Armenian Foundation Plans to Use Vacant Fire Station for Community A

Patch.com (Encino/Tarzana – California)
Aug 3 2013

Armenian Foundation Plans to Use Vacant Fire Station for Community Activities

In a highly controversial move, the foundation was unanimously granted
a 50-year lease by the Los Angeles City Council for $1 a year.
Neighbors called it a “land grab.”

By Natalie Rivera

The Armenian Cultural Foundation plans to use a vacant Encino fire
station for after-school tutoring, earthquake drills, blood drives and
bicycle rides to promote genocide awareness, according to foundation
spokesman Dr. Raffi Chalian.

In a highly controversial move, the foundation was unanimously granted
a 50-year lease by the Los Angeles City Council for $1 a year.
Neighbors called it a “land grab.”

Chalian told the Encino Neighborhood Council in July that former Fire
Station 83 at 5001 N. Balboa Blvd. will host the many groups the
foundation sponsors, including a dance group and its Armenian Youth
Organization. It will provide community services to the greater Encino
neighborhood and not just its Armenian residents, he said.

The Daily News reported in July that residents were hoping the station
would be used as an additional building for Encino Charter Elementary
School, located next to the station. The newspaper said in May that
there were 600 signatures on a petition to block the lease.

“It’s basically a land grab,” Lisa Becker, a parent and board member
of the Parent Teacher Organization, told the Daily News. “How the city
can justify giving them that property for $1 is beyond me.”

According to the Daily News, the station has been vacant for almost
seven years. The building has also been the target of vandalism and
copper wire theft. The Armenian Cultural Foundation offered to invest
$1 million in repairs, the newspaper reported.

armenian-foundation-plans-to-use-vacant-fire-station-for-community-activities

Hraparak: Russian Security Officials’ Visit To Armenia Entails Huge

HRAPARAK: RUSSIAN SECURITY OFFICIALS’ VISIT TO ARMENIA ENTAILS HUGE BUDGETARY COSTS

11:06 03.08.13

While the rebellious moods against the authorities grow, with more
and more social groups taking to the streets, the government keeps
squandering budgetary sums for arranging visits and receptions, the
paper says, referring to a senior Russian security official’s recent
tour to Armenia

The two-day visit of Nikolay Borduzha, the head of the Russian Security
Councdil, is said to have cost the government 14 million Drams ($
18,594). The paper notes that the Russian official was in Armenia
between from the 23rd until the 25th of July.

Armenian News – Tert.am

M. Davutoglu : La Turquie Et L’Azerbaidjan Sont Deux Pays Freres Dep

M. DAVUTOGLU : LA TURQUIE ET L’AZERBAïDJAN SONT DEUX PAYS FRèRES DEPUIS DES TEMPS IMMéMORIAUX.

AZERBAIDJAN

Ahmet Davutoglu, Ministre turc des Affaires étrangères de
la République de Turquie a effectué une visite officielle en
Azerbaïdjan les 16 et 17 juillet 2013.

Au cours des réunions qui ont eu lieu en tête a tête et avec
la participation des deux délégations, les questions figurant a
l’ordre du jour des relations bilatérales turco-azerbaïdjanaises
et les questions régionales et internationales d’intérêt commun
aux deux pays ont été discutés en profondeur.

S’exprimant lors de la conférence de presse conjointe avec son
homologue azerbaïdjanais, M. Davutoglu a indiqué qu’il existe
un large éventail de domaines de coopération entre la Turquie
et l’Azerbaïdjan, qui sont deux pays frères depuis des temps
immémoriaux. Il a souligné que les deux pays ont réalisé
de nombreux projets allant de l’industrie de la défense aux
relations commerciales, du transport a l’énergie avec succès et ces
réalisations ont été les résultats concrets du pont d’amitié entre
les deux pays. Annoncant qu’un programme d’échange de diplomates sera
bientôt lancé entre les Ministères des Affaires étrangères des
deux pays, M. Davutoglu a déclaré que ce programme prévoit qu’un
certain nombre de diplomates turcs et azerbaïdjanais travaillent au
Ministère des Affaires étrangères de l’autre pays.

Abordant le processus de règlement du conflit du Haut-Karabakh, il
a dit que la Turquie et l’Azerbaïdjan se consultaient en permanence
afin de résoudre cette question et que le soutien turc a la position
légitime de l’Azerbaïdjan se poursuivrait.

