Demonstrators "Greeted" MPs: "Slaves, W***Es"

DEMONSTRATORS “GREETED” MPS: “SLAVES, W***ES”

Country – Friday, 20 December 2013, 21:09

Civil activists gathered in front of the parliament which was
discussing the Armenian-Russian gas agreements today. Note that Hovik
Abrahamyan has postponed the voting till Monday because the Republicans
did not show up, and there were not enough button pushers to push
through the ratification. The demonstrators chanted slaves, w***es.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5wPeGc-vq0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKva0x-s2FU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsdlaiIh2BM
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/country/view/31591

Postanjian: Russia May Decide To Sell Shares To Turkey And Azerbaija

POSTANJIAN: RUSSIA MAY DECIDE TO SELL SHARES TO TURKEY AND AZERBAIJAN

During the Armenian parliament’s special session held today on the
initiative of the government, the secretary of ARFD faction Aghvan
Vardanian asked Energy and Natural Resources Armen Movsisian what
awaits Armenia after the agreement on sale of ArmRosGazprom Company’s
shares enters into force.

“Will there be any possibility to conduct negotiations with Iran for
purchasing gas at a lower price?” the ARFD deputy asked.

The minister replied that the agreement does not envisage any
restrictions in the event that a country offers to sign a contract
on more favorable terms. In his words, in this case a new agreement
with another state will be in force.

The secretary of Heritage parliamentary faction Ms. Zaruhi Postanjian
asked the energy minister what will happen if Russia decides to sell
its shares to Turkey and Azerbaijan.

Armen Movsesian said: “They cannot sell shares without our consent”.

Let us remind you that three gas agreements with Russia are being
discussed at the special session of the parliament today.

The parliament is expected to ratify the agreement on the purchase
and sale of shares of ArmRosGazprom CJSC and the terms of its further
activities, the agreement on the price formation order in case of
natural gas delivery to Armenia, and the agreement on cooperation on
the supply of gas, oil products and rough diamonds to Armenia. The
agreements were signed by the Armenian and Russian governments in
Yerevan on December 2.

http://www.aysor.am/en/news/2013/12/20/movsisyan-postanjyan-vardanyan/

Armani Introduces The ‘Socially Relevant Film’

ARMANI INTRODUCES THE ‘SOCIALLY RELEVANT FILM’

By Katie Vanadzin // December 20, 2013

NEW YORK (A.W.)-What makes a film “socially relevant”? Actress and
filmmaker Nora Armani has defined social relevance as a film’s ability
to stimulate, uplift, and enlighten its audience, leaving it with
something to ponder long after the theater lights have come back up.

For Armani, Hollywood’s fixation on blockbuster violence and what
she refers to as its “violent forms of filmmaking, communication,
and marketing” signals the urgent need for a change in the way the
film industry manages itself.

Nora Armani (Photo by Yannis Nivault)

Enter the “Rated SR-Socially Relevant Film Festival New York,” which
was founded by Armani and is currently being organized by Armani
as Founding Artistic Director and a team of New York city-based
collaborators such as Laurence Hoffman as Director of Programming and
Aude Lambert, Director of Partnerships and Marketing. The Rated SR
team shares Armani’s vision of socially relevant films, explaining
they should mark a return to human interest stories and thematic
elements that are social in nature, and make people more aware and
better informed about the world around them.

The festival will take place in New York City, at the Quad Cinema in
Greenwich Village from March 14-20, 2014. The selection will comprise
a 12-film competition for the Grand Prize, other spotlighted special
film screenings with panels of invited guests, red carpet receptions,
and Q&A sessions with invited filmmakers will round up the program.

Film submissions are being accepted in three categories: feature
films, documentaries, and shorts and the final submissions deadline
is Dec. 30.

The Grand Prize, a week-long release for the winning feature film
at the Quad Cinema under the Quadflix Select program, will grant the
filmmaker a run and 100% of the box office. Another documentary prize
offered by Cinema Libre Studio of Los Angeles, is awarded to a winning
documentary for a DVD – VOD release, while other prizes include awards
for films dealing with particular issues. One award given by Armani
herself is in commemoration of her cousin Vanya Exerjian’s memory as
a victim of violence.

A special trophy designed and donated by Michael Aram will be given
to a personality for socially relevant work in film.

