Court of NKR Starts Hearing of Case of Azerbaijani Reconnaissance Gr

Court of NKR Starts Hearing of Case of Azerbaijani Reconnaissance Group

Pastinfo, News Agency
Law – 26 October 2014, 19:12

On Monday, October 27, the NKR Court of General Jurisdiction of
Stepanakert will start the hearing of the criminal case of the
Azerbaijani saboteurs Dilham Gardashkhan oghli Askerov and Shahbaz
Jalal oghli Guliyev who were arrested in Karvachar region of
Stepanakert last summer.

Pastinfo has learned from the NKR Judicial Department that Shahbaz
Jalal oghli Guliyev was indicted under Article 350 Para 2, Article
316, Article 45 Para 3, Article 129 Para 3.1 and Article 183 Para 3.3
of the NKR Criminal Code.

The Azerbaijani saboteur is accused of premeditated act committed by
an organized group, use of violence, crossing the NKR state border,
spying, illicitly transporting or carrying weapons and ammunition,
abduction and theft.

And his accomplice Dilham Gardashkhan oghli Askerov, aside from these
charges, is also accused of murder, abduction of a person or taking
hostage and stealing a person’s passport or ID card or any other
important document under Article 103 Para 2.3 and 2.14 and Article 344
Para 1 of the NKR Criminal Code.

In June 2014 Smbat Tsakanyan’s body was found in Shahumyan region of
NKR with multiple firearm wounds. Later it was found out that he had
been abducted and cruelly murdered by the members of the commando.

Furthermore, they had killed NKR Defense Army officer Sargis
Abrahamyan and wounded Karine Davtyan travelling with him in his car.

The criminal case has been taken for proceedings by Judge Anatoliy
Tadevosyan of the NKR First Instance Court of General Jurisdiction.

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/right/view/33141#sthash.7Wa1NZ7w.dpuf

Russia Has Been Locked For A Long Time

Russia Has Been Locked For A Long Time

Igor Muradyan, Political Analyst
Comments – 24 October 2014, 01:00

How can Russia be locked in the virtual space which is called Eurasia
in Moscow? The West is not against the localization of the Russian
pseudo-imperial ideology in Eurasia, especially that nobody has so far
figured out where the borders of Eurasia are.

With any political-ideological regime Russia will continue to supply
carbohydrates and other mineral resources to the world market,
primarily meeting the needs of developed states of the West because it
has nothing else to supply.

In fact, there are different approaches and tools, and aside from the
economic tools there are military tools, primarily in the regions. It
is, first of all, the North Caucasus, Central Asia and Ukraine where a
military-political and economic conflict is here to stay.

Russia seems to have temporarily improved its relations with the
countries of the North Caucasus. Moscow fears and avoids participation
in any conflicts in Central Asia, which was demonstrated by
developments in Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, and this illustrates, by
the way, what a failure defense organization CSTO is.

Moscow is right when it says that it did not intend to initiate a war
in Ukraine and, allegedly, the war was imposed on it. Moscow has done
everything it could to entrap Ukraine into a war, and one has to be a
talented idiot to lead to such an irresolvable conflict.

Russia’s strategic allies are not interested in a solution of this
fratricide war because this is the most effective way of locking
Russia within Eurasia, make it spend huge resources, as well as
question not only the success of the ruling regime but also the
“imperial” dream of the Russian society.

Ukraine is experiencing a period of national renewal and start of an
irreversible integration with NATO and the European Union. Ukraine
lost the first war with Russia and admitted to this though it is hard
to describe the existing situation as Russia’s victory. Ukraine has
created its military forces anew, and in a few years it will become
one of the most militarized states in Europe, relying on its own
resources, national ideals and military traditions.

(About half of family names of Full Cavaliers of the Georgian Cross in
Vladimir Hall in the Kremlin were Ukrainian, half of marshals and
generals who won World War II were Ukrainian.)

In the ongoing stage the West has backed Ukraine and, indicating that
nobody is going to shed blood for Ukraine, the West is, nevertheless,
participating in militarization and army building in Ukraine.

