James Warlick: Success of peace over Karabakh depends on sides, not

James Warlick: Success of peace over Karabakh depends on sides, not co-chairs

13:06 * 24.05.14

The success or failure of the peace process over Nagorno-Karabakh
depends on the political will of the sides, not on any one member of
the Minsk Group, according to the US co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group.

James Warlick made the statement in an interview with the the
Azerbaijani news agency APA, as he addressed the future of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement talks.

The diplomat said he would look forward to working with his Russian
and French colleagues to continue bringing new ideas to the table and
helping the sides find their way into real negotiations on a peace
agreement.

Asked about his Twitter post suggesting the joint use of the Sarsang
reservoir’s water resources, Mr Warlick replied,

“The Sarsang reservoir represents an opportunity: people on both sides
of the Line of Contact could work together to have an immediate,
positive impact on those living in areas affected by this conflict. A
mutually acceptable solution would address demand for reliable
electricity and irrigation water, just as it did before the conflict
began. We continue to support any measures that could reduce tensions
and begin restoring trust between the sides.”

The OSCE Minsk Group, composed of US, French and Russian co-chairs,
has been spearheading the peace efforts over Nagorno-Karabakh since
1992.

Armenian News – Tert.am

Hovik Abrahamyan: From now on, Samvel Aleksanyan will work without a

Hovik Abrahamyan: From now on, Samvel Aleksanyan will work without a hitch

by Tatevik Shahunyan

Saturday, May 24, 13:10

Prime Minister Hovik Abrahamyan told journalists before the 15th
congress of RPA that a businessman-deputy from the Republican Party of
Armenia, Samvel Alekdanyan, promised him from now on to work in the
tax field,

He also added that during the meeting with Armenian businessmen,
Aleksanyan said that he is ready to work without a hitch and join the
tax field only in case if all the businessmen do the same. “I don’t
care what was before that, I am interested in what will be in future,
that is to say, all the businessmen should work in the tax field”, –
the premier said.

Deputy of the National Assembly Nikol Pashinyan said in the parliament
on 16 May that according to the official data, in Q1 2014, Armenia,
i.e. the Akhuryan Sugar Plant owned by Samvel Alexanyan, MP from the
ruling Republican Party of Armenia, produced 0 kg of sugar. Instead,
30 thsd of raw sugar was imported to Armenia. “This means that the
businessman-parliamentarian Alexanyan and his plant have made a deal
with the Government and import sugar to Armenia under the guise of raw
sugar, because a 10% customs duty is imposed on sugar and 0% on raw
sugar. What has happened? It has turned out that with a subtle motion
of the hand the Government and the oligarchs close to the Government
have earned 2.9 mln USD at the expense of the state budget. No one
minds Samvel Alexanyan, Serzh Sargsyan and Hovik Abrahamyan’s being so
subtle to earn millions in this manner. The problem is that they are
doing it at the expense of the citizens. We are against such criminal
practices against the citizens”, said Pashinyan. Pashinyan believes
that if the Government strives to combat shadow economy, it must not
create shadow economy itself.

Ë8B9590-E323-11E3-916D0EB7C0D21663

http://www.arminfo.am/index.cfm?objectid

La Turquie en Europe, c’est maintenant

Une tribune de Nicolas Dupont-Aignan
La Turquie en Europe, c’est maintenant

C’est dans un silence médiatique gêné, pour ne pas dire assourdissant,
que Cecilia Malmström, Commissaire européen aux affaires intérieures,
a signé le 16 décembre dernier un accord prévoyant la libre
circulation des Turcs sans visa dans l’Union européenne à partir de
l’été 2017.

Pourtant, cela fait maintenant plus de 10 ans que l’on explique par le
menu aux Français que l’entrée de la Turquie dans l’UE n’est pas
certaine, que négociations ne valent pas adhésion, qu’Ankara devra se
conformer à des conditions tellement strictes qu’elles en rendent
aléatoire l’issue finale du processus.

