‘Deported’ Veers From Realities To Stark Dreams

‘DEPORTED’ VEERS FROM REALITIES TO STARK DREAMS
By Jeffrey Gantz

Globe Correspondent

March 12, 2012

Boston Playwrights’ Theatre

Bobbie Steinbach plays Victoria, a survivor of the Armenian genocide,
and Ken Baltin her husband, Harry, in “Deported / A Dream Play.”

It’s hard to make drama – rather than melodrama – out of genocide. If
sentimentality doesn’t overrun your theater piece, anger is apt
to. Or it all turns into propaganda. Joyce Van Dyke’s “Deported,”
which is getting its world premiere from Boston Playwrights’ Theatre
and Suffolk University at the Modern Theatre, doesn’t entirely avoid
propaganda as it attempts to address the Armenian genocide of 1915.

But for the most part, art trumps politics – thanks in no small part
to the feisty performance of Bobbie Steinbach in a role modeled on
Van Dyke’s Armenian grandmother.

Directed by Judy Braha, “Deported” opens in 1938, in an attic in
Providence. There’s a wooden table and chair, and a wicker basket with
a quilt, and an old-fashioned radio, and a woman’s black hat with a
plume and a rose, and a lantern, and a steamer trunk. And water can
be heard dripping. The lights go down, and when they come back up, a
middle-aged woman is lying on the table and a younger one is sitting
on the steamer trunk. “Take my water,” the older woman says. A panel
in the back wall (which appears to be covered with aluminum foil)
opens and an Armenian line dance threads its way across the stage.

Then the voice of the older woman’s husband intervenes, and she
scrambles out of the Old World clothing she has put on just in time
for them to argue about whether their daughter can go to a party and
why dinner is not on the table promptly at 6 p.m.

“Deported” is subtitled “a dream play,” and for much of its 100 minutes
(there is no intermission), you may wonder whose dream it is.

The older woman, Victoria (Steinbach), is a survivor of the genocide;
so is her friend, Varter (Jeanine Kane), but both women lost
their husbands and their children. And though Victoria is living in
Providence in 1938, with a new husband, Harry (Ken Baltin), Varter is
part of a dream world in which figures from their village in the old
Ottoman Empire pop in and out, from Mr. Nazarian (Robert Najarian),
whom Varter marries at 14, to the Turkish gendarme (Baltin) who tells
the women, after their husbands have been taken away, that they are
being “deported” (that is, sent on a death march) to Syria.

The second act is set 40 years later, in Los Angeles, where Victoria
and Harry have moved. Shoshana Epstein (Liz Hayes), representing a
university oral-history project, has come to interview Victoria. This
part is about Turkish denial and Armenian reluctance to remember,
and both are depicted somewhat heavy-handedly.

In the third act, however, Van Dyke is at her dizzyingly whimsical
best. The year is sometime after 2015, and Victoria appears to have
died and gone to Armenian heaven. Or maybe she’s still dreaming. She
shoots a Turk named Cem (Mark Cohen), but he turns out to be the
grandson of a Turkish officer who fell in love with Varter and
saved her, so he doesn’t die. Besides, he thinks it’s his dream,
not Victoria’s. Victoria’s great-grandson, Matthew (Najarian),
shows up and falls for Shoshana’s daughter, Ruby (Hayes); we learn
why Victoria’s daughter Rose (Kane) is so disaffected from her mother.

There is, if not reconciliation, at least renewal, along with
the suggestion that heaven is really just the ultimate theatrical
production.

Most of the actors here are double and triple cast, and if they barely
differentiate among their roles, that just adds to the oneiric effect.

But it’s Steinbach who grounds “Deported.” When she says, “When you
kill people like that, they live forever,” you know it is not just
a dream but also a nightmare.