Nevertheless, the West is fine with the occupation of part of the
territory of the southeast of Ukraine. First of all, several millions
of Russians living here are withdrawn from the political turnover.
Second, Russia has created a “Vietnam” and it will not be able to get
over this “Vietnam” for a long time.

Vietnam was a faraway and vague country for the United States. In
Russia these Ukrainian territories are a matter of political survival
for the ruling elite and the geopolitical format of the Russian
national ideology. However, Vietnam is Vietnam, and this model of war
successfully covers the Ukrainian-Russian conflict.

In fact, the war is led outside the habitat of the main components of
the Ukrainian population, and the war is not felt in the main
industrial and vital centers of Ukraine. The war is increasingly
changing to a guerilla war, which was supposed from the very
beginning. Most probably, the underground war between the Ukrainians
and Russians will add to the guerilla war. Now the massacre between
two nations is prevented somehow but it will not be possible to
prevent it for a long time.

However, the involvement of Russia in the war is appearing a favorable
factor not only for the international community but also for the
Ukrainian elites whose goal is to oust the Russian population from
Ukraine. And if one dares claim that this is fantasy, one should have
a look at the South and North Caucasus, at what has happened there.

The Russians have not exercised their right to taboo, and there are no
tabooed ones now. The Russians felt they were untouchable, whereas
they will be running away faster than anyone else. In the late 1980s
the Russians wrote on the walls in Tashkent: “We chased Germans to
Berlin, we will chase you to Sakhalin.” Is the voice of the Russians
heard in Uzbekistan?

Russia will make every effort not to allow such an outcome for the
Russian population in Ukraine but it will happen, one way or another,
rather sooner than later.

The Western think-tanks have not even dreamt of such a gift as the one
that the Russians have given them by triggering the war in Ukraine.
Here is a reliable lock for many years and Russia will hardly be
allowed to sort this out. Russia is a militant state, and every
unjustified war ends up with another collapse of Russia.

Furthermore, Crimea is a “cork”, Donbas is a “lock”. Russia stepped
into the 21st century.

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/33134#sthash.HJEns1sF.dpuf

Geoffrey Robertson QC discusses his new book on the Armenian genocid

ABC, Australia
Oct 25 2014

Geoffrey Robertson QC discusses his new book on the Armenian genocide.

Updated Wed at 10:11amWed 22 Oct 2014, 10:11am

Human rights lawyer Geoffrey Robertson QC discusses his new book about
the Armenian genocide, called ‘An Inconvenient Genocide’.

To watch the video of the interview, go to

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-10-22/geoffrey-robertson-qc-discusses-his-new-book-on/5834114

Targeting Christianity

Ottawa Sun, Canada
Oct 26 2014

Targeting Christianity

By Michael Coren

In this excerpt from his new book Hatred: Islam’s War on Christianity,
Michael Coren examines the persecution suffered by Christians in Syria
and Iraq, and where terrorist attacks has resulted in countless deaths
and forced thousands to flee for their lives…

In March 2014, I interviewed Sister Hatune Dogan, a Turkish-born nun
who is a member of the Universal Syrian Orthodox Church under the Holy
See of Antioch. She and her family were forced to leave Turkey when
she was a young girl because of Islamic persecution, and they found
safety and refuge in Germany.

She studied theology and psychotherapy in her adopted country and is
now an accomplished, multilingual woman who has toured the world
extensively and seen humanity at its finest as well as worst. She has
travelled throughout the Islamic world, partly to expose the
persecution of Christians and to try to ease their plights. She has
spent particular time in recent years in Iraq and, most recently, in
Syria. As much as she has seen many examples of atrocity and suffering
over the years and is hardened and experienced, the fate of Syrian
Christians has shocked her.

“I met with a man who had gone out one morning to tend his fields. He
did so in all innocence, as part of his daily routine. He suddenly
looked up and saw a body, then another, then another. All of them with
their heads cut off. He looked to the next field and then to the next
and realized there were hun – dreds of murdered and decapitated people,
all of them Christians. He still shakes even now when he describes the
experience because of the trauma,” she told me.

