The Armenian Weekly; July 12, 2008; Commentary and Analysis

The Armenian Weekly On-Line
80 Bigelow Avenue
Watertown MA 02472 USA
(617) 926-3974
[email protected]

http://www.a rmenianweekly.com

The Armenian Weekly; Volume 74, No. 27; July 12, 2008

Commentary and Analysis:

1. ‘Research’ as a Cloaking Device
By Tatul Sonentz-Papazian

2. Messing with History
By Garen Yegparian

3. Letters to the Editor
a) ARF Should Quit Coalition
b) Why Haven’t We All Visited Armenia?
c) Gay Rights

***

1. ‘Research’ as a Cloaking Device
By Tatul Sonentz-Papazian

The July 8 issue of the Boston Globe published a piece by Susan Kinzie of
the Washington Post titled "Genocide dispute unsettles Turkish studies
institute," relating incidents that ".set off a dispute over politics and
academic freedom at an institute housed at Georgetown University." and led
to the resignation, this summer, of several board members of the Institute
of Turkish Studies who protested the ouster of the board chairman,
Binghamton University professor Donald Quataert, "who wrote that scholars
should research, rather than avoid, what he characterized as an Armenian
genocide."

Apparently, a short time after the publication of this writing, in late
2006, Professor Quataert resigned from the board of governors, stating that
".the Turkish ambassador to the United States told him he had angered some
political leaders in Ankara and that they had threatened to revoke the
institute’s funding." When word got to ". a prominent association of Middle
Eastern scholars," they wrote letters to the institute, the prime minister
and other leaders of Turkey, asking for the reinstatement of Professor
Quataert and-to avoid future political influence and pressures-for the
funding of the institute to be put in an irrevocable trust.

It is truly hard to decide which is more distasteful: The shameless
subversion of U.S. institutions of higher learning by Turkish governments
through bribes and blackmail, or the belated "indignation" of the "prominent
Middle Eastern scholars" who beyond a doubt have been aware of the attitude
of many academic centers-all beneficiaries of the continued Turkish
"largesse"-who have willingly exchanged by now the tattered mantle of
VERITAS for very lucrative deals with Ankara’s desecration program of
recorded history. One is forced to wonder whether these "prominent scholars"
would have reacted at all if it hadn’t been for the ouster of Professor
Quataert, an act that could stand as a potential threat to each and every
academic in the field.

Denial-oriented "research," along with vested interests on the highest
levels of the present-day U.S. establishment, constitute the cloaking device
behind which the genocidal process against Christian minorities, started in
the Ottoman Empire as early as the 19th century, continues to this day in
insidious ways, in the eastern territories of the Turkish Republic against
the remnants of Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians-parallel to the ongoing
decimation of the Kurds-through forced conversions to Islam and the denial
of the very basic human and minority rights guaranteed by the impotent
Treaty of Lausanne, which through its innate inequities laid the foundations
for today’s catastrophic state of affairs in the region.

Speaking of this sad affair, Professor Quataert has stated that during his
time at the institute, no one ever applied for grants to finance studies
that could be construed as controversial in Turkey. No kidding!
—————————————– ————————————————-

2. Messing with History
By Garen Yegparian

As those who have tried to change history can attest, it doesn’t work. Check
with Holocaust deniers, ex-Soviet leaders (and their counterparts in Animal
Farm), and even Turkey.

Serge Sarkisian’s statement during his visit to Russia should have been
informed by this knowledge, but was not. Alas. Not only did he come off as
being ready to negotiate away the genocide, but it seemed like he was
brownnosing to the genocidal state. How demeaning! I was going to critique
just this gaffe, but he’s made it worse, as you’ll see below.

As a contrast, take the LATimes’ reporting on the example of Israel’s
Wiesenthal Center (for two consecutive days as of this writing). It has put
up a $450,000 bounty for Aribert Heim, Dr. Death (not to be confused with
the good guy of the same moniker, Jack Kevorkian, of assisted suicide fame).
The guy, if alive (his family says he died in 1993), would be 94. Nazi
hunters have landed in Chile to look for him in Patagonia. It’s 63 years
after World War II and the Holocaust ended, and these guys are intently
pursuing the guilty. That’s dignity.

Interestingly, one of our SpitRain Award winners, Abe Foxman of ADL infamy,
after a visit to Turkey, remarked that he thought the fallout (with Turkey)
from the controversy over his "tantamount to genocide" and related comments
is "behind us." He also reported advising the Turkish leaders he met with to
focus on current issues with Armenia (including opening borders) as a way of
creating relationships that will ease the way to dealing with more sensitive
issues. I read this as "divide and conquer" and nothing else. Is the timing
just coincidence, I wonder?

But, back to Sarkisian, who had an op-ed piece in the July 9 Wall Street
Journal (WSJ). Here, he seemingly corrects his gaffe, but really digs the
hole deeper by avoiding calling Turkey’s border closure by its proper name,
a blockade. He focuses instead on the allegedly beneficial economics of open
borders. Think of what NAFTA has done to Mexico’s peasantry and lower
middleclass workers in the U.S. before you buy that pile of hooey.

Then Sarkisian seems to laud the circuitous (via Georgia) trade that is
ongoing between Armenia and Turkey. He seems to miss the point that the
increased cost of this routing enables Armenia’s fledgling economy to
produce some goods. Were trade direct, agriculture and small manufacturing
products wouldn’t stand a chance against Turkey’s industrial/agricultural
juggernaut. By implementing its pan-Turkic policy of assisting Azerbaijan,
Turkey has actually helped Armenia with the blockade. We should be making it
politically more difficult, not easier, for them to relent and open the
border. I have to wonder if, given the pervasive corruption in Armenia, some
fatcats have come to an agreement with their Turkish counterparts that, if
successful, would lead to the further fleecing of Armenia’s people.

