Armenian MP: Gazprom Has Received The Right For Sole Gas Supplies To

ARMENIAN MP: GAZPROM HAS RECEIVED THE RIGHT FOR SOLE GAS SUPPLIES TO ARMENIA UNTIL 2043

by Arthur Yernjakyan
Tuesday, December 17, 17:41

Gazprom OJSC has received the right for sole gas supplies to Armenia
until 2043, opposition MP Alexander Arzumanyan said during the Dec
17 parliamentary hearings.

He said that this provision was stipulated in the Armenian-Russian
agreement on the order of natural gas price formation, which was signed
during Russian President Vladimir Putin’s visit to the republic in
early December 2013. “You have signed an agreement on capitulation
of Armenia, which has no right to buy gas from anyone else within the
next 30 years. What if we improve relations with Azerbaijan?” he said.

For his part, Armenian Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, said
that the long-term agreement is aimed at ensuring steady gas supply.

He added that this is not an oppressive contract and Gazprom cannot
forbid Armenia to negotiate with other suppliers. “Moreover, in early
2014 Armenia will continue the negotiations with Iran over the gas
prices. I have repeatedly discussed the Iranian gas price at the
highest level, however, Iran’s interregional price is no lower than
$400 per 1,000 cu m, whereas from Russia we buy the gas for $189”,
he said.

http://www.arminfo.am/index.cfm?objectid=484BE3E0-6729-11E3-BC4E0EB7C0D21663

Defense Ministry Vows Harsh Preventive Measures After Azeri Attack

DEFENSE MINISTRY VOWS HARSH PREVENTIVE MEASURES AFTER AZERI ATTACK

December 16, 2013 – 15:11 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Azerbaijan continues ignoring the OSCE Minsk
Group co-chairs’ calls for preservation of ceasefire. According to
Armenian Defense Ministry statement, the co-chairs reiterated their
call to preserve ceasefire at the November 5 meeting with Defense
Minister Seyran Ohanyan. As a result, Armenia didn’t fire a single
shot throughout the whole period.

“The incident that left Hrant Poghosyan dead is another proof of
continuing Azeri policy of ceasefire violation, despite the calls of
the co-chairs, during the latter’s visit to Baku. Armenian armed forces
will take harsh preventive measures,” the ministry’s statement said.

The Armenian armed forces soldier, private Hrant Poghosyan was killed
in Azeri shelling December 14.

The co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group: Igor Popov of Russia, Jacques
Fore of France, James Warlick of the U.S., and Personal Representative
of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office Andrzej Kasprzyk met Azeri President
Ilham Aliyev in Baku. The co-chairs will next travel to Yerevan.

Over 14000 ceasefire violations by Azeri armed forces were reported
at the contact line in 2012.

Azerbaijan fired over 68700 shots from various caliber weapons towards
Karabakh positions, with intensified instances of ceasefire violations
reported during state holidays and special events.

914 ceasefire violations were registered in December 2012 when
Azerbaijan fired over 170 shots from sniper weapons, with 6 shots
fired from large-caliber sniper weapons.

About 1000 ceasefire violations by Azerbaijan were reported in
November, with 210 shots fired from sniper weapons.

The number of ceasefire violations by Azeris in October totaled 1050,
in September – 1185, in August – 1161 and over 1300 and 3750 in July
and June respectively.

http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/173996/

ANKARA: Can Turkish-Armenian Rapprochement Be Revived?

CAN TURKISH-ARMENIAN RAPPROCHEMENT BE REVIVED?

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Dec 17 2013

AMANDA PAUL
[email protected]

Three years since efforts to normalize relations between Turkey and
Armenia collapsed, Ankara is seeking to revive the process.

On Nov. 6, Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu stated in a session of
Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Commission: “Our efforts in advance of
2015 are continuing at full speed. Our demand is that the Armenians
pull out of Karabakh. We are expecting a move on this issue. If it
happens, both the border crossing and the railroad will be reopened
and other relations will follow. But we want to do this together with
Azerbaijan.” It also seems that Davutoglu raised the issue with both
Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, during Aliyev’s visit to Ankara on
Nov. 12, and with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Saint Petersburg
on Nov. 12, as well as during a visit to Washington on Nov. 18-19.

