Elda Green Should Be Held Responsible

Elda Green Should Be Held Responsible

Law – Monday, 29 October 2012, 16:11

Dwelling on judicial breaches relating to the case of the serviceman
Artak Nazaryan’s murder, the representative of the victim’s successor
Attorney Ruben Martirosyan says the court hearing has been going on
for a year and a half, and despite a number of crimes committed by the
investigation the victim’s lawyers point out, they continue to cover
up the case.

According to him, a systemic crime has been committed which, if
revealed, will necessitate prosecution of 20-30 legal officials. He
says the military prosecutor, the prosecutor general and the minister
of defense are aware of the case and they have committed the crime
together.

According to the lawyer, a bullet was found which was later eliminated
and another bullet was planted somewhere else. According to the
lawyer, the investigation proved that Artak Nazaryan, before going to
the post, had 122 bullets but after the incident only 120 were found,
which means he could not commit a suicide. He also noted that the
investigation started later than the six hours of the case. According
to the medical doctor, Artak Nazaryan had been beaten up and tortured
immediately before the incident. Ruben Martirosyan says the judge has
these facts but ignores them.

In answer to the question who needs the cover-up of the case, Ruben
Martirosyan said that well-known people are involved directly.
According to the other lawyer Mushegh Shushanyan, listing non-combat
cases as suicides is not just a tendency but a policy.

According to him, the medical psychologist Elda Green, who concluded
that Artak Nazaryan had committed suicide should be held responsible
too because she participated in drawing such conclusions for all army
cases.

http://www.lragir.am/index.php/eng/0/right/view/27883

CPJ Executive Director Responds to Criticism over Turkey Report

CPJ Executive Director Responds to Criticism over Turkey Report

November 4, 2012

By Joel Simon

Last week’s release of the Committee to Protect Journalists’ (CPJ)
report on Turkey’s press freedom crisis generated widespread domestic
media coverage and sparked a robust public debate. The response from
Turkish journalists and commentators was largely positive, but there
were some negative reactions as well. Turkey’s Justice Ministry has
promised a detailed response this week. Here is a summary of the
criticism we received during several days of intensive media
interviews, along with our responses.

Over a four-month period, our researchers reviewed lists of detainees
compiled by the Turkish Justice Ministry and local and international
groups, examined indictments, consulted underlying legal documents,
interviewed defense lawyers, spoke with journalists covering the
cases, and evaluated the published, first-hand accounts of the
defendants themselves.
CPJ has a political agenda in Turkey. Not true. CPJ has worked for 31
years to defend the rights of journalists around the world. We are
non-partisan, non-ideological, and independent. We do not accept any
government funding. As journalists ourselves, our sole interest is
ensuring that our media colleagues in Turkey are able to work freely,
without intimidation or the threat of jail. As background, the last
time our organization was this active in Turkey was in the 1990’s when
authorities jailed as many as 78 journalists as part of a widespread
crackdown. Many of those jailed at the time were journalists who wrote
from a religious perspective and were persecuted for their views. When
we included them on our list of imprisoned journalists, we were
harshly criticized by the Turkish government’under different
leadership at the time ‘and by much of the media establishment. We
stood our ground and fought for the release of every single imprisoned
journalist. Today we are guided by the same principles. No journalist
should be imprisoned for his or her work.

You were duped by your Turkish researchers. False. The report was an
organization-wide project and was written by experienced senior staff,
under the coordination of our editorial director, Bill Sweeney, and
our Europe and Central Asia program coordinator, Nina Ognianova. Our
team of highly capable Turkish researchers, led by Ã-zgür Ã-Ä?ret, was
responsible for researching the cases of jailed journalists, which is
an appendix to the main report. The case research was rigorous. Over a
four-month period, our researchers reviewed lists of detainees
compiled by the Turkish Justice Ministry and local and international
groups, examined indictments, consulted underlying legal documents,
interviewed defense lawyers, spoke with journalists covering the
cases, and evaluated the published, first-hand accounts of the
defendants themselves. Ã-Ä?ret traveled to New York to work alongside
our editorial director throughout the editing process. Our research
team provided the data, but CPJ staff made the determination on how to
classify each imprisoned case. In compiling the main report, CPJ staff
traveled to Turkey on three fact-finding missions in 2011 and 2012,
meeting with dozens of journalists, analysts, and lawyers. The report
was an institutional effort, and as executive director I take full
responsibility for its contents.

