Not everyone who wants can become Armenian – Istanbul Provincial Hal

Not everyone who wants can become Armenian – Istanbul Provincial Hall

December 14, 2013 | 08:08

A family in Turkey, which had returned to their Armenian roots and
wished to enroll their child in an Armenian school in Istanbul,
recently filed a respective petition with the court.

In turn, the Istanbul Provincial Hall sent a ridiculous defense
statement to the court.

In the statement, Istanbul Provincial Hall justified why it had not
permitted the child to attend an Armenian school, Radikal daily of
Turkey reports.

The statement noted that solely national minorities can be enrolled in
national minority schools in Turkey, there is no information on the
Armenian roots of the plaintiff, whereas the Armenian church paper,
according to which the child is Armenian, is not enough.

The statement also noted that the Interior Ministry special code for
the Armenians was not applied for the given family, and, according to
Istanbul Provincial Hall, not everyone who wants can become Armenian.

To note, however, the court did not take the given Istanbul Provincial
Hall statement into consideration and instructed the provincial hall
to allow the child to attend an Armenian school. The court stressed
that the use of ethnic codes to determine the ethnic identity of a
person runs contrary to human rights.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Poverty-stricken Armenia’s government squandering money on cars

Zhoghovurd: Poverty-stricken Armenia’s government squandering money on cars

12:45 – 14.12.13

The Armenian cabinet on Monday passed a decision to allocate an
equivalent of $195,000 from its reserves to purchase cars for
different government agencies, the paper has learned.

It is reportedly planned to buy 69 service cars for different
subdivisions of the National Assembly, Control Chamber, the Special
Investigative Service, the Ministry of Education and Science and the
Central Election Commission.

`The Government affords such a luxury notwithstanding the 32.5%
poverty rate in the country’, the paper says, adding that the
decision, not published on the Government’s website, is available only
in the Official Bulletin, a weekly publication providing updates on
legal acts.

The paper concludes that the government very probably avoided
publicity, afraid of the society’s possible wild reaction.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2013/12/14/joghovurd1/

Reflections of a Participant at the `Islamized Armenians’ Conference

Reflections of a Participant at the `Islamized Armenians’ Conference in Istanbul

Friday, December 13th, 2013

`Islamized in 1915: History and Bearing Witness’ panelists (left to
right): Arda Melkonian, Doris Melkonian, Vahe Tachjian, Ronald Suny
(chair), and Ishkhan Chiftjian.

BY DORIS K. MELKONIAN

Passing through the security gates of the historic Bogazici
University, the former Robert College, I was struck by the beauty and
serenity of the campus as we meandered through a drive paralleling the
breathtaking Bosphorus on the right. The contrast of the bustling
touristic Sultanahmet and Taksim districts to the tranquil campus was
undeniable. While absorbing the beauty of my surroundings, I was
reminded of my friend, Steve, a native of Istanbul, who described his
student days here at the university with such passion. His love for
this institution was evident in his voice as he instructed me to walk
by the Bosphorus and `breathe in the air’ for him. As I was following
his explicit instructions, I was sadly reminded of other young
Armenian men who attended this institution a century ago with hopes
and dreams for a brighter future. Unlike my friend, Steve, their goals
and dreams were never to be realized as the Genocide robbed them of a
golden future. Their stories flooding my mind, created an inner
conflict as I was forced to reconcile this dark past with the
present-day beauty of magnificent stone buildings of Bogazici
University.

A range of emotions colliding within me, I made my way through a
courtyard teeming with Armenian and non-Armenian attendees, to
encounter yet additional security checks and a metal detector, prior
to entering Albert Long Hall where the conference was to take place.
The hall, with remnants of years gone by, showcased a massive pipe
organ that dominated one end and a choir loft, the other end.

The audience, exceeding 500, had assembled into this majestic hall. As
I gazed at the sea of attendees, I was struck by how different the
audience looked compared to United States audiences. What was
immediately noticeable were women, young and middle-aged, with head
coverings, quietly seated, listening attentively.

