Film Series at ALMA: "Genocide revealed: the Ukrainian Holodomor"

PRESS RELEASE
Armenian Library & Museum of America
65 Main St., Watertown, MA. 02472
Tel: 617-926-2562
Web:
Email: [email protected]

Sunday, May 6, 2012

ARMENIAN LIBRARY AND MUSEUM OF AMERICA
invites you to

“Genocide Revealed”

Holodomor, the Ukrainian Genocide of 1932-1933

Film Screening at ALMA

EVENT INFORMATION

Date & Time
Sunday, May 6
2:00PM

Admission
Free
Open to the public

Movie length: 75 min.

Refreshments following film

Location
ALMA’s Contemporary Art Gallery 3rd Floor

Museum Hours
(Sunday)
12:00PM to 6:00PM

Continuing with its film series, ALMA will host the projection of
“Genocide Revealed:

Holodomor, the Ukrainian Genocide of 1932-1933” on Sunday, May 6 at
2:00pm.

“Genocide Revealed” is a gripping documentary on the 1932-1933 Famine
Genocide in Soviet Ukraine when millions were deliberately starved to
death by Stalin’s regime; it also describes the accompanying
destruction of Ukraine’s religious, academic, cultural and political
leadership.

The film was produced, directed and edited by award-winning Montreal
filmmaker, Yurij Luhovy. It won numerous awards at US and
international film festivals in 2011, including the Albert Award for
Best Documentary at the Litchfield Hills Film Festival; the “Best
Audience” Award for best historical documentary and the Special
“Eye-Opener” Award at the Film Festival of Colorado; and the Best
Historical Film Award at the Honolulu Film Awards.

Please join us in learning about this forgotten tragedy.

Upcoming Events at ALMA

Sunday, May 20 – 2 p.m.

“Bound for Glory: 500 years of Armenian printing from ALMA’s
Collection”

This year marks the 500th anniversary of the first Armenian printed
book (published in Venice in 1512). Drawing on ALMA’s extensive
collection of antiquarian and modern publications, this exhibit will
highlight the creation of the Armenian alphabet and literature,
handwritten masterpieces, the development of Armenian printing around
the world, and an examination of the types of books printed.

Free with Museum admission

ARMENIAN LIBRARY AND MUSEUM OF AMERICA, Inc.
65 Main Street, Watertown MA 02472
617-926-2562 –

http://www.almainc.org/
www.almainc.org

Area Armenians Mark Anniversary Of Genocide

AREA ARMENIANS MARK ANNIVERSARY OF GENOCIDE
by Johanna Weidner

The Guelph Mercury (Ontario, Canada)
April 23, 2012 Monday

April 24 needs to be marked not only by Armenians but by all people
who want to stand up against genocide in the past and future.

On that day in 1915, Ottoman Turkish forces began the roundup and
mass killings of Armenians. An estimated 1.5 million Armenians died
in what is now widely viewed as the first genocide of the 20th century.

“It happened to everyone and it has the potential to happen to anyone,”
said J.P. Assadourian, chair of the Armenian National Committee’s
southwestern Ontario chapter.

The local chapter commemorated the 97th anniversary of the genocide
on Sunday at the Armenian Community Centre in Cambridge. A wreath in
honour of the hundreds of thousands who died.

April 24 is marked by Armenian communities around the world with
ceremonies and peaceful demonstrations in a decades-long fight to
get the Turkish government to acknowledge the killings.

“We will never stop,” Assadourian said.

He said that dark chapter in history must be talked about openly for
both the sake of Armenians and also the Turkish people, who have the
right to know about the nation’s past.

“They have been denied the facts of what has happened in their
history,” Assadourian said.

Holding nations accountable for genocide is also a warning to others
that the systematic extermination of a people will not be overlooked
or forgotten, he said.

The Turkish government does not recognize the First World War-era
genocide, saying the figure is inflated and the deaths occurred in
the civil unrest during the Ottoman Empire’s collapse.

“The Armenian nation will never forget the genocide and the Turkish
nation is reluctant to admit it happened,” said keynote speaker Hayg
Oshagan, a professor in the communication department at Wayne State
University in Michigan.

