BAKU: Azerbaijan Gets a Jump on Its Neighbours in Developing Caspian

AZERBAIJAN GETS A JUMP ON ITS NEIGHBOURS IN DEVELOPING CASPIAN SEA OIL

BAKU’S OIL BOOM
(August 08, 06)

By SCOTT TAYLOR

BAKU, Azerbaijan– "It’s getting too bloody soft around here for my
liking," says Terry, a 46-year-old ex-British paratrooper who now runs
a bar in Baku. "It used to be the case that the sight of a foreigner
in Azerbaijan was so rare that the locals would stop and gawk at you
when you walked down the street."

Missing a front tooth and sporting a shaved head, the barrel-chested
combat veteran would likely still create a stir in most civil
societies. But over the past decade the renewed oil boom has brought
a cast of such characters into this previously isolated former Soviet
republic.

In 1994, the newly independent Azerbaijani government signed a deal
with several Western companies to develop and export the vast, untapped
offshore oil and gas reserves in the Caspian Sea. British Petroleum
is the key player in this region, with established pipelines through
neighbouring Kazakhstan. The experience gained in its North Sea oil
projects has given BP a tremendous advantage in the international
race to develop the Caspian Sea reserves. As a result, Azerbaijan has
kept well ahead of the other four nations who share a border on this
newly discovered wealth.

"The Russians, Iranians, Kazakhs and Turkmens have no idea how much
oil we are already pumping through (BP’s) oil rigs," said Terry, who
spent 10 years in the region as a BP employee before opening his pub,
the Garage, which caters strictly to foreign oil workers. "Our gap
on the competition in terms of technology would need to be measured
in light-years."

The outer-space analogy is appropriate, as a patron in the Garage
describes expatriate bars in Baku as being like the intergalactic
nightclub in the Star Wars movies, "only instead of strange individuals
from foreign planets, they are bizarre representatives from across
the globe."

The original bars and clubs were deliberately rough around the edges
to appeal to the mostly ex-military types who blazed the trail through
this previously non-Westernized territory. For instance, at the Garage
they serve bowls of free hot french fries at the bar instead of the
traditional peanuts ("I’m an Englishman, not a monkey," says Terry
when asked about this custom). But as the boom in the Azerbaijan
economy — 25 per cent growth last year in GDP alone — spreads into
sectors outside the oil industry, the hospitality business has begun
to cater to a much greater variety of foreign tastes.

"First it was McDonald’s, then a whole bunch of fancy restaurants
and now we’ve even got expensive wine bars," bemoaned the Garage’s
owner. "Baku will never be the same."

This recent wave of change will not be the first time outside forces
have left an indelible imprint on Azeri society and culture. As
descendents of central Asian Turkic tribes, the Azeris are essentially
Muslim Turkmen. But in 1920, Russian Bolsheviks occupied the oil-rich
territory of the current Republic of Azerbaijan. The subsequent seven
decades of communism and Russian influence drastically diminished
the Islamic influence in this region.

Throughout my weeklong visit I spotted just one Azeri woman wearing
a traditional hijab; most dressed in Western-style, MTV-inspired
fashions. Although minarets and mosques still dot the cityscape, the
call to prayers is not broadcast over loudspeakers five times a day.

Culturally, the long period of Soviet control has left an ongoing
legacy of authoritarianism. Journalists are still escorted about the
city by official handlers wearing dark suits and driving old black
Volgas, once considered a "Mercedes equivalent" in the Soviet Union.
On the plus side, many of the hosted luncheons were capped off by the
Russian tradition of exchanging elaborate toasts with over-proof vodka
— certainly not something one would expect from a member nation of
the Organization of the Islamic Conference.

The impact of the sudden economic boom in Azerbaijan is illustrated
by the two separate currencies. The worn-out manats are valued at
4,800 US, while the crisp new (Yeni) mantas trade in at about $1.20
US. Of course, with such a tremendous influx of foreigners, a lot of
international currency is also accepted in the marketplace, although
Canadian dollars have yet to be introduced.

