Khojaly : Meeting with Ambassador – Embassy of Mexico in London

Russell Pollard
March 13 2014

Khojaly : Meeting with Ambassador – Embassy of Mexico in London

After writing to the Mexican Ambassador in the UK on a number of
occasions plus many follow-up phone calls on their “recognition” of
Khojaly last year , I was finally invited to discuss the subject, in
person, at their London office, on March 12 2014.

Having also written to the Colombian, Czech, and Peruvian embassies,
Mexico was the only Embassy that expressed genuine concern about this
subject, and particularly the way that their name was being used by
Azerbaijan for propaganda purposes. In addition to expressing support
for Azerbaijan on Khojaly, Mexico City had also erected a statue of
Aliyev in their main public park. This was subsequently removed which
resulted in political tension with Azerbaijan.

My meeting with Ambassador Alejandro Estivill was an opportunity to
take him through the detail of my article Khojaly: The Deception of
Azerbaijan and to explain more of the contextual background to the
events as well as ensuring that he fully understood all of the
implications. I presented the sequence of events, and the objective
source facts. He understood very quickly the issues I was explaining,
and saw the questions that this raised with the Azeri propaganda. I
asked him to accept that there was significant ambiguity and that
perhaps Azeri officials should be invited to answer the questions that
he had raised.

Following my original communication he had done his own research in to
how Azerbaijan was using the name of Mexico for their own publicity.
This was a matter of concern to him. I also highlighted that,
externally, it was seen that Mexico was “recognising” Khojaly in
return for investment from Azerbaijan. He assured me that this was
not true.

He confirmed that his next action would be to send all of my
documentation to Ambassador Juan Manuel Gomez Robledo ( Foreign
Ministry of Mexico – Undersecretary for Multilateral Affairs and Human
Rights) in Mexico.

Meeting the Ambassador and communicating the real facts behind
Khojaly, highlighting the questions that need to be asked, and so
creating a major sense of concern with key officials in the Mexican
Government exceeded my initial expectations. Now, Mexico’s
unconditional withdrawal of their previous statement on Khojaly is the
only final outcome that I will be truly satisfied with.

As I was about to leave his office at the end of the meeting , he
turned to me with a serious expression and asked me if I felt
concerned for my safety or had received personal threats from
Azerbaijan. I smiled, as I knew, for certain, that he had genuinely
understood the magnitude of the information I’d just given him.

http://russellpollard.wordpress.com/2014/03/12/khojaly-meeting-with-ambassador-embassy-of-mexico-in-london/

World Bank Supports Improvements In Education In Armenia

WORLD BANK SUPPORTS IMPROVEMENTS IN EDUCATION IN ARMENIA

Targeted News Service
March 13, 2014 Thursday 12:18 AM EST

WASHINGTON

World Bank issued the following news release:

The World Bank Board of Executive Directors today approved a US$30
million financing for the Education Improvement Project in Armenia.

The project will support the improvement of school readiness for
children entering primary education and the physical conditions in
upper-secondary schools. It will also promote greater links between
higher education institutions and labor market in Armenia.

For over a decade the Government of Armenia has been pursuing reforms
in the education sector targeted at strengthening the quality of
education services delivered. These reforms include but are not
limited to the development of the new national curriculum framework,
standards, and syllabi for general education, extension of the general
education system from grade 11 to 12, establishment of the Assessment
and Testing Center (ATC) for enhanced capacity to assess student
performance, and provision of universal access to internet to all
schools in Armenia. The latter has considerably improved access and
the quality of general education.

The new project will support improving the school readiness among those
entering first grade by expanding preschool coverage in impoverished
rural areas benefiting approximately 2,400 children per year. 17 high
schools will be rehabilitated with enhanced construction and safety
standards to benefit approximately 10,200 high school students in all
regions. The rehabilitated high schools, would provide more appropriate
teaching and learning environments to the students, including safer
infrastructure, adequate ICT equipment and digital teaching and
learning materials. The project activities will specifically cover
vulnerable population including ethnic groups and disabled children.

“Establishing equitable and high-quality education system has been
a corner stone of Armenia’s education reforms in the past decade,”
says Jean-Michel Happi, World Bank Country Manager for Armenia. “This
project will continue improving the relevance of educational services
through accessible quality education at all levels, including for
higher education, thus contributing to building country’s human
capital necessary to enhance the competitiveness of the economy.”

The project will also support strengthening of the National Center of
Education Technology for monitoring the school network and providing
adequate ICT coverage and publicly available relevant and timely
data to all educational institutions and to the society. The quality
of general education would be also increased through the revisions
and improvements in curriculum. This would indirectly benefit almost
370,000 students per year. The support for Tertiary Education through
the envisioned mainstreaming of the Competitive Innovation Fund (CIF)
would impact about 3,000 students annually, whose academic programs
would be modernized and made more responsive to the needs of employers.

“The project will address the readiness to school of over 12,000
five year old children living in rural impoverished areas that lack
preschool services,” says Cristian Aedo, World Bank Task Team Leader
of the project. “This will positively impact the poor population as it
will improve the opportunities for children to be comparably successful
at later stages of their education. The project will actively engage
in activities that will boost the learning environment from full
rehabilitation of 15 percent of high schools across the country to
development of electronic content.”