Then Sarkisian makes a ridiculous analogy of our situation with the
ping-pong diplomacy of the early 1970’s. How can that pre-Nixon/Mao-meeting
goodwill-building phenomenon be compared to the Armenia/Turkey situation?
Had either China or the U.S. committed genocide against the other and
persisted in denying it? How absurd! He almost seems to beg for normalized
relations with Turkey, once again demeaning his office, our landlocked
country, and our whole world-dispersed nation.

Of course there’s the invitation for Turkish President Abdullah Gul to join
Armenia’s president in watching the Armenia-Turkey soccer match. On its own,
that’s not such a bad idea. It could have been on our turf, on our terms. If
nothing else, it would have provided an opportunity to organize a massive
protest. But in the present context, it’s enough to make even the most
stolid person squirm with unease.

What’s going on? Serge Sarkisian is the guy who stood up to and fought Turks
to our east. Why is Sarkisian being so accommodating of the (even more
directly genocidal) Turks to our west?

By the way, you can, and should send comments to the WSJ. I did, and it was
posted, though I know of at least one person whose submission was not
accepted. This is what mine read, and it has already been criticized as
being too weak, though a foremost concern of mine was appearing in WSJ space
about the genocide while tying Turkey legally to the Ottoman Empire:

"President Sarkisian seems to be back-peddling from his earlier comments
(during a visit to Russia two weeks ago) regarding the matter of a
‘commission.’

"Turkey has sought the establishment of such an entity as a means of forever
delaying admission of its culpability for the Armenian Genocide committed
1915-23 by its legal predecessor state, the Ottoman Empire.

"Sarkisian’s more nuanced and broadened approach to this matter is a welcome
correction, though still suspect to most Armenians worldwide."

Is something cooking? It’s very fishy. Sarkisian’s comment in Moscow
followed by Gul saying they’re evaluating the invitation, contemporaneous
with Abe Foxman’s comments and capped with the WSJ piece. If he’s running a
deft ruse, Sarkisian should at least come clean with our leadership.
Similarly if he’s just trying to divert external pressure. Regardless, we
should keep up the public heat on him. This simply enables his game,
strengthening his bargaining position. Conversely, if it’s simply a matter
of poor judgment on his part, our outcry will drive him back to more
appropriate policies. The very possibility that something has been cooked up
to ease pressure on Turkey is proof of the value of the heat we maintain on
Turkey through our genocide recognition and other Turkey-oriented actions in
the Diaspora. Given Matthew Bryza’s recent visit to the area, Foxman’s
Turkey trip, the lame-duck period of Bush’s presidency with its traditional
focus on foreign policy, and the op-ed’s publication in the WSJ (a bastion
of the U.S. establishment’s right wing), makes me suspect intense U.S.
activity.

Write the WSJ, Armenia’s consulates and embassies, expressing your dismay
and opposition to the dangerous path Sarkisian has started following.
————————————— ————————————————-

3. Letters to the Editor

a) ARF Should Quit Coalition

Dear Editor,

Further to my June 30 email, President Sarkisian has now officially invited
a denialist to Yerevan and ignored all advice not to do so. He has become a
disgrace in the eyes of millions of Armenians.

I believe the main reason for his foolish and very dangerous step is to
strengthen his very weak position in the eyes of the U.S. and EU, so that
they keep a closed eye to his wrongdoings in Armenia over all these years.

I firmly believe the time has come for the ARF to say goodbye to such a
president, as such a coalition is going nowhere and is doomed for failure.

The ARF must be very firm and honest about this issue as anything else is
tantamount to betrayal of the Armenian nation and what the ARF has stood for
over all these years. Turkey will use this move in her favor by deliberately
misleading and confusing the international community, as she has done in the
past with the famous TARC group financed by the U.S. State Department.

This president has sadly lost all credibility. Time to move on.

Mihran Keheyian
London, England

***

b) Why Haven’t We All Visited Armenia?

Dear Editor,

I am amazed at the number of American-Armenians that have yet to visit
Armenia. I am talking about people that are active in our
cultural/youth/church groups, who take cruises, travel to Europe, visit Dude
Ranches, and drop $2,000 or more on a 4-day kef weekend at the Cape. Why
have ye not visited the homeland?

The Marriot in Republic Square has the same amenities as the Marriot in
Manhattan and the Ani Hotel is exquisite. Many of you have known the names
of all the sites since your first visit to camp and although I could list
them here as a reminder I won’t.

Some of you have said, "What would I do there? I feel if I go to Armenia I
would have to do something." When you travel to Italy do you think, What
will I do for this country? No, you go as a tourist to see the country, eat
the food, and feel the culture. Why not go to Armenia and see the country,
hear the language, eat those apricots you have been hearing about, and see
if they are as large or as sweet as you have been told? Check out the
pomegranates. Did you know that all pomegranates, regardless of size, are
said to have 365 seeds in them, one for each day of the year to bring us
good luck? I heard that story in Yerevan and recall it with a smile each
time I see one.

You should see the country through your own eyes, feel it, meet and talk to
the people, go into their homes, see how they really live, form your own
opinions.

Every place you visit has its down side. If you came to Boston I would stay
clear of Roxbury/Dorchester. Do you know over this past July 4th weekend
there were five shootings that led to death in those neighborhoods? Downtown
Crossing is a ghost town with the closing of several stores and it’s scary
to walk there. There have always been beggars downtown because of the Arch
Street Chapel that might have a food kitchen, and with the lack of shoppers
it’s all you see. I might not take you to the Franklin Park Zoo because it
is located in Roxbury; the fabulous Arnold Arboretum is in Jamaica Plain but
borders Dorchester and the Emerald Necklace; a park system designed by
Olmstead travels through Boston, the South End, Roxbury, and Dorchester
ending at the Arboretum. Outside of the city in upscale Belmont Hill you
have to dodge the pot holes else you would lose a tire on a daily basis and
our bridges are in disrepair.

