BAKU: Ankara Cancels Meeting Of EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Commit

ANKARA CANCELS MEETING OF EU-TURKEY JOINT PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE

Trend Daily News (Azerbaijan)
February 11, 2015 Wednesday 5:48 PM GMT +4

Baku, Azerbaijan, Feb.11
By Rufiz Hafizoglu – Trend:

Ankara has cancelled the next meeting of the EU-Turkey Joint
Parliamentary Committee as the committee’s agenda included discussions
on the “Armenian genocide”, Hurriyet newspaper reported on Feb.11.

The meeting was to be held on Feb.18-19 in Turkey’s Istanbul city.

Earlier, Turkey’s authorities warned the EU that Ankara will refuse
to hold the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee’s meeting if its
agenda includes discussions on the “Armenian genocide”.

Armenia and the Armenian lobby claim that Turkey’s predecessor, the
Ottoman Empire allegedly carried out “genocide” against the Armenians
living in Anatolia in 1915. Turkey in turn has always denied “the
genocide” took place.

While strengthening the efforts to promote the “genocide” in the
world, Armenians have achieved its recognition by the parliaments of
some countries.

Although Turkey has repeatedly proposed to create an independent
commission to investigate the events of 1915, Armenia continues to
reject this proposal.

Moreover, previously, Turkish authorities have repeatedly made gestures
to Armenia. Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s message to the Armenian people on
April 24, 2014 is one of such recent gestures.

Erdogan said in that message that the events of 1915 were a
difficult time not only for Armenians, but also for Arabs, Kurds and
representatives of other nations living in the country.

Countering Putin’s Grand Strategy

COUNTERING PUTIN’S GRAND STRATEGY

Wall Street Journal, NY
Feb 12 2015

With Europe weak and distracted, only the U.S. can thwart the Kremlin’s
growing ambitions.

By Robert D. Kaplan Feb. 11, 2015 7:20 p.m. ET

The heavy fighting in eastern Ukraine this week isn’t the only reason
to be skeptical about the prospects for the peace summit that began
Wednesday in Minsk, Belarus. Even if the meeting among Ukrainian
President Petro Poroshenko, Russian President Vladimir Puti n, German
Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Francois Hollande
produces a cease-fire agreement that holds up–unlike the one signed
last fall–the conflict’s underlying reality will remain unchanged:
The Russian-backed separatist revolt in eastern Ukraine is part of
Moscow’s larger grand strategy.

President Putin, who is consumed by historical humiliations, knows that
Russia was invaded not only by Napoleon and Hitler, but before that
also by the Swedes, Poles and Lithuanians. And so the Russian president
seeks a post-Warsaw Pact buffer zone in Central and Eastern Europe. The
Kremlin play book: imperialism by way of forcing energy dependence,
intelligence operations, criminal rackets, buying infrastructure and
media through third parties, the bribing of local politicians and
playing off the insecurities of ethnic minorities.

Mr. Putin may be an autocrat, but he finds weak democracies convenient
to his purpose. Their frail institutional and rule-of-law regimes make
his favored forms of subversion easier. Thus, Moldova, Bulgaria and
Serbia are particularly at risk while Romania, a member of the European
Union since 2007 and far more stable than Bulgaria, is less so.

Advertisement

Mr. Putin has a North European Plain strategy in the Baltic states and
Poland, which emphasizes dependence on natural gas and the manipulation
of Russian minorities in the Baltic states. He also has a Black Sea
strategy, as seen in his annexation of Crimea last year, his desire
for a land bridge between Crimea and separatist eastern Ukraine,
his military pressure on Georgia, and his friendship with Turkey’s
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan–it all advances Russian influence in
the adjacent Balkans, thus inside Europe.

Western sanctions against Russia and the weakening of the Russian
currency (because of the fall in oil prices) may constrain Mr. Putin
a bit, but Russian history reveals a strong tendency for hardship
at home and adventurism abroad. Dialing up nationalism amid economic
turmoil is the default option for autocrats.

Matching Russia’s multifaceted imperialism requires a multifaceted
U.S. counterstrategy: the coordinated use of sufficient military aid,
intelligence operations, electronic surveillance, economic sanctions,
information and cyberwarfare, and legal steps. The Obama administration
is already pursuing in part such a strategy, but without the intensity
and commitment necessary for success. This isn’t about going to war,
but about making Russia respect limits.

The Obama administration should intensify economic sanctions that
further squeeze Russia’s ability to do business with U.S. banks; help
allies build liquefied natural-gas terminals to reduce dependence
on Russian energy; offer more tools to allies to help them defend
against Russian cyberattacks; and launch a full-bore effort to get
Ukraine to strengthen its military and other institutions–call it
nation-building lite.

