Gandzasar Monastery Fenceing Being Coated At Very Rapid Paces

GANDZASAR MONASTERY FENCEING BEING COATED AT VERY RAPID PACES

PanARMENIAN.Net
July 16, 2011 – 11:03 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Gandzasar Monastery fencing is presently being
coated in a rush.

As Artsakh sources told PanARMENIAN.Net correspondent, despite all
demands and subsequent promises as of July 15 19:00pm, the coating
of the fence was not suspended, and even continues at very rapid paces.

On July 15, Maecenas Levon Hayrapetyan who initiated restoration
works at Gandzasar Monastery decided to suspend restoration.

As Artsakh resident Marut Vanyan told PanARMENIAN.Net correspondent,
the Maecenas refused to pay to workers who carried out restoration
works, and, also, decided not to pay for electricity of the Monastery,
Vanyan cited the monastery Priest as saying.

Moreover, he said that despite information spread by the Armenian media
outlets about allegedly discontinued construction works in Gandzasar
several days ago, in fact they were suspended just a day before.

In May 2011, Artsakh Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Church addressed
the department for protection and study of historic monuments at
NKR government for permission to restore the monastery fence, naming
Moscow-based Armenian businessman, oligarch Levon Hayrapetyan as the
project sponsor and initiator.

As the head of the department Slava Sargsyan reported earlier,
the department didn’t intend to give permission, concerned that the
monastery will lose its historic and cultural value. The fence will be
turned into a modern construction, thus losing a chance to be listed
among UNESCO-protected monuments.

Coating of 13 century fence surrounding Gandzasar Monastery in Nagorno
Karabakh aroused stir in Facebook and amid bloggers and art lovers.

According to Facebook poll, presently 2163 people opposed to coating
of monastery fence, with only 42 favoring the idea.

Armenian Association of Architects and Restorers fyrther joined
the call to suspend restoration works. Particularly, Chair of the
Association Gagik Soghomonyan said that restoration of Gandzasar
Monastery would cost Armenian Maecenas cheaper, and would be carried
out within law, if he addressed to the Armenian Association of
Architects and Restorers.

In turn, Deputy Chairman of the Association Stepan Nalbandian said
that it is not late to save Gandzasar yet. According to him, there
is information that the coating of the fence will be demolished and
the previous look will be recovered.

Coating of 13 century fence surrounding Gandzasar Monastery in Nagorno
Karabakh aroused stir in Facebook and amid bloggers and art lovers.

According to Facebook poll, presently 2163 people opposed to coating
of monastery fence, with only 42 favoring the idea.

6 11.07.11 – Fence surrounding Gandzasar Monastery is being coated

Restitution Des Biens Armeniens…

RESTITUTION DES BIENS ARMENIENS…
Jean Eckian

armenews.com
samedi 16 juillet 2011

Au cours d’une conference dediee aux droits des peuples autochtones,
particulièrement a ceux des Armeniens d’Armenie Occidentale, Armenag
Aprahamian, president du Conseil National Armenien, s’exprimant a
la Tribune du Palais des Nations de Genève (ONU), a rappele de la
necessite de commencer le processus de restitution de biens immobiliers
appartenant aux Armeniens d’Armenie occidentale, sous le contrôle
actuel de la Turquie, en conformite avec la Declaration des Nations
Unies sur les droits des peuples autochtones.

