Garahanly on `golden era’ of Azerbaijan: millions of emigrants, unem

Garahanly on “golden era” of Azerbaijan: millions of emigrants,
unemployment, riots of populations, poverty, lost war

18:38 28/12/2013 » REGION

“How can the current period be assumed as the “golden era” of
Azerbaijan, if several millions of citizens have to live and wander in
different countries in search of money, work and a better life,”
writes Ziad Garahanly commenting on the statements of deputy chairman
of the ruling New Azerbaijan Party, the Deputy Prime Minister of the
Republic Ali Ahmedov who had noted that the current period is the
“golden era” for the Azerbaijani people.

In an article published by the Azerbaijani portal “Minval.az”, the
author wonders how the public riots in Guba, Ismayilli and numerous
protests of disgruntled citizens coincide with the statement of
“golden” noted by Ali Ahmedov, why in the current “golden era”
shocking price growth occurs in Azerbaijan, the life goes up rapidly
and a significant part of the population has to solve problems of
basic survival in the current difficult social conditions.

“If Azerbaijan is experiencing a “golden era”, then is there any need
to arrest, judge and condemn journalists, politicians, youth
activists, religious and community leaders for dissent or actions? Why
not show mercy towards the already wrongfully convicted? After all, it
is the mercifulness that is a sign of strong leadership. From where
did all these beggars, unemployed, homeless, alcoholics, drug addicts,
prostitutes, criminals who experience their “golden age” appear in the
country? Why such a sharp social polarization and a clear social
contrast exists in the country?” the material states.

The article reminds that the golden era in Spain, England and other
countries is considered to be the period of greatest prosperity and
military victories. Azerbaijan has lost the war. “The examples of all
countries show that their “golden age” comes at a time of victories
and conquests of lands and not after losses and defeats,” the article
reads.

The author wonders whether the current period can be called a “golden
era” in the life of Azerbaijan, when there is seen a significant
degradation in science, culture, education and public morality. Is
this the “golden era”, when people, as well as the Karabakh veterans,
losing hope from the existing bureaucratic tyranny, douse gasoline and
set themselves on fire publicly?

“These questions perhaps are not important for Mr. Ali Ahmedov. For
him and for many other privileged functionaries this really seems to
be a “golden era”, because they are spared the problems that all the
society lives with. So he is kind of right, this is a “golden era” for
the Azerbaijani privileged functionaries,” the author writes, noting
that the stress should be put not on the second but on the first word.

“Both the black gold and the gold of the periodic table has turned the
heads of our representatives of the ruling elite so much that they
have decided to extrapolate their own “golden destiny” of the
Azerbaijani people. It’s just funny!” the author writes.
As noted in the article Ali Ahmedov hastened to bestow his discovery
to the Azerbaijani people at the ruling party conference “Azerbaijan
2013-2018: Towards new goals.”

“Though, in the light of Ali Akhmedov’s epochal statement, the title
of the conference causes bewilderment: if Azerbaijan has already
reached its “golden era”, then what “new goals” it can have for the
next five years? Perhaps they strive for a “diamond age”?” the author
wonders.

http://www.panorama.am/en/politics/2013/12/28/golden-era-azerbaijan/

Proverbs, Politics, and Paris: An Interview with Nancy Kricorian

Jadaliyya
dec 28 2013

Proverbs, Politics, and Paris: An Interview with Nancy Kricorian

Nancy Kricorian loves proverbs, especially Armenian ones. She has been
collecting them for years, finding them in various books and corners
of the internet and then saving them in her ever growing collection,
which she shares through social media. Her current favorite – `Law is
written for the rich, punishment for the poor’ – is more than fitting
for the novelist, poet, and activist, who strives to highlight those
standing at the margins of society, whether through her novels or the
various campaigns she has organized as coordinator of the grassroots
social justice and anti-war movement, Code Pink: Women for Peace.