Other measures might include inviting recently elected Romanian
President Klaus Iohannis and other deserving Central and Eastern
European leaders on state visits to Washington, an increased tempo of
bilateral military exercises with allies bordering Russia, and offering
our friends more intelligence against Russian criminal organizations.

Above all, U.S. policy makers should understand that NATO’s Article
5–specifying that an armed attack against one member state will be
considered an attack on all members–doesn’t protect members against
Russian subversion from within. Thus supporting Ukraine militarily
means first getting the Kiev government and its fighting forces to
modernize by, among other things, embedding experts from NATO and
other organizations inside Ukrainian ministries and army units. Only
then will the Ukrainian military be able to absorb the extra arms
its allies should want to give it. This is the narrative Washington
needs to create. Ukraine’s best defense against Russia is to become
more of a viable Westernized state itself.

But there is another problem: Europe. The EU bureaucracy doesn’t want
to absorb the troubles of Ukraine’s 45 million people with their
corrupt institutions, and neither do most NATO member states. The
European appetite for helping Ukraine has not measured up to Russia’s
appetite for destabilizing it. The problem cannot be decoupled from
Europe’s own inability, despite its recently launched version of
quantitative easing, to deal decisively with the EU’s flatlining
economy. The bitter European truth is that not enough individual
countries will sacrifice for each other. So why should they sacrifice
for Ukraine?

Thus the U.S., in addition to dealing with an assertive yet
economically crumbling Russia, must also cope with a spineless Europe.

To defeat Russia’s geopolitical ambitions, U.S. strategy should
concentrate on protecting and fortifying what the Polish general and
patriot of the interwar era, Jozef Pilsudsk i, called the Intermarium
(Latin for “between the seas,” between the Baltic and Black seas,
that is). Pilsudski envisioned a belt of independent states stretching
from Estonia south to Bulgaria that could withstand Russian aggression
from the east and German aggression from the west.

But because Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Germany is such a benign and
conflicted power, even as Mr. Putin seeks to expand influence into
the old Soviet Union, the Intermarium must now extend from the Baltics
to the Caucasus, where the Russian strongman, in addition to putting
military pressure on Georgia, has made Armenia a virtual satellite
hosting thousands of Russian troops.

This means oil-rich Azerbaijan, its sorry human-rights record
notwithstanding, is a pivot state, along with Poland in northeastern
Europe and Romania in southeastern Europe. The recent flare-up in
fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the disputed territory
of Nagorno-Karabakh provides Russia even greater opportunities for
exerting influence, given that Moscow has armed both sides.

Meanwhile, Mr. Putin’s vision of an ever-enlarging separatist Ukraine
corresponds with what he has already achieved in Russian-occupied
Transnistria, a sliver of land virtually annexed from Moldova in the
early 1990s, where he has fashioned a murky smugglers’ paradise; 2,500
Russian troops are stationed there. Transnistria could be the future
of Ukraine if Mr. Obama doesn’t act. With Europe weak and distracted,
and Mr. Putin stoking nationalism in the midst of an economic crisis at
home, only the U.S. can be the organizing principle for strengthening
the Intermarium.

Mr. Kaplan, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security,
is the author of, among other books, “The Revenge of Geography: What
the Map Tells Us About Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate”
(Random House, 2012).

http://www.wsj.com/articles/robert-d-kaplan-countering-putins-grand-strategy-1423700448

ANKARA: Erdogan: Armenian Diaspora Hinders Peace Efforts And Dialogu

ERDOGAN: ARMENIAN DIASPORA HINDERS PEACE EFFORTS AND DIALOGUE

Daily Sabah, Turkey
Feb 11 2015

NURBANU KIZIL

Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan highlighted that Turkey
is ready for a constructive and objective approach to resolve the
tensions between Armenia and Turkey due to the 1915 incidents despite
the objection of the Armenian diaspora

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has said that every time Turkey tries to
approach Armenia to resolve the issues between the two countries, they
have been left without a response as the Armenian diaspora continues
to block Turkey’s efforts to establish peace through dialogue.

As part of his official visit to Colombia, Erdogan spoke on Tuesday
at a symposium co-organized by Bogota Externado University and Ankara
University and urged Armenia to examine the 1915 events in a more
objective manner through the lens of science and not politics. He also
said that Turkey is sincere in its readiness to investigate the issue
in order to reach accurate conclusions. He highlighted that the 1915
events have not been properly examined or discussed.

“On the 100th anniversary of the 1915 events, as Turkey we repeat our
sincere call to Armenia,” Erdogan said, urging Armenians to take a
more proactive and objective approach and let scholars and academics
investigate the matter rather than politicians.