Jeffrey Gantz can be reached at [email protected].

http://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/2012/03/11/deported-veers-from-harsh-realities-stark-dreams/5bKYRHmBHWEdbxLnRtXPYL/story.html

Kurds And Assyrians Join Armenian Activists Against Turkish PM In Ge

KURDS AND ASSYRIANS JOIN ARMENIAN ACTIVISTS AGAINST TURKISH PM IN GERMANY

news.am
March 16, 2012 | 00:04

Armenians in Germany are to meet Turkish PM Recep Tayyip Erdogan
with large protest actions. The Kurds, Alawites, and Assyrians will
join the protest actions organized by the Armenians against Erdogan’s
visit to Germany.

As Firat Agency informs that the Central Council of Armenians in
Germany and the Federation of Kurdish organizations in Germany the
Union of Assyrians and the federation of Alawites Unions in Germany
came up with a statement that Erdogan does not deserve the tolerance
award Steiger Award. The organizations are going to conduct a protest
action.

Vrezh Gasparyan Appointed Chief Of The RA National Assembly Staff

VREZH GASPARYAN APPOINTED CHIEF OF THE RA NATIONAL ASSEMBLY STAFF

ARMENPRESS
MARCH 16, 2012
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, MARCH 16, ARMENPRESS. By order of the RA NA Speaker Samvel
Nikoyan from March 16 Vrezh Gasparyan has been appointed in the office
of the Chief of the RA National Assembly Staff.

Before that Vrezh Gasparyan occupied the office of the RA NA Speaker’s
Chief Adviser.

By Samvel Nikoyan’s another order Gagik Mkheyan has been appointed
in the office of the First Deputy of the RA NA Chief of Staff, being
released from the office of the Deputy of the RA NA Chief of Staff
and from the fulfillment of the obligations of the NA Chief of Staff.

Bandages Sold In Armenian Pharmacies Are Shorter And Narrower Than S

BANDAGES SOLD IN ARMENIAN PHARMACIES ARE SHORTER AND NARROWER THAN STATED ON PACKAGE (VIDEO)

news.am
March 15, 2012 | 23:50

Armenian News-NEWS.am was informed from citizens that bandages sold
in the Armenian pharmacies are shorter and narrower than is stated
on the packages. In order to prove that, we bought 2 bandages from
a pharmacy one is 5m X 10 cm and the second 7m X 14cm.

The fraud is obvious, the bandages are narrow by 0.5 cm, the ~Q7
meter~R bandage is shorter than 6 meters, the ~Q5 meter~R bandage
is in reality 4.14 meters. It comes out that in each bandage the
producer lies to the consumer. The producer of the bandages is
LeikoAlex Company in this given case.

Tigran Karapetyan Says Armenian National Congress To Enter Parliamen

TIGRAN KARAPETYAN SAYS ARMENIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS TO ENTER PARLIAMENT HUMILIATED

ARMENPRESS
MARCH 15, 2012
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, MARCH 15, ARMENPRESS. The opposition has never been united
and can never be, leader of People’s Party Tigran Karapetyan told
a news conference today. He said if the Armenian National Congress
enters the parliament it will appear in it humiliated. “Five-seven
MPs will not be able to do anything. Their struggle is not like a
struggle as it is not resolute,” Karapetyan said. He noted that the
ANC cannot be considered opposition.

“It is a union of parties headed by one leader. There can not be
pluralism. How can the first president be opposition?” Karapetyan
questioned.

He urged the people to be truthful as only in that case the political
figures may be just.

Armavia Pledges To Pay $5,3 Mln Debt To Zvartnots By September

ARMAVIA PLEDGES TO PAY $5,3 MLN DEBT TO ZVARTNOTS BY SEPTEMBER

PanARMENIAN.Net
March 15, 2012 – 14:51 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Armenia International Airports CJSC and Armavia
Air Company have reached an agreement by signing a contract.

Armenia International Airports CEO Marcelo Vende told the journalists
on March 15 that they had meetings during the past 4 days with the
working group set up by Armavia and the Armenian Prime Minister Tigran
Sargsyan, in an attempt to find a mutually beneficial solution to
this problem.

“There have been many rumors over this dispute during the recent
days; we decided to make no comment until an agreement is reached,”
Vende said.

Deputy manager of Armenia International Airports CJSC Andranik Shkhyan
informed that the March 15 agreement meets all demands put forward by
Armavia. “We expect the schedule for debt payment to be maintained,”
he said.