The festival has already attracted multiple partners. Dailymotion, the
31st most visited website in the word is an official media partner,
where the festival’s dedicated page has to date 37 000 visits. Other
partners are the School of Visual Arts Social Documentary Department,
The French Embassy in New York Media division, UniFrance Films
International, Cineuropa, The FIAF Alliance Francaise, New York
Foundation for the Arts, and talks are underway with a number of other
media and organizational partners, including the Paris Film Festival
in France.

The Rated SR Film Festival’s organizers are working to secure grants
and corporate and media partners who are being offered excellent
exposure through the already secured Media partnerships. Sponsorships
are still available:

Born in Egypt to Armenian parents, Armani grew up speaking Armenian,
Arabic, English, and French, to which she later added Italian and
Russian. She studied sociology and English at the American University
in Cairo before going on to obtain her master’s in sociology at the
London School of Economics. Her career has included acting, film
production, script writing, film festival organization, film series
curating, and writing about film. All of this experience is now coming
together as Armani unveils the festival, planned for March 2014.

Armani is quick to point out that her aim is not simply to criticize,
but to offer an alternative, and she is not the only one voicing
doubts about the film industry lately. Steven Spielberg garnered
media attention when he was recently quoted in The Hollywood Reporter
as having predicted that there will soon be “an implosion-or a big
meltdown. There’s going to be an implosion where three or four or
maybe even a half-dozen mega-budget movies are going to go crashing
into the ground, and that’s going to change the paradigm.” The
mega-budget movies Spielberg refers to often cost hundreds of millions
of dollars to make, and rarely make those colossal costs back at
the box office. Products of this model of filmmaking, aside from
being economically unsustainable, tend not to appeal to society’s
better nature.

Armani finds particular fault with the portrayal of violence in the
movies. She argues that the prevalence of guns in movies, television,
and the media are contributing to the worryingly high rate of gun
violence in the U.S. in recent decades. She decries the “normalization
and banalization” of violence, whereby violence ceases to shock us.

Reaching the threshold of numbness that, many argue, American
society has already crossed has dangerous implications. The most
frequently cited example of this phenomenon is the 2012 mass shooting
of young schoolchildren at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown,
Conn. Even the massacre of scores of young children seemingly prompted
no meaningful change in U.S. gun control laws-on the contrary, gun
sales in Newtown have surged.

Armani argues that some of the blame for this incomprehensible
indifference can be laid at Hollywood’s door. Society has been
subjected to an “oversaturation” of sensationalized violence, wherein
even the depiction of violence has become violent in its own way. “We
can’t just tell people things anymore,” Armani says, pointing out
that even traditional news sources sensationalize violence in a
way that comes chillingly close to glorification. One need look no
further than the Rolling Stone’s cover photo featuring a glamour
shot of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the surviving Boston bomber, for support
of Armani’s position.

Violence and social relevance are not, of course, mutually exclusive.

Armani cautions that violence, when it must be portrayed, should be
handled responsibly and not be the theme of a work. Violence, if it is
relevant to the work, should be depicted without sensationalism. Many
vices, in addition to violence, are glamorized in films (“Pretty
Woman” is a prime example). Armani worries that cavalier and dishonest
portrayals of violence and crime have a negative influence on society
and its appreciation of the gravity of these problems in reality.

Examples Armani gives of successful socially relevant films include
movies such as “Silver Linings Playbook”, “The Help,” “The Butler,”
and “Dallas Buyers Club”, among many. Socially relevant films,
Armani explains, should manage to be entertaining while also having
excellent production values, such as a film’s sound, lighting, image,
and acting quality.

Many prominent actors have recently spoken out against Hollywood
violence. Jim Carrey criticized the amount of violence portrayed in
the 2013 movie “Kick-Ass 2,” in which he played a lead role; in the
wake of the Sandy Hook shooting, he refused to promote it. According
to a January 2013 article in the Guardian, “Oscar-winning actor Dustin
Hoffman has dismissed the depiction of gun violence in Hollywood as
‘fraudulent’ and claimed that studios actively discriminate against
actors who refuse to carry firearms onscreen.”

Armani says that it is not only actors who find themselves
uncomfortable with Hollywood’s ceaseless, pervasive violence. “Mothers
don’t know what to show their kids anymore,” she explains. Beyond
the violence parents may not want their children exposed to, there
is the additional issue of name-calling and put-downs that have
become a mainstay of movies marketed at children. “The entertainment
industry needs to reduce its visual ‘carbon’ footprint and think of
its legacy,” Armani says-and now more than ever. The 21st century
has so far distinguished itself as the age of screens, as people are
constantly in what she calls “the visual world” and images are so
much more readily accessible than they were in past decades.

