La Russie dénonce un vote scandaleux à l’Eurovision

Russie-Azerbaïdjan-Eurovision-diplomatie
La Russie dénonce un vote scandaleux à l’Eurovision

(AFP) – Le chef de la diplomatie russe, Sergueï Lavrov, a dénoncé
mardi un vote `scandaleux` au concours de l’Eurovision, après
l’annonce par l’Azerbaïdjan que ses voix en faveur de la représentante
de la Russie n’avaient pas été prises en compte lors du calcul du
résultat final en Suède.

Selon les règles de ce concours très populaire, qui s’est tenu cette
année du 16 au 18 mai à Malmö (Suède), les téléspectateurs dans chacun
des 39 pays participants ont voté par texto ou par téléphone et leurs
voix ont été pondérées à 50/50 avec celles d’un jury professionnel.

Le ministre azerbaïdjanais des Affaires étrangères, Elmar Mammadyarov,
a affirmé mardi que la Russie était arrivée en deuxième position dans
cette ex-république soviétique – c’est-à-dire, avait obtenu 10 points
– , alors que selon les résultats annoncés en Suède, l’Azerbaïdjan
avait attribué `zéro points` à la Russie.

`Quand on vole 10 points à notre représentante, cela ne peut pas nous
ravir`, a déclaré M. Lavrov, lors d’une conférence de presse commune
avec M. Mammadyarov.

`Où sont parties ces voix, comment elles ont disparu – c’est une
question à poser à notre télévision publique`, a indiqué pour sa part
M. Mammadyarov. M. Lavrov a appelé la télévision publique
azerbaïdjanaise à faire toute la lumière sur ce qui s’est passé.

`Nous allons coordonner nos actions communes pour que cet acte
scandaleux ne reste pas sans réponse`, a-t-il souligné.

Lundi, le directeur de la chaîne publique azerbaïdjanaise ayant
retransmis l’Eurovision, Camil Guliyev, s’était déclaré `très
préoccupé et surpris` par le décompte des résultats, en affirmant que
la chanteuse russe Dina Garipova avait obtenu de très bonnes notes en
Azerbaïdjan.

Les 10 points de l’Azerbaïdjan n’auraient cependant pas changé la
position de la Russie, arrivée cinquième dans le classement définitif
de l’Eurovision, 17 points derrière la représentante de la Norvège.

Pour sa part, la Russie avait donné la note la plus élevée – 12 points
– au représentant d’Azerbaïdjan à l’Eurovision, qui a obtenu la
deuxième place.

En 2012, l’Azerbaïdjan a déjà accueilli en grande pompe cette
compétition regardée par plus de 100 millions de téléspectateurs à
travers le monde.

mercredi 22 mai 2013,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

Israel, Turkey and gas

Israel, Turkey and gas

By JPOST EDITORIAL

05/18/2013 23:09

It is becoming evident that a veiled agenda underpinned the recent Turkish
willingness to consider a rapprochement with Israel.

Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan. Photo: REUTERS/Stringer
Word is that both Israel and Turkey are seriously entertaining the notion
of constructing an undersea pipeline to deliver Israeli natural gas to
Turkey and, perhaps, hence to Europe.

The Turks reportedly have expressed willingness to foot part of the
estimated $2 billion bill. Such pipelines exist elsewhere in the world,
most notably from Russia and from Norway.

It is becoming evident that a veiled agenda underpinned the recent Turkish
willingness to consider a rapprochement with Israel. Turkey, it appears,
hankers after Israeli gas. The perceived Turkish softening was fueled by
Israel’s offshore gas discoveries, a fact which nevertheless did not impel
Ankara to forgo humiliating Israel.

Turkey grows increasingly dependent on Russia for its gas supplies. This
hardly instills joy in Turkish hearts, especially considering the fact that
Moscow and Ankara are at direct loggerheads over Syria. Israel, having
repeatedly proven itself both reliable and exceedingly pliable, is now
regarded as a safer bet for Turkish gas supplies – certainly safer than
such alternatives to Russia as Iran. Moreover, Israeli gas could be had at
a significantly lower cost.

But this is not all as rosy as meets the eye. Whereas Israel is
incontrovertibly a dependable business partner, can we can count on Turkey?
Still searing are memories of our own gas purchases from Egypt. The Muslim
Brotherhood takeover in Cairo abruptly terminated this mutually beneficial
deal. There is no guarantee that Turkey would not go the same route,
particularly given its about-turn against Israel a few years ago and the
festering danger that it too might be a candidate for an even more extreme
Islamic transformation than the one it has already undergone.

In other words, the mooted arrangement hinges almost entirely on Turkish
goodwill, and that goodwill can by no stretch of the imagination be taken
for granted.

