Tbilisi: Relations Between Armenia-Azerbaijan-Turkey Discussed In Tb

RELATIONS BETWEEN ARMENIA-AZERBAIJAN-TURKEY DISCUSSED IN TBILISI
By Ana Robakidze

The Messenger, Georgia
May 2 2013

The regulation of relations between Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey
were discussed during the 3rd annual NATO Parliamentary Assembly’s
83rd Rose-Roth seminar in the capital Tbilisi. Representatives of
the three countries addressed the participants and provided their
opinions on the regional conflict.

It is obvious for all parties that conflict resolution will require
a very long time and huge efforts, as none of the sides seem to be
ready to give up their positions.

Armenian political analyst, Alexander Iskanderian, fears that despite
the desire of the Armenian side to settle relations with Turkey,
the process of the conflict resolution is frozen, for what official
Ankara has to be blamed as the expert said at the seminar. According
to Iskanderian, the situation is difficult, as the Kharabakh conflict
remains unsolved and meanwhile Turkey is actively lobbing in support
of Azerbaijan. The expert says currently it is impossible to even speak
about the ways of stabilizing the relations between Armenia and Turkey.

Representative of Azerbaijan, Fariz Ismailzade does not deny that
Turkey and Azerbaijan will remain partner countries. Ismailzade said
in his speech at the seminar that Turkey played a huge role in the
development of his country, but at present these two countries are
equal partners. Ismailzade is concerned about the Kharabakh conflict,
he said the after the failure of the Kazan meeting, the process is
“closed” and it will be impossible to solve the conflict until the
status of Kharabakh is resolved.

Representative of Turkey, Dr. Mustafa Aydin, assured the participants
of the Rose-Roth seminar that his country is greatly interested in the
Caucasus region and will try to create a zone of economic stability
around its borders. However, due to the fact that the Armenian side
closed the border with Turkey, it is difficult to promote negotiations
between these two countries, Aydin said in his speech.

Despite principally different opinions on the ways of conflict
settlement, all participants of the seminar agreed that there is no
way to solve the problem and stabilize the relations between Armenia,
Azerbaijan and Turkey without the participation of international
organizations and their missions.

President of NATO Parliamentary Assembly Hugh Bayley closed the
seminar with his final speech, summarizing the results of the three-day
event. It is nice to see that both the opposition and the government
of the country keep the same foreign course and strive to achieve
integration with Euro-Atlantic structures, Bayley said.

After closing the official part of the seminar, cultural events were
arranged for the participants.

http://www.messenger.com.ge/issues/2852_may_2_2013/2852_ani.html

Armenian Embassy To Open In Stockholm

ARMENIAN EMBASSY TO OPEN IN STOCKHOLM

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
May 2 2013

Today the Armenian government adopted a decision to allocate AMD
168 million to the Armenian Foreign Ministry for opening an embassy
in Sweden.

“Among the countries of the South Caucasus, as well as the Eastern
Partnership countries, Armenia is the only one that does not have an
embassy in Stockholm. The opening of an Armenian Embassy in Stockholm
can be a signal for Sweden to open an embassy in Armenia,” RIA News
quotes the government decision.

Deputy Foreign Minister Shavarsh Kocharyan noted at a sitting on
Thursday 2 May that Armenia established diplomatic relations with
Sweden in 1992.

“Sweden is the only Scandinavian country to have recognized the
Genocide. The opening of an embassy has long been on the agenda,”
the official said..

Capturing The Armenian Experience: Novelist, Poet Nancy Kricorian

CAPTURING THE ARMENIAN EXPERIENCE: NOVELIST, POET NANCY KRICORIAN

Nancy Kricorian
By Gabriella Gage

Mirror-Spectator Staff

WATERTOWN – For poet and novelist Nancy Kricorian, writing has always
been an integral part of her life. “I started writing poems as soon
as I began writing sentences in the first grade. By the time I was
in the third grade, my poems were hanging on the classroom bulletin
board, which at the time felt to me like being a published poet,”
said Kricorian.

