Turkey’s foreign policy subject of panel discussion at IWP

US Official News
December 29, 2014 Monday

Turkey’s foreign policy subject of panel discussion at IWP

Washington

INSTITUTE OF WORLD POLITICS has issued the following news release:

The Institute of World Politics hosted a panel of experts to debate
Turkey’s evolving geopolitical role, both with regards to the
country’s aggressive action in the Mediterranean and Ankara’s posture
towards Kurdish minorities, as well as the Erdogan government’s
failure to normalize relations with Armenia without preconditions. In
essence going from a stated policy of “zero problems with neighbors”
to “zero ties with neighbors.”

Haykaram Nahapetyan (Journalist, researcher, and correspondent of the
Public TV Company of Armenia to the U.S.), Zendy Zemenides (Executive
Director of the Hellenic American Leadership Council) and Mehmet
Yuksel (Representative of the People’s Democratic Party to the U.S.)
all contended that the United States must express a higher level of
disapproval towards Turkey’s regional activities.

Such activities from the Turkish government include unwarranted
military action against the island of Cyprus, an economic development
zone that exaggerates Turkey’s allocated maritime boundaries, and a
hostile stance toward the Kurdish community. Moreover, the speakers
noted, the continued denial of the Armenian Genocide on the threshold
of its 100th anniversary in April 2015 shows that Ankara is not
willing to recognize this crime against humanity and provide adequate
restitution to the Armenian nation. These actions are all taking place
within a country that continues to enjoy membership in NATO, has
lobbied for a seat on the United Nations Security Council, and has
shown aspirations of joining the European Union.

In their closing statements, when asked to describe Turkey’s future in
2015 with a single word, the panelists responded with “convoluted,”
“volatile,” and “difficult.”

The panel was hosted by Vilen Khlgatyan, an alumnus of IWP and Vice
Chairman of the Political Developments Research Center (PDRC), a think
tank based in Yerevan, Armenia.

L’inflation en Arménie incompatible avec la dépréciation de la monna

ARMENIE
L’inflation en Arménie incompatible avec la dépréciation de la monnaie

Les prétentions du gouvernement arménien que l’inflation de décembre a
été conditionnée par la dévaluation du dram n’est pas vrai a déclaré
l’économiste Bagrat Asatryan.

L’ancien gouverneur de la Banque centrale estime qu’il n’y a pas de
corrélation directe entre la dévaluation de la monnaie nationale et
l’inflation, bien que l’Arménie soit surtout un pays importateur et,
naturellement, il ne est pas possible d’éviter l’inflation.

“Il y a une dépendance mais ce n’est rien, si l’on compte sur la base
de l’évolution actuelle, puis l’inflation aurait du être que de 0,3 à
0,5 pour cent. Il n’y a pas de corrélation directe ; tout simplement
en Arménie la politique des prix ne est pas efficace. Le prix du gaz
n’a pas encore augmenté, et c’est ce qui affecte la formation des prix
“, a déclaré Bagrat Asatryan.

Soulignant que la méfiance envers le gouvernement est la principale
cause de la dévaluation drastique du dram et la panique et la
principale cause de la situation économique qui a suivi, l’économiste
a dit qu’il était possible d’éviter cette situation si le gouvernement
a mis en oeuvre une politique correcte.

“Ils disent que les bureaux de change ont fait des spéculations, mais
ils sont faits exactement pour cela. Ils doivent sortir d’un tel
niveau de débat et avoir l’éthique du travail et prendre des décisions
concernant le système financier, ils doivent faire rendre les
problèmes publics et réfléchir à leurs solutions >>, a déclaré Bagrat
Asatryan.

“Les approches et les décisions pour la stabilisation du système
financier sont importantes, et la Banque centrale a ce potentiel >>, a
déclaré Bagrat Asatryan. “La politique mise en oeuvre au cours de la
dévaluation du dram a été le résultat de la pression politique.”

Ani, The Mighty Armenian Capital of One Thousand and One Churches

Ani, The Mighty Armenian Capital of One Thousand and One Churches

Wednesday, December 31st, 2014 | Posted by Matthew Karanian

The silhouette of the Chapel of Soorp Grigor makes a solitary stand at
the Armenian capital of Ani. Photo (c) 2014 Matthew Karanian, Reprinted
with Permission.

