‘The Great And Holy War:’ How World War I Became A Religious Crusade

‘THE GREAT AND HOLY WAR:’ HOW WORLD WAR I BECAME A RELIGIOUS CRUSADE AND RESHAPED THE RELIGIOUS LAND

Wilson County News, TX
Nov 5 2014

By Dr. Robert H. Clemm

Historian Fritz Stern once remarked that the Great War was the
“first calamity of the 20th century, the calamity from which all
other calamities sprang.” On the centenary of World War I there
is an overwhelming sensation of futility in the war’s outbreak,
its nature, and its legacies. WWI seems to have encapsulated the
brutality, emptiness, and fatalism that would become the hallmarks
of the 20th century.

The war destroyed the world that existed in 1914; it toppled four
empires, created the first communist state, and destroyed the
confidence of western civilization. An entire generation seems to
speak with one voice in Erich Maria Remarque’s “All Quiet on the
Western Front” that “the war has ruined us for everything.”

Working against this conventional wisdom is Philip Jenkins. In his
masterful book, “The Great and Holy War: How World War I Became a
Religious Crusade,” Jenkins argues that WWI was not only a “thoroughly
religious event” but an event which drew the global religious map as
we understand it today.

The religious character of WWI has often been seen in the polarization
of either extreme secularization or extreme spiritualism. One
view sees the Christian church as morally compromised by the
conflict–Jenkins himself noting a 1916 poem describing the “church
dead or polluted.” Frequently, 1914 is viewed as the tipping point to
the secularization of the 20th century. The other view is ascribed to
spiritualist sightings of angels in “No Man’s Land” or in the post-war
fascination with seances. Jenkins moderates these extremes through a
global examination of religion both before and after the war. While he
does not dismiss secularization as a trend within western Christianity,
he contextualizes the European response and suggests it was more the
exception rather than the rule.

As soldiers rallied to the colors to defend their nations, so
did churchmen stand ready to drape those soldiers in religious
iconography. Pastors readily painted their enemies as being in league
with the devil while also clothing their soldiers in the language of
the martyrs. Germany depicted their soldiers as crusaders defending
their homeland, while the Allies saw religious significance to their
capture of Jerusalem. As the war dragged on and seemed to unleash the
Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, clerics easily saw their figurative
specter galloping across the globe as well.

What might be most jarring for American readers, steeped in the
Jeffersonian ethos of separation between church and state, was how
readily American churches adopted this crusading rhetoric. It was not
a militarist or politician who declared that he “would have driven my
bayonet into the throat or the eye or stomach of the Huns without the
slightest hesitation,” but a Methodist minister. Jenkins traces how
these close associations discredited religion. This led to gradual
secularization and two wildly different trends. In Germany and Soviet
Russia, the religious aspirations and rhetoric became affixed to the
new “secular messiahs” of these two regimes in the post-war period.

The collapse of the old church-state model, however, laid the
groundwork for Christian Democrats and Catholic politicians to chart
a future along a non-national path of European identity.

It wasn’t just Christianity but all of the Abrahamic religions that
were changed by the war. The religious center of Christianity began to
shift towards Asia and Africa. In fact, Africa may become the largest
Christian continent in the world by 2030. As much as the Christian map
expanded it also contracted during governmental persecution of Armenian
and Russian Orthodox religious enclaves. The war was a double-edged
sword for Judaism. Zionism became practicable with the collapse of
the Ottoman Empire and acquired the enthusiastic support of American
evangelicals who, even today, see the state of Israel as fulfilling
God’s providential plan. But the war also laid the groundwork for
the Holocaust in the establishment of the “stab in the back” myth
within Germany and the spread of “Protocols of the Elder of Zion”
by Russian emigres fleeing the Soviet Union.

Lastly, modern Islam is a byproduct of the collapse of the organized
caliphate. Separate from an organized state, Islam was refashioned
into a force of colonial resistance and political mobilization. This
new-fashioned Islam would help create the state of Saudi Arabia and
whose legacies extend today to the caliphates proclaimed by ISIL and
Boko Haran.

Jenkins draws on a poem by J.C. Squire which underscored the
difficulties religions faced during WWI:

God heard the embattled nations sing and shout,

“Gott strafe England!” and “God save the King!”

God this, God that, and God the other thing.

“Good God!” said God, “I’ve got my work cut out!”