But ya know, the sun was out this weekend, I went to the beach, picked derev
and made yalanchi for my son, spent an afternoon with my new hars, and all
is fabulous.

On the next to last day of my most recent trip to Yerevan, I was alone in
the afternoon walking towards the Cascade, wanting to sit, look out at the
park, have a coffee, and just sort of veg. As I was having a senior moment
and was not sure if I was walking in the right direction, I stopped a young
lady and said "Kourig jan, Cascada ice gomneh?" She pointed and replied
"Ha."

Now when I hear our African-Americans refer to each other as brother and
sister I smile instead of becoming fearful. This past weekend I watched a
foreign film about India called "DOR." Every time they said "Ha" the word
"yes" appeared in the subtitles and they ate goat meat with pilov. How
different are we really from each other?

To our young adults: You have so many advantages. You could spend summers
volunteering through one of the hundreds of agencies. Birthright Armenia
reimburses fees for volunteers that meet certain criteria. How about a
semester in Yerevan instead of a semester in Paris? And for those that can
no longer take the summer off, one could certainly do a tour through their
church/fraternal organization or a travel agency.

Some might think it’s an adventure that is more than they can handle. Every
day is an adventure and it’s time to pack your bags and take the journey.

Barbara Najarian
Lexington, Mass.

***

c) Gay Rights

Dear Editor,

Mr. Gerami brings to light an important issue for the Armenian-American
community (Armenian Weekly, "Letter to the Editor," July 5, 2008). The
debate over whether the U.S. should recognize gay marriage is an issue that
will gauge how far the U.S. has come since the Civil Rights movement.

Nevertheless, countless right-wing politicians staunchly oppose any measure
that aims to grant equal marital rights to the gay and lesbian community. In
2004, San Francisco legalized same sex marriages, to which President Bush
angrily responded: "I’m troubled by what I’ve seen. I have consistently
stated that I’ll support [a] law to protect marriage between a man and a
woman. And, obviously, these events are influencing my decision."

This leaves me wondering: What exactly are the decisions being influenced by
same sex marriages? Perhaps it’s his decision to abandon any genuine attempt
to kill or even capture Osama bin Laden while diverting his resources to
finding Iraq’s nonexistent weapons of mass destruction. Perhaps it’s his
decision to turn a blind eye to the treatment of our soldiers at Walter Reed
Hospital. Perhaps it’s his consistent and vehement denial of the Armenian
Genocide.

No, but allowing homosexuals to get married? That calls for drastic action.
It seems as though the President has drawn the line in the sand. As
Armenians, we have an obligation to stand with Mr. Gerami and fight for
justice.

Garo Youssoufian
Princeton, N.J.

25 Year Old Girl Murdered And 24 Year Old Boy Wounded

25-YEAR-OLD GIRL MURDERED AND 24-YEAR-OLD BOY WOUNDED

A1+
14 July, 2008

The seventy-year-old man sitting on a window-sill of apt. 7, house
188, Bashinjaghian Str., with a bloody face and an axe in his hand,
threatened to jump out since 1.00 p.m. July 14.

Today he appeared in his former flat. He had already killed 25-year-old
G. and wounded 24-year-old R. with a stonemason’s hammer. R. was
taken to "Armenia" medical centre while G. died on the spot.

People crowded near the building wondering what the 70-year-old man
would do next. N. now stood on the window-sill, looked down with
his bloody face and then sat on the sill. Meanwhile policemen and
rescurers were thinking of a plan to render N. harmless.

Finally, at about 4.00 policemen broke into the flat and took
N. out. The sight was really appalling.

People gathered on the scene told A1+ that N. had attempted suicide
four years before.

Neighbours said that N.’s son had pawned the flat and taken a loan of
$2000 from a bank. "N. couldn’t pay the money and lost the flat. The
boy cheated his mother and made her sign some documents. The poor woman
obeyed him without realising the hanging grave consequences. Four
years ago when the employees of Compulsory Service dropped in to
vacate the flat, N. dropped a wheel on a police car from the seventh
floor. The poor man had gone mad. Nevertheless, they were forced off,"
a neighbour told A1+.

Former district head of Ajapnyak commune, Artsrun Khacahtrian,
had given them $2000 so that they could pay the debt and keep the
flat. They say the boy had squandered the money, too. The old people
could hardly make both ends meet. They sold greens at the market. The
woman died this year and N. stayed alone. He was completely at a loss,"
said another neighbour.

One of the men grouped in front of the building told us that N. had
sat beside them today and watched them playing backgammon. "He was
in low spirits. He didn’t play. Nor did he utter a word. As far as I
know he had appealed to court to return the flat but all his efforts
were in vain. This is the real picture of our courts. They make people
fly into a rage and become insane."

A. Avagian whose daughter had been killed worked in a shop in the
ground floor of the same building. "You cannot imagine how nice
people they were. In fact, they had no connection with the flat,
they simply rented it. Instead of punishing his own son, N. killed
an innocent girl. It is still unknown whether the wounded boy will
live. This is a great tragedy," said the employees in tears.

Russia Must Punish States Hosting U.S. Missile Shield – Analyst

RUSSIA MUST PUNISH STATES HOSTING U.S. MISSILE SHIELD – ANALYST

RIA Novosti
17:32 | 09/ 07/ 2008

Russia must use economic and political means, and military ties
with Asia, to punish European states that agree to host U.S. missile
defense elements, a Russian political analyst said on Wednesday.

Commenting on a U.S.-Czech deal signed on Tuesday on deploying a
missile tracking radar, Col. Gen. Leonid Ivashov, the head of the
Moscow-based Academy of Geopolitical Sciences, said: "Russia should
not limit itself to statements. We must have a plan, adopted by
the Russian Security Council, setting out measures on the economic,
political and military cooperation levels."

