Newly-interpreted Anoush opera premieres in Yerevan

Newly-interpreted Anoush opera premieres in Yerevan

April 27, 2013 – 12:06 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Armenian-French project, sponsored VivaCell-MTS, is
a mixture of conceptual and technological solutions.

Cannes Film Festival award-winner Serge Avedikian and French
choreographer Nicolas Musin have given `fresh breath’ to Armen
Tigranyan’s Anoush opera. The opera with 100 years of history with its
new interpretation is a bold call: to reevaluate the strongly-held
stereotypes of the society by adopting human approach and behavior.

The joint Armenian-French project, sponsored VivaCell-MTS, is a
mixture of conceptual and technological solutions. When working on
their realization, the producer and choreographer tried to keep in
line with the general concept of Tigranyan, and not to nontradict it.
At the same time, they gave it entire breadth and depth of the
modernity. The realization of this ambitious project, including its
conceptual, financial as well as production components took over 2
years.

`There are works of art, which are a creation of a certain epoch, and
drew tremendous admiration of the public. However, there are some
works, which do not lose their shine and actuality, perceived as an
unsurpassed value. The literary heritage of the All-Armenian Poet –
Hovhannes Tumanyan, is another representation of this. Geniously
simple and deeply insightful poem is regarded today as having a
universal value. It’s a pride to sponsor a noble initiative like this,
the purpose of which is to make us to rethink once again over the
whole heritage left by Tumanyan,’ VivaCell-MTS General Manager Ralph
Yirikian said.

The next staging of it will be in Paris, VivaCell-MTS press service reported.

L’Ukraine cherche à raffiner le pétrole d’Azerbaïdjan

ENERGIE
L’Ukraine cherche à raffiner le pétrole d’Azerbaïdjan

Le ministre ukrainien de l’Energie et des Mines, Edouard Stavytski, a
annoncé l’intention de l’Ukraine d’importer du pétrole brut
d’Azerbaïdjan, pour le raffiner sur son territoire. Le sujet était au
menu des discussions lors de sa visite à Bakou, en début de semaine.

D’après Kiev, l’approvisionnement serait désormais faisable
techniquement, et plusieurs pays européens, dont la République
tchèque, la Hongrie et la Slovaquie, seraient intéressés pour acheter
l’or noir d’Azerbaïdjan.

L’oléoduc Odessa-Brody permettrait d’acheminer le pétrole vers les
raffineries ukrainiennes. Achevé en 2002, il n’a pas été utilisé faute
d’accord commercial entre l’Ukraine et les compagnies concernées. En
2004, Kiev avait autorisé la Russie à l’utiliser pour expédier sa
propre production.

L’Ukraine et l’Europe cherchent à diversifier leur approvisionnement
énergétique, afin de moins dépendre de la Russie. Les ressources en
hydrocarbures de la mer Capsienne sont envisagées comme l’une des
solutions alternatives.

samedi 27 avril 2013,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

Pourquoi le négationnisme ?

REVUE DE PRESSE
Pourquoi le négationnisme ?
Par Serge GÉLALIAN

Des progrès notoires ont lieu en Turquie ces derniers temps. Le
gouvernement turc négocie avec le PKK, son ennemi acharné ; il a
avalisé une loi régulant l’immigration et le droit d’asile ; le
Premier ministre souhaite établir un système politique décentralisé ;
les femmes voilées apparaissent de plus en plus au travail, à
l’université, dans les professions libérales. L’armée n’a plus voix au
chapitre. La Turquie tourne le dos à Atatürk. La Turquie veut
restituer son rôle perdu au début de la Première Guerre mondiale
(Ahmet Davutoðlu parle de néo-ottomanisme ; nous dirions plutôt
néo-ottomanie). La Turquie continue de nier le génocide arménien.