Then, as was the case with Egypt, there is the matter of the pipeline’s
security. Israel’s gas purchases from Egypt were doomed when the Sinai
pipeline was serially sabotaged. Can a pipeline that runs parallel to the
Lebanese and Syrian coasts be assumed to be invulnerable? Last, but hardly
least, is Cyprus. A deal with Turkey would undermine cooperation already
fostered with the Cypriot Greeks, whose own gas discoveries are anathema to
Ankara which occupies the northern parts of the island. Do we really want
to ditch Cyprus in favor of an unpredictable and hardly friendly business
partner? Pipelines can also be built in the Cypriot direction and another
possibility is liquefying the gas and transporting it to Europe by tankers.
It may be more expensive but this would be offset by the removal of
pipeline security concerns. Also, Cyprus has allocated land for a
liquefaction plant, which would relieve Israel of another safety headache.

There is of course a wholly different alternative – avoiding exports to
Europe altogether and with them the undesirable competition with the
ruthless Russians.

Israel can earmark its exports for the Far East, where it can net far
greater revenue. This would mean a pipeline to Eilat, a gas liquefaction
plant in the South and shipping therefrom in tankers.

In short, Israel is not without export alternatives.

Attractive as reinforced ties and renewed cooperation with Turkey might be,
we need to resist temptation.

Turkey’s rulers are closely allied to the Muslim Brotherhood and that bodes
ill for Israel.

If approved, the gas pipeline could prove one of Israel’s biggest-ever
strategic errors.

We cannot entrust this prized export – one that could overhaul our
financial viability – to Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s hands. The thought that he
would be granted an extortionist stranglehold over our economic future
should send shivers down all our spines.

To this must be added the question of our national honor. We might belittle
its importance, but this is not how national honor is viewed in the Islamic
world, of which Turkey is a part.

We would do much better either by avoiding Europe as an export destination
or by teaming up with non-Muslim partners who are not hostile and who need
our business.

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Editorials/Israel-Turkey-and-gas-313566

Lebanon’s Manoogian Collection

Saudi ARAMCO World
May/June 2013

Fifty-two years ago, as Soviet cosmonauts and US astronauts were first
venturing into space, another space program was also taking off – in
Lebanon.

Yes, in the early 1960’s, the country of 1.8 million people,
one-quarter the size of Switzerland, was launching research rockets
that reached altitudes high enough to get the attention of the Cold
War superpowers.

But the Lebanese program was more about attitude than altitude:
Neither a government nor a military effort, this was a science club
project founded by a first-year college instructor and his
undergraduate students. And while post-Sputnik amateur rocketry was on
the rise, mostly in the us, no amateurs anywhere won more public
acclaim than the ones in Lebanon.

MANOUGIAN COLLECTION
Manoug Manougian, right, with members of the Haigazian College Rocket
Society, which he founded in 1960. It later became the Lebanese Rocket
Society.

But that is forgotten history now, says Manoug Manougian, now 77 and a
mathematics professor at the University of Southern Florida in Tampa.
He leads me into a conference room where he has set out on a table
file boxes filled with half-century-old newspapers, photographs and
16mm film reels.

`When I decided to leave, no one was interested to take care of all
this,’ says Manougian. `But I felt, even at that point, that it was a
part of Lebanese history.’

TOP: MANOUGIAN COLLECTION
Above: Manougian now teaches at the University of Southern Florida,
where he keeps newspaper front pages on his office wall. `It was a
part of Lebanese history,’ he says. Top: The Society launched its
first `tiny baby rockets’ at the mountain farm of one of its members.
Born in the Old City of Jerusalem, Manougian won a scholarship to the
University of Texas, and he graduated in 1960 with a major in math.
Right away, Haigazian College in Beirut was glad to offer him a job
teaching both math and physics. The college also made him the faculty
advisor for the science club, which Manougian reoriented by putting up
a recruitment sign that asked, `Do you want to be part of the
Haigazian College Rocket Society?’

He did this, he explains, because even as a boy, he loved the idea of
rockets. He recalls taking penknife in hand and carving into his desk
images of rocket ships flying to the moon. `It’s the kind of thing
that stays with you,’ Manougian says.

John Markarian, former head of the college, now 95, recalls thinking
it was `a rather harmless student activity. What a wonderful thing it
was.’ The first rocket, he says, `was the size of a pencil.’

Six students signed up, and in November 1960, the Haigazian College
Rocket Society (hcrs) was born. `It is not a matter of just putting
propellant in the tube and lighting it,’ says Manougian. Former hcrs
member Garo Basmadjian explains that at the time, `we didn’t have much
knowledge, so we looked at ways to increase the thrust of the rocket
by using certain chemicals.’ After dismissing gunpowder, they settled
on sulfur and zinc powders. Then they would pile into Manougian’s
aging Oldsmobile and head to the family farm of fellow student Hrair
Kelechian, in the mountains, where they would try to get their
aluminum tubes to do, well, anything.