"It is regrettable that we have achieved the lowest of co-operation
from Canada among all of the world’s developed nations," says Novruz
Mammadov, special adviser to the president. "It is frustrating
for us when we see so little interest in something which holds so
much potential." Canada is alone among the G8 nations to have no
diplomatic representation in Baku, and the nearest consular functions
are conducted either in Ankara, Turkey or Moscow.

"In the 15 years since independence, Canada has sent just two official
delegations to visit our country, one from your foreign ministry in
2005 and some members of Parliament back in 2003," says Mammadov

The Azeris, on the other hand, maintain a full embassy in Ottawa and
are keen to encourage Canadian trade. After years of Soviet communism
and post-collapse instability, the Azerbaijan infrastructure is in
need of just about every commodity conceivable. Add to this the vast
oil revenues and ongoing development in the region, and the Azeri
government is in a cash-rich position to acquire its needs.

"You have to remember that we are starting from absolute zero —
we need just about everything," said Mammadov. "There are still
tremendous opportunities for international companies in the energy
field, telecommunications, agriculture, electronics — the list is
endless. And we have the revenue to pay for it."

One drawback to foreign investment is that in the immediate post-Soviet
climate, corruption was rife. Every level of government — right down
to the policeman on the street — wanted a piece of the huge windfall
that was expected to follow development of the oil fields. But as
the volume of foreign business increases, such practices are being
more seriously challenged.

An ad in a Baku English-language daily newspaper calls upon foreign
corporations to create an investor forum to fight corruption.
It’s not easy doing business in Azerbaijan, reads the headline.
Corruption? Unfair practices? Vague regulations? Unjust courts?
Monopolies? Unseen traps for investors? Together, let’s try to
change things!

Another sign that the flow of new money is having an impact is that
the police are no longer as aggressive in their encounters with
foreign nationals. "One night the local police stopped a BP employee
on his way home from the bar. When he refused to pay them the usual
‘We’ll let you go this time’ bribe, they locked him in jail," said
Hermann Lehmann, a six-year veteran on the Azerbaijan oil scene.

"The next day, when he informed his bosses at BP, they immediately
demanded justice and heads rolled at the police station. Believe me,
money talks in Baku."

A reputable free press has yet to be established in Azerbaijan. A
recent report by the international watchdog agency Freedom House
strongly criticized the ruling party (New Azerbaijan Party) for
"eroding democracy" through media controls. The chairman of the
Azerbaijan Press Council, Aflatun Amashov, admits journalism in his
country has no credibility but says the problem is a lack of control.

"There are 3,000 registered newspapers in Azerbaijan, most funded
by various political interests, and there is no control mechanism
to challenge libellous statements," he said. "Everyone is free to
publish what they want. You can even libel the president without
real fear of recrimination. As a result, the media reports have
become so contradictory and sprinkled with lies that no one knows
what to believe."

Amashov and his council are lobbying the government for more money
for independent media to diminish their vulnerability to political
pressure. They are also working on initiatives such as freedom of
information legislation to help build a legitimate news media. "These
things will inevitably take some time," said Amashov. "You cannot
create a climate for a western-style free press overnight."

Westernizing Azerbaijan seems to be the cornerstone of government
policy. Virtually every official I interviewed proclaimed: "We are
a European nation — our values are oriented toward the West." Given
the country’s pivotal location in the Caucasus region, this shift in
attitude threatens to alter the international trade balance.

When Alexander the Great conquered Baku in the third century BC, he
proclaimed it to be "the gateway to China" — the vital link between
eastern and western civilizations. In addition to development of
the Caspian Sea oil reserves with western corporations, Azerbaijan
is also the key link in the newly built Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan pipeline.
The pipeline is already carrying vast amounts of oil through Georgia
to the Turkish Mediterranean seaport of Ceyhan; within a few months,
it is expected to deliver one million barrels of oil per day.

Tension between the U.S. and Iran also puts the Azeris in a very
delicate situation. In addition to the 8.5 million people living
in the independent Republic of Azerbaijan, about 17 million ethnic
Azeris live within the borders of Iran. This division occurred in 1828,
when Imperialist Russia and Iran divided the territory.

