More Syrian-Armenian children arrives in Armenia for summer vacation

Third group of Syrian-Armenian children arrives in Armenia for summer vacation

news.am
August 22, 2012 | 13:25

YEREVAN. – The third group of Syrian-Armenian children has arrived in
Armenia Tuesday to spend its summer vacation in the country. Close to
150 children arrived in Armenia with two airplanes.

Numerous officials – including Diaspora Minister Hranush Hakobyan, First
Deputy Minister of Territorial Administration Vache Terteryan, and
Deputy FM Sergey Manasaryan – had come to capital city Yerevan’s
Zvartnots International Airport to welcome the
Syrian-Armenian – specifically, Aleppo-Armenian – children.

A group of Damascus-Armenian children, who are currently spending
their summer vacation at a camp in Armenia’s Hankavan city – and who
soon will return to Damascus – likewise had come to welcome their peers.

Prior to the Aleppo-Armenian children’s arrival, the children from
Damascus told Armenian News-NEWS.am that they spent a very good time
in Armenia and they wish to visit it again.

And upon their arrival, the children from Aleppo were welcomed by a
round of applause. Some of them had set foot on Armenia for the first
time. Reflecting on the current situation in Aleppo, the children
expressed a hope that the situation would improve.

To note, around 60,000 Armenians live in Syria, and great majority of
them reside in Aleppo and Damascus.

Il y a autour de 15 000 arméniens à Sofia

BULGARIE
Il y a autour de 15 000 arméniens à Sofia

« Il y a autour de 15000 arméniens à Sofia, qui ont besoin de leur
propre église et la municipalité les aide pour cela » a déclaré le
Maire de Sofia Yordanka Fandakova en inspectant la construction de la
nouvelle Église arménienne à Sofia.

La construction de l’église apostolique arménienne a commencé en 2006.
Ainsi La municipalité de Sofia a alloué quelque 160 000 lev bulgare
pour le projet (81800).

« Nous avons rejoint le projet il y a quelques années avec une aide
financière de 100000 lev du fonds de privatisation, tandis que l’année
dernière nous avons pourvu encore 60000 lev. C’est un engagement très
important de la municipalité, depuis Sofia est un symbole de tolérance
religieuse et ethnique » a fait remarqué Fandakova.

mercredi 22 août 2012,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

Iran looks to Armenia to skirt bank sanctions

Reuters
Aug 21 2012

Exclusive: Iran looks to Armenia to skirt bank sanctions

By Louis Charbonneau

UNITED NATIONS | Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:25pm EDT

(Reuters) – With international sanctions squeezing Iran, the Islamic
Republic is seeking to expand its banking foothold in the Caucasus
nation of Armenia to make up for difficulties in countries it used to
rely on to do business, according to diplomats and documents.

Iran’s growing interest in its neighbor Armenia, a mountainous,
landlocked country of about 3.3 million people, comes at a time of
rising international isolation for Tehran and increasing scrutiny by
Western governments and intelligence agencies of Iranian banking ties
worldwide as they attempt to stifle the country’s nuclear program.

The most recent example is British bank Standard Chartered (STAN.L),
which has been in the spotlight due to U.S. charges that it hid from
U.S. regulators and shareholders some $250 billion of transactions
tied to Iran.

An expanded local-currency foothold in a neighbor like Armenia, a
former Soviet republic which has close trade ties to Iran and is
working hard to forge closer links to the European Union, could make
it easier for Tehran to obfuscate payments to and from foreign clients
and deceive Western intelligence agencies trying to prevent it from
expanding its nuclear and missile programs.

Armenian officials denied illicit banking links to Iran. The country’s
central bank issued a press release in response to this article,
stating that it requires all banks to scrutinize their transactions to
avoid dubious financial exchanges.

“The Central Bank of Armenia will follow its supervision over the
behavior and transactions of all financial institutions and their
customers in … Armenia, in order to safeguard its financial system
from any destabilizing effects,” it said.