As speaker after speaker provided historical accounts, analyses,
vignettes, and narratives of ordeals endured by survivors both during
and after the Genocide, a sense of sorrow permeated the proceedings
for me. My heart ached not only for the loss of precious Armenian
lives during the Genocide but for the tragic fate endured by the
fragment of the Armenian population who had been left behind.

In the diaspora, we mourn the 1.5 million who perished during the
Genocide. We seldom remember the remnants of the Armenian community
who couldn’t leave and were forced to assimilate. They experienced a
different kind of death – a living death, suffering in silence and
isolation. While presenting my paper, I remembered my maternal
grandfather, Natan, who was taken into a Muslim household as a little
boy. Had he not escaped, he would have suffered the same fate as many
Islamized Armenians.

The conference concluded with grandchildren of Islamized Armenians
describing the sting of rejection by the Armenian community, and their
longing for acceptance. Tears rolled down my cheeks as I listened to
their pain. Their grief and suffering, palpable with each uttered
word, deeply resonated within me. My heart ached for these individuals
who don’t belong to either community – Turkish Muslim nor Armenian
Christian. I couldn’t help but grieve with them, as feelings of
empathy for their suffering found root within me.

As Armenians – Christian Armenians, how should we respond? When an
Islamized Armenian, in the halls of a Turkish university, publically
exclaims `I am Armenian!’, what should our response be? Do we accept
them into our midst, thus creating a mosaic of Armenians? As
Christians, do we embrace them with the love of Christ? Or do we
reject and abandon them?

At the conclusion of this historic conference, I left the tranquil
campus consumed with inner turmoil, a different kind of turmoil from
what I experienced initially, as I contemplated the challenges we will
face as a community as we respond to this group of hybrid individuals.
Today, on the eve of the Genocide centennial, the surfacing of
Islamized Armenians is a reminder of the trauma that has impacted us,
of the tremendous loss that we as a nation have endured, and of the
challenges that lie before us.

I went to Istanbul with great anticipation to present my paper, to
meet fellow scholars from around the world, to reunite with friends
and make new ones.

However, I did not expect to be forced to confront my own uneasiness
at the notion of a `Muslim Armenian.’

I did not expect to find myself mourning the pain of fellow human
beings, fellow Armenians.

I did not expect to be moved so deeply, to find myself reaching out
and hugging strangers who didn’t share my language, my religion, my
culture, but who nonetheless considered themselves Armenians.

Having encountered Islamized Armenians and their stories, how can my
response be anything other than compassion, acceptance, and love?

http://asbarez.com/117402/reflections-of-a-participant-at-the-%E2%80%98islamized-armenians%E2%80%99-conference-in-istanbul/

Andrzej Kasprzy: OSCE MG has reason for optimism on Nagorno-Karabakh

Andrzej Kasprzy: OSCE MG has reason for optimism on Nagorno-Karabakh process

14:06 14.12.2013

Andrzej Kasprzy, OSCE Minsk Group

Azerbaijani and Armenian Presidents Ilham Aliyev and Serzh Sargsyan
have made it clear that they intend to build on the momentum of their
meetings and intensify the peace process, which indeed gives ground
for optimism in 2014, OSCE Chairperson-in-Office Personal
Representative Andrzej Kasprzyk told Trend.

`In the last few weeks I have heard cautiously optimistic assessments
from Armenian and Azerbaijani officials,’ he said.

`With the permission and assistance of the sides, OSCE mission members
have visited the contact line on 17 occasions in 2013,’ Kasprzyk
added.

`Local commanders, as well as civilian authorities, have raised a
number of serious concerns during these visits,’ he said. `These
concerns include: the risk to life posed to civilians and military
personnel, both from ceasefire violations and mine-related incidents;
and the debilitating psychological and economic impact on those living
close to the contact line.’

`The number of those reported killed or wounded as a result of
ceasefire violations in 2013 is less than in 2012,’ Kasprzyk said.
`However, the ceasefire remains self-regulated: the risks remain as
serious as ever, and those living close to the contact line will
continue to suffer hardship until such time as the ceasefire is
strengthened.’

`The Minsk Group Co-Chairs and the Personal Representative have
mandates to work with the parties to develop confidence-building and
other measures,’ he said.

