BAKU: Divergence Of Opinions Rising Between Armenian Diaspora And Of

DIVERGENCE OF OPINIONS RISING BETWEEN ARMENIAN DIASPORA AND OFFICIAL YEREVAN

APA
Feb 4 2010
Azerbaijan

Baku – APA. Armenian Diaspora, who has been strongly supporting
Armenia since the declaration of its independence, seems to back off
after the protocols signed with Turkey.

Armenia has always had loyal support of the Armenian Diaspora,
one of the strongest diasporas in the world, since 1991, when the
Republic dropped out of Soviet Union. Moral and financial support
by the Diaspora is of great importance for Armenia, shaken by war,
earthquakes, trade embargos and political clashes.

According to APA, Armenian author Ruzan Akopyan, in his article for
"Business Week" magazine mentions that relations between Armenians
living in Armenia and Diaspora Armenians have taken a turn for the
worse. As he points out, the main reason causing relations to worsen
is shifting of priorities by both sides.

Although Armenian Diaspora gives a great importance to the recognition
of Armenian genocide of 1915, it’s not deeply involved in the domestic
issues of Armenia. Country’s intellectuals call the Armenian Diaspora
groups to criticize Yerevan to step up its efforts in achieving
progress of democracy, human rights in the Republic.

Analysts say the main reason why the Armenian Diaspora doesn’t
criticize official Yerevan is the close relations of leading US
Diaspora organizations with "Dashnaksutun Party" who was leading the
government in Armenia.

Expert on diaspora issues, Richard Kirakosyan said it would be
cooperation with enemy if it criticized the official Yerevan. However,
the Armenian Diaspora had no way but to react when the rapprochement
of Armenia and Turkey was put on agenda last year.

Those who criticized the protocols protested against the establishment
of historic-research commission to be involved in issues related to
"1915" and the clauses of the protocol on recognition of current
borders by Turkey, calling it inadmissible. Besides the organized
rallies and hunger demonstrations, there were also people who demanded
Serj Sarkiyan’s resignation.

Armenian Diaspora declared that Armenia gave in due to the "diplomatic
and propagandist attack" by West and Russia.

Ara Khachaturyan, in his article for the Armenian newspaper "Asbarez",
notes that Armenia made this step wishing to be hailed by US, Turkey
and Russia.

Chairman of Armenian "Qnchak" party’s US wing, Hambik Sarafyan
also stressed that protocols signed between Armenia and Turkey
would disaffect relations with Armenian Diaspora and build a wall
of distrust.

Note that, Armenian Diaspora has launched its broad financial support
to Armenia. "All Armenian" fund collected 15,9 million dollars in a
campaign, held every year in California for Armenia. The amount of
money was twice as big in 2008.

Z. Postanjayn "Heritage" Is Not The Spy Of "ANC"

Z. POSTANJAYN "HERITAGE" IS NOT THE SPY OF "ANC"

Aysor
Feb 3 2010
Armenia

"I present the view points of our nation in the PACE", – announced
Zaruhi Postanjyan, the member of "Heritage" party and the member of
the PACE delegation member of Armenia during the press conference.

"I am in public service today in front of everybody. I have fulfilled
the demand of our nation. I think that those who have elected
"Heritage" party and the ANC members are the part of our nation too",
– she said.

According to our speaker a lot of people will have the wish to split
the "Heritage" party blaming those political forces, but they will
fail.

"If they say that the one is the spy of the "other" then we do not
take the ANC as a "special service"",- Z. Postanjyan said.

Kaligian Analyzes ARF And Ottoman Relations At NAASR

KALIGIAN ANALYZES ARF AND OTTOMAN RELATIONS AT NAASR

Armenian Weekly
February 1, 2010

Dr. Dikran Kaligian presented a lecture entitled "The Armenian
Revolutionary Federation Under Ottoman Rule, 1908-14," on Thursday,
January 21, at the National Association for Armenian Studies and
Research (NAASR) Center. The lecture was the first of the year
for NAASR.

Kaligian is a historian who has taught at Clark University, Regis
College, and other institutions, as well as the managing editor of
the Armenian Review and a former chairman of the Armenian National
Committee of America, Eastern U.S. He is the author of Armenian
Organization and Ideology Under Ottoman Rule, 1908-1914 (Transaction,
2009), which provides a comprehensive picture of relations between
the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF) and the Committee of
Union and Progress (CUP) both before and after the CUP reached power
in the constitutional revolution of 1908.

