Armenia Might Abolish Luxury Taxes

ARMENIA MIGHT ABOLISH LUXURY TAXES

The Messenger, Georgia
May 7 2014

By Messenger Staff
Wednesday, May 7
Currently, Armenia is considering the possibility of abolishing
“luxury taxes” introduced two years ago.

According to these taxes, luxurious cars, which costs 60,000 USD or
more, are taxed by 20% more than ordinary products.

However, this issue might become a matter of controversy and hot
debates in the parliament of Armenia.

There are different ways Armenian citizens register luxury cars
in Armenia.

As soon as Armenia enters the Customs Union, the duty clearance for
introducing the cars in the country will be extremely high and in fact,
it will only be possible to buy Russian cars.

Zoryan Inst. Message to the Turkish PM Erdogan

Please find below a link to the Message of the Prime Minister of The
Republic of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdoðan, on the “Events of 1915,”
issued on April 23, 2014. This is followed by the text of the response
to that message by the Zoryan Institute.

hed-a-message-on-the-events-of-1915.en.mfa

ZORYAN INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC.
255 Duncan Mill Rd., Suite 310
Toronto, ON, Canada M3B 3H9
Tel: 416-250-9807 Fax: 416-512-1736 E-mail:
[email protected]

May 5, 2014

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoðan
Ankara, Turkey
[email protected]

Prime Minister Erdoðan:

Your official statement on April 23 acknowledging how “The 24th of
April carries a particular significance for our [Turkey’s] Armenian
citizens and for all Armenians around the world” and your message of
condolence, “… we wish that the Armenians who lost their lives in
the context of the early twentieth century rest in peace, and we
convey our condolences to their grandchildren” constitute an
unprecedented step from the Turkish Government and must be recognized
as such.

But, Mr. Prime Minister, we can’t stop there, for the sincerity of
your condolence is undermined by the calculated presentation in the
rest of the letter. Allow me to point out a few examples.

1. You begin by saying this occasion “provides a valuable opportunity
to share opinions freely on a historical matter.” There can be
legitimate differences of opinion on historical matters, but opinions
must be grounded on facts. When there is incontestable evidence of
genocidal intent in the events of 1915-including from the Turkish
Archives-it undermines belief in your sincerity when you refer
euphemistically to “relocations,” instead of the painful death marches
they were. It was the killing, planned and executed by the state
apparatus, of about 1.5 million and the deportation of the rest of the
2.5 million Armenian citizens of Ottoman Turkey, with the intent to
exterminate the entire race. This is not a matter of historical
opinion; it is the reality that we must share. Presumably, this is the
reason for your letter of condolence in the first place.

2. You state that “In Turkey, expressing different opinions and
thoughts freely on the events of 1915 is the requirement of a
pluralistic perspective as well as of a culture of democracy and
modernity.” This lofty sentiment creates the impression that you are
open and caring about truth, when, in fact, you are using it as a
Trojan horse and a blatant political stratagem to play with the minds
of the general public. During your tenure, many scholars, journalists
and intellectuals have been persecuted, jailed, and even murdered for
holding opinions on 1915 that differ from your official state
narrative.

3. It is true that “It is indisputable that the last years of the
Ottoman Empire were a difficult period, full of suffering for millions
of Ottoman citizens, regardless of their religion or ethnic origin.”
Indeed, your Foreign Minister, His Excellency Ahmet Davutoglu, refers
to this in his op-ed piece in The Guardian expressing support for your
letter of condolence:

A series of ethnic cleansings in the Balkans pushed millions
eastward, transforming the demographic structure of
Anatolia….. Approximately 5 million Ottoman citizens were driven
away from their ancestral homes in the Balkans, the Caucasus and
Anatolia. While much of western history tells of the suffering of the
dispossessed and dead Ottoman Christians, the colossal suffering of
Ottoman Muslims remains largely unknown outside of Turkey.

We can understand and share with compassion the pain of all those
Muslims who were forcibly expelled from the Balkans, the Caucuses and
Crimea. We know firsthand that pain. I am the son of two Armenians
orphaned in 1915 from Urfa, Anatolia, and who were deported after
losing their entire families, and others at the Zoryan Institute, as
well as most other Armenians, also have this personal experience. We
know well the pain of being uprooted from your ancestral homeland and
of being a refugee growing up in several countries, none of which
replace what home once was, or allow you to maintain continuity with
your cherished history and culture.