Erdogan said that Armenian leaders rejected Turkey’s invitation to
attend the ceremony organized in Canakkale to commemorate the 100th
anniversary of the Battle of Gallipoli in a discourteous manner
and that their offensive statements closed the doors of dialogue
once again.

“We wanted them to be in Canakkale on April 24 and breathe the spirit
in the air, try to comprehend what hundreds of thousands of Turkish
martyrs experienced,” Erdogan said, and reiterated that Turkey will
not give up its efforts to reach peace and dialogue with respect to
the 1915 events.

He underscored that Turkey has always been against conflicts and crises
in the region and has made rational and justified objections to such
attempts. “We want peace, justice, friendship and brotherhood in our
region,” he said, adding that Turkey is not requesting anything else.

In January, Erdogan sent invitation letters to over 100 world leaders
to take part in the ceremonies commemorating the 100oth anniversary
of the Battle of Gallipoli on April 24.

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan reportedly rejected Erdogan’s
invitation as being a “short-sighted” attempt to cover the 100th year
commemoration of the 1915 events.

In a the speech, Erdogan said that understanding World War I was
crucial to comprehending the current state of events in the world as
it drew the borders of the current nation-states, which had serious
implications for today.

“Many of our global problems today are rooted in World War I,” he
said, explaining that the issue in Palestine and conflicts in Iraq,
Yemen, Egypt, North Africa, the Caucasus and the Balkans can all be
traced back to the war.

“The borders were not only drawn for territories, but were also imposed
on the people,” Erdogan said, arguing that abstract borders had been
forcefully imposed on people’s mentalities, cultures and religions
and that siblings had been made enemies.

The 1915 events occurred during World War I when a segment of
Armenians living under the Ottoman Empire supported the Russian
invasion and revolted against the state and were relocated to eastern
Anatolia. While Turkey refrains from using the term “genocide” to refer
to the incident, as many Turks also lost their lives due to attacks
carried out by Armenian gangs in Anatolia, the Armenian state and
diaspora are campaigning for the incident to be recognized as genocide.

Erdogan issued a letter expressing condolences for the 1915 events
on April 23, 2014, which was unprecedented in Turkey’s history. In
the letter, he urged for the establishment of a joint historical
commission to investigate the events and called Armenia to open their
archives as Turkey has done.

http://www.dailysabah.com/diplomacy/2015/02/11/erdogan-armenian-diaspora-hinders-peace-efforts-and-dialogue

BAKU: Turkish President: If Armenians Have Official Documents On The

TURKISH PRESIDENT: IF ARMENIANS HAVE OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS ON THEIR UNFOUNDED CLAIMS, SO LET THEM OPEN THOSE DOCUMENTS

The Azerbaijan State Telegraph Agency
Feb 11 2015

Istanbul, February 11, AzerTAc

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has strongly criticized the
Armenian leadership and diaspora organizations for insincerity towards
Turkey.According to Anadolu Agency, the Turkish President, who spoke
during his official visit to Colombia, said Armenia`s and Armenian
diaspora organizations` claims against Turkey are fully groundless.

“The only way to reveal the truth about these imaginary claims is to
open archives.” “Turkey has taken the first step on this front. More
than one million documents from the archives uncovered false claims of
Armenia against Turkey,” said Mr Erdogan.”If Armenians have official
documents on their unfounded claims, so let them open those documents,”
he added.

Sabir Shahtakhtı

http://azertag.az/en/xeber/831625

ANKARA: Erdogan Reaffirms Turkey’s Peace Efforts With Armenia Over 1

ERDOGAN REAFFIRMS TURKEY’S PEACE EFFORTS WITH ARMENIA OVER 1915 EVENTS

Anadolu Agency, Turkey
Feb 11 2015

by Hatice Kesgin and Izabela Kuczynska

BOGOTA, Colombia (AA) -Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan called
on Armenia to examine the 1915 events through the lens of science
and not politics.

“Let us remove the 1915 events from the area of politics and refer to
science and scientists,” Erdogan said during a symposium on the topic,
co-organized by the Bogota Externado University and Ankara University.

Erdogan attended the event as part of his official visit to Colombia
Tuesday and said that what the Armenians did against the Turks
and what the Turks did against the Armenians 100 years ago was not
properly discussed.

“We have made an effort to fix relations with Armenia and to open
a new page,” the Turkish president said. “Unfortunately, our peace
hand has always been rejected by the influence of Armenian diaspora.”

“This year is the 100th anniversary. We are still reiterating our
sincere call,” Erdogan added.

In January, the Turkish president sent invitation letters to more
than 100 leaders, including Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan,
to participate in the commemoration of the Battle of Canakkale on
April 24.

Sargsyan reportedly denounced Erdogan’s invitation as a “short-sighted”
attempt to overshadow the 100th anniversary of the 1915 events,
according to ArmeniaNow.com.