Kaligian explained that his reason for undertaking this particular
research was that there is a lot of research that has been done on the
Armenian Genocide "but the years immediately before are critical…The
party that will end up implementing the Armenian Genocide is the CUP,"
and yet the CUP had been allied with the Armenians and in particular
the ARF. "How do you go from two parties, both revolutionary parties,
both working to overthrow Sultan Abdul Hamid, to just a few years
later one committing genocide against the people of the other,"
Kaligian asked. "That’s the question I wanted to look at."

An "Armenian Uprising"?

He briefly described the Turkish state-aligned historiography,
which generally describes "how there was no genocide and why it was
justified," and places blame for violence against the Armenians,
including the 1909 Adana Massacres and the Armenian Genocide, as a
natural response to an Armenian uprising. The ARF is often portrayed
as leading this uprising and its long-term alliance with the CUP is
seen as entirely insincere.

In his book, Kaligian "traces ARF policies and initiatives to answer
the important question of whether or not the party and the Armenian
community in general largely remained loyal to the constitutional
regime and only resumed their appeals to Europe after the government’s
repeated failures to implement promised reforms." Making extensive
use of the ARF archives in Watertown, Kaligian was able to give a
detailed picture of the inner workings of the party and its internal
debates and discussions.

Backtracking to the turn of the 20th century, Kaligian explained,
the ARF and Verakazmial Hnchakian Party entered into a dialogue with
Turkish opposition groups and both parties took part in the First
Congress of Ottoman Opposition Forces in 1902 along with Turkish, Arab,
Greek, Kurdish, Albanian, Circassian, and Jewish representatives. At
the end of 1907, the Second Congress of Ottoman Opposition Forces
met in Paris. This congress resolved to overthrow the Sultan and
to restore the Ottoman constitution using radical means, including
refusal to pay taxes, propaganda, and armed resistance, if necessary.

When the Sultan was indeed overthrown in 1908 and the Ottoman
constitution reim-plemented, there was jubilation among all of the
opposition parties, including the ARF. The ARF published a program
which recognized the territorial integrity of the Ottoman Empire
and called for a federal, decentralized government that would allow
a high degree of local autonomy. Parliamentary elections held late
in the year brought a multi-ethnic governing body which included 11
Armenians into existence.

Adana Crisis

However, in the spring of 1909 a counterrevolution temporarily drove
the CUP from power and in April 1909 the Adana massacres took place,
claiming upwards of 20,000 Arme-nian lives in and near Adana.

Kaligian stated that this "created the first major test for ARF-CUP
relations," and the ARF was faced with a decision: to continue or to
break off their cooperation with the CUP.

The party, Kaligian explained, had to weigh the degree of CUP
culpability in the massacres against the benefits of continuing to
work with the CUP toward a true constitutional regime. The party was
"torn between solidarity with the progressive elements within the
CUP and their revulsion at the murderous acts of its chauvinistic
elements." While the ARF clearly wanted to assist the progressive
elements within the CUP, they were forced to gamble on whether Adana
was an aberration or a sign of things to come. This, Kaligian said,
with their credibility at stake, was "a serious political gamble by
the ARF." The decision made-to continue cooperation under certain
conditions-may have been determined partly by self-interest, insofar
as the ARF "may not have wanted to admit their policy of cooperation
was a failure."

Although there was heightened distrust after Adana, Kaligian stated,
apart from that major incident conditions did, indeed, improve for
Armenians under the constitution, with acts of violence substantially
decreased.

However, less headway was made on the other issue most critical to the
ARF, that of land reform. While the CUP never officially retreated
from its promises to restore lands confiscated from Armenians under
the Sultan and to improve conditions for the peasants, neither did they
take any action, ultimately convincing the ARF that their pledges had
not been made in good faith. The CUP’s failure to act proved to be a
"crippling blow" to relations with the ARF, said Kaligian.

Kaligian explained that in a joint CUP and ARF meeting in
Constantinople on April 1, 1911, in response to worsening security
conditions "the CUP agreed to take steps to control persecution by
having the government arm all villages, Armenian and Kurdish."

Impatience with Unfulfilled Promises

In the summer of 1911, the ARF held its 6th World Congress, with the
main item on the agenda being relations with the CUP. The congress
passed a resolution stating, among other things, that "despite a
series of hopeful initiatives … the CUP has gradually withdrawn from
constitutional and democratic principles" and "failed to take steps
to combat and cleanse itself of right-wing elements which, increasing
their numbers over time, have developed a preponderant influence."