God’s role aside, Philip Jenkins firmly establishes that WWI did not
just reshape the political landscape, but it created the religious
world we exist in today.

Dr. Robert H. Clemm is an assistant professor
of history at Grove City College. – See more at:

http://www.visionandvalues.org/2014/11/the-great-and-holy-war-how-world-war-i-became-a-religious-crusade-and-reshaped-the-religious-landscape/#sthash.zCmf9VuN.dpuf
http://www.wilsoncountynews.com/article.php?id=62273&n=commentaries-great-holy-war-how-world-war-became-religious-crusade-reshaped-religious-land

Armenia’s Opposition Forces Have No Potential For Early Elections –

ARMENIA’S OPPOSITION FORCES HAVE NO POTENTIAL FOR EARLY ELECTIONS – EXPERT

14:02 * 05.11.14

No domestic political developments are taking place in Armenia,
political scientist Alexander Iskandaryan told reporters on Wednesday.

With respect to the opposition forces’ demand for early elections,
he said that early elections need to be forced, but the opposition
forces have not the necessary potential.

“I do not see any preconditions for early elections. Yes, the
opposition forces are speaking of that, and it is our tradition. When
a political force emerges in Armenia, which will be able to make
five hundred thousand people take to the streets, we can speak of
that. But I do not see it now. Neither three nor four opposition
forces pose any threat to the authorities,” Mr Iskandaryan said. It
is not the need for early elections that is in question. Rather,
it is the potential for forcing such elections to be held, he added.

Leader of the Armenian National Congress (ANC) party Levon
Ter-Petrosyan did not participate in the latest presidential election
in Armenia, and the reason for that is clear. Chairman of the
Prosperous Armenia party Gagik Tsarukyan did not participate either,
but Heritage party leader Raffi Hovannisian got five times as few
votes as during the presidential election.

As regards constitutional reforms, Mr Iskandaryan said that Armenia’s
authorities and opposition forces are not going to reach a consensus.

“If the opposition forces agree with the authorities, one could hardly
understand it,” he said. The opposition forces object to constitutional
reforms only because they have been proposed by Armenia’s authorities.

“If the authorities state their objections to constitutional reforms,
the opposition forces will state reforms must be implemented,” Mr
Iskandaryan said.

If Armenia’s authorities wish to implement constitutional reforms,
they should not take notice of the opposition forces, he added.

Armenian News – Tert.am

BAKU: Paris’s Statement On Starting Work On Great Peace Deal Is Prog

PARIS’S STATEMENT ON STARTING WORK ON GREAT PEACE DEAL IS PROGRESS

AzerNews, Azerbaijan
Nov 4 2014

4 November 2014, 11:35 (GMT+04:00)
By Sara Rajabova

Azerbaijani foreign policy head said though no tangible results
were achieved during the recent meeting of Azerbaijani and Armenian
presidents in Paris, French President Francois Hollande’s statement
saying it is time to start working over a great peace agreement is
a progress.

Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov made the remark at a briefing on
November 3 speaking about the meeting between Azerbaijani President
Ilham Aliyev and Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan.

The two presidents held a meeting on October 27 with the participation
of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmen to discuss the settlement process
of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. They held a face to face meeting,
which was followed by another joint meeting with the OSCE Minsk
Group co-chairs. Afterwards, a joint meeting attended by President
Hollande, President Aliyev, President Sargsyan and the OSCE Minsk
Group co-chairmen took place.

Mammadyarov also stressed that it is necessary to continue working
over the issues that have not yet been agreed yet.

He said that the OSCE Ministerial Council meeting will take place in
Basel (Switzerland) in early December. A meeting of foreign ministers
of the two sides of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is also expected
to be held with OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmen.

Mammadyarov underlined that an important condition for the talks is
the withdrawal of Armenian troops from the occupied territories. He
said the mediators have agreed on this issue.

Armenia occupied over 20 percent of Azerbaijan’s internationally
recognized territory, including Nagorno-Karabakh and seven adjacent
regions, after laying territorial claims against its South Caucasus
neighbor that caused a brutal war in the early 1990s. Long-standing
efforts by U.S., Russian and French mediators have been largely
fruitless so far.

As a result of the military aggression of Armenia, over 20,000
Azerbaijanis were killed, 4,866 are reported missing and almost
100,000 were injured, and 50,000 were disabled.