No one can trust your data because your last report cited just eight
Turkish journalists in jail. In December 2011, CPJ published its
prison census, which we have been compiling and publishing annually
since 1985. This was not a special report on Turkey, but rather a
global survey of every country in the world. In an open letter to
Prime Minister ErdoÄ?an on Dec. 22, 2011, CPJ wrote that we believed
there were many other journalists in prison in Turkey, in addition to
the cases confirmed in the census. We committed to carrying out a
systematic review of those cases to determine whether they were in
fact jailed for their professional work as journalists. We have now
completed that review and have confirmed that a total of 61
journalists are in jail in Turkey for their work. We also researched
an additional 15 cases, but did not classify them as confirmed either
because there was insufficient information to determine whether they
were jailed for their journalism, or because they may have been jailed
in retaliation for their political activism. CPJ’s next global prison
census will be published in December.

It’s absurd for CPJ to suggest that Turkey is more repressive than
Iran or Eritrea. It is absurd, and we would never suggest it. What we
reported, based on diligent research, is the objective fact that
Turkey has more journalists in jail than either country. We recognize
that Turkey is an emerging democracy, economic success story, and
regional leader. The public debate about our report indicates just how
lively and vibrant the media in Turkey can be. However, the nation’s
inarguable position as the world’s leading jailer of journalists
invites inevitable comparisons to other countries that jail
journalists.

Turkey’s press freedom problems involve more than imprisonments. We
agree. Although the imprisonment of journalists is a focal point, our
report explores a broad range of threats to freedom of the press. We
examine the routine prosecution of journalists on criminal charges
related to newsgathering; the use of government pressure to instill
self-censorship in the media; and the failure to reform vaguely worded
penal and anti-terror statutes that are applied regularly against the
press.

The language you used in your report was unduly harsh and insulting.
We respectfully disagree. The report was critical but fair. It was
meticulously researched and fact-checked, and our conclusions and
analyses were supported by detailed evidence. We used direct but
measured language to communicate the reality that the Turkish media is
currently under extreme pressure and that dozens of journalists are
now in jail for their work.

CPJ is not the judge and jury. It’s up to the Turkish courts to
determine guilt and innocence. We agree. Our role is to review the
available evidence and to make informed public judgments about whether
the facts support the very serious charges leveled against the
journalists cited in our report. We hope that Turkish authorities will
carry out a similar exercise and decline to pursue cases in which
there is insufficient evidence to win convictions. While we believe
that none of the 61 cases have merit, we also are ready to examine any
new evidence that arises. If warranted, we are prepared to adjust our
conclusions. We are asking to meet with Turkish officials in Ankara
next month and we are hopeful that a productive exchange will take
place.

Joel Simon is the executive director of CPJ, a New York-based,
independent, non-profit organization that works to safeguard press
freedom worldwide.

http://www.armenianweekly.com/2012/11/04/cpj-executive-director-responds-to-criticism-on-turkey-report/

La production agricole d’Arménie en hausse de 10,2 pour cent

ARMENIE
La production agricole d’Arménie en hausse de 10,2 pour cent

La production agricole de l’Arménie au cours des sept premiers mois de
cette année est en hausse de 10,2 pour cent à 290,5 milliards de drams
a annoncé le ministre de l’agriculture Sergo Karapetyan.

Il a dit que les récoltes ont augmenté de plus de 20 pour cent tandis
que le secteur de l’élevage de bétail est en hausse de 2 %.

Le ministre a dit que bien que les rendements cette année soient
élevés les fermiers n’ont aucun problème dans la vente de leur
produit.

Selon le ministre, la part d’agriculture dans le PIB est en hausse.