Over these years the Government has successfully increased the
enrollment at preschool level along with pursuing reforms of higher
education after joining the Bologna Process in 2005. To successfully
complete the process, this project would be specifically focused
on community-based pre-schools and enhancing enrollment rates in
participating kindergartens and schools; the improvement in teaching
and learning conditions in high schools; and curriculum revisions. The
project will support the development of an integrated information
system that will provide necessary data and analysis for policy making
and recurrent improvement of general secondary and tertiary education.

The proposed activities will also enhance partnerships between
universities and the private sector for modernizing the higher
education sector in Armenia.

Total financing of the project is US$37.5 million, of which US$7.5
million will be the Government’s contribution. The World Bank will
provide a US$15 million credit on standard blend IDA terms at a fixed
interest rate of 1.25% per annum with a maturity of 25 years and a 5
year grace period, as well as a US$15 million IBRD loan of variable
spread, with a 10 year grace period and the total repayment term of
25 yearrs.

Since joining the World Bankn in 1992 and IDA in 1993, the commitments
to Armenia total approximately US$ 1,818.04 million.

Contact: Elena Karaban, 202/473-9277, [email protected]

Lawrence In Arabia – Review

LAWRENCE IN ARABIA – REVIEW

[ Part 2.2: “Attached Text” ]

A natural leader with glorious irreverence and a tortured sexuality.

But Scott Anderson’s book also explores how TE Lawrence contributed
to the making of the modern Middle East

Christopher de Bellaigue The Guardian, Friday 14 March 2014 08.30 GMT

ast-review

Stature and pathos … Peter O’Toole in Lawrence of
Arabia. Photograph: Popperfoto/Popperfoto/Getty Images

Over the next four years of commemoration, as our opinions of the
first world war alter subtly under the influence of new facts, one
reputation seems unassailable. The nimble and humane approach that TE
Lawrence took to war in the Middle East is a cherished contrast to the
dunderheaded monomania that we have come to associate with the generals
of the western front. Lawrence embodies the committed “easterner”, not
only because he viewed the Ottoman empire’s Arab provinces as a vital
theatre of war, or even because he identified so strongly with their

Lawrence in Arabia: War, Deceit, Imperial Folly and the Making of
the Modern Middle East by Scott Anderson Buy the book

Tell us what you think:Star-rate and review this book

inhabitants, but because he calls to mind something other than Flanders
mud – the light and dust of the Levant.

His reputation in the territories where he did his work is more
complicated. Even now he is loathed by Turkish patriots because in
1916 he instigated a revolt that cost them their Arab possessions
and boxed them into Asia Minor. Many modern Arabs regard Lawrence
as well-intentioned but thwarted, and perhaps even complicit in his
own thwarting, for while he was the representative of an empire that
had promised them independence, all they actually got was a stunted,
truncated and imperially supervised condominium with a Jewish homeland
– Israel in embryo – sticking out of its belly.

The ironic subtitle of Seven Pillars of Wisdom, Lawrence’s account of
his role in the Arab revolt, is “A Triumph”. Its climactic passages of
abasement and lost honour show that in Lawrence’s estimation even the
Arabs’ victorious entry into Damascus, in September 1917, was spoiled
by the impending British betrayal. He hated his part in the deception.

Lawrence “of Arabia” has been done almost to death by biographers,
military historians and filmmakers. They have been drawn to his
genius as a leader and the ill-fitting components of that genius
– his misgivings as an imperialist, his tortured sexuality, and
that compound of arrogance and self-effacement (“backing into the
limelight”, as someone put it, allegedly Churchill) that has kept
his soul satisfyingly open to interpretation.

In his new book, Scott Anderson expands and contextualises the familiar
Lawrence story – as his title, Lawrence in Arabia, suggests.

Rather than depict a hero in isolation, he puts Lawrence alongside
three spooks who rubbed shoulders with him in the Middle East: Aaron
Aaronsohn, a Jewish colonist in Palestine, who spied for Britain
as a way of furthering Zionism; Carl Prufer, a German diplomat who
dreamed of fomenting jihad against the British; and William Yale, a
well-connected oil man (his great-great-uncle founded Yale University)
who became, in August 1917, the state department’s “special agent”
for the Middle East.

Anderson’s supporting characters are colourful, even if none approaches
Lawrence in stature and pathos. Prufer was a brilliant linguist and
an energetic lothario – his many girlfriends included Minna “Fanny”
Weizmann, whose brother Chaim was Europe’s most prominent Zionist and
went on to become Israel’s first president. His vision of the Middle
East was, however, narrowed by the usual ethnic blinkers (cowardly
Arabs, docile Jews), and he ended the war scheming irrelevantly.

Yale at least finished up on the winning side, but America had yet
to become involved in the Middle East, and he contributed little.

Mercenary, priggish and inept, even he was shocked when the US
government called him to the 1919 peace conference at Versailles
“as an expert on Arabian affairs”.

By far the most intriguing – and significant – of Anderson’s trio is
Aaronsohn. “A towering man given to portliness … brilliant
and arrogant, passionate and combative”, in 1915 this celebrated
agronomist was trusted enough by the Ottomans to be placed in charge
of a campaign to suppress a plague of locusts. But 1915 was also
the year of the Armenian genocide; Aaronsohn feared that the Jewish
colonists of Palestine would be next. By 1917 he had overcome British
suspicions to establish a spy ring, including his sister, Sarah,
that passed on information about the Turks in Palestine. In October
of that year, Sarah was captured by the Ottomans, whom she defied,
first by withstanding brutal treatment, then by killing herself. Her
brother was in London conferring with Chaim Weizmann at the time. No
longer were the Aaronsohns interested solely in self-defence; the
new goal, as articulated by Weizmann, was a Jewish Palestine “under
British protection”.