Mais aujourd’hui les masques sont tombés : avant même que les
négociations soient achevées, avant même qu’elles aient été ouvertes
dans plus de 20 “chapitres” (comme on dit à Bruxelles)[1], la Turquie
bénéficiera d’ici trois ans d’une faculté majeure pourtant réservée en
priorité aux membres de l’UE. Allez ensuite lui expliquer que son
adhésion n’est pas acquise… Bref, malgré le baratin des bonnes mes
européennes qui nous gouvernent à Paris et à Bruxelles, la Turquie…
c’est maintenant !

“Grande avancée” entend-on dans les arcanes de la Commission, car la
Turquie va devoir en échange ré-admettre les étrangers en situation
irrégulière parvenus jusqu’en Europe en passant par son sol. Mais que
vaut cette prétendue avancée face à la réalité de l’Europe-passoire et
d’une Turquie, plaque tournante migratoire du Moyen-Orient, qui a par
ailleurs des règles de naturalisation pour le moins fantaisistes ?
Rien bien sûr…

Les partis politiques “de gouvernement”, qui sollicitent aujourd’hui
le suffrage des Français pour les élections du 25 mai, ont une
responsabilité écrasante dans ce fiasco qui annoncent, pour les
peuples et pour l’Europe, de terribles lendemains. Le Parti
socialiste, tout d’abord, aveuglé par son éternelle fausse générosité,
qui a toujours appelé de ses voeux cette adhésion, au nom de
“l’ouverture d’esprit et de la tolérance”. Laurent Fabius, ministre
des Affaires étrangères, a ainsi officiellement annoncé la relance du
processus de négociation le 12 février 2013, ce qui a abouti à
l’ouverture d’un nouveau chapitre (“politique régionale et
coordination des instruments structurels”) le 5 novembre de la même
année. Mais l’UMP est tout aussi coupable, lui qui a rendu possible la
ratification en France de l’adhésion turque par la voie parlementaire
– concurremment à la voie référendaire – lors de la réforme
constitutionnelle de 2008, et dont le candidat à la Commission
européenne, Jean-Claude Juncker, a encore réaffirmé à Berlin le 5
avril dernier que les négociations avec Ankara “devaient se
poursuivre” – en vue de leur conclusion positive, naturellement…

Mais cela n’empêche nullement les caciques de l’UMP, leurs candidats
au Parlement européen en tête, de continuer à répéter en boucle que
“jamais, au grand jamais” ils ne laisseront faire. Naturellement, ils
n’iront pas crier sur les toits qu’ils votent régulièrement, avec
leurs collègues eurodéputés du PS, les crédits de “préadhésion” de la
Turquie à l’UE, ces quelque 4,8 milliards d’euros généreusement
déversés ces sept dernières années sans contrôle sérieux vers Ankara
pour “l’aider” à concrétiser les réformes réclamées par les
eurocrates. Et dire que la France, qui présente par ailleurs un solde
financier négatif de 8 milliards d’euros par an avec l’Union
européenne, doit trouver dans l’heure 50 milliards d’euros d’économie
pour ne pas être mise au coin !

Seule la création d’un partenariat avec la Turquie, de même qu’avec
l’Ukraine, la Russie et le Maghreb, pourra mettre un terme définitif
au fatal engrenage et enfin régulariser nos relations avec nos voisins
de l’Europe. C’est ce que je préconise invariablement depuis 10 ans,
avec l’établissement d’une Europe des coopérations volontaristes entre
nations libres, meilleure garantie contre tous les élargissements
incontrôlés. C’est ce que défendront les futurs élus au Parlement
européen des listes “Debout la France, ni système, ni extrêmes !” qui
solliciteront, dans la clarté et la franchise, les suffrages des
Français le 25 mai.

Nicolas Dupont-Aignan

Nicolas Dupont-Aignan préside Debout la République, parti politique se
revendiquant du gaullisme et est l’auteur de L’euro, l’arnaque du
siècle, Ed. du Rocher.

Read more at

[1]Sur les 35 chapitres des négociations, 14 ont été ouverts dont un
conclu : “libre circulation des capitaux”, “droit des sociétés”,
“droits de propriété intellectuelle”, “société de l’information et
médias”, “sécurité alimentaire, politique vétérinaire et
phytosanitaire”, “fiscalité”, “statistiques”, “politique d’entreprise
et politique industrielle”, “réseaux transeuropéens”, “politique
régionale et coordination des instruments structurels”, “science et
recherche” (le seul conclu), “environnement”, “protection des
consommateurs et de la santé”, “contrôle financier”.

