Russia Doesn’t Plan S-300 Missile Systems Sale To Iran

RUSSIA DOESN’T PLAN S-300 MISSILE SYSTEMS SALE TO IRAN

PanARMENIAN.Net
March 13, 2012 – 15:28 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Russia has no plans to resume the sale of S-300
air defense systems to Iran, Russian Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly
Antonov said on Tuesday, March 13, RIA Novosti reported.

“All restrictions imposed by the UN Security Council will be observed,”
the deputy minister said. “I assure you that [the restrictions]
are strictly observed and Russia is not acting in breach of sanctions.”

The $800-million contract to supply Iran with the missile system
was signed at the end of 2007. Russia was to supply five S-300PMU-1
battalions to Tehran.

However, on September 22, 2010, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev
signed a decree cancelling the contract in line with UN Security
Council Resolution 1929, which bans supply to Iran of conventional
weapons including missiles and missile systems, tanks, attack
helicopters, warplanes and ships.

Green Court: Yerevan Park Activists Issue Ultimatum On City Hall

GREEN COURT: YEREVAN PARK ACTIVISTS ISSUE ULTIMATUM ON CITY HALL
By Lilit Arakelyan

ArmeniaNow
14.03.12 | 11:51

Authorities in Yerevan have until Friday to dismantle the kiosks in
a public garden or see environmentalists take the matter into their
own hands, according to a verdict passed by a green “public court”
in Mashtots Park Tuesday.

Enlarge Photo

With real courts reluctant to accept lawsuits against the decision by
the Yerevan municipality to allow the owners of kiosks that had been
dismantled from the Abovyan Street sidewalk to install their property
in what is listed as the city’s green area, dozens of activists of
the environmental movement decided to stage “legal proceedings” of
their own, declaring it to be the first in a series of “public trials”
to defend public property.

Environmentalists threatened that in the absence of an appropriate
decision by the municipality within the next few days they will take
it upon themselves to dismantle the kiosks. They did not elaborate.

Following the event, some members of the movement began a sit-in
action in the venue despite attempts by police to prevent.

Mashtots Park has seen recurrent standoffs between young activists
of the movement and police since early February. In particular, on
several occasions protesters managed to break through police cordons
and enter construction sites to stop construction. None of the action
has turned violent yet.

Activist Artur Grigoryan told ArmeniaNow on Tuesday that holding such
a symbolic ‘civil trial’ was a means of self-expression in favor of
defending public property and having an improved park space.

“Our experience shows that when we turn to courts with such suits, they
do not accept them, arguing that we have no right to make court claims
on public property protection. We are not provided with an opportunity
to defend our rights in the legal domain,” explained Grigoryan.

During the Mashtots Park “court hearing” several members of the
environmental movement on the “plaintiff’s” side presented their
demands to the municipality for the kiosks to be dismantled, invoking
some provisions of the Armenian Constitution, the Land Code, the laws
related to urban development and environmental protection, as well
as the Aarhus Convention, a U.N. document on access to information,
public participation in decision-making and access to justice in
environmental matters that Armenia is also a signatory to. They
claimed that the actions of the city authorities related to Mashtots
Park violated those statutes.

Sona Ayvazyan, the chair of Transparency International’s
Anti-corruption Center, said that under Armenia’s legislation,
construction activities in an area occupying more than 1,500 square
meters need to go through environmental assessment first, something
that hasn’t been done in the case of Mashtots Park.

“In accordance with the rules of urban development no construction is
allowed to be carried out closer than five meters from a growing tree,
but in this case we see that such a distance is less than a meter,”
she added.

Meanwhile, Yerevan mayor Taron Margaryan stressed on various occasions
that no tree would be cut in the park and that allowing kiosk owners
to install their property there was a forced and temporary measure. He
assured the public that the kiosks would be dismantled in a few years’
time when a larger conservation project for the area, called Old
Yerevan, was due to start.

Still, at the “court” proceedings members of the environmental
initiative group presented a document, dated December 30, 2011,
regarding mayor Margaryan’s decision under which a private company,
Eastern Oasis LLC, was granted the right to carry out construction
in an area of 247 square meters at 22/1 Mashtots Blvd. (the territory
of the park) and dispose of it until 2028.

“How can we believe the mayor’s assurances that these kiosks are
going to be there for only a couple of years then?” said Grigoryan.