Azeris constitute about one-third of Iran’s population. Although until
recently the nationalist sentiment of Azeri-Iranians has been tempered
by their strict adherence to the Shiite fundamentalist movement,
there are indications that a rift is developing between them and the
Persian majority.

In May, Iranian newspapers published a controversial cartoon that
depicted Azeri-Iranians as cockroaches too dumb to realize what
they were. This prompted several days of violent protests throughout
northern Iran, culminating in a riot in the town of Naghadeh that left
four protesters dead and more than 70 injured. Iranian authorities were
quick to respond by arresting the cartoonist and editor responsible
for the offending graphic, and calls rang out for the impeachment of
the interior minister for the mishandling of the crisis.

Naturally, Tehran blamed the U.S. State Department for trying to ignite
the flames of Azeri nationalism. During the wave of demonstrations,
U.S. agencies and nationalists in Azerbaijan used the Internet
and radio broadcasts to whip up protesters. While the Azerbaijani
government denies that any policy exists to establish stronger links
to Azeri-Iranians, it does recognize there will only be an increase
in such sentiments in the coming years.

"What do you think will happen when Azeri-Iranians look north of
their border and see their brothers enjoying a prosperous democratic
lifestyle with all the western amenities which they are denied?"
asked Samad Seyidov, director of the foreign relations committee to
the European Union.

Another concern for Tehran as the U.S. steps up the sabre-rattling
is the ever-increasing military ties between Azerbaijan and NATO.
Although officially denied, the presence of British and American
forces along the Azerbaijan-Iran border is an open secret throughout
Baku. More openly, the government proudly proclaims its contributions
to the U.S.-led war against terrorism. "We have troops in Iraq,
Afghanistan and Kosovo; furthermore, as a secular Islamic nation
that recognizes and has good relations with the state of Israel,
I believe we are a key ally of the United States," said Seyidov

How deep that relationship has developed may soon be put to the
test over the unresolved issue of the Armenian occupation of the
Nagorno-Karabakh region, now mainly under Armenian control.

The Azeri-Armenian conflict over Armenian separatist aspirations
in Nagorno-Karabakh dates back more than a century. Although the
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe has recommended
that inhabitants of the region, mostly of Armenian descent, be allowed
to vote on their area’s fate, Azerbaijan has said it cannot agree to
the region’s secession.

"With the completion of the B.T.C. pipeline, their increased military
capability and key regional strategic significance, the Azerbaijanis
have certainly increased their bargaining position (with regards
to Nagorno-Karabakh)," said one Baku-based U.S. official. "However,
you have to remember that there are 1.2 million Armenians residing
in America and they are too powerful a lobby to ignore."

While Armenia cannot keep pace with Azerbaijan’s recent arms build-up,
it can still count on potential political and possible military support
from both Russia and Iran. Armenia’s tactical deterrent to any Azeri
military offensive to retake the occupied territory is the threat
of missile strikes against Azerbaijan’s oil infrastructure. The
new pipeline tops the list of potential targets. For their part,
Azeri military officials are coy about any possible time frame for
an offensive, but they are convinced the disputed territory will one
day be back under their control.

"Sooner or later we will come to terms with the Armenians, given
the steady growth of (Azerbaijan’s) military strength," said
Maj.-Gen. Ramiz Najafov. "Up until now we have shown patience in our
resolve for a peaceful solution, but our patience is not endless."

For the foreign ex-pats in Baku, it is apparent that the Azeri
government has very limited options in dealing with this conflict.
"Before he died, the old man (Heydar Aliyev) promised that he would
take (Nagorno-Karabakh) back," said Terry, the publican. (Aliyev
was the former member of the Soviet politburo who led the country
to independence from the Soviets in 1991.) "Now he is revered as a
virtual saint and as president, his son (Ilham Aliyev) has inherited
that legacy. It’s not a matter of ‘if,’ but rather when they try to
settle this again."

In the meantime, the oil continues to flow, the revenue pours in and
Azerbaijan sits at the vortex of what is a potential perfect storm
of geopolitical, cultural and strategic interests.

staylor

Scott Taylor is a columnist for The Chronicle Herald and
editor-in-chief of the military affairs magazine Esprit de Corps.
Second of a two-part series by The Chronicle Herald’s military
affairs columnist.