While the four rounds of U.N. sanctions remain limited, with only two
Iran banks blacklisted by the Security Council, the United States and
European Union have implemented much tougher restrictions, sanctioning
dozens of banks and other firms and making it increasingly difficult
for Tehran to conduct business in U.S. dollars and euros.

A U.N. panel of experts that monitors compliance with the sanctions
against Tehran recently submitted a report to the U.N. Security
Council’s Iran sanctions committee that concluded Iran was constantly
searching for ways to skirt restrictions on its banking sector.

“One state bordering Iran informed the Panel of requests from Iran to
open new financial institutions,” the report said. “The requests were
not pursued apparently because of that country’s burdensome
legislation.”

Several U.N. diplomats familiar with the panel’s work confirmed that
the unnamed state was Armenia, where Iran already has banking ties.

Despite Armenia’s denials of illegal banking arrangements, Iran has
not given up trying to expand in the country, the diplomats said, and
U.S. officials have repeatedly cautioned Armenian colleagues to
tighten financial controls.

REPORTS AND DENIALS

Iran’s trade with Armenia, including an oil pipeline that Armenian
news reports say should be finished in 2014, requires some form of
cross-border banking. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has said
that Iran’s annual trade with Armenia is around $1 billion, according
to Iranian news reports.

Engaging in transactions with Iranian banks is not a violation of
international sanctions as long as it is not linked to Iran’s nuclear
or missile programs or companies or individuals under U.S., EU or U.N.
sanctions.

Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful and refuses to shut it
down. It says the sanctions are illegal.

But Washington has made clear to governments around the world that
trading with Iranian firms that are sanctioned by the United States
could lead to a U.S. blacklisting.

A Western intelligence report shown to Reuters, and dated May 2012,
said that Iran was searching for “convenient” locations to develop
alternative banking relationships away from spy agencies and other
international monitoring bodies. It said an expanded presence in
Armenia was one of Iran’s goals.

“The Central Bank of Iran (CBI) has been operating for years to
establish and develop concealed infrastructures to enable Iran to
continue trading with foreign countries, particularly in countries
convenient for Iranian activity, such as the UAE (United Arab
Emirates) and Turkey,” the report said.

“The increasing pressure on the banks in some of these countries has
forced CBI economists to seek financial alternatives in countries that
do not work according to the dictates of the West,” it said, naming
Armenia as a target.

In addition to Turkey and UAE, diplomats say Iran has been trying to
develop financial channels elsewhere to avoid sanctions, focusing on
countries like Malaysia, China, India, Brazil and, according to a
report in the New York Times last weekend, Iraq.

Iran has used Iraqi banks to move large amounts of cash into the
international banking system, prompting private U.S. protests to
Baghdad, the Times reported.

Regarding Armenia, the Western intelligence report cited Armenian bank
ACBA Credit Agricole Bank, a full-service institution that does
business with individuals and companies and had some $574 million in
assets last year, as one of Iran’s principal targets.

A Western U.N. diplomat who closely follows the sanctions on Tehran
confirmed that ACBA was “a bank that has come up in connection with
Iran.” He declined to provide details of any potentially illicit ACBA
transactions linked to Iran.

Ashot Osipyan, chairman of the Union of Armenia’s Banks, said it was
impossible ACBA had any ties with Iran. “Armenian banks are financing
only Armenia’s economy,” he said.

ACBA Chief Executive Officer Stepan Gishian was similarly categorical
in his denial of helping Iran skirt sanctions.

“We finance exclusively the economy of Armenia,” he said. “We don’t
have any relationship with Iran. We never have, we don’t now and
furthermore we don’t plan on becoming a channel for financing Iran.
What you’re saying is complete nonsense.”

The central bank statement said that “banks in the Republic of
Armenia, including ‘ACBA-Credit Agricole Bank’ CJSC, hold no
correspondent accounts with banks and financial institutions in the
Islamic Republic of Iran.”

