIES AND THE REGION
Lilit Pohghosyan

Hayots Ashkharh Daily
Oct 23 2007
Armenia

Yesterday MAHMOUD AHMADINEDJAD, President of the Islamic Republic
of Iran arrived in Armenia on a two-day official visit. The same day
the leader of Iran had a meeting with President Kocharyan.

The Presidents summed up the results of the negotiations, first held in
the form of a tete-a-tete and then followed by an enlarged meeting;
they signed a number of documents regarding different spheres of
the Armenian-Iranian cooperation. Then, within the frameworks of
an open-air briefing, they summed up the mosaic of the agreements
reached at the current stage of Armenia-Iran dialogue and confirmed
their determination to continue the Armenian-Iranian relations to
the benefit of the two peoples, regional security and stability.

Welcoming his counterpart, R. Kocharyan particularly stated, "Iran is
an extremely important partner for us. We have a very broad agenda of
relations, and today we re-confirmed our positive attitude towards
the large-scale programs we are implementing jointly. As you know,
the construction of the Armenian-Iranian gas pipeline is under way.

Today we discussed and reconfirmed the possibility of constructing
the three-sided oil refinery and railroad. Of course, all this is
currently in the process of calculations, because those steps have
to be economically beneficial to the parties."

The parties also signed a cooperation agreement in the sphere of
banking, which, as R. Kocharyan is convinced, will enable them to
extend their relations in this sphere.

The political aspects of the cooperation were not overlooked
either. The Presidents agreed to liven up the external ties and discuss
regional issues, including the developments around the Karabakh
conflict. "Of course, I have let the Iranian President know about
negotiation process. We have discussed different regional issues. In
general, we had quite open discussions around all the issues, and I
am grateful to my counterpart both for his visit and for accepting
the invitation."

Touching upon the "continuously developing sustainable relations", the
Iranian President mentioned in his turn, "I am very happy for having
the opportunity to visit Armenia by the invitation of my counterpart
R. Kocharyan and discuss with our Armenian colleagues the potentials of
deepening the Armenian-Iranian cooperation. This is our third meeting
within the last 1-year period. The first meeting took place in Tehran
last year, when the RA President arrived in Iran on an official visit;
the second meeting took place this March on the Armenian-Iranian
border; the next meeting is taking place now in Yerevan."

According to him, the goal of this particular visit and the pivotal
issue of the meetings and discussions with the Armenian colleagues is
to find new ways of realizing the unused resources existing in the
bilateral relations, and first of all – the economic cooperation as
well as confirming them by practical programs.

"Fortunately, there are no obstacles, and we have great chances
for developing bilateral relations in all the spheres. During
the meeting, we both emphasized that we recognize no measures and
limits for that, especially in the fields of energy, oil and gas,
electric power production, communications, transportation, as well
as in the sphere of mutual investments with regard to extending the
cooperation between the two countries. We are sure that the bilateral
disposition is constructive, and it is to the benefit of the region,"
stated the Iranian President, expressing confidence that the volumes
of the commodity circulation between the two countries will record
very speedy and visible results.

Responding to the questions, M. Ahmadinedjad estimated the
Armenian-Iranian relations as "cloudless" and, what’s more,
"excellent". "Our relations with Armenia are friendly, based on mutual
respect, and this is true for all the spheres. There is no lack of
trust or feeling of coldness between our peoples in any matter,"
he said.

Detailing the results of the agreements achieved during the
negotiations, R. Kocharyan particularly mentioned that the Armenian
section of Armenia-Iran gas pipeline (let’s note that the opening of
the Iranian section of the pipeline took place at the beginning of the
year) is to open on October 28. "I will take part in the ceremony. I
hope the gas pipeline will have transit capacities. Time will show to
what extent such potential will be revealed. We are seriously disposed
to linking the railroads to one another. We are also seriously disposed
towards the issue of the three-sided operation of the oil refinery
(Russia being the third side – L.P.).