Anderson is a bleak but fair-minded historian, alive to the cynicism
and prejudice that decided actions on all sides. He shows, for example,
how the British war effort was hampered by an ill-advised contempt
for Ottoman abilities – evidenced during the disastrous Gallipoli
campaign when the allies landed on the very shoreline where the Turks
were strongest.

Aaronsohn and his fellow agents felt a similar revulsion for their Arab
neighbours in Palestine. The agents’ dishonest depiction of the Turks’
evacuation of the port city of Jaffa in 1917 as a vicious anti-Jewish
pogrom was “one of the most consequential disinformation campaigns”
of the war, for it was accepted unquestioningly in the west and
hardened the opinion of world Jewry in favour of Zionism.

Crucial to the Zionist effort was broadening its appeal to western
policymakers, prominent among whom was a breed of well-heeled British
romantics who floated around the Middle East offering solutions of
breathtaking (and often contradictory) simplicity to problems that
even now are considered intractable. The Yorkshire landowner Sir
Mark Sykes was the nonpareil of these meddlesome amateurs; in 1916
he carved up the Middle East in a secret deal with France, only to
propose an alliance of Jews, Arabs and Armenians that would freeze
the French out. Sykes’s Christian faith was cheered by the idea of
a Jewish return to the Holy Land; he adopted Zionism and became an
ally of Aaronsohn. It was Sykes who announced the British cabinet’s
decision to endorse a “Jewish national home” with the immortal words –
to its future first president – “Dr Weizmann, it’s a boy!”

Not far away, ducking behind Turkish lines to blow up railway tracks
and stiffen Arab morale, TE Lawrence did not hide his dismay at the
moral and political “hole” Sykes was digging for him. Lawrence loved
the fractious, headstrong and thoroughly unhousetrained Arab tribes,
and was proud of having championed their commander in the field,
Emir Faisal, a scion of the Hashemites, the hereditary custodians
of Mecca. Whatever the exploits of Faisal and his men in trouncing
the Turks, however, after the war they would be unable to resist
the Anglo-French desire for overall control of the region – as well
as the political acumen of the Zionists, as the Jewish state edged
closer to realisation.

Lawrence was among the first to predict that it would not all be plain
sailing for the Jews in their new home, telling Yale in 1917 that
“if a Jewish state is to be created in Palestine, it will have to be
done by force of arms amid an overwhelmingly hostile population”. As
for Faisal, he was kicked out of Syria by the French in 1920 and the
Iraqi monarchy he later founded under British auspices lasted until
1958, when it was overthrown in a republican revolution. Nowadays,
Hashemite power survives only in the tiny state of Jordan. For all
his heartfelt Arabism, Lawrence himself was a failed kingmaker.

So why does his finely grained character continue to impress on
our vision of the Middle East – and on Anderson’s intelligent and
original, if somewhat unevenly written, group portrait? One reason
is his glorious irreverence, disappearing into the desert to avoid
unwelcome orders, exulting in his ignorance of the protocols of the
commissariat. Also, he was right in many things, recognising before the
Gallipoli debacle what subsequent military historians have tended to
confirm: that the port of Alexandretta, on Turkey’s exposed underside,
would have been a preferable launch pad for an assault.

Needless to say, his recommendations to that effect were not acted on.

And yet for all Lawrence’s outsider status and unconventional views,
Britain’s military machine in the Middle East contained enough
sound men for him to thrive – and to emerge from the war one of the
most admired men in Britain. In his well-constructed demolition of
Britain’s “amateurs”, Anderson neglects the paradox that Lawrence,
an archaeologist who never received a day’s military training, a
scholar and an aesthete amid the blood and guts, was the greatest
amateur of them all.

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/mar/14/lawrence-arabia-modern-middle-e

World Title Candidates To Determine Magnus Carlsen’s Next Opponent

WORLD TITLE CANDIDATES TO DETERMINE MAGNUS CARLSEN’S NEXT OPPONENT

Leonard Barden
The Guardian, Friday 14 March 2014 19.48 GMT

3349: Danyyl Dvirnyy v Judit Polgar, European championship 2014. How
did the all-time No1 woman (Black, to move) score in style here?

Illustration: Graphic

After occupying the chess throne for barely four months Magnus Carlsen
will soon be confronted with his first challenger.

The world title candidates is under way this week in the Siberian oil
town of Khanty-Mansiysk, where eight grandmasters are competing for
a EURO 600,000 prize fund and the jackpot of a multi-million dollar
series against the 23-year-old Norwegian.

Four of the candidates are Russian, another two are from the former
Soviet Union. This lopsided selection from the world elite is due to
the weighting given to direct qualifiers over current rankings.

America’s Hikaru Nakamura and Italy’s Fabiano Caruana are top-10 GMs
but both failed to secure a candidates place.