***

What has occurred in Syria to Christians in particular in the past two
years has been appalling and is all the more hor – rifying because Syria
has been for many years one of the few places in the Arab world where
Christians enjoyed something approaching equality. Ruled by an Arab
nationalist rather than an Islamic ideology, and by the Ba’ath party
under Hafez al-Assad and then his British-educated son Bashar Hafez
al-Assad, Syria with its more than 2.5 million Christians, was a
relatively modern, secular if heavily controlled and policed state.
The Assads ruled despotically, were often oppressive and not at all
democratic or liberal in any genuine sense, but sharia law did not
dominate the body politic, and Assad, himself part of a Muslim
minority sect, gave individual Christians positions of authority and
responsibility, protected Christian communities, and tried to – at
least within an Arab, Islamic context – achieve a relative separation
of mosque and state. This is not in any way to paint Assad’s Syria as
some pluralistic paradise, but for Christians it was, relatively
speaking, a place of freedom in which to live, to work, and to
worship. The largest Christian communities are in Aleppo, Damascus,
and Homs but Christians live – or lived – throughout the country.
Syria claims not to have a state religion but the president has to be
a Muslim and the various Christian churches – Eastern Orthodox,
Eastern Rite Catholic, and various minority groups – are well aware of
the limits to their rights and freedoms.

***

In July 2013, the bodies of seven beheaded Christians were found in
Homs. In November, a Christian section of Damascus was shelled and two
people were killed. Also in November, nine Christian children were
killed by debris when Islamists targeted a Christian school for mortar
attack. In Sadad, six Christians, all members of a single family, were
killed by Islamists. In December 2013, twelve people were killed in a
church when Islamist militia attacked it because it was being used as
a food distribution centre. In August 2014, in Marmarita a Christian
was beheaded when he was discov – ered wearing a crucifix around his
neck; in September 2014, a Christian was executed for refusing to
convert to Islam, and the following month two Christians were
kidnapped and beheaded in Deir Hassan.

The terror is working. Christians have left and are leav – ing. The
situation may improve for them but will never be the same for those
whom they have left behind. The road to Damascus is now stained and
soaked in blood and pain, and some of the oldest churches in the world
have been destroyed or left as relics and lifeless museums of
historical interest. Diasporas of Syrian Christians have now been
created in North America and Europe but their homeland increasingly
becomes Christian-free. It is precisely what many in the Muslim world
have wanted for some time.

While in Iraq there are numerous differences compared to the Syrian
situation, some of the history is eerily similar. Christians had lived
in Iraq since the earliest period of the Christian story, and the
community in that country is one of the oldest and most established
Christian cultures and societies in history. The Chaldeans became
Christian in the first cen – tury, and Iraqi Christians are still mainly
ethnic Chaldeans who speak a form of Eastern Aramaic, but there are
also many Assyrians, Armenians, and Kurds. Denominations are
num – erous, some of them ancient and some modern; they include Chaldean
Catholic, Assyrian Church of the East, Syrian Orthodox, Syriac
Catholic, Armenian Apostolic, Armenian Catholic, Roman Catholic, and
various Protestant churches – so, an established, integral, and
respected part of Iraq and the Middle East. Numbers can be difficult
to establish because of fear on the part of Christians to
self-identify and also due to state reluctance to give detailed
information, or because some in authority want to deny the genuine
size and significance of minorities. It seems, though, that by the
early 1980s there were almost 1.5 million Christians in Iraq, perhaps
9 per cent of the population. Recent figures speak of less than half a
million, living mainly in Baghdad, Basra, Mosul, and Arbil, and some
believe that the figure is closer to a mere two hundred thousand.

Like Syria, Iraq had long been ruled by a secular form of Arab
nationalism and a local version of Ba’athism. Saddam Hussein was also
a despot but an even more controlling and sadistic leader than
President Assad or his father. Partly as a policy of divide and
conquer but also out of a genuine commit – ment to an Arab state that
rejected Islamic fundamentalism and oppression of Arab Christians,
Saddam tolerated and even protected his Christian minority when it was
advantageous to him and his regime. But Iraqi Christians always lived
a tenuous existence and knew they had to be watchful. Yet Saddam’s
deputy and effectively foreign minister for some time was Tariq Aziz,
a Christian at least in name, tribe, and tradition.

