Volodya Avetisyan Case: Friends Of Jailed War Vet Claim His Family U

VOLODYA AVETISYAN CASE: FRIENDS OF JAILED WAR VET CLAIM HIS FAMILY UNDER PRESSURE

HUMAN RIGHTS | 17.03.15 | 11:49

By SARA KHOJOYAN
ArmeniaNow reporter

Karabakh water veteran, retired Colonel Volodya Avetisyan, who was
sentenced to 6.5 years imprisonment for fraud last year, needs help,
his friends say. That’s why members of a committee in defense of
Volodya Avetisyan have organized a fundraising campaign to collect
$2,000.

That amount Avetisyan’s family is supposed to pay to the state budget
under the sentence, according to which the colonel of the reserve
army took $2,000 from a citizen with a promise to support the latter’s
grandson to be released from military service and committed fraud.

The committee head, Gagik Sarukhanyan, said that pressure against
Avetisyan’s large family still continues after 18 months since
Volodya’s imprisonment, the family faces losing the only source of
income of their family – a piece of land, despite health problems his
son was drafted to the army, Avetisyan’s wife and mother are sick,
two teenage sons can barely earn the family’s living.

“We received information that those individuals who have been the
servants of this regime, are waiting for the Service for the Mandatory
Execution of Judicial Acts (SMEJA) of Armenia to take the land on sale,
and although they do not need it, they are going to buy it and not
even use it, just to put more pressure on Volodya,” Sarukhanyan told
reporters on Monday, refusing to identify the mentioned individuals.

The retired colonel believes that Avetisyan’s son with health problems
was conscripted solely to cause pressure on Avetisyan.

“It was possible to legally release him from the military service,
but he wasn’t, Volodya’s two other sons served in the army (Avetisyan
has six sons), but this son was not supposed to be sent to military
service. He has a stomach ulcer, heart problems, the boy was
hospitalized four times before already.”

However, even in prison Avetisyan does not give up and does not give
way to pressures.

“He has a combative predisposition, he is free, only inside the
prison walls, because freedom for him is first the freedom of mind and
spirit,” Sarukhanyan added reminding that from Vardashen penitentiary
Avetisyan urged everyone to stand up, get rid of the regime and to
liberate the country.

Investigation against Avetisyan started still in 2013 shortly after he
started protests demanding better conditions for Karabakh war veterans.

All three judicial instances confirmed the verdict of the
pre-investigation body, according to which the colonel of the reserve
army committed fraud twice, once, taking $2,000 from a citizen with
a promise to assist in releasing the latter’s grandson from military
service, in the other – removing a military serviceman from one
military base to another for $500.

However, Avetisyan’s family, friends and lawyer Ara Zakaryan claim
that he is persecuted and is jailed because of organizing protests
against the government. With sufficient financial means they are
going to turn to the European Court of Human Rights.

Authorities had all along denied that Avetisyan’s imprisonment and
trial were politically motivated.

http://armenianow.com/society/human_rights/61486/armenia_retired_colonel_volodya_avetisyan_case_campaign

Zhamanak: Khachatur Sukiasyan Declares War Upon Coca-Cola

ZHAMANAK: KHACHATUR SUKIASYAN DECLARES WAR UPON COCA-COLA

11:12 17/03/2015 ” DAILY PRESS

Coca-Cola is not served in public food facilities belonging to
businessman Khachatur Sukiasyan for a long time now, Zhamanak reports.

Citing sources, the newspaper explains that Sukiasyan and Coca-Cola
failed to combine joint business interests. The Sukiasyan family
obliged Coca-Cola to insure its vehicles in the SIL Insurance Company.

Coca-Cola, however, refused and as a result, Sukiasyan prohibited
serving this drink at his public food facilities.

http://www.panorama.am/en/society/2015/03/17/jamanak1/

Reform Controversy: ANC Reaffirms Opposition To Constitutional Amend

REFORM CONTROVERSY: ANC REAFFIRMS OPPOSITION TO CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS

NEWS | 17.03.15 | 10:49

The Armenian National Congress (ANC) will seek to scuttle the
constitutional reform initiated by the current administration or turn
a corresponding referendum into a “vote of no confidence” in President
Serzh Sargsyan and his government, the opposition party said on Monday.