Armenia has problems with internet access

ARMENIA HAS PROBLEMS WITH INTERNET ACCESS

Arka News Agency, Armenia
Aug. 7, 2006

YEREVAN, August 7. /ARKA/. Armenia still has problems with Internet
access, beginning from Friday the connection is unstable.

At present access to Internet is almost impossible, connection to
foreign Websites is extremely difficult.

During recent three days two big damages have happened on fiber-optic
cable passing through the territory of Georgia.

Arminco Global Telecommunications, largest local provider company
informed ARKA News Agency that according to the information centre of
"ArmenTel", on the territory of Georgia on August 5 at 02:00 o’clock
(local time) fiber-optic cable on the Sochi-Poti section was damaged.

As a result, OTEGLOBE VOIP E3 and UKRTEL E3 have technical problems.

Reconstruction work is being done, Arminco reports.

A day earlier, on August 4 at 11:55 o’clock the cable was caused
rather big damaged on Kutaisi- Zestafon section, which caused cut of
the Internet connection in Armenia.

ArmenTel supplies Armenia with internet only through Georgia by means
of the only cable passing through the bottom of Black Sea.

Armenia Telephone Company enjoys the sole right to supply internet
access to Armenian internet providers. Since 1997, 90% of ArmenTel’s
shares belong to Greek OTE Company while the remaining 10% belong to
the Armenian government. S.P.-0–

Internet down in Armenia again due to accident in Georgia – agency

Internet down in Armenia again due to accident in Georgia – agency

Regnum, Moscow
5 Aug 06

5 August: Armenia’s population has been twice deprived of Internet
within the past two days. A Regnum correspondent reported by phone from
Yerevan yesterday [4 August] that disruption to Armenian providers’
operation on 4 and 5 August had been caused by an accident on the
fibre optic communications cable in Georgia.

ArmenTel company, the national operator with exclusive rights to
provide international telecommunications from Armenia, said that
the cable had been damaged near the town of Kutaisi on 4 August that
caused a six-hour disruption in Internet. Today the cable was damaged
on the Black Sea bed, the company’s press service said. There is no
information as to when the link will be restored.

The Armenian government considers the development of information
technologies as the main priority of the country’s economy. Meanwhile,
the country is very vulnerable because its communications are connected
via the only cable that goes from Armenia to Ukraine through Georgia
and the Black Sea bed. In the south, the cable is connected to Iran’s
communications. The current incident is the third major accident on
the cable in Georgia.

OSCE MG Co-Chairs to Meet in Paris August 2

OSCE MG Co-Chairs to Meet in Paris August 2

PanARMENIAN.Net
01.08.2006 14:25 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ US Ambassador Matthew Bryza, the OSCE Minsk Group
co-chair, intends to inform in Paris his fellow co-chairs about the
results of the visit to the Nagorno Karabakh conflict region. Bryza
briefed about it in Baku on 1 August as a result of consultations
held at the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry.

The diplomat said that the talks with Azerbaijani authorities did
not concern the Azerbaijani-U.S. cooperation. "As a co-chair of the
OSCE Minsk Group I want to hear the opinions by President and Foreign
Minister on the peaceful resolution of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict,"
Bryza stressed, reports Trend.

Bryza: Elections do not hinder negotiations on Karabakh

Bryza: Elections do not hinder negotiations on Karabakh

Regnum, Russia
July 31, 2006

"I see there is a political will to solve the question; philosophy
laid in the basis of our proposals, is acceptable," OSCE Minsk Group
US co-Chair Matthew Bryza stated to Radio Liberty after his meeting
with Armenian President Robert Kocharyan.

Speaking on proposals’ details, he stressed that there are questions,
connected with Kelbajar and Lachin, as well as conducting a
referendum. Matthew Bryza confirmed that, according to OSCE MG
co-chairs, Nagorno Karabakh people should solve the question of
Karabakh’s status itself. "However, the question is who should be
considered to be Karabakh people. There are people, who lived there
in 1988 and who wish to participate in the referendum too," Mr. Bryza
stated. "All these questions should be processed as a part of single
package." "Principles, which are now on the negotiation table, are no
agreement. They are just principles, proposals. Hence, an agreement
is unavoidable, if there is no such yet," he stressed.