But, Mr. Erdoðan, you talk about suffering while ignoring how the
suffering was inflicted. You lump all of the millions of deaths
together without making the critical distinction between the causes of
death, those who were targeted for extermination, and those who died
from the war. More Germans died in WWII than did Jews, for example,
but the deaths had very different causes and different meanings, as
did the deaths of the Armenians within the Ottoman Empire. We agree
that no one should try to construct hierarchies of pain. However, the
pain of those Ottoman Muslims was not inflicted by our Armenian
fathers or grandfathers, whereas the pain of the planned destruction
of the 2.5 million Armenians in 1915 was caused by yours.

Genocide denial involves four dimensions: denial of the facts,
responsibility, calling the events something else, and relativization.
Your letter engages in all four. Until you and the Turkish State
demonstrate a sincere and apologetic expression about the consequences
of your ancestors’ actions, your condolences to the Armenians will be
perceived as insincere and a cleverly contrived trick for gaining an
end.

No Turk living today can be held responsible for the crime of the
genocide committed by the Ottoman regime. Yet, your country and your
government are responsible for the aggressive and ongoing denial,
which exacerbates and perpetuates the pain of the Armenians and itself
is considered the continuation of the crime. We believe that the
Armenian people worldwide would embrace the whole people of Turkey, if
the Turkish Government acknowledges the responsibility of its
predecessor, the Ottoman Empire, in the planned annihilation of its
Armenian citizens, expresses a sincere apology, and makes appropriate
efforts at atonement. That would build trust between the parties and
allow the healing and forgiving process leading to a true liberation
for all concerned. In this respect, we take this opportunity to
express our deepest sympathy to the families of all those righteous
Muslims-Turks, Kurds, and Arabs-who risked their lives to save
Armenians during that period.

Your call for a joint historical commission to study the events of
1915 is only a public relations stratagem. Please recall that in 2003,
the Turkish-Armenian Reconciliation Commission requested The
International Center for Transitional Justice to examine the Armenian
Genocide issue. The ICTJ issued its finding that “the Events, viewed
collectively, can thus be said to include all of the elements of the
crime of genocide as defined in the Convention, and legal scholars as
well as historians, politicians, journalists and other people would be
justified in continuing to so describe them.” The Turkish members of
the Commission rejected this finding and TARC broke apart. Why would
you now propose another joint commission, when you have already
rejected an independent, third-party finding from an organization
headed by the renowned Elie Wiesel? You, yourself, have repeatedly
stated publicly that you would never accept that Turkey committed
genocide. It is difficult to reconcile this with your statement that
“Turkey has always supported scholarly and comprehensive studies for
an accurate understanding of history.”

Mr. Prime Minister, if you really would like to see “that the peoples
of an ancient and unique geography, who share similar customs and
manners will be able to talk to each other about the past with
maturity and to remember together their losses in a decent manner,”
then perhaps you could take a few very simple steps to show your
commitment, by establishing diplomatic relations with Armenia, with no
preconditions, and opening the borders between the two countries
(closed only from the Turkish side), as a first step to commencing
dialogue. This would demonstrate in a tangible way the sincerity of
your letter of condolence and be a first step towards reconciliation.

Yours sincerely,

K.M. Greg Sarkissian, President

http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkish-prime-minister-mr_-recep-tayyip-erdogan-publis
www.zoryaninstitute.org

Armenia, Sweden Or Belgium? Five Songs To Watch Out For In The First

ARMENIA, SWEDEN OR BELGIUM? FIVE SONGS TO WATCH OUT FOR IN THE FIRST EUROVISION SEMI-FINAL

Metro, UK
May 6 2014

Caroline Westbrook

Planning to watch the first Eurovision semi-final? Make sure you keep
your eyes peeled for this quintet of contenders.

So Eurovision 2014 is finally upon us, but before we all get to
see how our very own Molly fares in Copenhagen, we’ve got a pair of
semi-finals to look forward to.

Tuesday night’s semi will see the first 16 countries take to the
Eurovision stage in their bid to win one of 10 places in Saturday
night’s final (alongside automatic qualifiers France, Spain, Germany,
Italy, the UK and Denmark).