The world No2, Levon Aronian, is the favourite, with a smooth and
creative playing style and a host of tournament successes to his
credit. At the age of 31 the Armenian is at his playing peak and
his one downside is the vulnerability to pressure he showed when
failing in the last two candidates. And Aronian hit trouble in the
very first round on Thursday, losing tamely to the ex-champion,
India’s Vishy Anand.

The other major contender is Vlad Kramnik, who in 2000 defeated the
great Garry Kasparov for the world title, then held it for seven
years. Kramnik lost out to Carlsen only on tie-break in the 2013
candidates, and believes that he can qualify this time and then prove
that the Norwegian is beatable. The well-prepared Russian is a deep
strategist and a fine endgame player, though at 38 years old tactical
errors have started to creep in.

Most commentators and fellow GMs believe that one of these two will
win, so who can cause an upset? The candidates will be an opportunity
for Sergey Karjakin, 24, who was the youngest ever GM at age 12 and
who has long been groomed as Russia’s answer to Carlsen. Karjakin has
yet to contend seriously for the world title, but his age, technical
skills, and ambition mark him as ready for a surge to the top.

The candidates games can be viewed free and live online but beware –
due to the time difference the start is 9am GMT.

What of Carlsen? The world champion has been relaxing at a series of
speed events in Brazil, where he crushed that country’s finest and
received four World Cup final tickets as part of his fee. His official
rapid chess rating, which is separate from his normal classical rating,
jumped by 37 points and he advanced from No3 to No1, displacing the
speed specialist Nakamura.

The opening 1 Nf3 f5?! 2 d3! is already better for White, and Carlsen
here quickly dominates the light squares, sinks his knight at the
fine square e6, controls the entire board, and is ready for a decisive
rook invasion when Black resigns.

Magnus Carlsen v Andres Rodríguez

1 Nf3 f5 2 d3 Nf6 3 e4 d6 4 exf5 Bxf5 5 d4 Qd7 6 Nc3 g6 7 Bd3 Bg7
8 O-O Nc6 9 d5 Nb4 10 Bxf5 gxf5 11 a3 Na6 12 Nd4 Nc5 13 b4 Nce4 14
Nxe4 fxe415 Ne6 Rg8 16 Bb2 c6 17 c4 Bh8 18 Re1 Rg6 19 Bxf6 exf6 20
Qh5 Qf7 21Qf5 Qg8 22 g3 Kf7 23 Rxe4 1-0

This Carlsen win follows a familiar pattern where his opponent has
an opening edge then blows it by 17 e4? (Ra1!) Carlsen finds the
tactical shots Rxc3! Bxa3! and e3! and White resigns when worse on
both material and position.

Rafael Leitão v Magnus Carlsen

1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 Nf3 Nf6 4 e3 Bg4 5 cxd5 Bxf3 6 Qxf3 cxd5 7 Nc3 e6
8 Bd3 Nc6 9 0-0 Bb4 10 Bd2 0-0 11 Rac1 Rc8 12 a3 Ba5 13 b4 Bc7 14 Qh3
Bd615 f4 a5 16 b5 Ne7 17 e4? Rxc3! 18 Rxc3 dxe4 19 Bc4 Bxa3! 20 Rxa3
Qxd4+21 Qe3 Qxc4 22 Rc1 Qxb5 23 Rxa5 Qd7 24 Rac5 Nf5 25 Qc3 e3! 26
Bxe3 Nd5 0-1

3349 1…Qc2! 2 Rxa5 (if 2 Ra2 Rxa4!) Qxe2+ 3 Kg1 Qe3+ 4 Kh1 Rf2 and
White resigned since after 5 Qxe5+ Kh7 he gets mated.

http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/mar/14/magnus-carlsen-world-title-candidates

The Armenian Islamic Tribe In Syria

THE ARMENIAN ISLAMIC TRIBE IN SYRIA

March 14, 2014

By Kevork George Apelian
Translated and abridged by Vahe H. Apelian

We depart from Kamishli to visit our companion’s, Dr. Garo Hekimian’s,
Kurdified nephew, Mehran Hekimian. The road is long but is straight
and makes for a smooth ride. The road going from Kamishli to Ras al
Ein runs parallel to the Syrian-Turkish boarder. At times it approaches
the border so much that the facial expressions of the Turkish soldiers
standing on guard on the towers become visible. A barbwire separates
the two countries.

Once in a while, along the road, we see young girls who are walking
in the barren vast expense.

-“Don”t they go to school, asks Annie?” Annie is my niece. We are
travelling in her husband”s- Tom”s – car. My wife also is accompanying
me.

-“Of course they go. However, after school they work in the fields
to pull the plants and collect the lentil and the beans”, replies
the doctor.

The comfort in the car contrasts sharply with the scorching desert
of this inhospitable terrain. Through these vast expanses almost a
century ago my compatriots walked. Hungry, thirsty, bare-footed and
emaciated, how did they manage to walk? Those who were massacred
in Ras al Ein were done for, the survivors were herded to out far
to Der Zor for their final reckoning. How fortunate are the girls
we see outside every now and then gathering lentil or bean. They at
least have shoes and are not starving and are not emaciated.

We pass through large and small villages.

-“Here in this village there are also Kurdified Armenians”, notes
Dr. Garo.

What is there to say or do? What Armenian in these places, isolated
from the rest of the world, almost forgotten? I wonder. Their
forbearers were forced to abandon their beautiful country and settle
here. Of course the Armenian settlers here were fortunate. Others
had not the opportunity to remain alive.