La procedure de ces restitutions couvrira des biens reels comprenant
” 2538 eglises, 451 monastères, 1996 ecoles, 29 ecoles secondaires
et 42 orphelinats “, a enumere A. Aprahamian, en conformite avec
l’article 11 de la Declaration stipulant que les Etats se doivent
d’accorder reparation par le biais de mecanismes efficaces pouvant
comprendre la ” restitution determinee en collaboration avec les
peuples autochtones a l’egard de leurs biens culturels, intellectuels,
religieux et spirituels pris sans leur libre consentement prealable
et eclaire, ou en violation de leurs lois, traditions et coutumes. ”

Armenians Find Their Roots At Laval Armenian Festival

ARMENIANS FIND THEIR ROOTS AT LAVAL ARMENIAN FESTIVAL

Laval News

July 15 2011
QC, Canada

By Martin C. Barry | Fri, 07/15/2011 – 17:30 . From the left, Reverend
Hrayr Nikolian of Sourp Kevork Apostolic Church, Georges B. Tsovikian
of the Armenian National Committee of Laval, Laval city councillor for
Ste-Dorothee Pierre Cleroux and wife, and Hagop Lakhoyan, president
of the Sourp Kevork Apostolic Church’s council.

A change of setting and great weather combined to make the 2011
Laval Armenian Festival one of the most enjoyable in years. Held in
the past on a vacant lot on St-Martin Blvd. provided by a shopping
centre development corporation, the three-day festival was held this
year on the grounds of the Sourp Kevork Armenian Apostolic Church on
des Prairies Blvd. in Laval-des-Rapides.

Laval loves Armenians

“It’s a pleasure for me to be here,” said Laval city councillor for
Ste-Dorothee Pierre Cleroux, who attended on the second evening as a
representative for Mayor Gilles Vaillancourt. Since Cleroux’s district
has a significant proportion of persons of Armenian heritage, it was
appropriate for him to be a special guest at the festival.

“This is a beautiful event to be at and I am very fond of these
people,” said Cleroux said, adding that the mayor has a special place
in his heart for the Armenian people. In recent years, Vaillancourt
has donated land to local Armenians to build a new church. He also
helped create a memorial to the Armenian Genocide, which is located
just off a service road on Autoroute 440 in Laval’s downtown sector.

“If there is more we can do them we will do more,” said Cleroux.

Finding their roots

Held for three days during the recent Canada Day long weekend,
the Armenian Festival attracted thousands of local Armenians, who
enjoyed traditional food, midway games, dancing and live music, to
remind them of their Armenian roots and culture. As many as 9,000
Laval residents are of Armenian descent. Organized as a fundraiser
by members of the Armenian Apostolic Church, it is the largest such
festival that local Armenians stage.

“This provides Armenians with a taste of Armenian music, food and
culture,” said Sona Lakhoyan, a festival spokesperson. “They don’t
necessarily have this during the rest of the year. This gives them a
chance, at the same time as Canada Day, to celebrate our culture. But,
of course, it’s also open to everyone. People of all nationalities are
invited to come here to taste and feel what it means to be Armenian.”

11 p.m. shutdown

As a gesture of welcome to residents of the neighbourhood surrounding
Sourp Kevork Armenian Apostolic Church, the festival’s organizers
extended a special invitation to come and see the festival. As a
courtesy, the Armenian Festival organizers stopped all activities each
night before 11 p.m. so as not to overly disturb the neighbourhood’s
usual tranquility.

While the organizers had in the past benefitted from the generosity
of the Smart!Centres corporation which allowed them to use the former
Centre 2000 site on St-Martin Blvd. for the festival, the company is
now in the midst of redeveloping the site, reportedly for a super-sized
Wal-Mart store. “They were real good to us and we can never forget
that,” said Lakhoyan, acknowledging the kindness of Smart!Centres. “We
really appreciate the help they have provided to our communuity.”

http://lavalnews.ca/article/Laval-Armenian-Festival-191404

Armenian Organizations In US Uncertain On US Ambassador To Armenia N

ARMENIAN ORGANIZATIONS IN US UNCERTAIN ON US AMBASSADOR TO ARMENIA NOMINEE

news.am
July 15 2011
Armenia

YEREVAN. – American office of Hay Dat and other Armenian organizations
will clarify their position on nominee of US Ambassador to Armenia
John Heffern after written questions and answers, head of the Hay
Dat office and ARF Dashnaktsutyun on political issues Giro Manoyan
told at a press conference.

