Australian parliamentarians condemn visit of Armenian Genocide denie

Australian parliamentarians condemn visit of Armenian Genocide denier
Justin McCarthy

15:06, 21 December, 2013

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 21, ARMENPRESS. John Alexander, the Liberal Member
for Bennelong, and Michelle Rowland, the Labor Member for Greenway,
have both risen in Australia’s Federal Parliament to speak against
visiting Armenian Genocide denier, Professor Justin McCarthy.

The Armenian National Committee of Australia informed `Armenpress’
that McCarthy, who is a well funded denier of the Armenian Genocide,
earlier this week had two planned events in Sydney and Melbourne
cancelled on the grounds of his unwelcome denialist views.

McCarthy spoke in a room at Parliament House on Thursday, at an event
attended by reportedly only “two or three politicians” after the
Armenian National Committee of Australia (ANC Australia) wrote to all
Members of Parliament and Senators about McCarthy’s denialist
views. Among the attending politicians were Laurie Ferguson and Mehmet
Tillem, who had helped organise the event.

While this event took place, on the same day, MPs Alexander and
Rowland made addresses in the national Parliament, unequivocally
confirming the historical reality of the Armenian Genocide to a far
greater audience of politicians, media and members of the public.

Alexander said: “… revisionist Justin McCarthy has used
parliamentary facilities to promote his well-documented views
questioning the systematic slaughter of Armenians, Assyrians and
Pontian Greeks from 1915 to 1923.”

“The International Association of Genocide Scholars has discredited
McCarthy’s work as selective and grossly distorting history.”

“ANZAC soldiers verify the Genocide as an irrefutable historical fact
through their eyewitness accounts.”

“Denial of this Genocide is an attack on those who perished, those who
survived, and their descendants.”

He added: “This institution should never again be used to express
doubt over the scope of suffering experienced by the victims of a
historical atrocity nor to justify these actions as merely part of a
civil war.”

Rowland, adding her voice, said: “I can also understand the heightened
frustration that many Australian-Armenians feel on this matter because
of the venue at which this event is scheduled to take place.”

“My views on this are well known. I have joined in the past with
members of parliament and community leaders from all sides of the
political spectrum including the members for Berowra and Bennelong,
and the New South Wales Liberal Minister Gladys Berejiklian, to
recognise the Armenian genocide…”

“Australian POWs recorded the marches, the massacres and the complete
destruction of Armenian churches, villages and city quarters. ANZAC
servicemen also rescued survivors across the Middle East.”

“Today I acknowledge the tragic events of 1915 and affirm my
commitment to never forget what happened to the Armenian people who
were effectively eliminated from the homeland they had occupied for
nearly 3,000 years.”

She added: “This week I noted a humanitarian plea to assist people in
the Philippines who were the victims of natural disaster, and I want
to end this speech by noting that Australia’s first major
international humanitarian relief effort was in fact to help Armenian
orphans from the genocide.”

ANC Australia extended their appreciation to Alexander and Rowland for
bringing to light that Armenian Genocide denial, like Holocaust
denial, is unacceptable.

Executive Director Vache Kahramanian said: “Mr Alexander and Ms
Rowland are champions of human rights and champions of just
recognition of the Armenian Genocide. We once again appreciate their
support.”

Meanwhile, to ensure the support against Armenian Genocide denialism
is truly bi-partisan, Greens spokesman on multiculturalism Richard Di
Natale told the Sydney Morning Herald that the event should not have
been held in Parliament.

`Justin McCarthy is a rallying point for those who deny the Armenian
genocide,’ the Senator said.

`The Australian Parliament should not be providing Professor McCarthy
with a platform because that just lends legitimacy those views.” `To
deny the fact that genocide occurred is to disrespect those people who
lost their lives and to cause further pain for those who lost loved
ones.’

During McCarthy’s visit, the cancellations of certain events followed
mass media coverage by the ABC, Fairfax, News Limited, Macquarie and
SBS.