« En 2010, la part de l’agriculture dans le PIB était environ 17 %. En
2011, grce à un jeu de facteurs, incluant l’exécution des programmes
du gouvernement, le chiffre est monté à 20,2 %. Les données
d’aujourd’hui en temps réel indiquent que cette tendance continuera
cette année » a dit le ministre, ajoutant que la hausse de
l’agriculture a un impact positif sur les exportations.

dimanche 4 novembre 2012,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

Ankara: Turks, Armenians And Ottomans

TURKS, ARMENIANS AND OTTOMANS
by MUSTAFA AKYOL

Hurriyet Daily News
nov 3 2012
Turkey

CALIFORNIA – I really was not expecting to eat the best lahmacun of my
life on the western coast of the United States. (Lahmacun, a sort of
thin pizza with minced meat, is prominent in Turkish cuisine.) However
Jack’s Bakery, a small family restaurant in the greater Los Angeles
area, went beyond all my expectations. Not only its lahmacun, but
everything I tasted here were both very delicious and very “Turkish.”

When I learned more about the story of 51-year-old Jack, whose
big moustache does not overshadow his big smile, I got it all. His
original name is Agop, and his family is from Kilis, an ancient town
in southeastern Turkey. They were one of the hundreds of thousands
of Armenian families who used to live in Anatolia until they were
tragically deported to Syria in 1915 – a painful episode in history
that I call, and condemn, as the ethnic cleansing of Ottoman Armenians.

However, while you can take the Armenians out of Anatolia, you
apparently can not take Anatolia out of them. Jack was a living proof.

He was speaking to me in perfect Turkish with a barely noticeable
accent and a beautifully native body language. “We always spoke
Turkish at home,” he told me, remembering his days in Kuwait, where
his family migrated to after some decades in Syria. “I perfected my
Armenian only in school.”

The curious story of Jack reminded me of how Turks and Armenians lived
side by side peacefully as neighbors for almost a thousand years,
before the dark side of modernity befell upon them. In these times,
Turks were considered superior, but thanks to Islamic law they also
recognized Armenians as “people of the book.” The Ottoman Empire
turned traditional Islamic pluralism into the “millet system,” in
which all “millets,” or nations, such as Muslims, Jews or Armenians,
had a certain degree of autonomy.

In fact the Armenians were so well integrated into the empire that the
Ottoman elite called them “the loyal nation.” Armenian architects were
the creators of some of the most beautiful mosques in Istanbul. Thanks
to the introduction of full equal citizenship in 1856, many Armenians
also joined Ottoman bureaucracy and even the Parliament.

However, this Ottoman pluralism would soon be challenged, and
ultimately destroyed, by a very un-Ottoman idea: nationalism. The
modern (and largely secular) belief that every nation should have
a sovereign state of its own led to rebellions, wars and ethnic
cleansings throughout the empire. Armenians got their terrible share
in 1915.

Since then, unfortunately, Turks and Armenians have been bitterly
opposed to each other. Turks have wrongly chosen to dismiss the
Armenians’ tragedy, whereas the latter decided to blame all Turks
for the acts of the Young Turk government of 1915.

“How can I hate you for what happened decades before you were born?”

Jack asked me, shattering many myths that we Turks have about
“the Armenian diaspora,” (we are told that all of them hate us). He
gave me hope that perhaps the gaps between our peoples are not that
unbridgeable.

Not at all, because things are changing, at least on the Turkish side.

No matter how belatedly and slowly, more Turks are realizing
that 1915 is not something to be proud of. And even more of them
are understanding that there is something gravely wrong with the
nationalist paradigm that has ruled Turkey for a century. In their
“neo-Ottomanism,” I believe, lies the key for Turko-Armenian
reconciliation.

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turks-armenians–and-ottomans.aspx?pageID=238&nID=33843&NewsCatID=411

Tests Results Of Armenian Nuclear Power Plant To Be Announced In May

TESTS RESULTS OF ARMENIAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT TO BE ANNOUNCED IN MAY 2013

Vestnik Kavkaza
Nov 2 2012
Russia

Ashot Martirosyan, head of the State Committee for Regulation of
Nuclear Security in Armenia, said that test results of the nuclear
power plant will be ready in May 2013, News.am reports.

First results will be presented to the state commission in
February-March 2013 and then passed to the IAEA and EU. A project
on nuclear security with account of the Fukushima problem will be
presented to the government next week.

The tests were started in 2011 and will be concluded in late 2012.