Regarding oral answers of the nominee in Senate, particularly on
Armenian-Turkish relations and his disposition on Armenian Genocide,
Manoyan told that Heffern stated Washington’s official viewpoint. He
added nothing unlike previous nominee Richard Hoagland, who tried to
comment on disposition of Secretariat of the State on Genocide issue.

“Hoagland has stated that Washington cannot recognize the Genocide
unless it is proven that the massacre was deliberate. Thus he put
into question the deliberateness of the Genocide,” Manoyan stressed
and added that Heffern’s answers on this issue were moderate.

Yelena Bonner Obituary

YELENA BONNER OBITUARY
Isobel Montgomery

guardian.co.uk
Sunday 19 June 2011 16.57 BST

Valiant human rights activist and widow of Soviet dissident Andrei
Sakharov

Yelena Bonner addressing the European parliament during the
award ceremony of the Sakharov Prize in 2008. Photograph: Vincent
Kessler/Reuters Now that the battles fought by the dissident movement
and by the thousands of individuals who voiced their opposition to the
Soviet state have been swallowed up by the larger events of history,
only a few names will be recalled. Yelena Bonner’s will be one of
them. She and her husband, Andrei Sakharov, symbolised – within the
Soviet Union and throughout the west – the strength and courage of
those opposed to state socialism. Bonner, who has died aged 88, was
often portrayed merely as the wife of the Soviet Union’s most famous
dissident scientist, but her history as an activist was as lengthy
as her husband’s. Her determination, organisational skills and often
fiery temper consistently drew attention to human rights issues.

Sakharov and Bonner were a team, bound together by the conviction that
freedom of conscience was a prerequisite of any civilised state and
that east and west should move towards reconciliation. This conviction
helped them survive the ordeals of surveillance, harassment, arrest
and internal exile.

The two first met in the autumn of 1970 outside a courtroom in Kaluga,
central Russia, where a scientist, Revolt Pimenov, and a puppet-theatre
actor, Boris Vail, were on trial for distributing the samizdat human
rights journal Chronicle of Current Events. Sakharov had already
achieved worldwide attention for publishing his essay Reflections
on Progress, Peaceful Coexistence and Intellectual Freedom, in the
New York Times in 1968, but Bonner was the practical and already
experienced organiser of the group – it was she who found rooms for
both the defendants and the observers of the trial.

Like Sakharov, Bonner came from the Soviet elite. Unlike the brilliant
physicist, who was recruited straight from university to the team that
developed the Soviet Union’s first hydrogen bomb and then became the
youngest member of the Soviet Academy of Sciences, Bonner had seen
the brutality behind Stalin’s Soviet Union early on.

She was born in Merv (now Mary), a town in Turkmenistan, the eldest
child of Bolshevik revolutionaries, who named her Lusia. Her father,
Georgy Alikhanov, was first secretary of the Armenian central committee
and her mother, Ruth Bonner, was a committed party activist.

Yelena’s earliest years were spent in Chita in the Soviet far east,
where her father had been sent after a political falling out with
Grigory Zinoviev, a leading member of the politburo. The family then
moved to Leningrad, where they lived among the city’s Bolshevik elite.

At one stage, they had a flat in a house where Sergei Kirov, secretary
of the Leningrad party, also lived. In her second book of memoirs,
Mothers and Daughters (1991), Bonner recalled being taken out by
Kirov in his car and standing on the dais with him at an official
demonstration. It was the murder of Kirov in 1934 that signalled
the beginning of the Terror and Stalin’s purge of the old Bolshevik
cadres. By 1937 the family were living in Moscow, where, some time
before the winter of 1938, during the first wave of the Terror,
Bonner’s father was arrested and shot.

Her mother was arrested as the wife of an enemy of the people and
sentenced to 10 years in a labour camp. Bonner herself was taken
to the “big house”, the secret police headquarters in Leningrad,
for questioning. She remained in Leningrad to be brought up by her
grandmother. When she was eligible for her internal passport she
discovered that her parents had failed to register her birth. Free
to chose her own name, she picked her mother’s surname and Yelena
after the heroine of Turgenev’s novel On the Eve.