Growing up in Watertown’s burgeoning Armenian community, Kricorian
served as the Watertown High School literary magazine editor. While she
would later explore the history and heritage of her Armenian family,
like some of the characters in her novel, there were times when her own
relationship with her Armenian identity was complicated, even strained.

“I desperately wanted to be American, particularly in middle school
when I witnessed the very rough treatment meted out to ‘off the boat’
Armenian kids from Beirut. A few times I was called a ‘camel driver’
and ‘Armo rugbeater,’ which I found painful. When I was in high school,
I desperately wanted out of East Watertown, but once I was had left,
I became almost nostalgic for the community I had grown up in.”

Kricorian would come to realize that her heritage and its history were
just as integral to her life as the pen and paper. “In my writing,
my imagination pulls me inexorably back to the Armenian community,”
said Kricorian.

Kricorian continued to write poetry and studied comparative literature
at Dartmouth College. She was awarded a Dartmouth Senior Fellowship in
poetry for her manuscript, Asking Everything, or Off Balance in Red
Tutu. As an MFA student at Columbia University, she began publishing
her poems in literary journals.

After the death of her grandmother, Kricorian transitioned to
longer prose, shifting her focus from poetry to fiction, with her
grandmother’s life serving as the inspiration for a series of short
stories. These stories eventually evolved into her first novel,
Zabelle – a fictionalized account of her grandmother’s experiences
as a Genocide survivor and young immigrant to the US. In the novel,
protagonist Zabelle Chahasbanian faces the challenges of an arranged
marriage, assimilation and discovering a new life in Watertown, Mass.

– far away from her ancestral home.

In her second novel, Dreams of Bread and Fire, Kricorian continued her
own exploration of the post-Genocide Diaspora experience by tackling
the issues that face women of her own generation who grew up in the
shadow of the atrocities of the Genocide. The book’s protagonist
witnesses the affects it had on the older generations and goes on
her own journey of discovery of these tragic events.

With each novel, Kricorian has explored a new aspect of Armenian
identity and the relationship between history and memory, as well
as revisited themes from previous her works. “I grew up in the
Armenian community Watertown, and since I left to make my way in the
broader world, the history of the Armenian people, particularly the
post-Genocide Diaspora experience, has fascinated me,” said Kricorian.

Kricorian’s latest book, All the Light There Was, is a coming-of-age
story of an Armenian family living in Paris during the Nazi Occupation
and is centered around a teenage girl, Maral. “All the Light There Was
required a vast amount of research, much more than I had done for the
first two books, which were more closely based on family history. I
loved the research, especially interviewing Armenians in their 70s, 80s
and 90s who had lived in Paris during the war,” Kricorian explained.

As Kricorian conducted historical research, she said she “started
wondering what it must have been like for Genocide survivors who had
made their way to France and had rebuilt their lives and communities
to see the Nazis marching into Paris. I didn’t want to write a novel
about extreme heroics, but rather hoped to write about an ordinary
Armenian family’s experience.”

Kricorian says she will continue to explore these themes in future
works. “The book I am currently researching, which will be an Armenian
family in Bourj Hammoud, Lebanon, that lives five years of the Civil
War before immigrating to the States. It will also be told from a
woman’s point of view.”

Kricorian has received several awards for both her poetry and
critically-acclaimed novels, including the Anahid Literary Award from
Columbia University.

In addition to her creative explorations of identity, Kricorian has
taken on the role of activist and social justice advocate. For 10
years, Kricorian has served on the national staff of CODEPINK, the
women-initiated grassroots peace and social justice movement.

Kricorian, explaining her initial involvement, said, “I joined in
March 2003 weeks before the launch of the Iraq War, which we hoped
to avert. I was the campaign manger for Listen Hillary (an effort to
push Senator and then Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton into more
progressive stands on war and national security.”

“My commitment to dignity, equality and justice for all people inspires
the grassroots political work that I do. It is my hope that it suffuses
my writing as well. My goal in both is to amplify the voices of women
and to promote the humane in the human,” said Kricorian.