Read more at

samedi 24 mai 2014,
Stéphane (c)armenews.com

http://www.atlantico.fr/decryptage/turquie-en-europe-c-est-maintenant-nicolas-dupont-aignan-1577830.html#C3GAQ1HBQrC2xiwB.99
http://www.atlantico.fr/decryptage/turquie-en-europe-c-est-maintenant-nicolas-dupont-aignan-1577830.html#C3GAQ1HBQrC2xiwB.99
http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=100171

Envoi d’un container de matériel médical vers l’Arménie

MARSEILLE-ARMENIE
Envoi d’un container de matériel médical vers l’Arménie

Dans la continuité des engagements pris par le Maire de Marseille lors
de sa dernière mission officielle à Yerevan en octobre dernier, du
matériel médical a été collecté par l’association Chène, avec
l’infatigable Ferdinand Gracian ainsi que Gérard Babayan qui ont
notamment collecté 220 fauteuils roulants. Destination Yerevan avec
l’association Pyunic pour l’insertion des personnes handicapées et
l’hôpital Sourp Astvadzadzine de Yerevan avec lequel l’Assistance
Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille a passé une convention en octobre
2013. Didier Parakian, Adjoint au Maire chargé de l’Economie et
Colette Babouchian conseillère déléguée se sont mobilisés également
pour cette action humanitaire en prenant part activement à la collecte
des fauteurs roulants et autres matériels. La Ville de Marseille
prenant en charge le transport vers l’Arménie.

Krikor Amirzayan

samedi 24 mai 2014,
Krikor Amirzayan (c)armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=100159

BAKU: Obama Says Azerbaijan, U.S. Enjoy Strong Security Cooperation

OBAMA SAYS AZERBAIJAN, U.S. ENJOY STRONG SECURITY COOPERATION

AzerNews, Azerbaijan
May 23 2014

23 May 2014, 11:18 (GMT+05:00)
By Nazrin Gadimova

U.S President Barack Obama sent a letter of congratulation to his
Azerbaijani counterpart Ilham Aliyev on May 22.

“On behalf of the U.S people and myself, I express you and the
Azerbaijani people my best wishes on the occasion of Republic Day,”
the letter says.

“We join the Azerbaijani people, celebrating the historical holiday on
the occasion of declaring May 28, 1918 as independence of the first
secular and democratic country in the Muslim world – the Republic of
Azerbaijan,” Obama said in his letter.

The U.S. president further stressed that the two countries have strong
security cooperation.

“We appreciate Azerbaijan’s participation in the NATO mission in
Afghanistan. The two countries have recently established close
partnership in the energy sector. We appreciate the signing of
the final investment decision as part of the Southern Gas Corridor
in December 2013. We urge Azerbaijan to assume a leading role in
protecting human rights and fundamental freedoms. We are also ready
to assist Azerbaijan in achieving progress in the peaceful settlement
of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. This will significantly contribute
to stronger, stable and independent Azerbaijan we want it to be.

“I once again congratulate the Azerbaijani people, having rich culture
and history, on the national holiday,” the U.S. president said in
his letter.

Azerbaijan will celebrate Republic Day on May 28, the 96th anniversary
of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic, which is an historic date
marking the establishment of the first secular democratic state of
the Islamic world.

During the 23-month-long activity, the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic
managed to achieve great success and even during the 70-year Soviet
period the Azerbaijani nation was able to preserve its national and
spiritual values.

Kazakhstan, Armenia Sign Agreement In Cooperation On Civil Service

KAZAKHSTAN, ARMENIA SIGN AGREEMENT IN COOPERATION ON CIVIL SERVICE

AKIpress News Agency (Kyrgyzstan)
May 22, 2014 Thursday

Chairman of the Agency for Civil Service Affairs Alikhan Baimenov
met with the Chairman of the Civil Service of the Republic of Armenia
Manvel Badalyan to discuss questions of bilateral cooperation between
Kazakhstan and Armenia, the press service of the Kazakhstani Agency
reported May 21.