Pourquoi cela, alors que des voix turques se font entendre sur ce
sujet depuis quelques années ? Pourquoi le génocide arménien n’est-il
pas reconnu par la Turquie actuelle, du moment que cette république
est en principe fondée sur le rejet de l’Empire ottoman ? Signalons
ici que la Turquie a poursuivi le principe du génocide jusque
dernièrement dans son combat avec les Kurdes. Entre-temps et depuis
l’avènement d’Atatürk, tout ce qui n’était pas pur Turc a été éliminé
: mis à part les Arméniens, ce sont les Grecs, les Assyriens et tous
les autres chrétiens qui ont été annihilés selon le principe « La
Turquie aux seuls Turcs ». Même les Kurdes y ont eu droit alors même
que des troupes kurdes (le bataillon Hamidiyé) avaient participé aux
massacres de 1915, mais surtout deux décennies plus tôt entre 1894 et
1896 sur le plateau anatolien, du temps de Abdul Hamid II. Écartons le
fait que la Turquie ne souhaite pas du tout entendre parler de
dédommagements aux Arméniens suite aux biens considérables qu’elle
leur a confisqués durant cette période du début du XXe siècle pour sa
guerre d’indépendance. Car le gros du financement de cette guerre
d’indépendance provenait des biens et argent saisis aux Arméniens
durant le génocide. Écartons aussi le fait que le mot « excuse » ne
figure pas dans le lexique turc, ce qui est normal vu que les Turcs
actuels sont en quelque sorte les héritiers des Ottomans eux-mêmes
héritiers des Seldjoukides eux-mêmes cousins d’Attila et de
Timour-Lenk dont on connaît les hauts faits pour l’humanité. Écartons
enfin le fait qu’il y ait une continuité entre la période ottomane et
la Turquie laïque d’Atatürk car des Ottomans ayant participé au
génocide ont fait partie de l’élite politique et administrative du
nouveau régime républicain, comme par exemple Ali Cenani bey (ministre
de l’Industrie). Moustafa Kemal a fermé les yeux sur leur passé comme
il avait fermé les yeux sur le génocide alors qu’il était engagé sur
le front de Gallipoli. Cela l’arrangeait en un sens parce que ce
génocide servait son idéologie de la race turque pure. N’oublions pas
non plus qu’il avait voulu épurer la langue turque des souillures
étrangères, arabes et persanes notamment. Alors pourquoi le génocide
arménien demeure-t-il tabou en Turquie ? Pourquoi le simple fait de le
mentionner rend les Turcs furieux ? Il semble qu’il y aurait une
raison : l’ampleur des Turcs de souche arménienne, les
crypto-Arméniens. Ils seraient des millions, selon une série
d’historiens cités par le chercheur Bared Manok, mis à part les
Arméniens du Hamchen qui se réduisent de plus en plus. Déjà, dès le
règne de Abdul Hamid II, les Arméniens étaient massacrés et leurs
enfants islamisés et turquisés de force. Cette islamisation s’est
poursuivie et a connu un pic durant le génocide soit parce que des
rescapés avaient été sauvés par des Kurdes et s’étaient convertis pour
échapper aux massacres, soit parce que des femmes et des jeunes filles
avaient été enlevées, violées, violentées par les bourreaux puis
intégrées de force dans des familles turques. Leurs descendants sont
actuellement des Turcs d’origine arménienne. Certains le découvrent
maintenant et tentent de remonter leur arbre généalogique. Quand ils y
parviennent, ils se convertissent au christianisme et vivent leur
arménité. Cela ne va pas sans des tiraillements et autres grincements
de dents au sein de leurs familles. Il est donc probable que les
gouvernements turcs qui se sont succédé depuis la naissance de la
république craignent des remous considérables au sein de la société
turque du fait de l’origine arménienne d’un pan important de la
société turque. Cela porterait un coup dur à l’idéologie de la race
turque, surtout s’il faudra dévoiler les archives ottomanes. Il ne
faut pas se leurrer, les gouvernements turcs ne reconnaîtront pas le
génocide arménien de sitôt. Le gouvernement actuel a déjà entamé une
vaste campagne de dénigrement à l’approche du centenaire du génocide
(24 avril 2015). Il contacte même des écrivains arméniens « modérés »
pour écrire des articles minimisant le génocide. Grce à ses puissants
lobbies, il fait pression tous azimuts pour que le génocide ne soit
pas célébré dans certains pays allant même jusqu’à les menacer de
sanctions économiques. À l’intérieur, il n’hésite pas à abuser de
l’article 301 de son code pénal pour incriminer les briseurs du tabou.
Ainsi, en juillet 2012, il instruit un procès contre l’éditeur Rajip
Zarakolu, premier Turc à avoir osé défier le tabou arménien dans son
pays en publiant des livres sur le génocide arménien. Taner Akçam,
sociologue et historien turc, professeur au Centre d’études de
l’Holocauste et des génocides à l’Université Clarke (Minnesota) aux
États-Unis, a écrit un livre sur le génocide qui lui a valu de
nombreuses menaces en Turquie. Selon lui, la négation du génocide est
une industrie en Turquie. Les actes négationnistes des Turcs ne
s’arrêteront donc pas de sitôt. Que peut-on donc attendre d’un pays
qui fait des mains et des pieds pour étouffer une tranche de son passé
?