Kricorian currently resides in New York City with her husband, James
Schamus, CEO of Focus Features. Together they have two children
and two dogs. In her spare time, Kricorian enjoys baking, knitting,
traveling and bird-watching.

But even during “spare time,” a writer can find inspiration. “I’m
currently taking an Audubon Society bird-watching class that meets in
Central Park. This is partly out of interest and partly as research for
my new novel in which birds will be a central theme,” said Kricorian.

Nagorno-Karabakh: Conceptual Approaches To The Prospects Of The Conf

NAGORNO-KARABAKH: CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO THE PROSPECTS OF THE CONFLICT SETTLEMENT

02.05.2013

Sergei Minasyan

Ph.D. in History, Head of the Department of the Political Studies at
the Caucasus Institute As it is known, today the Nagorno-Karabakh
Republic is not fully involved in the negotiation process under
the auspices of the OSCE Minsk Group. The stance of Stepanakert is
presented in the international arena by Armenia which states that
at this stage it abstains from the recognition of the NKR. Armenia
considers the fact of non-recognition on its behalf as a compromise
directed to non-admission of escalation of the conflict and preserving
of the negotiation process.

At the same time it should be underlined that both co-chairmen
and official Yerevan constantly state that Stepanakert will join
the negotiations when it is time for it. In fact, point at issue is
that in case if the guiding principles of the conflict settlement are
accepted and the negotiation process obtains real shapes, realization
of long-term peace will be impossible without involvement in the
process of Nagorno-Karabakh – the main party to the conflict.

Currently, when Armenia and Azerbaijan with the help of the mediators
simply sound out each other’s positions, probably, Stepanakert does not
have serious reasons of being involved in this process and undertaking
additional obligations.

Correspondingly, Nagorno-Karabakh is currently in the position of
the external observer of the conflict settlement process in which his
fate is decided and in which he paradoxically (as the main interested
party to the conflict) is not involved. At the same time, not being
a full-fledged negotiating party, official Stepanakert has elaborated
rather multi-level, but at the same time rather harmonious and logical
approaches to the essence and possible goals of the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict settlement.

The stance of Nagorno-Karabakh, first of all, is based on its idea of
legitimacy and consistency of its struggle for independence by the
analogy with many cases from world practice such as Kosovo, North
Cyprus, Eritrea, East Timor, South Sudan, etc. At the same time in
Karabakh they insist on not applying the principle of inviolability of
borders, because here we speak about the borders set by the arbitrary
rule of Stalin and which are the relics of the Soviet regime. In the
opinion of the people of Karabakh two other principles of international
law are decisive – the right of the nations to self-determination
and non-use of force in resolution of the international controversies
and conflicts.

The Karabakh elite says that there is no example in the history when
the nation which won the war for independence and which have been
successfully building its statehood for two decades, voluntarily
renounced from its achievements. Correspondingly the negotiations on
the settlement of the conflict must be held with the participation of
official Stepanakert, because the accords reached without its agreement
cannot be carried out anyway. That is the reason why the NKR insists
on recognition of Nagorno-Karabakh’s right on participation in the
negotiation process. Stirring up of the problem of the unrecognized
or de-facto states in the world politics for recent two decades have
caused the crisis of international law system and granted unrecognized
countries an opportunity to reason their stance in the legal terrain.

>From the point of view of traditional international law the issue
of unrecognized states has essential aspect which is inseparable from
the historical context. Primarily, the states are the subjects of the
international law but big historical events, which cause creation
of “new” states and ruin of “old” ones, are occurring outside the
legal terrain and are external in regard of them. That is why many
specialists on international law suppose that historical events
give birth to new legal order. The classic of the world political
science Raymond Aron believed that due to the reason that the birth
and collapse of the states was not a metalegal (transitional-legal)
process and recognition of the state on behalf of the others was rather
political than a legal act or it at least did not form the elements
of law, so the “legal existence of a new state depends rather on
objective fulfillment of some conditions prescribed by international
law to the state than on its recognition by other states”.

