Aharon Adibekyan: Tigran Sargsyan stepped down as PM for his deep di

Aharon Adibekyan: Tigran Sargsyan stepped down as prime minister for
his deep disappointment

by Karina Manukyan

Saturday, April 5, 13:31

It was a strong sense of disappointment that made Tigran Sargsyan to
step down as prime minister, Aharon Adibekyan, the head of Sociometer
Sociological Center, told reporters on 5 April.

According to him, Sargsyan’s efforts to develop Armenia were
underestimated, due in no small part to the mandatory accumulative
pension system that has sparked public outrage. The Constitution
Court did not avoid troubles either, Adibekyan said. According to him,
the CC should have adopted its verdict on the pension reform building
on the ‘breath and soul’ of the law on the mandatory accumulative
component and not from the viewpoint of the legal language.
In fact, Sargsyan was disappointed to see that his good intentions are
not understood. “He was hit in his pride. As a man respecting himself,
he could not but leave,” Adibekyan said.

The sociologist thinks there is no such highly professional financier
in Armenia as Sargsyan. Adibekyan sees no one among ‘political stars’
to be able to fulfill the responsibilities of the prime minister.

“We need a prime minister that would have personal ties with
international financial society and our strategic partners, mainly
with Russia,” Adibekyan said.
As for the rumors that the ex-president Robert Kocharyan may be
appointed as the prime minister, Adibekyan said there were some
positive developments in the country under Kocharyan, but the economic
activity of his family cast shadow on him.

To recall, on April 3 Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan stepped
down during the meeting of the Supreme Body of the Republican Party of
Armenia. President Serzh Sargsyan has accepted the resignation. In
compliance with Article 55 of the Constitution of the Republic of
Armenia, President Serzh Sargsyan is to appoint a new prime minister
within 10 days. Afterwards, the new staff of the Government will be
formed within 20 days. All the ministers automatically become acting
ministers before the new premier is appointed.

by Karina Manukyan

Saturday, April 5, 13:31

It was a strong sense of disappointment that made Tigran Sargsyan to
step down as prime minister, Aharon Adibekyan, the head of Sociometer
Sociological Center, told reporters on 5 April.

According to him, Sargsyan’s efforts to develop Armenia were
underestimated, due in no small part to the mandatory accumulative
pension system that has sparked public outrage. The Constitution
Court did not avoid troubles either, Adibekyan said. According to him,
the CC should have adopted its verdict on the pension reform building
on the ‘breath and soul’ of the law on the mandatory accumulative
component and not from the viewpoint of the legal language.
In fact, Sargsyan was disappointed to see that his good intentions are
not understood. “He was hit in his pride. As a man respecting himself,
he could not but leave,” Adibekyan said.

The sociologist thinks there is no such highly professional financier
in Armenia as Sargsyan. Adibekyan sees no one among ‘political stars’
to be able to fulfill the responsibilities of the prime minister.

“We need a prime minister that would have personal ties with
international financial society and our strategic partners, mainly
with Russia,” Adibekyan said.
As for the rumors that the ex-president Robert Kocharyan may be
appointed as the prime minister, Adibekyan said there were some
positive developments in the country under Kocharyan, but the economic
activity of his family cast shadow on him.

To recall, on April 3 Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan stepped
down during the meeting of the Supreme Body of the Republican Party of
Armenia. President Serzh Sargsyan has accepted the resignation. In
compliance with Article 55 of the Constitution of the Republic of
Armenia, President Serzh Sargsyan is to appoint a new prime minister
within 10 days. Afterwards, the new staff of the Government will be
formed within 20 days. All the ministers automatically become acting
ministers before the new premier is appointed.

http://www.arminfo.am/index.cfm?objectid=0EA35DE0-BCA5-11E3-BB300EB7C0D21663

Armenia parliament leader to become next PM?

Zhoghovurd : Armenia parliament leader to become next PM?