Therefore, "if, after the party’s appeal, the CUP and the cabinets
drawn from it do not show through their deeds that the realization of
their repeated promises are imminent, the Western Bureau is authorized
to cease its relations with the CUP."

Kaligian noted that it was not simply a clear case of the CUP’s being
uninterested in carrying out promised reforms. The CUP, in fact, was
struggling to maintain control and was confronted with a series of
crises, culminating in the Balkan Wars of 1912-13. The year 1912 would
be critical for the two parties: disagreements over the parliamentary
elections that year, in which the CUP sought to limit the number of
potential Armenian elected representatives, combined with ongoing
frustration over unkept promises, led the ARF to break off relations.

In the wake of the Balkan Wars, the European powers sought to place
inspectors to oversee the Armenian provinces and institute the
promised reforms. Such a measure was bitterly opposed by the CUP and
the Ottoman leadership in general. For various reasons, the inspectors
did not arrive in Constantinople until May 1914-only months before
the outbreak of World War I and too late to have any impact.

With the outbreak of war, Kaligian explained, a final breach came
when the CUP offered the ARF a deal it could not accept: to organize
an uprising among the Armenian population in the Russian Empire
(roughly in today’s Republic of Armenia) in exchange for autonomy
after the war. The ARF refused, saying that Armenians in Russia would
do their duty as Russian subjects and the Armenians in the Ottoman
Empire would do their duty as citizens. Talaat Pasha and the CUP
leadership seemingly regarded this as a final act of be-trayal.

Kaligian ended his presentation with the outbreak of World War I.

Following his lecture there was a lengthy discussion period and he
signed copies of Armenian Organization and Ideology Under Ottoman
Rule, 1908-1914.

More information about the lecture is available by calling
617-489-1610, faxing 617-484-1759, e-mailing [email protected], or writing
to NAASR, 395 Concord Ave., Belmont, MA 02478.

Luggage Of The Armenian State

LUGGAGE OF THE ARMENIAN STATE
Hakob Badalyan

Lragir.am
02/02/10

Erdogan is dissatisfied with the OSCE Minsk group and complains
that the Minsk group forces no repression to Armenia. This perhaps
means that Turkey does not have any hope in connection with the
Karabakh issue, which in turn means that the Sochi meeting, the
Madrid presumable and the two weeks given to the sides to express
their opinions in this relation, do not stand for the upcoming end
of the Karabakh conflict at all.

When such an opinion about the settlement appears, from the point
that no one forces any concession to Armenia, maybe they propose but
do not force, assessments that in this way the society is tried to be
shown that everything is all right in the Karabakh issue settlement
preparing for mutual concessions are heard.

In reality, first, when Armenia is said not to be forced any
concessions, this does not mean that everything is all right for
the Armenian side in relation to the Karabakh issue and there are no
grounds to worry. Second, if much is all right, it is not the worth and
the result of the brilliant policy of the Armenian party. Merely, the
interests of the superpowers engaged in the settlement of the Karabakh
issue suppose for the preservation of the status quo, even if they
wish to change it, because the "commander" of that change will not
be only one of them. Since there is no unique commander, there is no
"emperor" mediator, the mediators prefer preserving the status quo.

But this does not mean that everything is all right for Armenia with
regards to the Karabakh issue. And it cannot be so. And not only in
the settlement of the Karabakh issue, but also in the Armenian and
Turkish process, in other processes of the foreign policy in which
Armenia is busy. The point is that the perception of state comes from
inside the country and goes out but not on the contrary. Consequently,
we have to see what goes out from Armenia.

Rigged elections, illegitimate president, illegitimate administrative
system, connection of the governmental institutions with criminal
authorities, judicial system fulfilling the orders of the executive
power, apolitical parliament, economy divided in "zones" and quotas,
lack of political and economic competition, limitation of civil
freedoms, atmosphere of impunity, repression towards any dissidence.

How can the affairs of such a country be all right in the foreign
policy if such phenomena are present inside the country? In this
case, if something seems all right outside, it is surely temporary
and strictly relative.

Perhaps, the way to put in order foreign affairs is inside the
country. The society does not become dull because of the opinion that
the foreign society does not force concessions to Armenia, but because
of the general affirmations that the government is to cede Karabakh.