M. Davutoglu a déclaré : ” Pour la communauté internationale, il
est temps de faire une évaluation. Le Groupe de Minsk a déployé de
nombreux efforts depuis plus de 20 ans. Nous apprécions ces efforts,
mais ils ne produisent aucun résultat. Tout le monde devrait
s’interroger sur les raisons de l’échec du Groupe de Minsk. Les
coprésidents doivent travailler plus activement. Les membres du Groupe
de Minsk ont aussi des responsabilités a cet égard. La Turquie est
membre du groupe de Minsk, cependant le processus est conduit par les
coprésidents, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d’apporter la contribution
nécessaire. Nous soutiendrons toutes les mesures positives qui seront
prises pour le règlement du conflit. ”

M. Davutoglu a été recu par le Président de la République
S.E.M. Ilham Aliev lors de sa visite. Il a également rencontré les
hommes d’affaires turcs et a écouté leurs problèmes lors d’une
réunion qui s’est tenue a l’Ambassade de Turquie a Bakou.

samedi 3 aoÔt 2013, Stéphane ©armenews.com

Voyager Par Train Sera Gratuit Le 4 Aout

VOYAGER PAR TRAIN SERA GRATUIT LE 4 AOUT

ARMENIE

La compagnie des chemins de fer du Caucase du Sud annonce un evenement
promotionnel avant le jour du cheminot observe le 4 Août. Les passagers
pourront voyager gratuitement ce jour-la via un train a l’interieur
du pays, a rapporte le service de presse de l’entreprise.

Malgre la fete professionnelle, les cheminots de l’Armenie vont
travailler le 4 Août, en general pour assurer le fonctionnement
ininterrompu de l’infrastructure ferroviaire et pour le confort
des passagers.

Cette annee, la compagnie des chemins de fer du Caucase du Sud va
observer le jour du cheminot a Giumry.

Les festivites comprendront une reconstitution historique de
l’atmosphère de Giumry (Alexandrapole) a la fin du 19ème siècle,
l’ouverture du musee du chemin de fer, un concert et la diffusion
d’un long metrage où l’intrigue est construite autour du sujet du
chemin de fer.

samedi 3 août 2013, Stephane ©armenews.com

L’acces Au Territoire Azerbaidjanais Interdit A 335 Etrangers

L’ACCES AU TERRITOIRE AZERBAIDJANAIS INTERDIT A 335 ETRANGERS

DICTATURE

BAKOU, 02 août 2013 (AFP) – L’Azerbaïdjan a rendu publique vendredi
une liste de 335 etrangers, dont des membres de parlements europeens,
des journalistes et des academiciens, auxquels il interdit d’entrer
sur son territoire, en raison des visites qu’ils auraient faites au
Nagorny Karabakh, que se disputent Azerbaïdjanais et Armeniens.

Cette liste diffusee par le ministère des Affaires etrangères de
cette ex-republique sovietique du Caucase aux importantes ressources
petrolières comprend notamment les noms de plusieurs deputes francais,
d’un membre de la Chambre des Lords, la chambre haute du Parlement
britannique, et d’un chanteur d’opera espagnol.

Toutes ces etrangers declares persona non grata ont “viole la loi
sur les frontières d’Etat de l’Azerbaïdjan et ont porte atteinte a la
souverainete nationale et a l’integrite territoriale de l’Azerbaïdjan”,
a explique le ministère dans un communique.

Rattachee a l’Azerbaïdjan a l’epoque sovietique, la region separatiste
du Nagorny Karabakh, en majorite peuplee d’Armeniens, a ete l’enjeu
d’une guerre qui a fait 30.000 morts et des centaines de milliers de
refugies entre 1988 et 1994.

Un cessez-le-feu a ete signe en 1994, mais Bakou et Erevan n’arrivent
pas a se mettre d’accord sur le statut de ce territoire qui reste
une source de tensions dans le Caucase du Sud, une zone strategique
situee entre l’Iran, la Russie et la Turquie.