Washington recently raised its concerns with Armenian officials about
the possibility that Iran could exploit Armenia to bypass sanctions.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton discussed the issue with President
Serzh Sargsyan during a June meeting in Yerevan, a senior State
Department official said.

The precise content of the discussions and the outcome were unclear.

CLAMP DOWN

Diplomats and intelligence officials told Reuters that Turkey and the
UAE remain Iran’s principal banking connections, while China and India
are becoming areas of concern as Tehran now finds it difficult to
conduct transactions in U.S. dollars and euros. As a result, it has
turned increasingly to doing business in less-traceable local
currencies.

But Turkey and the UAE, they say, are not as welcoming these days. The
two countries are under intense pressure from Washington and the
European Union to clamp down on illicit Iranian commerce connected to
a nuclear program that the Western powers and their allies suspect is
for producing weapons – a charge Iran denies.

Another bank that has long concerned Western powers is the Armenian
branch of Iran’s Bank Mellat, which has been under U.S. sanctions
since 2007. While Mellat is not under U.N. sanctions, the Security
Council cited it as a problematic bank in the text of its fourth
sanctions resolution, passed in June 2010.

“Over the last seven years, Bank Mellat has facilitated hundreds of
millions of dollars in transactions for Iranian nuclear, missile, and
defense entities,” the resolution said.

Mellat is still functioning in Yerevan, though its activities have
drastically decreased due to U.S. and EU sanctions, according to
Arakel Meliksetyan, deputy head of the financial intelligence unit at
Armenia’s central bank.

The central bank statement said that Mellat’s Armenian assets
decreased more than 50 percent from $88 million to $40 million between
December 31, 2010 and July 1, 2012.

Mellat is cut off from the U.S., European and other financial markets
and has virtually no business with other Armenian banks, Meliksetyan
said. Since it was disconnected from the SWIFT system earlier this
year, Mellat Armenia is no longer able to send or receive
international wire transfers, he added.

He said the bank’s small customers were mainly Iranians doing business
in Armenia, Armenians exporting to Iran, Iranians with Armenian
backgrounds and students.

The Mellat Armenian branch’s website () has photos of
a brightly lit, ordinary-looking bank with the words “Accuracy,
Courtesy, Efficiency” at the top. It lists two men with Iranian names
as the general manager and deputy general manager and gives a P.O. box
for an address.

Reuters contacted the bank for responses to questions about its
activities. After initially agreeing to a face-to-face discussion, the
officials said they wanted written questions and have not provided
further comment.

Turkey was in a similar position to Armenia’s once. Reuters reported
in 2010 that Turkey was becoming a safe haven for Iranian banks. In
response to heavy U.S. pressure to cut banking ties with Tehran,
Western envoys say, Turkish banks have become much more cautious about
doing business with Iranian clients.

U.S. concerns about Armenia’s commitment to implementing sanctions
against Iranian banks are not new, according to previously secret U.S.
diplomatic cables published by WikiLeaks.

A May 2007 cable from the U.S. embassy in Yerevan, entitled “Armenia
Slow To Implement Bank Sepah Asset Freeze,” said that Sepah, an
Iranian bank which has been under U.N. sanctions since March 2007,
maintained correspondent accounts with the Armenian branch of Mellat
in breach of U.N. restrictions.

Another cable from 2008 made clear Washington was still worried:
“Poloff (Political Office) requested that the Armenian MFA (ministry
of foreign affairs) advise the Central Bank of Armenia to employ extra
vigilance in monitoring the financial transaction of the Iranian owned
Bank Mellat in Yerevan.”

