RFE?RL Armenian Report – 06/20/2022

                                        Monday, 
Head Of Armenian Judicial Watchdog Shows ‘Proof Of Government Blackmail’
        • Anush Mkrtchian
Armenia - Ruben Vartazarian, head of the Supreme Judicial Council, at a news 
conference in Yerevan, .
The nominal head of Armenia’s judicial watchdog controversially suspended last 
year publicized on Monday an audio recording which he believes corroborates his 
claims that the government warned him to resign or face criminal charges.
The official, Ruben Vartazarian, was suspended as chairman of the Supreme 
Judicial Council (SJC) and charged with obstruction of justice in April 2021 
amid rising tensions with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian. Pashinian’s political 
allies accused him of encouraging courts to free arrested government critics.
Vartazarian denied the charges and said that he was indicted as part of 
government efforts to replace him with Gagik Jahangirian, a controversial former 
prosecutor widely seen as a figure loyal to Pashinian.
Jahangirian was named as acting head of the SJC pending the outcome of the 
criminal investigation into Vartazarian. The investigation is still going on, 
according to law-enforcement authorities.
At a news conference held in Yerevan, Vartazarian released a secretly recorded 
audio of his conversation with Jahangirian and another SJC member, Stepan 
Mikaelian, which he said took place on February 20, 2021.
Armenia - Gagik Jahangirian, the acting chairman of the Supreme Judicial 
Council, at a news conference in Yerevan, August 2, 2021.
Jahangirian can be heard seemingly telling Vartazarian that he will not face 
criminal proceedings if he steps down as SJC chairman by March 1, 2021.
“I’m telling you, forget about everything, put aside everything, you have kids, 
you have a home,” Jahangirian says, adding that he does not want “bad things” to 
happen to Vartazarian.
Neither Jahangirian nor the SJC denied the authenticity of the 14-minute audio.
The judicial watchdog, which nominates judges and can also dismiss them, 
released a statement downplaying the significance of the audio. It said that it 
will not comment on the “private conversation” recorded without Jahangirian’s 
knowledge.
The acting head of the SJC told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service that he has nothing to 
add to the statement.
Armenia’s Office of the Prosecutor-General said, meanwhile, that it has 
instructed another law-enforcement agency to examine the recording and determine 
if there was indeed “illegal interference” in criminal investigations relating 
to Vartazarian.
Armenia - The Supreme Judicial Council holds a hearing in Yerevan, July 26, 2021.
Ever since Jahangirian took over the SJC, Armenian courts have rarely rejected 
arrest warrants sought by law-enforcement authorities for opposition figures 
prosecuted on various charges rejected by them as politically motivated. 
Independent and pro-opposition media outlets have regularly accused Jahangirian 
of pressuring judges to make such decisions. He denies that.
Jahangirian stated last August that Armenian courts must be purged of “people 
who have committed crimes against justice.” The 67-year-old himself had been 
accused of grave human rights abuses when serving Armenia’s chief military 
prosecutor from 1997-2006.
In recent months, Armenian opposition groups, lawyers and some judges have 
accused Pashinian’s government of seeking to increase government influence on 
courts under the guise of judicial reforms. The government says the reforms are 
on the contrary increasing judicial independence.
European diplomats signaled their continuing support for the declared reforms 
during a June 8 conference in Yerevan organized by the country’s Constitutional 
Court and the Council of Europe. Armenian opposition lawmakers were not allowed 
to take part in the conference.
U.S. Says Ready To Work With Russia On Karabakh Peace
        • Heghine Buniatian
Armenia - U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Karen Donfried is interviewed by 
RFE/RL in Yerevan, June 18, 2022.
The United States is willing to continue to cooperate with Russia in 
facilitating a settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, U.S. Assistant 
Secretary of State Karen Donfried insisted over the weekend.
The U.S., Russia and France have for decades jointly tried to broker an 
Armenian-Azerbaijani peace accord in their capacity as the co-chairs of the OSCE 
Minsk Group. According to Russian officials, Washington and Paris stopped 
working with Moscow in the Minsk Group format following the Russian invasion of 
Ukraine.
Donfried denied this as she visited Armenia on the last leg of her tour of the 
three South Caucasus states.
“The U.S. has continued to say that we support the Minsk Group co-chair 
process,” she told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service in an interview. “We continue to 
believe that it is a very important format, particularly on Nagorno-Karabakh, 
and it is essential that we keep various formats in play to try to advance 
peace. And we will continue to do that going forward.”
Asked whether Washington is ready for fresh contacts with Moscow for that 
purpose, Donfried said: “Yes. Russia is a Minsk Group co-chair. France, the U.S. 
and Russia would continue in that format.”
In recent weeks, Armenia’s leaders have called for renewed joint activities of 
U.S., Russian and French co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group. Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinian reportedly discussed the matter with Russian President Vladimir Putin 
in a June 1 phone.
Armenia - Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian meets with U.S. Assistant Secretary of 
State Karen Donfried, June 18, 2022.
By contrast, Azerbaijani officials and President Ilham Aliyev in particular have 
repeatedly questioned the need for the Minsk Group’s continued existence. Aliyev 
has said that the war in Ukraine has effectively put an end to that joint 
mediation framework.
“Azerbaijan has not been supportive of the Minsk Group co-chair process, the 
United States is,” said Donfried. “We are a participant in that process and we 