With the wars in Iraq, however, and the eventual fall of the brutal
dictatorship of Saddam Hussein, the various Islamic sects in the
country and their foreign Islamic allies began a vir – tual civil war,
and Christians, refusing to participate in the sectarianism and often
falsely perceived as being pro-Western or even pro-Saddam, were
specifically targeted by Islamic mil – itias. It is tragic and perhaps
indicative that a United States led by an evangelical Christian should
lead a war in Iraq that led to the persecution and slaughter of
Christians and the hemor – rhage of these ancient communities of
followers of Jesus Christ from the heartland and homeland of
Christianity. A war fought ostensibly to keep Christians safe in Ohio
and Alabama has made the lives of Christians living in Baghdad and
Mosul com – pletely unbearable.

***

In April 2014, the Chaldean patriarch of Babylon, Mar Louis Raphael i
Sako, head of the Assyrian Chaldean Catholic Church, delivered a long
address concerning the history of Christians and Christianity in the
Middle East and in particu – lar in Iraq. While he criticized Western
intervention and imperialism and called for a just peace in Israel and
Palestine, he also spoke of the reality of Christian life in modern
Iraq:

“About half of all Iraqi Christians, once numbering a mil – lion and a
half, have left the country for fear of violence and religious
persecution, especially after the massacre that took place in Baghdad
in 2010, in the Church of Our Lady of Salvation, and the attack in
Qaraqosh against Christian students on their way to the university.
Taking property away from Christians, who are deemed without rights
because they are not Muslim, threatening letters sent to Christians,
as well as members of other non-Muslim minorities, are making
Christians feel like second-class citizens. Therefore, the question
is, are the men and women who have a great and illustrious past behind
them destined to disappear from Mesopotamia and the land of their
ancestors?”

The answer is that unless and until something changes at the most
fundamental level of Islam and in the Muslim approach to religious
minorities in general and Christians in particular, yes, they will
disappear. Not only in Mesopotamia, but throughout the Middle East.
The battle for Christian continuity in Iraq is, if we are honest,
largely lost, and in Syria matters look bleak indeed. Even at its
best, Christian life in Syria is now dependent on the triumph and
survival of a dicta – tor who is no genuine friend of Christianity and
who has always been regarded by local Christians as a leader to be
toler – ated rather than embraced. Christians from both countries have
fled to various countries, often to Jordan, but there is no guarantee
that the Jordanian royal family with its relatively lib – eral religious
policies will remain in power. There is, simply, nowhere else left to
go in the Middle East. This is a struggle for survival and it is being
lost.

Excerpted from Hatred by Michael Coren. Copyright (c) 2014 Michael
Coren. Reprinted by permission of McClelland & Stewart, a Penguin
Random House Company. All rights reserved.

http://www.ottawasun.com/2014/10/23/targeting-christianity

Armenia’s accession to EEU has nothing in common with NKR recognitio

Armenia’s accession to EEU has nothing in common with NKR recognition
– David Babayan

11:47 * 26.10.14

Armenia’s accession to the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) has nothing
in common with recognition of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR),
David Babayan, Spokesman for the NKR President, told Tert.am, as he
commented on Heritage party Chairman Raffi Hovannisian’s statement
that Armenia must recognize independent NKR before acceding to the
EEU.

“I think that NKR recognition is a pan-Armenian task, and Armenia and
Nagorno-Karabakh are doing their best to achieve this priority goal,”
Mr Babayan said.

The recognition of Nagorno-Karabakh by the Australian state of New
South Wales, a number of US states and organizations is the result of
combined efforts by Armenia, Nagorno-Karabakh and the Armenian
Diaspora.

“As regards the recognition of Artsakh [Nagorno-Karabakh] by Armenia,
I think it will happen some day. However, I believe Armenia must not
be the first to recognize independent Artsakh,” Mr Babayan said.