When the Soviet Union was invaded in June 1941, Bonner volunteered for
the Red Army’s hospital trains, becoming head nurse. The after-effects
of a shell attack that October, which left her temporarily blinded,
led to her being invalided out of the medical corps in early 1945. She
returned to Leningrad and in 1947 was accepted as a student at
the city’s medical institute. After graduating, she specialised in
paediatrics. She met her first husband, Ivan Semyonov, at medical
school and they had two children, Tanya and Alexei. In the 1950s
Bonner spent six months working in Iraq for the Soviet ministry of
health and contributed articles to medical newspapers, as well as to
literary journals.

In 1965, after her first marriage had fallen apart, Bonner moved into
her mother’s flat in Moscow. Her upbringing had seemed conventional
enough: childhood membership of the Komsomol, followed by an
application for full party membership after her parents had been
rehabilitated in 1954. However, the fate of her family and friends
and her Jewish/Armenian parentage – which made her politically
suspect to the authorities – encouraged Bonner in her scepticism of
the officially presented party line. The crushing of the 1968 Prague
uprising marked for her, as for many dissidents of her generation,
the beginning of her questioning of the basis of the Soviet state.

Gradually, she moved into dissident circles, although it was not
until 1972 that she renounced her party membership.

Bonner and her mother introduced Sakharov to the wider dissident
movement. As he wrote in his memoirs, it was she who “taught me to
pay more attention to the defence of individual victims of injustice”.

Their flat became a clearing house for those involved in the Helsinki
Group, the human rights group set up to monitor Soviet violations
of the Helsinki Accords, and for groups fighting for the rights
of Christians, ethnic minorities and of Soviet Jews who wanted to
emigrate to Israel.

When Sakharov’s children complained to him about his increasingly vocal
opposition to the Soviet state, as well as about his friendship with
Bonner so soon after his first wife’s death from cancer, he moved
into the Bonners’ flat. He and Bonner married in 1972.

With Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s expulsion from the Soviet Union in 1974,
they became the central focus of the dissident movement. Sakharov went
on his first hunger strike in 1974, during Richard Nixon’s visit to
Moscow, to publicise the plight of political prisoners.

That winter, Bonner’s eyesight – already damaged by her wartime
injury, thyroid problems and glaucoma – deteriorated sharply and she
was warned that, without an operation available only in the west,
she would go blind. While she was in Italy in 1975 recovering from
the eye operation, Bonner heard of Sakharov being awarded a Nobel
peace prize, and she remained in the west to attend the prizegiving
ceremony and to deliver her husband’s Nobel lecture that December.

The KGB had now resorted to sending the couple obscene pictures and
photographs of dismembered corpses through the post, and accusing
Bonner in particular of being a “money-grubbing Jew” who had married
Sakharov for his privileged position. Despite such harassment, the
couple continued to highlight the plight of political and religious
dissenters in Leonid Brezhnev’s stagnant Soviet state. Sakharov’s
position as a state scientist and Bonner’s status as an Invalid Veteran
of the Great Patriotic War prevented the KGB from attacking them too
openly. But their friends and fellow human-rights activists were picked
off the streets, given summary trials and exiled or imprisoned. The
Sakharovs, both in poor health, remained at liberty to speak, write
and give interviews to foreign correspondents. However, at the start
of 1980, after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Sakharov’s open call
for an international boycott of the Moscow Olympics led to his arrest.

Sakharov was stripped of his awards and exiled to Gorky (now Nizhny
Novgorod) by decree. Bonner remained free to travel between Moscow
and Gorky, give interviews and publicise her husband’s plight. She
was Sakharov’s lifeline to the outside world. She was, as Sakharov
put it, “always a doer” and refused to stop her activities because
of her husband’s arrest. But the strain immediately began to affect
Bonner’s health. Stripsearched on a train on her way back from Gorky
in the winter of 1982 and left to find her way back to Moscow alone,
she suffered her first heart attack the following spring and another
more severe one a year later.