will continue to do so.”
The U.S. official met with Aliyev in Baku before proceeding to Yerevan for talks 
with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian held on Saturday. She said that in both 
capitals she “felt a desire for peaceful settlement.”
Aliyev on Thursday implicitly threatened to resort to military action if Armenia 
continues to oppose the opening of a land corridor connecting Azerbaijan to its 
Nakhichevan exclave. Officials in Yerevan responded by reiterating that 
Armenian-Azerbaijani agreements brokered by Russia call for only conventional 
transport links between the two South Caucasus states.
Commenting on Aliyev’s bellicose rhetoric, Donfried said: “There is no question 
that words matter and so we need to be thoughtful about the words that we use. I 
think actions matter as well but if there is going to be forward progress toward 
reconciliation between Azerbaijan and Armenia there is no question that people 
need to be mindful about their words.”
Armenian President ‘Happy’ With Russia’s Resilience To Sanctions
Russia - Armenian President Vahagn Khachaturian talks to other Armenian 
participants of an economic forum in St Petersburg, June 17, 2022.
President Vahagn Khachaturian has praised Russia’s response to Western 
sanctions, saying that Moscow has confounded gloomy economic predictions made 
right after its invasion of Ukraine.
Khachaturian was among foreign dignitaries who attended an international 
economic forum held in Saint Petersburg late last week with almost no Western 
participation. He sat next to the speakers of both houses of Russia’s parliament 
during the main plenary session of the annual forum that featured a keynote 
address by Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Putin again defended his “special military operation” in Ukraine and dismissed 
the resulting Western sanctions as an “economic blitzkrieg against Russia had no 
chance of succeeding from the very beginning.” He claimed that the unprecedented 
sanctions are primarily damaging Western economies.
Meeting with Putting later on Friday, Khachaturian said he agrees with “the 
conclusions which you drew” in the speech.
“It’s really a new era,” he said at the start of the meeting. “One should 
probably think about how to continue to develop in the new conditions that open 
up new opportunities.”
“I am sure that Russia’s economy will survive based on the resources and means 
at its disposal and given [what happened in] the last two months,” he went on. 
“The expectations, the predictions which … were made even by Russian 
specialists, financiers and economists have not come true.”
RUSSIA – Russian President Vladimir Putin delivers a speech during the St. 
Petersburg International Economic Forum in Saint Petersburg, June 17, 2022
Khachaturian, who himself is an economist, said the Russian authorities’ 
economic policies have reversed a depreciation of the Russian ruble, reined in 
inflation an enabled the domestic economy to continue its “development.”
“In this sense, I am very happy,” added the largely ceremonial president who was 
elected by the Armenian parliament one week after the start of the Russian 
invasion in late February.
Armenia, which has very close economic links with Russia, was initially expected 
to be hit hard by the barrage of sanctions imposed by the United States, the 
European Union and other Western powers. But with the Russian economy proving 
more resilient than expected, the authorities in Yerevan now hope that Armenia’s 
economic growth will not slow down significantly this year.
Khachaturian also praised Putin’s role in the ceasefire that stopped the 2020 
Armenian-Azerbaijani war and follow-up peace efforts.
“I think that the Armenian people appreciate your efforts to resolve the 
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict,” he said.
The president went on to note “historical friendship” of Armenia and Russia. 
“It’s not me, it’s our ancestors who had decided 200 years ago or earlier that 
we must live together and make joint efforts to develop,” he said.
Putin Hopes For ‘Stability’ In Armenia
Russia - Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with his Armenian counterpart 
Vahagn Khachaturian, Saint Petersburg, June 17, 2022.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has described Armenia as Russia’s “strategic 
ally” and said Moscow is interested in political stability in the South Caucasus 
nation.
“Armenia is not just our partner, it’s our strategic ally, and we value that,” 
Putin told Armenian President Vahagn Khachaturian late on Friday during a 
meeting held on the sidelines of the Saint Petersburg International Economic 
Forum.
“We understand what is happening today in Armenia and around Armenia,” he said. 
“We are intent on developing our partnership relations. We are interested in a 
stable situation in the country which will guarantee progressive development.”
Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov similarly expressed hope last month that Armenia 
will enter a “period of stability” when he comment daily antigovernment protests 
launched by the Armenian opposition on May 1. Peskov said the protests aimed at 
toppling Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian are the country’s “internal affair.”
In his opening remarks at his first-ever meeting with Putin, Khachaturian said 
that Pashinian’s official visit to Russia in April had a “huge impact” on the 
political situation in Armenia by ending “some speculation” there.
“But it was clear how you received [Pashinian] here and what he felt when he 
toured [the Russian city of] Nizhny Novgorod,” Khachaturian said, seemingly 
alluding to speculation that Moscow is encouraging opposition groups to oust 
Pashinian.
“I am confident that our further relations will certainly develop. One should 
just help the leadership of the country, I mean Armenia, and, if there are some 
problems, root out those problems,” added the largely ceremonial head of state, 
who was elected by Armenia’s government-controlled parliament earlier this year.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2022 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
 