The UN Security Council has passed four resolutions on Armenian
withdrawal from the Azerbaijani territory, but they have not been
enforced to this day.

ANKARA: Different Dimensions Of Azerbaijan-Turkey Relations Discusse

DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS OF AZERBAIJAN-TURKEY RELATIONS DISCUSSED IN BAKU

Daily Sabah, Turkey
Nov 4 2014

Ali Unal

Baku — The event “Days of Turkey in Azerbaijan,” jointly organized by
the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs Center for Strategic Studies
(SAM) and the Azerbaijan Presidency Strategic Studies Center (AzerSAM)
commenced Monday in Baku.

On the first day of the event two simultaneous conferences were held at
the Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy (ADA) and Azerbaijan State University
of Economics with the participation of dignitaries, including a member
of Turkish Parliament’s Azerbaijan Friendship Group, Adnan Yılmaz;
deputy undersecretary of the Energy and Natural Resources Ministry,
Zafer Benli; SAM Chairman Professor Ali Resul Usul and AzerSAM Chairman
Farhad Memmedov as well as experts and academics.

Speaking on a panel titled Political Security Dimensions of
Azerbaijan-Turkey Relations, which was held at ADA, Usul praised
the bilateral relationships built on common historical identity and
developing strategic cooperation mechanisms on different dimensions.

Referring to the third president of Azerbaijan, Haydar Aliev,
who said, “I am representing Turkey in places where there is no
representative of Turkey and Turkey represents Azerbaijan if there is
no representative from Azerbaijan,” Usul emphasized the importance of
developing relations in different fields and stressed the significance
of taking steps in harmony especially on regional and international
issues. Usul also underlined that the two countries should work
together to develop new public policies against issues such as the
Armenian allegation of genocide and the Nagorno-Karabakh issue,
which concerns both countries closely.

The second panel titled Azerbaijan-Turkey Economic Relations and
Economic Future of the Region, held at Azerbaijan State University
of Economics. Speaking at the panel, University Rector Adalet Muradov
said that the economic future of Turkey and Azerbaijan will determine
the future of the region and stressed the importance of economic
integration of the two countries. Yılmaz said in his speech that
the Azerbaijan and Turkey’s economies naturally complement each other
and added that Azerbaijan is Turkey’s gateway to Central Asia while
Turkey is the West’s gateway to Azerbaijan.

http://www.dailysabah.com/politics/2014/11/04/different-dimensions-of-azerbaijanturkey-relations-discussed-in-baku

Armenian-Turkish Film Platform Will Feature Historical Truth, Says G

ARMENIAN-TURKISH FILM PLATFORM WILL FEATURE HISTORICAL TRUTH, SAYS GOLDEN APRICOT DIRECTOR

11:32 * 04.11.14

In an interview with Tert.am, the Golden Apricot International Film
Festival’s founding director, Harutyun Khachatryan, addressed the
agenda of the 2015 annual cultural event, focusing particularly on
the Armenia-Turkey film platform (which next year will address the
Armenian Genocide topic).

What films is the Armenia-Turkey platform going to feature ahead of
the Armenian Genocide centennial?

For several years now, we have been approving those screenplays, which
have been shot by Armenians, Turks and Kurds. Some of those films
are complete; others have yet to be produced. There will be five or
six movies by the Turkish side and about four movies by Armenia. And
they will be included in the Golden Apricot 2015 program.

And what about those films’ content?

The films feature mainly the memories of those Turks, Kurds and
Armenians, who are inclined to search for their own roots; [those
are] recollections of their parents and grandfathers who turned out
crypto-Armenians. There is also a screenplay on the Kurdish Genocide,
as well as chronologies shot by Armenians, which trace back to the
Armenians’ presence in Istanbul and other Turkish cities and towns.

All the films feature Armenophilic and pro-Armenian stories;
they reflect the historical truth. And the episodes, if any, are
pro-Armenian too.

How do Turkish directors treat the fact that the pro-Armenian element
is present in all the movies?

Their reaction was normal, because there were even a couple of debates
at the Istanbul International Film Festival where the screenplay had
to receive the jury’s approval. And the scenario, which was submitted
by Turks and had to receive funding, was a story of a grandson
remembering his grandfather who, for some reason, was not buried in
their village. That’s a documentary film, and the hero rakes up his
ancestors’ story to find out that he had an Armenian grandfather who
was not allowed to be buried in their village. And that story proves
the starting point that makes many remember that their grandfathers
too, have Armenian roots. This is one of the screenplays which is
very exciting and important for me, as it is based on facts, without
any inventions and any artificial parts added.