`We had a lot of failures, really,’ says Basmadjian.

MANOUGIAN COLLECTION
1963 saw the launch of Cedar 3, a three-stage rocket that allegedly
broadcast “Long Live Lebanon” from its nose cone as it rose. Left: The
Cedar launches were commemorated on this postage stamp issued on
Lebanon’s independence day.

MANOUGIAN COLLECTION
But soon enough `it did fly some distance,’ Manougian adds.

The hcrs began using a pine-forested mountain northeast of Beirut to
shoot off the `tiny baby rockets,’ as Manougian calls them, each no
longer than half a meter (19″).

As they experimented, the rockets grew larger. By April 1961, two
months after the first manned Soviet orbital mission, the college’s
entire student body of 200 drove up for the launch of a rocket that
was more than a meter long (40″).

The launch tube aimed the rocket across an unpopulated valley, but at
ignition, Manougian recalls, the thrust pushed the `very primitive’
launcher backward, in the opposite direction, and instead of arcing up
across the valley, the rocket blazed up the mountain behind the
students.

MANOUGIAN COLLECTION
Launches at the military site of Dbayea, overlooking the Mediterranean
north of Beirut, drew crowds of spectators, journalists and
photographers.
`We had no idea what lay in that direction,’ says Manougian. To
investigate, the students started climbing, and on arrival at the
Greek Orthodox church on the peak, they came on puzzled priests
staring at the remains of the rocket, which had impacted the earth
just short of the church’s great oaken doors. Manougian calculated
that, even with the unplanned launch angle, considering thrust and
landing point, the rocket had reached an altitude of about a kilometer
(3300′), and he adds the bold claim that this was the first modern
rocket launched in the Middle East.

MANOUGIAN COLLECTION
Ballistics expert Lt. Youssef Wehbe (in uniform) began supporting the
rocket society in 1961, initially by allowing it access to an
artillery range on Mount Sannine.
The next day, Manougian got a call from Lieutenant Youssef Wehbe of
the Lebanese military. He cautioned that the hcrs couldn’t just go up
any old mountainside and shoot off rockets. They could, however, do it
as much as they wished under controlled conditions at the military’s
artillery range on Mt. Sannine. Wehbe, also in his 20’s, was a
ballistics expert, and he was more than intrigued. `Our first
success,’ says Manougian, came there at Mt. Sannine, where the rocket
they demonstrated for Wehbe soared 2.3 kilometers (7400′) into the
air.

Newspapers got wind of the launches, and they reported that the `Cedar
2C’ (named for the symbol of Lebanon) had reached 14.5 kilometers
(47,500′). `Obviously, that’s not yet the moon distance of 365,000
kilometers. But the Lebanese aren’t after that, they’re after
technique,’ stated the report.

Under Wehbe’s supervision, hcrs developed two-stage and then
three-stage rockets, each bigger than the last and soaring higher and
farther.

In the papers, the rocket men were portrayed as both brawny and
brainy, and they were the talk of Lebanon. A fan club of prominent
Lebanese – mostly women – formed the Comité d’encouragement du Groupe
Haigazian. In the photos and films of the launches, one can see
generals deferring to college kids in hcrs hardhats and eagerly posing
in the press photos with them. Even Lebanese president Fuad Chehab
invited Manougian and his students to the palace for a photo op.

`We were just having fun and doing something we all wanted to do,’
says Basmadjian. `When the president came into the picture and gave us
some money, it took off.’

Three thousand years ago, the Phoenicians, who lived on today’s
Lebanese coast but traded as far away as England, were pioneers of
celestial navigation using Polaris, the North Star, recognized by
other cultures as the `Phoenician star.’

Today, natives of Lebanon are helping lead the way to the stars.

`As a child in Lebanon, I was an avid reader of books about Sinbad,
Ali Baba, Ibn Battuta, Captain Cook, Magellan and Columbus, wondering
how exciting it was for these explorers to anticipate what they were
going to see and discover,’ says Charles Elachi, who for 12 years has
directed the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. `I
lead a team of 5000 explorers in defining objectives that seem almost
impossible, then going ahead and implementing them. In the last few
decades, we have visited every planet in the solar system and
discovered volcanoes on Io, geysers on Enceladus, lakes on Titan and
river beds on Mars.’

At Princeton University, Edgar Choueiri is director and chief
scientist of the Electric Propulsion and Plasma Dynamics Laboratory.
`Plasma rockets differ from chemical rockets, which were the focus of
the Haigazian group and which have been the standard means for
launching and propelling spacecraft into space,’ he says. The rockets
Choueiri is developing use magnetic fields and electrically charged
gases (plasmas) to produce thrust, and they are intended for cargo and
manned missions to the moon and Mars. The first toy Choueiri remembers
from his childhood in Lebanon was a water-propelled rocket that he
launched with his father. `It was a poetic moment for me when, decades
later, I found myself working, under nasa funding, on a plasma rocket
concept that uses water as propellant,’ he says.