BY MATTHEW KARANIAN

Ani is the fabled city of one thousand-and-one churches and the
capital of a once-mighty Armenian kingdom. The city flourished during
an Armenian silver age that lasted for about a century beginning in AD
961.

For the past three hundred fifty years, however, the city has been
largely abandoned, and it has been completely uninhabited for the past
century. Many people today call Ani a ghost town. For Armenians,
however, the city is alive. There is no place else in the world with a
greater concentration of Armenian churches and artifacts than within
the walls of Ani.

The remains of the city’s massive walls, stately arches, and carved
domes “testify to the audacity of the people who built this place,”
wrote the New York Times in a cover travel story that was published
shortly after Turkey first eased its ban on travel to Ani. The Times
celebrated Ani, without equivocation, as an Armenian capital.

Ani sits directly on the current border between Armenia and Turkey and
is located within the region of Kars on the Armenian Plateau. The
shallow Akhurian River keeps this part of historic Armenia separate
and apart from the current Republic of Armenia.

It is unlikely that there were ever really 1,001 churches at Ani.
Still, the actual number must have been substantial–and close enough
to the truth that the number has persisted in our consciousness for a
millennium.

The modern history of Ani has been heartbreaking.

At the end of the nineteenth century, Ani and the surrounding region
of Kars were within the Russian Empire. A Russian archaeologist
recognized the historic value of the site, and he began excavations at
Ani in 1892. After more than two decades of work, he had stored
thousands of artifacts at a museum he had opened within the city’s
walls.

Many of these artifacts were looted or destroyed when Turkey captured
the site from Armenia in 1918.

Armenia couldn’t recover the lost artifacts, but it was able to
reassert its control over Ani. When the independent Republic of
Armenia was established later in 1918, Ani and the surrounding region
of Kars were both included within Armenia’s borders.

The Republic of Armenia’s control of Ani and Kars lasted just about two years.

Turkey invaded Armenia in 1920, seized Ani and Kars, and incorporated
them both into the newly formed Republic of Turkey. The same year,
Armenia was overrun by the Soviet Union. The USSR in 1921 signed a
treaty with Turkey officially ceding to them Ani and Kars. Armenia
wasn’t consulted.

One of Turkey’s first acts of sovereignty over Ani, in 1921, was to
order that the monuments of the city be eradicated.

This obscene order was not completely fulfilled, but many Armenian
churches and monuments in Ani were nevertheless destroyed. Graves were
plundered. And the evidence of the Russian excavations that had begun
in 1892 was obliterated.

For most of the past century, Turkey has characterized the region of
Ani, which sits directly on the modern border of Turkey and Armenia,
as a military zone. Tourists needed a special permit to enter the
region and they had to travel to a military office in Kars, at a
distance of about 45 kilometers, in order to get it. This red tape
discouraged visitors generally, and visitors with Armenian surnames,
particularly, from visiting Ani.

Photography was strictly prohibited. Uniformed soldiers patrolled the
site to ensure there were no violations of this rule.

Today, however, the military designation has been lifted, and tourism
at Ani is encouraged. Photography is permitted. The sight of a tour
bus in the parking lot outside Ani is no longer remarkable.

During the past several years, the Turkish authorities have even
rebuilt some structures at Ani. Some have said that their motivation
for this reconstruction is political. The architectural methods used
in the so-called “restoration” of Armenian churches have also been
criticized, with justification.

Apart from the criticism, however, the opening of Ani, and the
attention that has been given to rebuilding some of the ruins,
suggests that the current custodians of this area see Ani as a site
that is now worth saving and showcasing. That 1921 government order to
destroy the place has apparently been repudiated.

For the first time in a century, pilgrims can freely visit what’s left
of the Armenian capital of Ani. The site is still uninhabited, but the
privilege of full access has made it possible for us to imagine an Ani
that is once again thriving and vibrant.