In a statement the ANC said that the initiative has only one goal:
“To remove the constitutional barrier to extending [Sargsyan’s]
personal rule.”

The opposition party claimed that Sargsyan ordered a government
crackdown against the opposition last month “in order to reach
this goal”.

Last week the president held a series of meetings with representatives
of several political parties, including the Prosperous Armenia Party
(PAP), which had to change its leader earlier this month under apparent
strong pressure from Sargsyan and his ruling Republican Party of
Armenia, that described the PAP’s then leader Gagik Tsarukyan as
“evil”.

Since the change of leadership on March 5, the PAP has been less
categorical in its opposition to the constitutional reform that is
expected to turn Armenia into a parliamentary republic.

The ANC believes, however, that by making the National Assembly a
more dominant branch of power Sargsyan attempts to extend his own
rule beyond 2018 when, under the current Constitution, he will be
barred from seeking a third presidential term in a row.

Sargsyan, who formally endorsed the reform concept over the weekend,
earlier had pledged not to seek a top government post if the
constitutional amendments were made.

“The goal of this imitational show of “broad consolidation” of
political forces is to create an illusion of public approval around
the idea of changing the Constitution,” the ANC said.

“The ANC state that in the created situation it will do everything
to protect the Constitution from tyrannical encroachments, to return
the power to the people, to restore the disturbed constitutional order
and urges the public, all layers of society to consolidate and oppose
the unconcealed attempt to establish dictatorship in the country by
turning the referendum on constitutional amendments into a vote of
no confidence in Serzh Sargsyan and a nationwide process of removing
the current regime from power,” the opposition party said.

http://armenianow.com/news/61477/armenia_constitutional_reform_anc_opposition

Armenia-Georgia Power Link Project Lent EURO 95m

ARMENIA-GEORGIA POWER LINK PROJECT LENT EURO 95M

Energy Live News – Energy Made Easy
March 16 2015

Mar 16, 2015 Priyanka Shrestha

The power line linking Armenia and Georgia is getting a boost, thanks
to a EURO 95.2 million (£68m) loan announced today.

The European Investment Bank (EIB) said it is providing EURO 10
million (£7.2m) while German bank KfW is lending EURO 85.2 million
(£61m) for the project.

The cash will be used to build the new electricity transmission line
and a high-voltage direct current station between the two nations,
designed to meet the growing power demand.

EIB Vice-President Wilhelm Molterer, responsible for EIB lending in
Armenia said: “The project will also foster regional trade, increase
the potential for the use of hydro energy generation and facilitate
FDI [foreign direct investment] by ensuring the reliable electricity
deliveries needed by foreign investors.”

Earlier this month UK energy regulator Ofgem launched a consultation
on its proposals to approve three new electricity interconnectors.

http://www.energylivenews.com/2015/03/16/armenia-georgia-power-link-project-lent-e95m/

Syria And The Battered Minorities Of The Middle East

SYRIA AND THE BATTERED MINORITIES OF THE MIDDLE EAST

Al-Jazeera, Qatar
March 15 2015

Attacks, murders, abductions and the humiliation of minorities in
the Middle East have now reached frightening levels.

by Harry Hagopian

Our neighbourhood in East Jerusalem housed Christian as well as Muslim
families. To our right lived Armenians and Arab Christians, and to
our left were three Muslim neighbours. And although my mum and dad
were evidently sensitive to their backgrounds – Armenian, Palestinian
Christian or Palestinian Muslim – what truly mattered to them in the
end was the person rather than the religion, confession or ethnicity.