The society has been waiting for years for this "is to". Since it
waited in case of the previous oppositions, it has been waiting for
one year and a half in case of the current one too. While the society
is to be explained that even if the government wants, it cannot cede
Karabakh because it is not the Mergelyan institute which can be just
given to someone or exchanged with gas. Karabakh is a geopolitical
strip where Armenia’s interest is one of many. The society is to be
explained that the point is about ceding Armenia’s interests which
happens through time. It is happening because of all the issues
that are present inside Armenia as a luggage and go out. And outside
Armenia’s luggage turns out not to be competitive means for the modern
world but garbage, moreover expired.

Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Won’t Be Resolved Any Time Soon: Haik Demo

NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT WON’T BE RESOLVED ANY TIME SOON: HAIK DEMOYAN

Tert.am
14:33 ~U 01.02.10

"If there are those who think that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict will
be resolved in the coming 1-2 years, they are wrong. This conflict
is a dead-end; that is, the parties won’t reach a compromise," said
Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute Director Haik Demoyan, while
speaking with journalists today.

According to the museum director, one of the paths toward settling
the conflict leads to war; however, in that case, Azerbaijan will
incur a penalty, as the side which instigated war.

"Any war in this region is going to be short-term; the super-powers
wouldn’t tolerate long-lasting military actions," said Demoyan.

Yerevan-Tbilisi air communication temporarily suspended

Yerevan-Tbilisi air communication temporarily suspended
31.01.2010 16:38 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Starting February 1, Yerevan-Tbilisi air
communication will be temporarily suspended.

According to Unified transport administration, suspension of air
communication carries seasonal nature and is explained by
unsatisfactory passenger inflow, Georgia Online reported.

Tbilisi-Yerevan-Moscow flights were provided by Armavia Armenian
airway company. The first flight Tbilisi-Yerevan-Moscow was carried
out on March 14, 2009.

Rethink: A multicural take on the three Rs

Victoria Times Colonist

Rethink: A multicural take on the three Rs

By Steve Carey, Times ColonistJanuary 31, 2010

The film being shot at the Victoria Immigrant and Refugee Centre looks
like a typical indie movie project. Outside, a black Lincoln Town Car
sports a camera rigged up to the driver’s side window. Inside the
office, cameras and lights surround actors on a makeshift coffee shop
set, while a director addresses them.

`You’re a barista. You’ve had a thousand cups of coffee. Talk fast,’
the director, Kirk Schwartz, says. `And get close. One thing you have
to remember about video is that it really spreads out space.’

The actors take direction, and filming resumes. What makes this different?

The film project is part of the Multicultural Environmental Education
Program, or MEEP, which helps new Canadians learn about sustainability
and the environment. This time around, eight groups of newcomers are
writing, shooting and editing short films for the Recycling Council of
B.C.’s Trailer Trashed film festival. To enter, films must try to
convince viewers to stop using disposable coffee cups.

The project is a joint venture between the immigrant and refugee
society and MediaNet, a local film and video production co-op.
MediaNet has donated lights, cameras and other equipment while Kirk
Schwartz, the technical director of MediaNet, has donated his time.

`The really important thing to me is that people learn to tell their
own stories and have their own voice,’ he says. `It’s really exciting.
What happens in situations like this is that some people who feel that
they’re disenfranchised or not included, when they get the ability to
express themselves and have their voice, it’s amazing how their
self-confidence goes up and how excited they get about it.’

MEEP has been around for almost two years. Its activities have each
involved from 10 to more than 30 participants. Past projects have
focused on making non-toxic cleaning products, bicycle maintenance,
backyard and container gardening, as well as field trips to places
such as Francis King Regional Park and Galiano Island. Participants
also recorded green-living tips for radio in Spanish, Punjabi and
Mandarin, to spread awareness of things newcomers can do to reduce
their environmental impact, keep their family healthy and save money.
The tips are broadcast on CFUV 101.9 FM, Village 900 AM, Fairchild
Radio and Sher-e-Punjab.

`We saw that there was a gap where the newcomer population wasn’t
engaged,’ says MEEP co-ordinator Gagan Leekha.

`Newcomers have a lot of barriers when they’re settling – language,
housing, trying to get their basic needs met. But we felt that
environmental education was an important topic, especially during
settlement, when people are getting used to new ways of doing things,’
Leekha says.