Adapted from ‘Historic Armenia After 100 Years,’ (Stone Garden Press,
$39.95, Pub. Feb. 2015) by Matthew Karanian. Pre-order now for $35
postpaid in the US from: Stone Garden Productions; PO Box 7758;
Northridge, CA 91327 or pay with credit card by requesting an invoice
from [email protected]

http://asbarez.com/130342/ani-the-mighty-armenian-capital-of-one-thousand-and-one-churches/

Henrikh Mkhitaryan éprouve de la peine pour Jürgen Klopp, l’entraine

FOOTBALL
Henrikh Mkhitaryan éprouve de la peine pour Jürgen Klopp, l’entraineur
du Borussia Dortmund

L’international arménien et milieu de terrain du Borussia Dortmund,
Henrikh Mkhitaryan se déclare > par la situation que traverse
l’entraineur du club allemand Jürgen Klopp dont l’équipe, le Borussia
Dortmund traverse une période très difficile.

>a écrit Henrikh Mkhitaryan sur son site
facebook. Rappelons qu’en manque de performance, le Borussia Dortmund,
vice-champion d’Allemagne en titre, peine dans le championnat allemand
où il est à la mi-saison avant dernier du classement avec 15 points.

Krikor Amirzayan

mercredi 31 décembre 2014,
Krikor Amirzayan (c)armenews.com

Art: Tigran Tsitoghdzyan splits from wife Nadia Kazakova

UPI United Press International
Dec 30 2014

Tigran Tsitoghdzyan splits from wife Nadia Kazakova

Tsitoghdzyan arrived in NYC in 2009 and has been a growing presence in
the Big Apple’s art scene ever since.
By Veronica Linares

NEW YORK, Dec. 29 (UPI) — New York-based painter Tigran Tsitoghdzyan
has separated from his wife and muse, the Russian American model Nadia
Kazakova.

Sources confirmed the split to UPI claiming the couple, who share a
son, remain on good terms. The reason for the separation was not
disclosed.

“It has been extremely unexpected! Nadia has been also a very
important inspiration source for Tigranʼs art,” said filmmaker and
family friend Artur Balder. “If you look at the Madonnas from the
Milennium series, or the first Mirror series, you find Nadiaʼs
presence everywhere. It is sad, but life must go on for both.”

Tsitoghdzyan, who is Armenian, arrived in NYC in 2009 and has been a
growing presence in the Big Apple’s art scene ever since. His work was
shown and sold out at Art Miami earlier this month and he plans to
show a retrospective solo exhibit at the National Gallery of Armenia
in the spring.

http://www.upi.com/Entertainment_News/2014/12/29/Tigran-Tsitoghdzyan-splits-from-wife-Nadia-Kazakova/1511419884367/

Eleven-Month Brandy Production In Armenia Drops By 6.6% To About 17

ELEVEN-MONTH BRANDY PRODUCTION IN ARMENIA DROPS BY 6.6% TO ABOUT 17 MILLION LITERS

YEREVAN, December 30. / ARKA /. Brandy production in Armenia in the
first 11 months of 2014 dropped by 6.6% year-on-year to about 17
million liters, the National Statistical Service said today.

It said also that wine production declined by 13.6% to a little
over 5 million liters, while vodka production decreased by 5.9%
to 387,900 liters.

Production of champagne is said to have declined by 0.2 percent to
400,400 liters, production of beer surged by 22.9 percent to about
23 million liters and production of soft drinks grew by almost 30
percent to about 71 million liters.-0-

http://arka.am/en/news/economy/eleven_month_brandy_production_in_armenia_drops_by_6_6_to_about_17_million_liters/#sthash.u10nnAPB.dpuf

Any Progress In Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process ‘Out Of The Question’

ANY PROGRESS IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH PEACE PROCESS ‘OUT OF THE QUESTION’ – VIGEN HAKOBYAN

16:27 * 30.12.14

Any progress in the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process is out of the
question, and hardly anyone is holding serious expectations, political
scientist Vigen Hakobyan told Tert.am.

“Azerbaijan – especially on the threshold of meetings – tries to show
the international community and the Minsk Group that they should not
think the problem has been settled, and our task is to show Azerbaijan,
especially its President Ilham Aliyev, that attempts to settle the
conflict in such a way have no prospects,” Mr Hakobyan said.

“I do not think any serious progress should be expected next year. The
status quo has not undergone any changes, and I think it is not the
worst scenario for us,” he said.

