Serzh Sargsyan invited to Supreme Eurasian Economic Council’s meetin

Haykakan Zhamanak: Serzh Sargsyan invited to Supreme Eurasian Economic
Council’s meeting

11:20 27/05/2014 >> DAILY PRESS

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan has received an invitation to attend
a meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council on May 29, Haykakan
Zhamanak writes. However, there is no information about whether or not
he will participate, head of the Department of Integration of Eurasian
Economic Commission Viktor Spasky told Haykakan Zhamanak on Monday,
adding that he is not well informed of the organizational issues
concerning the meeting.

“I am informed that there has been an invitation, but I do not know
who will participate and in what format,” he said in response to the
question of whether Serzh Sargsyan will participate in the meeting.

Source: Panorama.am

Those Nights In Nairobi

Outlook
May 24 2014

Those Nights In Nairobi

>From early seafarers to a globalised people, overseas Gujaratis are
etched as a distinct type

by Pranay Sharma

Seafaring Gujaratis are known to have engaged with the outside world
for centuries. Gujaratis have had trade links with the ancient Romans,
Persians, Chinese and Egyptians. It may have been a Kutchi sailor, by
the name of Kanji Malam, who escorted Vasco da Gama from the Kenyan
coast to India. So, as the era of colonialism began, a Gujarati was
best qualified to be there at the inauguration. This zeal for outbound
trade has taken them, in recent times, to far ends of the world. Even
so, it might make eyes pop, in India and beyond, when we are told that
rock star Freddie Mercury, actor Ben Kingsley, conductor Zubin Mehta,
Pakistani wri-ter Bapsi Sidhwa, the statuesque Persis Khambatta and
acid-jazz singer Asha Puthli are Gujaratis or have some links with
Gujarat. An impressive diasporic roster, yes–but you do not expect it,
even in a jocular aside, to be stretched up to the doorstep of the
British royal family. If reports from June 2013 are to be believed,
Prince William and his brother, Andrew, have links to Gujarat.

Here’s the back story. Trace William’s matriliny, via Lady Di, all the
way to seven generations back, and you reach Eliza Kewark. Of
Armenian-Indian origin, Eliza was the hou-sekeeper of Theo-dore
Forbes, a Scottish merchant who worked for the East India Company in
Surat. Thus, dna research has offered reason for Diana and her sons to
be smuggled into the bulging pantheon of Non-Resident Gujaratis
(NRGS)!

Not that this roster needs any burnishing. The larger story of the
high-achieving Gujarati diaspora is one that reaches deep into
historical time, with unknown sailors making off from the
manufacturing and trading hubs in Gujarat from the days of the Indus
Valley Civilisation, and this involved cultural goods like printed
textiles, a connection that endures.

No wonder Gujaratis have had no qua-lms in crossing the ‘kaala paani’,
traditionally proscribed for savarna Indians, and it shows in the
lives of many of them. Gandhi’s two decades in South Africa are rather
well known. Dhirubhai Amb-ani, founder of Reliance Industries, spent
part of his formative years in Aden, including as an attendant in a
gas-filling station. And Freddie Merc-ury was born in Zanzibar–a
factor of the Gujarati settlements in British-held parts of Africa
since the 19th century, being everything from ordinary shopkeepers to
trading in gems and spices.

The story of the Gujarati diaspora, in this sense, differs largely
from the migratory patterns of other Indian communities. Indian-origin
people to be found in the old colonial holdings, especially from
eastern UP, Bihar, the Chhottanagpur plateau and parts of south India,
were largely taken as indentured labour. Gujaratis, on the contrary,
launched themselves into the outside world voluntarily, in the quest
for commerce and expansion of mercantile links. “Gujaratis have long
been part of the Indian Ocean trade networks and have looked at the
global economy as an opportunity rather than a threat, quite unlike
their counterparts in the east,” says Devesh Kapur of the University
of Pennsylvania.

True, with a 1,600-km long coastline, it’s also natural that these
links with the outside world through trade were fostered by local hubs
of great importance on the medieval Indian map. The Gulf of Cambay,
bang in the centre of flourishing, old sea trade routes that stretched
from China at one end and linked up with Persia, Aden and the
Euro-pean civilisations via the Red Sea in the ancient days, allowed
the port cities of Lothal, Bharuch, Cambay and Surat to develop over
two millennia. A deep Gujarati engagement with West Asia, East and
South Africa, and South-east Asia on the other side, and openness to a
certain multiculturalism, was a concomitant development.