Answering a question, whether there is a chance to reach an agreement
within this year or whether the question will be postponed till 2009,
Mr. Bryza said: "Of course, there is a chance. It would be favorable
for presidents of both countries to appear at the elections with a
settled problem. However, elections do not prevent from negotiations.

Simply, the question is much easier to be solved, when political
processes are not escalated." At the same time, the US diplomat
stressed that the OSCE MG is ready to act until parties seriously
consider the talks: "We see that our friends in Armenia consider the
question quite seriously."

Mentioning situation with democracy in Armenia, Mr. Bryza said:
"We hope that Armenia moves in a right direction. The US-Armenian
relations will be the stronger; the Armenian democracy will be
stronger. Armenia’s participation in the Millennium Challenge Program
is the best evidence for the US to be sure that Armenia is moving
forward on a democratic way. Democracy is a process."

RA MFA: Armenia Ready for Cooperation on Ecology Issues with Baku

RA MFA: Armenia Ready for Cooperation on Ecology Issues with Baku

PanARMENIAN.Net
31.07.2006 16:40 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Yerevan attaches importance to the creation of
atmosphere of trust in the region and is ready to cooperate on ecology
issues with the Azeri side, RA Foreign Ministry’s Acting Spokesman
Vladimir Karapetian told a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter.

For his part, head of the department of press and information policy
at the Azeri MFA Tahir Taghizade remarked that Azerbaijan is ready
to cooperate with Armenia in order to liquidate the consequences of
the fires at the Karabakh border, reported Trend.

It should be noted that EU Special Representative for the South
Caucasus Peter Semneby said both parties should be interested in
formation of a joint committee for combating fires.

Armenian Fixed Telephone Network Passed Over To Russian Company

ARMENIAN FIXED TELEPHONE NETWORK PASSED OVER TO RUSSIAN COMPANY

YEREVAN, JULY 26, NOYAN TAPAN. The Armenian fixed telephone network,
the monopoly of which belongs to ArmenTel, will be passed over to
the MTS company making part of the Sistema Russian holding. As NT
correspondent was informed from unofficial sources, ArmenTel will be
officially passed over in late August, after an agreement is signed
between the sides.

According to some information, the Russian side is already studying
ArmenTel’s activity on the spot for the purpose of assuming its
management.

As for the ArmenTel’s mobile communication, according to some Russian
media, it will be governed by an international consortium formed with
participation of the Indian VTEL Holding and Knigtsbridge companies.

To recap, the OTE Greek company, to which 90 percent of ArmeTel’s
shares belongs, sells its shares through an international tender,
the organization of which has assumed HSBC bank. The tender results
will be published in early August.

Armenian Defense Minister joins ruling party

ARMENIAN DEFENSE MINISTER JOINS RULING PARTY

EurasiaNet, NY
July 24, 2006

In a widely expected move, Armenia’s Defense Minister Serge Sarkisian
has taken a senior leadership position with the ruling Republican
Party amidst an apparent push by the party to retain its political
weight in upcoming parliamentary and presidential elections.

Sarkisian, often depicted as a favorite to succeed President Robert
Kocharian, was elected as board chairman of the Republican Party of
Armenia (RPA) at a July 22 congress in Yerevan called to amend the
party’s policy platform and regulations. The post of chairman of
the board was reinstated for the elections, and 28 new members were
appointed to the party’s 42-member board. Prime Minister Andranik
Markarian was elected as the party’s president.

Sarkisian’s decision to join the Republican Party has been scrutinized
as an indicator of political strategies to come among Armenia’s ruling
elite in the run-up to the country’s parliamentary elections in 2007
and presidential elections in 2008. But party members have taken pains
to emphasize that the inclusion of Defense Minister Sarkisian and Prime
Minister Markarian only testifies to the government’s political unity.