`Presidents Aliyev and Sargsyan have called for additional steps to
strengthen the ceasefire and carry out confidence-building measures in
all fields in order to create a better atmosphere for the
negotiations,’ he said.

`One of confidence-building measures would be to develop humanitarian
contacts among the two sides, intelligentsia, academic and public
circles,’ Kasprzyk said.

Moreover, Kasprzyk’s team has been helping to elaborate a mechanism
for investigating potential incidents.

`Implementation of some confidence-building measures is more
complicated than that of others,’ he said. `But these measures can and
– sooner or later – will help reduce tensions on the contact line and
the international border; reduce the risks faced by military personnel
and those living close to the front lines; and create a better
atmosphere for the negotiations, allowing Presidents Aliyev and
Sargsyan to make demonstrable progress towards a lasting political
settlement.’

http://www.armradio.am/en/2013/12/14/andrzej-kasprzy-osce-mg-has-reason-for-optimism-on-nagorno-karabakh-process/

Un Comité National Arménien formé en Roumanie

ROUMANIE
Un Comité National Arménien formé en Roumanie

La formation du Comité National Arménien (ANC) de la Roumanie a eu
lieu le 23 Novembre, dans les locaux du diocèse arménien de la
Roumanie en présence du Primat, président d’honneur Mgr Tadev
Hakobyan-Mouradian et en présence du président de la Fédération
Euro-Arménienne pour Justice et la Démocratie (FEAJD) Kaspar
Karampetian.

Un membre du Comité National Arménien de Belgique, Irina Manoukian,
était également présente.

samedi 14 décembre 2013,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=95261

ANKARA: Turkish History Body ‘profiling’ Scholars Working On Armenia

TURKISH HISTORY BODY ‘PROFILING’ SCHOLARS WORKING ON ARMENIAN ISSUE: REPORT

Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
Dec 13 2013

ANKARA

TTK chief Metin Hulagu denied that the body had been “profiling”
scholars. AA Photo

The Turkish Historical Society (TTK) has been “profiling” scholars
and students working on the Armenian issue, weekly Agos has reported.

According to the report, the TTK demanded the names, contact
information and area of study of PhD and master’s degree students
from the Higher Education Board (YOK).

TTK chief Metin Hulagu denied that the body had been “profiling”
scholars, but admitted that they gathered information on academic work.

“This fabricated story is an urban legend. They don’t use the real
meaning of ‘profiling.’ As the TTK we never profile, we are an academic
institution. Profiling is a hot topic these days and somebody wants
us to be a part of it,” Hulagu told the Hurriyet Daily News.

“As the TTK, we carry out these works in cooperation with universities
and we release some researchers’ books,” he said, adding that the
work of his society was to focus on all kinds of subjects, including
the Armenian issue.

However, two academics, who spoke to the Daily News on condition of
anonymity, said they were not surprised that their information had
been sought by official bodies, but added that the TTK’s involvement
was surprising.

“As university researchers, we already knew that YOK was doing
profiling about those of us who were doing research on the Armenian
issue, but we are really surprised to hear that TTK was also involved,”
said one Turkish historian.

He added that in recent years many young Turkish historians had been
conducting research on the Armenian issue, but had concerns about
their future career in Turkey because of their chosen research topic.

“The young generation of Turkish historians wants to break the
‘Armenian taboo’ [in Turkey],” he said, urging Turkey to face “the
reality” and leave behind “100 years of denial politics.”

Another historian, a 35-year-old currently completing his doctorate
degree in the Netherlands, said he had moved out of Turkey because
of such concerns.

“I couldn’t continue researching in an atmosphere like that,” he said.

Vercihan Ziflioglu from the Istanbul office contributed to this report

December/13/2013

ANKARA: Turkish FM Visits Yerevan, Meets Armenian Counterpart

TURKISH FM VISITS YEREVAN, MEETS ARMENIAN COUNTERPART

Journal of Turkish Weekly
Dec 13 2013

13 December 2013

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu was in Yerevan on December
12 for a meeting of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation group.

It was the first visit to Armenia by a high-level Turkish official
in nearly five years.

On the sidelines of the gathering, Davutoglu met with Armenian Foreign
Minister Eduard Nalbandian.