Le Nagorny Karabakh est toujours reconnu comme faisant partie
de l’Azerbaïdjan par les Nations unies et quiconque se rend
dans cette region, uniquement accessible par la route a partir de
l’Armenie, risque d’etre declare persona non grata par les autorites
azerbaïdjanaises.

samedi 3 août 2013, Ara ©armenews.com

ANKARA: Turkey Condemns Shooting Of Turkish Shepherd At Armenian Bor

TURKEY CONDEMNS SHOOTING OF TURKISH SHEPHERD AT ARMENIAN BORDER

, Turkey
Aug 2 2013

After Ulker crossed the border in order to move the herd of cattle
grazing on the pastures, he was shot dead by Armenian forces.

Turkey’s Foreign Ministry has strongly condemned the death of a
Turkish shepherd at the Armenian border.

“There is no valid explanation for the excessive use of Armenian
force in such an ordinary event,” said the ministry in a statement.

The death of the shepherd, named Mustafa Ulker, following his
violation of the border ‘just because of a harmless reason’ was
strongly condemned by the ministry.

After Ulker crossed the border in order to move the herd of cattle
grazing on the pastures, he was shot dead by Armenian forces.

The necessary diplomatic attempts have been carried out concerning
the matter, the ministry said.

http://www.worldbulletin.net/?aType=haber&ArticleID=114368
www.worldbulletin.net

Who Can Control Israel’s Arms Dealers?

WHO CAN CONTROL ISRAEL’S ARMS DEALERS?

Turkey too resells American weapons and military secrets for a
profit-and that’s a loss to our security.

By PHILIP GIRALDI ~U August 1, 2013

U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman George
M. Bell/Released

Ten years ago, FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds revealed that the
defense ministries of several major recipients of United States
military hardware were being scrutinized because they had been
falsifying end-user certificates, claiming that the equipment was
intended for their own use while at the same time arranging to
sell it to other militaries that were blocked from receiving the
sensitive technology. In May 2006, I described in a Deep Background
column for TAC how the two countries most heavily engaged in the
practice-Israel and Turkey-also benefited from their connections
with leading neoconservatives in Washington. Richard Perle and
Doug Feith in particular benefited financially from their ties to
defense industries in Israel while also serving as richly rewarded
“consultants” for Turkish interests. Feith’s International Advisors
Inc., a registered agent for Turkey in 1989-1994, was paid $600,000 a
year by Turkish sources, while Richard Perle received $48,000 annually
as a consultant. Feith has also long been associated with Northrop
Grumman sales in the Middle East. While at the Pentagon in 1983,
Perle was criticized for endorsing the U.S. Army’s purchase of an
armaments system from an Israeli company that had paid him $50,000
in consulting fees one year before.

Turkey, like Pakistan and Egypt, has a powerful and somewhat autonomous
military establishment. It does not have a law barring its active-duty
military officers from having potentially conflicting outside business
relationships. Indeed, much of its defense industry has traditionally
been run by senior-level retirees, with active-duty officers sometimes
having equity stakes in the various armaments companies. That basically
means that the people making the key decisions on procurement are
often able to deal with former colleagues, enabling both parties
to benefit from the process. It differs from the revolving door at
the Pentagon-where senior officers retire to the boards of defense
contractors and then work to sell arms to former colleagues who
themselves expect to climb on the gravy train someday-in that the
Turkish decision-makers might actually have a direct and immediate
beneficial interest in the result.

Israel operates similarly, though the arms trade is a much larger part
of its total economic activity. The country’s main export is weapons,
ranking it as the sixth largestarms seller in the world by volume
but number one as a percentage of its overall economy. As in Turkey
and the U.S., the business is largely run by retired senior officers.

Unlike Turkey and the U.S., there have been a number of scandals
connected to Israeli weapons development and sales, including the
arrests of Israeli weapons dealers in Latin America and Africa. There
has also been illegal activity relating to the sale of restricted
technology. The Israelis sold the F-16-derived avionics of the Lavi
jet fighter that it was developing with U.S. funding to China, which
then produced its own version, while the electronics of the U.S.

Sidewinder air-to-air missile also went to Beijing, enabling it to
produce a clone called the PL-8. The PL-8 was later sold by China to
Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.

India also benefited from U.S.-developed technology pirated and sold
by Israel when itpurchased the Israeli Phalcon version of the AWACS
plane. In 2010 Tel Aviv sold electronic-warfare systems for the F-16
fighter to Pakistan, nominally an enemy country with which Israel does
not have diplomatic relations. More recently, the Pentagon hasbalked
at giving Israel full maintenance access to the avionics on the F-35
air supremacy fighter planes that Israel will be receiving as part
of its annual aid package because of concern that the electronics
will be stolen.