And here’s just some of the contenders you can look forward to –
or not, as the case may be – on the big night…

Armenia – Not Alone by Aram MP3

Gruff Armenian crooner Aram MP3 is not only kicking off the whole
shebang on Tuesday night but is also the favourite to win the entire
contest with this moody little number, which starts off as a lush
ballad before suddenly taking a dub-steppy turn around the two minute
mark. Either the one to beat, or some bloke standing alone on a vast
stage singing the words ‘not alone’ several thousand times to the
point of distraction, depending on your opinion.

Will it make the final? Almost certainly.

Sweden – Undo by Sanna Nielsen

Habitual Melodifestivalen hopeful Sanna has finally made it to the
Eurovision stage after six previous attempts to represent Sweden at
the contest. And she’s done it with what can only be described as an
epic ballad that ticks all the necessary boxes. Anthemic chorus?

Check. Key change? Check. Wind machine? Oh probably.

Will it make the final? Yes. But it’s worth noting that Sweden have
never actually won the contest with a ballad, so whether or not it
gets any further is another matter.

Hungary – Running by Andras Kallay-Saunders

Possibly one of the grimmest songs ever to make it to the Eurovision
arena, Running weaves a sorry tale of child abuse which may well
surprise all those still convinced that your average entry draws its
lyrics from the boom bang-a-bang style school of songwriting. It’s
also rather good.

Will it make the final? Not only will it make the final but its
dramatic blend of ballad crossed with drum n’bass makes it a potential
contender for the title. One could almost say they are Hungary for
the win. Shall we just end it there?

Belgium – Mother by Axel Hirsoux

Here’s a song which has thoroughly divided Eurovision fans, with
some absolutely loving the sentiments and operatic stylings of
Axel’s maternal tribute – and others finding the whole thing just
a tad creepy. And yes, he actually does refer to his mother as ‘my
satellite’ in the chorus. We’ll be honest, we’re kind of veering
towards the latter opinion.

Will it make the final? Highly likely. Although your own ma may never
forgive you for voting for it.

Netherlands – Calm After The Storm by the Common Linnets

The Dutch are kind of on a roll after Anouk finally returned them
to the top ten in 2013 – and this year they’ve followed a similarly
classy route with their entry, a gorgeous country-tinged ballad by duo
Waylon and Ilse de Lange (performing under the above name). A few more
songs like this in the Eurovision line-up certainly wouldn’t go amiss.

Will it make the final: If the massed voting ranks do the right thing
then it will. Come on people, you know it makes sense.

The first Eurovision semi-final is on BBC Three from 8pm.

http://metro.co.uk/2014/05/06/armenia-sweden-or-belgium-five-songs-to-watch-out-for-in-the-first-eurovision-semi-final-4716900/

Senators Address Grievances From Disqualified Elections Candidates

SENATORS ADDRESS GRIEVANCES FROM DISQUALIFIED ELECTIONS CANDIDATES

Highlander Newspaper, CA
May 6 2014

Written by Sandy Van

Members of ASUCR issued apologies during last week’s senate meeting,
with some expressing regret for giving late notifications to seven
candidates who were found to be ineligible to run in the 2014-15
elections.

“On behalf of the elections committee, I apologize to all the
candidates who were disqualified on such short notice,” said Senator
Niela Darmani. “Regardless, we did put (the disqualification decision)
to vote (and) the senate did vote to not allow it to pass.”

A special senate meeting was held on April 21, where a few disqualified
candidates attempted to appeal a previous judicial branch decision,
ruling that candidates were ineligible to run. Some candidates cited
poor grades as the reason behind their disqualification. Senators
voted to support the judicial branch ruling, but Outreach Director
Mina Kato attempted to reconsider the vote, which President Sai
Patadia believed to be “illegitimate.” The meeting was effectively
halted after Patadia encouraged members of the senate to leave the
senate chambers to prevent Kato’s motion from going through.

Disqualified candidate Arturo Gomez described the April 21 senate
meeting to reconsider the disqualifications a “farce,” stating that
members of senate behaved in an “unprofessional” manner by leaving
during the middle of the meeting.

“When there’s a civil discussion, you don’t shout at people and tell
them to get up and leave. You were elected to be professionals (and)
you were elected to do your jobs,” explained Gomez.

Kato explained that the motion was made after hearing different
interpretations of the constitution and the motion was not out of
malintent toward the senate. “I felt like I could make a motion
with additional information and multiple views on the constitution,”
said Kato.