Here, I repeat, it is necessary to calculate everything. The programs
are large-scale, and large-scale programs demand a certain stage of
discussions and calculations. We are currently at that stage."

In short, the Armenian-Iranian relations are, in the estimation of the
RA President, entering a new stage in which "our economic relations
will be much deeper". The agenda of the issues discussed is quite
vivid and provides the best evidence of the current stage of the
Armenian-Iranian relations.

Moreover, the fact that the "the Iranian President and Government
treat these issues with such attention shows that the development
of the bilateral relations is a priority not only for Armenia,
but also for the Iranian side, for which I express my gratitude,"
stated President R. Kocharyan at the end of his speech.

Iran Negotiator Heads For Nuclear Talks

IRAN NEGOTIATOR HEADS FOR NUCLEAR TALKS

Evening Echo
Oct 23 2007
Ireland

Iran’s new top nuclear negotiator will hold his first meeting with the
EU’s foreign policy chief over Tehran’s contentious nuclear programme
today in Rome.

Saeed Jalili, a little known diplomat, was appointed his country’s
chief negotiator after Ali Larijani stepped down at the weekend.

The departure of the moderate Larijani was seen as a victory for
hardline President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad that could push the Islamic
Republic into an even more defiant position in its stand-off with
the West.

However, Larijani was set to attend the Rome talks today alongside
Jalili and the EU’s Javier Solana, according to Iran’s Foreign
Ministry.

The talks had been scheduled before Larijani was replaced. The US and
some of its allies accuse Iran of secretly trying to develop nuclear
weapons and have demanded it halt uranium enrichment, a key step in
the production of atomic weapons.

Tehran denies the claim, saying its programme is for peaceful purposes
including generating electricity.

The UN Security Council has imposed two sets of sanctions over Iran’s
refusal to suspend uranium enrichment.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad cut short his two-day visit to
Armenia today, an Armenian presidential spokesman said.

The Armenian government had expected Ahmadinejad to address parliament
and, in what was likely to cause controversy, plant a sapling at a
memorial commemorating the victims of what Armenians consider genocide.

Viktor Sogomonian, press secretary of Armenian President Robert
Kocharian, gave no reason for the Iranian president’s decision to
miss both planned events and return to Iran.

Russia’s ITAR-Tass news agency, citing an unnamed source, said the
decision was connected with unexpected developments in Iran.

ANTELIAS: HH Aram I attends Intl Meeting by Community of Sant Egidio

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Officer
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:

PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon

Armenian version: nian.htm

THE VATICAN REMAINS COMMITTED TO LEBANESE SOVEREIGNTY,
COEXISTENCE AND THE HOLDING OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

ANNOUNCES HIS HOLINESS ARAM I

Naples – The Vatican remains committed more than ever to the strengthening
of the unity, independence and sovereignty of Lebanon and the holding of
presidential elections during the timeframe provided for in the
Constitution, announced Catholicos Aram I while answering the questions of a
group of journalists in Naples, Italy on October 21.

The Pontiff made the statement after having lunch with His Holiness Pope
Benedict XVI and a meeting with the Vatican’s official secretary H. Em.
Card. Tarcisio Bertone.

The Armenian spiritual leader said: "During my lunch with His Holiness I
spoke about the situation in Lebanon. The Pope is well informed about the
situation and is doing what he can to help Lebanon. Then I held a long
meeting with the official Secretary Cardinal Bertone. I explained to him the
situation in the country and the importance of the presidential elections. I
concluded with great happiness that the Vatican continues to pay special
attention to Lebanon and remains committed to the strengthening of its
unique character and role."

The Sant’Egidio conference is presently convening in Naples with the
participation of religious and political figures belonging to all religions,
the Prime Minister of Italy Prodi, presidents, ministers and government
officials. The Pope presided over the inauguration service. Catholicos Aram
I will deliver a speech to the conference tomorrow. He will also hold
meetings with the attendants to discuss the situation in Lebanon.