So has a Turkish director submitted such a screenplay?

Yes, stories of the kind were submitted also by directors from Beirut,
but we, unfortunately, do not have so much money to fund several films
simultaneously. But those best ones were funded and shot. Those are
episodes based on the [historical] truth.

And what programs are you planning in the festival’s frameworks in
the run-up to the Genocide centennial?

There will be one program, [a film] dedicated to the Genocide,
which has been shot by foreigners; we also have a program covering
the history of world genocides. So there will be several films about
world genocides to involve the world in the same program like Armenia
and the Armenian Genocide. All the directors who have produced a film
about the Armenian Genocide will be invited to the festival.

What other program do you think can be implemented to give a maximum
possible world resonance to the issue?

We have envisaged such a program; we must have the festival’s best
films screened in the world’s best capitals and conduct debates to be
able to spread those stories about the Genocide. Otherwise, screening
them in Armenia will be no use; that way, only we and our guests will
be the ones to watch [them]. Over 30 films are going to be presented,
and when the final program is approved, it will be clear what films
are going to be screened and in what countries.

The festival addresses the Genocide topic every year. What role do
you think Golden Apricot has played in the Genocide recognition issue?

As I have coordinated the programs a couple of times, [I can say that]
we have addressed not only the Genocide but also the Nagorno-Karabakh
issue and our problems with the Turks. We invite Turkish directors
and intellectuals [to present] their movies; [one of them was]
Fatih Akin who shot a movie about the Armenian Genocide. We do not
much care about the quality and the success it had; what matters is
that we managed to bring the great director to Armenia. We took him
to the Genocide Museum and the Genocide Memorial; that man was so
moved that he dedicated himself to the topic for several years. He
produced a film which he later presented at the Venice Festival. And
that was very important. His film is now being screened in different
corners across the globe, and it will be screened on the sidelines
of Golden Apricot too. In this way, they got to know both about the
Genocide and Armenia, and the Armenian art and the problems [in the
country]. And everyone seemed to have shared those stories in his or
her own art. A couple of people are now producing [films].

And what films normally have a success? Those featuring cruel episodes
or those presenting all that allegorically?

Talented films are the ones that succeed. Cruel episodes do not matter
that much; they have to be talented and professional films. If the
film is talented, it influences everything; if you screen a successful
movie with cruel episodes, it may have a negative impact.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2014/11/04/armenia-harutyun-khachatryan/

BAKU: Meeting Of Azerbaijani, Armenian FMs Expected To Be Held In Ba

MEETING OF AZERBAIJANI, ARMENIAN FMS EXPECTED TO BE HELD IN BASEL, ELMAR MAMMADYAROV SAYS

APA, Azerbaijan
Nov 3 2014

[ 03 November 2014 14:30 ]

“This conflict can not be resolved in one day”

Baku. Rufat Ahmadzada – APA. A meeting of the foreign ministers of
Azerbaijan and Armenia with the participation of the OSCE Minsk Group
co-chairs is expected to be held in early December, Azerbaijani FM
Elmar Mammadyarov said at a press conference Nov.3 following the
meeting with Hungarian Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade Peter
Szijjarto in Baku, APA reports.

The minister said extensive discussions were held in Paris.

“Meetings were held at various levels, including with French President
Hollande. This is a step and a process as well. Hollande said in
his statement that it is high time to continue working on a peace
agreement. As you know, there are the Madrid principles. However, some
issues haven’t been agreed on yet. This conflict can not be resolved
in one day. We need to continue discussions on those issues that
are not yet agreed on. New York meeting is a proposal. Most likely,
a meeting on the Karabakh conflict will be held as a part of OSCE
Ministerial Council meeting in Basel at the beginning of December. We
will hold discussions. There would be a need for the next meeting of
the presidents in the near future,” he said.

Mammadyarov said that Azerbaijan considers it necessary to finish
the work on the peace agreement.

“We want to establish relations between the two communities. However,
the most important step is a withdrawal of troops from Azerbaijan. The
withdrawal of troops will remove most impediments and open up
opportunities for peace,” he added.