But he said it’s essential for the neighbouring nations to come to
an agreement about that time, regardless of how difficult it may be
to make reparations for the immeasurable loss.

“Nations are really reluctant to admit this sort of thing about their
past,” Oshagan said.

Despite the denials by the Turkish government, he said, the truth is
apparent through the eyewitness reports, photographs and records of
assets seized from Armenians as they were forced out of Turkey and
marched into the desert.

“It’s uncontested the genocide occurred,” Oshagan said.

“There’s tons of documentation on what has happened.”

Canada’s Parliament in 2004 backed a resolution condemning the actions
of the Ottoman Turkish forces, calling it unequivocally a genocide
and crime against humanity. The move was denounced by Turkey, accusing
Canadian legislators for blindly following those with marginal views.

Oshagan believes the Turks will eventually have to come to terms
with what happened. Until then, he said the fight will continue
among Armenians scattered around the globe even as almost 100 years
have passed.

“It’s our duty to our ancestors and our nation.”

Armenia-Set Film "Here" Opens In U.S.

ARMENIA-SET FILM “HERE” OPENS IN U.S.

Published: Friday April 27, 2012

Braden King filming HERE in Armenia. Courtesy image

Armenia itself is a character in Braden King’s movie, “Here”

Here and now

New York – “Here” premiered at the 2011 Sundance and Berlin Film
Festivals and has gone on to screen throughout the world. A live
installation version of the project, HERE [THE STORY SLEEPS], premiered
at The Museum of Modern Art in 2010, travelled to Mass MoCA and was
mounted at the 2011 Sundance and Houston Cinema Arts Festivals.

Tamar Gasparian spoke with filmmaker Braden King after a successful
New York City premiere earlier this month and just before HERE opens
in Los Angeles on April 27 and in San Francisco on May 11.

Q: Tell us about the journey that brought you HERE.

A: It’s been a long and winding road. Lately I’ve been comparing the
process to archaeology. Most films come about in a more architectural
way. A filmmaker has an idea that he or she wants to realize,
sketches it out and builds it. HERE was more of an expedition into
the unknown. I was following the breadcrumbs, looking for clues. I
started pulling this string many years ago, and it eventually led me
to these characters, this story and to Armenia itself. It’s been an
expanding, satisfying, mysterious journey. In many ways, the film is
a document of that process.

Q: HERE is opening in all these cities with significant Armenian
populations in the same month as Armenians all over the world are
commemorating the Armenian Genocide. However, HERE is not about the
Armenian past. HERE is about today’s Armenia. It is about the ordinary
people and two main characters, Will (Ben Foster) and Gadarine (Lubna
Azabal), whose story begins and develops on the roads of Armenia,
against the gorgeous landscape of the country. It is an interesting
coincidence that the U.S. premieres are in April, isn’t it?

A: It is. This film has always worked in mysterious ways. HERE somewhat
studiously avoids direct political commentary, but the occupation of
the American mapmaker, Will Shepard, can never truly be an apolitical
act. Any time you’re drawing a line on a map, you’re changing the
world – for better or for worse.

There is a kind of freedom from history that Will’s traveling partner,
Gadarine Najarian, represents. She’s very interested in the NOW, and
yet she discovers that there are these deep roots and traditions that
run deeply, if unconsciously, through her. The film asks questions
about how we can exist in a way that’s liberated from history and
tradition while simultaneously appreciating it, acknowledging it and
paying tribute to it. I’m not Armenian, but I think these themes are
universal – they exist to one degree or another in every culture,
every family, in all of us.

Q: During your opening remarks at the NYC premiere you explained that
the open space left in the frame of the film was there on purpose,
for the viewer to explore and use that space. Also, during one of our
conversations several months ago, you told me about the triangles
that you created with the characters. Tell us more about the space
and the shapes you have created within the frame of the film.

A: Films are not only about the stories they tell. There is a lot of
space within these images but there is also a lot of space within the
experience of HERE for the viewer to wander around in, on their own.

I wanted to make a film that would allow a viewer to inhabit it,
not just watch it. That is kind of a big ask for some viewers. The
characters are almost silently saying, “Come. Join us. You don’t have
to just sit back and watch.” The people who are most affected by the
film seem to be able to say yes to that proposition. I definitely
encourage viewers to let Will and Gadarine wander off on their own
every once in a while and to just explore these images, aside from
the story, in their own time and in their own way.