Born in Watertown, Massachusetts, Kricorian has received praise for
her novels Zabelle(1998), described as `haunting and convincing’ by
the New Yorker, and Dreams of Bread and Fire (2003), in which we
follow protagonist Ani Silver as she comes of age through romance and
college, as well as through her family’s tragic past during the
Armenian Genocide. `Kricorian does for young women what James Joyce
did for middle aged men,’ the Los Angeles Times Book Review swooned,
`she allows us to scramble safely amid the debris of new love,
rejection, sex, and identity.’

Kricorian’s newest book, All the Light There Was, published in 2013,
tells the story of an Armenian family during the Nazi occupation of
1940s Paris, with fourteen-year-old Maral Pegorian vividly narrating.
The heroine takes us deep into life during war in the neighborhood of
Belleville, describing her brother’s involvement in the Resistance and
her romance with Zaven, her brother’s close friend and neighbor. But
as Zaven flees to avoid conscription, the war invades Maral’s life in
ways she hadn’t prepared for.

Unlike her previous two novels, which drew on autobiographical
inspiration, All The Light There Wasrepresents new territory for the
author, who threw herself into the Pegorians’ world so vividly that it
began to invade her own reality.

I spoke to Kricorian from her home in New York City, as she was deep
in researching for her next novel, set in Beirut during the Civil War,
whose characters, as you might have guessed, are Armenian.

`It’s the community I came from; it’s what I know,’ Kricorian says of
her concentration on the Armenian experience. `It also has to do with
my very deep concern for human rights, social justice, and truth
telling, and I feel like there is still so much to be explored in the
Armenian Diaspora experience. It ties in with all of my political
concerns.’

Liana Aghajanian (LA): Your novels all deal with some aspect of being
Armenian, and more specifically, diasporan Armenian. What attracts you
to writing in this specific cultural theme?

Nancy Kricorian (NK): I grew up in the Armenian community. I grew up
in a two-family house in Watertown, Massachusetts; on the block where
I grew up half the families were Armenian. I went to the Armenian
church, and a third of my classmates at school were Armenian. I really
was in the community and then I desperately wanted to get out of
there, I wanted to get away, so when I went to college I thought, you
know, `I’m escaping,’ but then somehow it ended up that that is
somewhere my imagination went. I ended up in this `home’ place.

LA: You go through this change and transformation and then at some
point circle back to that.

NK: But you come back in a different place; you’re choosing how to be
involved in that community and you are choosing. It’s not that you
come full circle and come exactly back to the same place. It is that
you come back to the themes and the concerns with a new set of tools
that you have assembled after having left.

LA: Your latest piece of work, All the Light There Was, took ten years
to write and research. What was that process like?

NK: That was really, really long, but there were a couple of factors.
The first two books were based on family experience and stories. With
this one, my family was not in France during the occupation and I had
to do extensive research. I know that different writers have different
processes, but I really have to make sure that I have all the facts
straight. It drives me crazy that I would have some anachronistic
thing happening in the book, so I really wanted it to be as factually
accurate as possible. And then the other two pieces were my kids. It
turns out it is harder to have space in your head for your writing
when your kids are going from the ages of seven to seventeen. When
they’re younger, they are more physically exhausting, so you have more
space in your head for your work, and then I found as they were older,
they were more intellectually demanding. Also, in the meantime, I was
working with Code Pink. I was working thirty hours a week for this
anti-war women’s organization, so that cut into it too.

LA: You actually spent time in Paris. You wanted to experience what
your characters were experiencing. Why was that so important for you?

NK: I had to build the whole place in my head. I had to have the
apartment, the streets, the lycée, the park where she met with the guy
she was seeing. Going to Paris was to help do that, reading
voluminously about Belleville throughout the occupation, memoirs,
letters, to actually build it in my head, so that when I was working
on it, I went there.

I only have probably two solid hours of writing in my head a day. It’s
not like its twenty-four/seven for ten years; it was more like Monday
through Friday for two hours of the day I was in Paris during the
occupation, and there were bits and pieces sort of flowing up off and
on during the rest of the week.

LA: During the writing process, you also thought your characters were
coming alive; at one point you were stockpiling your pantry.