"No one has a doubt that Serge Sarkisian would be able to create his
own party, as many other politicians did or intended to," commented
parliamentarian Hranush Hakobian, another Republican Party member, in
an interview with Armnews TV. "But he preferred to join the existing
party instead, thus showing his commitment to avoiding conflicts."

Sarkisian told journalists at the congress that he has no rival in
Armenia, and denied reports of an ongoing conflict with President
Kocharian, adding that he has no plans to resign from his post as
defense minister.

In a 90-second speech to congress participants, Sarkisian, speaking
as if already a party veteran, criticized those who had predicted a
split in the RPA in the past and added that the party was determined
to strengthen the spirit of national unity as Armenia takes on new
challenges. At a briefing following the congress, Sarkisian told
reporters that his election as chairman of the Republican Party board
was not an extraordinary event. "I have cooperated with this party
for a long time now," he said, mentioning that he had run in the 2003
parliamentary elections on the RPA’s candidate list, although not as
a party member. "So we have just made a document correspond to the
reality of the situation," he said.

Parliamentary Speaker Tigran Torosian, vice-president of the RPA,
earlier also advanced that view, describing Sarkisian’s decision to
join the party as "nothing strange."

"Of course, Mr Sarksian is an influential person and the RPA is
an influential political party, if not the most influential one,"
Aravot newspaper quoted Torosian as saying on July 20. "His joining
the RPA is natural."

Outside observers have focused on Sarkisian’s own ambitions for the
presidential elections in 2008, but the defense minister and other
senior party officials at the congress kept mum on that score. In
a July 20 interview with Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Sarkisian
claimed that President Kocharian approved his decision to join the
Republican Party, but stressed that he himself has not decided whether
or not to run for president when Kocharian steps down in 2008. Prime
Minister Markarian told reporters after the congress that a decision
about an RPA presidential candidate will be taken only after next
year’s parliamentary elections.

The May 2007 parliamentary elections, however, also did not feature
on the congress’ agenda, but party leaders did not deny that steps
taken at the gathering were in preparation for next year’s vote.
Sarkisian stated that the RPA would work with other parties in the
elections, adding that the ballot "will be the best elections in
Armenia so far. It is because I want them to be."

The congress demonstrated the Republican Party’s growing political
potential. The party now claims more than 30,000 members, twice its
official number in 2004. In recent weeks, scores of new members have
joined the ranks, not least due to rumors about Sarkisian’s expected
decision to register as a member. At least seven government ministers,
many influential regional governors and community heads, as well as
prominent businessmen took part in the party congress.

Torosian told congress participants that the influx of new members
emphasizes the growing importance of Armenian political parties and
the tendency for consolidation to capitalize on those gains. Torosian
argued that this is a consequence of the constitutional amendments
adopted last November, which enhance the role of the parliament
vis-a-vis the president.

According to Suren Zolian, an independent political analyst, the RPA
stands to take as many as half of the next parliament’s 131 seats.
(Serge Sarkisian himself has said that he would be glad if the
party could win 21 percent of the vote.) However, another political
scientist, Manvel Sarkisian of the Kavkaz Analytical Center, believes
the situation is not that simple. Kocharian and his entourage will more
likely support Bargavach Hayastan, or Prosperous Armenia, a new party
that has been cast as part of the campaign for a "liberal, democratic
Armenia" backed by the West, commented Sarkisian, who is no relation
to the defense minister. While terming the congress an "unprecedented
event in Armenian history" since the ruling party has no explicit
support from the president or "a foreign country," Sarkisian predicted
that conflicts with Prosperous Armenia are likely since the party has
"recruited those who were not allowed to join Bargavach Hayastan."

For now, though, the RPA is taking pains to emphasize its
alignment with the Armenian and Western mainstream. Founded in
1990 as a nationalist party, the group now describes itself as a
"national-conservative party."

"We are a classical conservative party, for which the basic values
are: God, nation, motherland, traditional family, a stable system of
moral values, a liberal economy," Prime Minister Andranik Markarian
said in a speech addressing the congress.

Editor’s Note: Haroutiun Khachatrian is a Yerevan-based writer
specializing in economic and political affairs.