In terms of the triangulation you’re asking about – that’s a mapping
term and practice that goes back to geometry. If you know the length
of two sides of a right triangle you can calculate the third via
the Pythagorean Theorem. But I don’t think this idea only applies
to mathematics. We do this kind of thing in so many different ways
in our lives. Our relationships and experiences are like points on a
map – we use them to orient ourselves and to measure and make sense
of our world. We thought about this kind of thing a lot when writing
the film. How do we map our existence? What is the distance between
A and B? How do I get there? With who?

Q: In the film, I see Armenia as a country of breathtaking landscapes
and kind people, who are happy to share their food and homemade vodka
with strangers passing by. However, some acquaintances of mine were
unhappy with the images of Armenians as poor and constantly drinking.

They expected to see Armenia at its best and interpreted the images
in the film as anything but. How did you see Armenia and Armenians?

A: I can understand the desire to see Armenia portrayed as one
might wish it to be, to only point the camera at the new Northern
Boulevard in Yerevan and to avoid less “developed” locations. But
that’s simply not the truth on the ground. Almost everything you see
in HERE is real. There are very few sets – perhaps one, actually. Many
of the characters are played by non-actors. The script is based on
extensive research and travel that took place from 2004 – 2009. In
some respects the film can be seen as a documentary with a fictional
narrative mapped on to it – at least in its portrayal of the landscape
and locations circa 2009, when it was shot.

I see very little poverty in these images. I see life. I see
strength. I see poetry. I see warmth, hospitality and love. We went out
of our way to photograph Armenia and its people in a neutral, objective
manner. This is a gorgeous, complicated country and culture. We made
a great effort to capture it as we found it. I see nothing in the
film that one cannot take profound pride in, and I would encourage
anyone who sees it to travel this road for themselves, to discover
the beauty, resilience and warmth of this landscape, this culture
and these incredible people.

Q: When I saw the film for the very first time, I was pleasantly
shocked. In the film, you noticed and captured something that, when
I was a child, had fascinated me and made me wonder if anyone else
noticed it. I am referring to the window of the bus that for several
seconds takes over the entire screen, reminding me of my childhood.

There are many reasons why I love this film, but that scene reinforced
it.

A: My methodology on HERE had a lot to do with being quiet – looking,
listening, observing. I tried to set up a situation in which the
cast, crew and I could explore ourselves in the same ways that the
film’s characters do. We were constantly asking, “What does it feel
like when one travels in this way? What do we remember? What does
an experience look like when it’s recalled years later in fleeting,
fragmentary images?” It’s gratifying to hear about the ways in which
that bus window connected you back to your childhood. It means that,
at least for that moment, we did our job the way we intended.

Q: I love the music in HERE. Are you planning to release a soundtrack
and when can we expect the film on DVD?

A: We are going to release a soundtrack, most likely around the time
of the DVD release, in July. I’m so proud of the music that composer
Michael Krassner and Boxhead Ensemble created. All of it was recorded
in Armenia, at the end of production. In many cases, it was recorded in
the very locations in which the film was shot, with additional sessions
at the Sergei Parajanov museum and at a disused Soviet recording studio
on the outskirts of Yerevan that used to belong to Melodia records.

The group featured Michael Krassner, Shahzad Ismaily, Laraine
Kaizer, Eyvind Kang and Jessika Kenney with Vartan Baghdasaryan,
Karine Hovhannisyan, Jim Becker and Tim Rutili. It’s a combination
of musical cultures, recorded in an environment that was foreign for
many of them. I think that sense of displacement and wonder comes
across in the beautiful, very mysterious music they created.

For more on the film link to

http://www.reporter.am/go/article/2012-04-27-armenia-set-film–here–opens-in-u-s-
http://www.herefilm.com/

Souls In Unrest

SOULS IN UNREST
By Jackie Hong

April 23, 2012

Recognizing different perspectives about the Armenian Genocide for
its 97th anniversary.

Almost a century and three generations separate Sevan Hajinian from
the Armenian genocide, but that doesn’t make what happened any easier
to comprehend. The upcoming anniversary of the Armenian genocide on
April 24 only makes it more difficult.