But are there special traits Gujaratis have that distinguish them from
others in the Indian diaspora? “The very strong family ties and deep
cultural roots that helped build trust and networks distinguish
Gujaratis and have in turn been critical for their entrepreneurial
success,” says Kapur. As a leading expert on the Indian diaspora and
author of Diaspora, Development and Democracy, he poi-nts out that the
provision of access to cre-dit within the network rather than having
to seek recourse to the formal banking system also allowed Guj-a-ratis
to succeed and sustain business expansion even during times of crises.
Other commentators have noted that the community’s global renown in
business matters was such that a bill of credit issued by a Gujarati
merchant would be honoured as far as 5,000 miles away.

However, there was a marked acceleration in migration from the late
19th century, when Gujaratis began to go to East and South Africa and
parts of the Gulf. The destination seemed to change towards the West
after World War II and Independence. From the 1960s on, large number
of Indians, including many Gujaratis, went to the UK and the US. It
included droves of Gujaratis from East Africa, particularly from
Uganda when dictator Idi Amin expelled Indians who controlled the
country’s commerce.

Experts feel the expulsion from Uganda had an impact on Gujaratis,
especially those who went to the UK and later to the US (the Indian
government was reluctant to take them back). As they bounced back
through sheer resilience and talent, the West allowed Gujaratis to
break away from many of their typical professions. Thus, the
‘dukawalas’ or shopkeepers in Africa and UK and, later, the
Motel-Patels in the US, tried their hand in other businesses and
professions. Now, non-resident Gujaratis are one of the most affluent
and influential sections among nris, and many from these sections were
actively invo-lved as a strong diasporic element providing momentum
(and funds) to the Modi campaign.

“There was a lot of Gandhian idealism in my grandmother’s generation.
Then my mother’s generation turned more consumerist. Then came
globalisation in our time. It is the most globalised community in
India now,” says Vibhuti Patel of Mumbai’s SNDT University. Truly, in
a globalised world, the image of the stereotyped Gujarati is
challenged by those in politics, arts and entertainment, medicine,
information technology etc.

This section constitutes among the str-ongest Indian lobbies in the
US. Their aggressive lobbying dur-ing the 1999 Kar-gil war forced the
US to pressurise Pak-istan to vacate Indian territory. The irony is
that, after the 2002 riots, the Gujarati diaspora lobbied with their
gov-ernments to deny Modi a visa. Later, a key section supported him
in a bid to end his interna-tional isolation and did their bit to
reach out to Japan, Singapore, China and Rus-sia, ped-dling the
‘Gujarat model’ as a viable plan to engage with investors.

Many in the Gujarati diaspora will now naturally ramp up their voluble
support for Modi and bask in the glory of Gujarati pride, but we
should not be surprised if some of them continue to be against his
visit to the US. For in 2014, overseas Gujaratis are a disparate lot.

http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?290794

Loans from int’l organizations hardly serve the purpose – Vahagn Kha

Loans from international organizations hardly serve the purpose –
Vahagn Khachatryan

15:29 * 25.05.14

Loans borrowed from international organizations do not often serve the
purpose, economist Vahagn Khachatryan told Tert.am as he commented on
the signing of a $50 loan agreement between Armenia’s Ministry of
Finance and the World Bank.

Cooperating with international donors gives rise to a problem of how
well Armenia’s economy is capable of utilizing the loans and whether
resolving such problems is part of Armenia’s economic strategy.

“Loans are often borrowed because the World Bank grants them and our
government takes them out. And then we see they are hardly effective.
A glaring example is the loans taken out for corruption control and
raising efficiency of tax collection. But their effectiveness is
highly dubious,” Khachatryan said.

If problems could be resolved by means of loans, the WB loans could
only be welcomed especially since they are granted on favorable terms.

“The fact is that the aforementioned areas need additional funding.
But are loans the best means of resolving the problems? Is there not
an alternative, such as fundraising or more efficient use of available
funds?”

“Or the notorious Russian loan was never utilized. Funds were provided
to serve the loan, but were later returned to Russia. Actually, it was
only done for us to pay interests rather than to invest the funds in
Armenia’s economy. All this should be considered as a whole to
understand if Armenia has borrowed one more loan from the World Bank,”
Khachatryan said.

Asked about public control mechanisms, the economist said:

“The first mechanism is the National Assembly, the second is
transparency of processes. But in Armenia this all is only
declarations.

The public is the last to know about anything now because their
activities are not transparent. The National Assembly cannot even know
because the government provides as much information as it considers
necessary. And we learn about it too late,” Khachatryan said.