93 children in Armenia receive care in 61 foster families

Save

Share

 11:23, 16 June 2022

YEREVAN, JUNE 16, ARMENPRESS. 93 children in Armenia are receiving care and upbringing in 61 foster families, Head of the Department of Providing Equal Opportunities at the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs Kristina Hovhannisyan told Armenpress.

She informed that in order to become a foster parent, a person should apply to the governor’s office if he/she is from a province, or to the Yerevan City Hall. If all the requirements are met, the documents are submitted to the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, and after a registration, the ministry organizes trainings and then a certificate is provided.

“In addition to the general foster care, we also have a specialized foster care in case of which a foster parent takes a disabled child to the family. Such children receive care in five foster families”, she said, adding that foster care is paid, and the period of foster care will be considered as a work experience in the period of retirement.

“The foster parent receives 130,000 drams. In case of a disabled child this money is 30% more. The most active province applying for becoming a foster family is Lori and Yerevan, and the most passive province is Vayots Dzor”, she noted.

Turkey ruling party official: We act within cooperation with Azerbaijan in normalization of relations with Armenia

NEWS.am
Armenia –

Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) vice-chairman responsible for foreign affairs has confirmed that the normalization of Ankara-Yerevan relations is linked to Baku-Yerevan relations.

“We act within the framework of cooperation with Azerbaijan in the process of normalization of relations with Armenia,” Efkan Ala said, Haqqin.az reported.

According to him, the meetings within the framework of normalization of Turkey’s relations with Armenia continue.

“Meetings of the special representatives took place. We are waiting for the improvement of relations. I hope that the other side also has the similar objective. Results will be achieved that will be useful not only for the two countries, but also for all the countries in the region,” Ala said.

And speaking about Turkey-Azerbaijan relations, the AKP vice-chairman said that “everyone is advised to learn lessons from that brotherhood.”

81% of Armenian citizens trust Arman Tatoyan, poll shows

Panorama
Armenia – June 7 2022

The Caucasus Research Resource Center (CRRC)-Armenia Foundation on Monday released the Caucasus Barometer 2021. According to the findings of the survey, Armenia’s former Human Rights Defender (Ombudsman) Arman Tatoyan has the highest rating among citizens.