“When the month of April comes, it’s really a sad month for us,”
Hajinian says. Not only has Hajinian studied the genocide since she
was a teenager, but her family was also directly impacted by it – her
great-grandmother saw six of her seven children killed before she fled
the Ottoman Empire to Syria with her only son, Hajinian’s grandfather.

“He was always telling us he remembers walking through the desert
and getting to Syria, how tough it was for them to start all over,”
Hajinian says of her grandfather, who died in 1982.

Hajinian’s story is not an isolated one. From 1915 to 1923,
around 1.5 million Armenians in the Ottoman Empire were killed by
government forces, the first action being the deportation of 250
Armenian intellectuals on April 24, 1915. Many of the deaths were
the result of deportations, where Armenians were marched out of the
country and left in the Syrian desert. Along the way, thousands died
from starvation, exhaustion, and attacks on the convoys.

By 1923, the worldwide population of Armenians had dropped from 4
million to 2.5 million. The Armenians that fled were dispersed around
the Middle East, and many eventually moved to North America. Today,
it is estimated that around 70,000 Armenians are living in Canada,
with Toronto having the largest Armenian community in the country.

The genocide label, although widely accepted, still stirs up
controversy 97 years after the fact.

Armenians have long been advocating for the events to be recognized
as genocide, and April 24 is a national day of remembrance in Armenia.

Over 20 countries, including Canada, have acknowledged the genocide, as
well as 43 states in the United States and two provinces in Australia,
even though the federal governments have not.

Genocide scholars and many historians support the label, deeming it
“the first genocide of the 20th century.” Scholars say that the
systematic approach the Ottoman Empire used to kill Armenians and
decimate Armenian culture are in line with the UN Genocide Convention,
a resolution enacted in 1951 that legally defines genocide.

The genocide resonates with younger generation of Armenian-Canadians
as well.

“It still continues to affect us just because the people who are
descendents of the genocide [survivors] have had to go through so many
things,” says Daron Mardirossian, president of the Armenian Students’
Association at Ryerson University.

“A lot of people were traumatized, weren’t able to have children,
weren’t able to lead normal lives afterwards,” he says. Like
Hajinian, Mardirossian has personal ties with the genocide – his
great-grandparents on his father’s side were business owners and
mayors in the Ottoman Empire, and were forced to leave everything
behind when escaping the violence.

However the Turkish community has a very different view on what
happened.

“There’s no genocide to revoke,” says Demir Delen, former president
of the Federation of Canadian Turkish Associations. His view is
shared by most Turkish scholars and some historians. Delen has spent
over four decades researching the history of the Ottoman Empire and
Armenian community.

“In order to understand the events of 1915, you have to really look
at the historical context,” says Delen. “It’s in the middle of the
First World War.”

At the time, Turkey was facing attacks from British and Russian
forces. There were Armenians enlisted in Russian and Turkish armies,
and it was believed that Armenians in Turkey were aiding the Russians.

“It was a purely military decision… to move the Armenians that
lived in the eastern Anatolia [where the Russians were attacking]
out of the way so they couldn’t assist the enemy,” says Delen.

Delen notes that over a million Turks and Muslims were killed during
the time of the genocide. He cites scholars’ lack of willingness to
look at Turkish accounts of what happened as the reason the Turkish
perspective is under-represented.

Delen also dismisses the governments who have recognized the genocide.

“These are not historians, they are politicians,” Delen says. “How
many of them even know the area or what happened?”

Along with academics, the genocide is a hot topic in the political
world.

Turkey strongly rejects the notion that a genocide happened. It has
arrested journalists who acknowledge the genocide under Article 301
of the Penal Code, which makes insulting Turkey and “Turkish-ness”
illegal.

There have also been deadly consequences. Hrant Dink, a Turkish-born
Armenian journalist who wrote about Armenian identity and the genocide,
was assassinated outside his Istanbul office in 2007 by a Turkish
nationalist.

As well, Turkish and French relations were strained earlier this year
when France passed a bill, later revoked by Senate, that would have
made denying the Armenian genocide illegal. The Turkish government
froze military, economic, and political ties with France and accused
French president Nicolas Sarkozy of trying to grab the votes of
France’s Armenians population, estimated to be around 500,000.