At the same time, green activists said that lately there had also been
some good news that could also further the cause. In particular, they
said they hailed the decision by the Armenian president not to enact
the amendments to the law on environmental impact assessment that
were passed by the National Assembly last month. Environmentalists
argue that the legislation that has now been sent to parliament for
elaboration contains a number of potential risks, including the risk
that the civil society will be kept largely out of the decision-making
process pertaining to environmental issues.

Yerkir: RPA, ARF, Rule Of Law And Heritage To Present Their Proporti

YERKIR: RPA, ARF, RULE OF LAW AND HERITAGE TO PRESENT THEIR PROPORTIONAL LISTS BY THE END OF THE WEEK

ARMENPRESS
10:31, 14 March, 2012

The paper says thought the deadline for publicizing proportional lists
is March 22, the Republican Party of Armenia, Rule of Law, ARF and
Heritage will present their lists by the end of this week. The paper
says the RPA will publish its list on Thursday after the sitting of
the executive body of the party. By the way, according to the sources
of the daily many are alarmed connected with the lists, some could
not even hide their confused faces even on the day of the congress
of the party. The paper says junior brother of the RPA the Rule of
Law, respecting the elder brother, will publicize its list either
on Friday or Saturday. By the end of the week ARF will too present
its list. The paper says the “Heritage” will publicize the list on
Sunday. According to the paper, though the congress of the Prosperous
Armenia Party is scheduled for March 17, the party will not present
its list on Saturday.

Elina Danielian Qualified For World Cup

ELINA DANIELIAN QUALIFIED FOR WORLD CUP

Panorama.am
14/03/2012

Armenian GM Elina Danielian has been qualified for the World Cup
due to her results recorded in European Women’s Championship held
in Gaziantep, Turkey. In the last round our chess player drew with
Marie Sebag and having scored 7,5 ranked the 8th.

Valentina Gunina, Tatiana Kosintseva and Anna Muzichuk scored 8,5
and ranked the 1st-3rd respectively.

Anna Hayrapetyan defeated Bursa Arig and ranked the 71st, Lilit
Galoyan ranked the 55th, Lilit Mkrtchian and Maria Kursova ranked
the 35th and 38th.

Denial of Armenian Genocide in fact continues this process – Sargsya

Interfax, Russia
March 10 2012

Denial of Armenian Genocide in fact continues this process – Armenian
president

YEREVAN. March 10

The denial of the Armenian Genocide in the Ottoman Empire in fact
continues this process, says Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan.

“We have a clear message to all countries of the world: the denial of
the Armenian Genocide is the continuation of this crime dating back to
the beginning of the last century. Due to Armenia’s and the diaspora’s
efforts, the process of international recognition of the Armenian
Genocide is continuing,” Sargsyan said at the 13th session of the
ruling Republican Party, which he leads.

Speaking about Armenian-Turkish relations, Sargsyan said the border
between the two countries is still closed.

“The developments have shown that the world can see that the only
obstacle to the establishment of relations between Armenia and Turkey
is in Ankara and in one more capital [apparently Azerbaijan]
interfering where it should not, but not in Yerevan,” he said.

Armenia’s foreign policy remains unchanged, Sargsyan said. “We will
continue to meticulously comply with our allied and international
obligations and use any opportunity to promote our national
interests,” he said.

Armenian president re-elected as Republican Party leaderg

ITAR-TASS, Russia
March 10, 2012 Saturday 08:31 PM GMT+4

Armenian president re-elected as Republican Party leader

YEREVAN March 10

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan was re-elected as the leader of the
Republican Party at its congress on Saturday, March 9.

“We are a national conservative party that advocates the exercise of
rights of each of us and the fulfilment of our aspirations. We believe
that our society should develop in conditions of free competition,”
Sargsyan said.

“But under no circumstances can free competition mean the advantage of
large capital and the possibility to use it for strangling and taking
over small competitors,” he said.

The president stressed that the main fortress that guarantees the
existence of the country is the family, “our traditional and
conservative family where the young respect and listen to the elders
and where the woman and mother is the pillar”.

Sargsyan said that Armenia’s policy is based on logical consistency,
clarity and initiative. “We have always been a responsible and
predictable member of the international community that fulfils its
international obligations with pride and diligence,” he said.

“But we also understand clearly that the world around us is not
static, that is it changing. It is necessary to show initiative all
the time in our complex region in order not to be forced to react [to
events] but in order to be a full member and contribute to the
development of the agenda for the region and the world,” the president
said.

As an example, he cited Armenia’s initiative aimed at normalising
relations with Turkey.