The 1915 events took place during World War I when a portion of the
Armenian population living in the Ottoman Empire sided with the
invading Russians and revolted against the empire. The uprisings
came about after a decision by the empire to relocate Armenians in
eastern Anatolia.

Armenia and Armenian diaspora term the events as “genocide” and ask
for compensation, whereas Turkey officially refutes this description,
saying that although Armenians died during relocations, many Turks also
lost their lives in attacks carried out by Armenian gangs in Anatolia.

“We will not give up in our efforts for peace and dialogue with
respect to the 1915 events,” Erdogan said.

At the end of his speech, Erdogan said he is thankful to the Ankara
University Research and Application Centre for Latin American Studies
(LAMER), an academic centre that was established in 2009.

-Turkey’s “very clear” stance on Israel

Erdogan said that Turkey’s stance on Israel was very clear.

“Israel should draw back to its 1967 borders, while a Palestinian
state with East Jerusalem as its capital should be established and
sovereign rights of the Palestinians should be respected,” he said.

Turkey’s president added that Turkey has objected many times to
Israel’s expansion policy and severe massacres.

“Turkey has paid a heavy price for terrorism in the country and
is certainly and clearly against all forms of terror and terrorist
organizations,” Erdogan said, adding that Turkey had no intention of
interfering in a country’s borders, territory or home affairs.

Trapped In Baku

TRAPPED IN BAKU

Foreign Policy
Feb 11 2015

A press freedom advocate — and husband of an American servicewoman —
went to the U.S. embassy in Azerbaijan, fearing for his life. But he
was turned away.

by Michael Weiss

An Azerbaijani dissident married to a U.S. servicewoman has spent the
last half-year living in the Swiss embassy in Baku, denied protection
by the American embassy there. The 35-year-old human rights defender
Emin Huseynov has long been persecuted by the authoritarian government
of Ilham Aliyev and since August 2014 has been hosted by the Swiss
embassy for humanitarian reasons after he went into hiding last summer,
fearing his arrest was imminent.

The Swiss television show “Rundschau” broke the news today, and the
Swiss Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed Huseynov’s residence in
its embassy. The story of how he got there six-and-a-half months
ago resembles an international thriller redolent of Argo, though
conspicuously absent of U.S. involvement. It was relayed exclusively
to Foreign Policy by sources close to Huseynov in advance of today’s
announcement.

As chairman of the Institute for Reporters’ Freedom and Safety (IRFS),
a local NGO, Huseynov is one of many victims of an intense government
crackdown on free speech and civil society that has taken place
in Azerbaijan over the past year — a crackdown that has surprised
even hardened human rights monitors. In May 2014, Anar Mammadli, the
chairman of the highly regarded Election Monitoring and Democracy
Studies Center (EMDS), was sentenced to five-and-a-half years in
prison for spurious charges which included tax evasion and illegal
entrepreneurship; his real crime, according to human rights monitors,
was reporting on the Aliyev government’s election-rigging. Meanwhile,
the executive director of EMDS, Bashir Suleymanli, got three-and-a-half
years in jail. Then in July, Leyla Yunus, a noted democracy and peace
activist working on the reconciliation of the Nagorno-Karabakh crisis,
was arrested on a suite of similarly concocted charges that include
high treason and spying on behalf of Armenia; her husband, Arif Yunis,
was also taken into custody on treason and fraud allegations. Finally
in August, two Azerbaijani legal activists — Rasul Jafarov and
Intigam Aliyev — were rounded up.

That same month, fearing for his life, Huseynov went into hiding.

According to sources, his bank accounts were first frozen in June,
and yet Huseynov was still able to leave the country, which he did
to attend a session at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council
of Europe (PACE) in Strasbourg where he and Jafarov put on an event
exposing Aliyev’s suffocation of civil society in Azerbaijan. After
Jafarov was detained, Huseynov sensed the net closing on him. In
early August, Huseynov attended an event at the U.S. embassy in Baku
where he eventually found himself alone with the Charge d’Affaires
Dereck Hogan. The American ambassador, Richard Morningstar, had
left Azerbaijan only a week earlier, leaving the embassy without a
diplomatic head. According to sources, Huseynov scribbled a note on a
piece of paper which he passed to Hogan: “What kind of assistance can
you provide me? I am in danger of arrest.” Hogan said he couldn’t help.

“[Huseynov] never had a bad relationship with Dereck,” said one source
who requested anonymity. “He never criticized the embassy and tried
to be diplomatic even when he criticized U.S. policy in Azerbaijan.”

Foreign Policy tried to contact Hogan at the embassy and was referred
instead to the State Department in Washington. No one responded to
inquiries by press time.