Should any diplomatic solutions be found, it is self-determination
that the focus must be on. That is, the problem no phased solution.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2014/12/30/vigen-hakobyan/1550435

A More Dynamic Stage Sets On

A MORE DYNAMIC STAGE SETS ON

Igor Muradyan, Political Analyst
Comments – 30 December 2014, 14:42

The act of September 3 was fully placed within Serzh Sargsyan’s
responsibility, and few people doubt that anyone else is to blame
for this hasty act, even the National Assembly.

Did the president realize that this act would eventually be followed
by individual accusations and nobody, including the prime minister,
would share responsibility?

Not a long time ago the government benefitted from the moods of the
general public though now such moods are not explicit. Mentally ill
people called sociologists conducted so-called “survey” with Russian
assistance or other money which yielded pink results and indicated
pro-Russian moods.

Money has similar influence on both mentally ill people or more or less
normal people. Then 86% was mentioned, and very few people doubted
whether 86% and 14% are equal and what they express. Now everything
has collapsed, and soon this 86% will appear in the rubbish box.

Soon Moscow will not remember what percent was considered as an
argument. By the way, no participant of the first war in Karabakh
supported Russia as a key partner or rather patron.

Now some artificially created groups of businessmen who have already
experienced the nightmare for their business are trying to demonstrate
that things are not so bad and are trying to demonstrate that things
are not so bad, and they are making week attempts to overcome the
situation.

The executive is confused and unable to offer anything, even for the
sake of salvation. The appointment of the prime minister was just a
step towards the disaster, to shed responsibility on him if need be
but in vain because a person needs to be responsible to believe in
“responsibility”.

The National Assembly once again was fully obedient, and its
presence reminds how meaningless its existence is. The so-called
“opposition” held two rallies in Yerevan to demonstrate that not only
the “opposition” but also the entire society supports Eurasian death
and limitless loyalty to Russia.

Everything became clear with rallies, and the society has an
opportunity to play an anti-social game because nobody will “go for”
those ralliers.

So, who is ready to share responsibility with the president for
September 3? Apparently, only the society, nobody else. A society
without a face, address and initiative, awaiting the disaster.

The society gave up on the collective means of breakthrough, while
“individual approach” is not enjoyed by everyone but 15-30% of the
adult population.

When nobody is seriously considering coming to power, a great number
of more or less interested people is not against having Serzh Sargsyan
in government. Who would replace him? Perhaps only a Russian viceroy
surrounded by Armenian “writers”-informers.

A more dynamic stage of vassalization starts.

Happy New Year to everyone who still celebrates!

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/33372#sthash.OmpE7yDA.dpuf

Rival Paid By Multiple Heavy Losses, Seyran Ohanyan Says

RIVAL PAID BY MULTIPLE HEAVY LOSSES, SEYRAN OHANYAN SAYS

December 29, 2014 17:22

Armenian Defense Minister Seyran Ohanyan

Yerevan /Mediamax/. Armenian Defense Minister Seyran Ohanyan said
today that the “rival’s conspiratorial actions cost it multiple
heavy losses”.

Seyran Ohanyan’s congratulatory address on New Year states it:

“2014 will mark the history pages as a year when the Armenian people
proved their determination to defend what they achieved during the
Nagorno-Karabakh War. Despite the rival’s attempts to shift the
“sniper war” to the subversive field and the disgraceful downing of
the helicopter carrying out training flights, the Armenian Army did not
give in to provocations and managed to honorably overcome the situation
by employing the “major tasks with small forces” principle in practice.

The rival’s conspiratorial actions cost it multiple heavy losses and
we revealed our present-day heroes who enabled the Armenian Army to
preserve the inaccessibility of the borders of both Armenian states
at the expense of their lives”, said the Defense Minister.

– See more at:

http://www.mediamax.am/en/news/armypolice/12766/#sthash.riPGXZbv.dpuf

President Sargsyan Visits Yerablut Pantheon

PRESIDENT SARGSYAN VISITS YERABLUT PANTHEON

12:24, 30 Dec 2014

Today, President Serzh Sargsyan accompanied by His Holiness Catholicos
of All Armenians Garegin II and the highest leadership of the Republic
visited the Yerablur Pantheon and paid tribute to the memory of the
nation’s sons who gave their lives for the freedom of our Motherland.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2014/12/30/president-sargsyan-visits-yerablut-pantheon/