George Helou is the director of the Infrared Processing and Analysis
Center at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), also in
Pasadena, California, and of nasa’s Herschel Science Center. He says
it was one of his teachers at the American University of Beirut,
Pierre Monoud, who was also a faculty advisor to the lrs, who
`encouraged me to pursue astrophysics.’ Helou has provided research
and management for every major infrared astronomy project launched by
nasa and the European Space Agency. He researches galaxies, and in
particular how they turn gas and dust into stars. `The starry nights
of Lebanon’s mountains attracted me to the cosmos,’ says Helou.
`Astrophysics has been and still is a wonderful journey.’

LEFT: JET PROPULSION LABORATORY / CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY;
CENTER: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY; RIGHT: EPPDYL / PRINCETON UNIVERSITY

`We were members of a scientific society. We felt good about it,’ says
Simon Aprahamian, another former student. `But it didn’t feel like
what the us or ussr were doing. It’s a small country, Lebanon. People
felt, `This is something happening in our country. Let’s get
involved.”

Launches now drew hundreds of spectators to the site overlooking the
Mediterranean Sea at Dbayea, north of Beirut, and Haigazian itself
became known as `Rocket College.’ As the hcrs was now the country’s
pride, its name changed to the Lebanese Rocket Society (lrs).

ABOVE AND BELOW: MANOUGIAN COLLECTION
Cedar 4 was the society’s most powerful rocket. newspapers claimed
that it reached a maximum height between 145 and 200 kilometers
(90-125 mi), though the reality was surely much less. For Manougian,
however, the rockets and their launches were not about setting
records, but about teaching future scientists.

Lebanese weren’t the only ones watching. Both superpowers, according
to Manougian, had `cultural attachés’ observing the launches, and he
believes they did more than that. `My papers were always out of place
on my desk,’ he says, and he recalls once leaving a note: `My filing
cabinet I am leaving open. I have nothing to hide. But please don’t
mess up my desk!’

One night in 1962, Manougian was taken in the back of a limousine to a
factory in the heart of downtown Beirut. There, he was introduced to
Shaykh Sabah bin Salim Al-Sabah of Kuwait, who offered to fund
Manougian’s experiments generously if he moved them to Kuwait.
Manougian hesitated, recalling the commitment he made to himself when
he accepted the post at Haigazian: `Don’t stay too long. You only have
a bachelor’s degree.’ More than a private lab, Manougian wanted to get
back to Texas to get his master’s.

Before Manougian left for Texas, however, he sat down with Wehbe to
plan two launches for Lebanese Independence Day, November 21, in both
1963 and 1964. The rockets would be called Cedar 3 and Cedar 4, and
each would have three stages. They would dwarf what went before in
both size and strength: seven meters (22′) long, weighing in at 1270
kilograms (2800 lbs) and capable of rising an estimated 325 kilometers
(200 mi) and covering a range of nearly 1000 kilometers (about 620
mi), the rockets would generate some 23,000 kilograms (50,000 lbs) of
thrust to hit a top speed of 9000 kilometers per hour (5500 mph). From
the nose cone, a recording of the Lebanese national anthem would be
broadcast.

Today, historians regard it as more likely that the rocket was
accidentally discovered, rather than invented, by the Chinese during
the Sung Dynasty between 960 and 1279 ce. And although historians have
pinpointed reports of `rockets’ used in 13th-century battles, Frank H.
Winter, curator emeritus of the Smithsonian Institution’s Air and
Space Museum in Washington, D.C., sees them as isolated incidents of
the use of `gunpowder-type weapons’ and not necessarily rockets, which
are distinguished, he says, by being self-propelled.

There is an intriguing manuscript, dating from between 1270 and 1280,
written by a Syrian military engineer named Hasan al-Rammah. His book,
Al-Furusiyya wa al-Manasib al-Harbiyya (The Book of Military
Horsemanship and Ingenious War Devices), describes uses for gunpowder
as well as the first process for the purification of potassium
nitrate, a key ingredient. He also includes 107 recipes for gunpowder
and 22 recipes for rockets, which he called al-siham al-khatai
(`Chinese arrows’). Al-Rammah astonishes any contemporary reader by
describing and illustrating one rocket-propelled device that looks
like a scarab beetle. He called it `the egg which moves itself and
burns.’ Comprised of two pans fastened together and filled with
`naphtha, metal filings and good mixtures’ (likely containing
saltpeter), it had two rudders and was propelled by a large rocket. It
seems to have been designed to ride on the surface of the water as a
kind of torpedo.