These developments were followed by Davutoglu’s trip to Armenia on
Dec. 12. While he was there for a meeting of foreign ministers from
the Organization for the Black Sea Cooperation (BSEC), Davutoglu
clearly wanted to test the lay of the land in terms of kick-starting
a new rapprochement effort.

Last time, following two years of secret talks, Turkey and Armenia
signed two protocols aimed at normalizing ties in Zurich on Oct. 10,
2009. However, it all went wrong after that. Despite the fact that the
protocols made no reference to Nagorno-Karabakh, Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan made progress on Karabakh a condition of ratification of
the protocols, including returning regions of Azerbaijan that Armenia
presently occupies. Meanwhile, Armenia’s Constitutional Court approved
the protocols with “reservations” before sending them to parliament for
ratification. Turkey declared that the court’s reasoning went “against
the spirit of the protocols.” Consequently, Armenian President Serzh
Sarksyan announced Armenia was suspending the ratification process on
the grounds that Turkey was putting conditions on it. The event left
Sarksyan with egg on his face, having already come under significant
criticism from the powerful Armenian diaspora for entering into the
process with Turkey and while also having difficulty explaining to
much of society why the protocols did not include an apology for the
genocide, because for many Armenians the only way to have any sort
of friendship with Turkey is through the prism of recognition of the
genocide. It also became the first failure of Davutoglu’s zero problems
with neighbors policy. Moreover it created problems in Turkey’s
relations with Azerbaijan while broadly increasing regional tensions.

With both sides having burned their fingers, ever since then,
diplomatic activity has been in the “parking lot.” However, there
has been a lot of valuable second-track diplomacy, and through the
efforts of civil society and others Turks and Armenians continue to
get to know each other better.

Despite Davutoglu’s groundwork and spending two hours meeting with
Armenian Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandian, it seems unlikely that
Armenia will “re-board” this process. First of all, most Armenians
see the initiative as a mechanism to counter the pressure that Turkey
may come under approaching 2015, the 100th anniversary of the Armenian
genocide. Second, despite the fact that the process of normalization
could bring positive economic effects, Yerevan has further tightened
its relationship with Russia by deciding to join the Russian-led
customs union, which means its foreign policy orientation is less
Western-looking that it was previously, and this also plays a role.

Furthermore, a number of Armenian officials, including Nalbandian,
have stated that bilateral ties can be normalized only “without
any preconditions” — hence it seems that any effort to trade a
normalization of ties for the return of occupied territories will
fall flat on its face.

Yet ultimately these processes are now so inter-linked that it would
seem impossible to move one forward without the other. What is now
a lose-lose-lose for three countries could be turn into a win-win-win.

Furthermore, despite the explanation offered by Deputy Prime Minister
Bulent Arinc on Nov. 5 for how Turkey would counter the Armenians’
international campaigns for 2015, these efforts will be futile. No
matter what Turkey may try to do to try and discredit the genocide
allegation, it will fail because the issue is so internationally
accepted.

http://www.todayszaman.com/columnist/amanda-paul_334240_can-turkish-armenian-rapprochement-be-revived.html

Russia Forbids Armenia To Resell Its Gas To Other States

RUSSIA FORBIDS ARMENIA TO RESELL ITS GAS TO OTHER STATES

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Dec 17 2013

17 December 2013 – 12:52pm

Armenian Minister for Energy Armen Movsisyan said today that
customs-free gas and petroleum will be shopped from Russia according
to a quota system.

The statement was made at talks on an intergovernmental agreement on
cooperation between the Armenian and Russian governments in exports
of gas, petroleum and unprocessed diamonds.