Moscow has strongly opposed the possible deployment by the U.S. of
10 interceptor missiles in Poland and an accompanying radar in the
Czech Republic as a threat to its security and international nuclear
deterrence.

Washington says the defenses are needed to deter a possible strike
from Iran.

The U.S.-Czech missile shield treaty has yet to be ratified by the
Czech parliament and signed by the Czech president. The country’s
opposition is currently holding mass rallies around the country against
the placement of an early warning radar near the capital, Prague.

Polish-American talks on Washington’s plans to place a missile base
in Poland have stalled. Poland’s prime minister said last Friday that
his country was not satisfied with the terms offered by the U.S.,
but was ready for further dialogue.

Ivashov, who headed the main directorate for military cooperation
at the Russian Defense Ministry in 1996-2001, told RIA Novosti:
"On the political level, we must suspend our cooperation with NATO,
because it brings us nothing but harm."

As an alternative, he suggested that Russia start negotiations with
China, India and other countries to form a global alliance against
the U.S. missile shield in Europe.

"A relevant decision must be made, at least in the framework of the
Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO)," Ivashov said.

The CSTO is a regional security organization comprising Armenia,
Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.

On the economic level, Russia must restrict imports and exports from
and to countries which allow the placement of U.S. missile defense
systems on their territory.

"Bilateral relations with these countries as a whole must be limited,"
Ivashov said.

"Russia must also warn the European countries that… in case
of a potential military confrontation… capitals, large cities,
and industrial and communications centers of the countries hosting
elements of the U.S. missile shield will inevitably become primary
targets of nuclear strikes," the general said.

"They should know that we are holding them in our sights," he added.

Iranian Scientist Doesn’T Advise Considering Iran From US Propaganda

IRANIAN SCIENTIST DOESN’T ADVISE CONSIDERING IRAN FROM US PROPAGANDA’S POSITION

ArmInfo
2008-07-08 14:59:00

During a seminar "Iran as a regional threat: problems and prospects"
organized in Yerevan by "Spectrum" Center for Strategic Analysis,
Farhad Atai, a professor at Tehran University, said that he doesn’t
advise considering Iran from the US propaganda’s position.

According to him, the general perception of Iran as a threat to
regional security is purely American perception having nothing to do
with the reality. "Furthermore, why on earth should Iran attack any
European country?" the scientists said.

The seminar covered a number of regional issues related to military
and political aspects of the so-called Iranian problem, as well as
the US-Iran relations and domestic processes in Iran.

One Of Main Demands Of National Movement Is Complete Disclosure Of M

ONE OF MAIN DEMANDS OF NATIONAL MOVEMENT IS COMPLETE DISCLOSURE OF MARCH 1 EVENTS

NOYAN TAPAN

Ju ly 8
YEREVAN

One of the main demands of the National Movement (NM) headed by first
RA President Levon Ter-Petrosian is complete disclosure of the March 1
events. Stating this at the July 8 press conference, Arman Musinian,
NM Center Spokesperson, said: "This case must not be slurred over,
all those guilty for this case should be called for liability by the
strictest requirements of the law."

According to A. Musinian, President of that time Robert Kocharian
should be invited as the person playing the main part in those events
by not only the NA ad hoc commission on study of the March 1 events,
but also by the Special Investigation Service of Police. It was also
mentioned that if L.

Ter-Petrosian can be useful for the disclosure of the March 1 events
with any thing, he has no problem.

According to A. Musinian, NM has changed its position to some
extent in the issue of local self-government bodies and in the
Arabkir prefect’s elections to be held in September will support
the candidature of Zharangutiun (Heritage) party representative Zoya
Tadevosian if a decision to nominate the latter is made. "Our friends
from Zharangutiun have done much work in this period, especially after
March 1," he said. It was also mentioned that support of political
forces should be mutual.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=115415

Jihad By The Numbers

JIHAD BY THE NUMBERS

Family Security Matters
July 3, 2008
NJ

In his masterful second volume study of Hitler, Hitler, 1936-1945:
Nemesis, Ian Kershaw discusses a phenomenon called "working towards
the Fuhrer," in which every Nazi Party organization, member and office
automatically, with little or no prompting or prodding by Hitler or his
inner circle, worked to realize the ends and policies articulated by
Hitler before and after he rose to power in 1933. It was automatic,
because to disagree with or have reservations about a single,
even minor aspect of Nazi ideology was to court reprimand, censure,
dismissal, or even death. Agreement with those ends and policies was
nearly a secondary motivation behind any Party member’s actions. He
was compelled to act, regardless of the consequences. The ideology
commanded it, and the Fuhrer’s will and vision were irresistible,
because there was little or no self to resist them.

As Party members who disagreed or expressed reservations were
dismissed, or abandoned the Party, fled, committed suicide, or were
murdered, monsters of the first rank filled the vacuum to formulate
and enact policies that more completely "worked towards the Fuhrer,"
monsters such as Heinrich Himmler, Hermann Göring, Joachim von
Ribbentrop, and Joseph Goebbels. When all the checks within the Party
against total irrationality in domestic and foreign policies were
removed or fell into disrepute, total irrationality took over totally.

But the average Party member strived to satisfy Hitler, regardless
of how minor or major the action and regardless if it stood to be
acknowledged or rewarded. To be a true, loyal, above-suspicion Nazi
meant the near total surrender of one’s ego, mind and self, and to
substitute them with Hitler’s own.