The Executive Council of Australian Jewry also released a powerful
statement expressing their deep concerns of McCarthy’s visit and
denialist views.

http://armenpress.am/eng/news/744596/australian-parliamentarians-condemn-visit-of-armenian-genocide-denier-justin-mccarthy.html

Construction of Vardenis-Martakert highway to start in January 2014

Construction of Vardenis-Martakert highway to start in January 2014

14:51 21.12.2013

Hayastan All-Armenian Fund

Hayastan-All Armenian Fund has signed contracts for procurement of
Vardenis-Martakert road construction with firms having won the tender
carried out on December 9 and 10.

According to the contracts, firms undertaking the construction
projects, will start the road earthwork and engineering works /first
stage/ in January 2014.

Contracts specify the same time period for implementation of the works
on the road with a total length of about 116km, Press Service of the
Hayastan Fund reports.

The Vardenis-Martakert Highway will be of key economic and
humanitarian importance. By functioning as a direct road link, the
highway will become a second lifeline between northern Armenia and
northern Artsakh, significantly cutting down travel times, boosting
the economies of scores of Artsakh communities along its path,
stimulating inter-community ties, and vastly improving geographic
access for implementing local development initiatives.

Currently the only land-travel link between Artsakh and Armenia is the
Berdzor community, through which passes the Goris-Stepanakert Highway.

The Vardenis-Martakert Highway will bring economic benefits to
communities located within up to 20 kilometers on either side of the
route.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2013/12/21/construction-of-vardenis-martakert-highway-to-start-in-january-2014/

Turkey’s river dam project unilateral decision – Armenian PM

Turkey’s river dam project unilateral decision – Armenian PM

15:16 – 21.12.13

Armenia’s prime minister has described Turkey’s $20 billion worth
river dam construction project as a unilateral decision threatening
Armenia’s water resources.

Tigran Sargsyan addressed the problem at the presentation of
Karabakhfacts.com, the first Armenian online yearbook of comparative
and international law. He said the Turkish project may negatively
affect the water reserves in the Ararat valley.

`That country’s government has made a unilateral decision;
particularly, it has allocated 20 billion Dollars for the construction
of dams on rivers highly influencing the water reserves in the Ararat
valley. Specialists’ estimates suggest that we will have serious
problems with the irrigation networks in the Ararat valley years
later,’ said the premier.

Sargsyan said Armenia has real legal mechanisms allowing it to protect
its national interests. He particularly stressed the importance of
using the international treaties, conventions and other instruments
that would help back the country’s rights at international tribunals.
In that context, he referred also to the treaties concluded back in
the Soviet period.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2013/12/21/tigran-sargsyan6/

Zoryan Institute at a Glance

PRESS RELEASE
ZORYAN INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC.
Suite 310
Toronto, ON, Canada M3B 3H9
CONTACT: Patil Halajian
Tel: 416-250-9807
Fax: 416-512-1736
E-mail: [email protected]

A message from the Zoryan Institute

The Zoryan Institute

Dear Friends of Zoryan,

We have been asked by many of our friends and supporters worldwide to share
our activities on YouTube, so they can have a greater feeling of
participation. In line with our year-end tradition of keeping our supporters
informed, we have chosen this year to transmit some of the highlights of
these activities to our friends via video.

Please click on the pictures or press play to play videos of each event, and
your feedback would be much appreciated.

We wish to take this opportunity to thank you for all the financial and
moral support of our donors and Friends like yourself, without which we
would not be able to serve the Institute’s mission. Only with your continued
help can we meet these goals.

Happy holidays from all of us at Zoryan!

The Canadian Museum for Human Rights, represented by Mr. Stuart Murray,
President and CEO, and the Armenian Genocide Museum Institute of the
National Academy of Sciences, represented by Dr. Hayk Demoyan, Director,
signed a Memorandum of Understanding on November 7, 2013 that will
facilitate collaboration for the promotion of education and awareness of
human rights and genocide through joint projects. The collaboration was
initiated and continues to be facilitated by the Zoryan Institute.