Socially relevant films do appear to be catching on. One great example
is the movie “The Butler” that when it opened it topped the charts
with $25 million from 2,933 theaters in its first frame, “wipe[-ing]
the floor with ‘Kick-Ass 2,'” as CNN put it.

This may indeed be the moment for the socially relevant film movement,
as conscientious consumerism is on the rise in many other industries.

People are now much more aware of the consequences of the ways in
which they spend their money, and are paying more attention to the
ways in which their food, clothing, and even diamonds are sourced.

Even large corporations feel pressure to conduct their business in more
socially responsible ways, as corporations who do not can quickly earn
a bad name via the use of internet petitions or other advocacy tools.

In addition to the social forces working in favor of socially relevant
films, there are clear economic incentives as well. “Human interest
stories,” Armani says, do not require the staggering budgets of
blockbuster films. The blockbuster film budget model is increasingly
being seen as unsustainable, and this makes socially relevant films
an attractive alternative.

For Armani, the issue of violence is a personal as well as an academic
one. Ten years ago, her cousin Vanya Exerjian was stabbed to death,
along with her uncle Jack Exerjian, in a religiously motivated hate
crime in Egypt. Beyond the incomprehensible savagery of the crime,
committed in front of numerous bystanders, the killing of her female
cousin raised the broader issue of violence against women. Armani
herself experienced a significant backlash when she spoke out against
the problem of domestic violence in Armenia at an AIWA conference
in London in the early1990’s. The violence, Armani argues, does not
simply come out of thin air. It is fueled by the violent images that
people are continually bombarded with, images that equate violence with
power and glamor. Perhaps, as Armani argues, a return to human-interest
stories will help people to recognize the humanity in one another.

More information about the festival, including how to submit,
volunteer, donate, support, or otherwise be involved, can be found
by visiting

http://www.armenianweekly.com/2013/12/20/armani-introduces-the-socially-relevant-film/
http://www.ratedsrfilms.org
www.ratedsrfilms.org.

China Provides Armenia With New Customs Inspection System

CHINA PROVIDES ARMENIA WITH NEW CUSTOMS INSPECTION SYSTEM

Global Times, China
Dec 20 2013

Xinhua | 2013-12-20 22:56:41
By Agencies

China signed a memorandum with Armenia on Friday to provide the former
Soviet republic with a mobile inspection system to help facilitate
the country’s customs inspection service.

The memo was signed by Chinese Ambassador to Armenia Tian Changchun
and Gagik Khachatrya, head of Armenia’s State Revenue Committee,
at a cargo terminal of the Armenian Customs Service (ACS).

Under the deal, a new “Nuctech” mobile container and vehicle inspection
system, estimated at over 3 million US dollars, will be presented to
ACS as part of China’s aid to Armenia this year.

Khachatrya believed that the new system, with excellent screening
features and radioactivity monitoring, will definitely increase the
efficiency of the ACS work.

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/833316.shtml#.UrSo1D_xvIU

Les Europeens Doivent Enrichir Leur Offre Economique Aux Etats De L’

LES EUROPEENS DOIVENT ENRICHIR LEUR OFFRE ECONOMIQUE AUX ETATS DE L’EUROPE ORIENTALE

Le Monde, France
19 dec 2013

par Vicken Cheterian

Voir des centaines de milliers de personnes descendre dans les rues
de Kiev pourexiger que leur pays rejoigne l’Union europeenne (UE)
devrait booster le moral de Bruxelles. Cela ne doit cependant pas
masquer le fait que la politique de l’UE vis-a-vis de ses voisins
orientaux a subi une serie de revers au cours des derniers mois. Mais
le plus inquietant serait que l’Union ne dispose pas de plan B,
et queses frontières orientales restent floues.

Le sommet de Vilnius des 28 et 29 novembre etait cense couronner un
long processus de negociations visant a instaurer un large partenariat
politique et economique. Pour l’UE, c’etait une alternative a une
coûteuse adhesion a part entière, un moyen non seulement d’etablir
une cooperation mutuelle, mais egalement de stabiliser les pays situes
aux frontières de l’Union.

NOUVELLE PUISSANCE RUSSE

Les resultats ont ete decevants. Ni l’Armenie ni l’Ukraine, deux pays
qui avaient ete prepares a rejoindre l’accord d’association, ne l’ont
signe. Quant a l’Azerbaïdjan et a la Bielorussie, ils ont declare ne
pas souhaiter, meme a long terme, rejoindrel’UE. Seules la Moldavie
et la Georgie, fermement proeuropeennes, ont adhere a l’association.