samedi 27 avril 2013,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

http://www.lorientlejour.com/article/811523/pourquoi-le-negationnisme-.html

Le 98e anniversaire du génocide arménien commémoré à Tbilissi

GENOCIDE ARMENIEN
Le 98e anniversaire du génocide arménien commémoré à Tbilissi (Géorgie)

Les Arméniens de Tbilissi (Géorgie) ont commémoré le 98e anniversaire
du génocide arménien par une série de manifestations. Le matin du 24
avril une messe de requiem à l’église Sainte Etchmiadzine de Havlabar
(quartier arménien de la capitale géorgienne) à la mémoire des
victimes du génocide arménien. Puis les manifestants rassemblés près
de l’église arménienne se dirigèrent vers le panthéon arménien de
Khodjivank. De nombreuses personnalités étaient présentes à la
cérémonie. Parmi ces dernières Hovhannés Manoukian l’Ambassadeur
d’Arménie à Tbilissi, l’archevêque Vazken Mirzakhanian représentant de
l’Eglise arménienne de Géorgie, le conseiller à la présidence
géorgienne Van Baybourdian, le représentant des Droits de l’homme au
Parlement géorgien, Ketvan Pokhadzé. Après les discours, les
personnalités et le public se recueillit devant le khatchkar dédié aux
victimes du génocide de 1915 en y déposant des fleurs.

A l’appel de l’association « Communauté arménienne de Géorgie », une
manifestation s’est déroulée devant l’Ambassade de Turquie à Tbilissi.
Les manifestants portaient des drapeaux de l’Arménie et de la Géorgie.
Aux centaines de manifestants Arméniens s’étaient joints des Géorgiens
ainsi que des membres des communautés kurdes et assyriennes.

Krikor Amirzayan

samedi 27 avril 2013,
Krikor Amirzayan ©armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=89186

Ankara: Turkey regrets over Obama’s statement on 1915 incidents

Turkish Press
April 25 2013

Turkey regrets over Obama’s statement on 1915 incidents

Foreign Ministry said it deeply regretted over statements of Obama
made on April 24.

ANKARA – Turkey regretted over US President Barack Obama`s April 24
statement regarding 1915 incidents.

Turkish Foreign Ministry stated that it regarded the statement, which
distorted the historical facts, as problematic in every aspect and
deeply regretted it.

The Ministry on Wednesday said that unfortunately US President Obama
was demonstrated this year once again a one-sided approach which
reflected the Armenian views regarding the dispute between Turks and
Armenians on the painful part of their common history.

It was added, “We regard this statement, which distorts the historical
facts, as problematic in every aspect and deeply regret it. Issued
under the influence of domestic political considerations and
interpreting controversial historical events on the basis of one-sided
information and with a selective sense of justice, such statements
damage both Turkish-American relations, and also render it more
difficult for Turks and Armenians to reach a just memory.”