Play video

Representative of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights, Dr. Clint Curle,
Head of Stakeholder Relations, describes the significance of the Zoryan
Institute for Canadians during a meeting with the Minister of Diaspora of
the Republic of Armenia in March 2013.

Play video

The treatment of the Jewish community in Turkey since 1950. was not any
different from all the non-Muslim minorities-Armenians, Greeks and Jews-they
all have faced similar challenges in their relationship with the Turkish
state and society, writes noted scholar Rifat Bali of Turkey. They all had
to deal with issues of language, religion, culture and identity in a
society that demands total conformity, but they responded to the challenges
in different ways. Bali describes how the Jewish community, in particular,
attempted to become “model citizens of the state,” in response to this
challenge.

Play video

pg

The first Hollywood film on the Armenian Genocide,”Ravished Armenia,” was
released in 1919, while the effects of the Genocide were still taking place.
It was shown in several countries, captured the public’s imagination, and
was very popular. Aurora Mardiganian, a 17-year-old genocide survivor,
portrayed herself in the film as the lead character, reliving the trauma of
the horrors she had personally experienced. Henry Morgenthau, US Ambassador
to the Ottoman Empire during the time of the genocide, also portrayed
himself. In this video, internationally renowned filmmaker Atom Egoyan and
Director of the Armenian Genocide Museum Institute Hayk Demoyan discuss the
significance of the film and the life of Aurora Mardiganian.

Play video

The President of the Republic of Armenia’s Prize was given to the Zoryan
Institute in April 2013. the prize was awarded to the Institute for its
“significant work in research on the Armenian Genocide, publishing
activities, and notable contribution to the preparation of young scholars.”
President Serzh Sargsyan described the Zoryan Institute as one of the “key
institutions” in the Diaspora.

Play video (inArmenian)

https://gallery.mailchimp.com/953bb838fd033f9888c55b269/images/Zoyan_logo3a9ba78abfc1acba69bb451af.png
https://gallery.mailchimp.com/953bb838fd033f9888c55b269/images/sign1ddb15.jpg
https://gallery.mailchimp.com/953bb838fd033f9888c55b269/images/IMG_0682.1a7c202.jpg
https://gallery.mailchimp.com/953bb838fd033f9888c55b269/images/balic7eda378d419.png
https://gallery.mailchimp.com/953bb838fd033f9888c55b269/images/mardiganian.j
https://gallery.mailchimp.com/953bb838fd033f9888c55b269/images/3100_b.jpg
www.zoryaninstitute.org

Demonstrators "Greeted" MPs: "Slaves, W***Es"

DEMONSTRATORS “GREETED” MPS: “SLAVES, W***ES”

Country – Friday, 20 December 2013, 21:09

Civil activists gathered in front of the parliament which was
discussing the Armenian-Russian gas agreements today. Note that Hovik
Abrahamyan has postponed the voting till Monday because the Republicans
did not show up, and there were not enough button pushers to push
through the ratification. The demonstrators chanted slaves, w***es.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5wPeGc-vq0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKva0x-s2FU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsdlaiIh2BM
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/country/view/31591

Postanjian: Russia May Decide To Sell Shares To Turkey And Azerbaija

POSTANJIAN: RUSSIA MAY DECIDE TO SELL SHARES TO TURKEY AND AZERBAIJAN

During the Armenian parliament’s special session held today on the
initiative of the government, the secretary of ARFD faction Aghvan
Vardanian asked Energy and Natural Resources Armen Movsisian what
awaits Armenia after the agreement on sale of ArmRosGazprom Company’s
shares enters into force.

“Will there be any possibility to conduct negotiations with Iran for
purchasing gas at a lower price?” the ARFD deputy asked.