Ahmad Yousef al-Hassan, the late scholar of Islamic technology,
concluded that this book `cannot be the invention of a single person,’
and thus the `al-Rammah rocket’ could possibly be an even earlier
invention.

Was it history’s first rocket? `This is really hard to pin down
exactly,’ says Winter. `Its appearance in the work of al-Rammah shows
that the rocket was known in the Arab world by … about 1280.’ He
adds that al-Rammah `clearly used `Chinese materials,’ i.e., terms and
sources.’ Thus, at the very least, the knowledge of gunpowder and
rockets in the Eastern Mediterranean would argue for the exchange of
scientific knowledge among the leading civilizations of the time.

On November 21, 1963, a model of Cedar 3 was paraded through Beirut’s
streets to great applause. The cover of the souvenir booklet shows a
rocket overflying the city. For Cedar 4, Lebanon issued commemorative
postage stamps showing the rocket leaving Earth’s atmosphere. On
launch day, 15,000 people showed up, along with generals and even the
president.

MANOUGIAN COLLECTION
In those years, Manougian recalls, the “rocket boys” were celebrities
and Haigazian College was “rocket college.” Above, Manougian answers a
journalist’s questions after a launch. The last rocket, Cedar 10, flew
in 1967, after Manougian had returned to the us to earn his doctorate.
Then, Cold War politics shut down the program.
The newspapers reported with national pride that the rockets flew into
`space’ and landed on the far side of Cyprus. The altitudes that were
published varied from 145 to 200 kilometers (90-125 mi). The actual
figures, however, are likely more modest. `That was totally wishful,’
says Ed Hart, the Haigazian physics professor who took over as faculty
advisor to the lrs. `It never came close. We kept our mouths shut
[because] it was not a student matter anymore. It had become a social,
society kind of matter.’

For Manougian, Wehbe told him that according to calculations, the
rockets achieved their aims. Hart, whose specialty is science
education, brings it back to empirical achievement: `We were teaching
students a great deal, and that is what we came for: the mystery and
structure of forces.’

In 1964, master’s degree in hand, Manougian returned to Lebanon, and
again collaborated with Wehbe on a few more launches. By then, world
powers were interested: France supplied the rocket fuel; the us
invited Wehbe to Cape Canaveral.

Cedar 8 was the last lrs rocket. Launched in 1966, it was a two-stage,
5.7-meter (18′) rocket with a range of 110 kilometers (68 mi) – a long
way from the pencil-sized rockets of five years earlier. `We were
launching in the evening, and we put lights on top of the second stage
to be able to witness the separation. There were no hitches. It took
off beautifully, the separation was fairly obvious, nothing exploded
and it landed at the time it was supposed to land. To me that was a
perfect launch,’ says Manougian, still in awe 50 years on.

Under Manougian’s guidance, a new rocket society at usf is exploring
rockets that use plasma engines.
By 1966 Manougian grew concerned about the extent of military
involvement. `I’d accomplished what I’d come there to accomplish. It
was time for me to get my doctoral degree and do what I love most,
which was teaching,’ he says. He left in August, and the Lebanese
Rocket Society was no more.

But under military auspices, a last Lebanese rocket, Cedar 10, flew in
1967. According to Manougian, Wehbe told him that French president
Charles de Gaulle soon pressured President Chehab to shut down the
rocket project for geopolitical reasons.

Decades of political turbulence followed, and the story of the lrs lay
hidden away in Manougian’s boxes.

Two years ago, science and engineering students at the University of
Southern Florida approached Manougian to set up a rocket society. `My
students did this 50 years ago,’ he replied, adding, `What can you do
now that’s innovative?’ That’s how he became faculty advisor of the
Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry (soar), which is exploring rockets
powered by electromagnetism and nano-materials. As in Beirut, he says,
`the important thing is not the rocket. It is the scientific venture.’

`Soar’ is an apt metaphor for all involved. With the hcrs/lrs rocket
projects, Lebanon punched well above its weight. Wehbe retired as a
brigadier general. Manougian went on to win teaching awards, and he is
loved by his students now as then. Many of the lrs students, and
others inspired by them, went on to excel in scientific pursuits.

`Most of us come from very humble beginnings. But we had some brains
and we studied hard,’ says Basmadjian.

`Did that experience help with regard to making new inventions?’ asks
another former student, Hampar Karageozian, who later studied at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology and founded several
ophthalmological drug companies. `Yes, it did. Because it completely
changed my attitude. The attitude that we could say that nothing is
impossible, we really have to think about things, we really have to
try things. And it might work!’