NK: I was thinking things like: `Oh poor Maral, she has no soap,’ and
then I look – I would stockpile all this soap, thinking, `Well, if war
ever came here, we wouldn’t have soap either. I better be saving the
soap.’ [laughs]

People have told me when they are reading the book that they feel
hungry reading it and feel cold reading it, and I really felt that
when I was working on it. The thing I was saying about building the
place and going to it? I was really in it, and so that sort of spilled
over into this worry about cold and hungry and not having soap in my
life here.

When I told my husband my next book was going to be on Armenians in
Beirut during the civil war, he said: `Great, are you going to start
collecting shell casings?’

LA: How did you go about choosing a very young girl as your main
character, and how did you transition from speaking in her voice
rather than in an adult voice?

NK: I feel that it is told from the girl, but it’s really Maral as an
adult, at least fifteen years after the war. It goes from when she’s
age fourteen to age twenty-one. I think in addition to being
interested in the Armenian diaspora experience, I am also deeply a
feminist, and I’m really interested in a woman’s experience – it has to
do with wanting to tell untold stories and also wanting to tell things
from a woman’s point of view.

There were books and films written about Missak Manouchian and the
Armenian involvement in the French Resistance, but I didn’t want it to
be heroic, where people were blowing things up and assassinating
Nazis. I really wanted it to be how did an ordinary girl survive and
live through this experience, and how do you stay humane and how do
you live your daily life?

LA: The one word that I often use to describe what the collective
Armenian experience is, is `resilience.’ To have gone through
everything – war, genocide, forced migration, and more – and to somehow
survive all of that, `resilience’ feels appropriate. How do you sum up
the experience?

NK: The thing that I love about it is the sort of humor and sadness,
but the word resilience is really a key word. I think what I have been
thinking about a lot now, I keep thinking of Armenians as birds. Think
about all the birds that are important to Armenians: there are songs
and poems about them, like the crane and swallow. You just think about
Armenians as birds who build nests that get knocked down again and
again and again, and they just keep rebuilding them; they move to
another place and rebuild. I find that really fascinating and really
inspiring.

LA: I remember reading a piece you wrote about a talk you gave on a
panel about the transmission of trauma. It involved an incident with a
Turkish psychologist who denied the existence of any genocide. You
said you weren’t someone who clings to victimhood as identity, yet the
truth couldn’t be stolen from you in the name of dialogue. You’re the
granddaughter of genocide survivors – can you explain the transmission
of trauma?

NK: It’s this idea that you grow up with these stories that are being
told to you – you grow up with these traumatic experiences and a lot of
them are unspoken – that are somehow transmitted to the next generation.
There’s a line in Zabelle where Zabelle says something like: `we
didn’t speak of those times, but they were like dead and rotting
animals behind the walls of our house.’ So it is this idea that there
is this terrible smell that is somehow permeating the air, and you
don’t even have to talk about it, but it is transmitted and it is felt
and it is known.

LA: You got involved with Code Pink: Women for Peace right before the
war in Iraq started. You have attended demonstrations and organized
local and national campaigns – there are a lot of great photos of you
holding signs that say `Love troops, not the War’ – and coordinating the
Stolen Beauty Campaign, which boycotts Ahava Cosmetics, whose products
come from natural resources in the West Bank. What has your experience
been like with Code Pink?

NK: One of the things that Code Pink has done successfully is
amplifying the voices of women who have come from places where US wars
and occupations are taking place. So we have brought women over from
Iraq and Afghanistan. We helped organize a book tour for Afghan
parliamentarian Malalai Joya (for her book A Woman Among Warlords),
where I hosted her at our apartment for a few nights. We have worked
with Jewish Voice for Peace in organizing a tour for two young Israeli
women who had been jailed for refusing service in the Israeli army; we
hosted them and went to a number of their events and they were
houseguests too. I loved doing that, being around them hearing their
stories and amplifying their voices, which you don’t hear in the
mainstream media.

http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/15784/proverbs-politics-and-paris_an-interview-with-nanc

L’Union douanière ne menace pas l’indépendance de l’Arménie

DIPLOMATIE
L’Union douanière ne menace pas l’indépendance de l’Arménie

L’adhésion à l’union douanière des anciennes républiques soviétiques
dirigée par la Russie ne compromet pas l’indépendance nationale et la
souveraineté de l’Arménie, a insisté jeudi le Parti républicain du
président Serge Sarkissian (HHK).