In Sibel Edmonds’s day, the Turks and Israelis were under investigation
by the FBI because U.S.-made weapons incorporating restricted
technologies were appearing in a number of countries not authorized to
receive them, many of which were located in Central and South Asia as
well as in Latin America. The weapons have also wound up in the hands
of criminal cartels and narcotics traffickers, mingling arms sales
with large-scale fraud, extortion, and drugs. In Turkey, these hidden
relationships and the accompanying networking are frequently referred
to as the “Deep State,” meaning those non-elected powerful figures
who are able to provide cover for transnational illegal activity
and are well-placed enough to prevent any serious inquiry into their
dealings. The always in-demand weapons are frequently the specialty
items that make the rest of the relationship work, and the keys to
acquiring the arms are the end-user certificates. FBI investigators
believed that both the Turks and Israelis were falsely declaring their
intended use of the weapons to enable downstream sales elsewhere at
inflated prices to meet demand from countries and groups that could
not obtain them legally.

While Turkish interests are largely confined to the Near East and
adjacent areas in Europe, the Israelis operate worldwide. Israeli
arms dealers, security services, and consultants span the globe. They
dominate the airport security industry and have also been linked
to training, equipping, and intelligence-gathering for corrupt and
dictatorial regimes in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Security
companies sometimes work as stringers for Israeli intelligence and
may have ties to criminal groups includingburgeoning Russian-Israeli
organized crime in the United States.

The scale of Israeli legal and clandestine arms sales now appears to
far exceed anything that might have been imagined at the time when
Sibel Edmonds was translating documents. Israel’s state controller,
to its credit, has reported that there are major deficiencies in the
supervision of the country’s arms-exporting companies, suggesting
further that there have been abuses as a result. In a familiar
pattern, those who issue the licenses also regulate those whom they
license. The Israeli defense ministry approves arms exporters and
also has oversight authority regarding them through its Defense
Export Controls Agency (DECA). According to the state controller,
DECA has failed to “ensure proper enforcement” of international norms
and regulations on weapons sales.

As in Turkey, this failure to act is largely due to the fact that
the arms trafficking is highly profitable and widely perceived as an
acceptable perk for active and retired military officers. The Israeli
defense ministry has licensed 6,784 arms dealers, a figure that makes
this quite possibly the country’s largest private business sector. The
ministry also disclosed that 6,684 individuals were involved in
“security exports” during 2012, organized in 1,006 companies and
312 independent businesses, with 1,900 marketing permits and 8,716
export licenses issued. Presumably some of the numbers overlap, and
the distinction between companies and independent businesses is by
no means clear, though it does suggest that regulation of a large
and politically sensitive industry has been perfunctory.

An Israeli district court has ordered that the names of some of
the licensees be made public amidst additional revelations from
the Defense Ministry that some companies involved in weapons deals
“do not appear” on the list of registered dealers, suggesting that
there is an underground industry operating alongside, and possibly
in collusion with, the legal one. The Ministry is resisting naming
any of the licensees “to protect the security of the state and its
foreign relations.”

How the ongoing attempt by the Israeli courts and state controller to
bridle the arms-export industry develops will be interesting to follow,
as it pits the civilian rule of law against the most powerful component
in the Israeli state, the country’s military. Patrick Tyler in his
recent book Fortress Israel likens Israel to a new Sparta, where a
dominant state militarism and an increasingly martial culture are the
driving forces behind expansionistic policies and reluctance to make
peace. The army is the largest landowner in Israel and is increasingly
engaged with the private sector and other institutions, including
the universities, where there is a flourishing security-knowledge
industry. For example, Prof. Yitzhak Ben Israel of the Social Sciences
Department of Tel Aviv University works on mathematical models for the
success rates of targeted killings. He uses a substitution formula to
predict how many people have to be killed to result in the collapse
of an organization or political party.