-“This is the Amouda village or city like settlement. There are a
number of Armenians here as well”, says Garo.

After driving for a considerable period of time we arrive Ras al Ein.

We have been toldthat there is a noted restaurant here, Restaurant
Serop. I had been in touch with the man and I was told that he
has interesting stories to tell about his father. The man had not
volunteered to tell us. We also had neither the heart nor the time to
dine. We headed Dr. Garo”s nephew, Mohammad (Mehran) Mahmoud”s house.

The tall statured Mahmoud invited us in. The foreign car had aroused
the interest not only of the neighbors and the lads on the streets,
but also of the surrounding at large. The host had assured everyone
that we were not harmful people. We stepped in, into a long and
large hall with twin divisions. The “eastern” side was furnished
with pillows and cushions and the “western” side was furnished with
armchairs. Hardly had we stepped in we noted, to our great surprise,
a wooden bust of King Trdat, an Armenian tricolor scarf, and few
other Armenian pictures. What are these artifacts doing in Kurdified
Hovhannes Hekimian”s son – Mahmood”s – guest room, I wonder.

There is a bit of a dismissive smile on Mahmood”s face, at the site
of our puzzlement.

-“Our blood is Armenian blood”, he emphasizes.

He wants to know the purpose of our visit. His nephew, Dr. Garo,
had already explained to him. However, he wanted to hear from us. I
explain. He shakes his head.

-“I am glad you came, for no one is interested in us. Not the
government of Armenia or the Armenian Church. We are people who live
on social margin. The Armenians do not accept us, nor do the Kurds. We
applied to the Government of Armenia, but nothing happened. You have
come out of interest in us, we are thankful.”

I gift him a copy of my book”s, titled “Martyrdom for Life”, Arabic
translation.

-“This is our Salman Derbo!” – exclaims Mohammd Mahmood.

-“Do you know him?” I ask.

-“Of course. His son lives here” clarifies Mohammad.

He arranges to call a neighbor”s wife who enters the room and sees
the book”s cover and is totally amazed.

-“This”, she says pointing to the picture on the book”s cover, “is my
grandfather, Salman Drbo. Each and every home of our extended family
has this picture hanging on a wall.”

Her father, Khalaf is away. He is the son of Hadjentsi born Aram
Keklikian, turned Bedouin Chief named Salman Drbo who is a cousin of
the famed Armenian American orthopedic doctor who treated a young
soldier named Robert Dole. I autograph and gift a copy of the book
to give to Aram”s, that is to say Salman Drbo”s son, Khalaf, and
hand the book to his daughter. She is very happy. She stays with us
throughout our visit. It is evident that she is pretty liberal minded.

She shakes hand with the men and speaks freely.

-“Ya Mahmood” I say, “we have come to gather information about people
like you. What do you have to tell us about your father?”

-“Whatever I know, I will tell you, says Mohammad Mahmood. My father,
Hovhannes Hekimian, was from Geghetsi village of Moush. He was born in
1908. We were told that he had two brothers, named Anto and Avedis. He
had two sisters, Srpouhie and Azniv. My father was forced out of Moush
and was brought here where he remained. He was a kid in those days. He
was named Ebrahem and settled in Meyrkez where he married a Kurdish
woman named Khamsa. They have four daughters and four sons. I am the
eldest of them. My brothers live in this area. I will take you to our
village Meyrkez. I came and settled in Ras al Ein to educate my sons.

There is no school in Meyrkez.

-“Mahmood, how many children do you have? I ask

-“I have 5 sons”, replies Mahmood. “Thank Allah. The eldest is
Ebrahem or Apraham. He left the area and went to Europe and settled
in Holland. He converted to Christianity there. The whole family was
baptized. The names of his sons, my grandsons, are Sevag and Daron.

Hence he cannot come to these areas any more. You know, he became
a Christian.”

“My other son is Emir. He has four beautiful daughters. The third is
Akram. We call the fourth Ayden. However, he is Vrej. My last son
is Arman, that is to say Armen. He serves the Syrian army for his
compulsory military service.”

The daughters of his son Emir enter. Indeed, the grandfather has every
reason to boast of their beauty. They are well-dressed attractive
girls.

-“Ya brother George, says Mahmood, you do not ask their names. I
will tell you. The elder is Nanor, the second is Nairi, the third
Armine”, and the fourth if Menar. Beautiful, aren”t they? I mean to
say the names.

My companions and I remain speechless at the sight of such beauty and
such authentic Armenian names in this part of the world and in such
a family. These girls are the granddaughters of Mshetsi Hovhannes
Hekimian. They are born and raised in Ras al Ein. They bear the brunt
of the consequences of the Genocide perpetrated against their race
94 years ago. In spite of their beautiful names, what will eventually
become of them? I wonder.

-“My daughter is also named Menar”, explains Dr. Garo. “It is a name
used in Armenia. My Armenia born and raised wife named her.”

-“I congratulate you Emir”, I say, and add “May God guard your
daughters. You have given them such beautiful names”.

-“We are also Armenians”, says Emir. “I wanted to learn our Armenian
language. I had textbooks brought from Beirut. However, without help
I could not learn the language.”