In particular, the poll conducted during Arman Tatoyan’s tenure as the ombudsman of Armenia (from December 18, 2021 to February 4, 2022) reveals that 81% of citizens trust him, 9% of citizens are neutral (neither trust nor does not trust), 7% do not trust him and 2% do not know him.

The Caucasus Research Resource Center also conducted a survey of the opinion of the population of Armenia on which institutions they consider the most reliable.

Among the 17 institutions, according to citizens, the Human Rights Defender’s Office is in the first place.

According to this section, 61.2% of citizens fully trust Arman Tatoyan, 21.4% rather trust, 6.7% neither trust nor do not trust, 3.8% rather do not trust and 6.9% do not trust at all.

Tatoyan served as Armenian ombudsman from 23 February 2016 to 23 February 2022. The Caucasian Barometer survey covers the period from December 18, 2021 to February 4, 2022.

“I feel honored to have 81% of trust of citizens. On my behalf and on behalf of the entire team that worked with me during the research period, I express my sincere gratitude to our citizens for such a high level of trust,” Tatoyan said in a statement on Tuesday.

“This irreplaceable, binding, high-confidence trust is the result of the fact that we have always been honest, compassionate, objective and truly independent at work. One thing was paramount – commitment to the human rights mission,” he added.

Protest movement in Armenia not dying down, opposition leader says

Panorama
Armenia –

Opposition leader and deputy parliament speaker Iskhan Saghatcelyan on Friday dismissed claims that the protest movement aimed at forcing Nikol Pashinyan and his cabinet to resign is dying down.

“The Resistance Movement cannot die down under any circumstances, because the suspension or fading of the movement would mean a defeat for the Armenian people,” Saghatcelyan, who represents the Hayastan bloc, told a briefing in Yerevan’s France Square on Friday.

He highlighted that daily marches and rallies held as part of the civil disobedience campaign launched on 2 May attracted some 50,000 people.

“It’s a purely Armenian and nationwide movement and will definitely succeed,” the lawmaker said.

As one of its key achievements, he stressed that the “whole world now knows that Armenians are not going to concede defeat and are not ready for new concessions [to Azerbaijan].”

Also, he said talks are underway between the opposition and various public and political forces to give fresh impetus to the protest movement.

“There can be no retreat in any case. All our discussions focus on how to expand the movement, fix the mistakes and move forward with greater vigor. We believe that what we have done so far has been very effective, but a new strategy is needed now. Thus, changes are possible in our steps,” Saghatcelyan said.

Asbarez; Yerevan Decries CSTO’s Lack of Response when Azerbaijan Breached Armenia’s Borders

Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan (right) during a press conference on June 10 in Yerevan with CSTO Secretary General Stanislav Zas


Imperative for Karabakh Status Addressed at CSTO Summit

During a summit of CSTO-member states’ foreign ministers in Yerevan on Friday, Armenia’s top diplomat decried the security organization’s lack of response when Azerbaijani forces breached Armenia’s sovereign borders last year and advanced their positions into the Syunik and Gegharkunik provinces.

Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan said while Yerevan remains committed to the mission of the CSTO—the Collective Security Treaty Organization—Azerbaijan’s incursion into Armenia in May 2021 remains an open issue for Armenia.

Soon after the May 13, 2021 incursion by Azerbaijani forces into Armenia’s sovereign territory, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan applied to the CSTO for assistance. The organization did not respond until July, when it said that Armenia and Azerbaijan need to resolve the matter through negotiations.

“In January the organization responded to the incidents in Kazakhstan at the right time, but the issue connected with the incursion of the Azerbaijani troops into Armenia’s sovereign territory, which started in May 2021, still remains open,” Mirzoyan said during a joint press briefing held after the summit with CSTO Secretary General Stanislav Zas in Yerevan on Friday.

“Armenia has been and remains committed to the initiating cooperation within the CSTO aimed at expanding the mutual partnership between the member states, including developing the foreign policy coordination within the CSTO and raising the role of the Organization in the international arena,” added Mirzoyan.

During a meeting with Zas and the CSTO foreign ministers, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan also echoed Mirzoyan’s concerns over the group’s lack of response during last year’s armed incursion by Azerbaijan into Armenia’s territory.