On August 6, Huseynov tried to leave the country to receive medical
treatment in Turkey, but was stopped by border control and turned
back. The day after that, August 8, colleagues from his office called
to inform him that the headquarters of IRFS was being surveilled by
state security, and warned Huseynov not to come to work. The office
was then raided, prompting rumors in the Azerbaijani press that
Huseynov had been arrested. He hadn’t. Instead, he went into hiding,
which only amplified speculation as to his whereabouts. Press reports
said he had fled to the U.S. embassy, which on August 12 put out
a statement denying that it was harboring him — a two-line denial
that many familiar with the case said read uncomfortably like a total
repudiation of an embattled dissident. But Washington wasn’t totally
unsympathetic to his predicament: the U.S. mission to the Organization
for Security and Cooperation in Europe issued a blanket statement
on August 14 calling on Baku to “halt the continuing arrests of
peaceful activists, to stop freezing organizations’ and individuals’
bank accounts, and to release those who have been incarcerated
in connection with the exercise of their fundamental freedoms,”
mentioning the Yunuses, Jafarov, and Huseynov by name.

But the fact that Huseynov, while not a U.S. citizen himself, has
an American wife ought to have made his case more of a priority to
the State Department, according to human rights monitors and one
ex-diplomat.

A few European countries allegedly offered to take Huseynov in; he
opted for Switzerland, owing to its embassy’s proximity to his hideout.

“He totally changed his physical appearance, he dyed his hair, wore
a disguise,” one source relayed.

“He totally changed his physical appearance, he dyed his hair, wore
a disguise,” one source relayed. “Emin even did test runs: he’d go
out in disguise to see if people recognized him.”

On August 18, he made a play for the embassy grounds. A car driven
by an Azeri confidante, who evidently had to flee the country after
his identity was uncovered, dropped him off a few blocks away. The
authorities were aware that Huseynov was attempting refuge in a
foreign country and had begun staking out embassy entrances in Baku.

“Emin was walking to the embassy and realized there’s tons of
plainclothes cops,” said a source familiar with Huseynov’s story.

“They tried to talk to him. He spoke to them in broken English to
try and throw them off. They asked to see his passport. ‘No, no,’
he said, ‘the Swiss have my passport.’ They didn’t recognize him at
first. He rang the doorbell to the embassy, as the cops were still
interrogating him. Someone opened the door and pulled him inside. A
five-second hesitation and Emin swears he’d have been nabbed.”

Huseynov would spend the next several months living on Swiss soil in
his native country, flanked by a 24-hour police cordon of the embassy.

The Aliyev government has not publicly acknowledged his presence in
the Swiss embassy and, until today, the Swiss hadn’t either, although
they’ve been negotiating with the Aliyev government for Huseynov’s
safe passage out of Azerbaijan.

His case was known to a number of human rights monitors that Foreign
Policy contacted for comment, such as Giorgi Gogia, the South Caucasus
specialist at Human Rights Watch. “I know that the Swiss government
has been negotiating at the highest level possible with Azerbaijan,”
Gogia said. “And I know the Azerbaijan government has been against
letting Emin leave. It’s crazy that this is ongoing.”

Huseynov’s safe conduct out of the country is particularly critical
because the last time he was arrested — for attending a party
celebrating the birthday of Che Guevara — he was beaten by police so
badly he wound up in intensive care and had to be treated for head and
brain trauma. That was in 2008. Huseynov’s younger brother, Mehman,
a video blogger and photojournalist who also works for IRFS, was also
targeted by the police in 2012 for drawing attention to human rights
violations during the Eurovision Song Contest held in Baku that year.

In October 2014, Mehman was again arrested and brought to the
Investigation Department of the Prosecutor General for Serious Crimes.

He, too, has also been barred from leaving Azerbaijan.

According to Gogia, while Azerbaijan’s record on human rights has
always been dismal, conditions have grown infinitely worse recently.

“Three major things have happened that have never happened before.

First, the government arrested the towering figures of the NGO
movements. Second, since last January, it hasn’t registered a single
foreign grant. In the past, you had to register a grant at the
Ministry of Justice, but it was a pro forma procedure and no one was
refused. Third, the government went after and froze the bank accounts
of over 50 NGOs and their leaders, including [Huseynov]. Very suddenly,
from a very bad human rights record, it turned into a closed-country
human rights record. It was really hard and shocking to see how fast
the country was closing down. And the perverse irony is that all this
is taking place as Azerbaijan chairs the Council of Ministers at PACE.”

One former American diplomat questions the U.S. embassy’s hands-off
approach. “If the embassy knew that person was married to an American
citizen, that would require more than if this were just a normal
Azerbaijani citizen facing harassment or arrest by the police,”
said Richard Kauzlarich, who served as ambassador to Azerbaijan in
1994-1997. “There’s not much you can do for your average everyday
citizen of the country you’re embassy is in, but if it’s the spouse
of one our own, that changes things.”