Eduard Sharmazanov , le porte-parole du HHK , a établi des parallèles
entre l’Union européenne et l’alliance commerciale de la Russie avec
la Biélorussie et le Kazakhstan que Moscou veut agrandir et
transformer en une Union économique eurasienne en janvier 2015. «
Lorsque l’Allemagne, la France, l’Italie, la Grèce ou la Bulgarie ont
rejoint l’Union européenne, ont-ils perdu leur souveraineté ? ` a fait
valoir Sharmazanov lors d’une conférence de presse.

Sarkissian a de même rejeté les critiques sur le risque sérieux de
perte de l’indépendance de l’Arménie. « Il y a une chose qui ne peut
pas changer quelque soit la situation : la souveraineté de la
République d’Arménie, » a déclaré le président le 21 septembre lors
des célébrations officielles de la Journée de l’indépendance de
l’Arménie.

Les groupes d’opposition et civiques arméniens ont depuis continué à
exprimer de graves préoccupations au sujet de l’échec de Sarkissian à
résister à ce qu’ils considèrent comme un plan du Kremlin pour recréer
l’Union soviétique. Certains critiques ont également mis en garde l’
impact négatif que cette adhésion pourrait avoir sur le contrôle
arménien sur le Haut- Karabakh. Ils craignent qu’Erevan soit forcé de
taxer les biens importés du Karabakh après avoir rejoint l’Union
douanière.

Le président du Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev a alimenté ces
craintes mardi en reposant la question de l’absence de postes de
contrôle douanier aux frontières de l’Arménie avec la République
autoproclamée du Haut-Karabakh. Il a dit que c’est la raison pour
laquelle il avait exprimé des réserves lors de la signature d’une «
feuille de route » pour l’adhésion de l’Arménie à l’union.

Sharmazanov, qui est aussi vice-président du Parlement arménien, a
minimisé les craintes de Nazarbayev et les attribue à des liens
étroits avec l’Azerbaïdjan Kazakhstan. « M. Nazarbaïev a signé la
feuille de route. Aucun autre document n’a été présenté par la partie
kazakhe », a-t-il dit.

Sharmazanov a insisté sur le fait que l’entrée arménienne dans le bloc
commercial n’aura pas de répercussion sur le conflit Karabakh. «
L’union douanière est une union économique, pas politique, » selon
lui. « Les questions politiques ne sont donc pas discutées là-bas. »

dimanche 29 décembre 2013,
Ara ©armenews.com

Armenia to Reform Detention Rules

Institute for War and Peace Reporting, UK
IWPR Caucasus Reporting #717
Dec 28 2013

Armenia to Reform Detention Rules

Government plans to reduce use of custody orders for suspects awaiting trial.
By Mariana Ghahramanyan – Caucasus
CRS Issue 717,
28 Dec 13

Despite agreement that pre-trial detention is used far too much in
Armenia, the practice continues. Now the government is drafting
changes to the law that will offer alternatives to incarceration.

International rights groups have repeatedly raised concerns about the
indiscriminate use of detention ahead of trial, and the knock-on
effects on prison overcrowding.

State prosecutors invariably ask for suspects to be kept in custody
regardless of the nature or gravity of the alleged crime, and judges
generally agree to such requests. (See Cavalier Use of Custody in
Armenia on the practice.)

Lawyer Nikolay Baghdasaryan says pre-trial detention is not used for
want of other options, but because it is seen as a good way of
encouraging suspects to confess.

In one recent high-profile case that focused attention on the issue,
Baghdasaryan defended actor Vardan Petrosyan, who was charged with
causing death by dangerous driving after an accident on October 20 in
which two young men were killed.