A key component of the militarized state is the drive to increase
the production and export of weapons while also becoming a global
security-services provider. This has led to a certain recklessness
about who is being trained, where the arms wind up, and what sensitive
technology might be exposed in the process. The Pentagon has long been
nervous about the freewheeling Israeli consultants and arms dealers
operating worldwide, particularly as those weapons and expertise
command the highest prices in areas of armed conflict. The United
States, as the primary source and funder for advanced weapons for
Israel, most definitely has a horse in the race as the arms flow
frequently produces political instability, and the technology that
is sold or bartered can endanger U.S. security. But it would be a
non-starter for the Defense Department to go head-to-head with an
indifferent Congress in any attempt to restrict Israel’s access to
U.S. weaponry. So Israel will continue to sell and barter technology
and weapons, legally or illegally, and the question becomes to what
extent the Israeli government itself will put a brake on the unsavory
side of that activity.

Philip Giraldi, a former CIA officer, is executive director of the
Council for the National Interest.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/who-will-control-israels-arms-dealers/

United We Did Not Stand, Divided We Did Fall: Reflections On Raffi’s

UNITED WE DID NOT STAND, DIVIDED WE DID FALL: REFLECTIONS ON RAFFI’S CAMPAIGN

[ Part 2.2: “Attached Text” ]

by Edvin Minassian , Garo B. Ghazarian , and Armen K. Hovannisian

Published: Friday August 02, 2013

Raffi Hovannisian is greeted in Ashtarak. Photolure

This year, the Armenian people turned the corner on an outdated
tradition in which their voices are not heard, their will is not
registered, and their sacrifices are not recognized. For the first
time in modern history, citizens of the Republic of Armenia gave
shape, form, and dimension to their civic and individual rights,
responsibilities, and entitlements.

While unprecedented progress was realized in villages, towns and cities
across Armenia in breaking the cycles of cynicism and indifference,
some have taken the opportunity to characterize the lack of absolute
success as absolute failure. More often than not, the sticks and
stones have come off the keyboard fingers of those who weren’t there,
those who don’t care, and those who won’t dare to make a difference
themselves.

The entire illustrious spectrum of named and unnamed political leaders
and political parties voted with their two left feet long before and
well after Armenia’s February 18, 2013 presidential election.

They decided, for their own defensible and indefensible reasons, to
do little to build national consensus and the bridges across which
a broad oppositional current could gain momentum. Alas, the popular
movement was realized despite the idleness and inactivity of so many
naturals who could have been constructively engaged.

One leader was left standing after the dust of everyone’s disengagement
had settled, and that leader was Raffi Hovannisian. He stood with
hundreds of thousands of his fellow citizens on presidential election
day February 18th, on inauguration day April 9th, and on mayoral
election day May 5th. He stood, stumbled, and got right back up
with them again. He became worthy of the powerful words of President
Theodore Roosevelt:

It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points how the
strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done
them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the
arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives
valiantly, who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, and
spends himself in a worthy cause, who, at best, knows the triumph of
high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least fails
while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those
cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.

Together, Raffi and the Armenian people ushered in this momentous
year which, on their watch, saw hope, dignity, and self-worth being
returned to the Armenian people. He provided the guiding light,
and many chose the right path to freedom. He, along with legions of
other devotees of democracy, justice and independence, helped give
those defining national treasures back to the ordinary Armenian man,
woman, and child, a deliverance which, unlike the near-million votes
cast for him, can never be ignored or uncounted.

To be perfectly clear, the authors of this letter are interested
individuals, interested in the future of Armenia, interested in Raffi
Hovannisian, and interested in truth beyond the puff and punditry
which routinely populate cyberspace. We are members of Raffi’s family
and among his friends and colleagues.

It’s funny how those who are the quickest to try to project fault on
Hovannisian are the ones who did the least to make the current reality
any different than what it ultimately became. In fact, by doing so
very little, they did so very much to make sure that nothing at all
would change.

The naysayers and critics did nothing because most of them were afraid
of their own failure and because some were hoping for Raffi’s.

He, on the other hand, was not afraid of his own failure and was
praying against theirs.

It’s sad how out-of-touch some appear to be with the real-life
miracles and positive changes that played out this year through the
inspiration and leadership of Raffi Hovannisian. Never before in
the history of the republic in its previous election cycles did so
many people really, truly believe in themselves as agents of change,
worthy of the God-given promises of life and liberty.

For Armenia’s first twenty-two years, these sacred promises have
not been well-kept either by those in power or by those who are
liberal with their criticism of others and conservative with their
circumspection about themselves. We are reminded of and feel compelled
to refer to the appropriate lesson from the Scriptures:

And why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye
and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? Matthew 7:3.

It’s wonderful how those who did something good continue to do
something good. Raffi did so then, and does so now.