Curiously, while Huseynov was running for his life, another urgent
human rights episode occurred, again ensnaring the U.S. embassy in
Baku — this one seemingly less complicated, however, as it concerned
someone with dual Azerbaijani-American citizenship.

Said Nuri, who became a U.S. citizen in 2012 after six years of
political asylum, was used to traveling back to Azerbaijan without
incident, albeit with a tail of police surveillance. “The government
followed me everywhere, took my pictures. Sitting in cafe or restaurant
— they put a camera on the next table taping us. Even my friends
published articles about that,” Nuri said. But then, last August, he
applied for a visa to visit his father, whom he had just discovered
had been diagnosed with terminal cancer. “I was in Ukraine at the
time, so I went to the Azerbaijani embassy in Kiev. It took three
weeks to get the visa. I went to Baku. I stayed seven days with my
family. Then, when I was trying to fly back to Kiev, the authorities
told me I couldn’t leave. ‘There’s a travel ban on you,’ the minister
of national security and general prosecutor office’s said.”

So Nuri went to the U.S. embassy. “They were confused. It took them
two hours to get back to me to confirm the travel ban. But they
didn’t give me much information. ‘It’s a domestic issue,’ I was
told. The next day, the general prosecutor released statement that
I need to be questioned regarding some criminal charges. I hired a
lawyer, went to the prosecutor’s office and was interrogated for six
hours. They asked me about affiliation with the U.S. government, if
I was CIA. They asked about my relationship to NGOs, journalists. How
did I get asylum and then citizenship? Why did I travel to Ukraine so
often? Why did I have pictures from the Maidan [the central square in
Kiev then roiled in revolution]? They were accusing me of espionage
and all these questions related to U.S. government and U.S.-funded
programs, the National Endowment for Democracy, and so on.”

Nuri’s lawyer informed him that the authorities planned to charge
him with spying on behalf of the United States. But the U.S. embassy,
Nuri insists, was useless.

Nuri’s lawyer informed him that the authorities planned to charge him
with spying on behalf of the United States. But the U.S. embassy,
Nuri insists, was useless. He obtained letters from then-Freedom
House President David Kramer and Sen. John McCain arguing his brief,
but the diplomatic response from an embassy official Nuri declined
to name was, roughly: “We understand you’re our citizen, but the
problem is you’re on foreign soil and this country is claiming you’re
also their citizen. It’s a sovereign country, so we can’t intervene
in their domestic policies.” The Aliyev government, meanwhile, was
trying to co-opt him, promising him a better life if he remained in
Azerbaijan and publicly repudiated his American citizenship. Where
gentle persuasion failed, the government resorted to other means:
“They taped me having sex with my girlfriend and tried to blackmail
me,” says Nuri. The whole ordeal then ended almost as spontaneously as
it had begun. After eight days of intense grilling and intimidation,
Nuri was deported and his Azerbaijani citizenship revoked. He now
lives in Chicago.

“Azerbaijan has shown they’re prepared to do unpleasant things to
American citizens and people associated with American organizations,
such as RFE/RL,” Ambassador Kauzlarich said, referring to the December
2014 imprisonment of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty contributor
Khadija Ismayilova, a pioneering anti-corruption journalist who
previously had her home bugged and, like Nuri, was surreptitiously
recorded having sex, the tape of which was leaked on the Internet.

According to Kauzlarich, the government has now all but declared Cold
War on the United States. “In my time, having an association with an
American didn’t buy you protection but there was a willingness not to
do certain things that would cause problems in the relationship. Now
I just don’t think they care.”

For dissidents, the worry is that the Obama administration doesn’t
seem particularly bothered by what’s happening in the oil-rich
authoritarianism on the Caspian, which, as I previously reported,
has spent the last half-decade expending enormous energy and money
lobbying the United States and Europe for political influence.

“I went to an event the other day here in Washington where State
Department officials announced that they’re going to pursue engagement
policy with the Aliyev government,” Alakbar Raufoglu, an opposition
journalist at the D.C.-based TURAN News Agency, told FP. “They didn’t
mention they’re going to highlight a crackdown on democratic activity.

They said they’ll support RFE/RL as much as they can but engagement
policy is number one right now.” For Raufoglu, the future of this
relationship can be seen in microcosm in a video released just
yesterday by the newly appointed U.S. ambassador to Azerbaijan,
Robert Cekuta. “Look at what he said the U.S. priorities are: First is
regional security, second is economic growth, and third is democratic
development. Nothing has changed even as the regime has grown worse,”
said Raufoglu. “This is a chilling message that they’re leaving
us behind.”