Following the meeting the sides signed a memorandum of understanding in
the field of public service, involving meetings of experts, exchange of
knowledge and participation in the activities of the public service,
the development and organization of vocational education and training
for government officials of the two countries.

Manvel Badalyan noted great interest in studying the experience of
civil service reform in Kazakhstan, in particular the introduction
of the Corps A.

My Father’s Deepest Sorrow

MY FATHER’S DEEPEST SORROW;

Palm Beach Post (Florida)
May 22, 2014 Thursday

Losing his family in the Armenian genocide cast dark shadows across
my dad’s life and, surprisingly, my own.

By Douglas Kalajian Special to The Palm Beach Post

When I was 8, I watched my father break down in tears as a man on
television spoke about the long-ago massacres of Armenians in their
native land. Dad ran out of the room and I ran to my mother.

She told me his mother was among the many killed but warned me never
to ask him about that or anything else about his childhood. “It’s
too sad,” she said.

>From that moment, I felt I’d been born in midair carrying the
unbearable weight of a history I could never fully know or understand.

Over the years, as my mother shared what little more she knew about
my father’s early life, it became clear her directive was rooted in
experience. She had been tiptoeing around any topic that would invoke
my father’s deepest sorrows since they met as teenagers when he came
to America in 1928.

I never wanted to make my father cry, so I never violated her orders —
at least not directly. But whenever the opportunity presented itself,
I’d approach the topic obliquely and cautiously. If he responded at
all, my father often shared only a scrap or two before changing the
subject. It was left to me to figure out the importance of each scrap,
and to connect it to whatever had come before or after.

This is how my lifelong conversation with my father continued,
yielding scattered pieces of a puzzle I’m still trying to complete
more than 20 years after his death.

What I know for certain is that Nishan Kalajian was born in a
wonderful place at an awful time. Diyarbakir, Turkey, had been our
family’s home as far back as anyone could trace. Armenians and Turks
had lived separate but inseparable lives there for centuries along
the fertile banks of the Tigris River. Armenians called the ancient,
walled city Dikranagerd, honoring their most glorious king.

When my father was born in 1912, Diyarbakir sat at the core of
an imploding Ottoman Empire whose rulers blamed their miseries on
subjects who were simply too different from the rest. Within a few
years, the regime embarked on a campaign to eliminate the empire’s
historic population of Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks.

By the time my father was 3 years old, he lost his mother, his home
and everything familiar before being cast into the world alone. I
desperately wanted to know more: How he survived, how he kept his
wits and his faith, how he moved forward without being consumed by
bitterness and hate.

He volunteered none of it.

The Armenian Genocide was the defining reality of his life, yet he
would not talk about it. He dealt with his most painful memories in
a most Armenian way, by pushing them aside.

In the end, I think he wanted to tell me the rest. He probably told
me more during the last year of his life than he had in all the years
before, or it may just seem that way because he told me at least a few
stories that illuminated the others. We certainly talked more because
we spent more time alone together once my mother was gone. I know
that losing her also jarred loose the memories of all the previous
losses and traumas of his life.

But by then, it was too late for him to change entirely. His occasional
anecdotes were still as maddening in their brevity as they were
tantalizing in their revelations.

For years I obsessed about the missing pieces of his story, but
I’ve come to appreciate the value of what I did learn. I also came
to understand the story is as much mine as my father’s because
his silence became my challenge, making it all the more difficult
to accept a complex cultural inheritance and to understand my own
identity as an American of Armenian descent.

So in spite of the many questions that remained, I sifted through my
own memories and whatever papers and photos my father left behind,
and wrote “Stories My Father Never Finished Telling Me,” from which
the following excerpt is taken. I wrote it for my daughter and her
generation.

I hope they can figure out what to do with that unbearable weight of
history. Maybe they can figure out how to let it go and stop the fall
without losing all the wonderful parts of our inheritance.

My mother was born in Chelsea, Massachusetts, a tough little city of
immigrants across the Mystic River from Boston.

She grew up speaking Armenian in a house where everyone spoke
Armenian. Her parents named her Zavart, which means “glad.” No one
at the hospital bothered to ask how to spell it. Someone simply typed
the name Martha on her birth certificate.