“Our expectation from an important ally of Turkey such as the US is
not to further deepen the problem, but to provide constructive
contributions for its resolution, and to encourage the Armenian side,
which avoids objective and scientific research of the issue, to be
more realistic and conciliatory,” said the statement.

The statement underlined that the pain experienced during the World
War I was a shared one and the memory of that period was as sensitive
for the Turkish people as it was for the Armenians.

“Despite the prejudiced attempts to hinder a correct understanding of
history, Turkey approaches the issue with self-confidence and an
open-mind, and wants the truth to be investigated in all its aspects,”
noted the statement.

Published: 4/24/2013

http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=384434

I dreamed about living in Armenia but they never invited – interview

I dreamed about living in Armenia but they never invited – interview
of soprano Maria Guleghina

APRIL 27, 00:01

By Marina Adulyan

There is no need to introduce Maria Guleghina to opera lovers. Her
powerful soprano thrills the audience. Fans and critics describe
Guleghina as `Russian soprano with Verdi flowing through her veins’
and `Vocal Miracle’. She is especially famous for her interpretation
of the title role in Tosca. In addition, her repertoire includes
leading roles in the operas Aida, Norma, Fedora, Turandot, Violetta in
La Traviata and others. The singer has performed solo concerts around
the world, including that at La Scala, Gran Teatre del Liceu, Lille,
Sao Paolo, in Moscow, Rome and other cities. She performed with
world’s leading singers, including Luciano Pavarotti and Placido
Domingo. But few know that she has Armenian roots.

What was little Masha dreaming about when she went to bed as a child?
Were you dreaming about the stage, fame and popularity?

They wanted to name me Mariam to honor my grandmother, but since we
lived in Odessa, my mom chose the name Marina, and then it was
recorded as international Maria in my passport. But it is never used
as Masha. Maria is the name for the posters, but in real life I’m
Marina. As for dreams, they were different. I have never thought about
fame as it is. I just wanted to sing, to dance, to be an artist. All
girls want it in their childhood.

You are called `prima donna’. Do you consider yourself `prima donna’?

All female opera singers are called so, there is nothing wrong with
that. This status gives you the exclusive right to work hard and this
must never be visible to the public. That’s it. And you have to
remember `not to forget to go out of the role, going out of the
theater.’

Your voice makes the walls shake…

Yes, it does …

They say the voice is `divine mystery’. Did you open the mystery?

Hard Work, Patience, Humility, and once again work – all this is the
key to successful devotion.

Your singing goes deep into heart, it is impossible to listen without
tears. What music can evoke your feelings?
There are many works which can evoke my emotions. I have recently sung
wartime songs. You cannot imagine how hard it was, I just began
singing and my eyes rained tears. It happens when I am singing `Ave
Maria’ by Caccini, or `Krunk’ by Komitas.

Have you achieved everything you wanted? Do you have a dream that has
not come true?

To fly a plane. I have ridden a yacht, stroked tigers, I have ridden
an elephant and camel. I am good at horse riding, I took the lessons.
But the most important and significant in my life are two beautiful
kids! My royal couple – a daughter and my little son.

Having spent many efforts to climb to the top, which seemed
unachievable, what do you think is more important – a career or
personal life, the family?

You know, careers differ. If we are talking about a saleswoman who
spent twenty years of her life to become a manager, in this case, of
course, the family is more important. In my life it’s not even a
career, it is service.

According to Armenian tradition, I got married at 18. I had been
engaged to be married and everything was as it should be, but my
mother-in-law opposed my decision to enter the conservatory and
strongly struggled for our breakup. Later it happened. According to
her `daughter-in-law concept’, a singer could not be a good wife for
her son. I took my little daughter and at 20 was an adult with a
child. So, I had to survive. I had to bring up a daughter and earn
living. I became the head of the family. My daughter, my mother, and
my husband who has never worked. At that time, for me, as an Armenian
woman, it was shameful not to be married having a baby. He learnt to
sing, but never managed to.

Please, tell about your family.