##
View the photos here:
tos/Photos48.htm
*****
The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates of
the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about the Ecumenical
activities of the Cilician Catholicosate, you may refer to the web page of
the Catholicosate, The Cilician
Catholicosate, the administrative center of the church is located in
Antelias, Lebanon.

http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org/
http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org/v04/doc/Arme
http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org/v04/doc/Pho
http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org

The Republican Debate: First Take

THE REPUBLICAN DEBATE: FIRST TAKE

Atlantic Online
s/2007/10/the_republican_debate_first_ta.php
Oct 22 2007

As the Republicans debated who is more conservative tonight, two
voices stood out: Mitt Romney’s and Rudy Giuliani’s.

At long last, Romney defended and touted and bragged about the singular
political and policy accomplishment of his tenure as Massachusetts
governor: the health care system reform that provides every resident
there with insurance. Watching him at other debates, it was easy to
get the sense that he wasn’t sure how to integrate his Massachusetts
experience into his campaign narrative. The plan itself was written
with the help of Heritage Foundation experts but it did not, in the
end, comport with every conservative principle.

But it stands out as an prime example — perhaps the ultimate example
— of conservative governance. Romney worked hard at health care in
Massachusetts; he worked with Democrats; he worked with Republicans;
he wound up with a novel program that, while not perfect and not
transferable to other states, stands out as a real accomplishment.

Romney calls himself an executive and a manager; with health care,
he executed and managed in real time. At their Michigan debate,
Republicans seemed a bit reality-deaf and barely acknowledged the sense
of economic dislocation that middle class Republicans feel; Tonight,
Romney demonstrated that, given the right scenario, he can connect
with those voters better than just about any candidate up there.

His best moment may have been when he said that an insurmountable
problem like the health care crisis can, indeed, be solved. It wasn’t
just a candidate saying he was optimistic; he showed how optimism,
will and plod can be potent problem-solving forces.

After a tentative start, Giuliani again proved that he is so adept in
these formats and can handle really any question with finesse. And
he showed, again, that he is the Republican who best frames the
race against Hillary Clinton. He’s a natural at it. Also: Giuliani
should get some props from Ezra Klein: he accurately pointed out that
Medicare is in much worse shape than Social Security and is a much
more serious problem. At the end of the debate, he gave an answer on
Iran that sounded reasonable and not Podhoretz-esque.

Fred Thompson started off better than he finished — a meandering
answer on Turkey did not come off very well. At one point, he seemed
not to recognize that the Armenian Genocide proposal is already,
well, dead. He did have a cute final answer on his laziness.

John McCain — the only standing ovation belonged to him for his
classic line about Hillary Clinton’s Woodstock museum earmark: "I’m
sure it was an historical and pharmaceutical event… I was tied up
at the time." He tried hard — at times too hard — to rise above
his opponents, talking just a little too slowly and softly at times.

Substantively, he was crisp and detailed.

Ron Paul — what to say about a man who draws more boos than Hillary
Clinton from the crowd?

Mike Huckabee — Last debate, he faded into the background while
Thompson came into relief; this time, Huckabee stood his own, but
didn’t have any breakout moments.

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archive

An Emotional Call To Action

AN EMOTIONAL CALL TO ACTION
By Mark Spencer | Courant Staff Writer

Hartford Courant, CT
Oct 22 2007

There was a bond among the people who gathered Sunday on the steps of
Emanuel Lutheran Church in Hartford, almost as if they were members
of a tight-knit club or a family long separated by time and distance.

But from the haunting stories they recounted of harrowing escapes,
loved ones lost and homes set ablaze, it was clear this was a club
that no one would ever choose to join.