He does not see any link between recognition of Nagorno-Karabakh and
Armenia’s accession to different unions. Armenia’s became a UN member
when Raffi Hovannisian was Armenia’s FM, and the issue was never
raised.

Armenian News – Tert.am

Crime and Inevitable Punishment

CRIME AND INEVITABLE PUNISHMENT

Friday, 24 October 2014 20:32

A trial against the Azerbaijani subversives, Dilham Askerov
and Shahbaz Guliyev, is scheduled for Monday, October 27, in
Stepanakert. Let’s remind that in mid-July, they penetrated into the
NKR Karvachar region to commit sabotage-reconnaissance and espionage
activities and were captured by the Karabakh security services. The
third member of the subversive group resisted while being captured and
was killed.

During their short stay in the territory of Nagorno Karabakh,
the group members committed a range of crimes, having killed and
wounded a few citizens of the NKR.

Once official information about the detention of the subversives was
reported, Azerbaijan immediately initiated an information campaign
aimed at presenting them as civilians who had gone to the Karvachar
region to… “visit the graves of their relatives and their homes”.
Surely, the Azerbaijani party was and is silent about the fact that
the “walk” was followed by the killing of innocent civilians,
including a teenager, as well as wounding a woman. Like in any
self-respecting state, a criminal case was initiated in the Artsakh
Republicand after the completion of the investigation it was forwarded
to the court.

With the approach of the trial date, the above mentioned propaganda
campaign, comprising both state and public structures of Azerbaijan,
is gaining momentum. Corresponding statements were issued by the
ministries of foreign affairs and defense; a campaign titled “Save the
Hostages>> was launched in social networks in five languages –
Azerbaijani, English, Russian, French, and even Armenian. We can even
say that the issue was raised to the international level.During the
recent visit of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmen to the region,
President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev … urged the mediators to raise
the issue of the soonest release of the Azerbaijani subversives by
Armenia. According to Minister of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan Elmar
Mammadyarov, during Aliyev’s meeting with the co-chairmen in Baku, the
main issue was the return of the Azerbaijani captives. In other words,
for the Azerbaijani leader the return of the criminals is more
important than the conflict settlement process. Apparently, Aliyev’s
successful experience of extradition from Hungary and the subsequent
pardon of the “Budapest killer”, who hacked to death a sleeping
Armenian officer, inspired him, gaining the laurels of the criminal’s
savior at home. To be frank, they were bloody laurels.

But, let’s return to the coming trial, which is zealously opposed by
Azerbaijan. And what is the argument of the Azerbaijani party?
According to official Baku, holding a trial against Azerbaijani
citizens in the unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh Republic has no grounds,
and the decision taken by the court cannot have any legal force.
Apparently, the Azerbaijani leadership believes that one can commit
crimes in the territory of the unrecognized Republic without any
punishment, including the heaviest crime of war aimed at annihilating
the self-determined people, using even weapons of mass destruction
banned by international conventions against the civilians. But, any
crime must be followed by inevitable punishment, irrespective of the
recognition or non-recognition of the country, in which it was
committed. As forNagorno Karabakh, regardless of the will of the
criminal authorities of Azerbaijan, it is a subject of international
law with all the ensuing consequences, including legal for the
Azerbaijanis who have committed a crime against our Republic and its
citizens.

Since the declaration of its independence, the Nagorno Karabakh
Republic has taken the path of creating a democratic and legitimate
state, which recognizes and respects the rule of law. The legislative
basis, created during the years of independence and regulating the
political and social-economic relations in the Republic, fully comply
with the norms and principles of international law and does not
contradict them, as recognized by many independent reputable experts.
Based on this legislation, a judicial power has been formed and is
effectively functioning in the NKR, and it will commit an act of
justice over the Azerbaijani subversives. There is no doubt that the
verdict by the NKR court will be objective, unlike Azerbaijan, the
totalitarian regime of which has usurped all the power branches and is
committing legal arbitrariness. The resonant story of the arrest of
prominent human rights activists Leyla Yunus and her husband Arif
Yunus, Intigam Aliyev and Rasul Jafarov, who are accused of alleged
espionage in favor of Armenia, as well as dozens of other opponents of
the current power are an eloquent testimony of this. It isn’t
accidental that the Human Rights Watch international human rights
organization called upon the French President, Francois Hollande, to
urge Aliyev at the upcoming meeting with him in Paris to release the
noted four arrested human rights activists. We believe that the
President of Azerbaijan should be concerned about the release of the
noted captives and not the fate of the outright killers.