« Le boomerang arménien » « Marianne » du 3 au 9 mars 2012 (n° 776)

LOI DE PENALISATION-PRESSE
« Le boomerang arménien » « Marianne » du 3 au 9 mars 2012 (n° 776)

Dans son numéro 776 (du 3 au 9 mars), l’hebdomadaire « Marianne »
revient sur le rejet par le Conseil constitutionnel de la loi de
pénalisation du négationnisme du génocide arménien. Sous le titre « le
boomerang arménien » signé par Eric Conan, le journal écrit qu’après
ce rejet « la loi Gayssot de 1990 pénalisant la négation de
l’extermination des juifs n’est plus à l’abri d’une censure au nom de
la « liberté d’expression » ». Mais « Marianne » fait mine de ne pas
comprendre l’objet même de la Loi de pénalisation en écrivant que
cette dernière devait sanctionner « toute discussion sur le génocide
des Arméniens » ! Comme si cette loi devait interdire la liberté de
parole. Car la discussion sur le génocide des Arméniens était bien
évidemment permise par cette loi, mais la minimisation ou le rejet du
caractère génocidaire du génocide arménien qui devait être sanctionné.

Ci-dessous l’intégralité de l’article.

« Nicolas Sarkozy et François Hollande ne polémiqueront pas à propos
de la censure par le Conseil constitutionnel de la loi pénalisant
toute discussion sur le génocide des Arméniens, votée le 23 janvier.
C’est un camouflet pour les deux : ils avaient soutenu ce texte,
cédant à un clientélisme communautaire dénoncé dans leurs propres
camps. On peut s’inquiéter de cet aveuglement commun tant
l’inconstitutionnalité du texte était annoncée comme certaine par les
juristes, dont Robert Badinter, ancien président du Conseil
constitutionnel. Les juges ont auditionné les motifs d’annulation d’un
texte violant grossièrement, selon eux « le principe d’égalité », « le
principe de séparation des pouvoirs », « la liberté de recherche », «
la liberté d’expression et de communication » ainsi que « la portée
normative » de la loi. Anticonstitutionnelle, cette loi était inutile
et dangereuse. Aujourd’hui, elle dessert la cause qu’elle entendait
servir, son annulation renforçant l’Etat turc, qui l’exploite avec un
cynisme prévisible pour minimiser la tragédie arménienne. Et elle
relance la concurrence des mémoires. Plus question pour ceux qui n’ont
pas obtenu leur texte dédié d’y songer à l’avenir, cette décision
mettant un coup d’arrêt aux législations antérieurs, ka question reste
ouverte. La loi Gayssot de 1990 pénalisant la négation de
l’extermination des juifs n’est plus à l’abri d’une censure au nom de
la « liberté d’expression ». Coïncidence, le grand rabbin de France,
Gilles Bernheim, publie cette semaine un livre (N’oublions pas de
penser la France, Stock) dans lequel il dit ce qu’il pense de la loi
Gayssot : « Les conséquences de l’intervention du législateur sont
plus préjudiciables qu’utiles ».

Krikor Amirzayan

Marianne (n° 776) Le boomerang arméniendimanche 11 mars 2012,
Krikor Amirzayan ©armenews.com

Christofias: Cyprus Belongs to the Cypriots and to No One Else

Cyprus News Agency
March 8 2012

Christofias: Cyprus Belongs to the Cypriots and to No One Else

Nicosia, Mar 8 (CNA) -Cyprus belongs to the Cypriots and to no one
else, President Demetris [Dimitrios] Christofias stressed Thursday
commenting on statements by Turkish Minister of EU Affairs and Chief
Negotiator Egemen Bagis statements about the possibility of
integrating Cyprus’ Turkish occupied areas to Turkey.

Addressing an event, organized in Nicosia on the occasion of the
International Women’s Day, Christofias underlined that the Greek
Cypriot side has shown good will for a settlement the soonest
possible, adding that this does not however mean that we will grant to
anyone the right to impose a settlement.

He said that a solution will be accepted only if is functional and
viable the settlement and it reunites the country, its people, the
institutions and the economy, and it must be based on the
international and the European law and must secure the human rights
and the fundamental freedoms of Cypriot citizens.

“It must be a settlement that will provide for a bizonal, bicommunal
federation with political equality as defined by the relevant UN
Security Council resolutions, with a single state, a single and
undivided sovereignty, a single personality and a single citizenship,”
he noted.