(Additional reporting by Thomas Grove, Steve Gutterman and Nastassia
Astrasheuskaya in Moscow, Andrew Quinn in Washington, Hasmik Lazarian
in Yerevan and Andrei Makhovsky in Minsk. Editing by Warren Strobel
and Jim Loney)

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/21/us-iran-sanctions-armenia-idUSBRE87K05420120821
www.mellatbank.am

NK Independence Fight Sends Caucasus Region on the Brink of War

PolicyMic
Aug 21 2012

Nagorno Karabakh Independence Fight Sends Caucasus Region on the Brink of War

Haykaram Nahapetyan

Several days ago, Nagorno-Karabakh’s army conducted maneuvers and
practiced counter-offensive drills. Nagorno-Karabakh, a mountainous
territory with a population of about 140,000, has been at the center
of a frozen conflict in the South Caucuses. Most recently, the
Armenian-populated Karabakh’s army exercises followed Azerbaijan’s
large-scale maneuvers in July.

While Karabakh’s Ministry of Defense is trying to remain calm, anxiety
is growing in Washington, DC over the renewed conflict.

First, some history: In July 1921, the Bolshevik Party’s Caucasian
bureau adopted two conflicting decisions. First, it assigned
Nagorno-Karabakh to Soviet Armenia, but changed its mind within 24
hours under Stalin’s pressure, and adopted a new decision to form an
autonomous district with an Armenian-populated region within Soviet
Azerbaijan. Throughout the following decades, tensions have risen and
eventually resulted in a full-blown war. With some 30,000 dead and
more than a million displaced, a ceasefire was established in 1994,
with Armenians controlling the majority of the former Nagorno-Karabakh
autonomous district, plus several adjacent regions, which are largely
referred to as a `buffer zone.’ Since then, peace negotiations have
been led by the United States, Russia, and France, the Co-Chairs of
the Minsk Group, which was created in 1992 by the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe to help settle the Nagorno-Karabakh
dispute.

Although Nagorno-Karabakh has proclaimed its independence, it is not
recognized by any country. The State Houses of Rhode Island and
Massachusetts adopted resolutions supporting Nagorno-Karabakh
Republic’s independence in May and July of 2012, respectively, thus
opening a new chapter in Karabakh’s efforts to gain international
attention. During the past years, Karabakh has adopted a constitution,
opened offices in several countries, including the U.S., France,
Russia, and Germany, and elected three presidents. The incumbent
president Bako Sahakyan was reelected in July. However, about 20 years
of peace negotiations have resulted in no peace. And no war.

In recent years, tensions have escalated. Baku’s military budget is
nearing four billion, although some claim Baku artificially inflates
the number, including its spending on police and even reconstruction
of the courthouses, into its military budget list.

However, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research
Institute, Azerbaijan ranked first in the world in its increase of its
military spending in 2011 – 88%. Armenian’s military spending is about
$400 million annually.

This growing military budget, along with almost routine ceasefire
violations, has exacerbated the arms race and may contribute to
another Caucasian war.

According to Russian analyst Aleksander Khramchikhin, `the likelihood
of a new war in NK reached 99.99%.’ The mediators continue to appease
the parties amid anxiety. Washington-based analysts Jeff Mankoff
(CSIS), Stephen Blank (SSI), Thomas de Waal (Carnegie foundation),
Jeff Goldstein (OSI) as well as the officials at the Department of
State and White House have called the parties to refrain from a
military solution.

The newly appointed U.S. Ambassador to Azerbaijan, Richard
Morningstar, mentioned during his meeting with the U.S.-Azerbaijani
community members: `peace in Karabakh will be beneficial for all
parties.’

http://www.policymic.com/articles/13193/nagorno-karabakh-independence-fight-sends-caucasus-region-on-the-brink-of-war

ASALA says it will attack Turkey if Turkey intervenes in Syria

DigitalJournal.com
Aug 21 2012

ASALA says it will attack Turkey if Turkey intervenes in Syria

By Paul Iddon

The Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia, a terrorist
organization that has been inactive for quite some time has today told
Turkey that it would launch attacks if Turkey were to take military
action against Syria.

A short report from the Turkish Hurriyet Daily News quoted the
Armenian terrorist organization as saying it would attack Turkey if it
was to violate the “security” of Syria’s Armenia community.