Nagorno-Karabakh Remains A Concern For UK

NAGORNO-KARABAKH REMAINS A CONCERN FOR UK

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Nov 3 2014

3 November 2014 – 1:40pm

British Minister of State for Europe David Lidington said at a press
conference with Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian that the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict remained a threat to the stability of the
region and Europe, News Armenia reports.

He noted that London was paying special attention to the efforts of
the OSCE Minsk Group to find a solution to the conflict.

Wesley Hailed At Armenian Bar Association Dinner For Humility; Brazi

WESLEY HAILED AT ARMENIAN BAR ASSOCIATION DINNER FOR HUMILITY; BRAZILE, TABADDOR ALSO FETED

Metropolitan News-Enterprise
Nov 3 2014

Los Angeles Superior Court Presiding Judge David Wesley has been
described at a dinner meeting of the Armenian Bar Association as a
man possessed of “dominating humility.”

Wesley was honored by the association on Wednesday, along with Los
Angeles Superior Court Judge Kevin C. Brazile and Immigration Judge
Ashley Tabaddor, with the U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office
for Immigration Review. The occasion was the group’s third annual
“Judge’s Night.”

More than 200 persons were seated at tables in the banquet room of
a mid-eastern restaurant in Glendale, with the capacity of 180. They
heard the association’s immediate past chair, Encino criminal defense
attorney Garo B. Ghazarian, say of Wesley:

“What is decisive and impressive about his functioning on the court
is his general attitude toward law, the habits of mind he has formed,
the capacity for detachment, and his temperament, and training for
putting his passion behind his judgment instead of in front of it.

“The attitudes and qualities which I am groping to characterize here,
and describe Judge Wesley with, are ingredients in what compendiously
might be called dominating humility.

“That’s right. Dominating humility.”

Wesley Expresses Optimism

Wesley decried the deep budget cuts the court has incurred over
the past five years, yet expressed “great optimism” for the court’s
immediate future. He told the audience, which included about 50 judges:

“We know that access to justice is a fundamental expectation of all
Californians–people just take it for granted and expect that judges,
following the law, will punish the wrongdoers, resolve family disputes
in a fair and just manner, enforce contracts, protect children and
others who cannot protect themselves, and ensure people’s rights as
they do so.

“I knew when I ran for assistant presiding judge four years ago that
in the years ahead, these fundamental expectations of all the citizens
of Los Angeles would be a great challenge.

“The court’s budget is already being cut, and more cuts seem likely.

“But it’s a challenge that I embraced–that I embraced because I had
faith in the judges and staff of your Superior Court to weather any
storm and overcome any crisis.”

Wesley said that the Los Angeles Superior Court has had to “find a way
to operate with $187 million less in our budget” than five years ago.

While court revenues have dwindled, he pointed out, caseloads have
burgeoned.

In 2008, he noted, the court handled about 2.5 million cases, in 58
courthouses, with 6,000 employees; by the end of this year, it will
have handled about 3 million cases, in 38 courthouses, staffed by
4,250 employees.

“But in spite of the growing caseloads and the lack of funds,” the
presiding judge said, “one thing remains clear:

“The courts of Los Angeles will not and cannot ration justice by
restricting rights of our citizens. We are committed to preserving
the rule of law in all areas of litigation.”

The court is, he advised, “restructuring,” expanding online services
and otherwise utilizing technology to cut costs. This includes, he
mentioned, replacing all 6,000 phones, most of which are from the
1970s, at a savings of $2.5 million a year.

“I am sure that we will emerge from the trauma of the last five years
a more vibrant and energized court, with far better and more efficient
environment in which lawyers can use their skills,” Wesley declared.

He said that he ends his term as presiding judge “a little tired,
but filled with great optimism for the future of our court,” adding:

“I have great confidence in the extraordinary intellect and exceptional
leadership of my fantastic partner, Presiding Judge-Elect Carolyn
Kuhl.”

Wesley received a framed commendation from the group which terms him
“a pillar of California’s judicial system,” and lauds “his superlative
standard of integrity” and “warmth, compassion, and sincerity.”