Christofias expressed regret and disappointment over the fact that
Turkey and Turkish Cypriot leader Dervis Eroglu have distanced
themselves from the fundamental principles of the Cyprus problem.

“They are also moving away from the convergences in various chapters
achieved in the framework of the current process of direct
negotiations. And not only this but also recently both Turkey and
Eroglu have been launching threats against us,” Christofias noted.

“It is unacceptable and conflicting to attend the negotiations,
discuss, and at the same time listen to Eroglu making threatening
statements which constitute a major provocation not only for our side
but also for the UN and the EU as well,” he stressed.

Christofias said the Turkish side most often refers to B plans for the
Cyprus problem, which consolidate division and the pseudo-state and
referred to Bagis’ statements about the possibility of integrating
Cyprus’ Turkish areas to Turkey.

He said these statements humiliate first of all the Turkish Cypriots
and sent the message to Bagis and all the Turkish leadership that
“Cyprus belongs to the Cypriots -Greek Cypriots, Turkish Cypriots,
Armenians, Maronites and Latins and to no one else.”

Christofias said that with its arrogance Turkey is even threatening
the EU. “We firmly believe that the UN cannot follow this behaviour
with apathy. The Turkish behaviour constitutes a provocation and an
insult for the UN,” he noted.

Christofias also made clear once again, that the Greek Cypriot side
will not accept any time table and the convening of an international
conference on Cyprus if the preconditions set out by the UN in its
2002 UN resolution are not met.

He also noted that such a conference must be attended by the UN
Security Council permanent members, the guarantor powers, the European
Union, the Republic of Cyprus and the two communities to look into the
international aspects of the Cyprus problem.

Referring to the economy, Christofias said that the government has
taken since the beginning of the crisis measures aiming at boosting
the most important sectors of the economy as well as measures to
support the most vulnerable groups of the population.

The Cypriot President also expressed his conviction that the
forthcoming EU Cypriot Presidency will be successful noting that “we
will keep having our hand extended towards the Turkish Cypriot side,
despite the fact that there is no response so far.”

Referring to the International Women’s Day, Christofias expressed his
respect for all the women of Cyprus, Greek Cypriots, Turkish Cypriots,
Maronites, Armenians and Latins and noted that the promotion of
equality among men and women constitutes an indispensable part of the
effort for greater social cohesion, for a society in which every
citizen will enjoy his or her rights.

Cyprus has been divided since 1974, when Turkey invaded and occupied
its northern third. The leaders of the two communities in Cyprus are
currently engaged in UN-led negotiations with an aim to reunify the
island.

ISTANBUL: Abant tackles contentious issue of drafting new constituti

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
March 9 2012

Abant tackles contentious issue of drafting new constitution

9 March 2012 / TODAY’S ZAMAN, İSTANBUL

As this year’s Abant Platform tackles the pressing issue of shaping
Turkey’s new constitution, a wide spectrum of intellectuals, lawyers,
political leaders and journalists are discussing the problematic areas
of, and proposing solutions to, the constitutional drafting process.
`Deliberations should continue with the spirit of respecting each
other’s thoughts on a given topic. What I say might be right but what
another person says might be right, too,’ said Parliament Speaker
Cemil �içek, who heads the parliamentary Constitutional Reconciliation
Commission, at the opening of the 26th Abant meeting, held from March
9 to 11 in the northwestern province of Bolu. `Somebody says forget it
if the constitution does not include a specific sentence. This is an
aggressive attitude, not one of compromise. Everybody should think
about what happens next in Turkey if no way of compromise is found. It
would not be a process of positive development for the country,’ he
added. �içek said they are not giving directions at the commission
about the way the constitution will be but collect thoughts and ideas.
`It is not the commission but the people who should write the
constitution. We are making it happen, not writing it,’ he said,
stressing the need for the four parties in Parliament to commit
themselves to making it happen.

After the commission collects the views of individuals and
institutions, a draft text will be prepared as of May 1 after which
the opinion of Parliament and the public will be taken again. As a
final step, the necessary changes will be made to the draft text and
presented to Parliament for approval and then to a public referendum.
Levent Köker, a constitutional professor who is the current chairman
of the Abant Platform, said the Parliament that was established after
last year’s June 12 elections represent more than 90 percent of the
society.

`They cannot remain deaf to society’s call for a new constitution,’ he
said in reference to the support from the society to get rid of the
shackles put in place by the country’s 1982 Constitution, which was
passed following the Sept. 12, 1980 military coup, restricting
freedoms. `The debate is going to liven up since the contents of the
constitution will be actively debated soon,’ he added.