Then, in 1984, she too was arrested, charged with slandering the Soviet
state, sentenced and exiled to Gorky. Bonner’s health deteriorated
further and Sakharov went on hunger strike on three occasions to demand
that she be allowed to travel to the west for treatment. Finally,
in 1986, she was allowed to travel abroad for heart surgery. She took
with her a volume of memoirs of their internal exile, which appeared
as Alone Together in the same year.

The release of Bonner and Sakharov from their exile came suddenly and
unexpectedly. One day an engineer turned up at the flat in Gorky to
install a telephone. The following morning they received their first
telephone call. It was from Mikhail Gorbachev, telling them they were
free to return to Moscow. Their release was one of the most tangible
signs that glasnost had begun.

Although some of Gorbachev’s policies seemed close to fufilling
demands made by the dissidents of the 1970s, the Sakharovs continued
to dissent from the official party line. They were instrumental in
forming the unofficial organisation Memorial, set up to campaign
for the rehabilitation of political prisoners. In 1989 Sakharov
was elected to the Congress of People’s Deputies and during its
first session criticised Gorbachev for refusing to relinquish the
Communist party’s monopoly on power. On 14 December that year, after
a particularly tense session of the congress, during which Gorbachev
had demanded Sakharov sit down, he returned home and told his wife
that he had work to prepare for the next day’s session. In the morning
she found him dead from a heart attack.

Bonner, grief-stricken, had to face Yevgeny Primakov, one of
Gorbachev’s aides, who wanted to give the former dissident a state
funeral. She also had to endure the row that had erupted when the
congress did not honour Sakharov with a day’s recess. In distress,
Bonner shouted to waiting reporters from the flat where her husband’s
corpse still lay: “You all worked hard to see that Andrei died sooner,
by calling us from morning to night, and never leaving us to our life
and work. Be human beings. Leave us alone.”

When Gorbachev appeared at the funeral and asked her if there was
anything he could do, she requested that Memorial should be registered
as an official organisation. Many reformist politicians rushed to her
side. Boris Yeltsin was not slow to show his support of her ideas,
but Bonner distrusted politicians wanting to use Sakharov’s memory
for their own ends. In early 1991, when Gorbachev, also a Nobel peace
prize winner, crushed a pro-independence demonstration in Vilnius,
the capital of Lithuania, with force, she requested that Sakharov’s
name be removed from the list of laureates. Later the same year she
spoke to the crowd outside the White House, the Russian parliament
building, in support of Yeltsin during the abortive coup.

As the Soviet Union fell apart, Bonner continued working to support
human rights and democracy. By 1996, she was calling for democrats
not to vote for Yeltsin in the presidential elections; the war in
Chechnya had dashed her hopes for him as a democratic leader. She
became an outspoken critic of Yeltsin’s successor Vladimir Putin,
and last year was among the prominent signatories of a petition
calling for his resignation.

Bonner divided her time latterly between Russia and Boston,
Massachusetts, where her son and daughter, who survive her, had lived
since the 1970s, and where she died.

~U Yelena Georgievna Bonner, human rights activist, born 15 February
1923; died 18 June 2011

Senator Menendez Describes Us Administration Position On Armenian Ge

SENATOR MENENDEZ DESCRIBES US ADMINISTRATION POSITION ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE AS “UNTENABLE”

AZG DAILY
15-07-2011

Armenian Assembly of America reserves judgment until it reads nominee’s
responses to written questions

Washington, DC – Mr. John Heffern, the Administration’s nominee to
serve as Ambassador of the United States of America to the Republic of
Armenia faced a series of questions on a range of issues during today’s
Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing chaired by Senator Jeanne
Shaheen (D-NH), reported the Armenian Assembly of America (Assembly).