April 05, 2014

YEREVAN. – The number one matter being discussed in Armenia these days
is that of the country’s next prime minister, Zhoghovurd daily
reported.

“According to Zhoghovurd’s information, the [respective] appointment
will be made next week.

“As for the candidates, three names were being circulated yesterday
[Friday]: Presidential Chief of Staff Vigen Sargsyan, former [capital
city] Yerevan Mayor Karen Karapetyan, and NA [National Assembly]
Speaker Hovik Abrahamyan.

“According to the news being circulated in the backstage of the
authorities, Abrahamyan’s appointment is the most likely, at present.

“Furthermore, as Zhoghovurd learned from its parliamentary sources,
Abrahamyan already has started preparing his teammates to going to the
government.

“Those close to the NA speaker were regulating–still, on their
head–the matters of furnishing the government, provided they would not
be disappointed this time, too,” Zhoghovurd wrote.

Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan on Thursday offered his resignation to
President Serzh Sargsyan, and the President accepted the PM’s
resignation.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

Sophie Audouin-Mamikonian au salon du livre de Bondues : la maman de

REVUE DE PRESSE
Sophie Audouin-Mamikonian au salon du livre de Bondues : la maman de
Tara Duncan, c’est elle !

Elle a un titre de noblesse (Son Altesse Royale la Princesse) et une
vingtaine de titres de romans à son actif. Sophie Audouin-Mamikonian,
qui signe les sagas Tara Duncan et Indiana Teller est, à n’en pas
douter, l’une des auteures chouchous des ados (mais pas seulement). Ce
samedi, elle sera au salon du livre de Bondues dont elle est l’une des
invitées d’honneur, mais aussi la marraine du concours littéraire des
collèges. Elle évoque pour nous, avec son petit grain de folie
habituel, son parcours, ses projets, et son amour de l’écriture.

> : forcément, ça interpelle…

>

Quelle est son histoire ?

>

Pensez-vous que cette histoire familiale ait influencé votre façon d’être ?

>

Vous avez attendu dix-sept ans avant que le premier tome de Tara
Duncan soit publié…

>

>, >, > : de
gros livres, et des séries. Vous avez du mal à voir les choses en
petit ?

>

Pas possible…

Et pourquoi pas chez nous ?

>

Pour passer au grand écran, vous avez dû mettre la pédale douce ?

>

Vous écrivez pour les ados et les adultes : faites-vous une
différence ? Écrire pour les jeunes, ce n’est pas brader son écriture.

>

Vous avez conscience que vous amenez beaucoup de jeunes à la lecture
et à l’écriture ?

?

>, éd. Michel Lafon, 380 p., 17,20 EURO

samedi 5 avril 2014,
Stéphane (c)armenews.com

http://www.nordeclair.fr/info-locale/sophie-audouin-mamikonian-au-salon-du-livre-de-bondues-la-jna446b0n387754
http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=98560

Le nouveau sélectionneur arménien Bernard Challandes sur le départ ?

FOOTBALL-EQUIPE NATIONALE D’ARMENIE
Le nouveau sélectionneur arménien Bernard Challandes sur le départ ?

Arrivé à la tête de la sélection nationale d’Arménie le 28 février
dernier, le Suisse Bernard Challandes s’apprête déjà à rompre son
contrat avec la Fédération arménienne de Football. Des sources
moscovites affirment que le nouvel entraineur national d’Arménie
pourrait être recruté par le > Moscou qui se trouve privé
d’entraîneur après la démission de Valéri Karpine. Leonid Fedoun, le
riche propriétaire du > aurait proposé un montant important
à Bernard Challandes pour cette fonction d’entraineur à la tête du
club moscovite où évoluent les deux internationaux arméniens Yura
Movsissian et Araz Ozbiliz. Vartan Minassian qui avait démissionné en
fin d’année dernière de son poste de sélectionneur de l’équipe
d’Arménie pourrait -dit-on- revenir pour reprendre l’équipe nationale
arménienne.