The minister replied that the agreement does not envisage any
restrictions in the event that a country offers to sign a contract
on more favorable terms. In his words, in this case a new agreement
with another state will be in force.

The secretary of Heritage parliamentary faction Ms. Zaruhi Postanjian
asked the energy minister what will happen if Russia decides to sell
its shares to Turkey and Azerbaijan.

Armen Movsesian said: “They cannot sell shares without our consent”.

Let us remind you that three gas agreements with Russia are being
discussed at the special session of the parliament today.

The parliament is expected to ratify the agreement on the purchase
and sale of shares of ArmRosGazprom CJSC and the terms of its further
activities, the agreement on the price formation order in case of
natural gas delivery to Armenia, and the agreement on cooperation on
the supply of gas, oil products and rough diamonds to Armenia. The
agreements were signed by the Armenian and Russian governments in
Yerevan on December 2.

http://www.aysor.am/en/news/2013/12/20/movsisyan-postanjyan-vardanyan/

Armani Introduces The ‘Socially Relevant Film’

ARMANI INTRODUCES THE ‘SOCIALLY RELEVANT FILM’

By Katie Vanadzin // December 20, 2013

NEW YORK (A.W.)-What makes a film “socially relevant”? Actress and
filmmaker Nora Armani has defined social relevance as a film’s ability
to stimulate, uplift, and enlighten its audience, leaving it with
something to ponder long after the theater lights have come back up.

For Armani, Hollywood’s fixation on blockbuster violence and what
she refers to as its “violent forms of filmmaking, communication,
and marketing” signals the urgent need for a change in the way the
film industry manages itself.

Nora Armani (Photo by Yannis Nivault)

Enter the “Rated SR-Socially Relevant Film Festival New York,” which
was founded by Armani and is currently being organized by Armani
as Founding Artistic Director and a team of New York city-based
collaborators such as Laurence Hoffman as Director of Programming and
Aude Lambert, Director of Partnerships and Marketing. The Rated SR
team shares Armani’s vision of socially relevant films, explaining
they should mark a return to human interest stories and thematic
elements that are social in nature, and make people more aware and
better informed about the world around them.

The festival will take place in New York City, at the Quad Cinema in
Greenwich Village from March 14-20, 2014. The selection will comprise
a 12-film competition for the Grand Prize, other spotlighted special
film screenings with panels of invited guests, red carpet receptions,
and Q&A sessions with invited filmmakers will round up the program.

Film submissions are being accepted in three categories: feature
films, documentaries, and shorts and the final submissions deadline
is Dec. 30.

The Grand Prize, a week-long release for the winning feature film
at the Quad Cinema under the Quadflix Select program, will grant the
filmmaker a run and 100% of the box office. Another documentary prize
offered by Cinema Libre Studio of Los Angeles, is awarded to a winning
documentary for a DVD – VOD release, while other prizes include awards
for films dealing with particular issues. One award given by Armani
herself is in commemoration of her cousin Vanya Exerjian’s memory as
a victim of violence.

A special trophy designed and donated by Michael Aram will be given
to a personality for socially relevant work in film.

The festival has already attracted multiple partners. Dailymotion, the
31st most visited website in the word is an official media partner,
where the festival’s dedicated page has to date 37 000 visits. Other
partners are the School of Visual Arts Social Documentary Department,
The French Embassy in New York Media division, UniFrance Films
International, Cineuropa, The FIAF Alliance Francaise, New York
Foundation for the Arts, and talks are underway with a number of other
media and organizational partners, including the Paris Film Festival
in France.

The Rated SR Film Festival’s organizers are working to secure grants
and corporate and media partners who are being offered excellent
exposure through the already secured Media partnerships. Sponsorships
are still available:

Born in Egypt to Armenian parents, Armani grew up speaking Armenian,
Arabic, English, and French, to which she later added Italian and
Russian. She studied sociology and English at the American University
in Cairo before going on to obtain her master’s in sociology at the
London School of Economics. Her career has included acting, film
production, script writing, film festival organization, film series
curating, and writing about film. All of this experience is now coming
together as Armani unveils the festival, planned for March 2014.