Hovannisian’s Remarks

Earlier in the program, the Armenian Bar Association’s president,
Armen K. Hovannisian, a Sherman Oaks attorney who had previously
served as the group’s chief, remarked:

“We take our work very seriously at the Armenian American Bar
Association because we are among the very few who are given the gift
of life when so many members of our families were given the curse of
death during the Armenian genocide.”

(Mass slayings of Armenians occurred in the Ottoman (Turkish)
Empire, beginning in 1915. Between 1 to 1.5 million Armenians were
put to death.)

Notwithstanding a background of terror, Hovannisian said, “We are a
happy people,” adding:

“We are an optimistic people. And… some of you who have known us
for more than a few days know that we can be a rambunctious lot.

“I have to say that when we Armenians get together, we seem to be
animated, and proud, and opinionated–but as soon as we get into
the larger, non-Armenian community…we take on your grandmothers’
quiet humility, their hushed expressions….

“But exercising a chairman’s prerogative today, I will tell you that
at least for tonight, mixed company or not…we’ll be proud, we’ll
be opinionated, we’ll be animated, and we’ll be happy.”

Words From McDonnell

Long Beach Police Chief Jim McDonnell, a candidate in tomorrow’s
election for sheriff, also addressed the association and alluded
to the Armenian genocide. He made note that next April 24 will mark
the centennial of the onset of the program to eradicate the Armenian
populace, and said he will “work with all of you” in connection with
observances of that occasion.

Tabaddor, who was born in Iran and is involved in Iranian American
community activities, in August brought suit against the Department of
Justice and others contesting her banishment from any case involving
an Iranian national. She alleges in her complaint, filed in the U.S.

District Court for the Central District of California, that the action
“is facially discriminatory and sets Judge Tabaddor apart for adverse
and unequal treatment, simply because of her race, national origin
and/or religion.”

(It lists her race as “Near East Asian, Middle Eastern and Persian”
and declares she is “culturally Muslim.”)

Tabaddor also avers that it impinges on her “First Amendment rights,
in that it impermissibly chills her rights of free expression and
association with Iranian-American groups, apart from her employment
by the Federal Government.”

http://www.metnews.com/articles/2014/snippets110114.htm

Yeghoyan Discusses Gyumri IT Center in Talk at AMA

Yeghoyan Discusses Gyumri IT Center in Talk at AMA

By Contributor on October 31, 2014

WATERTOWN, Mass.–A gathering of approximately 60 business people and
technical developers gathered at the Armenian Museum of America (AMA)
in October to learn about services offered by the Gyumri Information
Technology Center (GITC) in Gyumri, Armenia. Amalya Yeghoyan, GITC’s
executive director, outlined both GITC’s training program and the
software and computer services offered to clients worldwide.

GITC director Amalya Yeghoyan at AMA

GITC offers a two-year program of hands-on IT training to qualified
applicants with an existing background in computer science,
electronics, mathematics, or related fields. Students select a focus
either on mobile applications or web development. GITC’s environment
replicates a work environment with daily seven-hour attendance and
strict adherence to professional behavior and dress codes. The second
year includes a co-op program where students work in industry to gain
real-world practical experience. More than 90 percent of GITC
graduates find work in Armenia in their field of study, and no
graduates have left Armenia. Students pay $500 tuition per year, which
is only a fraction of GITC’s real cost per student.

director Amalya Yeghoyan with ABN founder Jack Antounian and attendees

To support their efforts, GITC offers consulting and software
development services to clients, focusing on web development, mobile
applications using the IOS and Android operating systems, software
development, networking, and other services. Currently GITC is serving
clients in Armenia, Russia, Germany, and the U.S. Communication with
GITC may be in English, Russian, or Armenian via e-mail, Skype, or
telephone. Yeghoyan indicated that the per-engineer costs in Armenia
are significantly lower than alternative offshore development centers,
and that GITC is committed to high-quality standards and satisfied
clients.

Yeghoyan’s brief PowerPoint presentation was followed by an
eight-minute video showing GITC’s facilities with testimonies by
students. A question and answer session followed. The presentation was
in English.

GITC was established in 2005 by the Fund for Armenian Relief (FAR),
the Enterprise Incubator Foundation, Shirak Technologies Ltd., and
donors from Armenia and the Armenian Diaspora to provide an IT
infrastructure in Gyumri and attract businesses. It has now embarked
on an effort to establish a revenue stream to sustain its education
programs.