Abstaining from the special vote to reconsider, Senator Jessica Moncayo
referred to Robert’s Rules of Order — a constitutional framework
for holding student government meetings — which stated that members
of the senate are allowed to reconsider a vote as long as it is a
“hasty action” to correct any votes believed to be erroneous.

Despite the roundtable apologies initially given, President Sai
Patadia said he could not apologize for the overall disqualification
process. “I do not apologize for standing up for what I thought
was going to be an illegitimate vote, but I do apologize for the
procedure and how you were notified late,” he said. “I think it’s
important that every association acknowledges where it should improve.”

On the other hand, Senator Abraham Galvan held fast to the belief
that members of the senate who walked out of the special meeting
could have made other choices instead.

“You might’ve disagreed with (the decision to reconsider), you
might’ve thought it was wrong, but you could’ve voted against it,
you could’ve abstained from it, you could’ve submitted a case to the
judicial branch if you thought it was inappropriate,” he said.

“There’s a lot of things that you could’ve done besides encouraging
people to get up and leave the meeting when there were still people
in the galley ready to talk to us.”

After a long discussion, Moncayo later encouraged Gomez to be proactive
about any cases of perceived misconduct or alleged unfairness in the
future senate.

An omnipresent silence fell upon the Senate chambers toward the end
of the meeting as senators took a moment to recognize the following
historical events: the Fall of Saigon (1975), the Armenian Genocide
(1915-1923), and the Holocaust (1933-45).

The Fall of Saigon marked the end of the Vietnam War and the start of
a transition period leading to the formal reunification of Vietnam
into a Socialist Republic governed by the Communist Party. Another
historical event that was brought up was the Armenian Genocide, which
the senate previously declared a day of remembrance for on April 24.

The occurrence is seen by many as the Ottoman Empire’s systematic
extermination of the Armenian people during and after World War I. The
Holocaust was the genocide of approximately six million Jews by Nazi
Germany during World War II.

http://www.highlandernews.org/13530/senators-address-grievances-from-disqualified-elections-candidates/

Tehran: Iranian VP Congratulates Appointment Of New Armenian PM

IRANIAN VP CONGRATULATES APPOINTMENT OF NEW ARMENIAN PM

Tasnim News Agency, Iran
May 6 2014

May 06, 2014 – 12:33

TEHRAN (Tasnim) – Iranian First Vice President Eshaq Jahangiri in a
message to Hovik Abrahamyan congratulated him on appointment as the
new Armenian Prime Minister.

Print

In his message on Monday, Jahangiri also expressed the hope that the
good neighborliness between Tehran and Yerevan would be expanded in
all fields.

Iran and Armenia have always enjoyed amicable relations in a whole
host of fields.

In a Monday meeting with visiting Armenian Foreign Minister Eduard
Nalbandian in Tehran, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani voiced
Iran’s preparedness to host the Armenian investors as part of a
broader effort to strengthen economic and trade ties between the two
neighboring states.

He added that Tehran would also encourage the Iranian private sector
to invest in Armenia mutually.

President Rouhani further expressed the hope that the economic and
trade relations between the two nations would flourish.

Nalbandian, for his part, pointed to Tehran-Yerevan close ties in
cultural, training, energy and transportation fields, and hailed the
reciprocal visits by the two countries’ officials.

http://www.tasnimnews.com/English/Home/Single/361319

Tehran: Iran, Armenia To Construct Dam On Araxes

IRAN, ARMENIA TO CONSTRUCT DAM ON ARAXES

Mehr News Agency, Iran
May 5 2014

Tehran: The managing director of Iran Water and Power Resources
Development Company has said Iran and Armenia consider construction
of a dam on River Araxes. In an interview to Mehr News, Mohammad Reza
Rezazadeh provided the details of meetings with Armenian officials
about joint hydroelectric power plant constructed on River Araxes in
Iran-Armenia borders.

In construction of dams, considerations should be made in terms of the
rivers water amount, he said, and that reassessment of the project
of construction of dam on Araxes would yield no significant changes
to the plan prepared.

He also said that Armenian minister of energy would also discuss the
project with his advisers. Iranian experts visited Armenia for a field
investigation and they found that the former USSR-era explorations
had confirmed Iran-initiated project, he added.

We currently wait for the expert final advice by Armenian ministry
of energy, Rezazadeh said.