Those early memories remain precious, so much so that I still find it
hard to fast forward my life by some four decades and fathom fully that
we are living in a world where so much distrust – and such raw fear –
has been sown into the hearts of many peoples in the MENA region. It
is perhaps less so in Palestine where Muslims and Christians are
together struggling against an occupation that has disempowered them
all irrespective of their religious affiliation as it appears on
their differently-coloured identity cards.

ISIL fighters raid Christian villages in Syria

Over a number of years, something has become broken and I have not
yet succeeded in identifying it fully. Mind you, this began taking
root well before ISIL emerged on the scene, but if I look at the fate
of minorities in places like Iraq and Syria, to mention only two key
countries, it becomes abundantly clear to me that the feral attacks,
murders, abductions and humiliation against Christians and other
minorities by groups that claim to be speaking in the name of Islam
has now reached frightening zeniths.

Outer religious identity

What seems to matter these days is not so much the inner person as an
aggregate of different qualities. Instead, it is the outer religious
identity. I have heard – and we have all seen – horrific incidents
in Mosul, Deir el-Zor and other parts of Iraq and Syria, about
the maltreatment of Christians and this tempts me to cross-examine
the vehement degree of change in those societies over the past two
decades. I am frankly afraid as I had never felt so much unrefined
distrust let alone fear and hatred as I do today when travelling in
the region or speaking with different communities.

Why is it that there is a rampage against the minority communities of
Iraq since the downfall of Saddam Hussein whereby one million Iraqi
Christians have witnessed their numbers dwindle to less than 350,000?

Or why are other communities such as Shabaks, Sabaeans or even Yazidis
facing extinction?

How can I even resolutely castigate those Arab Christian hierarchs
who pretend … that the salvation of their communities can solely
be secured by those bloodied dictators and power-hungry despots who
have been in part responsible for the wholesale oppression, repression
and indoctrination of their own ‘citizens’?

How can anyone who believes in a higher Almighty commit the
barbarities of ISIL or destroy artefacts and monuments (in Nimrud,
Harta or Khorasabad) that are a token of our ancient history and
earlier civilisations? How can I justify the heinous crimes of
those individuals who give themselves a God-inspired right to kill
individuals of other faiths with such impunity?

How can I even resolutely castigate those Arab Christian hierarchs
who pretend – wrongly in my opinion – that the salvation of their
communities can solely be secured by those bloodied dictators and
power-hungry despots who have been in part responsible for the
wholesale oppression, repression and indoctrination of their own
“citizens”?

Radicalised minority

I suppose I could harvest some answers – justifications even – for
the state of our world today. After all, I could argue that Islam is
roughly 700 years younger than Christianity and that Muslims would
learn from the error of their ways just as Christians did after the
barbarous excesses of the Crusades or the Inquisition. Why stop with
those events, though, and not dredge up the colonial period that rode
roughshod over the local Arabs across a whole region?

Or I could even segue that what is occurring today is not the real
teaching of Islam or the work of the huge majority of Muslims but
that of a tiny radicalised minority across the faith who are reacting
against western hegemony and global emasculation. Better still, I
could posit my own theory that parts of the Muslim ummah have become so
traumatised by their ostracism from society that they have regressed
into a frame of mind which finds safety in a religious entitlement
to establish a caliphate where everybody who does not belong to their
rigorously exclusive interpretation becomes a second-class subject.

Alas, something has indeed broken no matter the learned pundits or
rabble rousers who claim otherwise. I would also argue it is our
responsibility as Muslims and Christians to tackle the causes of this
downward spiral together to enable us to address their symptoms too.

The crux of the matter is that we should speak out against such
atrocities, and the imams and religious leaders within the Muslim faith
should lead the way in raising our collective and unqualified voices.

This year marks the fourth anniversary of the uprisings across the MENA
region. This includes the Syrian uprisings that started off peacefully
in Daraa in mid-March 2011 by Syrians seeking their dignity and
bread. So faced with the pain of Raqqa and Aleppo, let alone of Mosul,
Sirte, Derna or Falluja, let me return to the beginnings of Islam.