Legal adviser of the Armenia International Airports Armen Ter-Tachatyan
noted that the debt totaling to USD 5 mln 300 thous has accumulated
during 6 months. “We expect the debt to be paid off by September. We’ve
set special tariffs, as Armavia demanded. Our company deems such huge
debt unacceptable, and getting this money back is a priority for us,”
he said.

Armavia representatives pledged to devise and submit the company’s
new strategy which will enable them paying off the debt as soon
as possible.

The new rates set by the airport will operate during the coming year.

According to the agreement, the first instalment is due March 31.

Armenia, Korea Interested In The Further Development Of Bilateral Re

ARMENIA, KOREA INTERESTED IN THE FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF BILATERAL RELATIONS

armradio.am
15.03.2012 14:58

The newly appointed Ambassador of the Republic of Korea to Armenia,
Vi Song Lak presented his credentials to President Serzh Sargsyan.

The President congratulated the Ambassador on appointment and voiced
hope that he would contribute to the further deepening of relations
between Armenia and Korea.

The interlocutors underlined that the Armenian-Korean political
dialogue and the reciprocal visits on different levels are an evidence
of the bilateral wish to reinforce and deepen the relations. They
attached importance to the development of cooperation within
international organizations, as well as in the fields of culture
and economy.

The Ambassador of Korea said he was glad to arrive in our country in
the 20th year of establishment of diplomatic relations between Armenia
and Korea and added that he would work to develop the achievements
of the past 20 years.

According to Ambassador Vi Song Lak, President Serzh Sargsyan’s
upcoming visit to the Republic of Korea will give new quality and
content to the Armenian-Korean political dialogue.

Stories Of A Silent Generation: Father-Daughter Filmmakers Set Out T

STORIES OF A SILENT GENERATION: FATHER-DAUGHTER FILMMAKERS SET OUT TO TELL FAMILY STORY
BY ABBY ALEXANIAN

ASBAREZ

Thur. March 15, 2012

I don’t speak Armenian. I’ve never been to the Republic of Armenia. I
rarely eat the food or attend Armenian Church services. But I can’t
shake the feeling that I am definitely Armenian. Yet as much as I feel
that I am Armenian, I also can’t seem to figure out what that means.

Human beings are “meaning makers” – we turn our memories into stories
that give meaning to the past. Meaning helps us understand pain and
joy, it teaches us about ourselves, and it gives us various parts of
our identities. Family histories especially confer meaning on each
new generation; in many ways, our family stories create us. Yet what
happens when those stories are immensely painful? And what happens
when these stories in particular are not told?

Whenever my dad talked about growing up in an Armenian family
in Worcester, Massachusetts, the life he described always felt so
foreign to me that he and I might have grown up in entirely different
countries. I cherished those rare stories I heard about my dad’s
childhood – like how he spent afternoons with his grandfather on
the second floor of his family’s tenement, speaking only Armenian
and learning woodworking. Yet his family had been desperately poor;
life hadn’t been easy, but even amidst the difficulties – or perhaps
because of them – his family maintained the Armenian way of life that
my dad’s grandparents carried with them from the old country.

There are many things about my Armenian family that I learned only in
small bits and pieces scattered through my childhood, or that I never
knew until I started asking questions. For instance: the grandfather
that my dad spent so much time with as a boy was a survivor of the
1915 Armenian Genocide, and my grandmother’s mother saw her husband,
three daughters, and parents killed before she was marched through
the desert for months. These were not the stories I heard growing up.

The genocide is not often spoken of, even amongst Armenians, and this
silence has carried scars of its own. An undercurrent of deep unhealed
pain runs through the Armenian’s identity, and even if we know little
of the genocide, our ancient heritage, or the vanishing traditions –
this pain touches us.

But how are we supposed to make sense of this pain? When silence
replaces stories, we grasp at meaning but have nothing to hold onto.

For the children of the silent generations, any identity we receive
from our part-Armenian-ness consists almost entirely of wanting to
have more of it, to know more of it, and to be more of it. Michael J.