In 2011, Iran and Armenia launched a joint dam and power plant on
Araxes projects in northwestern borders of Iran.

Beirut: Specters Of War Thwart Efforts To Forget

SPECTERS OF WAR THWART EFFORTS TO FORGET

The Daily Star, Lebanon
May 5 2014

May 05, 2014 12:03 AMBy India Stoughton
The Daily Star

BEIRUT: As we troop awkwardly through the narrow streets of Khandaq
al-Ghamiq, our guide gestures to the decaying facade of a once-stunning
building.

The balconies are crumbling, their wrought-iron rails rusted. The
masonry is pocked with bullet holes, window frames empty or fringed
with jagged, lethal-looking shards of glass.

As if unaware of the devastation that has been wrought on the building,
the guide orders us to take note of the beautiful architecture. The
derelict-looking structure is occupied, he notes in passing, but the
inhabitants in the area are forbidden to hang washing outside to dry.

Pointing out one building where residents have blithely ignored this
stipulation, he complains that he has called the police several times
but no one ever shows up.

The washing, he claims, ruins the area’s historic appearance.

“Watch Your Step: Beirut Heritage Walking Tour,” is an interactive,
site-specific performance directed by actress and AUB theater studies
lecturer Sahar Assad and written by Robert Myers, cultural historian
and AUB professor of English and Creative Writing.

Six tours took place over the weekend, led by actors Raffi Feghali
and Sany Baki. Numerous interventions and interruptions along the way
are devised by students from Assaf’s “Workshop in Theater Production”
and enacted by theater students from five Beirut universities.

A sizable group follows Feghali through Khandaq al-Ghamiq Friday. As
we mill like sheep in his wake, he rattles off architectural facts at
great speed. The consummate tour guide, he seems keen to rush through
the sites and collect his tips in time for Happy Hour.

Inside a building he claims was designed by “the Lebanese Gaudi” –
a corner apartment block with an elaborate, decorative facade – we
stop in a spacious first floor apartment. Its beautifully proportioned
rooms are long-since abandoned. Feghali calmly brushes a thick layer
of grime from a small section of the floor, imploring us to observe
the beautiful tiles.

Two floors above, we wait in awkward silence as he negotiates with a
young man in a soldier’s drab olive attire. Before accepting LL20,000
to let us inside the apartment, he eyes us with scorn and twice spits
at our guide’s feet.

An ancient suite of furniture, coated with decades of dust, attests
to a want of inhabitants. Our guide informs us that the building’s
tenants are actually four young men in combat-colored clothing –
lounging on newspapers, smoking and playing cards amid the rubbish,
abandoned dolls and filthy mattresses.

Seemingly utterly disinterested, he draws our attention to an
exquisitely painted ceiling, now damaged and peeling, urging us to step
over and around the young men as casually as the dusty furnishings.

As the tour progresses, our guide’s chatter becomes increasingly
bizarre. Strange incidents begin to intrude. As we turn the corner
of what our guide says is Syria Street, a young woman dressed in a
blue bathrobe begins to scream at him in Armenian.

Apparently embarrassed by her outburst, the guide smiles awkwardly and
looks at his feet. When she stops shouting, he ushers us urgently away.

“What was she saying?” enquires an audience member.

“Oh, just something about how the Armenians used to live here but
were driven out and exterminated like they were in Turkey,” he says.

“Nothing important.”

We visit a small, cramped flat where a wild-haired, catatonic-looking
woman sits at a small table with two plates of congealing pasta. We
shuffle past to the balcony.

As we aim our gazes wherever our guide commands, the woman appears,
staring into our faces one by one. Seizing a bearded young man,
she shakes him violently then runs inside.

The guide mutters something like: “She does this every time.”

We edge back inside, studiously avoiding her gaze. As the last member
of our group reaches the hallway, a blood-curdling scream issues
from within, and several people jump. The guide slams the door as
though protecting himself from an attacking dog and impatiently herds
us outside.

An exercise in resurrecting past trauma, “Watch Your Step” is likely
one of the most fascinating and least comfortable performances to
take place in Beirut in recent years.

“The inspiration of the text was a play by [Argentine playwright]
Griselda Gambaro,” Assaf explains. “She wrote a play in the ’70s
entitled ‘Information for Foreigners,’ which is also a sort of
promenade performance … basically pointing the finger at audiences
as accomplices to the state terrorism in Argentina at that time.