Protected rights

Picture released in the 1930s showing the place where Saint-Paul fled
in Damascus [Getty]

Was it not in 628 CE that a Christian delegation from St Catherine’s
monastery in Egypt met with the Prophet Mohammad and requested
his protection? Did he not then give them a charter that protected
the right to property, freedom of religion and employment as well
as security for the person? Do the first and last sentences of the
charter not promise that it was eternal and universal so nobody could
revoke the inalienable privileges it granted to those Christians?

Was it not also in 631 CE that the Prophet Muhammad received a
delegation of 60 Christians from Najran in his mosque in Medina
where he allowed them to pray and then concluded the “covenant to
the Christians of Najran” as a treaty granting them religious and
administrative autonomy as citizens of the Islamic State?

Today, 14 centuries later, I understand the fear of others but I do
not internalise it. Rather, I pause to raise relevant questions about
issues of disempowerment, marginalisation, repression or destitution
of large masses across the MENA region that aided and abetted the
process of such radicalism. After all, we should not overlook the
demographic and polarising impact of top-bottom corruption, cronyism,
nepotism and abuse that festers in many MENA societies today.

So could it be that those factors contributed in fomenting anger and
hatred to such a high degree that they also percolated extremism and
even terrorism in our midst? Equally importantly, and once this wave
of radicalised extremism has – ineluctably – receded, will it spawn
new forms of radicalism? If so, will we succeed in reclaiming our
universal God? Or will those battered communities with their wounded
beliefs now become the disfigured realities of a new MENA region?

Dr Harry Hagopian is a London-based international lawyer, political
adviser and ecumenical consultant on the MENA region. He is also a
second-track negotiator and works closely with European institutions.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not
necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial policy.

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2015/03/syria-battered-minorities-middle-east-150315061239648.html

Armenia’s Opposition Needs New Rules Of Game, Says Political Enginee

ARMENIA’S OPPOSITION NEEDS NEW RULES OF GAME, SAYS POLITICAL ENGINEER

17:45 * 16.03.15

No party representing the political minority in Armenia appears today
powerful enough to promote major changes, says a political engineer.

Speaking to Tert.am, Karen Kocharyan said he thinks that the opposition
parties alone are to blame for their recent failure to unite into
a stronger alliance. “The opposition will never collapse unless it
wishes to. I simply think that this is the kind of opposition we have;
they themselves wanted the collapse,” he said, when asked to comment
on a possible influence by the ruling authorities.

Kocharyan added in the meantime that he doesn’t expect vacuum on the
political arena to be long-lasting. “The holy place never remains
vacant,” he noted.

Kocharyan said he expects the new campaign among the opposition forces
to address more geopolitical rather than domestic political issues.

According to him, the parties with pro-Russian orientation (Prosperous
Armenia and Armenian National Congress) are likely to confront those
pursuing Western policies (Heritage, Free Democrats etc).

In the meantime, the expert stressed the need of cleaning up the
political arena from all the acting players, particularly those
representing the governing political force. “It is necessary to
demonstrate a political will, cross everything out and write new
games rules not to be ever violated by anyone. That’s what they [the
ruling authorities] should rely on if they want to move forward and
help the country out,” he added.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2015/03/16/karen-qocharyan/1618854

El Gobierno Turco Critica A La UE Por Considerar "Genocidio" La Mata

EL GOBIERNO TURCO CRITICA A LA UE POR CONSIDERAR “GENOCIDIO” LA MATANZA DE ARMENIOS

ABC.es, España
16 marzo 2015

madrid
Día 16/03/2015 – 15.09h

Según el ministro de Exteriores turco, estas afirmaciones “dañan las
relaciones entre Turquía y la UE y hacen difícil que los turcos y
los armenios construyan su futuro juntos”

Una imagen historica de los niños armenios desplazados

El ministro de Exteriores turco, Tanju Bilgic, ha criticado duramente
un informe sobre Derechos Humanos adoptado por el Parlamento Europeo,
alegando que carece de realidad historica y de base jurídica, ya que
acusa a Turquía de haber cometido un genocidio en Armenia hace un
siglo, según ha informado el periodico turco “Hurriyet”.