Sheldon Chad ([email protected]) is an award-winning screenwriter and
journalist for print and radio. From his home in Montreal, he travels
widely in the Middle East, West Africa, Russia and East Asia. He will
be reporting from Chad for his next story for Saudi Aramco World.

See Photos at

http://www.saudiaramcoworld.com/issue/201303/the.forgotten.apogee.of.lebanese.rocketry.htm

PM: There will be no compensation for hail damage, there will be add

Prime Minister: There will be no compensation for hail damage, there
will be addressed support
Mon, 05/20/2013 – 17:03
News

There will be no compensation for the damage caused by hail in the
Armavir region, there will be support. In response to the question of
the secretary of `Heritage’ party Zaruhi Postanjian Prime Minister
Tigran Sargsyan said during May 20 session of the National Assembly.

The Prime Minister said that for the calculation of the damage caused
by hail, the working groups are getting acquainted with the situation
in the local communities.

By the way, the discussion devoted to the elimination of the effects
of hail is also appointed at the National Assembly. As the speaker of
the National Assembly Hovik Abrahamyan informed today, the discussion
will be held on Friday, May 24, at 14.00. The Minister of Agriculture
is also invited.

Author:
Factinfo

King of ruins

King of ruins

2013-05-20 20:12:50

Society against regime, and not opposing forces against acting regime. This
phenomenon pretends to be disastrous for the government and threatens its
existence altogether, at least for the next 5 years.

After parliamentary, presidential and municipal elections, citizens,
peasants come to fight, that is, systemic change in citizen’s
counsciousness wins habit of adaption, which has been continuously
accompanied and kept silent all.

Spontaneous protests in Byurakan, Armavir-Yerevan-Sevan highway, recently
in front of the Government building now just makes the carriers of the
regime and force to struggle just to survive it.

It is interesting that in case of all social riot cases, the society did
not have an obvious leader, which was typical of this process, and which
differs from the situation in previous similar situations. In this case the
leader is the social condition which strangleholds on society, and makes
authorities seriously prepare for the upcoming troubles.

The authorities overdo the plans, which would allow the government to take
role of the authorities for another 5 years, so they are set to fall. Of
course, there are ways, however, the achievement of which involves a
complex process and does not guarantee a successful completion.

And of course, that is why Defense Minister, Chief of Police reached
Yerevan-Sevan highway, and this prompted the Minister of Agriculture and
Governor of Armavir to reach Armavir- Yerevan highway, and even today,
that’s what prompted the Minister of Territorial Administration rushed to
Armavir.

In all these cases are only talking about danger for the Government, which
is growing day by day and proves, and it becomes impossible to stop this
danger.

It turns out that people get final shot, trying to completely eliminate the
regime, which was intended to protect and preserve peace and prosperity of
the country and the citizens, but instead we have what we have.

Who manages, he hits, but the country is being emptied day by day,
moreover, hour by hour, leaving the government and authorities to manage
the ruins and name Serzh Sargsyan King of ruins.

Gevorg Avetisyan

http://lurer.com/?p=101740&l=en

Memorial to perished freedom fighters unveiled in the village of Pat

Memorial to perished freedom fighters unveiled in the village of Patara

17:36 20.05.2013

On May 20 President of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic Bako Sahakyan
visited the village of Patara in Askeran region and partook in a
solemn ceremony of opening of the memorial to perished freedom
fighters.

In his speech the President stressed the importance of construction of
such monuments perpetuating the memory of heroes killed for the sake
of independence and freedom of the Motherland and thanked all those
who contributed to the implementation of this patriotic initiative.

Bako Sahakyan noted that the residents of the Patara village, who
devotedly fought in all the fronts of Artsakh and demonstrated
themselves as brave and courageous fighters, today continue to serve
in the Defense Army. He expressed confidence that the residents of the
village would continue to live and work with the same vigor to the
glory of the state and nation.

The President handed in state awards and valuable gifts to a group of
Artsakh Liberation War veterans, Central Information Department of the
Office of the NKR President reported.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2013/05/20/memorial-to-perished-freedom-fighters-unveiled-in-the-village-of-patara/

BAKU: Azerbaijani analyst dismisses Armenian FM’s statement

AzerNews, Azerbaijan
May 20 2013

Azerbaijani analyst dismisses Armenian FM’s statement

By Sara Rajabova

A document entitled ‘six principles’ does not and has never existed,
an Azerbaijani political analyst has told Trend news agency while
commenting on Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian’s recent
remarks on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

The director of the Center for Political Innovations and Technologies,
Mubariz Ahmadoglu, only made clear that the updated Madrid principles
— a peace outline proposed by the mediating OSCE Minsk Group
co-chairs which makes up the basis of the ongoing peace talks — have
an integral part which includes six clauses.