“When I read the play, I thought of our Civil War: ‘This would make
a great project for the students.’ So we read it together. We started
brainstorming and I started to look for a location …

“I passed through Khandaq al-Ghamiq and the first thing that struck
me was that the moment you’re in the area you automatically think
of the Civil War … You go down to Downtown it’s as if you’re in a
different country – there’s no trace of the war. Here it’s like the
whole area is a monument.”

Assaf came up with the idea of contrasting a manifestation of the
post-war amnesia – the tour guide’s shallow, fabricated rhetoric –
with dramatic moments based on stories residents shared with her
or gleaned from research conducted by the International Center for
Transitional Justice.

The wailing woman, she explains, is based on a lady whose son
disappeared during the conflict. Three decades on, she still prepares
two plates of food every night, refusing to leave the house for fear
he might return.

“I wanted to make a play about our memory of the Civil War,”
says Assaf, who timed the performances to coincide with the 39th
anniversary of the conflict’s beginning, “to just say simply that we
must remember. We have to look back, we have to step back in history
in order for there to be a peaceful present and a peaceful future.

“We had 15 years of Civil War that ended overnight when all the
fighting parties came together and decided to end it, like it was
a football match or something … They rehabilitated all of the
buildings, but they’ve done no rehabilitation for the human beings –
all the people who disappeared, all the people who lost their houses,
lost their future, lost everything.”

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the performance was the
audience’s reluctance to intervene in scenes of violence, and
willingness to passively witness strangers’ suffering.

“The guide is an accomplice, [a manifestation] of Lebanese amnesia,”
Assaf says. “Like in Gambaro’s play, the audience becomes an
accomplice to what’s happening. You see that he’s lying, but what do
you do? Nothing. You just nod and move on.”

A thought-provoking performance, “Watch Your Step” is amusing,
enlightening and deeply sad. Allowing audiences a rare opportunity
to explore the interiors of some war-ravaged Beirut buildings,
it simultaneously provides an insight into the human cost of the
conflict and the passive mentality that allows atrocities to happen.

Far more than a simple trip down memory lane, “Watch Your Step”
was a chilling wake-up call.

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/Culture/Performance/2014/May-05/255335-specters-of-war-thwart-efforts-to-forget.ashx#axzz30rdSC7hf

The World Champion Is Leaving Armenia. The Reason Is The Indifferenc

THE WORLD CHAMPION IS LEAVING ARMENIA. THE REASON IS THE INDIFFERENCE BY THE STATE SPORTS DEPARTMENT

May 5 2014

Recently, the President of Armfighting federation Hayk Ghukasyan
announced that the world champion by ProFc David Khachatryan last
time will act in the defense fight for the championship belt with the
Turkish opponent in the city of Yaroslavl on May 11 under the flag of
Armenia. “After that, David will enter the Octagon as a representative
of the Russian Federation,” said the coach of the champion. Aravot.am
was excited about this statement, even though Hayk Ghukasyan and
David Khachatryan had hinted on it during the press conference held
after the next victory in Russia, on April, noting that if Armenia
offers the athlete at least 10 percent of conditions offered by Russia
and Iran, David will definitely stay in Armenia. Today, during the
conversation held in Armfighting federation, Hayk Ghukasyan said
to Aravot.am, “What we have accomplished until now, we had done is
solely on our resources. We have not received a penny from the state
as support. The athlete’s life in sports is short. Moreover, in the
professional martial arts, where each fight in the ring is full of
health hazards. David is already 26 years old, with a family and a
child.And endangering his health, he earns by fighting. During all
this time, we had solved all the problems together with our existing
capabilities. Now, his status is quite different. David is a world
renowned fighter, and it has been for three years that many countries
are interested in his services. In the meantime, there had been
numerous proposals. But we have rejected for the sake of Armenia, and
the honor of the Armenia sporting flag… and have got zero attention
and attitude. There has been no penny of state funding. Moreover,
I was told at the Ministry of Sports and Youth Affairs that the IOC
does not accept general fighting as a sport game. To a certain extent,
I agree. But, the Ministry is also involved in education issues
of the youth, isn’t it. More than thousands of boys and young men
getting trained in the branches of the Federation throughout Armenia,
possessing the alphabet and nuances of the so-called “fighting”,
afterwards they start preventing the street fights. As for David,
he is not an ordinary athlete anymore. He has a stable place in
the world’s elite. And it is not in vain that Russia and Iran were
persistently pursuing for three years to acquire him, offering ideal
conditions. What? Don’t they know that our sport is not an Olympic?