La cause de cet echec porte un nom : la Russie. L’UE a considere que sa
proposition d’association etait incompatible avec l’union douanière
chapeautee par Moscou. En realite, chaque pays devait choisir de
se tourner soit vers l’Ouest, soit vers l’Est. Or cette logique,
qui fonctionnait depuis l’effondrement de l’Union sovietique, est
aujourd’hui depassee. Avec l’emergence de la nouvelle puissance russe
a l’est, le problème devait inevitablement se poser.

La contre-offensive russe a ete rapide. Moscou a fait en sorte
d’empecherl’Armenie, dependante de la Russie sur le plan energetique,
de signer un accord d’association avec l’UE pour la contraindre de
rejoindre l’union douanière. La Russie a agi de la meme manière pour
devoyer les projets de rapprochement entre l’Ukraine et l’UE.

L’Ukraine est dependante des marches et des importations d’energie
russes. Moscou a entrave les exportations ukrainiennes et a menace de
fermer ses frontières aux produits ukrainiens. Cette politique musclee
a obtenu le resultat souhaite. Le gouvernement de Kiev a fait savoir
qu’il n’etait pas dispose a rejoindrel’accord d’association.

Cet echec ukrainien montre les limites de la puissance de l’UE. Il
ne faut pascroire que proposer l’accès aux marches europeens suffit a
regler les problèmes de pays dont l’economie n’est pas competitive. On
ignore ce que Vladimir Poutine a propose a Viktor Ianoukovitch,
mais il est clair que c’etait plus que ce qu’offrait Bruxelles.

DES PRÊTS QUI ENTRAÎNERAIENT LA HAUSSE DU CHÔMAGE

Le president ukrainien a sollicite une aide de 20 milliards d’euros
pour hisser son economie appauvrie au niveau europeen. Or l’UE ne lui
propose que 610 millions, soulignant que son pays pouvait emprunter
le reste auprès du FMI dans le cadre d’un accord signe en 2010 pour
un pret de 11,5 milliards. Mais ces prets sont assortis de conditions
qui entraîneraient une forte hausse du chômage et feraientperdre a M.

Ianoukovitch l’election presidentielle de 2015.

La question essentielle est : quelle sera la place de la Russie
dans la futurearchitecture politique europeenne ? Depuis vingt ans,
l’expansion de l’UE a l’est s’est effectuee en depit de Moscou et
sur son ancienne zone d’influence. La Russie traversait une periode
troublee et n’etait pas en mesure de stopper cette expansion ni celle
de l’OTAN. Mais cette epoque est revolue depuis la guerre de 2008
entre la Russie et la Georgie.

Par ailleurs, la politique russe de l’UE manque d’imagination, alors
qu’elle en aurait desesperement besoin. La competition russo-europeenne
autour des territoires de l’Europe orientale et du Caucase est une
lutte asymetrique.

L’Europe y apparaît comme une grosse et lourde machine dotee d’un
cadre institutionnel et d’un processus de decision complexes. Elle
fait face a une Russie dans laquelle le pouvoir est concentre entre
les mains de Vladimir Poutine, un expert en man~uvres rapides et
contre-attaques inopinees.

Il est possible qu’aujourd’hui l’UE ne dispose que d’une offre limitee
a l’egard des pays d’Europe orientale qui lui restent exterieurs,
qu’il s’agisse de l’Ukraine ou du Caucase. L’Europe devrait egalement
apprendre a distinguer la politique exterieure de l’Ukraine de ses
conflits internes.

MAN~LUVRER EN PERMANENCE ENTRE DEUX BLOCS

La mobilisation de rue en cours a Kiev pourrait renverser le president
Ianoukovitch, mais cela ne reglera pas tout. Cela s’est deja produit
une fois. Celui, quel qu’il soit, qui accedera au pouvoir a Kiev
devra man~uvrer en permanence entre les deux blocs (UE et Russie)
afin de tirer le meilleur parti possible de leur rivalite.

Cette concurrence entre les deux camps pourrait destabiliser un
peu plus les pays les plus fragiles. Tout comme l’orientation vers
l’Ouest de la Georgie lui a coûte l’Abkhazie et l’Ossetie du Sud,
le choix de l’Ukraine de rejoindre l’un ou l’autre camp comporte des
risques : la fracture culturelle entre la partie occidentale du pays,
qui parle ukrainien, et les regions russophones de l’Est et du Sud
se cristallise de plus en plus autour des identites politiques.