Turkey and Armenia remain deeply divided over the mass killings of
Armenians during the World War I era.

The two countries have no diplomatic relations, and Turkey closed
its border with Armenia in 1993 in solidarity with Azerbaijan in its
conflict with Armenia over the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Efforts in 2009 to establish diplomatic relations and reopen the
border failed.

Protesters met Davutoglu’s entourage in Yerevan on December 12,
forcing him to enter the conference building through a back door.

Turkish FM Calls 1915 Deportation Of Armenians ‘Inhumane’

TURKISH FM CALLS 1915 DEPORTATION OF ARMENIANS ‘INHUMANE’

ANSA Med, Italy
Dec 13 2013

Expresses hope for a ‘just memory’ after Yerevan meeting

(ANSAmed) – ANKARA, DECEMBER 13 – The deportation of hundreds
of thousands of Armenians in Turkey in 1915 was “inhumane”, said
Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu. The remark was made on
his return from Armenia’s capital, Yerevan, where he took part in
a regional cooperation conference on Thursday. A 2009 agreement for
the normalization of relations between Turkey and Armenia has not yet
been implemented. Ankara and Yerevan have opposing standpoints on the
disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh and the Armenian diaspora’s
demand that there be official recognition of the 1915-1917 “genocide”
in Turkey during the last years of the Ottoman Empire.

Ankara has always refused to agree to the using the term ‘genocide’
to refer to the killing of about 1.5 million Armenians. Davutoglu,
who met with his Armenian counterpart Eduard Nalbandian in Yerevan,
told reporters that the Turkish government “does not approve in
any way of the deportations” of Armenians, and that he hoped that a
collective consciousness between the two countries could be created
with a “just memory”. Hurriyet Online reports that the Turkish minister
admitted that the deportations of Armenians a century ago had been a
“totally wrong practice”. (ANSAmed).

Turkey’s Kurds Seek Forgiveness For 1915 Armenian Genocide

TURKEY’S KURDS SEEK FORGIVENESS FOR 1915 ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

Assyrian International News Agency AINA
Dec 13 2013

“The Armenian population is melting.”

This bleak assessment was pronounced by Sahak Mashalyan, an Armenian
Orthodox priest, during a recent Sunday mass at the Asdvadzadzin
church in Istanbul. Reeling off the statistics: 482 funerals, 236
baptisms and 191 weddings, the black-robed cleric solemnly intoned,
“These figures point to a community … that is dying.”

Little over a century ago, the Armenian Patriarchate put Anatolia’s
Armenian population at more than two million. In 1915, tragedy struck.

Estimated figures vary, but between 800,000 and a million Armenians are
thought to have been slaughtered by Ottoman forces and their Kurdish
allies in what many respected historians call the first genocide of
the 20th century. Turkey vehemently denies any genocidal intent. The
official line is that most of the Armenians died from hunger and
disease, as they were forcibly deported to the deserts of Syria amid
the upheaval of the collapsing empire.

The ruling Islamic Justice and Development Party has done more than
any of its pro-secular predecessors to improve the lot of Christian
minorities and to encourage freer debate of the horrors that befell
them. Yet it has also showered millions of dollars on international
lobbying firms in a vain effort to peddle the official version of
events. A steady trickle of nations continue to recognize the events
of 1915 as genocide. Turkey’s biggest worry is that on the centenary in
2015, the United States will risk wrecking relations and follow suit.

In Turkey’s mainly Kurdish southeastern province of Diyarbakir, global
diplomacy does not figure in the calculations of Abdullah Demirbas,
the mayor of the city’s ancient Sur district. A maze of narrow cobbled
streets lined with decrepit stone houses, Sur used to be known as
the “neighborhood of the infidels” because of the large number of
Armenians, Syrian Orthodox Christians and Jews who once lived there.

Since being twice elected to office on the ticket of Turkey’s largest
pro-Kurdish party, Peace and Democracy (BDP), Demirbas, a stocky former
schoolteacher with an easy smile, has thrown himself wholeheartedly
into making amends for the past.