Of course, an Ellsworth Toohey might say that the joke was on the
rank-and-file Nazi: he would claim that Hitler was essentially
selfless, and that what little mind Hitler possessed was founded on
what he thought his followers and "the people" wanted and expected of
him as prophet and dictator. Ayn Rand, in The Fountainhead, describes
that phenomenon through Toohey:

"…A world of obedience and of unity. A world where the thought of
each man will not be his own, but an attempt to guess the thought
in the brain of his neighbor, who’ll have no thought of his own but
an attempt to guess the thought of the next neighbor who’ll have no
thought – and so on…around the globe. Since all must serve all. A
world in which man will not work for so innocent an incentive as money,
but for that headless monster – prestige. The approval of his fellows –
their good opinion – the opinion of men who’ll be allowed to hold no
opinion. An octopus, all tentacles and no brain….An average drawn
upon zeroes…." (1).

It is no accident or fluke of history that Islamists – Hamas,
Hezbollah, Ahmadinejad, Saudi Wahhabists, the whole ménage of
Islamists and Jihadists — admire both Hitler and Nazism. Their
hatred of Jews and Israel is merely one facet of that pathology. As
Nazism required the complete submission of the individual to Party
ideology and an unthinking, unwavering deference to Hitler, Islam
requires the complete submission of the individual to Islam and an
unthinking, unwavering deference to Allah and Mohammed. Islamists
have long recognized that both the method and the ends of Nazism
were in complete agreement and practical accord with their own. The
"mechanics" of a functioning Islam differ in no fundamental way from
the "mechanics" of a functioning Nazism or any other brand of total
collectivism, as described by Toohey above. (2)

(One historical note: Kershaw points out that Hitler once entertained
the idea of solving the "Jewish Question" by helping to establish a
Jewish state in Palestine, where all German and other European Jews
would be forcibly "relocated" and presumably – hopefully – perish in a
wasteland of desert and hostile Arabs. He dismissed the idea because he
feared that such a state could possibly become a political adversary
dedicated to destroying Germany. Historically, the ironic joke is on
Hitler. He destroyed Germany and the Jews turned the wasteland into
a productive, prosperous garden.)

With that in mind, here is a set of significant statistics forwarded to
me by a friend. It charts the progression of Islamic Jihad, both soft
and hard methods, whose purpose is to establish a global caliphate,
especially in the West.

It begins by stating:

"Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system."

I would disagree. It is definitely a religion and a political system
combined. Any attempt to "separate" mosque and state would emasculate
Islam. I have argued this point in past commentaries and will not
dwell on it here. And cults, if not opposed by reason and kept by
it on the far fringes of a civilized society, have a tendency to
become religions that may become state policies. Ecology was once a
"cult." Today we have the Environmental Protection Agency.

It goes on to state:

"Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military
components. The religious component is a beard for all the other
components."

Or a mask, or a ruse. But no one should doubt how seriously Islamists
and Muslims in general take the religious component. Islam is a
barbaric but fully integrated system, perhaps more lethally integrated
than was Nazism.

"Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country
to agitate for their so-called ‘religious rights.’"

I would defend anyone’s right to believe in Islam. The question
is: How could one truly practice Islam without declaring Jihad on
others? After a Muslim has won the "internal struggle" or Jihad within
himself, the next step is to wage it against all others. To refrain
from that part of Jihad is to risk the accusation of being a slacker
or pseudo-Muslim. From the first stage to the last, all such effort
constitutes "working towards the Prophet and Allah."

"When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agreed to
‘the reasonable’ Muslims demands for their ‘religious rights,’ they
also get the other components under the table. Here’s how it works
(percentages source: CIA: The World Fact Book, 2007).

"As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given
country it will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a
threat to anyone…."

Here is where it becomes interesting. Note throughout the exponential
scale of Islamic influence as the percentage of Muslim population
per country increases. Comments in square brackets are my corrective
interjections.

United States: 1.0 Australia: 1.5 Canada: 1.9 China: 1.0-2.0 Italy:
1.5 Norway: 1.8

"At 2% and 3% they [Muslims] begin to proselytize from other ethnic
minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the
jails and among street gangs."

Denmark: 2.0 Germany: 3.7 United Kingdom: 2.7 Spain: 4.0 Italy: 4.6

"From 5% on they [Muslims] exercise an inordinate influence in
proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push
for the introduction of halal ("clean" by Islamic standards) food,
thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase
pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves –
along with threats for failure to comply (United States)."

France: 8.0 Philippines: 5.0 Sweden: 5.0 Switzerland: 4.3 The
Netherlands: 5.5 Trinidad & Tobago: 5.8

"At this point, they [Muslims] will work to get the ruling government
to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, or Islamic law. The
ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish
Sharia law over the entire world.

"When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase
lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris –
car burning). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result
in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam, Denmark – Mohammed cartoons,
murder of Theo van Gogh)."

Guyana: 10.0 India: 13.4 Israel: 16.0 Kenya: 10.0 Russia: 10.0-15.0

The one anomaly in this set of statistics is Israel, which has not
experienced uprisings and threats of violence. Its Arab or Muslim
population enjoys equal political rights with Jewish Israelis. The
suicide bombings and rocket attacks that have killed hundreds have
been perpetrated by outsiders.

"After reaching 20% [of a population] expect hair-trigger rioting,
Jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue
burning:

Ethiopia: 32.8

"After 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks
and ongoing militia warfare:"

Bosnia: 40.0 Chad: 53.1 Lebanon: 59.7

"From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and
other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia
Law as a weapon and jizya, the tax placed on [conquered] infidels:"

Albania: 70.0 Malaysia: 60.4 Qatar: 77.5 Sudan: 70.0

"After 80%, expect state-run ethnic cleansing and genocide:"

Bangladesh: 83.0 Egypt: 90.0 Gaza: 98.7 Indonesia: 86.1 Iran: 98.0
Iraq: 97.0 Jordan: 92.0 Morocco: 98.7 Pakistan: 97.0 Palestine: 99.0
Syria: 90.0 Tajikistan: 90.0 Turkey: 99.8 United Arab Emirates: 96.0

I question the inclusion of "Palestine" in this set. "Palestine"
simply means space occupied by stateless "Palestinians" in Gaza and
the West Bank, and is the name of the state which Islamists wish to
replace Israel, once it is destroyed. Turkey, after decades of having a
secular, non-religious government, is beginning to turn "religious,"
and seems to be yearning for the kind of Muslim government that
cleansed the country in 1915 of non-Muslim Armenians in a genocide
that predates the Holocaust.