Baghdasaryan said the court’s decision to place his client in custody
pending trial was unjustified, since none of the three criteria for
doing so had been met. These would apply in the event that a suspect
tried to evade arrest, was likely to interfere with the investigation,
or had no health problems. None was true in Petrosyan’s case, the
lawyer said.

`I don’t know why the court broke the law, but it did,’ Baghdasaryan told IWPR.

He appealed against the custody ruling in a higher court, but without success.

Edmon Marukyan, a former human rights activist and now an independent
member of parliament, said the Petrosyan case opened a lot of people’s
eyes to the excessive use of detention.

`The alternative methods of restraint which we have in the current
legal code are barely used in criminal cases in Armenia,’ he told
IWPR. `In 95 per cent of criminal cases the courts approve the
prosecution request for the suspect to be kept in detention.’

A spokesman for the judicial system, Arsen Babayan, disputed that
figure. He said that of the 3,200 individuals charged in January-June
2013, only 820 were ordered to be detained pending trial. Babayan said
this meant that only 26 per cent of individuals charged were held in
detention, not 95 per cent as Baghdasaryan claimed.

Nevertheless, Baghdasaryan insisted that pre-trial custody was
over-used and that courts were far from consistent in the way they
applied it.

The office of Armenia’s official human rights ombudsman agrees there
is a problem.

`Pre-trial detention is sometimes accompanied by violations of the
presumption of innocence,’ Yeranuhi Tumanyan, an adviser to the
ombudsman, told IWPR. `Holding a suspect in detention must not be used
as a form of punishment, and must only be used when absolutely
necessary.’

The government is now considering amendments to the penal code to
allow suspects to be subject to restrictions that do not include
imprisonment.

`We don’t have alternative mechanisms of restraint,’ Justice Minister
Hrayr Tovmasyan told parliament on December 18. `House arrest and
administrative [restraints] will be introduced in the new code. Once
they are in force, we will significantly reduce the burden on
detention facilities.

`We will use detention as a last resort if all other forms of
restraint are not suitable.’

Mariana Ghahramanyan is a correspondent for Armnews.am.

http://iwpr.net/report-news/armenia-reform-detention-rules

Switzerland to raise trust between Azerbaijan and Armenia as OSCE ch

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
dec 28 2013

Switzerland to raise trust between Azerbaijan and Armenia as OSCE chair

28 December 2013 – 1:42pm

As the new chair of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe (OSCE) Switzerland is going to raise trust between Azerbaijan
and Armenia, Swiss Federal Foreign Minister Didier Burkhalter says.

The country is also going to support Minsk Group efforts to improve
the situation in the region and encourage the development of the civil
society, the minister is quoted as saying by Trend.

Government approves master plan stipulating $101 million for Zvartno

TendersInfo
December 27, 2013 Friday

Armenia : Government approves master plan stipulating $ 101 million
for ZVARTNOTS airport developments

The government of Armenia sanctioned a master plan presented by the
concessioner – Armenia International Airports CJSC requiring for a $
101,l million in the construction of Zvartnots airport within the next
5 years.

Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan appreciated the move, mentioning that
the money spent will enable enhancing the quality of the
airport-provided facilities and building tourism in Armenia.

The head of the General Department of Civil Aviation (GDCA) Artem
Movsisyan, in turn, listed a number of enhancements envisioned in the
master plan, also covering the topic of a free economic zone.

Mentioning to the old terminal of the airport, Movsisyan recommended
that a new solution must be found.

He said, Creation of an architectural park featuring monuments that
used to symbolize the Armenian capital was one of the ideas,
mentioning a Brussels-located Mini Europe park as an example.Copyright
© Euclid Infotech Pvt. Ltd.