Armani is quick to point out that her aim is not simply to criticize,
but to offer an alternative, and she is not the only one voicing
doubts about the film industry lately. Steven Spielberg garnered
media attention when he was recently quoted in The Hollywood Reporter
as having predicted that there will soon be “an implosion-or a big
meltdown. There’s going to be an implosion where three or four or
maybe even a half-dozen mega-budget movies are going to go crashing
into the ground, and that’s going to change the paradigm.” The
mega-budget movies Spielberg refers to often cost hundreds of millions
of dollars to make, and rarely make those colossal costs back at
the box office. Products of this model of filmmaking, aside from
being economically unsustainable, tend not to appeal to society’s
better nature.

Armani finds particular fault with the portrayal of violence in the
movies. She argues that the prevalence of guns in movies, television,
and the media are contributing to the worryingly high rate of gun
violence in the U.S. in recent decades. She decries the “normalization
and banalization” of violence, whereby violence ceases to shock us.

Reaching the threshold of numbness that, many argue, American
society has already crossed has dangerous implications. The most
frequently cited example of this phenomenon is the 2012 mass shooting
of young schoolchildren at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown,
Conn. Even the massacre of scores of young children seemingly prompted
no meaningful change in U.S. gun control laws-on the contrary, gun
sales in Newtown have surged.

Armani argues that some of the blame for this incomprehensible
indifference can be laid at Hollywood’s door. Society has been
subjected to an “oversaturation” of sensationalized violence, wherein
even the depiction of violence has become violent in its own way. “We
can’t just tell people things anymore,” Armani says, pointing out
that even traditional news sources sensationalize violence in a
way that comes chillingly close to glorification. One need look no
further than the Rolling Stone’s cover photo featuring a glamour
shot of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the surviving Boston bomber, for support
of Armani’s position.

Violence and social relevance are not, of course, mutually exclusive.

Armani cautions that violence, when it must be portrayed, should be
handled responsibly and not be the theme of a work. Violence, if it is
relevant to the work, should be depicted without sensationalism. Many
vices, in addition to violence, are glamorized in films (“Pretty
Woman” is a prime example). Armani worries that cavalier and dishonest
portrayals of violence and crime have a negative influence on society
and its appreciation of the gravity of these problems in reality.

Examples Armani gives of successful socially relevant films include
movies such as “Silver Linings Playbook”, “The Help,” “The Butler,”
and “Dallas Buyers Club”, among many. Socially relevant films,
Armani explains, should manage to be entertaining while also having
excellent production values, such as a film’s sound, lighting, image,
and acting quality.

Many prominent actors have recently spoken out against Hollywood
violence. Jim Carrey criticized the amount of violence portrayed in
the 2013 movie “Kick-Ass 2,” in which he played a lead role; in the
wake of the Sandy Hook shooting, he refused to promote it. According
to a January 2013 article in the Guardian, “Oscar-winning actor Dustin
Hoffman has dismissed the depiction of gun violence in Hollywood as
‘fraudulent’ and claimed that studios actively discriminate against
actors who refuse to carry firearms onscreen.”

Armani says that it is not only actors who find themselves
uncomfortable with Hollywood’s ceaseless, pervasive violence. “Mothers
don’t know what to show their kids anymore,” she explains. Beyond
the violence parents may not want their children exposed to, there
is the additional issue of name-calling and put-downs that have
become a mainstay of movies marketed at children. “The entertainment
industry needs to reduce its visual ‘carbon’ footprint and think of
its legacy,” Armani says-and now more than ever. The 21st century
has so far distinguished itself as the age of screens, as people are
constantly in what she calls “the visual world” and images are so
much more readily accessible than they were in past decades.