As for Huseynov, now that his whereabouts are internationally known,
his fate remains uncertain. Living out of an embassy can be a long-time
affair. Just ask WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who obtained asylum
from Ecuador fearing extradition to Sweden to face questioning over
allegations of sexual assault.* He has not left the Ecuadorian embassy
in London for nearly three years. The Swiss mission in Baku is hardly
a sprawling palatial compound. “It’s a little tiny embassy,” a source
involved in his case said.

http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/02/11/trapped-in-baku-azerbaijan-emil-huseynov-swiss-embassy/

Tsarukyan In Moscow: PAP Leader Meets With Political Forces In Russi

TSARUKYAN IN MOSCOW: PAP LEADER MEETS WITH POLITICAL FORCES IN RUSSIA

Politics | 12.02.15 | 14:55

GOHAR ABRAHAMYAN
ArmeniaNow reporter

A two-day visit to Moscow by Prosperous Armenia Party leader
GagikTsarukyan in which the powerful businessman met with political
leaders in the Russian capital has raised speculation in Yerevan over
the oppositional party’s intentions at home.

PAP – which calls itself the “alternative” party – is the powerbase
of the “troika”, which including Armenian Revolutionary Federation
and Heritage parties, form the core of Armenia’s political opposition.

Last week,Tsarukyan called a conference during which he said that
the country needs early elections.

The massage spread by the conference secretariat summarized
the results, and among other questions, it addressed President
SerzhSargsyan’s initiative of constitutional changes which was
considered unacceptable and it said that if “the government,
nevertheless, does not listen to the social and political opinion and
turns to a referendum, then that day must be declared a NO referendum
day and start 24-hour national protests, with a demand for a change
of government.”

StepanSafaryan, a political analyst, the founder and president of the
Armenian Institute of International and Security Affairs, thinks that
the very question of constitutional reforms took Tsarukyan to Russia.

“March is symbolic in the sense that SerzhSragsyan’s final position on
constitutional reforms will be announced. In Autumn, GagikTsarukyan
probably blocked the protest movement, because he considered the
delay of adopting constitutional reforms a victory of the troika,” the
political analyst said. He added that now when the ruling Republican
Party of Armenia (RPA) is discussing the question of reforms at its
Supreme Body meetings and it seems like an answer will soon be heard,
and junior Republicans are hinted about constitutional changes, another
mobilization of forces is taking place in the non-political field.

“The PAP takes a few steps, the first being the conference as an
act of unifying the opposition, the second – the hint about early
elections, and the third – the visit to Russia and meetings,” the
political analyst said.

http://armenianow.com/news/politics/60568/gagiktsarukyan_prosperous_armenia_party_serzh_sargsyan

Central Bank Forced To Take Step That’ll Make Things Worse

CENTRAL BANK FORCED TO TAKE STEP THAT’LL MAKE THINGS WORSE

Roza Hovhannisyan, Reporter
Business – 12 February 2015, 13:01

The Central Bank has set a refinancing rate at 10.5%, which will make
the situation in the Armenian economy worse, the economist Vardan
Bostanjyan told Lragir.am, commenting on the Central Bank’s decision.

On February 10 the Central Bank increased the rate of refinancing by
1%, setting the rate at 10.5%. The reason for such a decision was the
inflation rate in January which exceeded the rate target. According
to the clarification of the Central Bank, in January 2015 inflation
was at 2.5%, 12-month inflation by the end of January was 4.3%,
being very close to the rate target.

The Central Bank finds that over the next months the 12-month inflation
will rise a little.

“A 10.5% refinancing rate is an obviously negative indicator but the
monetary authorities are not doing it for their pleasure. The bad
scenario of current inflation in the country, as well as instability
in the financial market supposes and requires increase of the interest
rate. The monetary authorities have no alternative to this step but
this is a very negative phenomenon for the economy,” Bostanjyan says.

A raised rate of refinancing means that banks will increase interest
rate on loans.

Vardan Bostanjyan notes that the Armenian economy is facing lack of
investments, SMEs are paralyzed, about 10,000 SMEs have closed.

“At the moment, statistics indicates that inflation is higher than
the projected rate. In reality, it is a bigger number than official
statistics states. In this situation the monetary authorities were
forced to increase the refinancing rate,” he noted.

The economist thinks the efforts of the organizations in charge of
the financial sector are not enough, a coordinated economic policy
must be conducted.

“Without coordination we should simply expect the negative consequences
what we are seeing now,” Vardan Bostanjyan said.

Note that according to the NSS, in January 2015 inflation reported
in the consumer market was at 2.5% compared with December 2014 due
to a 4.5% increase of food prices. In January prices of almost all
kinds of food increased compared with January 2014. Mostly the prices
of necessity goods increased. Prices of bread increased by 10.4%
compared with last January.