Turkey’s resistance to the genocide label has only strengthened
Armenians’ resolve to have it recognized.

“It gives us more reason to commemorate the events,” says Daniel
Ohanian, president of Armen Karo Student Association. The association
is a national body offers resources to Armenian university-student
groups.

Ohanian points out initiatives that spread awareness of the genocide
in Toronto. The Toronto District School Board has included a section
on the Armenian genocide in its Grade 11 genocide course, and every
year near the end of April, a vigil commemorating the genocide is
held at Queen’s Park.

Sevan Hajinian though, will not be in the city come April 24. Along
with hundreds of Armenians from across the country, Hajinian will be
heading to Ottawa.

“It’s a thank-you rally in front of Parliament [for recognizing the
genocide], and then we walk to the Turkish embassy,” she says of the
annual event. “We don’t have any problem with the Turkish people,
the problem is the government, who is denying the genocide.”

“Our souls will not rest ’til the perpetrators are brought to justice.”

http://ryersonfolio.com/souls-in-unrest

Kim Kardashian Informs Yahoo News Washington Bureau Chief On Armenia

KIM KARDASHIAN INFORMS YAHOO NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU CHIEF ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

news.am
April 28, 2012 | 00:44

Every year the White House Correspondents’ Dinner is held with the
participation of the President, journalists, accredited for the White
House, political scientists, public figures and the Hollywood elite.

ABC TV channel presented a range of series of famous histories on
meetings and dinner curiosities told by famous journalists. Yahoo
News Washington Bureau Chief David Chalian told such news.

“The most surprising conversation I had at a dinner was a few years
back when I was introduced to Kim Kardashian and she became intrigued
by my last name’s Armenian heritage. She began to educate me about
the Armenian genocide well beyond anything I had ever known prior to
meeting the Hollywood starlet.

It was a good thing she steered the conversation and informed me all
about this issue near and dear to her because I had never seen her
reality TV show and didn’t know what we would talk about. Who would
think?” Chalian said.

Armenian And Russian MFAs Hold Discussion In Yerevan

ARMENIAN AND RUSSIAN MFAS HOLD DISCUSSION IN YEREVAN

news.am
April 27, 2012 | 19:23

YEREVAN. – Armenian and Russian MFA representatives held a discussion
on North America on Friday in Yerevan. The Russian MFA delegation was
led by American Department director Alexander Darchiev, the Armenian
MFA delegation was led by Deputy FM Ashot Hovakimyan.

Ashot Hovakimyan stressed the importance of such discussions. He also
mentioned that Armenia stands for the development of normal relations
between Russia and the USA as their relations affect the condition
in the Middle East and South Caucasus.

Alexander Darchiev mentioned that such discussions are especially
important regarded military alliance.

Armenian Ex-FM Is U.S. Intelligence Agent – Politician

ARMENIAN EX-FM IS U.S. INTELLIGENCE AGENT – POLITICIAN

PanARMENIAN.Net
April 27, 2012 – 15:09 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Former Foreign Minister of Armenia and second number
of Prosperous Armenia party’s candidates list Vartan Oskanian is an
American intelligence agent, leader of “Constitutional Right Union”
party said.

“Foreign policy Robert Kocharian pursued was complementary, backed by
American spy Vartan Oskanian,” Hayk Babukhanyan said, dwelling on the
foreign policy of the second president of Armenia Robert Kocharian
and the recently formed “Ter-Petrossian – Kocharian” union.

He further slammed Oskanian’s following statement “Armenia needs
Libyan, Tunisian or Egyptian scenario.”

“The statement discloses the true goals Mr. Oskanian and
“Ter-Petrossian – Kocharian” union pursue,” he said.

According to Babukhanyan, this implies Armenia’s withdrawal from the
Eurasian Union and establishment of U.S. control over Armenia.

“Withdrawal of Russian military base form Armenia, entry to Iran’s
northern borders and establishment of control over us… This is the
program Oskanian explicitly named. Levon Ter-Petrossian talked about
it back in 1988,” he said.