Ni la ” revolution orange ” de 2004 ni la mobilisation proeuropeenne
actuelle n’ont reussi a combler ce fosse. L’economie ukrainienne
se porte mal et, au lieu d’un choix exclusif, elle a besoin pour sa
stabilite a la fois des marches europeen et russe. L’Ukraine a besoin
d’une entente entre Bruxelles et Moscou qui ouvre des possibilites
de cooperation, et non d’accords exclusifs. Bruxelles est-elle prete
aproposer un tel compromis a Kiev ?

Traduit de l’anglais par Gilles Berton

Vicken Cheterian (Chercheur independant a Genève)

Vicken Cheterian est l’auteur de ” From Perestroika to Rainbow
Revolutions : Reform and Revolution after Socialism “,

London : Hurst, 250 p. (non traduit)

http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2013/12/19/les-europeens-doivent-enrichir-leur-offre-economique-aux-etats-de-l-europe-orientale_4336614_3232.html

Stepan Kerkyasharian Retires

STEPAN KERKYASHARIAN RETIRES

Neos Kosmos (The Hellenic Perspective) , Australia
Dec 19 2013

Ethnic, religious and community leaders gathered at the Le Montage
Function Centre in Lilyfield in Sydney to celebrate the achievements
of Dr Stepan Kerkyasharian AO

19 Dec 2013

Ethnic, religious and community leaders gathered at the Le Montage
Function Centre in Lilyfield in Sydney a few days ago to celebrate the
achievements of Dr Stepan Kerkyasharian AO, the retiring Chairperson
of the NSW Community Relations Commission. The special guests on the
evening were the NSW Minister for Citizenship and Communities Victor
Dominello and Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells, representing the
Prime Minister Tony Abbott.

Stepan Kerkasharian, of Armenian descent, was born in Cyprus and
arrived in Australia in 1967 via England. His contribution to
multiculturalism in this country span over a period of more than
30 years.

He was associated with the Armenian community firstly in Melbourne
where he taught in their community language school. Then in radio
through SBS where he was a key player in helping to establish SBS
television.

In 1989 he was appointed to the Chair of the Ethnic Affairs Commission
which evolved into the Community Relations Commission (CRC). Stepan
Kerkasharian served seven state premiers and numerous ministers over
the years.

The Community Relations Commission under his leadership took a
leading and proactive role to ensure that racism has no place in
today’s multicultural society in NSW and in Australia. Importantly,
he helped enshrine in law the principles of multiculturalism. He,
along with his fellow commissioners, assisted communities with the
grants program administered through the CRC. He also established
an inter-faith dialogue amongst the various religious organisations
in NSW.

http://neoskosmos.com/news/en/Stepan-kerkyasharian-retires

Turkey And Armenia: What’s Next?

TURKEY AND ARMENIA: WHAT’S NEXT?

Brookings Institution
Dec 18 2013

By: Omer TaÅ~_pınar

More…

The issue of Armenia enters the Turkish foreign policy agenda almost
exclusively in the context of Western attempts at legislating genocide
resolutions. The result is often a reactive nationalist defense.

In less than two years, by 2015, Turkey will find itself in a similar
dilemma. Once again, it will be external dynamics that will drive the
domestic and foreign policy debate, and quite predictably Turkey will
react with anger and resentment to Western attempts at commemorating
the centennial of the Armenian genocide. In order to avoid such an
ordeal, Ankara needs to think about Armenian-Turkish relations now,
before Western pressure builds up. The fact that Foreign Minister
Ahmet Davutoglu visited Yerevan last week is a step in the right
direction and needs to be congratulated. Instead of panicking shortly
before 2015, the Turkish government needs to pursue a multidimensional
strategy, starting now. The first dimension of the strategy should
be the opening of the border and the establishment of diplomatic
relations between the two countries.

As it is well known, shortly after the signature of the two protocols
aiming at achieving these two goals in 2009, Ankara decided to
index the ratifications of the protocols to the resolution of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Linking the normalization of relations
to a “frozen conflict” had the impact of freezing the protocols as
well. It also showed that Turkey had no empathy for the Armenian
political leadership, which took a lot of heat from the diaspora for
dropping genocide recognition as a precondition for the normalization
of relations with Ankara.