He also highlighted the importance of the settlement of the Karabakh conflict, voicing Yerevan’s support for the involvement of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs. Since the Ukraine war and the showdown between the West and Russia, the three co-chairing countries—Russia, the United States and France—have signaled that the group’s fate is in question. The co-chairs representing each country have been given new diplomatic ranks having to do with the Caucasus.

Pashinyan briefed the CSTO representatives about the current situation in the region, and spoke about the activity of the Armenia-Azerbaijan delimitation and border security commission, the opening of regional transit routes and the return of Armenian prisoners of war, hostages and other civilians still being held in Azerbaijan.

Pashinyan emphasized that the transit routes that are to be opened must operate with the sovereignty of the country through which they pass remaining intact. In this context, he also said that there cannot be discussion of a corridor, referring to Baku’s insistence to establish the so-called “Zangezur Corridor” that connects mainland Azerbaijan with Nakhichevan through a road in Armenia.

Protesters detained after trying to bar Pashinyan from entering Ararat, oppositionist says

Panorama
Armenia –

Many protesters were detained after attempting to bar Nikol Pashinyan from entering Ararat Province on Saturday morning, lawyer Arsen Babayan, a senior member of the opposition Homeland Party, said on Telegram.

“This morning, Nikol Pashinyan travelled to Ararat Province on a working visit. Citizens tried to block his entry to the region, noting that he has no right to visit the communities,” he wrote, adding many of the protesters were taken to police stations.

“I would like to tell the pro-government circles that next time you boast that your prime minister can travel freely in Armenia, remember that your elder brother Aliyev can move around “freely” in Armenia as well,” Babayan said.

“I advise the police against detaining Armenians during Aliyev’s tour,” he added.

CoE: Armenia: despite legislative reforms, survivors of human trafficking face uphill struggle to access justice

May 31 2022
GROUP OF EXPERTS ON ACTION AGAINST TRAFFICKING IN HUMAN BEINGS (GRETA) STRASBOURG 31 MAY 2022

The Council of Europe’s Group of Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (GRETA) have published a new report on Armenia focusing on human trafficking victims’ access to justice and effective remedies. GRETA acknowledges improvements in the legislative and policy framework but asks the authorities to strengthen the provision of information to victims, improve access to legal aid and psychological assistance, facilitate access to compensation from the perpetrators, as well as to effectively investigate offences of human trafficking for all forms of exploitation and promote reintegration of victims.

Since the previous evaluation in 2017, Armenia has continued to develop its anti-trafficking legislative and policy framework: in 2021 a new Criminal Code and a new Criminal Procedure Code were adopted and amendments to the Labour Code were being prepared. GRETA urges the authorities to ensure that access to legal assistance is guaranteed as soon as there are reasonable grounds for believing that a person is a victim of human trafficking and before the person concerned has to decide whether on co-operating with the authorities in a criminal investigation.

The report also examines progress made on the implementation of previous GRETA recommendations on selected topics. GRETA urges the Armenian authorities to continue reinforcing the capacity and skills of all relevant officials to detect and investigate cases of trafficking for labour exploitation. Further, the authorities should strengthen efforts to prevent child trafficking among vulnerable groups (children in rural areas and children placed in child-care institutions) and pay more attention to the link between child trafficking and the use of information and communication technologies.

The total number of victims of trafficking identified in the period 2017-2021 in Armenia was 68. Two thirds of identified victims were women and girls. The prevailing form of exploitation was sexual exploitation, followed by labour exploitation and forced begging. Almost all identified victims were Armenian nationals exploited inside Armenia. The real number of trafficking victims is probably higher, the report says, as self-identification by trafficking victims occurs only rarely due to the lack of awareness of their rights, stigma, the feeling of shame and distrust vis-à-vis the authorities.


https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/-/armenia-despite-legislative-reforms-survivors-of-human-trafficking-face-uphill-struggle-to-access-justice

ARS Eastern US announces 2022 annual essay contest winners

The Armenian Relief Society of Eastern US Board of Directors has announced the winners of its 2022 Essay Contest. “The ARS of Eastern US Board of Directors extends its heartfelt congratulations to all the students for devoting time and effort to the ARS of Eastern US Essay Contest and sends its continuing gratitude to the principals and teachers for their contribution in this mutually beneficial educational initiative.”