The European Union does not want modernization of the nuclear power
plant by 2016 and demands closing of the power plant in Armenia.

At Un On "Peaceful" Use Of Outer Space, Azerbaijan & Armenia Duel On

AT UN ON “PEACEFUL” USE OF OUTER SPACE, AZERBAIJAN & ARMENIA DUEL ON SEATS
By Matthew Russell Lee

Inner City Press
Nov 2 2012

UNITED NATIONS, November 2 –The “Peaceful” Uses of Outer Space gave
rise at the UN to a fight on Friday morning. Among three new members
proposed for the topic’s Committee was Armenia. Azerbaijan challenged
it, first in Vienna then in the General Assembly’s Fourth Committee.

The issue was Nagorno Karabakh, which also gave raise to several rights
of reply in the late night sessions of the General Debate in September.

But this was a new foray, seeking to block Armenia from a seat on
a relatively obscure UN committee. As one diplomat asked Inner City
Press rhetorically, is either one in outer space?

There are a lot of push back to and votes against Azerbaijan. Cyprus
on behalf of the European Union said this was an attempt to politicize
membership on the Committee.

The UN is, of course, a political place.

Algeria’s Permanent Representative said that his country was willing
to take action against “occupying powers” — which would also include
Israel — but on a forum like the Security Council, not on membership
on Committees.

After the final Committee vote, where Mongolia and Turkey joined
Azerbaijan in abstaining, Turkey said that more effort should have
been put into coming to consensus on procedure, so it had abstained.

They were called the last speaker on the item. But the issue is sure
to reappear. Watch this site.

Update: Azerbaijan’s representative was later recognized to explain
its vote after the vote, and congratulated the other new members
Jordan and Costa Rica.

Then he proceeded to say Armenia was behind the occupation of 20%
of Azerbaijan, and made eight percent of Azerbaijanis internally
displaced persons. He said Armenia is not a peaceful country, boding
badly for outer space.

Armenia’s Permanent Representative finished with a point of order,
calling it a fantasy to link a bilateral issue with outer space.

http://www.innercitypress.com/ga4spacenag110212.html

Armenia And Eu Pleased With Results Marked In 2012

ARMENIA AND EU PLEASED WITH RESULTS MARKED IN 2012

Mediamax
Nov 2 2012
Armenia

Yerevan/Mediamax/. Today, the Secretary of the Armenian National
Security Council, Artur Baghdasaryan, expressed satisfaction with the
results registered in the regular round of negotiations on Armenia-EU
Association Agreement held in Brussels on October 26.

This was stated at the regular session of the EU Advisory Group,
Mediamax reports.

Artur Baghdasaryan said that progress in 10 directions has been
registered in negotiations. At the same time there is still a lot to
be done yet.

Head of the EU Delegation to Armenia, Ambassador Traian Hristea said
for his part that “very positive steps” have been taken in 2012 in
Armenia-EU relations.

“We move with rapid steps in negotiations on Association Agreement
and we have serious reasons for optimism. I can say the same about
the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area Agreement,” Traian Hristea
said. –0–

Outsider Bogged Down In Protracted Battle For Aleppo

OUTSIDER BOGGED DOWN IN PROTRACTED BATTLE FOR ALEPPO

AlArabiya.net
November 1, 2012 Thursday
UAE

Munzir is still a teenager but he’s already a veteran of the Syrian
war. He fought in his hometown, driving out regime soldiers, and is
now trying to do the same in Aleppo.

Except that winning Aazaz only took a couple of weeks.

More than three months after moving into Syria’s commercial capital,
rebels lay claim to a patchwork of Sunni Arab neighborhoods dotted
across the north, south and east of Aleppo.

The fighting lays bare their inability to capture a metropolitan city
with limited weapons unknown to many of the fighters and to win over
some 2.5 million residents to a rebellion increasingly hijacked by
an Islamist agenda.

“It’s a very different fight here,” conceded Munzir as he got ready
to go home on leave for 48 hours after two months’ fighting.

“People in Aazaz worked with us and respected us, but here half the
people don’t protect us and don’t like us,” he said.

None of the 12 men in his unit come from Aleppo, which makes it all
the harder to fight urban warfare in such a large, unknown city.