The following conclusion can be drawn from this: regularly borrowed
loans serve purposes different than officially declared.

Armenian News – Tert.am

Major Action Was Thwarted In Karabakh

Major Action Was Thwarted In Karabakh

Naira Hayrumyan, Political Commentator
Comments – Saturday, 24 May 2014, 23:41

Judging by hints of politicians and diplomats, a big action was
planned in Karabakh which was prevented by publishing the principles
of settlement that were initially unacceptable for the Armenians. The
American co-chair published them, and the result was the rejection of
the “principles of Madrid”.

One can judge the planned action by several statements. For instance,
the president of Iran Hassan Rowhani announced in Pekin that the
Russian-Iranian cooperation over the past few months has allowed
cutting threat of armed conflicts in the region.

Russia intended to deploy troops in Karabakh on the borders which will
be verified with Baku, return some territories to Azerbaijan, station
the troops on the border with Iran, unite the rest of Karabakh with
Armenia into the Customs Union or annex it altogether.

The recent statement by the NKR minister of defense Movses Hakobyan
indicates that such an action had been planned. “This year, for the
first time over the past five years, Azerbaijan has urged Russia to
mediate for maintaining the ceasefire. We have given our consent but
the enemy broke its word,” Movses Hakobyan said.

He said this year the Karabakhi side advanced 6-7 km in the region of
Haterk and occupied useful heights. And for the first time over these
years this year Azerbaijan failed to advance its positions.

Has Iran really succeeded preventing stationing of Russian
“peacekeepers”? Tehran has announced that change of borders is
unacceptable, and presence of foreign troops in the region cannot be
allowed. Iran’s statement may have made Russia and Azerbaijan to give
up their plans. And Azerbaijan blames the United States for thwarting
those plans.

The United States does not hide its reluctance for appearance of
Russian troops in the region. The U.S. ambassador to Azerbaijan
Richard Morningstar has recently opened the brackets.

“I think perhaps what’s changed is the calculation as to risk, as to
future interference with Azerbaijan. I’m not sure Azerbaijan has seen
it yet. It could see it in the future. I think the Putin trip to
Azerbaijan last summer was very interesting.”

“Obviously, I’m not in Putin’s mind. I was not part of those meetings.
Do you think that either Iran or Russia would like to have common
borders right now?

Russia and Iran may have “common borders” only in case the Russian
troops appear in Karabakh’s territories bordering with Iran.

Notably, Warlick’s points were approved by Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan’s
foreign minister Mammedyarov said Baku does not mind the presence of
peacekeepers in the conflict area. “Peacekeepers are necessary because
there is no confidence between the sides but it is necessary to ensure
people’s security, including of Azerbaijani resettlers.”

The entry of Russian forces to Karabakh may eventually put a full stop
to the prospect of opening the region and turn Armenia to an outcast.
For the time being, however, Iran and Europe are talking about layout
of infrastructures via Armenia and bringing the region under the
responsibility of the Euro-Atlantic community. In fact, by thwarting
the Russian-Azerbaijani deal on division of Karabakh (with Armenia’s
connivance), Iran and the West saved both Armenian states and reserved
their chance to integrate with the global system.

Maciej Bohosiewicz, the Chairman of the Polish-Armenian Chamber of
Commerce, has recently urged Armenia to become a bridge between Europe
and Iran. Armenia has not responded yet. However, when the terrible
action was being plotted, two important things took place. One was a
march against Putin was help in Yerevan, and, second, young people of
Karabakh rejected the principles of Madrid. Besides, the prospect of
membership of Armenia to the European Union is vague.

– See more at:

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/32475#sthash.sJaXsgcO.dpuf

Leyla Yunus: Azerbaijani authorities use family members of humanv ri

Leyla Yunus: Azerbaijani authorities use family members of human
rights defenders as hostages

15:12 24/05/2014 >> LAW

The head of Women’s Crisis Center, Azerbaijani human rights defender
Matanat Azizova who has passed as a witness in the case of journalist
Rauf Mirkadirov and has undergone pressure from the investigation,
hasn’t committed any crime, according to Azerbaijani news agency
Turan, today in the press conference the head of the Institute for
Peace and Democracy Leyla Yunus said. According to her there was no
court decision prohibiting Azizova to leave the country.

Yunus noted that during her stay in Azerbaijan, Matanat Azizova was
interrogated for 8-10 hours, she was forced to sign some documents,
was pressured, and for this reason she left the country.

“Matanat Azizova did not flee the country or hide from the
investigation. She will not testify because she hasn’t committed any
crime and therefore itself an investigation is unreasonable,”
continued Yunus.