Over 100 students from Armenian schools across the eastern US participated in the annual essay competition. The ARS of Eastern US sponsors the annual event for Armenian daily and one-day school students to encourage them to think about matters of importance to Armenians and how those issues impact their young lives. Since His Holiness Catholicos Aram I proclaimed 2022 the Year of the Diaspora, the ARS Eastern US Board of Directors decided on the following prompt for students: How do you see your role as a young member in the Diaspora?

Students were invited to write about their roles and responsibilities toward their nation, their church, their culture or their dream profession.

Judges were members of the ARS Washington “Satenig” Chapter: Lousin Hovanesian, Sarah Dudek, Elo Tanashian and Lena Damirjian. The ARS Regional Board liaison was Irma Kassabian.

Students from the following Armenian one-day schools participated:  Hamasdegh School, Washington, DC; Haigazian School, PA; Nareg School, N.J.; St. Stephen’s Saturday School, Watertown, Mass.; Taniel Varoujan School, Glenview, IL

Students from the following Armenian day schools participated: Holy Martyrs Armenian Day School, Oakland Gardens, N.Y.; Armenian Sisters Academy, Radnor, PA.

All winners will be awarded Amazon gift cards.

Armenian – Day school

3rd & 4th

  1.     Ari Shirozian – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA
  2.     Victoria Stepanian – Holy Martyrs School, NY
  3.     Lucia Betrano – Holy Martyrs School, NY

 5th & 6th

  1.     Vani Ashodian – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA
  2.     Nazani Baronian – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA
  3.     Gabriella Keshishian – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA

 7th & 8th

  1.     Zachary Badalian Sarikian – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA
  2.     Araz Balian – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA
  3.     Cameron Santerian – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA

Armenian – Saturday school

3rd & 4th

  1.     Benjamin Berberian – Nareg School, NJ

5th & 6th

  1.     Victoria Penenian – Hamasdegh School, DC
  2.     Ani Garabet – Hamasdegh School, DC

7th & 8th

  1.     Haig Penenian – Hamasdegh School, DC
  2.     Alex Belekian – St. Stephen’s School, MA
  3.     Leanna Seraydarian – St. Stephen’s School, MA

English –  Day school

3rd & 4th

  1.     Aren Torcomian – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA
  2.     Sophia Keshishian – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA
  3.     Victoria Megerian – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA

5th & 6th

  1.     Sebastian Markarian – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA
  2.     Isaiah Ambartsoumian – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA
  3.     Zaven Sevag – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA

7th & 8th

  1.     Nicholas Soltanian – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA
  2.     Sophie Yacoubian – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA
  3.     Cole Cosgrove – Armenian Sisters Academy, PA


English – Saturday School

3rd & 4th

  1.     Varak Dakarian – Taniel Varoujan School, IL
  2.     Taleen Ghazaryans – St. Stephen’s School, MA

 7th & 8th

  1.     Michael Bederjikian – Nareg School, NJ
  2.     Dickran Kochian – Nareg School, NJ
  3.     Vahe Kassarjian – Holy Martyrs School, NY
The ARS Eastern USA has 32 chapters located throughout the New England, Mid-Atlantic, Midwestern, and Southeastern regions of the United States. Please contact the ARS Eastern U.S. Regional Office () if you would like more information about a chapter near you.


"Karabakh is up for sale" – Armenian opposition on Pashinyan-Aliyev Brussels talks


May 25 2022


  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Armenian opposition’s reaction to Pashinyan-Aliyev talks in Brussels

“The Armenian-Azerbaijani talks serve Azerbaijani interests”, “Nikol Pashinyan put Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh up for a geopolitical auction in order to save his office”. This is how the Armenian oppositionists assessed the Brussels talks between Nikol Pashinyan and Ilham Aliyev, which took place on May 22 with the mediation of the head of the European Council. The leaders of the parliamentary opposition and supporters of the ongoing resistance movement, who have taken to the streets of Yerevan for a month now demanding the resignation of the Prime Minister of Armenia, have once again reaffirmed their opinion that Pashinyan is “betraying the interests of the Armenian people”.