Emir then shows me his cell phone as if to certify that being an
Armenian is not an abstract thing for him. There are such Armenian
pictures that only a zealous Armenian would carry. They include
pictures of the Tricolor, Lisbon 5 and of Armenian emblems.

-“Akh George, you did not ask me about my wife”, reminds me Mahmood.

“She is also an Armenian daughter.”

-“Akh George, you did not ask me about my wife”, reminds me Mohammad
Mahmood. She is also an Armenian daughter.

In Kurdish attire and manners, Emena extends unexpected welcoming
warmth to us. She is a Muslim woman, wearing scarf. She sits next
to me and allows herself the liberty to speak freely, to narrate and
to laugh. I instinctively rest my arm over her shoulder while being
pictured. She does not object neither does she distance herself from
me. Aren”t we long lost bosom relatives?

-“Emena, who was your father?” I ask

-“My father is there”, she says, and points to picture hanging on
the wall. “My father was also Moushetsi, Yeghia Sessoyan. Later his
name became Mohammad Issa Mahamed. He was two years old during the
massacres.”

At that moment Emena”s brother enters. He is a lawyer and his name is
Abdel Rahan Mohammad Essa Mahamed. He is a middle-aged man. Sister
and brother tell us about their father who passed away in 2008. The
Sessoyan family numbered forty members. Yeghia or Mohammad Mahamed
settled in a village named Bsis that is 30 Km from Ras al Ein. In
1948 he married an Arab woman named Abta. They have 2 boys and 5 girls.

Yeghia married another woman as well. They have seven daughters and
one son. Yeghia”s wives are alive and live in the same village. Emena
also has relatives from his father”s side who speak Kurdish or
Turkish. Some of her relatives do not like to tell their family
stories. Emena also tells that her father Yeghia had a sister named
Sosse who threw herself into river least she be taken as the wife of
Turk or a Kurd. Emena repeatedly tells that she likes to associate
with Armenians and that our meeting has made her very happy.

-“Mehran (Mohammad)” I ask, “how is that your father was Kurdified
while your nephew Dr. Garo has remained Armenian?”

-“His father remained within the Armenian community. However, he
speaks only Kurdish. Garo studied in Armenia”, explains Mohammad.

-“How is that you found each other?” I inquire.

-“In 1972 I used to work for a sheikh”, says Mohammad. “One day,
while in the city, I came across a store whose sign bore the name
Antranig Hekimian. I suspected that we are relatives, but I wanted
to assure myself before meeting him. I inquired with the church in
Ras al Ein and was able to ascertain that we are related after which
I approached the owner. He was hesitant at the beginning at the site
of a Kurd claiming family relation, but later he warmed towards me
and became emotional. I invited him and his family to our house. We
slaughtered lambs to celebrate the occasion. It was my dream to find
out my father”s relatives. My dream has now become a reality.”

-“How do you get along with your newly found relations?” I inquire

-“Very well”, responds Mohamad. “I am a Kurd and a Muslim. They are
Armenians and Christians. However, it”s the same blood that flows
through our veins. You can tell that Garo feels very comfortable in
our house.”

At that moment I saw Dr. Garo in the kitchen preparing a hookah for
his leisurely smoking.

-“Do you have a community?” I inquire

-“Of course we do”, responds Mohammad. “We have our own tribe,
ashiret. Let me show you our member list”. He produces a document
and I read page after page Kurdish names with their official
registration numbers, their addresses and the signatures of the
family”s patriarchs. There are 10 to 11 such records on each page.

-“Our ashiret has its bylaws”, elaborates Mohammad. “We are especially
attentive that the members of our tribe do not marry outside the
tribe. If one wants to marry outside the tribe, then he or she has to
take permission from the sheikh of our tribe, Elie Hovagimian. All able
bodied males between the ages of 15 to 70 pay membership dues. From
this coffer the tribe attends to the needs of the members, such as
if one has an accident or kills someone, the compensation comes from
the tribe”s coffer.”

-“Why have you organized this tribe?” I ask.

-“Very simple, explains Mohammad. In this part of the world the
prevailing social order is the system of tribes-ashiret. Every one
has the support of a tribe. If you do not belong to a tribe, you are
no one. You cannot protect your rights.”

-“When was your tribe organized?” I inquire

-“Our tribe was organized in 1998”, explains Mohammad. “We conducted
a census and we organized the tribe. We have 25,000 members.

Our tribe is known as the ARMENIAN ISLAMIC TRIBE. We are Muslims but
we are Armenians. Not all Islamized Armenians in the region are members
of our tribe. There is a big number of them who are not members.”

At this point Mohammad”s brother-in-law intercepts and says that
the lawyers of the tribe have their own organization and present
themselves as Muslim Armenians.

On this May afternoon I remain dumbfounded. Here, the sons and
daughters of the survivors of the Armenian Genocide not only honor
and perpetuate the memory of their parents or grandparents but also
have organized themselves into a distinct community of which we had
not known before in spite of modern communication. They are Muslims,
and they are Armenians!

Mehran arranges for his sons to take us for a sightseeing trip. We
head towards Khabour River, the main tributary of the Euphrates River.

There was a time when many Armenians on forced marches were drowned
in the raging water of this river. We approach the river but remain
standstill and astonished. The river is completely dry. The dams in
Turkey threaten to starve Syria and Iraq of water. “Khabour River”
I say to myself, “is it the curse of those who drowned in your waters
that has brought you to this state?”