Trying to convince international community that the NKR has all the
main attributes of the state, the authorities of Nagorno-Karabakh
also pay attention to the formation of the government institutions
in the NKR based on the free democratic elections which differ from
the domestic political reality existing in the neighboring Azerbaijan.

As for the diplomatic efforts and negotiation process, the reality
formed in the result of the negotiations, which have lasted for recent
20 years, is that any option of returning Karabakh to Azerbaijan is not
even discussed. In case of any of the options of peaceful settlement
of the conflict discussed today (whether these are Madrid principles
or other proposals made by the mediators) Azerbaijan theoretically
can count on reclaiming of some territories but it have to agree that
Nagorno-Karabakh, at least within the administrative borders of the
Soviet period and with the ground corridor connecting it with Armenia,
will never be returned under its jurisdiction. This is the content
of the proposals placed on the OSCE Minsk Group table.

The key element of the Madrid Principles is the referendum which
plays a role of the mechanism of international political and legal
legitimization of separation of Karabakh from Azerbaijan.

>From the point of view of Nagorno-Karabakh Kosovo precedent and
recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia by Russia had good effect on
its positions. And this is not only in the aspect of drawing possible
parallels with Karabakh in legal and political plains but also in
the aspect of an increased legitimacy of creation of new states in
the perception of the international community and leading powers.

At the same time most part of the public and political elites
in Armenia and Karabakh consider that the existence of de-facto
independent Nagorno-Karabakh Republic strengthens positions of the
Armenian parties, especially taking into consideration the world
tendency of sovereignization of some unrecognized states and the
so-called “Kosovo precedent”. In their opinion every day of in
fact independent existence of Nagorno-Karabakh only strengthen the
sovereignty and inevitability of a state building process.

The fact that the officials in Azerbaijan constantly tend to speed up
the Karabakh process and blame Armenia of slowing it down, most vividly
illustrates on whose side the time is in the Karabakh conflict. In
fact, a syndrome of “sand-glass” begins to appear in Azerbaijan when
every additional day of Karabakh loss strengthens the filling of its
permanent loss among the leadership of Azerbaijan. This feeling is
redoubled by almost everyday but ineffective bellicose statements
which only worsen pessimistic mood of the Azerbaijani society in the
issue of reclaiming Karabakh “by any means”.

In the context of negotiations the key issue for Nagorno-Karabakh is
the guarantee of security of its population. Against the background
of combat actions of the first half of the 1990s and constant
threat sounded by Baku, before making compromises to Azerbaijan
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic wants to have real guarantees of security,
which will be more efficient (or at least equal) to the ones it has
today. Current guarantees of security of Karabakh are fortified and
convenient for defense borders, availability of transport corridor
connecting Karabakh and Armenia as well as buffering zone around the
administrative borders of the Soviet period Karabakh. And the line
of contact between the Karabakh and Azerbaijani armies is restricted
by the Mrav range in the north and Iranian border in the south. Thus
the front line is shortened several times, which allows Karabakh army
to easier resist to bigger Azerbaijani army.

The key element in the stance of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic in
regard to the negotiation process is based on the fact that withdrawal
of Karabakh army units at least from one region along the perimeter
of Nagorno-Karabakh borders will weaken the defense line and, in
the absence of final peace agreement, will increase a possibility of
resumption of combat actions, thus enhancing temptation of Azerbaijan
to have a military revanche on more favourable terms. Today the
fortified border line is the best guarantee of non-resumption of
combat actions.

Meanwhile, only recognition of independence of Nagorno-Karabakh
Republic (or similar status) by Baku with political and legal mechanism
of achieving it, prescribed in advance (e.g. by means of additional
plebiscite under the supervision of international mediators and
further recognition by international community and Azerbaijan),
is considered equal substitution to the current guarantees.

Moreover, Nagorno-Karabakh has been tending recently to go beyond
international isolation and take part in the regional projects. In
fact, isolation of Karabakh from international community only moves
away the prospect of reconciliation with Azerbaijan, thus forming
among the people of Karabakh the syndrome of “besieged fortress”
and unpreparedness for the compromise, which will be getting even
deeper in the future.