“Encontramos las afirmaciones extraordinariamente problematicas en
todos los aspectos y nos sentimos apenados por ellas”, ha señalado
Bilgic. El ministro turco ha calificado el informe europeo de “ilogico
e inmoral”.

“Estos pasos, que estan siendo dados por aquellos que desconocen este
suceso historico, dañan las relaciones entre Turquía y la UE y hacen
difícil que los turcos y los armenios construyan su futuro juntos”,
ha afirmado Bilgic.

“Esperamos que nuestros socios europeos no remuevan mas el problema,
sino que busquen contribuciones constructivas para una solucion y que
animen a los armenios a sumarse al dialogo y a la reconciliacion”,
ha asegurado.

El pasado jueves, el Parlamento Europeo presento un documento titulado
Informe Anual sobre Derechos Humanos y Democracia en el Mundo, en el
que recogía que en 2015 es “el centenario del genocidio armenio”. En el
informe tambien “se anima a los Estados miembros y a las instituciones
comunitarias a contribuir para que se reconozca” como genocidio.

En 1915, el Gobierno del Imperio Otomano ejercio una serie de
deportaciones forzosas y exterminios contra la poblacion armenia, de
religion cristiana ortodoxa, en el contexto de la I Guerra Mundial. Se
calcula que murieron en torno a 1,5 millones de armenios durante
la masacre.

Aunque la sucesora del Imperio Otomano, Turquía, no niega las
deportaciones ni la matanza, sí afirma que un genocidio debe tener
la intencion de exterminar a una etnia, algo que según Estambul no
se cometio en aquellos actos de 1915.

http://www.abc.es/internacional/20150316/abci-turquia-critica-genocidio-armenio-201503161148.html

Paruyr Hayrikyan: All Three Presidents Are KGB Henchmen

PARUYR HAYRIKYAN: ALL THREE PRESIDENTS ARE KGB HENCHMEN

19:44 | March 16,2015 | Politics

Members of the Union for National Self-Determination (AIM) led by
Paruyr Hayrikyan today gathered in Yerevan’s Liberty Square to express
their resentment against the Russian-Turkish agreement signed on March
16, 1921. The primary goal of the document is ‘to make Armenia part
of Turkey.’

“The document was signed without the third country -Armenia which is
in violation of the law,” said Paruyr Hayrikyan.

He says the consequences of the Genocide would not have been so grave
if the treaty was not signed. After the Genocide, there were over
2 million Armenians living in different countries and if they lived
under one roof, there would be at least 30 million Armenians today.

“Under the Russian-Turkish agreement, eastern Armenia was given to
Turkey and Nachijevan to Azerbaijan,” said the AIM leaders.

Paruyr Hayrikyan states that all the three presidents of Armenia have
been the henchmen of the KGB.

If the other presidents keep silent, Levon Ter-Petrosyan openly
said that he was one of the wise men who, when ordered to annul
the agreement, said it was a mistake. It means that Ter-Petrosyan
considered the cancellation of an agreement that degraded our country
as a mistake,” Mr Hayrikyan said adding that ‘only idiots can say that
Russia is a good partner for Armenia no matter what it does to us.’

The AIM leader says it would be right to send the messages to the
president but that person [Serzh Sargsyan] has proved with his actions
that he appeared in power by mistake.

At the end of the meeting, the participants left a message for the
Ministry of Foreign Ministers and marched to the Tsitsernakaberd
Memorial Complex.

They were going to send a similar message to the Russian Embassy in
Yerevan expressing hope that the Russian political thought will send
the notorious agreement to the dustbin.

http://en.a1plus.am/1207884.html

Armenia And EBRD Sign 20 Million Euro Grant Agreement

ARMENIA AND EBRD SIGN 20 MILLION EURO GRANT AGREEMENT

YEREVAN, March 16. / ARKA /. Armenian ministry of energy and natural
resources and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
(EBRD) have signed on Monday an investment agreement, enabling Armenia
to attract a nearly 20 million euro grant.