Additionally GITC, in partnership with the Armenian Educational
Foundation, has reached out to schools in Artsakh (Karabagh) and
Armenia’s border regions with educational programs.

Yeghoyan’s visit to the U.S. was sponsored by FAR. Her presentation in
Watertown was sponsored by AMA, the Armenian Business Network (ABN),
and the National Association for Armenian Studies and Research
(NAASR). AMA’s director, Berj Chekijian, ABN’s founder, Jack
Antounian, and Yeghoyan’s host, Joseph Dagdigian, offered brief
introductory remarks. AMA, Eastern Lahmajun, and Massis Bakery
supplied some of the refreshments.

For more information on GITC, visit

http://armenianweekly.com/2014/10/31/yeghoyan-discusses-gyumri-center-talk-ama/
http://gitc.am/gitc.

ISTANBUL: ‘Hollande spring’ not bearing fruit

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Nov 2 2014

`Hollande spring’ not bearing fruit

November 02, 2014, Sunday/ 17:38:00/ EMRE DEMİR / ANKARA

President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄ?an’s much-anticipated visit to Paris on
Friday failed to produce any tangible results as President François
Hollande did not move to open any of the four European Union
negotiation chapters currently blocked by France.

President Hollande’s rise to power brought about a promise of a
`spring period’ in relations between the two countries, after
relations hit rock bottom during the tenure of the previous president,
Nicolas Sarkozy. However, after Hollande’s Ankara visit in January and
ErdoÄ?an’s recent visit to Paris there has not been any real progress.
France continues to block four of Turkey’s remaining EU negotiation
chapters. Turkey, on the other hand, continues to allow France a share
of its energy and defense contracts.

Turkish diplomats in Paris continue to reiterate that relations `have
never been better.’ As for the French, they indicate that they `aren’t
ready to accept the [Bashar al-] Assad regime as a secondary problem’
and that France fosters a partnership with Turkey regarding the Middle
East. Events in Syria and other bilateral developments have brought
Turkey and France closer together. The most obvious result in the
convergence between the two countries regarding the war in Syria would
be that France is the only Western ally to adopt the `buffer zone’
option.

But despite the importance attached to the meeting on the part of the
Turkish side, the visit to France has failed to yield any meaningful
result. Before the meeting, Paris was hopeful for a statement
indicating Turkey’s missile defense system contract would go to French
firms, while Turkey was hopeful for France unblocking four EU
negotiation chapters. Hence, after unsuccessful negotiations,
President ErdoÄ?an’s statement to Hollande at the press conference
stood out, saying: `We are waiting for a gesture from you regarding
this issue. We want to return to Turkey with good news.’ President
ErdoÄ?an’s tactic, normally used to draw promises out of building
contractors at grand openings for future projects, was not enough to
entice the French president.

President Hollande refrained from talking about the four chapters
blocked by France while mentioning Chapter 23 regarding the judiciary
and fundamental rights and Chapter 24 regarding justice, freedom and
security, which is blocked by Cyprus.

Hollande therefore both gave the message that the chapters blocked
during his predecessor Sarkozy would not be opened, while indirectly
criticizing Turkey’s decline in judicial independence and fundamental
rights.

Hollande looks for investment in Turkey

Hollande’s policy of close ties with Turkey is part of the economic
diplomacy doctrine to advance the investments of French firms. Instead
of an EU candidate country such as Turkey, Hollande prefers to regard
countries such as Qatar, China and Russia as economic partners. After
the Sinop nuclear power plant contract, French firms are interested in
energy contracts such as the TANAP gas pipeline. A $4 billion missile
contact previously given to China is now being negotiated to be given
to France.

The second reason France is warming up relations with Turkey is its
desire to be more effective in the Middle Eastern equation. By
engaging in seemingly riskless strategies such as the buffer zone
proposed by ErdoÄ?an, the French leader wants to obtain a new card
through his influence over Turkey.

The alliance with the French, especially during a period when ties
with America and Germany are tense, is very important for ErdoÄ?an.
Hollande, however, is keeping relations with Turkey behind the curtain
due to fears of criticism from the French public.

Next year is the centenary of the alleged Armenian genocide in 1915.
President Hollande promised to pass laws punishing those who deny the
genocide. How these concepts will affect Turkish-French relations
remains to be seen.

http://www.todayszaman.com/_hollande-spring-not-bearing-fruit_363329.html