We enter an abandoned mansion. The canal next to the mansion runs dry.

There are abandoned water pumps rusting along the riverbank. We are
told that there was a time when water from here flew hundreds of
kilometers for irrigation.

There is a sadness that permeates all around, rusting water pumps,
an abandoned mansion and the memory of the many who walked by the
riverbank or were drowned in it. We leave the area and head to Mreykez
to meet the rest of Mohammad Mahmood”s family in their parental house.

We arrive the village by dusk. We meet Mohammad”s four brothers and
one sister. All are very happy that we have paid them a visit.

Momentarily Mohammad takes leave of us and enters a room to pay
his respects to his mother, Hovhannes Hekimian”s widow, who is on
her deathbed. In the courtyard I meet two other Armenians. It is
noteworthy that most of the lands of the village and its surrounding
belong to five Armenian families. The chieftain of the village is named
Garabed. This meeting in the twilight of the dusk in this remote area,
far from the rest of the world but otherwise in an Armenian enclave
of sorts fills me up with emotion……

Just prior to our departing, Mehran wears his kafiyeh and igal and
teasingly asks me if I will put a copy of his picture in Bedouin attire
on the cover of my upcoming book much like I did for Salmon Drbo.

Salman Drbo, was not even in his early teens when he was forcefully
separated from his mother. Over the decades he had assumed that
his mother had died along with the rest of the Armenians. However,
serendipitously, he discovered that his mother was alive along many
of his compatriots. Mother and son met for the very first time when
both had entered different phases of their lives. Young Aram Keklikian
had grown up to become Salman Dro, the chief of his tribe. His mother
had remarried and raised another family and had her first grandson
named after her first husband who was taken away and she never saw
him again . Upon meeting they had a picture taken together sitting
next to each other. That picture graces the cover of my first book.

I did not answer Mohammad but I wondered instead, “how many book
covers will we need to place the pictures of such Islamized Armenians?”

We met Mehran Hekimian or Mohammad Mahamed through his nephew Dr. Garo
in Mohammad”s house in Ras al Ein on May 20, 2009.

http://www.horizonweekly.ca/news/details/34163

Deputy Premier Cheated Us, Say Angered Villagers

DEPUTY PREMIER CHEATED US, SAY ANGERED VILLAGERS

18:01 | March 14,2014 | Social

Residents of the five communities of Aragatsotn region who blocked the
main highway to Yerevan last week in protest against the construction
of a hydroelectric plant in the region, today gathered in Ohanavan
village where they were to meet Deputy Prime Minister Armen Gevorgyan.

“He [Armen Gevorgyan] agreed to meet us today but has not showed up
for the appointment. We have been waiting since early morning. They
cheated us. In despair, we went to block the highway again but the
local police told us that the meeting would be held on Monday,”
said Vardan Poghosyan, a villager of Ohanavan.

The group is determined to continue protests in Yerevan if the relevant
bodies fail to attend the problem.

The angered villagers say that the construction of the hydroelectric
plant on the reservoir will deprive them of their livelihoods. They
claim that they live off 1500 hectare apple groves dependent on
irrigation water coming from the reservoir.

http://en.a1plus.am/1184509.html

Ex-Armenian Health Minister Appointed Health Minister Of Karabakh

EX-ARMENIAN HEALTH MINISTER APPOINTED HEALTH MINISTER OF KARABAKH

YEREVAN, March 14. / ARKA /. Former health minister of Armenia,
Harutyun Kushkyan, was appointed as health minister of Nagorno-Karabakh
Republic (NKR).

A corresponding decree was signed by NKR president Bako Sahakyan
on Friday, the latter’s press office said. Kushkyan has replaced
Zoya Lazaryan.

Harutyun Kushkyan served as Armenia’s health minister from 2007 to
2012. He was replaced by Derenik Dumanyan. -0-

– See more at:

http://arka.am/en/news/society/ex_armenian_health_minister_appointed_health_minister_of_karabakh_/#sthash.DzvD7j3g.dpuf

Switzerland Appeals European Human Rights Court Ruling

SWITZERLAND APPEALS EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS COURT RULING

Legal Monitor Worldwide
March 12, 2014 Wednesday

The government of Switzerland announced Tuesday that it will appeal
a December 17, 2013 decision by the European Court of Human Rights
overturning the conviction of Dogu Perincek for denying the Armenian
Genocide, Asbarez reports.

The decision was made by Switzerland’s Federal Office of Justice, which
is asking the ECHR Grand Chamber to review the ruling to clarify the
scope available to Swiss authorities in applying the Swiss Criminal
Code to combat racism. Switzerland created this penal provision,
which entered into force in 1995, to close loopholes in its criminal
law and enable the country to accede to the UN Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.

“We welcome the Swiss Government’s decision to request that the
December 17 decision of the European Court of Human Rights be referred
to the Grand Chamber for review. By this decision Switzerland is
attempting to defend its own legislation, while at the same time
is adhering to the expectation of all Armenians to appeal the ECHR
December 17 ruling, in order to create the opportunity to rectify the
contentious assertions about the Armenian Genocide in that ruling. Of
course, this process has several more stages to pass, first of which
would be the decision by the Grand Chamber on whether or not to
accept the referral,” said a statement on the Armenian Revolutionary
Federation Political Affairs office.