Armenia will give Russia reports on annual gas and petroleum
consumption. Russia will use the data to form quotas for customs-free
trade. Armenia will not be allowed to resell cheap Russian energy
resources to other states.

Armenian Minister for Energy Armen Movsisyan said today that
customs-free gas and petroleum will be shopped from Russia according
to a quota system.

The statement was made at talks on an intergovernmental agreement on
cooperation between the Armenian and Russian governments in exports
of gas, petroleum and unprocessed diamonds.

Armenia will give Russia reports on annual gas and petroleum
consumption. Russia will use the data to form quotas for customs-free
trade. Armenia will not be allowed to resell cheap Russian energy
resources to other states.

IRI Foreign Minister: There Are No Obstacles For Developing Armenian

IRI FOREIGN MINISTER: THERE ARE NO OBSTACLES FOR DEVELOPING ARMENIAN-IRANIAN RELATION

20:23 16/12/2013 ” REGION

“There are no obstacles for developing Armenian Iranian relations,”
the Iranian official IRNA news agency reports, quoting Mohammad Javad
Zarif who has stated this at the meeting with the Armenian deputy FM
Shavarsh Kocharyan.

The Foreign Minister of Iran has touched upon the prospective of
the development of the relations of the two countries and has noted
in particular, “Broad opportunities are available in other branches
of Commerce and economy, which should be directed to development of
bilateral relations. The new cabinet of Iran gives great importance
to development of relations with the neighboring countries.”

Mohammad Javad Zarif has noted that IRI finds it necessary to give
peaceful solution to some of the regional conflicts and to establish
friendly and peaceful atmosphere between the countries of the region.

The RA deputy FM Shavarsh Kocharyan has welcomed the agreement reached
between Iran and the “5+1 group.”

Source: Panorama.am

Armenia and Greece to expand interparliamentary cooperation

Armenia and Greece to expand interparliamentary cooperation

17:30, 12 December, 2013

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 12, ARMENPRESS. On December 12 the Vice President of
the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia Eduard Sharmazanov
met with the delegation led by Kyriakos Gerontopoulos, Deputy Foreign
Minister of the Hellenic Republic.

Welcoming the guests in the NA, the Vice President has documented with
joy that the Armenian-Greek relations have a centuries-old history,
and the two peoples have had the same concerns through centuries.
Today, the agenda of the Armenian-Greek relations is full, and in the
newest period the relations of the two states are dynamically
developing. Eduard Sharmazanov has noted that in Armenia the Greek
community is rather active, and the cooperation unites the peoples.
Thanking them for actively taking part in recognition of the Armenian
Genocide, the Vice President highlighted the unity of the two peoples’
efforts in fighting the denial ahead of the 100th anniversary of the
Genocide. He also emphasized the role of the parliamentary diplomacy
in deepening of cooperation.

The Deputy Foreign Minister of the Republic of Greece Kyriakos
Gerontopoulos has noted that he is in Armenia for the first time, and
he positively evaluates the Armenian-Greek inter-parliamentary
relations. He has highlighted the development of the cooperation of
the two countries in inter-parliamentary assemblies. The Deputy
Foreign Minister has documented that in the Greek Parliament they
positively refer to the ongoing democratic reforms in Armenia.

© 2009 ARMENPRESS.am

http://armenpress.am/eng/news/743580/armenia-and-greece-to-expand-interparliamentary-cooperation.html

BAKU: Iran, Armenia stress expansion of ties

Trend, Azerbaijan
Dec 15 2013

Iran, Armenia stress expansion of ties

Iran Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif says the Islamic Republic
attaches great significance to its bilateral relations with
neighboring countries, particularly Armenia, Press TV reported.

In a Sunday meeting with visiting Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister
Shavarsh Kocharyan in Tehran, Zarif hailed “longstanding” and
“friendly” relations between Iran and neighboring Armenia.

“Iran’s new administration attaches special significance to the
expansion of ties with neighbors and we are willing to bolster these
relations more than before,” said the Iranian top diplomat.