The organization — which has been relatively inactive and largely
disbanded since the 1980’s — said in its statement that it would
launch “counter measures,” against Turkey if Turkey continued with
what it dubbed a “conspiratorial and hostile policy,” with regard to
its southern neighbour.

Similarly, the news site Trend also quoted the ASALA statement as
outlining that, “Any military adventurism or any direct or indirect
violation of the security and the social cohesion of the Armenian
community of Syria on the part of Turkey will be met by similar
counter measures.”

The ASALA also claimed that Turkey has become a “threat” to the
regions stability. It elaborated on this statement by stating that,
“The aggressive policy against Iraq’s integrity, the direct military
intervention in the bloody crisis in Syria, the continuation for more
than 20 years of blockade imposed on Armenia, the conspiratorial and
double-faced policy towards Iran, the non-stopping threats against the
territorial integrity of Greece and Cyprus and the augmenting coercive
measures against the Kurdish people have transformed Turkey into a
center of danger for the stability of the region. The conspiratorial
and hostile policy of the Turkish state against the neighbouring
countries reached its peak and has led Turkey in a total isolation in
the whole region.”

Some 60,000 Armenians live in Syria. About 2,000 of them have left
Syria and went to Armenia to escape the war-ravaged Syrian state.

The ASALA also expressed in its statement “our solidarity to all the
peoples of the area and we declare that the Arab people will decide
its destiny and shape its future all alone without the crocodilian
tears and hypocritical care of the Turkish ruling circles.”

Turkey had in the past been an ally of the Bashar al-Assad regime in
Damascus, however now it is one of the most focal critics of the
Syrian regimes crackdown and has supported and hosted the opposition
Free Syrian Army which is striving to topple the Assad regime.

Read more:

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/331255#ixzz24Ea6RXmL

Syrian Conflict Not Just Battle Against Assad

The Washington Note
August 20, 2012 Monday 2:25 PM EST

Syrian Conflict Not Just Battle Against Assad

Reuters/Benoit Tessier

The New Yorker has just published a gripping, must read piece for
those following the horrible convulsions inside Syria titled “The War
Within” by Jon Lee Anderson on the diverse array of bosses,
ideologues, thugs and strategists animating the Syrian opposition
today.

I highly recommend it — and think that his characterization of the
conflict as now indisputably a civil war is sobering, particularly for
those advocating deep intervention by the US and Europe:

For months, policymakers and pundits have debated whether Syria was in
a state of civil war. Today, it undeniably is, but not in the
schoolbook sense of the phrase, with its connotation of two tidily
opposed sides–Yanks and Rebs squaring off at Antietam. Instead, the
war comprises a bewildering assortment of factions. Most of the
rebels, like seventy-five per cent of Syria’s citizens, are Sunni
Arabs, while the Assad regime is dominated by Alawites, members of a
Shiite offshoot that makes up about eleven per cent of the population.
But the country also has Christians of several sects, Kurds,
non-Alawite Shiites, and Turkomans, along with Palestinians,
Armenians, Druze, Bedouin nomads, and even some Gypsies. Each group
has its own political and economic interests and traditional
alliances, some of which overlap and some of which conflict. There are
Kurds who are close to the regime and others who are opposed. Around
the cities of Hama and Homs, the regime’s paramilitary thugs are
Alawite; in Aleppo, hired Sunnis often do the dirty work.