Socially relevant films do appear to be catching on. One great example
is the movie “The Butler” that when it opened it topped the charts
with $25 million from 2,933 theaters in its first frame, “wipe[-ing]
the floor with ‘Kick-Ass 2,'” as CNN put it.

This may indeed be the moment for the socially relevant film movement,
as conscientious consumerism is on the rise in many other industries.

People are now much more aware of the consequences of the ways in
which they spend their money, and are paying more attention to the
ways in which their food, clothing, and even diamonds are sourced.

Even large corporations feel pressure to conduct their business in more
socially responsible ways, as corporations who do not can quickly earn
a bad name via the use of internet petitions or other advocacy tools.

In addition to the social forces working in favor of socially relevant
films, there are clear economic incentives as well. “Human interest
stories,” Armani says, do not require the staggering budgets of
blockbuster films. The blockbuster film budget model is increasingly
being seen as unsustainable, and this makes socially relevant films
an attractive alternative.

For Armani, the issue of violence is a personal as well as an academic
one. Ten years ago, her cousin Vanya Exerjian was stabbed to death,
along with her uncle Jack Exerjian, in a religiously motivated hate
crime in Egypt. Beyond the incomprehensible savagery of the crime,
committed in front of numerous bystanders, the killing of her female
cousin raised the broader issue of violence against women. Armani
herself experienced a significant backlash when she spoke out against
the problem of domestic violence in Armenia at an AIWA conference
in London in the early1990’s. The violence, Armani argues, does not
simply come out of thin air. It is fueled by the violent images that
people are continually bombarded with, images that equate violence with
power and glamor. Perhaps, as Armani argues, a return to human-interest
stories will help people to recognize the humanity in one another.

More information about the festival, including how to submit,
volunteer, donate, support, or otherwise be involved, can be found
by visiting

http://www.armenianweekly.com/2013/12/20/armani-introduces-the-socially-relevant-film/
http://www.ratedsrfilms.org
www.ratedsrfilms.org.

China Provides Armenia With New Customs Inspection System

CHINA PROVIDES ARMENIA WITH NEW CUSTOMS INSPECTION SYSTEM

Global Times, China
Dec 20 2013

Xinhua | 2013-12-20 22:56:41
By Agencies

China signed a memorandum with Armenia on Friday to provide the former
Soviet republic with a mobile inspection system to help facilitate
the country’s customs inspection service.

The memo was signed by Chinese Ambassador to Armenia Tian Changchun
and Gagik Khachatrya, head of Armenia’s State Revenue Committee,
at a cargo terminal of the Armenian Customs Service (ACS).

Under the deal, a new “Nuctech” mobile container and vehicle inspection
system, estimated at over 3 million US dollars, will be presented to
ACS as part of China’s aid to Armenia this year.

Khachatrya believed that the new system, with excellent screening
features and radioactivity monitoring, will definitely increase the
efficiency of the ACS work.

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/833316.shtml#.UrSo1D_xvIU

Les Europeens Doivent Enrichir Leur Offre Economique Aux Etats De L’

LES EUROPEENS DOIVENT ENRICHIR LEUR OFFRE ECONOMIQUE AUX ETATS DE L’EUROPE ORIENTALE

Le Monde, France
19 dec 2013

par Vicken Cheterian

Voir des centaines de milliers de personnes descendre dans les rues
de Kiev pourexiger que leur pays rejoigne l’Union europeenne (UE)
devrait booster le moral de Bruxelles. Cela ne doit cependant pas
masquer le fait que la politique de l’UE vis-a-vis de ses voisins
orientaux a subi une serie de revers au cours des derniers mois. Mais
le plus inquietant serait que l’Union ne dispose pas de plan B,
et queses frontières orientales restent floues.

Le sommet de Vilnius des 28 et 29 novembre etait cense couronner un
long processus de negociations visant a instaurer un large partenariat
politique et economique. Pour l’UE, c’etait une alternative a une
coûteuse adhesion a part entière, un moyen non seulement d’etablir
une cooperation mutuelle, mais egalement de stabiliser les pays situes
aux frontières de l’Union.