Even now, I am reluctantly going for this step. But there is no
alternative. Let it not seem immodest, but today athletes of seven
countries willingly are trained in the small area rented at No. 188
School by our Federation, and are willing to act under the flag of
Armenia. Whereas we… We do not devote much attention to our world
champion. I am no more able to tell by world champion trained here in
Armenia to stay, if he cannot be paid to meet the minimum necessary
requirements. One more thing. David Khachatryan is not one of the
athletes who hold one or two fights in the professional ring and
then submit arrogant demands. In the professional ring, a record is
registered next to his name: 15 wins and 2 losses. Moreover, winning
the current world champions. Four more wins were not registered. And
the two losses were the result of bias. In fact, recently the coach of
one of these two “happy men” admitted in front of the camera that David
had actually won his trainee, but the victory was taken away from him.”

Ashot HAKOBYAN

Read more at:

http://en.aravot.am/2014/05/05/165052/

Spain is inviting back Jews expelled from the country in the 16th Ce

Spain is inviting back Jews expelled from the country in the 16th
Century. Just don’t mention the Muslims

Our cousins in Madrid and Lisbon simply don’t want Muslims to come to Europe

ROBERT FISK

Sunday 4 May 2014

Lost lands are littered with the homes of those who lived there.
Armenian houses in south-eastern Turkey. Abandoned Palestinian homes
in Israel. German property in what was the Sudetenland and Prussia.
There are Greek homes around Smyrna ` now Izmir ` and down the west
coast of Ireland lie the roofless cottages of those who died or
emigrated in the Great Famine. Michael Barry, an Irish engineer and
railwayman, has recorded the broken homes of the Moriscos ` `little
Moors’ ` of Spain, the very last Muslims to be driven out of Andalusia
in 1613. His photographs of arched stone walls, roofless cabins and
broken timbers in Atzuvieta in Valencia look eerily similar to the
wreckage of the 19th-century peasant houses of his own country.

The year of darkness, of course, was 1492, when the Moorish kingdom of
Granada surrendered to Ferdinand and Isabella. Christian power was
restored to the lands in which Muslims and Jews had lived together for
hundreds of years and had rescued some of the great works of classical
literature ` by way of Baghdad ` for us to study. Save for those who
converted to Christianity or died at the stake ` at least 1,000 Jews,
perhaps as many as 10,000, among them ` the entire Muslim and Jewish
communities were thrown out of Spain and Portugal by the early 17th
century. They scattered, to Morocco, Algeria, Bosnia, Greece and
Turkey. Which is why the glories of Andalusian architecture can still
be found in north Africa. The Sephardic (Spanish) Jews spoke Ladino,
which was still understood in Sarajevo during the Bosnian war of the
1990s. In just over 100 years, the Christian monarchy of Spain had
expelled half a million Muslims and between 200,000 and 300,000 Jews.
There are now around 3.5 million Sephardic Jews in the world. Their
ancient homes also still exist in Spain.

But now Spain and Portugal want to make amends, so we are told. They
will give citizenship ` full passports ` to the descendants of
families expelled from their countries. The government regards the
expulsions as `a tragedy’, or ` in the words of Spain’s justice
minister ` a `historical error’. It was, of course, an ethnic
cleansing, a massive crime against humanity, but don’t let’s expect
too much from our Spanish and Portuguese friends, as there are,
unfortunately, a few problems. For example: Muslims need not apply.

Jewish descendants of those expelled from the Iberian peninsula in the
15th and 16th centuries can claim a passport which will allow them to
travel freely in 28 EU countries. Many of those expected to apply live
in Israel. They are being given a `right of return’ ` a right which
Israel does not, of course, grant to the former Arab inhabitants of
Palestine who were driven from their homes after the creation of
Israel. Spanish and Portuguese officials preferred not to dwell on
such matters ` nor to explain why they have chosen to discriminate
racially between those who were expelled from their lands 600 years
ago.