NATO wishes to reconcile Armenia & Azerbaijan

NATO WISHES TO RECONCILE ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN;
In exchange for a compromise the conflicting parties are offered economic benefits

Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
July 24, 2006 Monday

By Sokhbet Mamedov

PRESIDENT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY OF NATO PIERRE LELUCH
PREPARED PROPOSALS FOR NAGORNO-KARABAKH REGULATION; President of the
parliamentary assembly of NATO Pierre Leluch will visit Azerbaijan
and Armenia.

President of the parliamentary assembly of NATO Pierre Leluch will
visit Azerbaijan and Armenia. For Baku and Yerevan, he has proposals
for resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

After abolishment of the planned meetings of presidents Ilkham Aliyev
and Robert Kocharjan planned this year, two times the parliamentary
assembly of NATO decided to sit them down at a table of negotiations.

A source in the parliament of Azerbaijan reported that president
of the assembly Pierre Leluch already prepared proposals for the
presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia that he would present to them
in autumn during his visit to these countries.

According to the source, Leluch will propose several measures to the
parties of the conflict that will allow "avoidance of political and
other difficulties after signing a peaceful agreement." The president
of the parliamentary assembly promises economic dividends to the
parties in exchange for compromises. So far, Baku and Yerevan prefer
not to say what kind of economic benefits are offered.

This is the second time when Leluch tries to join the negotiation
process carried out under the aegis of the Minsk group of OSCE where
Russia, US and France are co-chairs. Back in May, Leluch invited
presidents Aliyev and Kocharjan to Paris to take part in the spring
session of the parliamentary assembly. Kocharjan ignored the invitation
then, referring to "business."

According to analyst Alpay Akhmed, Yerevan has to build its relations
with NATO looking back at Moscow that is discontent with active
cooperation of its loyal ally in the Caucasus with NATO. Besides,
in the future this cooperation may grow into a wish to become a
member of this organization. Incidentally, such symptoms are already
observed. In spring, speaker of Armenian parliament Artur Bagdasaryan
visited Europe and spoke about possible entrance of Armenia in NATO
and European Union. However, such liberty of the speaker encountered
harsh critique of the President and Bagdasaryan had to resign.

As for Ilkham Aliyev, lately he has been focusing attention in
every speech on "non-constructive stance of the Armenian part at the
negotiations." Recently Aliyev announced that "a chance is given to
Armenia to liberate the occupied Azerbaijani territories voluntarily
and to solve the problem without bloodshed and war."

According to local analysts, such harsh statement by the Azerbaijani
leader can be taken as a response to the recent statement of the
co-chairs of the Minsk group of OSCE where they actually confessed
their helplessness and laid responsibility for resolving the conflict
on heads of the states of the two countries. This means that the
negotiation process has come to a dead end. The cease-fire regime is
very fragile and there are no international separating forces between
the parties of the conflict, which means that an undesirable incident
is not ruled out at any moment. Official Baku also hints that it is
not going to take part in fruitless negotiations.

Source: Nezavisimaya Gazeta, July 20, 2006, p. EV

BAKU: Mammadyarov: Azerbaijan appreciates Pakistan’s support in sett

FM MAMMADYAROV: "AZERBAIJAN APPRECIATES PAKISTAN’S SUPPORT IN SETTLEMENT OF KARABAKH CONFLICT"
[July 21, 2006, 22:13:28]

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
July 21 2006

Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan Elmar Mammadyarov on 21 July met the
ambassador of Pakistan to Azerbaijan Mohammad Hafiz on completion of
his diplomatic mission in the country.

The Ambassador expressed pleasure with the works done for strengthening
of the friendly and cooperation links between two countries during his
activity, thanked the Azerbaijan Government for help rendered to him.

M. Hafiz expressed gratitude for Azerbaijan’s support on the
international organizations, in particular, in conducting reforms in
the United Nations. He stressed the necessity of expansion of links
also in the economic field.

Minister Mammadyarov, noting the close friendship ties between
the two nations, especially emphasized ‘Pakistan’s fair stance in
support of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan in settlement of
the Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorno Karabakh conflict’.