This is an issue which requires pan-national consensus and the
necessity to push for the rectification of the contentious assertions
about the Armenian Genocide in the ECHR ruling,” added the ARF
statement.

Under the provisions of the Swiss law, in 2007, Turkish citizen Dogu
Perincek was convicted for denying the Armenian Genocide. Failing to
win two appeals against the judgment, Perincek appealed the ECHR,
which on Dec. 17 ruled that the Swiss courts’ rulings violated the
appellant’s right to freedom of expression.

The ECHR ruling stated that “the free exercise of the right to openly
discuss questions of a sensitive and controversial nature is one of
the fundamental aspects of freedom of expression and distinguishes
a tolerant and pluralistic democratic society from a totalitarian or
dictatorial regime.”

The original case emerged from Perincek’s participation in a number
of conferences in Switzerland in 2005, during which he publicly denied
that the Ottoman Empire had perpetrated the crime of genocide against
the Armenian people in 1915.

The Lausanne Police Court found Perincek guilty of racial
discrimination on March 9, 2007, based on the Swiss Criminal Code.

After a complaint filed by the Switzerland-Armenia Association on
July 15, 2005, the court found that Perincek’s motives were of a
“racist tendency” and did not contribute to the historical debate.

“The Court underlined that the free exercise of the right to openly
discuss questions of a sensitive and controversial nature was one of
the fundamental aspects of freedom of expression and distinguished
a tolerant and pluralistic democratic society from a totalitarian or
dictatorial regime,” said the official ECHR press release at the time.

“The Court also pointed out that it was not called upon to rule on the
legal characterization of the Armenian genocide. The existence of a
‘genocide,’ which was a precisely defined legal concept, was not easy
to prove. The Court doubted that there could be a general consensus
as to events such as those at issue, given that historical research
was by definition open to discussion and a matter of debate, without
necessarily giving rise to final conclusions or to the assertion of
objective and absolute truths,” added the ECHR release.

“Lastly, the Court observed that those States which had officially
recognized the Armenian genocide had not found it necessary to enact
laws imposing criminal sanctions on individuals questioning the
official view, being mindful that one of the main goals of freedom of
expression was to protect minority views capable of contributing to a
debate on questions of general interest which were not fully settled,”
explained the ECHR.

Since the ECHR ruling, many leading Armenian organizations around the
world, including the Armenian National Committee offices in Europe,
South America, Australia and elsewhere met with Swiss diplomats
urging the Swiss government to appeal the ECHR ruling.© 2014 Legal
Monitor Worldwide.

Charents’s ‘Book Of Relics’ Deposited With Poet’s Museum

CHARENTS’S ‘BOOK OF RELICS’ DEPOSITED WITH POET’S MUSEUM

21:45 * 13.03.14

The Book of Relics, the latest published literary collection
by Yeghishe Chrents, is kept in the poet’s house museum, his
grand-daughter has said, dismissing the reports that the book is
under lien.

“The edition is not under lien. It has been deposited with the Charents
Museum, because both the preface and the entire book itself contained
numerous mistakes when being compiled,” Gohar Charents told Tert.am
on Thursday.

The book, which contains intimate poems, was published in Armenia
in 2012.

Charents’s granddaughter said she is against the book not only because
of the mistakes but also because its publication violates the poet’s
authorship rights.

“The Ministry of Culture banned the book, so it is now in the museum
where it will be kept,” she added.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2014/03/13/gasparyan-charenc/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAZBHjr6DdQ

Residents Cheated By Tonus Developer Confident That Armenian Authori

RESIDENTS CHEATED BY TONUS DEVELOPER CONFIDENT THAT ARMENIAN AUTHORITIES ARE BUYING TIME

03.13.2014 18:05 epress.am

Yerevan residents deceived by developer company Tonus LLC have no
expectations from their meeting with head of the RA Presidential
Oversight Service Hovhannes Hovsepyan, which took place yesterday after
their protest outside the president’s mansion. One of the residents,
Zoya Petrosyan, assured Epress.am that nothing new was said at the
meeting: “The [same] old topics which have been discussed for about
a year were beaten to death.”

“We’ve talked about the same things so much that we’re sick and
tired of this tense situation. Hovsepyan said only one thing: he
asked for one month’s time supposedly to solve the matter, but I don’t
particularly understand this. If they haven’t done anything in a year,
what are they going to do in a month? Neither party said anything
encouraging; at least if we were somewhat inspired — we came home,
again cheated,” she said.

Petrosyan believes the authorities will do everything possible to buy
time, one month will turn into one year, then years, and nothing will
change. “In 10-15 days, I’ll go to Hovsepyan, see that he wanted one
month’s time, so what has he done in 15 days? If he says, there is
no news, then they’re deceiving us again,” she said, adding only the
president of the country can solve the matter.

Recall, Tonus developer company belongs to Prosperous Armenia Party
member Ashot Tonoyan. Residents are asking to receive the apartments
they legally purchased from Tonus.

In 2006, 140 families signed preliminary contracts for the purchase and
sale of real estate with Tonus Construction and made regular payments
to purchase the apartments. But the new homeowners soon learned that
they have no rights to the apartments since the building is in trust
as an escrow to Artsakhbank.

http://www.epress.am/en/2014/03/13/residents-cheated-by-tonus-developer-confident-that-armenian-authorities-are-buying-time.html