In retrospect, the Turkish decision to establish a precondition
for normalization with Armenia was shortsighted because it
practically gave Azerbaijan de facto veto power over Turkish-Armenian
normalization. Instead, what Turkey should have done was to establish
diplomatic and economic relations with Armenia with the hope that
such a policy of engagement would in time create positive momentum
and leverage in favor of a resolution in Nagorno-Karabakh. It remains
unclear whether a breakthrough in this frozen conflict can be achieved
in the absence of Turkey gaining more leverage in relations with
Armenia. It looks like sequencing is the main problem here. The
Turkish side is reportedly ready to open the border, establish
diplomatic relations and even provide financial support to Armenia
in return for an Armenian withdrawal from two of the seven occupied
regions surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh. This proposal looks like the
same one Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan made a few years ago
to his Armenian counterpart at the time, Robert Kocharyan. Kocharyan
had refused the Turkish demand on the grounds that there should be no
linkage between Nagorno-Karabakh and normalization with Turkey. It is
hard to see why today the Armenian reaction to a very similar Turkish
proposal would be any different.

Therefore, this most recent Turkish attempt at rapprochement with
Armenia is also likely to fail in the absence of a unilateral Turkish
gesture such as the opening of the border without preconditions. On
the other hand, since Turkey is always in some kind of election season,
it is almost impossible to see the Justice and Development Party (AKP)
invest serious political capital in rapprochement by taking such
a courageous step. Under such circumstances, it is not surprising
that the Armenian media saw Davutoglu’s Yerevan visit as nothing
more than a public relations campaign. If Turkey is really serious
about normalizing relations with Armenia, it will have to take some
risks in relations with Azerbaijan. The key will be to convince Baku
that only the normalization of Turkish-Armenian relations will create
positive momentum in solving the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute.

Turkey needs to open the border first and expect its diplomatic and
economic engagement policy with Armenia to pay off in the long run.

The alternative is to continue with the current policy. The current
Turkish policy has produced no change in Nagorno-Karabakh in the last
20 years. It is time to think more creatively.

http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2013/12/15-turkey-armenia-next-taspinar

European Court Decision On Genocide Denial Strongly Condemned

EUROPEAN COURT DECISION ON GENOCIDE DENIAL STRONGLY CONDEMNED

Wednesday, December 18th, 2013

A memorial to the Armenian Genocide in a square in Decines, France
(Photo: Reuters)

PARIS-The Armenian National Committee office in France and the European
Armenian Federation for Justice and Democracy (ANC of Europe) issued
a joint statement Tuesday strongly condemning the Dec. 17 ruling
of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) that the denial of the
Armenian genocide is not a criminal offense. According to the Court,
the 2007 decision of the Lausanne Police Court against the head of
Turkish Workers’ Party Dogu Perincek is a violation of the right to
freedom of expression. (Read the Court’s press release here.)

The statement considered the ruling to be direct assistance to the
wave of denial orchestrated by official Ankara and Baku throughout
Europe. “Once again hiding behind the right to free speech, and
following the example of the French Constitutional Council, the
European Court undermines with this infamous decision the right to
dignity of the victims and descendants of the Armenian genocide,”
read the statement.

The statement further noted that the decision will “undoubtedly
strengthen extremist movements” and undermine the voices calling for
justice from within Turkey.

“Moreover, by declaring that ‘it would be very difficult to identify
a general consensus’ on the Armenian genocide, the Court aligns
itself with Perincek’s statement that the Armenian genocide is an
‘international lie.’ The Court’s approach that ‘clearly distinguished
the present case from those concerning the negation of the crimes of
the Holocaust’ is also deplorable. How can such a distinction be made
by the highest human rights court in Europe?”

In conclusion, the statement noted that the ANC of France, in
coordination with the EAFJD Brussels office, will fight against this
unacceptable decision. “Switzerland has three months to appeal this
verdict. We have requested a meeting with the Swiss Ambassador in
Paris, to present our expectations from the Swiss authorities.

Coordinated efforts will be made in other countries as well, through
local ANCs and regional offices, as well as through official Yerevan,
as we form a united front against this decision,” concluded the
statement.

http://asbarez.com/117552/european-court-decision-on-genocide-denial-strongly-condemned/

Yegparian: ReCONciliation

YEGPARIAN: RECONCILIATION

By Garen Yegparian // December 18, 2013 in Garen Yegparian

Reading the phrase “hell-bent on Armenian-Turkish reconciliation” at
the end of Harut Sassounian’s most recent column triggered a profound
revulsion coupled with a realization.

Harut did nothing wrong. He was just referring to the losers who have
raised the “reconciliation” flag and paraded it around in Armenian
settings every chance they get. This plays right into Turks hands.