In many of its projects, MEEP works with other local groups, such as
the LifeCycles Project Society, the Compost Education Centre, and
compost- and recycling-collection business ReFUSE. After completing
each project, participants sign a pledge to set environmental goals
for their lives.

Three immigrants – Viet Tran, Hereity Hagdu and Carlos Gaete – started
the non-profit immigrant and refugee society in Victoria 21 years ago.
The society has grown from the three founding members into a huge
organization, packing the third floor at 637 Bay St., and serving more
than 3,000 clients a year. With more than 400 volunteers and 30 staff,
it offers programs and services such as skills and employment
transition help, a free computer lab, and programs to help young
immigrants plan for their futures. The centre also offers cultural
bridging and host programs.

Gaete, one of the founders, knows how important helping other
newcomers is. When he first came to Canada from Chile in 1976, he
lived in a hotel in Winnipeg, and thought he’d be stuck there forever.
He had no idea how to rent an apartment. Then he met another man from
Chile, who helped him get a place to live, the first step, he says, in
becoming a part of a community.

`We created this organization because we wanted to provide services to
immigrants and refugees from the immigrant perspective, because
immigrants understand what other immigrants are going through,’ says
Gaete, now the executive director of the immigrant and refugee
society. `That makes the newcomer feel at home when they come to our
organization.’

Among staff at the society, 18 languages are spoken, not to mention
countless dialects. The idea for the environmental education program
came about three years ago, when Gaete noted the importance of
environmental education for newcomers. Thinking that environmental
education was a good addition to the society’s existing services, he
applied for federal government funding.

`We receive in Canada, 250,000 newcomers every year. In 10 years,
that’s 2.5 million. That’s a lot of people,’ Gaete says. `That’s 2.5
million people who don’t receive any environmental education. Most of
the newcomers, the great majority, are focused on settling in this new
country, and that’s a big deal. So environment, if we don’t make it
part of the settlement in this new society, it’s not going to be a
priority.’

The federal government rejected the original proposal, but funding was
obtained from the Victoria Foundation. With that money the society
hired a project co-ordinator to work on the proposal, and eventually
funding was obtained from Environment Canada.

Back on the film set, Samantha Rubin and Marianna Galstyan finish a
quick planning meeting about their film. Rubin, 41, who immigrated to
Canada from the U.S. in 1993, first got involved with immigrant and
refugee through a friend who was taking English as a second language
classes. Galstyan, 32, arrived from Armenia three years ago.

`Our film is about a fortune teller who reads coffee grounds. She’s
reading the grounds of someone who uses a reusable ceramic mug … and
then she reads the grounds of a North American who comes in with a
disposable cup, and she can’t read him,’ Rubin says.

The aim is to highlight differences between the rushed lifestyle of
North Americans and the more relaxed pace in other countries. `And
we’re telling people, `Just slow down. Just sit, enjoy your coffee,
and stop trying to rush so much. And your life will be better,” Rubin
says.

Galstyan first got involved with the program when it partnered with
LifeCycle’s fruit-picking project.

`Before, I didn’t know much about the environment – the details, how
to recycle, this type of thing,’ she says. `By participating in
projects like this, you learn things. It’s changing my lifestyle, and
making me more educated in terms of making the right choices.

`Being an immigrant in Victoria is very hard. There are pre-determined
social groups here that are not too open to new things or new people.
Being part of [the immigrant and refugee society] was the first thing
for me to do. It was how I started creating friendships, and started
to fit in,’ she says. `I look at this from the point of view of
obtaining new skills. In Armenia, you have preset fields that you’re
encouraged to go into by your parents – finance, law, medicine – but
for a woman to do film or photography … it doesn’t bring you money, so
you’re not encouraged to do that. But here, you’re given so much
freedom to explore the artistic side of you.’

Rubin agrees that the program is a unique way to explore and
understand other cultures.

`When you have projects like this you get exposed to a lot of
different ways of being, ideas that people have, ways of navigating
through life. I think it’s a wonderful opportunity, because it can
shatter presuppositions about other cultures,’ Rubin says.

While the education program will end in March, the plan is to
integrate environmental education into every program the immigrant and
refugee society offers.

`We’re working on another project called `Green is For Everyone.’ It
is offering diversity training for local environmental groups. It
looks at how environmental groups can make their outreach,
communications and workplace even more inclusive and welcoming,’
Leekha says. `Environmental groups have the resources and skills to
engage a wider range of people.’