One by one, survivors or the relatives of survivors of genocide,
from Europe to Africa to Asia, made the same appeal:

This is what happened to us, they said, during the Holocaust and in
Armenia, Cambodia, Burundi, Rwanda, Bosnia and southern Sudan. It’s
happening again in Darfur. Please do not ignore it, they pleaded.

"For there in the deserts of Africa, but for a stroke of fate go I,"
said Harry Weichsel, who fled Nazi Germany as a boy with his mother,
only to lose much of the rest of his family.

Sunday’s event was part of a national effort called the Dream for
Darfur Olympic Torch Relay, geared toward putting pressure on China,
host of the 2008 Olympics, to use its influence over the Sudanese
government to stop the genocide in Darfur. China is Sudan’s chief
diplomatic sponsor, major weapons provider and largest foreign
investor.

An Olympic torch was lighted across the street from the church in
Minuteman Park in front of the Hartford State Armory, then passed
from one survivor to the next.

Among those watching was a real Olympian, Hannah Teter, who won a
gold medal in the snowboard halfpipe in Italy in 2006.

She said her experience at the games led her to take to heart an
Olympic ideal, that sport should be at the service of humanity. Teter
began to learn about Darfur after her mother in Vermont sent her an
e-mail about the situation. She flew to Hartford for the day from
California to participate in the event.

Violence has gripped Darfur for more than four years. Arab militias
dispatched by the central government in Khartoum have responded to
rebel attacks by attacking black civilians in Darfur. Hundreds of
thousands have been killed and millions displaced as systematic rape
and the destruction of villages continues.

The U.S. government has labeled the killings as genocide, and this
summer the U.N. Security Council voted to send 26,000 peacekeepers
to the region.

Deacon Arthur Miller, director of the office of black Catholic
ministries for the Archdiocese of Hartford, said despite the efforts,
the killing continues.

"If there was an 11th commandment, it would be, `Thou shalt not be a
bystander,’" said Miller, who helped organize the event. "We cannot
watch this happen and be silent."

Sara Anderson, the first to carry the torch Sunday, is the
great-granddaughter of survivors of the Armenian genocide, in which 1.5
million people were killed from 1915 to 1918. She recalled that her
great-grandmother, who lived to be 93, would speak in a "frightened,
broken whisper" when recounting her past. Her great-grandfather only
survived because he and his father hid beneath rotting corpses to
escape detection.

Fred Jacobs, 86, said he remembers seeing his mother, naked beneath a
coat, being led to a gas chamber at the Auschwitz concentration camp
in Poland.

"It’s a very, very tough time for me here today to hear what is
happening," he said after walking to the podium on frail legs.

Pholla Crahen spoke of surviving Cambodia’s killing fields, and Lagu
Androga spoke of fleeing as one of the Lost Boys of southern Sudan
during another wave of killings in the country in 1990, spending 10
years in refugee camps.

Thiery Iramboma’s parents fled genocide in Burundi in 1972 and raised
a family in Rwanda, where they were killed in a genocide in 1994.

Sponsored by the Catholic church, he arrived in Connecticut in May
after years of living in refugee camps in various countries.

Gabriel Bol Deng, also a Lost Boy, said it was a beautiful morning
in 1987 when, as a 9-year-old tending his father’s cattle, he heard
the sound of a gun shot for the first time and saw smoke rising from
his village.

He was running home when he was stopped by a villager who ignored his
pleas to let him return to his home. The man scooped him up to take
him to safety when more shots rang out and the man fell. He was dead,
and Deng said God put the thought in his young mind to pretend to be
dead, too.

Eventually, aided by strangers, he walked more than 1,000 miles over
four months, beginning a journey that eventually brought him to the
United States. He is now director of H.O.P.E for Sudan.

Each speaker invoked their experiences as a call to action for Darfur,
but perhaps the most powerful speech Sunday was also the shortest.

Miller introduced Mesudin Uzejrovic as a survivor of genocide in
Bosnia.

"I was 16 when I lost my father," he said.