Mustafa YeÅ?il, who heads the Journalists and Writers Foundation (GYV),
which has organized the Abant Platform since 1998, said Turkey needs a
new constitution. `As we enter spring and leaving behind winter, we
hope that cold days will be taken over by warm days,’ he said at the
meeting on Friday.

Also at the meeting was ErdoÄ?an Toprak, the opposition Republican
People’s Party (CHP) deputy chairman. `Here we have the opportunity to
make a new constitution if we want a more democratic regime,’ he said.
`However, we should look at issues not only from our side but from
others’ point of view as well in the process.’

The concept of citizenship and how to describe the issue of
citizenship in the new constitution were discussed at the Abant
Platform’s first panel discussion on Friday. In that regard,
Galatasaray University lecturer Birol Caymaz said the description of
citizenship should be inclusive.

On the same line, Rober KoptaÅ?, the editor-in-chief of the
Turkish-Armenian Agos weekly, said he wants to forget that he is an
Armenian.

`Conditions in Turkey constantly remind me that I am an Armenian. This
is a painful fact that I cannot escape from. I’d like to feel that I
belong to this land, and I want to get lost in the crowds. The new
constitution should promise that future to us,’ he said, adding that
Turkey’s Armenians do not want to be treated any differently than
others but just want to be treated as equal citizens.

`Armenians here believe they are second-class citizens. Minority
rights should be guaranteed not with international agreements but with
a consensus in society above those international agreements,’ he also
said.

Speaking on the same topic, Gazi University lecturer Vedat Bilgin said
a definition of `democratic citizenship’ could be the key for solving
problems in relation to citizenship. `The new constitution should
protect micro identities and at the same time allow a macro
transformation,’ he said.

Orhan MiroÄ?lu, a Kurdish writer, said on the same issue, `We should
seek answers to how to keep many identities together. Not meeting
demands is threatening for people. If we don’t solve this problem with
a new constitution, it’s possible that different identities will seek
ways to part ways.’

Participants of the Abant Platform will examine the constitutional
process under the headings of `mother tongue education,’ `local
governments in the balance of a unitary state and autonomy,’ `freedom
of religion,’ `religious education,’ and `the position of the
president in the Constitution.’

Former Supreme Court of Appeals President Sami Selçuk and academics
from various universities and journalists from Turkey’s many dailies
will lead the discussions.

As with every Abant meeting, the platform will release a summary
declaration arising from the discussions’ conclusions. The Abant
Platform is an independent think tank that takes its name from Lake
Abant in the province of Bolu, the location of its first meeting. It
is one of the most well-known programs of the GYV, which was
established in 1994. Its mission and work were inspired by the GYV’s
honorary president, Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen.

http://www.todayszaman.com/news-273842-abant-tackles-contentious-issue-of-drafting-new-constitution.html

In Armenia, Gender Discrimination Just a Scratch Beneath Surface

ianyan magazine
March 9 2012

In Armenia, Gender Discrimination Just a Scratch Beneath Surface

Features – By Victoria Rovira Infante on March 9, 2012 12:00AM

A while back, I was chatting with Naira, an Armenian friend of mine,
who was pregnant at the time. I was asking her whether she and her
husband had picked a name for the baby yet, if they knew which
hospital they would be going to, etc. You know, pregnancy talk. Then
I asked whether her husband would be allowed to stay in the delivery
room, assuming that she would want him at her side. Naira, whom I
consider to be an educated person, was confused by my question… she
replied with a question of her own: `Why would he want to stay?’

To an outsider looking in for the first time, Armenian women seem to
be liberated, especially when compared to women in neighboring Muslim
countries; they can generally dress as they please and go where they
like without fear of persecution or assault, have access to health
care (including birth control) and higher education, and can freely
participate in democratic processes. But a mere scratch on the surface
is enough to reveal that this land is steeped in old-fashioned, macho
values and crisscrossed with clear boundaries separating the roles and
expectations of men and women.

Aside from newsworthy cases of discrimination and domestic violence,
like the infamous 2010 tragedy of Zaruhi Petrosyan, there are
countless instances of blatant sexism that occur every day, unnoticed
and undocumented, for they are seen as nothing unusual. And in some
situations, this mindset leads to discrimination against males as well
as females – locals and foreigners alike.

Most hospitals here don’t permit husbands in the delivery room when
their wives are in labor.