On April 26 Artsakh Republic President Bako Sahakyan Visited The Vil

ON APRIL 26 ARTSAKH REPUBLIC PRESIDENT BAKO SAHAKYAN VISITED THE VILLAGE OF SOS IN THE MARTOUNI REGION AND MET THE LOCAL POPULATION.

Friday, 27 April 2012 10:04

The visit was caused by the request addressed to the President the
day before by a group of villagers concerning the activities of the
community’s head.

Having listened to the villagers’ opinions on the issue the President
stressed that the community was the primary level of governance that
presupposes effective functioning of other levels.

Hence, issues existing here are on the spotlight of the authorities’
attention. Bako Sahakyan entrusted the NKR Cabinet of Ministers,
the Public Prosecutor’s Office and Police to investigate in details
the situation and submit corresponding suggestions.

http://artsakhtert.com/eng/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=648:on-april-26-artsakh-republic-president-bako-sahakyan-visited-the-village-of-sos-in-the-martouni-region-and-met-the-local-population&catid=11:official&Itemid=23

Medicine: Tireless crusader for organ donation

The Telegraph-Journal (New Brunswick) Canada
April 24, 2012 Tuesday

Tireless crusader for organ donation; Advocacy After receiving three
organs, Saint John’s Kevin Standing says he’s simply happy to be
alive. Now he wants to increase the odds for others

by Jennifer pritchett Telegraph-Journal

SAINT JOHN – Kevin Standing is alive because two people died.

Since 1995, the 48-year-old diabetic has received a kidney, pancreas
and a liver in three organ transplants. And now, his replacement
kidney is failing and he’ll eventually need another transplant.

But despite it all, Standing is a tireless crusader to boost public
awareness about organ donation so that more people will sign up and
save a life after theirs has been taken away.

“We’re all designed to be recycled,” he says, with a laugh.

His latest challenge is to break the Guinness World Record this Friday
for the largest human awareness ribbon in support of national organ
and tissue donor awareness week, which runs April 22 through 28.

Standing and the committee he helped found, the New Brunswick Organ
&Tissue Donation Network, are hoping to create a live human ribbon
near Saint John’s waterfront with 4,000 people – one for each person
waiting for an organ transplant in Canada.

Last year alone, 195 people died before a donor could be found,
according to the Canadian Association of Transplantation.

Standing wants to change the odds for people waiting.

“Up to eight people can live from a death,” he says. “You can take the
corneas, heart, lungs, liver, pancreas and kidneys.”

Standing would like to see the provincial government make it easier
for New Brunswickers to become donors by making it possible to sign up
online, like other provinces such as Ontario and Manitoba already have
in place.

In an interview at an uptown Saint John coffee shop a few days before
the ribbon event, he’s boisterous and chatty, eager to talk about the
project. Dressed in a green-plaid flannel shirt and jeans, he sports a
salt-and-pepper beard and seemingly never stops smiling or talking. He
appears to have bounds of energy.

Standing is a man who has come close to death a handful of times and
is thrilled to be alive. He makes every minute count and it shows.

“I’m thankful to be alive, very thankful,” he says. “Words really
can’t express the gratitude I feel for that person who gave me his or
her (organ) after selflessly signing that card. I wouldn’t be around.”

Standing attributes his wife Tina and a multitude of friends with
helping him through the tough times. The couple lives in the north end
of the city with four dogs and two cats.

Kevork Peltekian, medical director for the Atlantic multi-organ
transplant program liver team, stresses the importance of organ
donation.

“The wait can take anywhere from a few months to a year … there is a
need for organ donation in Canada,” he says. “People die on the wait
list.”

The Halifax-based liver disease specialist says the donor rate in
Canada is less than 15 donors per million (population), while the rate
for some European countries is much higher, including Spain, which has
more than 40 donors per million. In Atlantic Canada, he said, it’s
between 15 and 20 donors per million.

“I think the best thing a person can do is not just sign their
donation card, but they should make it clear to their family members
and their loved ones what their wishes are,” he says.

In Atlantic Canada, 264 people are on the transplant list or at
various stages of work-up before listing. Of those, 142 are from Nova
Scotia, 61 from New Brunswick, 16 from Prince Edward Island and 45 are
from Newfoundland.

Peltekian says in order to increase the rates of organ donation, there
needs to be more awareness and discussion about it. He says that
having someone like Standing speak about it, is vital and key to
getting the message out.