  • Third Pashinyan-Aliyev meeting in Brussels ‘productive’, parties say
  • Op-ed: ‘Armenia and Azerbaijan maneuver between Russia and the West’
  • Armenian MPs may lose mandates for protesting, skipping sessions

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov received first-hand information about the next round of the Pashinyan-Aliyev talks in Brussels by talking on the phone with colleagues in Yerevan and Baku. According to the Armenian Foreign Ministry, during a telephone conversation

  • issues related to the establishment of a demarcation and border security commission between Armenia and Azerbaijan were discussed,
  • the unblocking of economic ties and transport communications in the region was addressed,
  • Minister Mirzoyan confirmed the position of Armenia regarding the establishment of regional peace and stability and the settlement process between Armenia and Azerbaijan,
  • issues related to the bilateral and multilateral agenda of the Armenian-Russian cooperation were discussed, and an exchange of views took place on steps aimed at further strengthening of the allied relations.

On May 22, the third face-to-face meeting between Pashinyan and Aliyev took place with the mediation of the head of the European Council, Charles Michel. The previous Brussels talks between the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan were held in December 2021 and April 2022.

Following the talks, which lasted more than five hours, the head of the European Council made a statement. It said that in the coming days, the first meeting of the joint commission on the delimitation of the Armenian-Azerbaijani border would be held on the interstate border, which already took place on May 24th.

Charles Michel also said that the parties agreed to unblock communications in the region. According to him, Pashinyan and Aliyev “agreed on the principles governing transit between western Azerbaijan and Nakhichevan, as well as between various parts of Armenia through Azerbaijan, through international transportation through the communication infrastructure of both countries. In particular, they agreed on the principles of border management, security, land fees, as well as customs duties in the context of international transport”.

During the meeting of the CSTO member-states’ leaders in Moscow, President Putin praised the bloc’s ‘growth’ while PM Pashinyan criticised it for inaction despite Armenia’s appeals for help

According to the parliamentary opposition, which has been actively fighting in the street for almost a month demanding Pashinyan’s resignation, the results of the trilateral meeting in Brussels once again confirmed that “the negotiations are fully in line with the agenda promoted by Azerbaijan”:

“Pashinyan put Armenia and Artsakh up for a geopolitical auction to stay in his chair. Armenia has reached the threshold beyond which not only the future of Artsakh is doubtful, but also the basic sovereignty of the Republic of Armenia”.

The opposition drew attention to the fact that in Michel’s statement

  • no mention is made of the right of NK residents to self-determination,
  • nothing is said about the mandate of the co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group, on whose participation in the negotiations the Armenian side insisted all this time,
  • the issue of determining the status of Nagorno-Karabakh is ignored,
  • the toponym “Nagorno-Karabakh” is missing,
  • instead of the term “people of Nagorno-Karabakh”, the term “ethnic Armenian population of Karabakh” is used.

“This means that the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh, according to the agreement between Pashinyan and Aliyev, are considered as a national minority within Azerbaijan. The term “transit between different parts of Armenia through Azerbaijan” was even used, which entails extremely dangerous consequences – even for the sovereignty of Armenia, as well as the possibility of another unfounded territorial claims of Azerbaijan”.

The oppositionists said that Nikol Pashinyan does not have a mandate from the citizens of Armenia, because “the agreements reached with him do not express the opinion of the Armenian people, they are illegitimate.”

Armenian opposition’s program and proposals – what steps the oppositionists intend to take in the event of the resignation of the current government, as well as an expert opinion on their program

The press secretary of the president of the unrecognized NKR, Lusine Avanesyan, recalled the approach of the Karabakh side to the negotiation agenda at all venues:

  • “the full recognition of the right of the Armenians of NK to self-determination is not subject to reservations or concessions,
  • international recognition of the independence of the Republic of Artsakh remains the benchmark,
  • any status within Azerbaijan is unacceptable,
  • a return to the past, not only in terms of status, but also in terms of demographics, is unacceptable,
  • the Republic of Artsakh is faced with the task of restoring its territorial integrity”.

What did the authorities of Armenia and NK agree on? A meeting of the Armenian authorities with the leadership of the unrecognized NKR was held in Yerevan, following PM Pashinyan’s visit to Moscow

In Armenia, Ilham Aliyev’s statement made during a conversation with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan was also ambiguously perceived. The President of Azerbaijan said that an agreement was reached in Brussels on the “Zangezur corridor”, referring to the construction of railways and highways through the territory of Armenia.