ANKARA: ‘Calling 1915 Inhumane Helps Turkey, Armenia’

“CALLING 1915 INHUMANE HELPS TURKEY, ARMENIA”

Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
Dec 27 2013

Cansu CamlıbelNİCE / Hurriyet

A key figure behind the reconciliation efforts between Turkey and
Armenia says Foreign Minister Davutoglu’s statement calling 1915
deportation of Armenians inhumane was very important

Samson Ozararat, a key figure behind the scenes on reconciliation
efforts between Turkey and Armenia, said Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet
Davutoglu’s statement calling 1915 deportation of Armenians inhumane
was very important. But he argued Armenia has lost confidence in
Turkey, following the failure to approve the protocols that would lead
to normalization, due to what he said was a change in Ankara’s policy.

An Armenian from Turkey’s central Anatolian province of Konya,
Ozararat has been one of the key figures in every effort to move
Turkey and Armenia closer in the last 20 years.

Born as a Turkish Armenian, he was expelled from Turkish citizenship.

Thereafter, he became Armenia’s representative in the Organization
of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation’s (BSEC) Istanbul headquarters.

Ozararat, who is now a French citizen and lives in the French city of
Nice, received a call from the Turkish Foreign Ministry two weeks ago.

He was invited to Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu’s plane
to accompany him on a trip to Yerevan. The official reason for
Davutoglu’s visit was to attend the BSEC summit. However, Ankara was
actually trying to test the ground to see whether there was room for
maneuvers to re-generate a new process to normalize ties with Armenia.

Ozararat said he tried to initiate occasions for dialogue between
the two countries in the past. “When there are no relations between
two countries, people like myself become helpful in providing back
channels of communication. Actually no one or country has given me
a duty. I have friends and a good network in both countries that I
try to mobilize my relations with them in a positive manner to start
up dialogue. I believe every opportunity has to be seized to bring
people together. And I try to initiate such occasions,” he said.

Milestones

He emphasized four milestones in bringing the countries together. “We
have come a long way in discussing the conflict. However, the barriers
that put us apart tend to shift as the world changes. In the past,
there was this nationalist approach that was dominating the political
arena due to fabricated fears from Communism. Then came the time when
fears around ‘Armenia will claim land (from Turkey)’ were pumped.

Despite all these, there have been milestones in bringing the two
countries together.

The first one is the meeting between the Turkish far-right nationalist
leader Alparslan TurkeÅ~_ and the then Armenian President Levon
Ter-Petrosyan. Another is the conference that was planned, but could
not be held at Bogazici University. Another is the apology campaign.

Another is the football diplomacy.

(Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan and Turkish President Abdullah Gul
exchanging visits.) These were all steps that melted the ice somehow.”

Ozararat said Davutoglu’s statements on the way to Yerevan were
very important. Davutoglu said the forced deportation of Armenians
during Ottoman rule was unacceptable and inhumane. “Maybe it sounds
quite normal to hear this today. I knew Davutoglu’s views on 1915
before from our personal conversations. However, we have never heard
similar things from an official until this day. The fact that he stated
these views publicly as the Turkish foreign minister is a huge step,
I believe. It is a part of history now,” he said.

Nationalist rhetoric barrier

Ozararat said Armenia lost confidence in Turkey since 2009. “In the
past, the nationalist rhetoric was the barrier. Today, it is the
economic and diplomatic balances. Azerbaijan is one of the major
sources of Turkish energy needs. Moreover, Turkey understandably
has to consider the interests of Turkish businessmen who invest in
Azerbaijan. These are the reasons why Prime Minister Erdogan had to
change the policy on May 13, 2009 which he declared during his speech
at the Azerbaijan Parliament.

Since that day, Armenia’s trust in Turkey was broken. Honestly, prior
to Davutoglu’s trip to Yerevan this time I could not find a single
person in Armenia who favored a new start for bilateral talks. Not
a single person from the government or opposition parties. Trust is
gone,” Ozararat said, adding the most important thing still is to keep
the communication channels open. “First and foremost, one has to stop
saying ‘nothing happened in the past.’ Thank god, this approach has
been somehow left behind in Turkey. Getting rid of this rhetoric is
part of the cure. Now we can look for ways and occasions to create
empathy from both sides. If one day, the memorial in Yerevan could
be visited…In the end, that monument is the symbolic grave for one
and a half million Ottoman Armenians. Why would a Turkish official
not visit that monument one day? Turkey’s top officials have been
offering to give me my Turkish citizenship back,” he said. “My dream
is to get the citizenship of both Turkey and Armenia on the same
day after normalization of relations between two countries. Maybe it
sounds like a fantasy today. But I say what if it happens…”