I have great parents! They were amazing but so different. My mother
was a professor of microbiology. She was soft, kind and calm. My dad
worked for an enterprise. No one would ever say he had bad eyesight.
He was always handsome and smart, life of the party.

What family traditions do you have?

Now I have traditions of my own family, but some were preserved from
my parents. We celebrate all the feasts, according to the Gregorian
calendar. We always mark Remembrance Day on April 24. My husband’s
parents both came from the orphanage. They lost their parents in
infancy. They were from Kars and my parents from Van, but then settled
in Akhaltsikhe. Some members of the family managed to go to France,
but I have never heard from them. Hospitality is my thing. I like
cooking and guests. We are singing songs together. A new tradition is
to pick mushrooms, there are many white mushrooms in Luxembourg woods.

You mentioned that opera singer Gohar Gasparyan, Charles Aznavour and
Cher have influenced you.

My dad had all records of these musicians. And when I told him that I
wanted to be a singer, he said I had to sing as Gohar Gasparyan, or do
nothing. By the way, I loved Lusine Zakarian. I heard her voice at a
liturgy in Etchmiadzin. She was also a native of Akhaltsikhe. They
sent me a book about the Armenians of Akhaltsikhe, it was nice that
she was there, but I was not forgotten, too. Thank you!

What books did parents read you in your childhood?

Different books. My dad did not read but listened to the recordings.
There were music libraries. I grew up listening to all these books
about war, about Marshal Zhukov, Baghramyan. The books `Wounds of
Armenia’, `The Forty Days of Musa Dagh’ and everything about
Sardarabad – all this I knew from my early childhood.

Interestingly, you chose Armenian men. Is it because of your Armenian roots?

Probably it happens because a girl always wants her husband to remind
of her father. My husband is very similar, tall and handsome. He works
at the Olympic Committee, he is a Greco-Roman wrestling coach.

I think now my parents are happy for me, because I can say he is my
only one and a real husband. We got married in the Armenian Church in
New York. Guests included Placido Domingo, Lucky Roosevelt, Martina
Arroyo, my colleagues from the theater. It was a very old rite, we
wore crowns. I was crying. The entire service was in Armenian, and we
swore the oath in our native language. This church was built by
Calouste Gulbenkian. I want to thank him for the church, and for a
stunning concert venue in Lisbon, where I sang a lot. To honor him, I
finished all the concerts singing `Krunk’ a capella. During our
wedding at St Regis there was national music as well, and bride was
dancing an Armenian dance.

Tell me why people living in Armenia know almost nothing about you?

Most likely because I changed my last name when I was young. I am very
sorry, but after the first divorce, I had to return my father’s name.
My father’s name is very hard to pronounce (Meytardzhyan) and I had
heard so much of improper pronunciation that I just changed it to
other one, although it was not dear to me.

After graduating from the conservatory, I was dreaming about singing
in Yerevan. Lisician and Dolukhanova strongly supported me, but Mr.
Chekijian, who was heading Armenian National Academic Theatre of Opera
and Ballet, said `they had too many sopranos.’ Then, I won the
competition. When I received the first prize, it was a triumph for
Armenia. I could not walk down the street. Everyone wanted to give me
a lift and treat me. I was expecting they would offer me a job in the
theater, but I got nothing except for empty words. Of course, at that
time, I dreamed of living in Armenia. But I have a different destiny,
and now I live in Luxembourg, Moscow, and wherever I sing. If they
invite me, I will come. Right now I have an invitation to sing at the
opening of the Armenian Church, but it is constantly postponed, so I
am not sure that I will be able to sing there.

You came to Armenia in 90s. It was a difficult time for the country.
What made you come back home during this difficult period of time?

I came to lift the spirit, to show that until the nation is interested
in culture, everything can be put right!

Do you think people appreciated it?