NOUVELLE PUISSANCE RUSSE

Les resultats ont ete decevants. Ni l’Armenie ni l’Ukraine, deux pays
qui avaient ete prepares a rejoindre l’accord d’association, ne l’ont
signe. Quant a l’Azerbaïdjan et a la Bielorussie, ils ont declare ne
pas souhaiter, meme a long terme, rejoindrel’UE. Seules la Moldavie
et la Georgie, fermement proeuropeennes, ont adhere a l’association.

La cause de cet echec porte un nom : la Russie. L’UE a considere que sa
proposition d’association etait incompatible avec l’union douanière
chapeautee par Moscou. En realite, chaque pays devait choisir de
se tourner soit vers l’Ouest, soit vers l’Est. Or cette logique,
qui fonctionnait depuis l’effondrement de l’Union sovietique, est
aujourd’hui depassee. Avec l’emergence de la nouvelle puissance russe
a l’est, le problème devait inevitablement se poser.

La contre-offensive russe a ete rapide. Moscou a fait en sorte
d’empecherl’Armenie, dependante de la Russie sur le plan energetique,
de signer un accord d’association avec l’UE pour la contraindre de
rejoindre l’union douanière. La Russie a agi de la meme manière pour
devoyer les projets de rapprochement entre l’Ukraine et l’UE.

L’Ukraine est dependante des marches et des importations d’energie
russes. Moscou a entrave les exportations ukrainiennes et a menace de
fermer ses frontières aux produits ukrainiens. Cette politique musclee
a obtenu le resultat souhaite. Le gouvernement de Kiev a fait savoir
qu’il n’etait pas dispose a rejoindrel’accord d’association.

Cet echec ukrainien montre les limites de la puissance de l’UE. Il
ne faut pascroire que proposer l’accès aux marches europeens suffit a
regler les problèmes de pays dont l’economie n’est pas competitive. On
ignore ce que Vladimir Poutine a propose a Viktor Ianoukovitch,
mais il est clair que c’etait plus que ce qu’offrait Bruxelles.

DES PRÊTS QUI ENTRAÎNERAIENT LA HAUSSE DU CHÔMAGE

Le president ukrainien a sollicite une aide de 20 milliards d’euros
pour hisser son economie appauvrie au niveau europeen. Or l’UE ne lui
propose que 610 millions, soulignant que son pays pouvait emprunter
le reste auprès du FMI dans le cadre d’un accord signe en 2010 pour
un pret de 11,5 milliards. Mais ces prets sont assortis de conditions
qui entraîneraient une forte hausse du chômage et feraientperdre a M.

Ianoukovitch l’election presidentielle de 2015.

La question essentielle est : quelle sera la place de la Russie
dans la futurearchitecture politique europeenne ? Depuis vingt ans,
l’expansion de l’UE a l’est s’est effectuee en depit de Moscou et
sur son ancienne zone d’influence. La Russie traversait une periode
troublee et n’etait pas en mesure de stopper cette expansion ni celle
de l’OTAN. Mais cette epoque est revolue depuis la guerre de 2008
entre la Russie et la Georgie.

Par ailleurs, la politique russe de l’UE manque d’imagination, alors
qu’elle en aurait desesperement besoin. La competition russo-europeenne
autour des territoires de l’Europe orientale et du Caucase est une
lutte asymetrique.

L’Europe y apparaît comme une grosse et lourde machine dotee d’un
cadre institutionnel et d’un processus de decision complexes. Elle
fait face a une Russie dans laquelle le pouvoir est concentre entre
les mains de Vladimir Poutine, un expert en man~uvres rapides et
contre-attaques inopinees.