“Transplant quite literally runs in his blood,” he says.

Standing’s health problems go back to his youth when he was diagnosed
with diabetes at age 12.

In the years that followed, he had trouble regulating his blood sugars
because testing methods were still somewhat rudimentary during the
1970s and 1980s. At that time, there was no blood glucose measuring
devices; blood sugars could only be tested through a urine test.

The sugar spikes eventually took their toll on his body and by the
early 1990s his kidneys were failing.

He was 31.

“I started bloating and got very tired,” he says. “My pallor changed
to a sickened yellow because of excess urea building up because your
body can’t get rid of that stuff.”

At the same time, he developed diabetic retinopathy and his vision was failing.

Legally blind but still with a little vision, Standing got on a plane
in the fall of 1994 and went to Toronto to go to St. Michael’s
Hospital. Without an appointment but armed with all the courage and
determination he could muster, he found his way to the subway and
eventually made it to the doctor’s office. He saw a specialist that
day and the doctor did emergency laser therapy, which helped save his
vision.

Within a few weeks, he was receiving treatment in Moncton to re-attach
his retina and his eyesight was saved.

Today, he has 20/30 vision.

But soon after his eyesight improved, Standing’s kidneys worsened and
he had to go on dialysis.

“My vision was coming along, but the kidney failed,” he recalls.

In 1995, his oldest brother, Arthur, came forward to say he would
donate one of his kidneys. While it was good news, Standing remembers
feeling uncomfortable accepting the kidney.

“I remember wiring his house for him afterward because I was so
grateful,” he jokes.

After the kidney transplant, Standing’s health steadily improved. He
got married a couple of years later and had gone back to work. Life
was good.

Then doctors approached him about the possibility of doing a pancreas
transplant, which would allow his body to produce insulin again and he
would no longer be a diabetic.

And so, at 3 a.m. on Jan. 3, 1999, he got the call at his home in
Saint John and headed down to Halifax, where the transplant was done
at the Queen Elizabeth II Hospital.

Standing remembers saying a little prayer to be able to see his wife again.

“This could be the last time I wake up,” he recalls thinking at the time.

The surgery went well and his body accepted the pancreas, but he ended
up spending three months in the hospital because of a serious
infection similar to flesh-eating disease that nearly killed him. He
says he lost more than 40 pounds in three weeks as a result of the
infection.

“I was rotting from the inside out,” he recalls. “You’d come in my
room and think: Who left the dead racoon in the bed? ”

After 12 surgeries that saw doctors manually remove the infection and
pus, it finally cleared.

Eventually, he was able to go home to Saint John with a new pancreas,
which allowed him to stop injecting insulin.

Standing had that pancreas for two and a half years before it stopped
producing insulin and it had to be removed. In 2002, he went back to
being a diabetic.

But as the years went on, his liver function went downhill and he
eventually learned he would have to have a third transplant. He was
suffering from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, which describes the
accumulation of fat in the liver of people who drink little or no
alcohol.

Beginning in the summer of 2010, Standing languished at home waiting
for a new liver. Nine months later, he got a call from the transplant
committee in Halifax on Feb. 15, 2011.

Despite the snowy weather that day, his wife drove him to the Queen
Elizabeth II Hospital and he had the transplant surgery, which lasted
18 hours. He received as many as 30 pints of blood during the
operation.

“A year later, it’s doing what it’s supposed to do,” he says.

These days his problem is his failing kidney.

Still, he remains optimistic and dedicated to promoting organ donation.

His longtime family doctor Margaret MacCallum describes him as someone
who’s dedicated to advocating for other peoples’ health – even when
his own health is not doing well.

“He’s lived through a lot of this, but he still seems to have the
energy to advocate for others, which is amazing,” she says.

Standing says it’s his way of giving back.

“I’m so thankful to have had a second, third, and fourth chance,” he
says, with a beaming smile. “I’m proof that this process works. People
don’t have to die waiting.”

BAKU: ‘Israel needs strong Azerbaijan’

‘Israel needs strong Azerbaijan’

Fri 27 April 2012 06:31 GMT | 7:31 Local Time
Alexander Goldenstein

News.Az interviews Alexander Goldenstein, editor-in-chief of the
Israeli-Russian IzRus.co.il portal and an expert on the South Caucasus.