“As Kurds, we also bear responsibility for the suffering of the
Armenians,” he told Al-Monitor over glasses of ruby-red tea. “We are
sorry, and we need to prove it.” As a first step, Demirbas launched
free Armenian-language classes two years ago at the municipality
offices. “They were an instant hit,” Demirbas said. Many of those who
enrolled were thought to be “hidden Armenians” or the descendants of
those who converted to Islam to survive.

One such “hidden Armenian,” a gnarled octogenarian called Ismail,
confided to Al-Monitor that his father’s real name was Leon.

“They wiped out his entire family, out in the fields,” he said as he
awaited an audience with Demirbas. The old man’s voice cracked with
emotion. “My father was rescued by a Turkish officer and became a
Muslim. But though, praise God, I am a good Muslim too, praying five
times a day, I know I am not accepted,” he added. “In their minds,
I am always the son of the unbeliever.”

The Kurds’ role in the killings has been well documented, increasingly
now by the Kurds themselves.

Egged on by their Ottoman rulers, Kurdish tribal chieftains raped,
murdered and pillaged their way through the southeast provinces where
for centuries they had co-existed, if uneasily, with the Armenians and
other non-Muslims. Henry Morgenthau, who served as US ambassador in
Constantinople at the height of the bloodshed, described the Kurds’
complicity in his chilling 1918 memoir Ambassador Morgenthau’s
Story thusly:

“The Kurds would sweep down from their mountain homes. Rushing up
to the young girls, they would lift their veils and carry the pretty
ones off to the hills. They would steal such children as pleased their
fancy and mercilessly rob all the rest of the throng. … While they
were committing these depredations, the Kurds would freely massacre,
and the screams of women and old men would add to the general horror.”

Osman Koker, a Turkish historian who has chronicled Armenian life
through a rich collection of postcards and photographs predating 1915,
reckons more than half of Diyarbakir’s population was non-Muslim
before the violence began.

“Most of them were Armenians, now there are none,” Koker told
Al-Monitor in an interview. Hashim Hashimi, a former member of
parliament and a Sunni Muslim spiritual leader with a robust following,
told Al-Monitor, “Sadly, many imams were convincing people that if
they killed an infidel they would find their place in heaven and be
rewarded with beautiful girls.” This meant that thousands of Syrian
Orthodox and other Christians were not spared, either.

In 2009 Demirbas and Osman Baydemir, a fellow BDP politician and the
mayor of Greater Diyarbakir, decided to help with the restoration of
an Armenian Orthodox church that had lay in ruins for decades in Sur.

Baydemir donated a third of the costs of restoring Surp Giragos to
its former magnificence. In 2011 the church, said to be the largest
Armenian church in the Middle East, opened its doors as a fully
functioning house of worship.

Ergun Ayik, an Armenian entrepreneur and philanthropist who runs the
Surp Giragos Foundation, told Al-Monitor that the BDP mayors “went
out of their way to help us,” even providing the church with free
utilities and security guards. A new museum of Armenian culture that is
due to open by the end of 2013 within the Surp Giragos complex under
the sponsorship of the Greater Diyarbakir municipality should also
help draw tourists, not to mention thousands of “hidden Armenians”
thought to be scattered across the southeast.

Silva Ozyerli, an Armenian activist from Diyarbakir who left for
Istanbul in the 1970s, has agreed to donate some family treasures,
including a silk nightshirt, several finely embroidered tablecloths
and a pair of engraved copper bowls to the museum. Ozyerli voiced
her enthusiasm for the project in an interview with Al-Monitor.

“You know why it is dear to me?” she asked a tinge of defiance creeping
into her voice. “It is because everything in that museum will show
people that not too long ago, Diyarbakir was every bit as Armenian
as it was Kurdish, if not more so.”

By Amberin Zaman AL Monitor

Les déportations des Arméniens en 1915 ont été inhumaines selon Ahme

ARMENIE
Les déportations des Arméniens en 1915 ont été inhumaines selon Ahmet Davutoglu

Les déportations des Arméniens en 1915 étaient inhumaines, et la
Turquie n’a jamais soutenu cette décision a déclaré jeudi le ministre
turc des Affaires étrangères Ahmet DavutoÄ?lu lors d’une visite
historique en Arménie.