If you do something, do not wait for the praise and gratitude. I just
came and sang. After the Spitak earthquake I wanted to adopt children.
I already had a nearly 10- year-old daughter and I thought about two
little boys. I was surprised and happy to know that almost all the
kids were taken by relatives of their families. Well done, Armenians!
I was not given a child. Although I am Armenian, I am a
Russian-speaking person. I have forgotten Armenian and Georgian. I
used to speak to my dad and grandmother. My granny did not speak
Russian, and coming for the holidays, I had to understand what she
says.

Do you plan to visit Armenia?

I will be pleased to include it in my plans!

NEWS.am STYLE

http://style.news.am/eng/news/4528/i-dreamed-about-living-in-armenia-but-they-never-invitedinterview-of-soprano-maria-guleghina.html

Prosperous Armenia seeking for 5 ministerial seats?

Prosperous Armenia seeking for 5 ministerial seats?

April 26, 2013 – 18:43 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Prosperous Armenia leader Gagik Tsarulyan didn’t
meet Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan, with no ministerial seats
discussed, party spokesman Tigran Urikhanyan said.

In conversation with a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter, the ruling Republican
Party of Armenia (RPA) spokesman Eduard Sharmazanov assured that no
discussions took place with Prosperous Armenia.

Meanwhile, Haykakan Zhamanak paper reported that a meeting between
Tigran Sargsyan and Gagik Tsarulyan took place last week, with
Prosperous Armenia’s executive body favoring formation of a coalition
and RPA’s large part against the idea. Moreover, Prosperous Armenia is
rumored to seek for 5 ministerial seats in exchange for entering the
coalition, with the ruling authorities agreeing to only 4 of them.

Wolves in Sheep Clothes: Armenian pasture rental to potential armed

Wolves in Sheep Clothes: Armenian pasture rental to potential armed
Azeri-Iranians raises concern among nationalists

NEWS | 26.04.13 | 15:50

NAZIK ARMENAKYAN
ArmeniaNow

By SIRANUYSH GEVORGYAN
ArmeniaNow reporter

Another wave of clamor is raised over the controversial lease of
fallow grazing lands in Armenia’s strategically important northern
gate, the highlands of Syunik province, to Iranian shepherds.

A number of news outlets in Armenia, with a reference to Fars Iranian
news agency, have published a statement by one of Iran’s Eastern
Atropatene province officials, claiming that by June, 10,000 sheep
will be transferred to pastures in Syunik for a six-month term.

Syunik local administration body has refuted that information as `untrue’.

The Armenian side recently has been forced to periodically refute
claims related to the grazing leases coming from Iranians, however
their denials no longer sound trustworthy.

The Ecolur environmental NGO declassified two documents on February 1,
one of which is titled `Memorandum of understanding between Iran’s
Eastern Atropatene province and RA Syunik province’. The NGO
especially highlights Point 3 in this document signed by the governors
of Syunik and Eastern Atropatene on July, 2012: `The Iranian side has
expressed its willingness to use the pastures and agricultural farming
lands.’ The second document was signed on January 15, 2013, during the
Armenian delegation’s visit to the Eastern Atropatene and is called an
Agreement. In particular, it becomes clear that Iranians want to rent
50,000 hectares of grazing land for the minimum of 10 years and pay
$25 per hectare of land per month. The NGO draws a conclusion that
`the process has started, and the plan is to make it happen on a local
level to avoid undesirable publicity’. The Armenian government back
then stated that `no agreement implying any legal consequences’ has
been signed between Iran’s Eastern Atropatene and Armenia’s Syunik
provinces.

Those concerned over the possible lease of pastures point out two
major objections – potential overgrazing and ecology, and national
security issues. Turkish-speaking ethnic Azeris populate this Iranian
state. This fact considered, it is mostly nationalist structures
speaking against the grazing leases. For example, Armenian Aryan Order
and Armenian Nationalists’ Union (ANU) have stated that the Armenian
authorities should not allow Syunik lands `to be voluntarily or
involuntarily handed to Turkish-Azeri disposal’.

Members of a Facebook group `NO to Syunik Sale’ are preparing an open
letter to the president and the prime-minister of Armenia demanding
clear explanation to the grazing leases.