Read Steve Carey’s blog at timescolonist.com/rethink to find out how
to enter the Trailer Trashed film festival, and to hear an interview
with Gagan Leekha, MEEP Project Co-ordinator.
© Copyright (c) The Victoria Times Colonist

Armenian-Turkish Protocols not included in NA spring session agenda

Armenian-Turkish Protocols not included in NA spring session agenda
30.01.2010 17:41 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian-Turkish Protocols are not included in the
agenda of NA spring session, press secretary of RA NA speaker Nairi
Petrosyan told PanARMENIAN.Net . Armenian Turkish Protocols are in the
Office of the Armenian President’s Administration, they are not sent
to the Parliament yet., he said. After RA Constitutional Court verdict
Protocols will be sent to the parliament for ratification.

The Protocols aimed at normalization of bilateral ties and opening of
the border between Armenia and Turkey were signed in Zurich by
Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian and his Turkish
counterpart Ahmet Davutoglu on October 10, 2009, after a series of
diplomatic talks held through Swiss mediation.

Moscow To Grant Abkhazia $330 Mln Over 3 Years

MOSCOW TO GRANT ABKHAZIA $330 MLN OVER 3 YEARS

AZG DAILY
30-01-2010

International

Russia will provide Abkhazia financial assistance worth over 10 billion
rubles ($330 million) in the next three years, Russia’s ambassador
to the unrecognized republic said Thursday, according to Ria Novosty.

Semyon Grigoryev said this year Abkhazia would receive about 1.9
billion rubles ($62 million). He stressed that Russia sought to boost
Abkhazia’s economy not only with financial assistance but also with
Russian investment.

"Needless to say, gratuitous Russian aid will keep Abkhazia’s economic
and social sphere going but their development should receive a real
boost from serious Russian investment, primarily from large and
medium-size companies," he said.

The envoy said investment activity would be facilitated by a bilateral
cooperation agreement signed by the two countries in 2009.

Georgia and Russia fought a five-day war in August 2008 over South
Ossetia, which was attacked by Tbilisi in an attempt to bring it
back under central control. Moscow later recognized South Ossetia and
Abkhazia as independent states. Under mutual assistance treaties signed
in November 2008, Russia pledged to help both republics protect their
borders, and it has thousands of troops stationed in the republics,
the source reports.

Classical Comes To Central

CLASSICAL COMES TO CENTRAL
By Karen Cotton, [email protected]

Wyoming Tribune
Jan 29, 2010

Feel the soul soothing power of classical music as the award-winning
group Prima Trio performs this Sunday at Cheyenne’s Central High.

The concert is sponsored by the Cheyenne Concert Association.

The Prima Trio is the Grand Prize and Gold Medal Winners of the
Prestigious 2007 Fischoff Chamber Music Competition.

It’s comprised of pianist Anastasia Dedik, clarinetist Boris
Allakhverdyan, and violinist/viola player David Bogorad. Bogorad
hails from Denmark, Allakhverdyan is from Armenia and Dedik comes
from Russia.

"They met in Ohio at the Oberlin Conservatory," said Kathie Selden,
the president of the Cheyenne Concert Association. "They came from
all over the world and are touring all over the world."

The Prima Trio will perform pieces by Mozart, Schickele and others.

"They’ve all won numerous awards besides the one that they’ve won
as a trio," Selden said. "They’re truly professional musicians. They
are young themselves, but it’s good for young people in Cheyenne to
experience them in this small setting.

"It is an intimate setting when you’re at Central High School’s
auditorium to experience these really fine musicians."

This performance is a matinee.

"Many of our members have requested matinees over the years that I’ve
been involved in it," Selden said of the concert association.

The Cheyenne Concert Association works to bring professional musicians
and performers into local intimate settings with reasonable ticket
prices.

The next offering on the Cheyenne Concert Association’s season is
Home Free. That performance takes place on April 30.

"That concert will be fun because it’s Home Free, and it’s a male a
cappella group," Selden said.

Prima Trio

Cheyenne Concert Association concert features pianist Anastasia Dedik,
clarinetist Boris Allakhverdyan and violinist David Bogorad

When: Sunday, Jan. 31, 2 p.m.

Where: Central High Auditorium, 5500 Education Drive

Tickets: $20; $10 for students

More info: Up to two music students can attend concert for free with
a paying adult. Music students must sign in. 634-5588 or 634-8606

Prima Trio:

www.primatrio.com