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/economy/view/33623#sthash.g7x0MEtt.dpuf

Nothing New: ARF Member Says Ter-Petrosyan Remains True To Failed Po

NOTHING NEW: ARF MEMBER SAYS TER-PETROSYAN REMAINS TRUE TO FAILED POLICY ON TURKEY

Genocide | 12.02.15 | 10:39

GOHAR ABRAHAMYAN
ArmeniaNow reporter

related news

Ter-Petrosyan: ‘Genocide Centennial Declaration’ to affect
Armenian-Turkish normalization

A chief foreign-policy spokesman for the Armenian Revolutionary
Federation (ARF) sees nothing new in the criticism of Armenia’s
first president regarding the Pan-Armenian Declaration on the 100th
Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide. According to Giro Manoyan,
Turkey’s president would readily sign under many of the thoughts
voiced by Levon Ter-Petrosyan.

Ter-Petrosyan, who led Armenia as its first president in 1991-1998
and today heads the opposition Armenian National Congress party,
voiced criticism regarding some points and aspects of the Declaration
in an article published by the Ilur.am news website and the Chorrord
Ishkhanutyun newspaper on Wednesday.

His main criticism concerned the paragraph of the 12-point Declaration
that “expresses the united will of Armenia and the Armenian people
to achieve worldwide recognition of the Armenian Genocide and the
elimination of the consequences of the Genocide, preparing to this
end a file of legal claims as a point of departure in the process of
restoring individual, communal and pan-Armenian rights and legitimate
interests.”

Ter-Petrosyan suggested that the policy of claims will “extremely
complicate and, for a long time, suspend Armenian-Turkish
normalization, a process that is very necessary for Armenia’s future.”

Giro Manoyan, Director of the International Secretariat of the ARF
Bureau in Yerevan, says that although Ter-Petrosyan’s policy in the
matter of relations with Turkey had failed to produce the expected
result, he still remains committed to his stance and continues to
insist that Armenia should continue that way.

“He says that no one can speak on behalf of all Armenians. It means
that we can never have a pan-Armenian view and present anything as
a pan-Armenian view. This is also his [Ter-Petrosyan’s] approach to
seeing Armenians as separate parts,” Manoyan told ArmeniaNow.

To Manoyan it is also unclear why Ter-Petrosyan thinks that by
supporting representatives of Turkish society who recognize the
Armenian Genocide the Declaration puts them in danger.

“In other words, according to Ter-Petrosyan, we have nothing to do,
everything is up to Turkey to decide. It is Turkish nationalists who
should be deciding, and we have to follow obediently,” he commented.

“There is nothing new in what he [Ter-Petrosyan] said, just as there
is nothing new in the Declaration. When Ter-Petrosyan says that it is
a “fruitless” document, if it is really so, it is regretful that he
wasted his time for writing an article about it. But, nonetheless,
he expressed his view, a view that has proved wrong based on his
own experience.”

Vartan Oskanian, who served as Armenia’s foreign minister in
1998-2008, also made a comment following Ter-Petrosyan’s article. He,
in particular, pointed out contradictions between the Declaration
and the Turkish-Armenian protocols that were signed in 2009 and are
now still on the “big agenda” of the Armenian parliament.

“The contradictions between the two documents, to put it mildly,
weaken the affirmation in the Declaration of the issues related to
the Armenian Genocide recognition and legal claims regardless of what
we think about the expedience of raising them in the Declaration,”
Oskanian wrote on his Facebook account.

Ara Papyan, a lawyer, historian and diplomat who heads a Yerevan-based
think tank, Modus Vivendi, also considers the Declaration to be
realistic only if the Armenian parliament revokes the Zurich protocols.

http://armenianow.com/genocide/60550/armenia_genocide_100_declaration_levon_terpetrosyan_reactions

Gagik Tsarukyan Promises 100 Thousand Dollars For Valuable Informati

GAGIK TSARUKYAN PROMISES 100 THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR VALUABLE INFORMATION: 7OR.AM

18:37 | February 12,2015 | Politics

Today Gagik Tsarukyan has visited the RA Police. He has met with
Police Chief Vladimir Gasparyan. Gagik Tsarukyan has inquired about
the process of investigation of the crime against “Kasetsum” movement
activist, member of Political Council of Prosperous Armenia Party
Artak Khachatryan.

BHK President Gagik Tsarukyan promises 100 thousand US dollars to a
person or people, who will give valuable information and will help to
reveal the criminals and organizers of the crime against “Kasetsum”
movement activist, member of Political Council of Prosperous Armenia
Party Artak Khachatryan.

More here

http://www.7or.am/am/news/view/82437/
http://en.a1plus.am/1205893.html