And the last thing. Aliyev, who grossly violates the democratic and
constitutional rights in his own country, is also violating the rules
of diplomatic ethics, DEMANDING that the co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk
Group contribute to the release of the saboteurs. Meanwhile, after
passing the court verdict on this case in Stepanakert, he can only
appeal to the NKR leadership to extradite the criminals, especially
that he has such an experience with Hungary. And the adoption of a
decision is purely the prerogative of the authorities of the Republic
of Artsakh.

Leonid MARTIROSSIAN

Editor-in-Chief of Azat Artsakh newspaper

http://artsakhtert.com/eng/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1591:-crime-and-inevitable-punishment&catid=3:all&Itemid=4

UN forecasts 0.5 percent population growth for Armenia in 2014

UN forecasts 0.5 percent population growth for Armenia in 2014

YEREVAN, October 24. / ARKA /. Armenia may see its population grow by
0.5 percent this year as the birth rate exceeds the death rate, said
today Garik Hayrapetyan, the representative of the Armenian office of
the UN Population Fund.

“According to our estimates, in 2017 Armenia’s population will begin
to decrease because of two factors- the falling birth rate and the
aging of the nation,” he said.

He said the number of people aged 65 and over will increase along with
mounting death rate. He said the death rate currently is 27-28 per
one thousand people – ‘a normal rate for aging nations.’

As regards birth rate, Hayrapetyan said it is now 1.5-1.6 per a woman,
which is not enough for the simple reproduction, especially with
ongoing out-emigration when 30,000-35,000 people of mostly
reproductive age leave the country for good annually.

According to the National Statistical Service, on July 1, 2014 Armenia
had 3.009 million permanent population, including 1.9 billion of urban
population.

The number of children born in the country in January – June this year
increased by 3.2% compared to the same period of 2013, amounting to
19,401. The number of deaths during the reporting period increased by
4.3% to 14,929. The natural population growth was 4, 472 people. -0

http://arka.am/en/news/society/un_forecasts_0_5_percent_population_growth_for_armenia_in_2014/#sthash.xxHLiaZS.dpuf

Medvedev: Russian Customs Officers Should Team Up With Eurasian Econ

Medvedev: Russian Customs Officers Should Team Up With Eurasian
Economic Union Countries

Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said that customs officers are
now facing major new challenges associated primarily with the creation
of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU).

© RIA Novosti
16:01 25/10/2014

Related News

Armenia Lacks Alternatives to Eurasian Economic Union Membership: Researcher
Eurasian Economic Community Leaders Sign Group Abolition Agreement
Putin Urges Eurasian Economic Union Solidarity on Ukraine’s European Integration
Belarusian President Signs Law on Eurasian Economic Union Treaty Ratification

MOSCOW, October 25 (RIA Novosti) – Russian Prime Minister Dmitry
Medvedev congratulated the personnel, veterans and employees of the
Federal Customs Service on their professional holiday noting that
Russian customs officers should work closely with their colleagues
from Belarus, Kazakhstan and Armenia, the Russian Cabinet’s website
reported Saturday.

“Russian customs officers should work closely with their counterparts
from Belarus, Kazakhstan and Armenia, in order to ensure free movement
of goods, services, capital and labor. It is important to improve the
quality of customs administration, actively introduce advanced
information technologies, including electronic declaration,” the Prime
Minister was quoted as saying.

The Russian prime minister said that customs officers are now facing
major new challenges associated primarily with the creation of the
Eurasian Economic Union(EEU), also known as the Eurasian Union (EAU)
which will begin its work on January 1, 2015.