Presiding over the hearing, Foreign Relations Subcommittee Chair
on European Affairs, Senator Shaheen began the round of questioning
and touched on the Protocols between Armenia and Turkey, the current
status of the Nagorno Karabakh talks and prospects for peace, as well
as the importance of democracy and free and fair elections, especially
in the context of the upcoming national elections in Armenia in 2012
and 2013. Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) emphasized the importance of
democratization and queried Mr. Heffern about the steps he would take
to assist Armenia’s development.

In response to Senator Shaheen’s questions, Mr. Heffern indicated
that the United States strongly supported the Protocols signed
between Armenia and Turkey in October of 2009, and indicated that
the Administration remains “committed to doing whatever we can to
encourage the two parties to get the protocols back on track.” Mr.

Heffern also stated that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “has
made it clear” that “the ball is in Turkey’s court.” With respect to
the Nagorno Karabakh peace process, Mr. Heffern noted that President
Barack Obama and Secretary Clinton have been “deeply involved” and
“remain committed” to the OSCE Minsk Group process to find “a lasting,
peaceful and just solution to this conflict.”

On the democracy front, Mr. Heffern noted a series of positive
steps that the Armenian government has taken in the last six months
and indicated that if confirmed he would continue to build on this
progress and the work of former Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch.

The Armenian Assembly has consistently supported the presence of
a U.S. Ambassador in Armenia to build on the positive and growing
bilateral relationship. In Mr. Heffern’s opening testimony, he
indicated that “the Obama Administration has strengthened U.S.

relations with Armenia” and noted that last April the Presidents “of
our two countries held their first bilateral meeting in 10 years and,
when Secretary Clinton visited Yerevan last year, it was the first
visit by a Secretary of State to Armenia in 19 years.”

Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) welcomed Mr. Heffern’s opening statement
which reiterated President Obama’s position on the Armenian Genocide:
“President Obama has recognized and deplored the horrific events that
took place in the waning days of the Ottoman Empire. He has publicly
called the massacre of 1.5 million Armenians at this time one of the
worst atrocities of the 20th century. The President has urged Turkey
and Armenia to work through their painful history to achieve a full,
frank, and just acknowledgement of the facts. If confirmed, I will
do my best to fulfill the President’s vision.”

Senator Menendez outlined the facts and discussed several historical
documents pertaining to the Armenian Genocide, including various cables
from U.S. officials serving at the time of the Genocide as well as
Article II of the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and
Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Menendez asked Mr. Heffern if
he disputed any of the facts presented, of which Mr. Heffern did not.

Senator Menendez also asked if Mr. Heffern believed that the facts
presented, including those in Mr. Heffern’s opening statement fit the
definition of Article II of the Genocide Convention. Heffern responded
in the affirmative, but indicated that the characterization of the
events was a policy decision as reflected in the President’s April
24th statement.

In closing, Senator Menendez expressed his continued frustration with
Administration policy by stating that this is “an inartful dance that
we do. We have a State Department whose history full of dispatches
cites the atrocities committed during this period of time. We have
a Convention from which we signed on to as a signatory that clearly
defines these acts as genocide. We have a historical knowledge of
the facts which we accept that would amount to genocide, but we are
unwilling to reference it as genocide. And if we cannot accept the
past we cannot move forward, and so I find it very difficult to be
sending diplomats of the United States to a country in which they will
go, and I hope you will go, as some of your predecessors have, to a
Genocide commemoration and yet never be able to use the word genocide.

It is much more than a question of a word. It is everything that
signifies our commitment to saying ‘Never Again’ and yet we cannot
even acknowledge this fact and we put diplomats in a position that
I think is totally untenable.”