Threats of official Baku to use force against civilian planes in case
of opening of a new airport in Stepanakert, much talked-of incidents
with Ramil Safarov and Aikram Airisli enroot in the Karabakh society
and political elite of the NKR doubts concerning the possibility
of compromises with Azerbaijan at current stage of development of
the conflict.

“Globus” analytical journal, #4, 2013

Return Another materials of author “ARMENIZATION” OF THE DOMESTIC
POLITICAL LIFE IN GEORGIA?[28.03.2013] ON THE ROLE OF THE ENERGY
FACTOR IN THE KARABAKH CONFLICT: NEW RE-FRAMING?[17.12.2012]
IRANIAN CRISIS AND “IMMEDIATE” DETERRENCE IN THE KARABAKH
CONFLICT[16.10.2012] PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS: GEORGIA AHEAD OF THE
CONTROVERSIAL EVENT[24.09.2012] THE DYNAMICS AND TENDENCY OF THE
RELATIONS BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND THE US: CONCEPTUAL
ANALYSIS [01.09.2011] POSSIBILITIES OF INTERNATIONAL PEACEKEEPING IN
NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT: MYTHS AND REALITIES[14.02.2011] ARMENIAN –
GEORGIAN RELATIONS AFTER “FIVE DAYS” WAR[15.10.2009] ARMENIA-TURKEY:
NEW POLITICAL PHASE? [14.05.2009] SPECIAL PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS ON
JANUARY 5, 2008 IN GEORGIA: A VIEW FROM JAVAKHQ[07.02.2008]

http://www.noravank.am/eng/articles/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=7062

UK Armenians Commemorate Genocide (Photos)

UK ARMENIANS COMMEMORATE GENOCIDE (PHOTOS)

By Raffi Youredjian

Photos by Raffi Youredjian

LONDON, UK-On Sat., April 20, approximately 1,500 people, led by the
Homenetmen Scouts, members of the Armenian Community and Church Council
(ACCC) and the Campaign for Recognition of the Armenian Genocide
(CRAG), marched through the streets of London, moving from Oxford
to Regent Street, Haymarket, Trafalgar Square, and Whitehall before
arriving at the Cenotaph Memorial. Official representatives, including
Ara Margarian, councilor, Embassy of the Republic of Armenia; Ara
Palamoudian, chairman of the ACCC; and Bishop Vahan Hovhanessian of the
Diocese of the Armenian Church of Great Britain, placed wreaths at the
Cenotaph in memory of the victims of the Armenian Genocide. Following
the signing of the Armenian National Anthem, representatives of the
Armenian community in Great Britain continued to 10 Downing Street,
where they handed a petition letter to the prime minister’s office.

http://www.armenianweekly.com/2013/05/02/uk-armenians-commemorate-genocide-photos/

Do Not Try To Embroil Us In Quarrel With ANC And ARF – Naira Zohraby

DO NOT TRY TO EMBROIL US IN QUARREL WITH ANC AND ARF – NAIRA ZOHRABYAN

May 03, 2013 | 14:34

YEREVAN. – Prosperous Armenia member Naira Zohrabyan called on
reporters not to try to embroil them in a quarrel with the Armenian
National Congress (ANC) and ARF Dashnaktsutyun.

Calling speculations “ungrounded”, she said they are ready to cooperate
with the ANC and ARF.

“We have a number of reservations in respect of Heritage, since the
political agenda of the party is still not clear. But, we do not refuse
to cooperate with them. We hope that the constructive statements made
earlier, will be backed up by actions,” she added.

Naira Zohrabian categorically dismissed rumors about handing in
vote bribes.

Six political parties and one bloc have submitted formal applications
to run in the Yerevan Council elections. The latter are slated for
May 5, and the participating political forces will vie for 65 Council
seats. The election campaign is coming to an end on May 3. The Yerevan
Council election will be held with proportional lists only.