"100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ – the Islamic House
of Peace’ [more correctly, dar-al-Islam, or Land of Islam]. There is
supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim."

Afghanistan: 100.0 Saudi Arabia: 100.0 Somalia: 100.0 Yemen: 99.9

"Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims
then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

"’Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was
me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family
against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the
tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel.’ Leon Uris,
The Haj.

"It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as
France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based
on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community
at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national
average[s] would indicate.

"Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book, Slavery, Terrorism and Islam:
The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat."

Hammond’s book is sponsored by the Frontline Fellowship, a Christian
organization, and the book itself was published by Christian Liberty
Books. The Frontline website contains several endorsements of the
book by clerics and missionaries. The quoted paragraphs above were
"adapted" from Hammond’s book (by whom, is unknown), and not very
professionally. The statistics themselves were compiled by the CIA
and used in the book.

The first paragraph of the Frontline ad for the book reads:

In his masterful second volume study of Hitler, Hitler, 1936-1945:
Nemesis, Ian Kershaw discusses a phenomenon called "working towards
the Fuhrer," in which every Nazi Party organization, member and office
automatically, with little or no prompting or prodding by Hitler or his
inner circle, worked to realize the ends and policies articulated by
Hitler before and after he rose to power in 1933. It was automatic,
because to disagree with or have reservations about a single,
even minor aspect of Nazi ideology was to court reprimand, censure,
dismissal, or even death. Agreement with those ends and policies was
nearly a secondary motivation behind any Party member’s actions. He
was compelled to act, regardless of the consequences. The ideology
commanded it, and the Fuhrer’s will and vision were irresistible,
because there was little or no self to resist them.

As Party members who disagreed or expressed reservations were
dismissed, or abandoned the Party, fled, committed suicide, or were
murdered, monsters of the first rank filled the vacuum to formulate
and enact policies that more completely "worked towards the Fuhrer,"
monsters such as Heinrich Himmler, Hermann Göring, Joachim von
Ribbentrop, and Joseph Goebbels. When all the checks within the Party
against total irrationality in domestic and foreign policies were
removed or fell into disrepute, total irrationality took over totally.

But the average Party member strived to satisfy Hitler, regardless
of how minor or major the action and regardless if it stood to be
acknowledged or rewarded. To be a true, loyal, above-suspicion Nazi
meant the near total surrender of one’s ego, mind and self, and to
substitute them with Hitler’s own.

Of course, an Ellsworth Toohey might say that the joke was on the
rank-and-file Nazi: he would claim that Hitler was essentially
selfless, and that what little mind Hitler possessed was founded on
what he thought his followers and "the people" wanted and expected of
him as prophet and dictator. Ayn Rand, in The Fountainhead, describes
that phenomenon through Toohey: "…A world of obedience and of
unity. A world where the thought of each man will not be his own,
but an attempt to guess the thought in the brain of his neighbor,
who’ll have no thought of his own but an attempt to guess the thought
of the next neighbor who’ll have no thought – and so on…around the
globe. Since all must serve all. A world in which man will not work
for so innocent an incentive as money, but for that headless monster
– prestige. The approval of his fellows – their good opinion – the
opinion of men who’ll be allowed to hold no opinion. An octopus,
all tentacles and no brain….An average drawn upon zeroes…." (1).

It is no accident or fluke of history that Islamists – Hamas,
Hezbollah, Ahmadinejad, Saudi Wahhabists, the whole ménage of
Islamists and Jihadists — admire both Hitler and Nazism. Their
hatred of Jews and Israel is merely one facet of that pathology. As
Nazism required the complete submission of the individual to Party
ideology and an unthinking, unwavering deference to Hitler, Islam
requires the complete submission of the individual to Islam and an
unthinking, unwavering deference to Allah and Mohammed. Islamists
have long recognized that both the method and the ends of Nazism
were in complete agreement and practical accord with their own. The
"mechanics" of a functioning Islam differ in no fundamental way from
the "mechanics" of a functioning Nazism or any other brand of total
collectivism, as described by Toohey above. (2)

(One historical note: Kershaw points out that Hitler once entertained
the idea of solving the "Jewish Question" by helping to establish a
Jewish state in Palestine, where all German and other European Jews
would be forcibly "relocated" and presumably – hopefully – perish in a
wasteland of desert and hostile Arabs. He dismissed the idea because he
feared that such a state could possibly become a political adversary
dedicated to destroying Germany. Historically, the ironic joke is on
Hitler. He destroyed Germany and the Jews turned the wasteland into
a productive, prosperous garden.)

With that in mind, here is a set of significant statistics forwarded to
me by a friend. It charts the progression of Islamic Jihad, both soft
and hard methods, whose purpose is to establish a global caliphate,
especially in the West.

It begins by stating: "Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It
is a complete system."

I would disagree. It is definitely a religion and a political system
combined. Any attempt to "separate" mosque and state would emasculate
Islam. I have argued this point in past commentaries and will not
dwell on it here. And cults, if not opposed by reason and kept by
it on the far fringes of a civilized society, have a tendency to
become religions that may become state policies. Ecology was once a
"cult." Today we have the Environmental Protection Agency.

It goes on to state: "Islam has religious, legal, political, economic
and military components. The religious component is a beard for all
the other components."