Krikor Amirzayan

samedi 5 avril 2014,
Krikor Amirzayan (c)armenews.com

Genocide Recognition Billboards Displayed in Boston Streets

Genocide Recognition Billboards Displayed in Boston Streets

Saturday, April 5th, 2014

A billboard in Boston

BOSTON-During the month of April, the 2014 Armenian Genocide commemorative
billboards will be displayed at the corner of Arsenal and School Streets in
Watertown; on Cambridge Street, at the Lechmere Station in Cambridge; and
on Route 1 South, 1/4 mile from the Gillette Stadium, in Foxboro.

Sponsored by Peace of Art, Inc., , the 2014 Armenian
Genocide commemorative billboards honor the victims and survivors of the
Armenian Genocide. In this year’s message “Recognize the Crime of the
Century, the Armenian Genocide,” the word ‘genocide’ has imbedded the
number 100, and handcuffs. The number 100 refers to the approaching 100th
anniversary of the Armenian Genocide. The handcuffs refer to a century of
victimization and denial by the perpetrators of the Armenian Genocide and
their supporters. The Armenian Genocide was the crime of the century
because it was the first genocide of the 20th century. Had the genocide
been condemned by the world community, the governments that followed most
likely would not have used genocide as the means to eliminate unwanted
groups of their populations segregated by race, religion or ethnicity.

Millions of people around the world have been killed, victims of genocide,
for political motives, and ethnic cleansing. Since the Armenian genocide
took place in the beginning of the 20th century, genocide has become an
effective tool of war, to eliminate unwanted sectors of the population
segregated by race, or religion, or ethnicity. As the Armenian people
struggle for recognition of the crime of the century, the world remains
‘blind’ to crimes against humanity perpetrated around the globe. The world
community must recognize the Armenian genocide and condemn such crimes
against humanity.

Since 2003, through the annual commemorative billboards, Peace of Art,
Inc., has been calling for the recognition of the
Armenian Genocide, and it has urged the community at large, the President
of the United States, and the United Nations to recognize the Armenian
Genocide. It is time to urge Turkey to recognize the Armenian Genocide, and
to make amends.

“To deny the Armenian Genocide is to further victimize those who perished
and their descendants, it is an act of blaming the victims. After a century
of denial, it is time to place the ‘handcuffs’ on the criminals. For those
who think that after the last survivor dies there will be no more
witnesses, and with the passing of time the Armenian genocide will be
forgotten, know that all Armenians are survivors of the genocide, and as
long as the Armenian genocide remains unrecognized by Turkey, millions of
Armenians around the world will demand recognition and justice.” Said the
president of Peace of Art, Inc., Daniel Varoujan Hejinian.

http://asbarez.com/121570/genocide-recognition-billboards-displayed-in-boston-streets/
www.PeaceofArt.org
www.PeaceofArt.org

BAKU: Turkey-Azerbaijan Relations Exceptional

TURKEY-AZERBAIJAN RELATIONS EXCEPTIONAL

Trend, Azerbaijan
April 4 2014

Baku, Azerbaijan, April 4

By Rufiz Hafizoglu -Trend:

The relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan are exceptional, Turkish
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan told media before his visit to
Baku on April 4.

“The Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, as well as the
largest projects being implemented by the two countries in the region
will be discussed during the meetings in Baku,” he added.

Erdogan also said that the upcoming visit to Azerbaijan will contribute
to consolidating and strengthening the Turkish- Azerbaijani relations.

“The relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan are an example for
the whole world and the two countries are strategic partners,”
Erdogan said.

“Turkey and Azerbaijan are implementing very important economic
projects in the region, including the Baku- Tbilisi-Kars railway, the
Baku-Tbilisi -Ceyhan oil pipeline, as well as TANAP project,” he said.

“These projects are not only regional but also international in
nature,” he said.