Arlen, son of an Armenian father and a Greek-American mother, begins
his memoir Passage to Ararat with this very idea: “At a particular time
in my life, I set out on a voyage to discover for myself what it is
to be Armenian. For although I myself am Armenian, or part Armenian,
until then I knew nothing about either Armenians or Armenia.” A
generation of Armenians was swallowed by the genocide in 1915, but
now a new generation of Armenians is threatened with extinction as
well, though of a different sort: for the great-grandchildren of the
survivors, Armenia is losing its meaning.

How can we go about creating meaning where what we have encountered
most often is silence? We can start by looking for the stories.

The silence in my family has started to relax, mostly because my dad
and I decided to make a film about it. Our documentary, tentatively
titled Journey to Armenia: Three Generations from Genocide, will
be the story of our trips together to the Republic of Armenia and
Eastern Turkey (aka Western Armenia), beginning with our first trip
this summer. Like archeologists of our own family history, we will
visit the four villages that our family members fled from almost a
hundred years ago. And in the process, we hope to learn more about
what being Armenian really means.

Learn more about the film at Kickstarter or visit the film’s Facebook
page:

http://asbarez.com/101701/stories-of-a-silent-generation-father-daughter-filmmakers-set-out-to-tell-family-story/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Journey-to-Armenia-Three-Generations-from-Genocide/131000973689205

Non, Le Conseil Constitutionnel N’A Pas Constitutionnalise Le Negati

NON, LE CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL N’A PAS CONSTITUTIONNALISE LE NEGATIONNISME

Le Monde

15 mars 2012
France

par Hubert Lesaffre, docteur en droit public membre du Centre de
droit international de l’universite Paris-Ouest-Nanterre-La Defense

Dans la decision qu’il vient de rendre le 28 fevier 2012, le conseil
constitutionnel a censure une disposition qui visait a inserer dans
la loi du 29 juillet 1881 sur la liberte de la presse l’interdiction
de contester ou de minimiser de facon outrancière les genocides
“reconnus comme tels par la loi francaise”. D’aucuns y ont vu une
forme de legalisation par le conseil du negationnisme, sacrifiant ainsi
les victimes de genocides sur l’autel de la liberte d’expression. La
realite juridique est neanmoins toute autre.

Il est exact que le conseil a rappele, et qui en disconviendrait,
s’inscrivant ainsi dans la droite ligne de sa propre jurisprudence,
et de celle de la Cour europeenne des droits de l’homme, que la
liberte d’expression etait “d’autant plus precieuse que son exercice
est une condition de la democratie et l’une des garanties du respect
des autres droits et libertes”.

Mais en aucune facon il n’a considere que cette liberte interdisait
au legislateur, en toute circonstance, de decider d’incriminer des
comportements negationnistes ; qu’en effet il a egalement rappele
qu’il etait loisible au parlement de reprimer les abus de la liberte
d’expression pour preserver l’ordre public et les droits des tiers.

Ce qu’a exactement dit le conseil, cela merite d’etre rappele, c’est
qu’en reprimant la contestation de l’existence et de la qualification
juridique de crimes “qu’il aurait lui-meme reconnus et qualifies
comme tels”, le legislateur a porte une atteinte inconstitutionnelle
a l’exercice de la liberte d’expression. C’est la le c~ur de sa
decision. C’est le fait qu’il ait “lui-meme” etabli une realite
historique puis qualifie juridiquement de genocide ladite realite qui
a commande la censure du legislateur. Cela signifie simplement que
l’histoire relève des historiens, et que la qualification juridique
d’un comportement relève, elle, des tribunaux.

En revanche, rien dans cette decision ne saurait predire la future
censure de la loi Gayssot. Non parce que les victimes du genocide
commis pendant la seconde guerre mondiale seraient plus victimes
que les autres, mais parce qu’il existe des jugements de tribunaux
internationaux et nationaux revetus de l’autorite de la chose jugee
qui ont reconnu et qualifie ce genocide. Ainsi, la loi Gayssot, qui
ne consacre pas elle-meme l’existence du genocide, ne constitue pas
une loi dite memorielle.