Armed only with homemade bombs, Kalashnikovs, RPGs and machineguns,
it’s a painful fight, inch by inch. Munzir says his last operation
ended in retreat after one fighter was killed and four others were
wounded.

An AFP team watched last week as it took an hour and 10 minutes to
prepare and then take out a regime sniper position — essentially
blowing up one storey of an apartment block.

Abu Mohammed, a charismatic and respected commander in Aleppo who
claims to command 350 to 400 fighters under the United Salam Brigades,
concedes there is a lack of indigenous recruits in some units.

Sitting in olive groves where he is training men for commando
operations, he blames the problem on so many people fleeing Aleppo
when the fighting started, and clerics and businessmen in the city
who he says support the regime.

Air strikes and shelling have destroyed families, devastated homes
and ruined businesses. Mushrooming piles of rubbish lie rotting in
the streets.

People complain about power cuts, food shortages, rising fuel prices,
losing their jobs and of course, they are frightened.

But in rebel-held areas, few if any openly criticize the Free Syrian
Army (FSA), the main armed group fighting to bring down President
Bashar al-Assad.

At a checkpoint behind the frontline, a woman arrived in tears from
a visit to her daughter’s home, which the family abandoned in haste
under fire.

“I came to have a look and found everything stolen,” she sobbed,
clutching a few bags of children’s winter clothes.

The FSA offered little comfort other than putting her in a taxi and
discouraging AFP from asking her questions.

“We don’t know everyone here,” shrugged one of the fighters.

In the next street, retired Armenian teacher Kohareen ignored FSA
calls to evacuate. In her 60s, she says she has nowhere else to go.

Bombed-out buses seal off sniper alleys and Islamist graffiti has been
sprayed onto buildings of what was once a thriving, Muslim-Christian
community.

“We want peace for everyone, for everyone to come back home. Life was
good. We were comfortable,” she said. With a rebel gunman standing
below, she added: “God willing the FSA will protect us.”

‘Problem in Aleppo is the people’

She went back inside and defected lieutenant, Ahmed Saadeen, 24,
burst into complaints about why the city was taking so long to capture.

“The problem in Aleppo is the people. It’s as if they don’t care. For
one month I haven’t been home on leave, so how can they celebrate
(the recent Muslim holiday of) Eid while people are dying?” he said.

Experts say the battle for Aleppo will be protracted given the
rebels’ shortage of heavy weapons and with the regime keen to avoid
the international condemnation that would come from inflicting major
massacres.

Marwa Daoudy, a lecturer in international relations at Oxford
University, says Aleppo reflects the stalemate in the rest of the
country, but that its urban elites set it apart from disadvantaged
towns easily captured by the rebels.

The merchant class, Christians and Muslims, have prospered since the
economic reforms of 2005, she said.

Although they have become much more critical of the regime, many
people are nervous about insecurity and the future as the Islamist
agenda promoted by some of the rebel groups has hijacked the uprising.

“Clearly the basis for the FSA is very much in the poorer areas and
so far in the last year and a half the heart of Aleppo had been very
much outside the conflict except protests at the university,” Daoudy
told AFP.

“On the Christian side, they’re worried about the post-Assad period
in terms of the treatment of minorities, but the Sunnis are divided.

“People fear now for their security and the future of the country.

People also don’t know who some of the insurgents are and what their
agenda is,” she said.

Workers In Gyumri Demand Unpaid Wages

WORKERS IN GYUMRI DEMAND UNPAID WAGES

07:25 pm | November 02, 2012 | Social

A group of employees today gathered outside the Glendale Hills
construction company in Armenia’s Gyumri city to demand their unpaid
salaries. The protest was held in accordance with a preliminary
agreement. However, no representative from Yerevan turned up to meet
the protesters.

For more details, watch the video of Tsayg TV

http://www.a1plus.am/en/social/2012/11/02/gyumri

The Sore Losers Of The Syrian Crisis

THE SORE LOSERS OF THE SYRIAN CRISIS
By Thierry Meyssan

November 02, 2012 “Information Clearing House” – During a recent
Round Table in Ankara, Admiral James Winnfeld, Vice-Chairman of the
U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, announced that Washington would reveal
its intentions toward Syria once the 6 November presidential
elections were over. He made it plainly understood to his Turkish
counterparts that a peace plan had already been negotiated with
Moscow, that Bashar al-Assad would remain in power and that the
Security Council would not authorize the creation of buffer zones.