Or a mask, or a ruse. But no one should doubt how seriously Islamists
and Muslims in general take the religious component. Islam is a
barbaric but fully integrated system, perhaps more lethally integrated
than was Nazism.

"Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country
to agitate for their so-called ‘religious rights.’"

I would defend anyone’s right to believe in Islam. The question
is: How could one truly practice Islam without declaring Jihad on
others? After a Muslim has won the "internal struggle" or Jihad within
himself, the next step is to wage it against all others. To refrain
from that part of Jihad is to risk the accusation of being a slacker
or pseudo-Muslim. From the first stage to the last, all such effort
constitutes "working towards the Prophet and Allah."

"When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agreed to
‘the reasonable’ Muslims demands for their ‘religious rights,’ they
also get the other components under the table. Here’s how it works
(percentages source: CIA: The World Fact Book, 2007).

"As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given
country it will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a
threat to anyone…."

Here is where it becomes interesting. Note throughout the exponential
scale of Islamic influence as the percentage of Muslim population
per country increases. Comments in square brackets are my corrective
interjections.

United States: 1.0 Australia: 1.5 Canada: 1.9 China: 1.0-2.0 Italy:
1.5 Norway: 1.8 "At 2% and 3% they [Muslims] begin to proselytize from
other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting
from the jails and among street gangs."

Denmark: 2.0 Germany: 3.7 United Kingdom: 2.7 Spain: 4.0 Italy:
4.6 "From 5% on they [Muslims] exercise an inordinate influence in
proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push
for the introduction of halal ("clean" by Islamic standards) food,
thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase
pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves –
along with threats for failure to comply (United States)."

France: 8.0 Philippines: 5.0 Sweden: 5.0 Switzerland: 4.3 The
Netherlands: 5.5 Trinidad & Tobago: 5.8 "At this point, they [Muslims]
will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves
under Sharia, or Islamic law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to
convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

"When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase
lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris –
car burning). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result
in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam, Denmark – Mohammed cartoons,
murder of Theo van Gogh)."

Guyana: 10.0 India: 13.4 Israel: 16.0 Kenya: 10.0 Russia: 10.0-15.0

The one anomaly in this set of statistics is Israel, which has not
experienced uprisings and threats of violence. Its Arab or Muslim
population enjoys equal political rights with Jewish Israelis. The
suicide bombings and rocket attacks that have killed hundreds have
been perpetrated by outsiders.

"After reaching 20% [of a population] expect hair-trigger rioting,
Jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue
burning:

Ethiopia: 32.8 "After 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic
terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:"

Bosnia: 40.0 Chad: 53.1 Lebanon: 59.7 "From 60% you may expect
unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic
ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and jizya,
the tax placed on [conquered] infidels:"

Albania: 70.0 Malaysia: 60.4 Qatar: 77.5 Sudan: 70.0 "After 80%,
expect state-run ethnic cleansing and genocide:"

Bangladesh: 83.0 Egypt: 90.0 Gaza: 98.7 Indonesia: 86.1 Iran: 98.0
Iraq: 97.0 Jordan: 92.0 Morocco: 98.7 Pakistan: 97.0 Palestine: 99.0
Syria: 90.0 Tajikistan: 90.0 Turkey: 99.8 United Arab Emirates: 96.0

I question the inclusion of "Palestine" in this set. "Palestine"
simply means space occupied by stateless "Palestinians" in Gaza and
the West Bank, and is the name of the state which Islamists wish to
replace Israel, once it is destroyed. Turkey, after decades of having a
secular, non-religious government, is beginning to turn "religious,"
and seems to be yearning for the kind of Muslim government that
cleansed the country in 1915 of non-Muslim Armenians in a genocide
that predates the Holocaust.

"100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ – the Islamic House
of Peace’ [more correctly, dar-al-Islam, or Land of Islam]. There is
supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim."

Afghanistan: 100.0 Saudi Arabia: 100.0 Somalia: 100.0 Yemen: 99.9

"Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims
then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

"’Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was
me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family
against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the
tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel.’ Leon Uris,
The Haj.

"It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as
France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based
on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community
at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national
average[s] would indicate.

"Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book, Slavery, Terrorism and Islam:
The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat."

Hammond’s book is sponsored by the Frontline Fellowship, a Christian
organization, and the book itself was published by Christian Liberty
Books. The Frontline website contains several endorsements of the
book by clerics and missionaries. The quoted paragraphs above were
"adapted" from Hammond’s book (by whom, is unknown), and not very
professionally. The statistics themselves were compiled by the CIA
and used in the book.

The first paragraph of the Frontline ad for the book reads: "Dr. Peter
Hammond’s new book…is a fascinating, well illustrated and thoroughly
documented response to the relentless anti-Christian propaganda that
has been generated by Muslim and Marxist groups and by Hollywood
film makers…."

For a detailed exposé of Islam’s Marxist affiliation – as
distinguished from its symbiosis with Nazism – see Daniel Pipes’
"[The Islamist-Leftist] Allied Menace," of July 15th.

So, regardless of the book’s Christian orientation, the statistics
Hammond uses to cite the various Muslim populations in each country
can be taken as reliable, as well as the prefatory remarks before each
set of percentages. There is certainly a demonstrable and observable
corollary between a country’s Muslim population and the influence it
begins to have or has had on its government, politics and culture.

The Islamists are coolly "working towards the Prophet and Allah"
as shown in the numbers above. Meanwhile, our policymakers appear
to be a succession of compliant, pragmatic, non-judgmental zeroes
blindly working towards the conquest and extinction of the West.

(1) The Fountainhead, pp. 667-668, Plume-Penguin Centennial Edition.