The tragedy of Andalusia lasted for more than a century and there were
Muslim rebellions ` put down with Christian brutality ` which, so
comes the double-speak from Spain, may have disqualified the Muslims
from Madrid’s generosity. In popular imagination, expulsion in time of
war ` and this might apply to the Palestinians ` somehow doesn’t quite
equal the wholesale expulsion of peoples on purely racial grounds.
Thus, so this theory goes, the Jewish descendants of 15th century
Spain have more rights than their Muslim brothers. A dodgy argument.

But there are other problems. It seems that approval of Jewish
requests for citizenship in many cases will have to be approved by
local Jewish community groups; thus, any refusals cannot be laid at
the door of the Madrid government. And Jewish columnist Micah Halpern,
who describes himself as an expert on `terrorism’ (sic) and `Islamic
fundamentalism’, has harshly condemned the whole fandango. The Spanish
and Portuguese are not apologising to the Jews ` as they certainly
should ` but merely offering them passports. There will be no attempt
to pay compensation. And Muslims expelled from Spain in 1609, as Mr
Halpern notes, are excluded.

But so far as he is concerned, the so-called `generous’ offer from
Spain and Portugal is not being made for reasons of conscience, but
because Jews are `good with money’ and will help the economies of
these two bankrupt nations. `This is a decision based on economic
need,’ he writes. `And that is why no invitation was extended to
Muslims. The return of Muslims would mean that tens of millions [sic]
of people could claim citizenship but they would not be bringing in
money.’ This is a bit odd. Tens of thousands of Muslims are extremely
wealthy and could also bring large sums of money to Spain and
Portugal. Spanish Muslim groups have long campaigned for citizenship
rights for the descendants of Muslims who were expelled or forced to
convert at the same time as the Jews. No, the real reasons for their
racism is that our cousins in Madrid and Lisbon simply don’t want
Muslims to come to Europe, let alone become citizens. And they can
rely on the fact that very few Jews who take up their offer, many now
living in America as well as Israel, will actually come to live in
Spain. Muslims might well do so.

Mr Halpern writes of the German apologies for the Holocaust and
America’s regrets over slavery. Oddly, he does not mention the
Armenians who are denied apologies from Turkey. But he concludes by
saying that all Spain and Portugal can hear `is the clinking of
money’. A simplification, I suspect. Spain and Portugal simply want to
ensure that the Muslim expulsion is permanent. Andalusia was one of
the wonders of what we now call multi-culturalism. The Spanish don’t
want it back. `Everything declines,’ wrote the poet Salih bin Sharif
al-Rundi of Seville in 1248, `after reaching perfection¦’

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/spain-is-inviting-back-jews-expelled-from-the-country-in-the-16th-century-just-dont-mention-the-muslims-9322518.html

L’Arménie attend plus de la Turquie

Charente Libre, France
Vendredi 25 Avril 2014

L’Arménie attend plus de la Turquie

L’Arménie, qui a commémoré hier le génocide perpétré il y a 99 ans
sous l’empire ottoman, a rejeté les condoléances présentées par la
Turquie dans un geste inédit, et réclamé d’Ankara reconnaissance et
«repentir».

Sans interpeller directement son allié turc au sein de l’Otan, et sans
utiliser le mot «génocide», le président américain Barack Obama a
appelé de son côté à une «reconnaissance pleine, franche et juste des
faits», dans un communiqué.

Le département d’Etat a cependant qualifié les condoléances turques
d’«historiques», estimant qu’elles pourraient ouvrir la voie à une
normalisation entre l’Arménie et la Turquie.

A l’occasion des commémorations du génocide à Paris, le président
français François Hollande a vu dans le geste de la Turquie «une
évolution». Les condoléances présentées à l’Arménie sont «un mot qu’il
faut entendre mais qui ne peut pas encore suffire», a toutefois nuancé
le chef de l’Etat français. «Ce qui doit être dit, c’est ce qui s’est
produit», a-t-il souligné.

Pour le président arménien, le génocide «continue tant que le
successeur de la Turquie ottomane poursuit sa politique de déni
total».

La veille, le Premier ministre turc, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a fait un
geste inattendu en présentant les condoléances de la Turquie «aux
petits-enfants des Arméniens tués en 1915» lors des massacres visant
cette communauté sous l’empire ottoman.

C’est la première fois que le chef du gouvernement turc s’est exprimé
aussi ouvertement sur ce drame survenu entre 1915 et 1917, aux
dernières années de l’empire ottoman et qui est reconnu comme un
génocide par de nombreux pays, ce que la Turquie refuse de son côté
farouchement.