The money will be provided under the Eastern Europe Energy Efficiency
and Environment Partnership, program (E5P).

“This agreement will help to attract additional resources for
implementtaion of energy efficiency projects in the communities of
Armenia. Armenia attaches importance to the signing of this document,’
said energy and natural resources minister Yervand Zakaryan at a
briefing after the signing of the document.

According to him, in the first stage Armenia will invest 1 million euro
of its own funds and receive approximately a 20 million euro grant.

He said Armenia will have to invest the first 100 thousand euros in
the near future and the rest within for four years.

E5P Fund manager Andres Lund stressed that the agreement is an
important step for the development of energy cooperation between the
EU and Armenia. According to him, the funds will be used to finance
renewable energy projects, introduction of heating systems and systems
for management of wastewater and solid waste in the communities.

Armenia, Georgia and Moldova joined the E5P in October 2013. E5P donors
are EU countries, also, Iceland, Norway, Ukraine, the United States,
as well as Armenia, Georgia and Moldova. -0-

http://arka.am/en/news/economy/armenia_and_ebrd_sign_20_million_euro_grant_agreement/#sthash.JRyzOUi7.dpuf

Concern In Baku Over Russia-Georgia-Armenia Military Transit

CONCERN IN BAKU OVER RUSSIA-GEORGIA-ARMENIA MILITARY TRANSIT

EurasiaNet.org
March 16 2015

March 15, 2015 – 7:01pm, by Joshua Kucera

Recent reports that Russian military vehicles were appearing in Georgia
have raised complaints in neighboring Azerbaijan that Tbilisi is
“betraying” Baku by allowing the Russian military to ship military
supplies into Armenia via its territory or airspace.

The story of the Russian vehicles in Georgia is almost certainly a
tempest in a teapot – after footage surfaced of Russian-made ZIL 131
military trucks on Georgian streets, various theories quickly emerged.

Georgia’s opposition claimed the trucks were evidence that the current
government was in cahoots with Moscow, while some suggested they may
be on the way to Armenia, where Russia both has its own large military
base and provides substantial military aid to the armed forces there.

But it didn’t take long for another, more banal explanation to come
out: the vehicles were decommissioned in Russia and are being sold
on the commercial market.

There’s no indication that the Russian trucks were in fact destined
for Armenia, but the question of how Russia supplies its base in
Armenia, as well as delivers military aid there, has long been a
secretive and contentious one. Armenia is separated from Russia by
Azerbaijan and Turkey, which are hostile to Armenia, and Georgia,
which is hostile to Russia. Georgia nevertheless did allow overflights
of Russian military shipments to Armenia until 2011, when it publicly
annulled the agreement with Russia allowing for that transit. The
status of that transit is now unclear, though there have been various
unconfirmed reports that it was reinstated even while former president
Mikheil Saakashvili was in power.

Azerbaijani analyst Mubariz Ahmedoglu, in a Baku press conference
March 5, accused Georgia of “betraying” Azerbaijan by allowing the
transit. “Chronic problems in the Azerbaijan-Georgia relationship have
shown themselves cumulatively. Georgia never expresses real support for
Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity. The only support is rhetorical,”
Ahmedoglu said. He argued further that Georgia’s government is going
along with a Russian plan to annex Armenia via the Georgian occupied
territories.

“Georgian officials can resort to sophistry to claim that the transit
of military hardware via Georgia to Armenia does not pose a threat for
Azerbaijan and Georgia. However, the incumbent Georgian leadership
created the biggest threat for itself. This is both a military and
geopolitical threat,” Ahmedoglu said.

It’s not clear to what extent Ahmedoglu’s views represent those in the
government, but the fact that in Azerbaijan’s increasingly repressive
environment he held a press conference covered by pro-government
media suggests it has official sanction.

http://www.eurasianet.org/node/72531