“The Armenian Assembly welcomes the continued efforts of Senator
Menendez to ensure that the facts of the Armenian Genocide are brought
to the forefront and not denied. We concur with the Senator that the
Administration’s current policy is untenable.” The Assembly strongly
believes that America’s long-term interests would be better served
by speaking the truth and squarely affirming the Armenian Genocide,”
said Armenian Assembly Executive Director Bryan Ardouny. Turkish Plan
to Pay Scholars to Deny the Armenian Genocide

U.S. Assisted In Political Prisoners’ Release?

U.S. ASSISTED IN POLITICAL PRISONERS’ RELEASE?

06:06 pm | July 14, 2011 | Politics

“The United States assisted Armenia in the protection of human rights
and the development democracy.”

This is what U.S. Ambassador to Armenia candidate John Heffern
announced during hearings held at the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee.

Heffern mentioned that Armenia has made certain progress in that
sphere.

“I’m referring to the fact that those deprived of liberty during the
events following the 2008 presidential elections were released this
year,” said Heffern.

Upon “A1+”‘s request, member of the Armenian National Congress (HAK)
Andranik Kocharyan commented on Heffern’s statement.

“Perhaps U.S. and European officials are supporting the democratization
of the Armenian state and the people, but the release of political
prisoners was the result of the people’s struggle for the past three
years,” said Mr. Kocharyan.

http://www.a1plus.am/en/politics/2011/07/14/andranik-qocharyan

FM: "Armenia Responded To Versions"

FM: “ARMENIA RESPONDED TO VERSIONS”

11:39 am | July 14, 2011 | Politics

If Azerbaijan expects to continue to keep its society confused
by distorting the facts, it can’t do the same to the international
community. This is what RA Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandyan announced
in his extensive speech devoted to Armenia’s foreign policy at the
Foreign Institute of Strategic Studies, which is one of the reputable
political science centers in London. Attending the event were political
scientists, journalists, analysts and ambassadors accredited to London.

According to Nalbandyan, from November 2007 to June 2011 the sides
have been presented with a number of working versions for the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict resolution. “Azerbaijan has not given its
consent to any of them, and has simply announced that it can accept
some version with certain reservations. Armenia has definitely
responded to the versions presented in June, October, December of
2010 and June of 2011. Every time, Azerbaijan makes new proposals. It
presented at least 10 proposals in March 2011 in Sochi and another
ten changes during the last meeting in Kazan in June 2011.”

The RA Foreign Minister also announced that Baku is confusing the
public by saying that the Helsinki Final Act mentions the resolution
of conflicts in the frames of territorial integrity. “There is simply
no such thing in the Helsinki Final Act,” said Edward Nalbandyan,

“Of course, what’s also important is that the Deauville declaration
states the inadmissibility of maintaining the status-quo. To achieve
that, it is necessary to implement the three principles and the six
elements that the leaders of the co-chairing countries state in their
declarations. I would like to recall that in those declarations there
is a very important element that Azerbaijan tries to make people
forget or at least push back, and that element is the NK people’s
right to determine the NK’s final status through the expression of
free will that has legal force,” said the RA Foreign Minister.

In response to Baku’s latest statements regarding Karabakh’s future
status, the Armenian foreign minister underlined that before the
final status is determined, the NK will have an interim status that
is exactly what the co-chairs have proposed and what the leader of
Azerbaijan agreed to in Prague in May 2009. “The interim status
means “status quo plus”, that is, all that Nagorno-Karabakh has,
plus international recognition of that status,” said Nalbandyan.

Commenting on the Azerbaijani Foreign Minister’s statement that there
is no sense in wasting time on agreeing on the Basic Principles and
that it would be correct to move on to the elaboration of a peace deal,
Edward Nalbandyan said that Azerbaijan has been saying that over and
over again. The co-chairs have expressed their views on that idea,
saying that if Azerbaijan can’t come to terms on the Basic Principles,
then there can’t be any talk about the elaboration of a peace deal.

Edward Nalbandyan mentioned that Azerbaijan’s approach is the country’s
overt desire to free itself from the Basic Principles presented by
the co-chairs and lead the process of negotiations of the past years
to failure.

http://www.a1plus.am/en/politics/2011/07/14/nalbandyan-london

Georgia Compensated Armenia?