He paused and hung his head, trying to gather himself, but to no avail.

With tears in his eyes, he waved his hands weakly, as if to ward
off the memories, then returned to his seat, covering his face with
his hands.

We’re Not In 2006 Anymore

WE’RE NOT IN 2006 ANYMORE
By Michael Barone

RealClearPolitics, IL
/were_not_in_2006_anymore.html
Oct 22 2007

Things are not working out as Democratic congressional leaders
expected. For the first eight months of this year, they struggled to
find some way to shut down the American military effort in Iraq.

They took it for granted that we were stuck in a quagmire in Iraq,
with continuous high casualties and very little to show for them.

They pressed hard to get the Republican votes they needed to block
a filibuster in the Senate and were cheered when some Republicans,
like John Warner, seemed to lean their way. They worked hard over
the August recess to pressure Republican House members to break ranks
and vote with them.

But the Republicans mostly held fast. Senate Minority Leader Mitch
McConnell skillfully parried their thrusts in the Senate. House
Minority Leader John Boehner persuaded most House Republicans to hang
on. Then, over the summer, the news out of Iraq started to get better.

Mainstream media types tend to think that, while rising casualties
from Iraq are legitimate news, falling casualties are not. But even
so the word got out: The surge strategy was producing results. Anbar
province, given up for lost in 2006, turned peaceful and cooperative
in 2007. U.S. casualties and Iraqi civilian casualties were down.

Brookings scholars Michael O’Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack, no fans
of the administration’s conduct of the war, announced on July 30
(in the pages of The New York Times, no less) that this was "a war
we might just win."

The congressional Democrats got ready for one more push in September.

But the testimony of General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan
Crocker cut the ground from under their feet. Now, Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid (who declared last spring that the war was lost) and
Speaker Nancy Pelosi seem to have thrown in the towel. The Democratic
Congress will not use its power to appropriate to end the surge or
to bring the soldiers home.

That leaves the left wing of the party angry at its leaders and the
party split on the war, much as it was in 2002, when about half of
congressional Democrats voted to authorize military action.

The Democrats here suffered from a lack of imagination. They could not
imagine that the United States military could perform more effectively
in 2007 than it did in 2005 and 2006.

George W. Bush seems to have had a similar lack of imagination until
the November 2006 elections woke him up. But he chose a new commander
and a new strategy, and things have changed. Democratic leaders have
acted on the assumption that the status quo of November 2006 would
persist indefinitely.

The Democrats have found themselves on the defensive on other issues,
as well. Last week, the House Democrats were forced to delay a vote on
their version of the revision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act, which among other things would have prohibited surveillance of
communications between suspected terrorists abroad and persons in
the United States without a court warrant.

The House Democrats were responsive to left-wingers’ theoretical
concerns about abusive surveillance and unconcerned that most voters
don’t want the National Security Agency to hang up when Osama bin Laden
calls the United States. In any case, they were undercut when Senate
Democrats agreed to a revision that did not contain that provision
and others unacceptable to the Bush administration.

The House Democratic leadership also backed down last week from its
determination to bring a resolution condemning the Turkish government’s
massacre of Armenians in 1915-16. The Turkish government took umbrage
at this, and its parliament voted to authorize military action in
Iraq’s Kurdish provinces against anti-Turkish Kurdish guerrillas —
a nightmare scenario in the one part of Iraq that has been consistently
peaceful and pro-American since 2003.

Senior House Democrats like John Murtha and Ike Skelton said the
resolution was a bad idea, and Nancy Pelosi reversed herself (as
Speaker Dennis Hastert did on the same issue in 2000, at the request
of Bill Clinton).

Democrats are coming face to face with the fact that there’s a war
on — and that Americans prefer success to failure. If the choice is
between stalemate and withdrawal, as it seemed to be in November 2006,
they may favor withdrawal; but if the choice is between victory and
withdrawal, they don’t want to quit — or to undermine the effort.