Accompagné par le vice-ministre turc des Affaires étrangères Feridun
Sinirlioglu, Ahmet DavutoÄ?lu s’est rendu à Erevan pour une réunion de
l’organisation de la coopération économique de la mer Noire (CEMN). Le
chef de la diplomatie turque a rencontré son homologue arménien,
Edouard Nalbandian, en marge du sommet.

`Nous sommes très satisfaits de la rencontre avec Nalbandian, elle
était sincère. L’objectif principal est de créer un environnement de
dialogue sur une base solide », a déclaré Ahmet DavutoÄ?lu après la
réunion, tout en rejetant les revendications qu’il a suggéré Ã
l’Arménie qu’elle se retire de deux régions du Haut-Karabagh.

« Notre rencontre a été d’une importance relative afin de surmonter un
palier psychologique. … Dans ce sens, elle [la réunion] a été utile
`, a noté M. DavutoÄ?lu.

Ahmet DavutoÄ?lu a exprimé son espoir que la conscience collective
entre les deux pays pourrait être créé avec une « mémoire juste ».

`Nous parlons de `juste mémoire`. Ce que je veux dire avec cela c’est
que nous devrions connaître les faits. Ensuite, nous voyons que les
relations turco-arméniennes ne ressemblent pas aux liens
germano-juifs. Dans chaque rue, il y a un signe commun. Après avoir
découvert cela, alors vous voyez la déportation, que je considère
comme une pratique tout à fait mauvaise fait par [les dirigeants de
l’époque ottomane dans le cadre du Comité Union et Progrès]. C’était
inhumain `, a dit M. DavutoÄ?lu à un groupe de journalistes en route
vers Erevan et cité par le journal Hurriyet.

`Mais quand vous écrivez une histoire en prenant la déportation en
compte, une conscience collective a été créé Ã partir de ce côté-ci
[la Turquie] que les Arméniens ont trahi leur pays et ont mérité la
déportation. Nous devons détruire ces deux consciences collectives.
Nous avons aboli cette mauvaise conscience en 2005, mais les Arméniens
l’ont encore `, a-t-il déclaré.

`Notre objectif principal n’est pas seulement d’ouvrir la frontière
turco-arménienne, mais de former une fondation qui va ouvrir la voie Ã
une paix globale`, a déclaré M. DavutoÄ?lu. `Cela repose sur trois
piliers. Le premier est celui des relations entre la Turquie et
l’Arménie. Le second est celui des relations Azerbaïdjan-Arménie. Cela
inclut également les liens entre la Géorgie et l’Abkhazie. Le
troisième est les relations entre Turcs et Arméniens `, a-t-il dit.

`Si l’un des piliers est paralysé, cela va créer la détresse. Disons
que nous avons ouvert la porte de la frontière arménienne. Comme une
guerre a éclaté entre l’Arménie et l’Azerbaïdjan, alors nous étions
obligés de la refermer. La chose la plus difficile est de décongeler
l’iceberg du statu quo. Vous pouvez commencer une guerre quand vous
essayer de le décongeler `, a-t-il dit.

Le ministre turc des Affaires étrangères a dit que son pays était en
pourparlers avec la diaspora arménienne.

`Dans le passé, parler avec la diaspora a été perçue comme une menace
ou visait des questions de renseignement. Les diplomates pensaient, «
Que ferais-je ? si cela était enregistrée. Mais maintenant cela est
devenu un devoir. Depuis ce temps, chaque fois que je vais Ã
l’étranger je rencontre la communauté arménienne s’il y en a une. Nous
ne signalons pas publiquement les gens que nous rencontrons en raison
du fait que les Arméniens extrémistes peuvent causer des problèmes `,
a-t-il dit.

`Ce que nous savons, c’est que si vous ne pouvez pas fournir une base
à des liens avec la diaspora, cela met la pression sur les liens avec
l’Arménie et cela se traduit par une impasse.`

« Notre priorité est de construire le dialogue sur une base
psychologique saine et continuer sur ce chemin` a conclut le ministre
turc des Affaires étrangères.

samedi 14 décembre 2013,
Stéphane ©armenews.com