It is noteworthy that an English-language Russian Moscow Times
periodical made a reference to Syunik pastures. The author of the
article writes: `The Iranian sheep deal could come with as many as
10,000 ethnic Azeri shepherds, their families, and their watchdogs.
But there is another wrinkle: Over the past 20 years, the withdrawal
of Armenian shepherds from the mountain pastures has allowed the
nation’s wolf population to surge. Armenian authorities now pay a $275
bounty for each wolf shot. So it stands to reason that Iranian
shepherds would carry rifles to protect their flocks from wolves and
other predators. In a nutshell, Armenians say, the Iranian sheep deal
would mean several thousand ethnic Azeri men, most of whom are armed
with rifles, infiltrating into a strategic area.’

Armenian society is getting rid of excessively politicized state

Armenian society is getting rid of excessively politicized state – architect

April 26, 2013 | 14:31

YEREVAN. – The Armenian body politic has begun to keep away from the
excessively politicized state. Architect Levon Igityan, who is
included in the ruling Republican Party list for the forthcoming
capital city Yerevan Council election, stated this.

`Now, our citizens are inclined toward real actions, and the
assessments are made according to the work [that is done],’ Igityan
said.

In his words, what is important for him is to bring benefit to his
hometown, and it does not matter with which political party.

`Had I received an offer from another party, I would have joined its
list to work for the wellbeing of the city,’ Levon Igityan added.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Political Ways of Containment of War Have Been Exausted

Political Ways of Containment of War Have Been Exausted

Who will get the weapon?

A number of European states have a decision on supply of weapons to
the South Caucasian states, which has not only an economic but also
political importance for the relevant companies.

In the current situation when Russia, Israel, Turkey and other states
supply weapon to the countries of our region in abundance, it seems
meaningless to pretend that there is no weapon race and the treaty on
conventional weapons is actual.

Currently the international community has signed to the recognition
that political ways of containing war in the region have been
exhausted though they have never been effective. What will change in
regard to this decision?

Hardly anything will change in Georgia and Azerbaijan. They received
enough supplies of weapon, notably Georgia for political and
Azerbaijan for financial reasons.

Armenia is in a more miserable situation because apart from
cooperation with Russia it feels pressure as Russia supplies weapon to
Azerbaijan. (None of the Armenian authors, not even retired generals
is able to find a justification for most countries of Europe.)

At the same time, hopes occur that now not only Russia but also some
European states, notably France, Germany, Poland and Greece, will
offer supply of weapon to Armenia at more or less reasonable and
acceptable conditions.

Now there is reason to state it with confidence. Although the
Euro-Atlantic community has positive expectations from the problems
that occurred in the Armenian-Russian relations, it is not interested
in weakening of Armenia.

Politicians and policy-makers of the Western community think that
Armenia has matured for accelerated integration with NATO and the
European Union. It should be taken into account that such a `package’
decision could not be taken in isolation from one another because
almost all of these countries are NATO members (or cooperate closely
with the alliance.)

At the same time, it is impossible to rely on political `automatics’
that the West will lead Armenia to prosperous future holding by the
hand without active initiatives from the other side. Initiatives from
new partners are the most valuable political resource for NATO and the
EU in Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean.

Of course, time will come when the West will try to `squeeze’
something from Armenia in regard to its relations with Turkey and
Azerbaijan, and the closest partner of these countries, the United
Kingdom, is the most active in this direction. However, no doubt these
attempts will have a PR nature and will be easily neutralized.

The policy aimed at weakening Armenia cannot have geopolitical grounds
and without a geopolitical rationale it will work towards weakening
the security of the West. It is time that Armenia move from `training
and education’ to a more serious talk with NATO. They will not demand
more from us than from others while our position may be more secure
and preferable. It could be advisable for Armenian officers to study
not only English but also French and German, as well as Polish. They
are wonderful languages, and great literature has been written in
these languages.

Igor Muradyan
11:41 26/04/2013
Story from Lragir.am News:

http://www.lragir.am/index.php/eng/0/comments/view/29730