He further stated that Iran and Armenia enjoy great economic and
commercial grounds for cooperation, stressing that frequent visits by
officials of the two countries can “play an effective role in the
expansion of bilateral ties.”

Tehran and Yerevan should continue their negotiations and cooperation
on regional and international issues, added the Iranian foreign
minister.

Kocharyan, for his part, expressed hope that reciprocal visits by
senior Armenian and Iranian officials would pave the way for further
enhancement of Tehran-Yerevan relations in all areas.

The Armenian diplomat reaffirmed his country’s support for the
landmark nuclear deal signed between Tehran and the Sextet of world
powers – the US, Britain, Russia, China, France and Germany – in
Geneva, Switzerland, on November 24.

Kocharyan also held a separate meeting with Iranian Deputy Foreign
Minister for Asia and Pacific Affairs Ebrahim Rahimpour on Sunday.

In November, Armenian Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Armen
Movsisyan paid a visit to Tehran. He met with President Hassan Rouhani
and his Iranian opposite number, Hamid Chitchian, during his stay.

Movsisyan and Chitchian signed three agreements for the implementation
of joint hydropower projects during their November talks in Tehran.

BAKU: Azeri official calls for Russian, Iranian pressure on Armenia

ANS TV (Azeri), Baku
Dec 11 2013

Azeri official calls for Russian, Iranian pressure on Armenia

[Translated from Azeri]

A senior Azerbaijani official has accused Armenia of disrupting
regional peace and stability and urged Iran and Russia to exert
pressure on that country.

“We are completely confident that if Armenia… is located in our
region and that if Armenia is currently conducting a policy of
occupation, then it bears international responsibility. Other
neighbouring states [Iran and Russia] should not be indifferent to
this international responsibility of Armenia and its policy of
aggression. Other neighbouring countries, Iran and Russia, should
exert pressure on Armenia as it is mainly Armenia who disrupts peace
and stability in the region,” Azerbaijani Deputy Foreign Minister
Xalaf Xalafov told reporters in remarks aired by privately-owned ANS
TV on 11 December.

In the meantime, Baku-based opposition Yeni Musavat newspaper
expressed cautious optimism about the resolution of the Nagornyy
Karabakh conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia.

“Following the [Azerbaijani and Armenian leaders’] Vienna meeting [on
19 November], the meeting between [Armenian Foreign Minister] Edvard
Nalbandyan and [his Azerbaijani counterpart] Elmar Mammadyarov in Kiev
[on 4 December] can be regarded as an announcement of a further
intensification in the [peace] talks,” the newspaper said.

The daily pointed out the “special activeness” in the resumption of
the peace talks that it said was demonstrated by James Warlick, the US
mediator in the Karabakh peace talks between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Yeni Musavat quoted Warlick as saying: “The latest talks conducted in
Vienna and Kiev showed that the sides want to break the deadlock…
However, one should admit that this requires strong political will.”

The daily added that the absence of Russia’s Karabakh mediator from
the 5 December Kiev meeting between Azerbaijani and Armenian pundits,
Eldar Namazov and David Shahnazaryan, which was organized by the US
mediator, showed that Russia was not happy about the US activity over
the conflict settlement.

BBCM note: Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and his Armenian
counterpart Serzh Sargsyan met in the Austrian capital Vienna on 19
November after a two-year break to discuss a peaceful settlement for
the disputed Nagornyy Karabakh region. The OSCE’s Minsk Group,
co-chaired by France, Russia and the USA, has mediated peace talks
between Yerevan and Baku following an early 1990s war over
Azerbaijan’s breakaway region and a cease-fire reached in 1994. The
Azerbaijani authorities have been particularly critical of the
mediators for their failure to secure a final peace treaty.

Will Turks, Armenians ever reconcile?

Al-Monitor
dec 15 2013

Will Turks, Armenians ever reconcile?