How?

“Reconciliation” is such a “good thing,” right? Who could be against
something that Nelson Mandela (cited in Hrant Apovian’s “What Will
the Armenian Genocide Centennial Accomplish?”) defined as “working
together to correct the legacy of past injustice” (note this is from
the guy who practically invented the whole notion of socio-political
reconciliation).

But that takes two willing, non-duplicitous, equitably motivated,
sides. Not one sincere side and another side cynically abusing the
opportunity to get out of its obligations to humanity and its victims.

I realized that much of the push is coming from U.S. sources,
with the Turks availing themselves of the escape route provided by
“reCONciliation.” And that’s what it is in our case-a con, a scam, a
flimflam, a deceit, a ruse, etc., ad nauseam. Those whose experience
is defined by life in the Americas, especially the U.S., are used to
thinking in terms of “we must all get along, we’re all different,
but we’re in this together,” because all but the Native Americans
are recent arrivals to the those continents.

In the Armenian case, you have a native population, essentially
totally extirpated from its home, and the murderous invader wanting
to escape responsibility. That’s reCONciliation as conceived by the
Turkish government.

This approach is evident in Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu’s
recent characterization of the deportation portion of the genocide as
“inhumane,” and attributing it to the Ottoman Empire. He’s doing two
things. He’s playing “decent” by recognizing the fundamentally wrong
nature of the deportations. At the same time, he’s not recognizing
that the deportation happened in the context of committing genocide.

Thus, he strengthens Turkey’s position in arguing that reCONciliation
should happen without recognition of the genocide, reparations,
or restoration of Wilsonian Armenia to its rightful owners.

In this, he’s supported by sectors of society in Turkey. One Aybars
Gorgulu, program officer at the Foreign Policy Program of the Turkish
Economic and Social Studies Foundation (TESEV), a Turkish think-tank,
asserts, “Armenian diaspora needs to see the change in Turks’ approach
to 1915.”

Great, so, we see the change, then what? If the terminus of the
Armeno-Turkish relationship is a journey of a million miles, then
we’ve advanced maybe 10 miles. That’s better than the one mile of
just a decade ago, but it is still insignificant in the overall scheme
of things.

By the way, TESEV, on its own website reports it “organized a
study trip in the Armenian capital Yerevan on 4-6 June, 2012…[for]
academics, students, media, and civil society representatives who have
been actively involved in…discussing Turkish-Armenian relations
since 2010 but never been to Armenia before.” Without having the
benefit of following, personally, the participants’ activities in
Yerevan, my instinctive reaction is that this just provided grist
for the reCONciliation mill.

The fact that we have made some progress is a testament to the value of
the pressure we have applied to Turkey. Much more is needed. This does
not mean, and I say this emphatically, that we should not engage our
adversaries. Quite the contrary, we should speak with them, and openly,
this way neither side can accuse the other of misrepresenting the
content of any contacts. Interestingly, my article from two weeks ago,
“Turks Must Be Smoking Their Own Poppies” has inadvertently followed
this two-step approach: The “pressure” came from pointing out the flaws
in a Turkish academician’s article. The “engage” part arose with that
author wanting to meet when she’s in the Los Angeles area next.

Engagement is not of the sort that Davutoglu revealed during his
trip to Yerevan-that he had been meeting with Armenians on the sly
wherever he traveled. That’s just a tactic to enable reCONciliation.

Please, from now on, whenever we hear “reCONciliation” being brandished
as the ultimate good and goal in relations with our denialist neighbor,
let’s recognize it for the vacuous blather it represents at this
point in our million-mile journey.

http://www.armenianweekly.com/2013/12/18/yegparian-reconciliation/

Remember the Poghosyan Family?

PRESS RELEASE
THE PAROS FOUNDATION
918 Parker Street, Suite A14
Berkeley, CA 94710
Contact: Peter Abajian
Email: [email protected]
Web:
Tel: US 310-400-9061
Armenia: (093) 99-80-99 From US dial 011-374-93-99-80-99

December, 2013

Gyumri, Armenia- Just prior to Christmas, 2012 the Poghosyan family’s
makeshift home-commonly known as a “domik” caught fire and
burnt. Homeless and struggling from their loss, the family and their
six children moved into yet another domik. The Paros Foundation,
through its “Purchase a Home” project, part of its 100 for 100
Projects for Prosperity, launched an effort to solve the Poghosyan
family’s housing needs. In early December 2013, the family was
presented with keys to their new apartment thanks to the generous
sponsorship of California donors, who simply want to be referred to as
Nejde & Lilit.