Recently, during his visit to France, the Armenian foreign minister
expressed Armenia’s readiness to sign the six basic principles of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict proposed by the Minsk Group “if the
co-chairs convince Azerbaijan to do the same.”
According to the analyst, Nalbandian’s statement made in Paris was
apparently the result of pressure on Yerevan exerted by France on the
issue of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

The updated Madrid principles, released in July 2009 on the website of
the US president in the form of a joint statement of the presidents of
the three co-chair countries, consist of a preamble, six articles and
a summary, Ahmadoglu noted.

“The essence of this document is that part of the occupied Azerbaijani
territories should be freed immediately and Nagorno-Karabakh will be
gradually returned to Azerbaijan. Now, in order not to look guilty in
the eyes of Armenians, Nalbandian changed the name of the updated
Madrid principles to ‘Six Principles’,” Ahmadoglu said.

Two purposes could be behind Nalbandian’s statement, the analyst believes.

“First of all, the European Union is forcing Armenia to sign the
updated Madrid principles. Armenia is having to reckon with the EU. If
Armenia signs the updated Madrid principles, the EU will hold a donor
conference which is expected to collect aid for Armenia in the amount
of 1.5 billion euros. Second, by renaming the updated Madrid
principles into ‘Six Principles’, Nalbandian wants to upset Azerbaijan
to make the latter refuse to sign the document. Eventually Armenia
would convince the EU that it is Azerbaijan, not Armenia, which does
not want to sign the updated Madrid principles,” Ahmadoglu added.

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict emerged in 1988 when Armenia made
territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Since a lengthy war in the
early 1990s that displaced over one million Azerbaijanis, Armenian
armed forces have occupied over 20 percent of Azerbaijan’s
internationally recognized territory, including Nagorno-Karabakh and
seven adjacent regions. The UN Security Council has adopted four
resolutions on Armenia’s withdrawal from the Azerbaijani territory,
but Armenia has not followed them to this day.

Russia, France and the U.S. – co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group – have
long been working to broker a solution of the conflict, but their
efforts have been largely fruitless so far.

The Madrid Principles envision a return of the territories surrounding
Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijani control; determining the final legal
status of Nagorno-Karabakh; a corridor linking Armenia to the region;
and the right of all internally displaced persons to return home.

BAKU: Turkish expert: `Azerbaijan has the right to intervene in the

APA, Azerbaijan
May 20 2013

Turkish expert: `Azerbaijan has the right to intervene in the attempt
to resettle Syrian Armenians in Nagorno Karabakh’

[ 20 May 2013 11:29 ]
ASALA terrorist organization’s attempt to take the stage again is a
part of the Armenians’ smear campaign against Turkey to be
strengthened in 2015

Istanbul. Mayis Alizadeh – APA. `The ASALA terrorist organization’s
attempt to take the stage again is a part of the Armenians’ smear
campaign against Turkey to be strengthened in 2015,’ head of Center
for Strategic Studies of Bahcesehir University, specialist on the
fight against terrorism Ercan Citlioglu told to APA’s Turkey bureau.

`Processes in Syria made ASALA terrorist organization issue a
statement against Turkey after a long period of time. Answering the
question `Nothing was heard about this terrorist organization for a
long time, what is the reason for its re-emergence?’, Ercan Citlioglu
said `I estimate it as a part of the Armenians’ smear campaign against
Turkey on a global scale in 2015. There are 400 000 – 500 000
Armenians in Syria, Turkey want the Armenians to live in a democratic
atmosphere like other ethnic minorities. This serious attempt of the
ASALA terrorist organization aims to turn the world against Turkey by
taking advantage of the situation in the region. This is blackmail
against Turkey.”

There are claims that in case of Syria’s collapse, some of the local
Armenians can be resettled in Nagorno Karabakh. Elcan Citlioglu
regarded this as an absurd: `This is completely absurd. The entire
word recognized the occupation of Azerbaijan’s territories by Armenia
and the UN Security Council has passed 4 resolutions on unconditional
withdrawal of forces from the occupied lands. Azerbaijan has the right
to intervene in the attempt to resettle in Nagorno Karabakh the
Armenians not only from Syria, but also from anywhere and change
demographic situation there. The world community can not admit it.’

The experienced expert also commented on the possibility of the
reactivation of ASALA terrorist organization taking advantage of the
situation in the region: `ASALA terrorist organization killed 35
Turkish diplomats in 1975-85 and was abolished after a number of
terrorist attacks against Turks. In the mid 90s, Armenians carried out
activities at the world parliaments and municipal assemblies to
achieve the international recognition of their claims on the so-called
`Armenian genocide’. I don’t assume that Armenians will further use
the method of terrorism against Turks.’