On October 10, the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Community
(EurAsEC) Russia, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, and Tajikistan
formally dissolved the group to prepare for the EEU’s launch in 2015.

Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan signed the treaty to create the
Eurasian Economic Union in May and have already ratified the document.
The EEU leaders also signed an agreement on Armenia’s accession to the
EEU Treaty. The agreement brings together 170 million people onto a
common market, with the aim of launching the development of domestic
trade, economic and cooperative ties, increased competitiveness of
national production and stronger positions in the global economic
system.

The republics of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan have also expressed
interest in joining the organization.

http://en.ria.ru/russia/20141025/194582540/Medvedev-Russian-Customs-Officers-Should-Team-Up-With-Eurasian.html

Lithuania and Armenia have untapped opportunities to boost their tra

Lithuania and Armenia have untapped opportunities to boost their trade relations

YEREVAN, October 24. / ARKA /. Lithuania and Armenia have untapped
opportunities to boost their trade relations, Lithuania’s foreign
minister Linas Linkevicius said today in Yerevan during a joint press
conference with his Armenian counterpart Edward Nalbandian.

“There is great potential for the development of our relations. The
trade between the two countries is not yet able to impress, but we see
the potential,”said Linkevicius

He stressed that both Lithuania and the European Union are ready to
develop relations with Armenia in all spheres looking at it as a
partner, “but the only question is to what extent it is compatible
with political course chosen by Armenia’.”

In turn, Edward Nalbandian singled out the opening of embassies in
both countries and frequented visits.
“The Armenian side is interested in further development of bilateral
relations. I would like to underline the importance of the
Armenian-Lithuanian intergovernmental commission, which contributes to
further deepening of our relations,” he added.

Nalbandian also commended Lithuania for recognition of the Armenian Genocide.

Nalbandian said he and his opposite number discussed international
issues, the Ukrainian crisis, the situation in the Middle East and
touched upon the peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.
Armenian-Lithuanian trade turnover in 2013 stood at $3.4 million. .-0–

http://arka.am/en/news/economy/lithuania_and_armenia_have_untapped_opportunities_to_boost_their_trade_relations_/#sthash.SC3SWuRc.dpuf

Troika Rally: Tsarukyan calls for leadership of "new quality"

Troika Rally: Tsarukyan calls for leadership of “new quality”

POLITICS | 24.10.14 | 19:47

Gagik Tsarukyan, the leader of the opposition-leaning Prosperous
Armenia Party (PAP), has called for leadership and politics of new
quality as he addressed on Friday evening another well-attended rally
in Yerevan’s Liberty Square organized by the informal coalition of
three parliamentary minority parties.

He called for breaking the monopoly of the current government, saying
that the emerging movement was for a transition of power in a peaceful
way rather than through a Maidan-like revolution. “But stagnation
should not be an alternative to Maidan,” he emphasized, in reference
to the change of government in Ukraine through what became known as
Maidan protests earlier this year.

In his speech Tsarukyan repeatedly emphasized that he will remain
standing “next to the people” until the movement achieves success,
urging the current leadership to comply with the troika’s earlier
demands concerning social and economic issues. At the same time, the
PAP leader announced that the movement will be forming headquarters of
activists throughout Armenia that will be ready for mobilization
“whenever is necessary”.

Tsarukyan said that the option of organizing a sit-in could be
discussed at the next rally, but neither he nor the leaders of the
Armenian National Congress (ANC) and Heritage, the two other parties
making up the troika, announced the date of the next rally.

In his speech ANC leader Levon Ter-Petrosyan, who unsuccessfully ran
for presidency against current President Serzh Sargsyan in 2008, said
that the three parties had a common strategy of achieving a power
change, but said they would not make their tactics public.

Heritage Party leader Raffi Hovannisian, who was Sargsyan’s main
challenger in the 2013 presidential election, repeated his demand to
the current administration that he made back then – to share the power
with the people and resign. He called on the leadership to organize
preterm presidential and parliamentary elections within the next six
months.

http://armenianow.com/news/politics/57940/armenia_opposition_troika_rally_gagik_tsarukyan