The Secretary of the Security Council of Armenia was forced to comment on this statement. Armen Grigoryan stressed that no road or transport route “in the logic of a corridor” can pass through the territory of Armenia, and the agreements only concern the unblocking of regional communications.

Azerbaijan, after signing a tripartite statement on the cessation of hostilities in Karabakh, has repeatedly demanded a “corridor” through the southern, Syunik region of Armenia. This refers to the road connecting Azerbaijan with its exclave Nakhichevan. The Armenian side constantly replied that it was ready to unblock the roads, but categorically rejected the use of the term “corridor”, which implies the loss of sovereignty over this territory.

The Secretary of the Security Council also addressed the point of Charles Michel’s message, which refers to transit “between different parts of Armenia through Azerbaijan”. According to him, “this may be due to the fact that a railway passes through Nakhichevan, connecting the north of Armenia with the south”:

“We are talking about the possibility for Armenian citizens to get to Meghri from Yeraskh through the territory of the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic and back on the same principles as the citizens of Azerbaijan — from Horadiz to Nakhichevan through the territory of Armenia”.

What is known at this time, what roads people used during the Soviet years, what do the residents of Meghri think about the construction of new transport communications, what they fear and what are they waiting for

Political scientist Tigran Grigoryan argues that the composition of the Armenian commission on border delimitation and demarcation was determined long ago, so the publication of the names of those who are included in it has nothing to do with the Brussels meeting.

He also took note of Russia’s special attitude to the talks between the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan mediated by European partners. The political scientist believes that Moscow “wants to keep abreast”, which is also evident from telephone conversations with Yerevan and Baku after the Pashinyan-Aliyev meeting in Brussels:

“There is some jealousy about the EU’s active mediating role. Moscow is trying to show that all this is agreed with them, they are coordinating the process”.

According to Azerbaijani political scientist Elkhan Shahinoglu, Moscow resists direct Baku-Yerevan negotiations, but the West supports them

According to the political scientist, Aliyev’s statement on the agreement on the “Zangezur corridor” is primarily intended for an internal audience. On the other hand, he notes that the parallels with the so-called “corridor” can have positive consequences for the Armenian side:

“The Zangezur corridor, according to the Azerbaijani wording (which does not explain how it can be a corridor), is placed on the same plane with the Yeraskh-Ordubad-Julfa-Meghri railway through the territory of Nakhichevan. This means that the same regulations should work, communications should be opened according to the same principle. As far as the railroad is concerned, at least it eliminates the logic of a corridor”.

Referring to the principles of international transportation through the communication infrastructure of both countries, Tigran Grigoryan recalls that in December last year in Brussels, the parties already agreed on the construction of a transit railway communication on the principle of reciprocity, while respecting the sovereignty of the countries through which the roads will pass.

He considers the issue of the road route to be more problematic: specifically, of where exactly will the road connecting Azerbaijan with Nakhichevan pass:

“There are serious disagreements here, there is no agreement on basic principles, which is why there are no meaningful, practical steps in this process”.

Nagorno-Karabakh issue and the signing of a peace treaty. Despite the war in Ukraine and the attention of world centers being diverted to it, certain processes are still ongoing

The political scientist refused to comment on the statement of the Armenian opposition, but said that the use of the term “ethnic Armenian population of Karabakh” is indeed problematic.

According to Grigoryan, if Nagorno-Karabakh is an administrative-territorial unit adopted in the negotiation process, then the concept of Karabakh is wider:

“For example, in Azerbaijan there is the Karabakh economic zone, which includes not only the settlements that were part of the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region, but also a number of settlements outside it. Baku also includes the Terter region of Azerbaijan in the Karabakh economic zone. In this sense, the wording of Michel’s statement is indeed problematic. By the same logic, one could say “the rights and security of the Armenian population of Azerbaijan”, and in principle nothing would have changed”.

The political scientist notes that the rights and security of the NK population are mentioned in addition to the clause on the peace agreement with Azerbaijan. From this it becomes clear that we are talking about “the security and rights of Armenians in Azerbaijan”, which, according to Tigran Grigoryan, is unacceptable.