When Zavart/Martha turned five, her father asked a waitress at the
restaurant where he worked as a cook to take her to school. The
waitress registered her as Sylvia. That’s the name that stuck. As an
adult, my mother always signed her name Sylvia Z. Kalajian. It was
a perfect compromise for someone who had to straddle the worlds of
her immigrant parents and her American friends.

She was still straddling when I, her only child, came along a few
weeks before her fortieth birthday. Instinctively, my mother trained
me to straddle, too, but it was years before I realized it.

I believed my father when he told me I was an American, period, just
like him. He always spoke about America in the first person plural.

This was our country, and we were Americans above all. He understood
America better than my mother did, maybe better than I ever will,
because he wasn’t born here. I knew this because my mother told me
he was born in Armenia. I didn’t hear it from him.

He hated the word immigrant, probably because he’d heard it used
as something other than a compliment when he first arrived, but he
loved the idea that an immigrant could become an American without an
asterisk. An American is an American, he insisted, no matter where
he was born.

I found out much later in life that America wasn’t his first choice.

When it became impossible to remain where he was born, he found refuge
in Greece. He thought about moving on to Egypt, or France. Coming to
America was not quite serendipitous, but it was certainly a fortunate
turn of events.

“If I’d gone to those other places, I’d always be an outsider,”
he told me. “You might become a citizen, but you can’t become a
Frenchman or an Arab. Here, I’m an American.”

What a marvelous discovery for a man whose country vanished nearly six
hundred years before he was born. He could become an American so he
did, but he never melted. He never lost his language or his culture,
never forgot his history, never changed his name or tried to hide
his origin.

He never doubted he could be completely Armenian and completely
American at once and without conflict.

He was unwilling to risk any ambiguity where I was concerned, however.

He insisted I have an unmistakably American name, Douglas, after Gen.

Douglas MacArthur. But that still left me straddling a cultural fault
line, and trying to find my footing made me more eager to learn about
the side of the world my father came from.

Mom remained much easier to talk to, however, and her everyday
interests were more like mine.

Most nights, Mom and I would watch television together. She liked
comedies: “I Love Lucy.” “The Beverly Hillbillies.” “Ozzie and
Harriet.”

Mom and I watched our silly shows while my father sat in the same
room, reading. He had headphones so he could listen to Chopin while
we giggled. My father would sit in his rocking chair upholstered in
gray cloth that was embroidered with a big, stylized, maroon “K,”
but he didn’t rock. He sat very still, peering into his books.

Once in a while, when I was very lucky and got his attention just as
he was settling down to read, he’d talk to me about Armenia but only
the Armenia of long ago. He described a place of unfathomable beauty
and endless tragedy, invaded and eviscerated time and again.

I learned to listen carefully. When Dad decided he was done, no matter
whether the story was just beginning or in the middle or almost at
the end, he stopped talking and returned to his books–and there was
no bringing him back.

For all my father told me about Armenia’s past, the Genocide of 1915
was the one subject he couldn’t talk about or even listen to someone
else talk about. Sometimes he’d start and then just get up and walk
out of the room. Other times, he’d change the subject. But he told me
a little now and then, mostly when he didn’t have time to think first,
when something made him angry or sad or brought back some feeling I
could never understand.

I know this was my father’s way of dealing with pain, but I also
suspect Dad was purposely blurring the borders of his own memories
to obscure the seams between his harsh, early life as a Near Eastern
refugee and his new and cherished identity as an American businessman
and proud veteran. It was almost demanded by his ideal of becoming
and remaining perfectly American and perfectly Armenian at once
and indivisibly.

Many of the old people I remember were like my father, editing
their life stories or simply avoiding all talk of the time and place
where they lost so much. It is completely understandable but no less
unfortunate. It was a loss to the world, which might have learned
something.

It’s only in the past few years that Armenians have started to talk
out loud and in public about the Genocide. The survivors themselves
are nearly all dead, but a few smart people had the good sense and
courage to ask the old folks one last time to speak into a microphone,
or at least speak slowly while they took notes. I’ve listened to
recordings and read transcripts, but there is only one story that
could have stopped my fall, and it is too late for me to hear it.