The TANAP project envisages gas transportation from the Shah Deniz
field to Europe via Turkey. The pipeline’s initial capacity is expected
to reach 16 billion cubic meters per year.

Around six billion cubic meters will be delivered to Turkey and the
rest to Europe. In the future, the pipeline capacity can be expanded
to 31 billion cubic meters of gas per year.

There are plans to construct a new 105 kilometer branch of the
railway as part of the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars project. Moreover, the
Akhalkalaki-Tbilisi-Marabda railway section in Georgia will be
reconstructed. This will increase its capacity to 15 million tons
of cargo per year. There are also plans to construct a station for
trains passing from the existing tracks in Georgia to the European one.

The peak capacity of the corridor will be 17 million tons of cargo
per year. This figure will be at the level of one million passengers
and 6.5 million tons of cargo at the initial stage.

Romania, Armenia Planning Cooperation On Agricultural Trade Exchange

ROMANIA, ARMENIA PLANNING COOPERATION ON AGRICULTURAL TRADE EXCHANGES

ACTmedia, EU
April 4 2014

Friday, April 4, 2014

Romania and Armenia will cooperate on agricultural trade exchanges and
an Armenian technical team will soon come to Bucharest to determine the
specific areas of cooperation between the two countries, the Ministry
of Agriculture and Rural Development (MADR) said in Thursday release.

The decision was made following the meeting MADR Secretary of State
George Octavian Turtoi had with counterpart Armen Harutyunyan,
Armenia’s Deputy Minister of Agriculture, during the FAO Regional
Conference in Bucharest.

The Armenian party expressed interest in strengthening cooperation
between the two countries by developing experience exchanges in
fruit growing, agricultural consultancy services, forestry, as well
as expertise swaps on the management of European funds.

Romania voiced interest in developing relations with Armenia in
agriculture and rural development by providing the necessary expertise
in agriculture, as well as in the management of European and national
financial instruments.

Moreover, the sides agreed that in the future, an Armenian technical
team should come to Bucharest to establish the specific areas of
cooperation.

As concerns the situation of agricultural trade, Romania expressed
readiness to supply the Armenian market with high quality food.

According to official data, in 2012, Romania – Armenia trade exchanges
stood at 7.87 million US dollars, of which Romanian exports to Armenia
stood at 7.25 million dollars and imports from Armenia to Romania
at 0.62 million dollars; with a surplus of 6.63 million dollars,
Romania was thus running a favorable balance.

Expressed in percentage shares, in 2012 the total amount of bilateral
trade fell 16 percent from 2011, with exports sliding 18 percent and
imports advancing 17 percent.

Over Jan – April 2013 trade exchanges saw a rise by 6.2 percent y-o-y,
with exports growing 14.6 percent and imports dropping 93.3 percent.

http://actmedia.eu/daily/romania-armenia-planning-cooperation-on-agricultural-trade-exchanges/51468

ANKARA: US Senate To Vote On Armenian ‘Genocide’ Draft

US SENATE TO VOTE ON ARMENIAN ‘GENOCIDE’ DRAFT

World Bulletin, Turkey
April 4 2014

The draft presented by Senate Foreign Affairs Committee chief Robert
Menendez and Republican Senator Mark Kirk aims to label the death of
Armenians during the war as a ‘genocide’.

World Bulletin / News Desk

The Armenian lobby in the US have presented the US Senate with a
draft decision backing their version of events in the Turkish-Armenian
clashes in 1915.

The draft presented by Senate Foreign Affairs Committee chief Robert
Menendez and Republican Senator Mark Kirk aims to label the death of
Armenians during the war as a ‘genocide’.

Democrat Senetors Barbara Boxer and Ed Markey are among those to pen
their names to the draft, which must now be voted on by the Senate.

Then, with the approval of the Democrat majority leader Harry Reid, the
draft may be brought to the attention of the Senate’s General Assembly.