“We first met the Poghosyan family during the implementation of our
Gyumri Winter Rescue project
[]
in January 2013.” Said Peter Abajian, Executive Director of The Paros
Foundation. “It was hard to imagine what this family had gone through,
and we quickly committed to figuring out what we could do to help.”

Learning of the plight of the Poghosyan family and wanting to help,
Nejde & Lilit committed to the necessary funds and the search for a
new apartment for the Poghosyan family began. Within several weeks,
the transaction was complete and the family moved into their new
apartment.

To view a short video of the Poghosyan Family’s story, please visit
[].

Throughout the process, our Gyumri Partner, Vahan Tumasyan, Executive
Director of The Shirak Center, worked closely with our Armenia based
Staff and spearheaded the effort to identify and help relocate the
family.

The Paros Foundation underwrote all administrative expenses to allow
100% of sponsor contributions to be allocated towards the purchase the
Poghosyan family’s home.

Today, almost 4,000 families in Gyumri, Armenia’s second largest city,
still live in these unsafe, and extreme conditions, taking shelter in
dilapidated buildings and in the rusted remains of overseas shipping
containers. Some, left homeless following the 1988 Spitak Earthquake,
and other, simple victims of extreme poverty are left with little
alternative than to live in these inhuman conditions.

The Paros Foundation and the Poghosyan express our deepest
appreciation to Nejde & Lilit for making this miracle happen.

The Paros Foundation remains committed to helping alleviate this human
suffering through its ” Purchase a Home
[]”
project. To sponsor this or another Paros 100 for 100 project, please
visit

Please consider sponsoring a project in memory of the 100th
anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, through the Paros Foundation’s
100 for 100 Projects for Prosperity, by visiting
The Paros Foundation underwrites all
administrative expenses allowing all sponsor contributions to be spent
100% on the project. Donations to The Paros Foundation, a 501(c) 3
non-profit organization, are tax-deductible to the fullest extent
allowed by law. When in Armenia, The Paros Foundation’s staff will
arrange a visit to and tour of your project.

Donations can be made online at
[] via credit card or check made
payable to: The Paros Foundation, and mailed to: 918 Parker Street,
Suite A14, Berkeley, CA 94710. To get involved and help make a
difference, please donate now!

About The Paros Foundation []

Officially launched in 2006, The Paros Foundation has identified and
partnered with six organizations in Armenia (The Paros Chamber Choir (
) [], Unison NGO (
[]), Vanadzor Arts School (
[]), Manana Youth Center (
[]), Vanadzor Museum of
Fine Art ( []) and the Ghoghanj
Children’s Center (
[]).) These organizations serve as
leaders in their respective fields of children, people with
disabilities and the arts. Foundation support comes in the form of
organizational operating funds, office space and organizational
resources and mentoring. The mission is to help these modest size
projects manage their growth and attract more financial, human, and
physical resources to their respective causes.

To honor the centennial of the Armenian Genocide, The Paros Foundation
launched The Paros 100 for 100 Projects for Prosperity initiative to
benefit Armenia and her people. 100 pre-screened, projects in the
areas of development, education, cultural and humanitarian will be
implemented to help make Armenia stronger and improve the lives of her
people. The Paros Foundation underwrote all administrative expenses
allowing 100% of donor contributions to go directly to the purchase of
these pianos. Donations to The Paros Foundation, a 501(c)3
organization are tax-deductible to the fullest extent allowed by law.

To sponsor a project of the Paros Foundation’s 100 for 100 Projects
for Prosperity, please visit
[].

http://www.parosfoundation.org/
http://www.paros-foundation.org/paros100/projects/gyumri-winter-operation/project.html
http://www.parosfoundation.org/purchaseahomeII
http://www.paros-foundation.org/paros100/projects/purchase-a-home-II/project.html
http://www.parosfoundation.org/
http://www.parosfoundation.org/
http://www.paros.am/
http://www.unison.am/
http://www.vanadzormusic.org/
http://www.mananayouth.org/
http://www.vanart.org/
http://www.childrenscenter.am/
http://www.parosfoundation.org/
www.parosfoundation.org.
www.parosfoundation.org.
www.parosfoundation.org
www.paros.am
www.unison.am
www.vanadzormusic.org
www.mananayouth.org
www.vanart.org
www.childrenscenter.am
www.parosfoundation.org