For years now, on the many nights when I can’t sleep, I get out of
bed and sit in Dad’s rocking chair. It has been reupholstered three
or four times, but the gracefully curved and lacquered arms with
their carved goose heads are the same. I run my hands over them and
picture my father sitting there, looking as he did when he died,
still paratrooper trim at seventy-seven. His hair was still black
except for a gentle, distinguished brush of gray at each temple,
and still full except for a pronounced cock’s peak up front and a
palm-sized bald patch at the rear, which he never acknowledged.

I think about him and all the reading he did in that chair. I take
one of his books or a photo album off the shelf and I look for pieces
of the puzzle that was his life and my heritage.

This is not a mystic quest. I have not been searching for the meaning
of life, or even for the meaning of my father’s life. I just wanted
to know a little more about him and about his family, and about my
mother and her family. I wanted to know about these Armenians and
their long, difficult journey.

I hoped if I learned enough about them, I might uncover a clue to why
I cry when I hear songs sung in a language I cannot understand. Or
why I get angry about things I can do nothing about because they
happened long before I was born. Or why I sit up night after night
thinking about people I never met and never will meet because they
are long dead.

I am not a historian, and this is not a book of facts and dates and
sober analysis. This is a story told by a man born in midair whose
only hope for a good night’s sleep is to close his fingers around
the frayed cord of history and tug with all his might.

THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

Beginning in roughly 1914, the Ottoman government of what is now
modern-day Turkey began a campaign to eradicate all citizens of
Armenian, Greek and Assyrian descent, through massacres, forced
labor and death marches. An estimated 3.5 million people died between
1914-1923, and those who survived scattered throughout the world. It
was considered the first genocide of modern times.

Author Douglas Kalajian is a retired journalist who worked as a writer
and editor for The Palm Beach Post. He lives west of Boynton Beach
with his wife, Robyn. This excerpt comes from “Stories My Father
Never Finished Telling Me: Living With The Armenian Legacy Of Loss

And Silence.” The book can be ordered in print and Kindle editions
from Amazon.com.

http://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/lifestyles/my-fathers-deepest-sorrow-a-first-person-occasiona/nfzWx/

Republican MP Insults Tert.Am Journalists

REPUBLICAN MP INSULTS TERT.AM JOURNALISTS

11:15 * 23.05.14

After the debate over the Government’s program yesterday, Mher
Sedryakyan of the ruling Republican parliamentary faction cursed and
insulted Tert.am journalists who had approached him with a question.

Since the parliamentarian’s vocabulary obviously does not fit into
any moral, ethical, or even human realm, we will refrain, for the
time being, from publishing the audio recording and reproducing the
words addressed to our journalists that came out of and crossed the
mind of Mher Sedrakyan.

We hope that Sedrakyan will re-evaluate his conduct at the National
Assembly and apologize to Tert.am journalists. Otherwise, our editorial
team promises to pursue all means permitted by law to restore our
employees’ dignity and investigate the incident.

This is not the first time Sedrakyan insulted a media representative.

In 2012, in a conversation with Mher Arshakyan, a journalist from the
local news website A1+ he said, “Come on, get out of here! I’ll come
break your jaw”.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2014/05/23/mher-sedrakyan/

NKR Foreign Minister: Hatred Towards Anything Armenian Has Become A

NKR FOREIGN MINISTER: HATRED TOWARDS ANYTHING ARMENIAN HAS BECOME A STATE POLICY IN AZERBAIJAN

18:19 22.05.2014

Nagorno-Karabakh

“The foreign policy of the NKR is aimed at strengthening peace,
stability, and security in the region based on universal values of
democracy, human rights, and freedoms. We are convinced that the
current unrecognized status of Artsakh should not create barriers for
its engagement in the international processes,” Foreign Minister of
the Nagorno Karabakh Republic Karen Mirzoyan said in an interview with
the President of Canadian student association (AESPUL) Francois-Pierre
Cartolano.

“The key priorities of the NKR foreign policy are: the international
recognition of the independence of the NKR, a peaceful settlement of
the conflict between Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh, the protection
of the rights and interests of the NKR citizens abroad (as well as
Armenian refugees from Azerbaijan and internally displaced persons),
the attraction of foreign investments to the NKR economy, and the
promotion along with the strengthening of Artsakh-Armenia-Diaspora
cooperation,” he said.