Israeli Foreign Minister A.Lieberman told journalist during the visit to
Baku that Azerbaijan can mediate between Israel and Arab world. Does it
mean that after worsening of ties with Turkey Israel started to seriously
view Azerbaijan as a perspective bridge of dialogue to the Arab world?

Last summer, the envoy of the Palestinian Autonomy in Azerbaijan Nasir
Abdul Kerim noted that `official Baku has close ties with Israel’ and
therefore Azerbaijan can become a mediator in the Palestine-Israel
conflict. Last year the head of the Azerbaijan-Israel association Joseph
Shagal told me that if the political leadership of Azerbaijan would
consider the position of a mediator in Israeli-Palestinian confrontation
promising, it would naturally use its all resources (Azerbaijan has more
resources than it may seem) to take this position and have maximum benefit
from it.

But as this did not happen in the twenty years of the Israeli-Azerbaijani
diplomatic ties, logic hints that the Azerbaijani leadership has more
important foreign policy problems than mediation in the relations between
Jerusalem and Ramallah which require immediate solution at the current
moment. And this does not mean the relations between Israel and Turkey
since Ankara was not a good mediator in the past. The matter is just about
that the more the number of mediators is, the lower are chances to achieve
peaceful solution. This is related both to the conflict between
Palestinians and Israel and many other conflicts.

Does the refutation of the information by Lieberman about Israel’s plans
to
use Azerbaijani airdromes for an offensive against Iran mean that there is
really no such plan?

Mr.Lieberman holds the position of the Israeli Foreign Minister, which
means he has everything alright with his brains. Which statement did you
expect from him? Only an insane would say: `Yes, we have the bases in
Azerbaijan and we will use them against Iran when necessary’. This would
be
a great fool to say so, since such a statement would make so many `waves’
that it would overweigh any tsunami. In particular, this would sever ties
between Baku and Jerusalem. I think our government, in particular,
Lieberman, who is one of the main architects of these relations, can hardly
have this in their plans.

Do you think the absence of the anti-Iranian rhetoric of the Israeli
Foreign Minister will influence the clear annoyance of Iran with the
Azerbaijani-Israeli cooperation and the very fact of Lieberman’s visit to
Baku?

Iran’s rhetoric will not change as long as there is Israel. And as soon as
there is the current regime in Iran, thanks to which the citizens of the
country are impoverishing, while Tehran quarreled with almost the entire
world, the Iranian government will need an external enemy. If not Israel,
then the United States or Britain. Or, probably, Iceland. It is comfortable
to have a weak, phlegmatic enemy whom no one is able to find on the map=85
thus the visit of Lieberman and his meeting with the government of
Azerbaijan annoys and outrages the Iranian government.

During the Azerbaijani-Israeli talks in Baku, the parties discussed mutual
interaction in the UN Security Council. On which issues can the parties
cooperate within this structure?

There are a number of problems that require settlement in the world. And
the matter is related not to Israeli settlements whose termination will not
stop massacres in Syria, the riots in Bahrain or the quarrel between Sudan
and Southern Sudan. Israel’s termination will also not prevent Iran from
making a stir in the whole region including in the South Caucasus. The
sweet words of dazed Europeans and mendacious Arabs in UN will not stop
clashes and famine in Africa. There are many real problems in the world and
therefore our countries can and must cooperate.

Azerbaijan supported the initiative of Palestine in UN on the
international recognition of the Palestinian state. May this circumstance
hinder the interaction between Azerbaijan and Israel within this
organization?

Azerbaijan is a Muslim country which is under constant pressing of other
Muslim states. It does not matter for Azerbaijan whether Palestine will
appear on the map as an independent state or not. Therefore, it would be
odd to expect Baku to speak against this initiative. Israel understands it
well, since there is no difference for us since it is for the UN Security
Council to decide, therefore Azerbaijan could vote against or abstain, it
would not influence the overall situation. By supporting the initiative of
the Palestinian Autonomy, official Baku preserved its positions among
Muslim states, while it is not a secret that Israel needs strong Azerbaijan.

F.H.
News.Az