I learned about this policy when an American friend of mine had to
shell out hundreds of U.S. dollars to convince the nurses to let him
remain with his Armenian wife as she delivered their first child in
March 2009. They gave in and let him stay, but kicked him out shortly
after the birth, and he basically didn’t see his wife and newborn son
until they were discharged and he took them home three days later. It
was his story that prompted me to ask Naira about her choice of
hospital when she was expecting. Imagine my dismay at her response.

A lot of people are familiar with the double-standard imposed upon
young men and women – that is, a girl is expected to remain a virgin
until her wedding night, although a boy is expected to enter marriage
with some level of sexual experience – because it is a phenomenon not
unique to this country. Slightly less known, or perhaps just
less-talked about, is the frequency of male infidelity in Armenian
marriages. For example, a female friend relates the following
anecdote:

`I went to a popular disco one night and danced with a guy named
Artur, and we hit it off right away. We started seeing each other
casually, and over drinks one evening, he told me he was really
excited because his wife was pregnant! I didn’t even know he was
married, but apparently, he wasn’t trying to hide that fact.
Obviously, I broke up with him, but what is still so strange to me is
the fact that he felt absolutely no shame in what he was doing.’

Incredibly, I have heard similar stories from other single women,
mostly expats and Western volunteers. Some, who have been here longer
than I have, tell me that such conduct is culturally acceptable. After
speaking to a number of locals and foreigners about this, what I
gather is that many Armenian husbands actually have so much `respect’
for their wives, they consider them sacred, and would never make them
do `dirty’ sexual acts…only gentle love-making and intercourse for the
sake of procreation.

They prefer to satisfy their more carnal desires with another
girlfriend or prostitute and thereby keep their marriage pure and holy
(when in fact, this is how they transmit STDs to their wives). In many
instances, such as when the wife is pregnant or has recently given
birth, this behavior – like pre-marital intercourse – may even be
expected of them. Meanwhile, there is plenty of discussion about what
happens to Armenian women who have extra-marital sex.

Having conversations with the average person here can sometimes feel
like stepping back in time, and not in a good way. When I mentioned to
a colleague the other day that I allow my son to paint his nails
occasionally, she expressed concern: `Aren’t you worried he might like
it?’ No, obviously, I’m not worried, and yes, obviously, he does like
it. So what? It’s a phase, and truthfully, it’s already passed.

This seemingly insignificant dialogue made me wonder about something
much larger. I’ve always been under the impression that parents want
to give their children the whole world, so how can one say to one’s
child, `No, you can only have this half of the world’? This is the
very attitude that leads to misogyny, homophobia, bullying, and
violence against children and adults in schools, in the military, in
families, and in other institutions throughout the country.

I can appreciate the need to preserve certain elements of cultural
heritage, but if it comes at the cost of suppressed individuality and
trampled dreams, is it worth it? Especially when Armenia wants so much
to be recognized as a modern, forward-thinking European nation.
Clinging desperately to harmful `traditional’ values will not get her
there.

So when I want to understand the problems caused by sexual inequality
in Armenia, there’s no longer any need for me to read shocking stories
about bride-napping, red apple ceremonies, and sex-selective abortions
in remote villages, or about the miserable state of sex education in
schools, employer discrimination against married and pregnant women,
and the low visibility of women in politics right here in the capital.
I already know.

As an outsider looking in, even I am not completely safe from the
far-reaching claws of bigotry in my everyday life. I know it when men,
thinking they are being polite, treat me as weak or inferior.

I know it when I raise my voice or make a cynical remark, and people
stare at me in disbelief. I know it when I can’t have an innocent
girls’ night out with my Armenian friends because their boyfriends and
husbands won’t `allow’ them to go out – so much for feelings of
superiority over Iran. The government and people of Armenia have a
long way to go if they aspire to be like France, Canada, the United
States, and other developed countries – whose people are, of course,
still fighting for equal rights themselves.

This article is part of a series written in honor of International Women’s Day

A first-generation Filipino American, Victoria Rovira Infante was born
and raised in the Washington, D.C. area and has also lived extensively
in Florida and California. She earned her B.A. in English and a minor
degree in Environmental Science from the University of South Florida
in 2005. In 2008, she and her husband moved to Yerevan, Armenia to
teach full time at an international school, where their young son is
also a student. She enjoys discovering the past (and therefore, the
present and future) through both travel and the multi-faceted,
ever-evolving written word.

http://www.ianyanmag.com/2012/03/09/in-armenia-gender-discrimination-just-a-scratch-beneath-surface/