Another clip that I wanted to share mentions a Syrian opposition
chief, an Islamist “who calls himself Abu Anas”, relying on Google
Earth and lap top video clips of his fighters. Anderson profiles a
number of key opposition personalities, all driven by radically
different impulses but for now united in opposing Bashar al-Assad. Abu
Anas heads the Islamist group that bombed the inner sanctum of Syrian
military intelligence killing al-Assad’s closest military chiefs and
brother-in-law and resulting in al-Assad’s brother losing his leg:

A young aide brought some photo-copied Google Earth maps of Azaz, and
Abu Anas, pointing out what had been the enemy’s key positions,
explained how the rebels had taken the town. “First, we cut off their
water and electricity,” he said. “Then we gradually surrounded them
and shot at them and tried to get them to fire back at us until they
ran out of ammunition.” The final battle had stretched for twenty-four
hours, he said, and ended only when some of Assad’s soldiers began
defecting. On a laptop, he showed a film clip, in which his men fired
furiously at regime soldiers inside the mosque and then surged inside
themselves. “We killed and captured some and some escaped,” he said.
“They tried to get out of town, but we ambushed and killed most of
them.” Abu Anas had taken some wounded men prisoners, but found that
he didn’t have enough medicine even for his own fighters. “We couldn’t
look after them, so we let them die,” he said.

The stories emerging of house to house killings by Syrian
regime-supporting thugs as well as the summary executions of Syrian
soldiers and captured officials by Syrian opposition forces while
horrible don’t quite convey the degree to which the internal tensions
are not only a zero sum game between opposition and regime. Jon Lee
Anderson conveys this well in his essay.

The internal complexity of a future Syria — made worse by meddling
neighbors and superpowers — will most likely make this an ongoing
horror story with few answers, and a platform of convenience for proxy
fights between interests tied to Russia, Iran and China and those
supported by the US, Europe, Turkey and Sunni-led governments in the
region.

— Steve Clemons is Washington Editor at Large at The Atlantic, where
this post first appeared.

Clashes reported in Aleppo’s Armenian districts

Clashes reported in Aleppo’s Armenian districts

tert.am
17:11 – 21.08.12

The Armenian districts in Syria’s capital, Aleppo, have come under the
opposition’s control, recent reports on the Internet suggest.

Speaking to Tert.am, a spokesperson for the city’s Armenian Prelacy,
Zhirayr Reisyan, said those districts are now facing clashes.

`Nothing about occupation is at issue, but there are clashes. They
extend, for example, from the Jdayde district to al-Suleimanieh,
occasionally reaching al-Midan,’ he said.

Reisian noted that despite the continuing clashes, the situation in
the above districts (which are predominantly populated by Armenians)
is not likely to result in a battle.

In a video message posted on Facebook on Monday, the Free Syrian Army
said it was heading towards several districts. It asked the Christian
population for assistance and non-interference in their operations.

YerPhI – on the path from an Institute to a technozone

YerPhI – on the path from an Institute to a technozone
by Samvel Sarksyan

arminfo
Tuesday, August 21, 14:20

The processes of reformation of the Yerevan Physics Institute
(YerPhI) and preparation for creation of a Nuclear Medicine Center in
its territory have caused serious excitement. The dust has obviously
settled due to clarification of many issues worrying the staff of the
well-known scientific center.

The YerPhI scientists were most of all afraid that after the YerPhI’s
reformation into a foundation, which would mostly be engaged in the
applied aspect of nuclear physics, the state would reduce the
financing, and the key directions of the Institute’s activity would be
neglected.

These fears were intensified by the ambiguous developments around
YerPhI and the ambiguous behavior of their initiators. The main
developments were going on in 2011. For instance, on 1 September 2012
the Government of Armenia adopted a resolution on reformation of the
state non-commercial organization National Scientific Laboratory named
after A.I.Alikhanyan into `Alikhanyan National Scientific Laboratory
(Yerevan Physics Institute) Foundation’. A few days later, the fellows
of the Institute, Doctors of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Rouben
Lazarian and Hamlet Lazarian said at a press conference that the
process of reformation was going on without any discussion with the
Institute’s staff and without their consent. Moreover, they said that
80 out of 130 research workers signed a letter addressed to the
authorities to demand discussing the issues related to the reformation
of the Institute and development of the fundamental science in the
country. A meeting convened in summer with participation of 54
research workers of YerPhI demanded stopping the process of
reformation.