Il est possible qu’aujourd’hui l’UE ne dispose que d’une offre limitee
a l’egard des pays d’Europe orientale qui lui restent exterieurs,
qu’il s’agisse de l’Ukraine ou du Caucase. L’Europe devrait egalement
apprendre a distinguer la politique exterieure de l’Ukraine de ses
conflits internes.

MAN~LUVRER EN PERMANENCE ENTRE DEUX BLOCS

La mobilisation de rue en cours a Kiev pourrait renverser le president
Ianoukovitch, mais cela ne reglera pas tout. Cela s’est deja produit
une fois. Celui, quel qu’il soit, qui accedera au pouvoir a Kiev
devra man~uvrer en permanence entre les deux blocs (UE et Russie)
afin de tirer le meilleur parti possible de leur rivalite.

Cette concurrence entre les deux camps pourrait destabiliser un
peu plus les pays les plus fragiles. Tout comme l’orientation vers
l’Ouest de la Georgie lui a coûte l’Abkhazie et l’Ossetie du Sud,
le choix de l’Ukraine de rejoindre l’un ou l’autre camp comporte des
risques : la fracture culturelle entre la partie occidentale du pays,
qui parle ukrainien, et les regions russophones de l’Est et du Sud
se cristallise de plus en plus autour des identites politiques.

Ni la ” revolution orange ” de 2004 ni la mobilisation proeuropeenne
actuelle n’ont reussi a combler ce fosse. L’economie ukrainienne
se porte mal et, au lieu d’un choix exclusif, elle a besoin pour sa
stabilite a la fois des marches europeen et russe. L’Ukraine a besoin
d’une entente entre Bruxelles et Moscou qui ouvre des possibilites
de cooperation, et non d’accords exclusifs. Bruxelles est-elle prete
aproposer un tel compromis a Kiev ?

Traduit de l’anglais par Gilles Berton

Vicken Cheterian (Chercheur independant a Genève)

Vicken Cheterian est l’auteur de ” From Perestroika to Rainbow
Revolutions : Reform and Revolution after Socialism “,

London : Hurst, 250 p. (non traduit)

http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2013/12/19/les-europeens-doivent-enrichir-leur-offre-economique-aux-etats-de-l-europe-orientale_4336614_3232.html

Stepan Kerkyasharian Retires

STEPAN KERKYASHARIAN RETIRES

Neos Kosmos (The Hellenic Perspective) , Australia
Dec 19 2013

Ethnic, religious and community leaders gathered at the Le Montage
Function Centre in Lilyfield in Sydney to celebrate the achievements
of Dr Stepan Kerkyasharian AO

19 Dec 2013

Ethnic, religious and community leaders gathered at the Le Montage
Function Centre in Lilyfield in Sydney a few days ago to celebrate the
achievements of Dr Stepan Kerkyasharian AO, the retiring Chairperson
of the NSW Community Relations Commission. The special guests on the
evening were the NSW Minister for Citizenship and Communities Victor
Dominello and Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells, representing the
Prime Minister Tony Abbott.

Stepan Kerkasharian, of Armenian descent, was born in Cyprus and
arrived in Australia in 1967 via England. His contribution to
multiculturalism in this country span over a period of more than
30 years.

He was associated with the Armenian community firstly in Melbourne
where he taught in their community language school. Then in radio
through SBS where he was a key player in helping to establish SBS
television.

In 1989 he was appointed to the Chair of the Ethnic Affairs Commission
which evolved into the Community Relations Commission (CRC). Stepan
Kerkasharian served seven state premiers and numerous ministers over
the years.

The Community Relations Commission under his leadership took a
leading and proactive role to ensure that racism has no place in
today’s multicultural society in NSW and in Australia. Importantly,
he helped enshrine in law the principles of multiculturalism. He,
along with his fellow commissioners, assisted communities with the
grants program administered through the CRC. He also established
an inter-faith dialogue amongst the various religious organisations
in NSW.

http://neoskosmos.com/news/en/Stepan-kerkyasharian-retires