It was Yunus who as a member of the international human rights
organization “Front-Line”, adopted decision that Azizova should leave
Azerbaijan, Yunus said.

Leyla Yunus called a flagrant violation of the law the fact that one
of these days Azizova’s husband and wife was not given a permission to
leave Azerbaijan. “There is not any decision against these people,
their names are not on a specific crime, for whatever reason they
cannot leave the country? It was committed by the Investigation
Department of the Attorney General for Serious Crimes, which does not
have such powers,” said Yunus.

According to her in this way the prosecutor’s office wants to return
Azizova to Azerbaijan, that’s why her husband and son are made as
hostages. “Their hopes are in vain if they think that it will help
them to return Azizova to the country,” Yunus said noting that on May
23 she announced a campaign to protect the rights of Azizova’s family
members.

Samira Agayeva, a representative of Azizova, on her turn said that she
spoke with the investigators who banned Azizova’s husband and son to
leave the country. However, the investigators said they have no
authority to give such instructions. Samir Agayeva is going to sue
border services, the article reads.

The mother of the head of Women Crisis Center Matanat Aziziova human
rights activist Mirvari Gahramanli expressed concern about threats to
the life of her daughter, son-in-law and grandson. She said that the
responsibility for any hard-hitting against her family members will be
assigned to the official Baku. Gahramanli also said that her documents
to her house, the cottage, as well as her grandson’s computer, has not
been returned back yet, although she does not have any relation to the
lawsuit. She said that law enforcement bodies are thieves.

As Azerbaijani news agency APA reports, Gahramanli also said, “I told
my daughter not to return to Azerbaijan earlier than after 3 months,
even if I die.” To the question in what country her daughter currently
lives she answered that “I speak with Matanat quite frequently.
Currently she is getting medical treatment in another country. I don’t
want to tell where exactly she is as I’m afraid that she will be
kidnapped.”

Besides, according to Turan, Leyla Yunus said that the case against
Mirkadirov is totally false. She noted that the “criminal”
investigation team was formed to investigate the case. Yunus drew
attention to the fact that the same group of the Investigative
Department for Serious Crimes Prosecutor General’s Office led
“political case” against the leader REAL Ilgar Mammadov, activists of
NIDA, head of the Elections Monitoring and Democracy Studies Center
(EMDSC) Anar Mammedli.

Later Leyla Yunus gave several recommendations to the reporters that
are summoned in the case of Rauf Mirkadirov. Particularly, she
recommended not to sign a non-disclosure document and immediately
publish the information they gave to the investigation.

Note that Azizova is the head of Women’s Crisis Center which is a
partner organization to the Institute for Peace and Democracy led by
Leyla Yunus. Earlier this month Azerbaijani prosecutors raided
Azizova’s apartment. Azizova is currently out of the country. On May
22 on the Azerbaijani-Georgian border when leaving for Georgia
Azizova’s husband and son were detained.

Note that in the evening of April 28 in the airport of Baku while
departing to Doha famous Azerbaijani human rights activist Leyla Yunus
and her husband conflictologist Arif Yunus were detained. They
intended to fly to Paris, then to Brussels by the invitation of EU to
participate in an international event. Leyla Yunus was taken to the
Department of Grave Crimes of Azerbaijani Prosecutor General’s office
for questioning, where she spent 9 hours. Her husband who was detained
with her was hospitalized in pre-infarction condition. Search of
Yunus’ apartment and IPD office was conducted.

Note that Human Rights Commissioner of the Council of Europe, Nils
Muiznieks, U.S. State Department, the U.S. Embassy in Azerbaijan and
human rights organizations, such as the Norwegian Helsinki Committee,
Human Rights Watch, Freedom House and the International Federation of
Human Rights Organizations (FIDH) have condemned the detention of
human rights activist Leyla Yunus in Baku.

Earlier in Baku the journalist of Azerbaijani newspaper Zerkalo Rauf
Mirkadirov was arrested. He was accused of conducting espionage for
Armenia.

Source: Panorama.am

Russia’s new migration law applies to 220,000 Armenians, says demogr

Russia’s new migration law applies to 220,000 Armenians, says demographer

19:05 * 24.05.14

Russia’s new migration rules cannot be said to be essentially
different from the previous ones, an Armenian ethnographer has said,
commenting on the most recent amendments to the Russian Law on
Migration.

“The first essential difference is that while the previous law obliged
a migrant to leave the country after the expiry of the 90-day [period
of stay], with a subsequent right to entry for a limited period, it
has been restricted now,” Ruben Yeganyan told a news conference on
Saturday.