December/27/2013

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/calling-1915-inhumane-helps-turkey-armenia.aspx?pageID=238&nID=60194&NewsCatID=338

Azerbaijan Against Armenia’s Accession To Customs Union Before Karab

AZERBAIJAN AGAINST ARMENIA’S ACCESSION TO CUSTOMS UNION BEFORE KARABAKH PROBLEM SETTLED

Kyiv Post, Ukraine
Dec 27 2013

Print version
Dec. 27, 2013, 6:46 p.m. | Ukraine – by Interfax-Ukraine

Baku – Baku is against Yerevan’s accession to the
Belarusian-Kazakh-Russian Customs Union before Armenia withdraws
its armed forces from the occupied Azeri territories and before
Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity is restored, Ali Hasanov, the chief
of the public policy department at the Azeri presidential secretariat,
told Azeri media.

“It would be against international law principles if Armenia, a
country that has occupied native Azeri lands, such as Nagorno-Karabakh
and seven adjacent districts, joins any union or association,”
Hasanov said.

“It is commonly known that relevant resolutions and decisions by the
UN, the OSCE and other authoritative international organizations have
confirmed the fact of the occupation of Azerbaijan’s territories by
Armenia and demanded unambiguously that the territories occupied by
the aggressor country be freed. Therefore, Armenia’s accession to
the Customs Union or any other similar body is possible only after
the liberation of the occupied Azeri lands,” he said.

Otherwise, at the moment of Armenia’s accession to any union, its
territory and borders will violate international jurisdiction because
of the violation of Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity, he said.

“Either this state has to officially make a claim on the occupied
territories and the structures it enters have to accept this, or
it should return these lands and become a member of new unions with
territories endorsed within the UN framework,” Hasanov said.

https://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/azerbaijan-against-armenias-accession-to-customs-union-before-karabakh-problem-settled-334350.html

Iran President Hails Role Of Iranian Armenians In War With Iraq, Rev

IRAN PRESIDENT HAILS ROLE OF IRANIAN ARMENIANS IN WAR WITH IRAQ, REVOLUTION

Tasnim news agency , Iran
dec 26 2013

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani has described the role of Iranian
Armenians in the Iran-Iraq war as important.

“Religious minorities played a very important role in the Islamic
Revolution and during the Sacred Defence. The presence of Iranian
Armenian veterans in the Iran-Iraq war showed that Iranians have
always been together and support each other, especially in difficult
times. And this is a lesson for the world and especially those in some
countries who are at war with each other due to ethnic and religious
differences,” the news agency quoted Rouhani as saying at a meeting
with families of Armenian “martyrs” and veterans held on 25 December
in Tehran.

Rouhani also hailed the turnout of Iranian Armenians in the
presidential election on 14 June and wished them a year full of
blessings and joy.

[Translated from Persian]

Agricultural Output Drops In Armenia

AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT DROPS IN ARMENIA

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Dec 26 2013

26 December 2013 – 1:31pm

Growth of tomatoes halved in Armenia and growth of peaches and
eggplants dropped by 40%, while fields for growing cereals and forage
increased, said Grach Berberyan, Chairman of the Agrarian and Peasant
Association of Armenia, Armenia Today reports.

He noted that a lot of the harvest was destroyed by hail in 2013. The
official said that farmers needed support in protecting plants
from hail.

Growth of tomatoes halved in Armenia and growth of peaches and
eggplants dropped by 40%, while fields for growing cereals and forage
increased, said Grach Berberyan, Chairman of the Agrarian and Peasant
Association of Armenia, Armenia Today reports.

He noted that a lot of the harvest was destroyed by hail in 2013. The
official said that farmers needed support in protecting plants
from hail.