YerPhI Director, Professor Ashot Chilingaryan tells ArmInfo that the
fears of part of YerPhI’s staff are grounded because the state failed
to defend the Institute’s interests when several years ago it was
deprived of the Scientists’ House, and the Kentron TV company is
currently located in its place. This is not the only case, when
property is taken away from YerPhI and the latter receives no
compensation for that.

It is fair to say that the Government of Armenia removed the issue of
financing by its 1 September 2011 decree, which said that the state
provides support to the `Alikhanyan National Scientific Laboratory
(Yerevan Physics Institute) Foundation’ in line with a 1-year project,
and it is financed by the Armenian state budget’s certain item worth
no less than 665 mln AMD (more than $1.6 mln). In addition,
Chilingaryan says that the Institute received extra financing from the
state, which allowed raising the employees’ salaries by 70% on the
mean. And the payroll is 60-70% of the Institute’s budget and is
proportionally distributed among all divisions and directions of the
research work. Moreover, state financing worth 90 mln AMD is carried
out under a special program for the support of young specialists. The
YerPhI employees receive extra financing under international and
republican grant projects.

In the meantime, Rouben Lazarian casts doubt on the lawfulness of the
appraisal at YerPhI and financing of the divisions, for the Institute
simply has no scientific program approved by the Research Council.
Chilingaryan says that the Institute is still guided by old programs,
but a new strategy is already being worked out. As regards the
circumstance that the Research Council elections were held in March
2011, the scientists explained it with the `permanent organizational
reassignment’ and added that `now everything resumes its natural
course and all our divisions are to hold hearings on the scientific
directions of the Institute by October’.

And still, how will the relations between the Institute and the
Nuclear Medicine Center be developing? It should be noted that by the
aforementioned decree the Government of Armenia instructed the
Armenian minister of education and science to negotiate within a
three-month period on conclusion of a cooperation agreement between
the `Alikhanyan National Scientific Laboratory (Yerevan Physics
Institute) Foundation’, National Competitiveness Foundation of Armenia
and two facilities of the Nuclear Medicine Center, namely Radioisotope
Production Center and Armenian Center of Excellence in Oncology.

Chilingaryan says that the idea of creation of the Nuclear Medicine
Center originated long ago. It was expressed by Senior Fellow at
YerPhI, Academician of the National Academic of Sciences of Armenia
Robert Avagyan. However, the authorities made the decision to create
such a center three years ago when Yuri Oganessian, Professor at the
Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions (FLNR) in Dubna, Academician of
the Russian Academy of Sciences persuaded the Armenian President and
Prime Minister to create such a center. Oganessian is also the
chairman of the International Council of Experts at YerPhI.

He says that the construction of the Nuclear Medicine Center in the
area of the Institute will be launched in 2012, and a Cyclone 18/18
cyclotron accelerator made by IBA Molecular (Belgium) will be
installed at the Center in early 2013. The isotopes to be produced
will be applied on the diagnostic equipment. The Center will also have
a hall for experiments.

Chilingaryan thinks that the cooperation between the Institute and the
Nuclear Medicine Center may mark the beginning of formation of a
so-called technozone or technotown. The relevant operations have
already been launched and YerPhI has acquired powerful laser equipment
for applied scientific research results.

He cherishes hopes that some day YerPhI will be able to work in the
spheres of the fundamental science and applied research as effectively
as the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions (FLNR), where likeminded
persons have been working for 50 years. The Laboratory also focused on
few topics and paid much attention to the applied research.

Now one can only hope that YerPhI will also follow these components of
success. This must certainly contribute to formation of a staff of
likeminded persons, concentration of efforts on scientific activities
and achievement of good results. If independent Armenia gains its
first scientific `success story’ through the example of YerPhI, this
will lead to the revival of the Armenian science.