The Minister said in 2014 they will continue efforts to reinstate the
positive tendencies towards the recognition of the NKR, as well as
the restoration of a full-fledged negotiation format with immediate
and direct participation of the NKR in all its phases: the absence
of one of the main parties to the conflict at the negotiation table
makes it difficult to achieve any real progress.

“Other priority tasks this year will be to give a new impetus to a
more lively and consistent work in the information field with the aim
of spreading reliable knowledge about the conflict between Azerbaijan
and Nagorno-Karabakh as well as promoting the significant achievements
in the democratic state-building and the current developments in our
Republic,” the Foreign Minister noted.

“The main challenge is the absence of international recognition of the
NKR. This in turn hampers the full-fledged activities of our Ministry
and sets certain limitations on the realization of its foreign policy.

In the meantime, these existing challenges give us an additional
impetus for more active and diligent work towards reaching the goals
set before us,” he added.

In January 2014, Los Angeles’ city council adopted a resolution
recognizing the NKR. “In recent years there has been a tendency
towards the recognition of the NKR on the level of different US and
Australian states along with recognitions by many cities (followed
by town-twinning or establishing friendship relationships with towns
of the NKR),” Karen Mirzoyan said.

The Minister reminded about the resolutions and statements supporting
the Karabakh people’s right to self-determination from the legislative
bodies of the American states of Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Maine,
and Louisiana as well as the Australian state of New South Wales.

“Furthermore, there’s the establishment of efficient ties at the
municipal level between the cities of Montebello, Fresno, Highland,
Los-Angeles, Pico Rivera (of the US), le Pen Mirabo, and Vien (of
France) with towns of the NKR. I am sure, that this process will have
its logical continuation and will gain new impetus. Today Artsakh
proved to the world that it is a well established state and can lead a
responsible and active foreign policy. The path which Artsakh has taken
is being adequately assessed by the international community,” he added.

Asked about the possibility of renewed aggression, the Minister said:
“The aggressive stance of Azerbaijan manifested in its non-stop
bellicose rhetoric, continued military buildup, and the constant
threats of a resumption of a new war all pose a serious risk to peace
and security in the region. Hatred towards anything Armenian has become
a state policy in Azerbaijan. So far the Azeri threats remain on the
level of militant rhetoric and provocations on the Line of Contact
(i.e. the current borders inherited from the ceasefire in 1994),
each of which could lead to unpredictable developments. As long as
there are no guarantees to the irreversibility of peace process and
non-resumption of military activities, peace and stability in the
region will always be threatened.”

“To date, the only guarantee of security of the NKR and its people
is the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic’s Defense Army which is alert and
ready to repel any encroachments along the borders. There’s also room
here for a role to be played by the international community. A clear
message about the absolute imperative of rejecting violence, honoring
already reached agreements, and arriving to a negotiated outcome has to
be an indispensable part of the collective practical efforts aimed at
supporting the settlement of the conflict,” the Foreign Minister said.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2014/05/22/nkr-foreign-minister-hatred-towards-anything-armenian-has-become-a-state-policy-in-azerbaijan/

Karen Mirzoyan: The Path Which Artsakh Took Is Adequately Assessed B

KAREN MIRZOYAN: THE PATH WHICH ARTSAKH TOOK IS ADEQUATELY ASSESSED BY THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY

Today – 17:05

Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic Karen
Mirzoyan gave an interview to President of Canadian student association
(AESPUL) Francois-Pierre Cartolano, which was published at the
organization’s web site on May 19. Official web-site of the Artsakh
Foreign Ministry informs about this. Here is the full interview:

The Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR or Artsakh Republic) attained
independence following a combined Armenian-Artsakh victory over
Azerbaijan in the Nagorno-Karabahk War of 1988-1994. Since then,
this de facto sovereign state has shed its Soviet legacy by building
a modern and prosperous society. However, the incredible progress
that was made over a span of two decades is continually jeopardized
by the unresolved state of the Karabakh conflict. Indeed, whilst a
ceasefire was agreed upon in 1994, a peace treaty has yet to be signed
between Stepanakert and Baku. Tensions still run high today, leading
to occasional border skirmishes that threaten the region’s stability.