These parties are Republican Party of Armenia, Prosperous Armenia,
Orinats Yerkir, Armenian National Congress, Arakelutyun, ARF
Dashnaktustyun and “Barev, Yerevan” bloc of parties

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

When Artsvik Minasyan Greeted, Where Was Raffi Hovannisian?

WHEN ARTSVIK MINASYAN GREETED, WHERE WAS RAFFI HOVANNISIAN?

2013-05-02 13:27:31

Member of ARF-D Supreme Body, deputy of the National Assembly of the
Republic of Armenia, who heads the list of ARF-D in the elections of
Yerevan Council of Elders, Armen Rustamyan today during a meeting
with reporters, referring to the process of the election campaign,
upcoming May 5 elections, said that the government is doing everything
possible to reduce the role of elections of yerevan Council of Elders.

According to Armen Rustamyan, in our country the electorate is formed
by kinship and personal relations, and the task of ARF-D is to prove
that the elections are of major political significance.

Armen Rustamyan is convinced that the Republican Party is making
every effort to avoid even one elected village head of another party,
to say nothing about the Mayor of Yerevan, as if the Republican Party
will go to such a concession, this one-man system will come to an end.

“Today, the situation in our country has changed. The time has come
when to buy a voice of people is not easy. People are so tired of all
this that they have nothing to lose. A one-way out in the country is
to achieve regime change”, Armen Rustamyan said.

During the conference, journalists asked Armen Rustamyan, if he does
not notice similarity between election campaigns of ARF-D and Raffi
Hovannisian, referring to welcoming citizens, to which he replied:
“Raffi did not start greeting. If you want to know first who began
to shake hands with the citizens was our Artsvik Minasyan, who in
2009 greeted everyone. ”

http://lurer.com/?p=97103&l=en

Government Nixes Opposition Lawmaker’s Bill Related To Offshore Mini

GOVERNMENT NIXES OPPOSITION LAWMAKER’S BILL RELATED TO OFFSHORE MINING COMPANIES

BUSINESS | 02.05.13 | 14:07

Photo:

The Armenian government on Thursday gave a negative conclusion to the
draft law “On the Regulation of Offshore-Registered Mining Industry
Companies” submitted by opposition lawmaker and former prime minister
Hrant Bagratyan.

The bill providing for exclusion of offshore-registered companies in
certain dealings with the mining industry of Armenia is designed by
its author as a means to tackle tax evasion in the sector.

According to the official website of the government, it was stressed
at the Cabinet session that the Armenian executive authorities, too,
are concerned over the risks of tax evasion in the sector, but they
find that the bill is legally controversial and its adoption will
not provide an opportunity to efficiently manage the risk.

At the same time, Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan emphasized: “The
government is of the opinion that offshore enterprises investing in
Armenia, engaged in the export of products from Armenia and their
sale must be under our strictest control, because we see serious
risks in it.”

http://www.armenianow.com/economy/business/45756/armenia_offshore_zones_government
www.gov.am

Yerevan Vote 2013: Opposition Groups See No Chance Of RPA Winning Su

YEREVAN VOTE 2013: OPPOSITION GROUPS SEE NO CHANCE OF RPA WINNING SUNDAY POLLS

POLITICS | 02.05.13 | 11:01

Photolure

By NAIRA HAYRUMYAN
ArmeniaNow correspondent

Major opposition forces participating in the May 5 elections to
Yerevan’s Council of Elders rule out the possibility of the current
ruling Republican Party of Armenia (RPA) and its mayor Taron Margaryan
retaining power in the Armenian capital.

Enlarge Photo

Enlarge Photo

Under the election law that pertains to the Yerevan municipal vote,
a political party, or a bloc of parties, that manages to receive more
than 40 percent of the vote will automatically have its top candidate
installed as mayor. If neither party or bloc can get that majority, the
decision will be collectively upon the newly elected Council of Elders.

Earlier this week the opposition Armenian National Congress Party (ANC)
turned to the Prosecutor-General’s Office, asking it to inquire into
the legality of the wealth officially declared by 35-year-old mayor
Margaryan and worth several million dollars. The ANC wants prosecutors
to find out whether the incumbent mayor used any levers of power in
the acquisition of the property that he officially declared to be
the owner of.