In the meantime, he noted that whenever a migrant has a legal
employment contract, the new legislation allows him or her to stay in
the country until the expiry of the term of that contract.

He further warned against any violations. “If you have violated the
Russian migration legislation, they may block your entry to the
country for three years. An automated system today helps identify the
person who committed a violation, restricting the corruption risk upon
crossing the border,” he explained.

Yeganyan added that anyone who ever committed a violation is denied
entry into Russia once that violation is disclosed at the border
checkpoint. “The Armenian citizens, to whom this applies, are some
220,000 people; they are employment migrants whose means of
subsistence are generated at the expense of foreign migration. Some of
them are now in Armenia and cannot leave,” the demographer said,
adding that possible solutions may be found after Armenia becomes a
member state of the Eurasian Customs Union.

Armenian News – Tert.am

Masonic gathering planned in Armenia

Zhamanak: Masonic gathering planned in Armenia

10:41 24/05/2014 >> DAILY PRESS

A big gathering of masons will take place in Armenia this year as
well, Zhamanak writes. According to the newspaper’s information, the
meeting is scheduled for July. Master of Grand Orient de France
Masonic Lodge Gi Arsize has been invited to it.

Source: Panorama.am

Les agents secrets Arméniens de l’URSS honorés par la Poste arménien

PHILATELIE ARMENIENNE
Les agents secrets Arméniens de l’URSS honorés par la Poste arménienne

Le 20 mai la Poste arménienne Haypost a procédé à l’émission d’un
timbre-bloc et d’une série de quatre timbres sur le thème >.

Le timbre-bloc, d’une valeur de 350 drams représente le portrait de
l’agent secret arméno-soviétique Kévork Vartanian qui fut gratifié du
titre de > en URSS. Ce timbre d’un tirage de 20 000
exemplaires est édité par Cartor (France).

La série de quatre timbres de 230 drams chacun, dédiés aux agents
secrets Arméniens représentent Hagop Davdyan (1888-1938), Ivan
Aghayantz (1911-1988), Haïg Hovaguimian (1898-1967) et Ashot Hagopian
(1915-1981). Chaque timbre est édité en 40 000 exemplaires. L’édition
fut réalisée également par Cartor (France).

Krikor Amirzayan

samedi 24 mai 2014,
Krikor Amirzayan (c)armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=100063

Emission par Haypost, la Poste arménienne de la 8ème série des timbr

PHILATELIE ARMENIENNE
Emission par Haypost, la Poste arménienne de la 8ème série des timbres
consacrés à l’alphabet arménien

Haypost, la Poste arménienne a procédé le 22 avril 2014 à la 8ème
édition de la série consacrée aux lettres de l’alphabet arménien.
Chaque lettre est représentée par un timbre-poste. Cette dernière
émission porte sur 6 lettres avec des tirages variant de 300 000 à 1
500 000. Le designer de cette série est Mariam Ganayan. Ces timbres
furet édités à l’imprimerie Lowe Martin Groupe au Canada.

Krikor Amirzayan

samedi 24 mai 2014,
Krikor Amirzayan (c)armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=100062

Le volume des échanges entre l’Albanie et l’Arménie reste encore fai

ARMENIE-ALBANIE
Le volume des échanges entre l’Albanie et l’Arménie reste encore
faible selon un diplomate arménien

Dans une interview accordée au magazine albanais >, un
diplomate arménien de l’Ambassade d’Arménie en Albanie, Minas
Mardikian affirme que malgré les relations diplomatiques établies le
18 février 1993 entre Yerevan et Tirana, le volume des échanges et de
coopération reste très faible. Actuellement Gaguik Ghaltchian est
Ambassadeur d’Arménie en Albanie. Il occupe cette fonction depuis le
20 juin 2010. La communauté arménienne d’Albanie compte plusieurs
centaines de membres. C’est à la fin du 19e siècle que le premier
Arménien a été signalé en Albanie, du nom de Hovhannes Bey Tabibian
qui était le responsable de l’hôpital de la ville de Shkoder entre
1875 et1885. Après la Première guerre mondiale, suite au génocide, des
dizaines d’Arméniens se réfugièrent en Albanie. Puis dans les années
1930 une seconde vague fit venir plusieurs Arméniens depuis l’Europe
occidentale ou de la Grèce vers l’Albanie.

Krikor Amirzayan

samedi 24 mai 2014,
Krikor Amirzayan (c)armenews.com