Headed by Minister Karen Mirzoyan, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of
the NKR is hard at work preventing by all means possible a resumption
of hostilities and promoting a wider recognition of Artsakh’s
independence. I thus interviewed Mr. Mirzoyan to learn more about
the NKR’s present regional and international situation.

What is the NKR’s current foreign policy?

The foreign policy of the NKR is aimed at strengthening peace,
stability, and security in the region based on universal values of
democracy, human rights, and freedoms. We are convinced that the
current unrecognized status of Artsakh should not create barriers
for its engagement in the international processes.

The key priorities of the NKR foreign policy are: the international
recognition of the independence of the NKR, a peaceful settlement of
the conflict between Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh, the protection
of the rights and interests of the NKR citizens abroad (as well as
Armenian refugees from Azerbaijan and internally displaced persons),
the attraction of foreign investments to the NKR economy, and the
promotion along with the strengthening of Artsakh-Armenia-Diaspora
cooperation.

What is the extent of the NKR’s foreign relations in 2014?

We will continue our efforts to reinstate the positive tendencies
towards the recognition of the NKR, as well as the restoration of a
full-fledged negotiation format with immediate and direct participation
of the NKR in all its phases: the absence of one of the main parties
to the conflict at the negotiation table makes it difficult to achieve
any real progress.

Other priority tasks this year will be to give a new impetus to a more
lively and consistent work in the information field with the aim of
spreading reliable knowledge about the conflict between Azerbaijan and
Nagorno-Karabakh as well as promoting the significant achievements
in the democratic state-building and the current developments in
our Republic.

What are the main challenges faced by your Ministry?

The main challenge is the absence of international recognition of the
NKR. This in turn hampers the full-fledged activities of our Ministry
and sets certain limitations on the realization of its foreign policy.

In the meantime, these existing challenges give us an additional
impetus for more active and diligent work towards reaching the goals
set before us.

In January 2014, Los Angeles’ city council adopted a resolution
recognizing the NKR. Are more cities to follow and how is this
gesture helpful?

In recent years there has been a tendency towards the recognition of
the NKR on the level of different US and Australian states along with
recognitions by many cities (followed by town-twinning or establishing
friendship relationships with towns of the NKR).

I would like to underline, in particular, the resolutions and
statements supporting the Karabakh people’s right to self-determination
from the legislative bodies of the American states of Rhode Island,
Massachusetts, Maine, and Louisiana as well as the Australian state of
New South Wales. Furthermore, there’s the establishment of efficient
ties at the municipal level between the cities of Montebello, Fresno,
Highland, Los-Angeles, Pico Rivera (of the US), le Pen Mirabo, and Vien
(of France) with towns of the NKR. I am sure, that this process will
have its logical continuation and will gain new impetus. Today Artsakh
proved to the world that it is a well established state and can lead
a responsible and active foreign policy. The path which Artsakh has
taken is being adequately assessed by the international community.

Due to Azerbaijan’s aggressive stance, and following recent border
skirmishes, is renewed aggression to be expected?

The aggressive stance of Azerbaijan manifested in its non-stop
bellicose rhetoric, continued military buildup, and the constant
threats of a resumption of a new war all pose a serious risk to peace
and security in the region. Hatred towards anything Armenian has become
a state policy in Azerbaijan. So far the Azeri threats remain on the
level of militant rhetoric and provocations on the Line of Contact
(i.e. the current borders inherited from the ceasefire in 1994),
each of which could lead to unpredictable developments. As long as
there are no guarantees to the irreversibility of peace process and
non-resumption of military activities, peace and stability in the
region will always be threatened.

To date, the only guarantee of the security of the NKR and its people
is the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic’s Defense Army which is alert and
ready to repel any encroachments along the borders. There’s also
room here for a role to be played by the international community. A
clear message about the absolute imperative of rejecting violence,
honoring already reached agreements, and arriving to a negotiated
outcome has to be an indispensable part of the collective practical
efforts aimed at supporting the settlement of the conflict.

The goals of the noted organization are to establish a network of
friendship and cooperation with the relevant actors of the political
systems, as well as to promote knowledge about the different political
systems of the world among students.

http://times.am/?p=42291&l=en