Terms of supply of Belarusian farm machines to Armenia discussed in

Belarusian Telegraph Agency, Belarus
May 20 2013

Terms of supply of Belarusian farm machines to Armenia discussed in Minsk

20.05.2013 18:19

MINSK, 20 May (BelTA) – The terms of supply of Belarusian farm
machines to Armenia were discussed in a meeting at the Industry
Ministry on 20 May between Belarus’ Industry Minister Dmitry
Katerinich and First Deputy Agriculture Minister of Armenia Grigory
Bagiyan, BelTA learnt from the press service of the Industry Ministry.

Grigory Bagiyan expressed his interest in visiting a number of
enterprises of the Industry Ministry to discuss the types and terms of
delivery of Belarus’ farm machines to Armenia. The sides have also
reviewed other matters of bilateral trade and economic cooperation
between the ministries of the two countries and the prospects of the
implementation of joint projects.

Partaking in the meeting was Armen Khachatryan, Ambassador
Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Armenia to Belarus and Permanent
Plenipotentiary Representative of Armenia to statutory and other CIS
bodies. Other participants were representatives of banks of the two
countries, including the Central Bank of Armenia, heads of leasing
companies and agricultural holdings of Belarus such as
Bobruiskagromash and Lidselmash.

In 2012 trade between the companies of Belarus’ Industry Ministry with
Armenia totaled $10.2 million, up 1.9 times as against 2011. Belarus’
export reached $9.8 million. The major exporters to Armenia were
BelAZ, MTZ, MAZ, BATE, Mogilevliftmash and other companies of the
industrial branch.

http://news.belta.by/en/news/econom?id=715653

L’objection de conscience fait debat

Amnesty International – Suisse
21 mai 2013

L’OBJECTION DE CONSCIENCE FAIT DÉBAT

Le droit à la le droit à liberté de pensée, de conscience et de
religion inclue-t-elle l’objection de conscience au service militaire
? La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (CEDH) a estimé que oui.
Malgré cela, trois États européens (Arménie, Azerbaïdjan et Turquie)
ne reconnaissent toujours pas ce droit. Il est grand temps qu’ils le
fassent.

Dans Bayatyan vs Arménie (2011), La Cour a statué en faveur de Vahan
Bayatyan, qui a été condamné à une peine d’emprisonnement après avoir
refusé d’effectuer son service militaire pour des motifs de
conscience. Une série d’arrêts contre la Turquie ont suivi, y compris
Erçep vs Turquie (2011). Malgré l’exigence de la Cour concernant la
reconnaissance du droit à l’objection de conscience, les responsables
gouvernementaux turcs ont déclaré qu’ils n’appliqueraient pas la
décision. Selon les déclarations du gouvernement, le droit à
l’objection de conscience ne sera reconnu que lorsque la Turquie aura
créé une armée professionnelle et mis un terme au système actuel de
conscription. La Turquie n’a pas appliqué l’arrêt de la Cour
européenne des droits de l’homme rendu en 2006 (Ülke vs Turquie), qui
impose aux autorités de modifier la loi pour empêcher les poursuites
répétées et l’emprisonnement des objecteurs de conscience.

De son côté, Azerbaïdjan n’a pas honoré son engagement de libérer les
objecteurs de conscience emprisonnés dans les deux ans suivant son
adhésion au Conseil de l’Europe, en 2000. Bien que la Constitution de
l’Azerbaïdjan prévoit un service de remplacement, aucune législation
appropriée n’a été adoptée pour assurer l’application du droit à
l’objection de conscience. Les autorités azerbaïdjanaises cherchent à
justifier le retard dans l’adoption d’une loi sur le service
alternatif en invoquant le conflit non résolu du Haut-Karabakh, avec
l’Arménie.

Ce même argument est utilisé par l’Arménie, où de jeunes pratiquants
continuent d’être emprisonnés, toujours en plus grand nombre et plus
longtemps, parce que leurs convictions leur interdisent d’accomplir un
quelconque service militaire. En tant que membre du Conseil de
l’Europe, l’Arménie a également pris l’engagement de fournir une
alternative civile au service militaire obligatoire. Toutefois, le
service de remplacement de l’Arménie est toujours sous le contrôle de
l’armée, ce qui le rend incompatible avec les principes de plusieurs
groupes, notamment les témoins de Jehova.

Amnesty International appelle les gouvernements de la Turquie, de
l’Azerbaïdjan et de l’Arménie à honorer leurs engagements régionaux.
Ils doivent également veiller à ce que toute alternative au service
militaire soit véritablement civile, et que sa durée ne présente pas
un caractère punitif. Toutes les personnes emprisonnées en raison de
leur refus d’accomplir le service militaire pour des raisons de
conscience ou de conviction profonde doivent être libérées
immédiatement.

http://www.amnesty.ch/fr/pays/europe-asie-centrale/armenie/documents/2013/lobjection-de-conscience-fait-debat