Author: Mustafa AkyolPosted December 15, 2013

When Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu visited Yerevan on Dec.
12, in the first high-level visit from Turkey to Armenia in five
years, he was greeted not only by his Armenian counterpart, Eduard
Nalbandyan, but also by political activists. The latter’s welcome,
however, was not a warm one. A group of protesters gathered in front
of Davutoglu’s hotel to protest Turkey’s `denial of the Armenian
genocide.’ They wanted `recognition, condemnation and reparations,’
and opposed the Turkish foreign minister for not taking those steps.

Perhaps this was a bit unfair to Davutoglu, though, who said on this
trip something that no other Turkish statesman has openly said before:
that the `deportation’ of Armenians from Anatolia in 1915 was
`inhumane.’ (In Turkey, `deportation’ is the official and the common
term for what others call `Armenian genocide.’) No wonder Turkey’s
nationalists criticized Davutoglu for taking such an `unpatriotic’
step. Writing in Yeni ÇaÄ?, a hardcore nationalist daily, columnist
Ahmet Atakan argued that Davutoglu acted `as if he is not as the
Turkish foreign minister, but a negotiator between the two sides
[Turks and Armenians].’ More important, the deputy chair of the main
opposition CHP (People’s Republican Party), Faruk Logoglu, criticized
Davutoglu on Twitter and wrote (with my translation from Turkish):

`FM Davutoglu said to the Armenian FM, `The deportation of 1915 was
inhumane.’ What was inhumane? What would he rather have been done?’

Logoglu’s reaction is significant because it represents the mainstream
view in Turkey about the tragic fate of Ottoman Armenians. Most people
here simply believe that it was a defensible act to protect the
Turkish homeland.

Here is why. A considerable portion of the people who call themselves
Turks today are in fact rooted not in modern-day Turkey, but in two
neighboring regions: the Balkans and the Caucasus. During the
century-long shrinking of the Ottoman Empire, millions of Muslims in
these two regions faced persecution and had to flee to Turkey proper.
My own great-grandfather, for example, was a Circassian (Çerkes) who
first resisted the Russian occupation of the Northwest Caucasus around
the 1860s and then had to migrate to Yozgat, Anatolia, during the
ethnic cleansing of Circassians. It is estimated that, during that
long process of Russian onslaught in the Caucasus, some 1.5 million
Circassian men, women and children were killed, and more than 1
million others were expelled to Turkey. Hence comes the saying, “If
you scratch a Turk, you find a Circassian persecuted by Russians
underneath.’

A similar story took place in the Balkans as well. As the Ottoman
Empire shrank and new nation-states emerged in former Ottoman
territories ‘ such as Serbia, Greece or Bulgaria ‘ Turks and other
Muslims in these countries faced various waves of persecution and mass
murder, resulting in millions of refugees. That is why there are
millions of Balkan immigrants in modern-day Turkey ‘ people whose
origin is Bosniak, Albanian, Pomak or Balkan Turk. In his book, Death
and Exile: The Ethnic Cleansing of Ottoman Muslims, 1821-1922,
American historian Justin McCarthy calculates that some 5 million
Ottoman Muslims perished in a century due to ethnic cleansing by their
enemies, most of whom were either Russians or the Eastern Orthodox
allies of the Russians.

This is the background that most Turks have in mind when they think of
what happened to Ottoman Armenians. Of course, Armenians, who lived in
Anatolia side by side with Turks for centuries, were not responsible
for the tragic fate of the Muslims in the Balkans or the Caucasus. But
in the early 20th century, Armenian nationalists in alliance with
imperialist Russia aimed at carving out an independent Armenia from
the collapsing Ottoman Empire. Had they succeeded, they could have
initiated an ethnic cleansing against the Muslims similar to what
happened in the Balkans and the Caucasus. This was the logic of the
Ottoman Young Turk wartime government which, in the spring of 1915,
made the tragic decision to deport all Armenians from Anatolia to
Syria in response to the Armenian Uprising that began earlier that
year. In was, in the minds of the Young Turks, a pre-emptive ethnic
cleansing.