However, even if the draft is accepted, it will no be binding.

http://www.worldbulletin.net/news/132887/us-senate-to-vote-on-armenian-genocide-draft

The New Cold War

THE NEW COLD WAR

The Moscow Times
April 4 2014

By Robert Legvold

Russia and the West entered February surrounded by uncertainty —
frustrated and angry with the other side but still ready to explore an
admittedly fraught path forward. They exited March unexpectedly locked
in a new cold war, the ambiguity gone, and the other side transformed
into an undisputed adversary with plans underway to deal with it as
such. Russian aggression sent them reeling into this other world,
but over the years they had prepared the way together.

The new cold war will be between Russia and the West, not an
international affair, but it will affect the entire global arena.

The new cold war will be different from the original. It will be a cold
war between Russia and the West, not a global affair, though it will
profoundly affect the entire international political system. It will
not have the last one’s ideological impulse, although the political
animus now congealing will substitute. And it — let’s hope — will
not play out under the dense shadow of nuclear Armageddon.

Some will add that, unlike the original Cold War, it also will not
really matter, given Russia’s fundamental weaknesses and relative
insignificance compared with a surging China and the scale of other
challenges facing the U.S.

They are wrong.

Dealing with the -Russia-West relationship in fundamentally adversarial
terms will contaminate nearly every critical dimension of international
politics, seriously warp U.S. and Russian foreign policy and exact
a heavy price in lost opportunities.

Rather than redefine NATO to better address new security challenges,
the old NATO will be reinforced and pressed closer to Russia’s
borders. Despite its economic limitations, Russia will answer in kind.

Defense planning in Washington and Moscow, which were both in
the process of adjusting to more modern, 21st-century threats with
diminished resources, will come under irresistible pressure to spend on
old threats that are driven by fears copied from the original Cold War.

Any thought of salvaging a crumbling arms control regime in Europe,
reducing tactical nuclear weapons, cooperating on missile defense
or taking the next steps in controlling strategic nuclear weapons —
let alone, the first steps toward managing an increasingly unstable
multipolar nuclear world — now becomes pure fantasy.

Russia-West energy relations, vexed but key to the global energy
economy, will take on an unadulterated geo-strategic dimension.

Violence, when it erupts, say, between Armenia and Azerbaijan over
Nagorno-Karabakh, in Central Asia or, worse, in Ukraine will tempt
nervous adversaries to intervene against one another rather than work
with one another to contain it. Dealing with vast new challenges,
such as the rise of China, will be done competitively rather than
cooperatively.

In the face of this new reality and given its immense costs, the
overriding guideline for U.S. and Russian policy should be to make
the new Russia-West cold war as short and shallow as possible. The
pressures on both sides, however, push in the opposite direction. In
the U.S., the tendency will be to rest policy on regime change —
that is, only when President Vladimir Putin is gone can we hope to
build a different relationship with Russia — rather than aim for
a change in regime behavior. In Russia, the tendency already is to
give up on the U.S. and its European allies and focus on rallying
others to a jaundiced view of where Western policy is taking the
world. In a throwback to the original Cold War, the emphasis on both
sides will be on “winning this new contest” rather than on managing,
then defusing and ultimately surmounting it.

In the mature, later phases of the original Cold War, management,
rather than victory, came to dominate, and elements of cooperation —
the 1968 Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Strategic Arms Limitations
Treaties in the 1970s, the space station and the reunification of
German in 1990 — merged with moments of dangerous tension, such as
the 1973 Yom Kippur War, turmoil in the Horn of Africa and the Soviet
invasion of Afghanistan. And then it was over.

Success for the U.S. blended credible strength with a readiness to
engage. It also depended on the growing realization that mistrust
between the two sides mattered as much as the other side’s malevolence;
that the pathologies in their interaction contributed as much as the
pathology in the nature of the other side; and that Soviet behavior
was more determined by events than by predetermined plans or genetic
code. In the end, U.S. policy was wiser in shaping events than in
trying to shape Soviet character.