For his part, Herve Ladsous, the U.N. Assistant Secretary General for
Peacekeeping Operations, announced that he was studying the possible
deployment of peacekeepers (“blue helmets”) in Syria.

All regional actors are preparing for the cease-fire which will be
overseen by a U.N. force composed principally by troops of the
Collective Security Treaty Organization (Armenia, Belarus,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikstan). These events signify that
the United States is effectively continuing a process, begun in Iraq,
of retreat from the region and has accepted to share its influence
with Russian.

At the same time, the New York Times revealed that direct
negotiations between Washington and Iran are slated to restart even
as the United States continues its attack on Iranian monetary values.

It is becoming clear that, after 33 years of containment, Washington
is acknowledging that Teheran is an established regional power, all
the while continuing to sabotage its economy.

This new situation comes at the expense of Saudi Arabia, France,
Israel, Qatar and Turkey all of whom had placed their bets on regime
change in Damascus. This diverse coalition is now suffering divisions
between those demanding a consolation prize and those trying to
sabotage outright the process underway.

Ankara has already changed its tune. Recep Tayyip Erdogan, previously
ready for the worst, is now actively seeking reconciliation with
Teheran and Moscow. Several days after insulting the Iranians and
harrassing the Russian diplomats in his country, he is now all
smiles. He took advantage of the Organization of Economic Cooperation
in Baku to approach President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. He proposed a
complex framework for discussing the Syrian crisis which would allow
Turkey and Saudi Arabia not to be left by the wayside. Careful not to
humilate the losers in the conflict, the Iranian president indicated
he was open to such an initiative.

As for Qatar, it is already seeking new horizons for its ambitions.

Emir Hamad took off on a trip to Gaza, posing as the self-appointed
protector of Hamas. He advocates the overthrow of the King of Jordan,
the transformation of the Hashemite monarchy into a Palestinian
republic and the installation in power of his proteges from the
Muslim Brotherhood.

Only Israel and France remain in the opposition camp. The new scheme
would offer a guarantee of protection to the state of Israel but it
would also alter its special status on the international scene and
end its expansionist dreams. Tel-Aviv would be relegated to being a
secondary power. France, also, would lose influence in the region,
particularly in Lebanon. Accordingly, the intelligence services of
both states have concocted an operation to collapse the
U.S.-Russia-Iran agreement which, even if it fails, would allow them
to erase the traces of their involvement in the Syrian crisis.

France started by circulating the rumor that President Bashar
al-Assad sponsored a Hezbollah plan to assassinate five Lebanese
leaders: the head of the security forces, the head commander of the
Ministry of the Interior, the Grand Mufti, the Maronite Patriarch and
former prime minister, Fouad Siniora. Then, Paris took out Michel
Samaha, who had served as liaison to the Syrian armed forces but who,
having been disgraced in Damascus, was no longer of use. This
brilliant and adept politician fell into the trap set for him by
General Wassam el-Hassan, head of the Free Syrian Army and himself a
liaison with the Salafists. Next, Paris eliminated General Wassam
el-Hassan himself, who had not only become useless in the eventual
advent of peace in Syria but also dangerous because of what he knew.

The French rumor became reality : the number one name on the list of
targets is dead and a pro-Syrian figure was arrested as he was
preparing an attack on another name on the list.

At the core of these machinations is General Puga. The former
Commander of Special Operations and Director of French Military
Intelligence was the head of the personal general staff of President
Nicolas Sarkozy and has been retained in that post by Francois
Hollande. Linked by his unconditional support for the Jewish colonial
occupation of Palestine [1] and having close connections to American
neoconservatives, he carried forward French colonial policies in the
Ivory Coast, Libya and Syria. Bypassing democratic institutions, he
determined on his own the direction of French policy in the Middle
East, despite his having no official appointment.

[1] “Gaza: France oversees the extension of the Separation
Wall,”Voltaire Network, 26 December 2009.

Translated from French by Michele Stoddard