Constitutionnellement parlant, il existe bien une difference de
situation qui justifie cette difference de traitement et ne meconnait
donc pas le principe d’egalite entre les victimes. Il est vrai en
revanche que rien ne justifie que la contestation des genocides qui
ont eux aussi fait l’objet d’une condamnation par une juridiction
penale internationale, comme c’est le cas pour les massacres commis a
Srebrenica et au Rwanda, ne soit pas egalement punie. La decision du
conseil, ainsi que la decision cadre du Conseil de l’Union europeenne
sur la lutte contre certaines formes et manifestations de racisme et
de xenophobie, loin de brider la vocation legitime et necessaire du
parlement a combattre le negationnisme, l’invite donc au contraire
a le faire de manière uniforme, sur la base de decisions rendues par
des juridictions internationales.

Il est en outre un autre element essentiel a la constitutionnalite d’un
dispositif general de repression du negationnisme, celui de l’intention
de nuire. Car en effet, ce qui est condamnable et condamne dans le
negationnisme, ce n’est pas tant la contestation de tel ou tel fait
historique en tant que telle, mais l’incitation a la haine a l’egard
d’un groupe de personnes que cette contestation sous-tend.

C’est ce qu’avait rappele la Cour europeenne des droits de l’homme
dans l’affaire Garaudy.

Enfin, s’agissant du genocide armenien dont les bourreaux ont
aujourd’hui disparu et ne peuvent donc plus faire l’objet d’une
condamnation penale, toute solution juridictionnelle n’est pas
inenvisageable. A l’echelle internationale, une saisine de la Cour
internationale de justice par l’Armenie serait une solution ideale,
et pourquoi pas d’ailleurs eventuellement par tout autre Etat,
le genocide etant le crime international par excellence. A cela il
existe neanmoins un important obstacle procedural, dans la mesure
où la competence de cette Cour est tributaire de l’accord des Etats
parties a un differend, et donc de la Turquie elle-meme.

Reste une solution qui etonnamment ne semble pas avoir ete envisagee,
celle-la a l’echelle de l’Europe, d’une saisine de la Cour europeenne
des droits de l’homme par l’Armenie contre la Turquie sur le
fondement d’un negationnisme d’Etat, lui-meme assurement contraire a
la liberte d’expression. Une telle demarche pourrait aboutir, sinon
a la condamnation de la Turquie, du moins a la reconnaissance par la
Cour d’un genocide attribuable a l’empire Ottoman.

Aussi dans cette affaire ne doit-on pas blâmer le conseil
constitutionnel. Au contraire, puisque ce qu’il a affirme en
realite, c’est que la liberte d’expression ne saurait varier selon
les alternances politiques. En effet, droite et gauche se font
necessairement une idee distincte des marqueurs de l’histoire. Et on
mesure combien il serait perilleux pour la liberte d’expression qu’en
fonction des changements de majorite au parlement il devienne prohibe
de discuter la realite de tel ou tel fait historique, realite qui
elle-meme varierait selon les sensibilites de tels deputes ou tels
senateurs. La liberte d’expression serait alors l’otage du debat
politique la où, bien commun de chacun, elle est la condition meme
de ce debat.

http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2012/03/15/non-le-conseil-constitutionnel-n-a-pas-constitutionnalise-le-negationnisme_1669076_3232.html

US State Department: "We Urge Azerbaijan And Armenia To Prepare Thei

US STATE DEPARTMENT: “WE URGE AZERBAIJAN AND ARMENIA TO PREPARE THEIR POPULATIONS FOR PEACE, NOT WAR”

APA
March 15 2012
Azerbaijan

Baku. Victoria Dementieva – APA. “As a Co-Chair of the OSCE Minsk
Group, the United States remains firmly committed to assisting the
sides in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict reach a lasting and peaceful
settlement”, press service of the US State Department said, APA
reports.

“There is no military solution to this conflict. We urge the sides
to prepare their populations for peace, not war, and to refrain from
any provocative rhetoric or actions on the ground”.