It’s a shame how those who did nothing continue to do nothing unless,
of course, dithering on the internet is considered something.

United we did not stand, divided we did fall.

Let’s get it right next time.

http://www.reporter.am/go/article/2013-08-02-united-we-did-not-stand-divided-we-did-fall-reflections-on-raffi-s-campaign

Ambassador of Lithuania to Azerbaijan resigns following publication

Ambassador of Lithuania to Azerbaijan resigns following publication of
his phone talk concerning Nagorno-Karabakh
by Emmanuil Lazarian

ARMINFO
Saturday, August 3, 14:34

ArmInfo-Turan. Ambassadors of Lithuania to Azerbaijan and Hungary
Arturas Zurauskas and Renatas Juska have resigned following the
publication of recordings of their phone conversations concerning
Nagorno-Karabakh.

Concerning the resignation of Zurauskas, Lithuanian Foreign Minister
Linas Linkevicius said: “The diplomat is aware of the fact that the
existing situation is preventing him from properly executing his
duties in the incumbent position. I consider it a respectable action.
It is understandable that impeccable moral and ethical standards are
expected from diplomats.”

Recordings of three phone conversations involving Zurauskas, Juska,
Deputy Director of the Lithuanian Foreign Ministry’s Eastern
Neighborhood Policy Department Zenonas Kumetaitis and the Ministry’s
official Gediminas Kasputis were published on youtube.com on July 8
2013.

The conversations concerned the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict and
Nagorno-Karabakh.

More specifically, Juska asked Kumetaitis which of the conflicting
parties he supported.
“Here much depends on which of them is more pro-Russian. In terms of
religion and humanity, the Armenians are closer to Russia – though
they are rotten,” Kumetaitis said.

In his turn, Juska said that he felt sympathy for the Armenians:
“They are Christians. They suffered much from the Stalin regime, which
changed their territory just like it did to ours.”

According to Turan, it is not known who recorded the conversations and
who put them on Youtube. The Lithuanians suspect the Russian special
services, who, in their opinion, are trying to discredit the EU-member
states in the eyes of Armenia and Azerbaijan, now that those countries
are seeking to get closer to Europe.

Azat Gasparyan’s civil funerals to take place at St. John Church

Azat Gasparyan’s civil funerals to take place at St. John Church

17:39, 3 August, 2013

YEREVAN, AUGUST 3, ARMENPRESS. The civil funerals of People’s Artist
of the Republic of Armenia Azat Gasparyan will take place at Yerevan”s
St. John Church at 18:30 on August 4. The Ministry of Culture of the
Republic of Armenia informed “Armenpress” that the fans of the
prominent actor may bid last farewell to Azat Gasparyan in the
National Academic Theatre after Gabriel Sundukyan at 12:00- 14:00 on
August 5. The burial ceremony will take place in the Yerevan City
Pantheon at 14:00.

People’s Artist of the Republic of Armenia Azat Gasparyan passed away
at 16:15 on August 2. “Nairi” Medical Centre informed “Armenpress”
about this. The prominent actor had been in “Nairi” Medical Centre to
continue treatment of spine injury. On August 1 his daughter Nairi
Gasparyan told “Armenpress” that the actor will be out of the hospital
in a couple of days. Azat Gasparyan intended to celebrate his 70th
birthday anniversary on August 13 after getting out of the hospital.

Azat Gasparyan was born on August 1943 in Yerevan. Gasparyan graduated
from the Acting Department of Yerevan Fine Arts and Theatre Institute,
where he studied under the tutelage of Vardan Adjemyan. In 1963-1965
he has worked in Yerevan State Puppet Theatre; in 1971-1979 has acted
in Yerevan Drama Theatre.

Veteran actor Azat Gasparyan has appeared in more than 20 films in
Armenia, and recently has presented some of the best of Armenian
poetry in recitation. Affiliated as an actor with the Gabriel
Sundukian National Academic Theater and frequently appearing on
Armenian television, in 2010 Gasparyan received the title of People’s
Honored Artist from the government of Armenia. He also has received
the title of Honorable Citizen of Yerevan and the William Saroyan
Medal from the Ministry of Diaspora of the Republic of Armenia in
2010.

http://armenpress.am/eng/news/728160/azat-gasparyans-civil-funerals-to-take-place-at-st-john-church.html