GEORGIA COMPENSATED ARMENIA?

08:12 pm | July 14, 2011 | Politics

President of the “Javakhk” Compatriotic Union Shirak Torosyan says
he thought the Georgian authorities were better than they actually are.

“We Armenians believed in our “good” neighbors a little too much. I
had even announced that the Georgian authorities were finally able to
show good political will regarding at least one issue,” Mr. Torosyan
told “A1+”.

This refers to the clarifications regarding the Georgian parliament’s
changes in the “Civil Code”, which set restrictions on privileges
reserved for four religious communities, including the Armenian
Apostolic Church.

He recalled that during the visit of the Catholicos of All Armenians
to Georgia in June, the Catholicos had discussed the return of at
least six Armenian churches in Tbilisi and the St. Nshan Church in
Akhaltskha. “It turns out that that issue remained unsolved. After
the Georgian parliament’s change, it is up to the Georgian Orthodox
Church to determine what will happen to the Armenian churches.”

According to Mr. Torosyan, Armenian-Georgian relations are currently
two-layered. “The first are official relations that both sides assess
as high-level relations. The second layer is the incident connected
to the Armenian churches. The same goes for the spiritual, cultural
and educational spheres.”

According to ANC member, diplomat Vladimir Karapetyan,
Armenian-Georgian relations are regressing in all spheres. “I regret
to see those relations at a very low level.”

Karapetyan considers the Georgian parliament’s clarifications
compensation to Armenia. “Armenia was among the few countries that
voted against Georgia’s initiative to organize the return of refugees
in the UN. In such cases, Georgia has always stayed neutral when it
came to issues concerning Armenia. The Armenian delegation’s vote
against Georgia’s initiative in the UN had a negative impact on
Armenian-Georgian relations.”

In this context, he also views the fact that for the first time,
the President of Georgia didn’t receive the RA Foreign Minister on
the latter’s visit to the country. “Armenian-Georgian relations are
deteriorating. I think Armenia has to take serious steps at the state
level to fix those relations.”

http://www.a1plus.am/en/politics/2011/07/14/shirak-torosyan

"They Know The Culprits’ Location, But Don’T Sentence"

“THEY KNOW THE CULPRITS’ LOCATION, BUT DON’T SENTENCE”

08:22 pm | July 14, 2011 | Politics

“Serzh Sargsyan’s instruction to bring a new sweep to the investigation
into the case of March 1 is an imitation because no fact has been
cleared up and nobody has been brought to justice for the murders of
the parents’ sons,” Alla Hovhannisyan, mother of Tigran Khachatryan
who died on March 1, told “A1+”.

Hovhannisyan said that the names of the police officer who shot her
son and the commander, Gegham Petrosyan, who instructed to shoot and
do everything possible to prevent the bus from moving forward are
clearly mentioned in the film “Lost Spring of Armenia”.

“However, to this day the investigative group has not interrogated
that police officer,” said Mrs. Hovhannisyan.

The parents hope that their issue will be solved to a certain extent
during the Co-Chairs upcoming visit to Armenia.

As for Serzh Sargsyan’s pledge in Strasbourg that the case will be
revealed by the end of the year and an interim report on the activities
of the investigative group will be released, Alla Hovhannisyan says
she has no hope that anything will change as long as the authorities
and the current investigative group are “trying to reveal the case”.

Alla Hovhannisyan advised Serzh Sargsyan not to confuse the Europeans
or the Armenian society.

“In Strasbourg, Serzh Sargsyan announced that four police officers
had been brought to justice. They were brought to justice for the
operations organized on the morning of March 1, while the police
officers who killed our sons haven’t been condemned and still hold
their posts,” said Alla Hovhannisyan.

http://www.a1plus.am/en/politics/2011/07/14/alla-hovhanisyan