Sad as it is, we are arriving at this point because Russia and the
West wasted the “peace dividend” that was awarded to them by the end
of the original Cold War, only to have to learn again the lessons of
that costly rivalry.

Robert Legvold is Marshall D. Shulman Professor Emeritus of Political
Science at Columbia University and author of “Russian Foreign Policy
in the 21st Century and the Shadow of the Past.”

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/the-new-cold-war/497466.html

Georgia, Armenia And Azerbaijan Agree To Form Transcaucasian Confede

GEORGIA, ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN AGREE TO FORM TRANSCAUCASIAN CONFEDERATION BY 2019

Georgia Today, Georgia
April 4 2014

1 April, 2014. The ISET Economist was invited to attend the signing
ceremony concluding the last round of trilateral negotiations held in
Geneva under the joint sponsorship of the Swiss Confederation, the US,
Russia and Turkey. The three countries, represented by heads of states,
agreed to join the newly created Transcaucasian Confederation and thus
bring peace and a promise of prosperity to a deeply divided region
that has provided the setting for yet another round in the Great
Game – the battle between Russia and Western powers for political
and ideological hegemony in Central Asia and South Caucasus; control
over strategic trade routes (the traditional Silk Road); and access
to the vast natural resources of the Caspian basin.

The agreement, carrying the signatures of Ilham Aliev, Serge Sarksyan
and Irakli Gharibashvili, charts the political and economic contours
of the future Transcaucasian Confederation (TC). It also envisions
a series of shorter-term confidence-building measures seeking to
dissolve existing political tensions, open borders, and normalize
economic and cultural relations between the three neighboring nations.

The agreement consists of ten points outlining the main principles
of the future economic, social and political arrangements:

1. Borders. The parties agree to eliminate state borders and any
other internal barriers to the movement of goods, physical persons
and capital on the territory of the newly formed Transcaucasian
Confederation (TC). Follow up negotiations with South Ossetia and
Abkhazia will be conducted in Moscow and Istanbul to agree on a set of
confidence-building measures such as direct dialog and the resumption
of trade, transport and tourism linkages, eventually leading to the
elimination of borders between TC and these territories.

2. Territorial conflicts. Currently disputed territories, such as
Nagorno-Karabakh, will be assigned the status of autonomous tax
free zones exempting their residents (legal and physical persons)
from any taxes levied by the Armenian, Azeri and Georgian cantons. A
similar status will be granted to South Ossetia and Abkhazia should
they decide to join TC at a later time.

3. Political arrangements.

a. Modeled after the Swiss Confederation, TC will be governed by the
Federal Council, serving as collective Head of State. It will be a
collegial body of 7 members (three representing Azerbaijan and two the
Georgian and Armenian cantons, each). As a compromise between Georgia
and Azerbaijan, membership in the Federal Council will be limited to
three consecutive terms, candidates must have attained the age of forty
to be elected, and would not be allowed to serve past the age of 65.

b. The President of the Confederation will be elected by the Federal
Assembly from among the seven members, in rotation and for a one-year
term; the President chairs the government and assumes representative
functions. However, the President will be a primus inter pares with
no additional powers.

c. TC Parliament will consist of two houses: the Senate with equal
representation for each canton and autonomous region; and Congress
elected under a system of proportional representation. When both
houses are in joint session, they will be known collectively as the
Federal Assembly.

4. Neutrality. TC will adhere to the principles of military and
political neutrality and will not join the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization, the European Union, the Eurasian Union or any other
military or political bloc.

5. International trade and transit. TC will simultaneously seek
deep and comprehensive trade liberalization agreements with the EU,
the Eurasian Union, Turkey, Iran, Kazakhstan and other Central Asian
countries. Punitive transit fees will be applied on goods originating
in countries imposing tariff and non-tariff restrictions on trade
with TC.