Syrian opposition trying to gain over Armenian community in Aleppo

Syrian opposition trying to gain over Armenian community in Aleppo

arminfo
Tuesday, August 21, 11:19

The Syrian opposition is trying to gain over the Armenian community
in Aleppo. Syrian Mass Media reports that the Syrian Free Army has
disseminated a statement on Facebook for the Armenians of Aleppo. The
army, particularly, informs Aleppo residents that it moves towards the
districts Al-Azizia, Jamilia and Al-Midan. The Army asks the Christian
communities in Aleppo to support the Free Army fighters and do not
create any obstacles to them, as they are in Aleppo “to liberate
them”.

The government troops, in turn, throw down leaflets from helicopters
in Aleppo urging the fighters to surrender. The leaflets say that the
Syrian authorities promise to save the lives of all the members of
“terrorist gangs” who will cease arms voluntarily and surrender
themselves to the nearby army posts. Moreover, the Syrian authorities
guarantee that the mercenaries from other countries “will be
repatriated to their motherlands and to their families” after relevant
interrogation.

The Syrian Foreign Ministry has warned the Aleppo residents “of the
danger of contacts with terrorists.” The citizens are recommended not
to let terrorists to their homes.

Armenian Smyrna/Izmir Published

Armenian Smyrna/Izmir Published

asbarez
Monday, August 20th, 2012

Cover of Armenian Smyrna
Prof. Richard Hovannisian to Speak About Smyrna at Chapman University

UCLA – Armenian Smyrna/Izmir: The Aegean Communities was released on
August 1 by Mazda Publishers. The volume presents the proceedings of
the eleventh in the UCLA conference series on `Historic Armenian
Cities and Provinces.’ Edited by Professor Richard Hovannisian,
Armenian Smyrna/Izmir includes fourteen chapters and numerous
photographs relating to the Armenian presence in this important Aegean
manufacturing, trading, and intellectual center from the Middle Ages
to the destruction of the city in the Great Fire of 1922. The
intentionally-set fire broke out and consumed the Armenian Quarter
four days after the Turkish Nationalist forces had occupied Smyrna on
September 9, 1922. The publication of the volume coincides with the
90th anniversary of that calamity, which will be observed this year
both by Armenian and the Greek communities worldwide.

Previous volumes in the UCLA series edited by Richard Hovannisian
include 1) Armenian Van/Vaspurakan; 2) Bitlis and Mush; 3) Kharpert
(these three titles now out of print); 4) Karin/Erzerum), 5)
Sebastia/Sivas); 6) Tigranakert/Diarbekir and Urfa; 7) Cilicia;
Pontus and the Black Sea; 9) Constantinople; and 10) Kars and Ani.

Inquiries about ordering copies of Armenian Smyrna/Izmir: The Aegean
Communities, and previous titles in this series may be obtained from
Mazda Publishers or directly from Professor Hovannisian at
[email protected].

Hovannisian at Chapman University on September 5
Hovannisian will lead off the Fall Lecture Series at Chapman
University on Wednesday, September 5, at 7 p.m., with an illustrated
presentation titled `War and Ethnic Cleansing: Smyrna 1922-2012.’ The
program coincides with the 90th anniversary of Great Fire and the end
of its thriving Greek and Armenian communities in Western Asia Minor
in September 1922.

The event is sponsored by Chapman University’s Rodgers Center for
Holocaust Education; Stern Chair in Holocaust Education; and Sala and
Aron Samueli Holocaust Memorial Library, under the Direction of Dr.
Marilyn Harran. The lecture will be held in Beckman Hall, Room 404, of
the Bush Conference Center. Parking is available in the Fred L.
Barrera Structure (P7) on Sycamore Street and the Lastinger Structure
(P4) on Walnut Avenue on the Chapman campus in Orange, California.

Professor Hovannisian has been invited to serve as the first
distinguished Chancellor’s Fellow in the Department of History for the
Fall Semester, during which he will offer a 15-week course for history
majors on the Armenian Genocide and its historiography.