To be sure, none of this justifies the death of even one of the
approximately 1 million Armenians who perished in that fateful year of
1915. This was, as Davutoglu put it, an `inhumane’ act. And it remains
a stain on Turkish history that I, as a fellow Turk, believe that we
Turks should apologize for. However, it did not take place in a
vacuum. Nor it did come out of a hateful ideology like that of the
Nazis against the Jews. It rather came out of a horrible historical
context which pitted the peoples of a crumbling empire against each
other and in which Turks suffered at least as much pain as they
caused.

Therefore, reconciliation between Turks and Armenians will be possible
only when this painful episode in history is understood in a way which
takes the perspectives of both sides into account. Armenians, most
naturally, recall only the suffering of their grandfathers and demand
respect for it. Turks, on the other hand, recall the sufferings of
their own grandfathers and question why the ethnic cleansing of the
Armenians is singled out among many other tragedies in which they were
the victims. Both sides need to understand the perspectives, and the
feelings, of the other side. Both sides, in other words, need to know
each other.

Read More:

Mustafa Akyol
Columnist

Mustafa Akyol is a columnist for Al-Monitor’s Turkey Pulse and a
columnist for Turkish Hurriyet Daily News and Star. His articles have
also appeared in Foreign Affairs, Newsweek, The New York Times, The
Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and The Guardian. He is the
author of Islam Without Extremes: A Muslim Case for Liberty.

http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/12/turks-armenians-reconciliation-davutoglu-yerevan-visit.html
http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/12/turks-armenians-reconciliation-davutoglu-yerevan-visit.html#

Prayers in Aleppo, campaign in Beirut for return of the kidnapped

Prayers in Aleppo, campaign in Beirut for return of the kidnapped

Dec 15, 2013

Aleppo, (SANA) _A religious mass has been held Sunday at the Armenian
Evangelical Church of Bethel in al-Sulaimanieh neighborhood in Aleppo
city for the release of the abducted bishops and nuns, and all the
abductees in Syria.

Worshippers lit candles and prayed for peace to prevail in Syria, for
the repose of the martyrs’ souls and the victory of the Syrian army.

Aleppo governor, Mohammad Wahid Aqqad said in a speech that ”the
crime of abducting the two bishops and detaining the nuns is
reprehensive and pulls the mask off the ugly face of the armed
terrorist groups and those providing them with support, funds and
cover.”

Attacks against mosques, churches and clergymen by terrorists ”run
counter to all divine religions that ban taking away human lives,” the
governor said, affirming that the crimes of terrorists serve to make
the Syrians more committed to their land.

Last April, an armed terrorist group kidnapped Bishop Yohanna Ibrahim,
head of the Syrian Orthodox Church (in Aleppo) and Bishop Boulos
Yaziji, head of the Greek Orthodox Church (in Aleppo) while they were
on humanitarian operations in the village of Kafr Dael in Aleppo
province.

Earlier this month, an armed terrorist group attacked St. Thecla
Convent in Maaloula town in Damascus Countryside and kidnapped Mother
Superior and a number of nuns.

Campaign in Lebanon to release abducted Syrian nuns, bishops

Lebanese Social, political activities on Sunday staged a sit-in before
the Turkish Embassy in Beirut, launching a popular campaign to release
the nuns of Tecla convent of Maaloula in Damascus countryside, Aleppo
bishops Paul Yazaji and Yohana Ibrahim, abducted by the armed
terrorist groups in Syria.

The participants in the sit-in affirmed that the campaign will be
launched in Lebanon and abroad to press Turkey, condemning the Turkish
authorities for not taking any move to release the nuns and bishops.

They held the Turkish government responsible for not releasing bishops
Yajazi and Ibrahim who were kidnapped while assuming a human mission
in Aleppo countryside.

The participants affirmed that the Christians are not a minority in
the region, but they are part of a wide civilization stretching from
Lebanon, Athens to Moscow.

M. Ismael/ Mazen

http://sana.sy/eng/386/2013/12/15/517766.htm