6. Collective investment in and, ownership of, rail and road transport,
pipelines and electricity transmission infrastructure. The parties
recognize the vast opportunity for TC in restoring the role of the
traditional Silk Road route linking Central Asia to the Black Sea and
Europe, on the one hand, and forging North-South transport, trade and
energy links between Russia and Turkey, on the other. To expedite
the necessary investment in transport, pipeline and electricity
transmission infrastructure, the parties agree to the principle of
joint investment, collective ownership, building, and operation of
all existing infrastructure.

7. Capping military spending and promoting inclusive growth. The
creation of TC brings to an end a series of frozen conflicts
undermining regional security, threatening investors’ property rights
and slowing down economic development. In recognition of the above
and to address pressing social challenges, the parties agree to cap
military expenditures at 3% of TC’s combined gross domestic product
(GDP). An aggressive “military conversion” plan will be implemented
over the next five years (until 2019) to retrain former military
personnel for suitable civic occupations (e.g. drivers of tanks and
armored vehicles will be trained in the operation of tractors and
other types of heavy agricultural and construction machinery). Every
dollar saved in military expenditures will be used to promote inclusive
growth and reduce inequality.

8. Economic specialization. TC will promote regional specialization
corresponding to the natural comparative advantages of its constituent
parts. The Azerbaijani canton will mainly specialize in agriculture and
fuel production; TC’s manufacturing base will be established in the
Armenian canton. The Georgian canton will be tasked with maintaining
law &order and hospitality services. The parties realize the risk of
picking the wrong specializations such as making Armenians responsible
for fuel production; leaving law and order in the Azeri hands; and/or
counting on Georgian males to man assembly lines.

9. The teaching of history. To stop arguing whose ancestors were the
first to populate this or that hill, whose poetry had greater impact
on the world literature, and which nation was the first to adopt
a monotheistic religion, the parties agree to a joint rewriting
of regional history textbooks. In particular, the most important
technological and cultural achievements will be randomly assigned to
prominent historical figures representing the various ethnic groups
populating the region since times immemorial. As a gesture of good
will, Georgia agrees to rename “Homo Erectus Georgicus” to “Homo
Erectus Caucasicus”. Conversely, all great follies and attempts at
ethnic cleansing will be non-randomly assigned to villains of unclear
ethnic descent who shall be branded as “ultra-nationalist fascists”
and demonized.

10. Official languages, anthem, and national symbols. The three
cantons will pull their resources to construct the world’s largest
Alphabet Tower featuring all three national alphabets at the
intersection of the three national state borders. The three main
languages of the region will be given the status of state languages
and will be taught in all cantons. Nomination to any civil service
position will be conditioned on Google Translate-assisted fluency
in all three languages. TC’s anthem will include three verses, one
in each language, to be performed in a randomly assigned order. The
anthem will have as its general theme a famous aphorism by Aristotle:
“the whole is greater than the sum of its parts”.

Speaking to journalists after the signing ceremony held at
Geneva’s Grand Kempinski hotel, the three leaders explained that
the breakthrough in negotiations (which have been slowly progressing
behind the scenes since November 2012) was triggered by the recent
crisis in Ukraine. The political and military confrontation in Ukraine
provided a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for countries along the
Caucasus Transport Corridor (CTC) to attract investment and compete
with alternative trade routes via Ukrainian and Russian ports on the
Black Sea and via the Baltic ports and Russia to Central Asia. The only
way to act on this opportunity was to make peace. “And since peace
was blocked by disagreement about (arbitrary) border lines we had to
think out of the box and eliminate the root cause of the conflict –
the borders”, concluded Ilham Aliev.

* This blog was dedicated to April Fools’ Day.

By ISET Economist’s special correspondent in Geneva, Eric Livny

4.04.2014gr

http://www.georgiatoday.ge/article_details.php?id=12084