Speaking at an ANC rally on April 30 the opposition party’s leader
Levon Ter-Petrosyan claimed that attempts to have a candidate like
Margaryan reelected show that [President] Serzh Sargsyan “does not
give a damn about public opinion.”

Representatives of the RPA have dismissed such statements by the
opposition leader, insisting that Margaryan has been one of the most,
if not the most, popular mayor of Yerevan ever and has deserved
reelection due to his hard work praised by many residents of the
capital. They also consider it normal that Margaryan, the son of
late Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan and former popular prefect
of the administrative district of Avan, should be in possession of
such property.

Meanwhile, at the rally, Ter-Petrosyan described the upcoming elections
in Yerevan as ‘politically crucial for the regime’. At the same time,
he addressed a friendly call to all political forces and civil society
organizations to put aside their differences and give “a decisive
battle to the regime on May 5 to recover Yerevan from its claws.”

“Unfortunately, the authorities realize the gravity of the moment
better than many of the [other] parties. This is evidenced by their
reverting to violence, terror, provocations, especially against ANC
and Prosperous Armenia Party activists,” said Ter-Petrosyan.

Several incidents have occurred during the current election campaign.

In one of them an ANC activist was assaulted presumably by RPA
loyalists while canvassing for his party in a Yerevan suburb. In
another major incident a reporter with a pro-opposition paper covering
an RPA campaign meeting was assaulted by one of the candidates of
the ruling party.

In Ter-Petrosyan’s opinion, an opposition bloc can be formed after
the elections to prevent the RPA from reinstalling its mayor. But
before that the opposition claims the RPA will try to rig the vote
to secure the number of seats in the 65-member body required for the
automatic election of the mayor. In particular, one of the allegations
is that non-residents of Yerevan will be brought to the capital on
Election Day to vote. Under law, citizens who are not registered in
Yerevan but live in the capital for at least three years can also
take part in the vote. Some experts believe the authorities may try
to benefit from this legal provision by having loyalists from the
regions participating in the vote.

At a rally on May 1, Raffi Hovannisian, a former presidential candidate
and leader of another opposition party, Heritage, which is contesting
the May 5 elections as part of the Hello Yerevan bloc, said that a
new situation will emerge in the country after next Sunday’s elections
and that this situation will be unimaginable without Hello Yerevan.

Hovannisian, whose finish with 37 percent of the vote in last
February’s presidential election came as a surprise to a great
many political observers, spoke of another surprise in store for
the government on May 5. “The government will not last for another
5 years… and after May 5, Taron Margaryan, the son of Andranik
Margaryan, with all due respect to him, will not be the mayor of the
capital,” said the opposition leader.

Meanwhile, the Prosperous Armenia Party, which calls itself
an ‘alternative’ rather than opposition yet, continues an active
campaign, confident of the outright victory of its top candidate,
former Minister of Foreign Affairs Vartan Oskanian. While many experts
still see a possibility of PAP leader Gagik Tsarukyan striking another
coalition deal with President Sargsyan after the Yerevan elections,
several representatives of PAP have ruled out the possibility of the
party’s returning to the RPA-dominated government.

Armenian Government To Allocate Amd 168 Million To Mfa For Opening E

ARMENIAN GOVERNMENT TO ALLOCATE AMD 168 MILLION TO MFA FOR OPENING EMBASSY IN SWEDEN

13:14 02/05/2013 ” SOCIETY

Today, the Armenian government adopted a decision to allocate AMD
168 million to the Armenian Foreign Ministry for opening an embassy
in Sweden.

Armenia established diplomatic relations with Sweden in 1992.

Armenian-Swedish relations have become more intensive in the past 7-8
years. Parliamentary friendship groups operate in Armenia and Sweden.

Armenian and Swedish parliamentarians last met during the
Sweden-Armenia parliamentary friendship group’s visit to Armenia
in 2011.

Sweden is the only Scandinavian country whose parliament has recognized
the Armenian Genocide (2010).

Source: Panorama.am