Last week, Democrat Niki Tsongas won a special election with only 51
percent of the vote, in a Massachusetts district where John Kerry won
57 percent in 2004 and would have run much better in 2006. History
doesn’t stand still — we’re not in 2006 anymore.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/10

Pandering Pelosi-crats

Washington Times
Editorial

Pandering Pelosi-crats

October 22, 2007

With all due respect to the Republican presidential hopefuls who
debated last night, perhaps the best argument for keeping the
Democrats out of power next November is the brazenly irresponsible way
they handle national security issues: behaving as if the major threat
to our national well-being is President Bush, not the jihadists, and
putting the political agenda of Turkey-bashing ethnic lobbies and the
hard left of the Democratic Party ahead of the war effort.

Exhibit number one is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who suffered twin
embarrassments last week: In one instance, Democrats, under pressure
>From left-wing bloggers and the ACLU, tried to bring to the floor
legislation updating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)
that would have crippled the ability of our intelligence agencies to
monitor al Qaeda and other foreign terrorist groups. They were forced
to pull that bill from the floor. In the second instance, a
mini-revolt among Democrats forced Mrs. Pelosi to remove from the
floor the Armenia genocide resolution that could do grave damage to
Washington’s relations with a key NATO ally, Turkey – which is
critically important in resupplying the 160,000-plus U.S. troops in
Iraq.

Last week we editorialized against both of these irresponsible pieces
of legislation, and temporarily at least, both have been stopped in
their tracks. The Democrats’ FISA bill, pushed by House Judiciary
Committee Chairman John Conyers of Michigan, and House Intelligence
Committee Chairman Silvestre Reyes of Texas, would have amended FISA
to grant due-process rights to aliens virtually anywhere in the world,
including Islamist radicals fighting us in places like Iraq and
Afghanistan. Demonstrating leadership at its best, House Republicans
led by Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio and Chief Deputy Whip Eric
Cantor of Virginia offered a motion to recommit the legislation with
instructions to prohibit the Democrats’ FISA measure from "interfering
with surveillance needed to prevent Osama bin Laden, Al Qaeda or any
other foreign terrorist organization" from attacking the United
States. This created a huge political problem for the Democrats, who
were forced to choose between 1) killing their own bill and 2) voting
against giving the government the authority to spy on Osama in Laden,
al Qaeda and other terrorist groups seeking to murder Americans.

In the end, Mrs. Pelosi and other politically savvy Democrats,
realizing that a vote for preserving Osama’s Fourth Amendment rights
might be difficult to explain to constituents in "fly-over country,"
pulled the bill from the floor. But the Democratic leadership’s FISA
bill may well get a second life. The ACLU and left-wing bloggers
believe the Democratic bill, known as the Restore Act, does not go far
enough in protecting the "civil liberties" of innocent jihadists, and
suggest that the Democrats are caving in to the Republicans on FISA.
These people are spoiling for fight, and House Majority Leader Steny
Hoyer, who has said the Democrats will try to bring the bill back this
week, may oblige them. In the next few days, we will learn whether Mr.
Hoyer is bluffing, or whether the Pelosi-crats are politically
suicidal enough to try to bully enough of the conservative, 47-member
Blue Dog Coalition of moderate and conservative Democrats into siding
with Osama on the FISA issue.

But lately, Democrats have become more assertive about standing up to
Mrs. Pelosi, particularly on the Armenia genocide resolution. Last
week, at least nine House Democrats urged her to withdraw the Armenia
resolution from the floor, and the speaker, in a belated nod to common
sense, said Wednesday that she was reconsidering her pledge to force a
vote on the measure. Given the explosive situation in northern Iraq
created by Kurdish PKK terrorist attacks against Turkey, it is
grotesquely irresponsible for Congress to be beating up on this
important American ally.

Source: ITORIAL/110220005

http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20071022/ED