(2) "During the 1930s, Palestinian Arabs under the leadership of
the Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, had embraced a
great deal of Nazi ideology." From Denis MacEoin’s "Tactical Hudna
and Islamist Intolerance," Middle East Quarterly, Summer 2008.

Family Security Matters Contributing Editor Edward Cline is the
author of a number of novels, and his essays, books reviews,
and other nonfiction have appeared in a number of high-profile
periodicals. Feedback: [email protected].

For a detailed exposé of Islam’s Marxist affiliation – as
distinguished from its symbiosis with Nazism – see Daniel Pipes’
"[The Islamist-Leftist] Allied Menace," of July 15th.

So, regardless of the book’s Christian orientation, the statistics
Hammond uses to cite the various Muslim populations in each country
can be taken as reliable, as well as the prefatory remarks before each
set of percentages. There is certainly a demonstrable and observable
corollary between a country’s Muslim population and the influence it
begins to have or has had on its government, politics and culture.

The Islamists are coolly "working towards the Prophet and Allah"
as shown in the numbers above. Meanwhile, our policymakers appear
to be a succession of compliant, pragmatic, non-judgmental zeroes
blindly working towards the conquest and extinction of the West.

(1) The Fountainhead, pp. 667-668, Plume-Penguin Centennial Edition.

(2) "During the 1930s, Palestinian Arabs under the leadership of
the Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, had embraced a
great deal of Nazi ideology." From Denis MacEoin’s "Tactical Hudna
and Islamist Intolerance," Middle East Quarterly, Summer 2008.

Family Security Matters Contributing Editor Edward Cline is the
author of a number of novels, and his essays, books reviews,
and other nonfiction have appeared in a number of high-profile
periodicals. Feedback: [email protected].

–Bo undary_(ID_zdUhDAyzw78DJ1d7mvnIqA)–

Baku: OSCE Chairman-In-Office And Armenian Foreign Minister Discusse

OSCE CHAIRMAN-IN-OFFICE AND ARMENIAN FOREIGN MINISTER DISCUSSES SETTLEMENT OF NAGORNO KARABAKH CONFLICT

Azeri Press Agency
03 Jul 2008
Azerbaijan

Baku. Tamara Grigoryeva-APA. Armenian foreign minister Edward
Nalbandian and OSCE Chairman-in-office, Foreign Minister of Finland
Alexander Stubb met yesterday in Finland, APA reports.

Heikki Talvitie, Special Envoy of the OSCE Chairman-in-office
participated in the meeting as well. The meeting covered the ongoing
developments in OSCE region, settlement process of Nagorno Karabakh
conflict, bilateral relations between the two countries, European
Neighborhood Police, East Partnership plan.

According To RA Foreign Minister, Parliamentary Diplomacy Is Best Wa

ACCORDING TO RA FOREIGN MINISTER, PARLIAMENTARY DIPLOMACY IS BEST WAY OF DEVELOPMENT OF INTERSTATE RELATIONS

NOYAN TAPAN

Ju ly 2

The current state of Armenian and German parliaments’ cooperation
and its prospects, issues related to cooperation of National Assembly
and Bundestag deputies at international organizations’ parliamentary
assemblies were discussed during the July 1 meeting of RA Foreign
Minister Edward Nalbandian, who is in Berlin on an official visit,
with Chairman of Bundestag’s Caucasus deputy group Steffen Reiche.

S. Reiche presented the deputy group’s initiatives, in particular,
the preparatory work of opening Joseph Lepsius House-Museum in
Potsdam. He invited the RA Foreign Minister to take part in the
official opening ceremony.

E. Nalbandian said that parliamentary diplomacy is one of the
best ways of developing relations between the states. He welcomed
Bundestag deputies’ initiatives in the respect of further deepening
of Armenian-German relations.

At the German deputy’s request the RA Foreign Minister presented
Armenian side’s approaches over the normalization of Armenian-Turkish
relations, as well as the prospects of the negotiations process of
Nagorno Karabakh settlement.

As Noyan Tapan was informed by the RA Foreign Ministry Press and
Information Department, the same day E. Nalbandian also met with
Gunter Pilarski, the Chairman of the Chronimet company. The investment
programs implemented by the company in Armenia and the prospects of
their extension were discussed during the meeting.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=115139

PACE Does Not Approve Demand Of Monitoring Committee For Immediate P

PACE DOES NOT APPROVE DEMAND OF MONITORING COMMITTEE FOR IMMEDIATE PROVISION OF LICENSE FOR BROADCASTING TO A1+ TV COMPANY

ArmInfo
2008-06-26 12:36:00

PACE does not approve the demand of the Monitoring Committee for
immediate provision of a license for broadcasting to A1+ TV Company.

ArmInfo correspondent from Strasbourg reports that Assembly amended the
demand and replaced it with the necessity of contributing to e-media
pluralism, to open and fair procedure of licensing in conformity with
the protocols of European Court for Human Rights and the directives of
the CE Committee of Ministers on licensing of TV and radio companies.

Explaining the necessity of such amendment, Head of the Armenian
delegation to PACE David Haroutunyan said: ‘In conformity with the
provisions of the effective legislation, it is impossible to get a
license for broadcasting evading the law’.

US Shares Europe’S Hopes For Normalization Of Armenian-Turkish Relat

US SHARES EUROPE’S HOPES FOR NORMALIZATION OF ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS

armradio.am
26.06.2008 12:06

"We share our European Allies’ hope that Turkey and Armenia will soon
normalize their relations," US Assistant Secretary of State Matthew
Bryza said, delivering a lecture on invigorating the U.S.-Turkey
strategic partnership at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

"This will involve a decision by Turkey to restore diplomatic relations
and reopen its border with Armenia, and Armenia’s recognition of its
existing border with Turkey. We hope such steps will also lead to
a heartfelt discussion of the shared and tragic past of these two
friends of the United States," the diplomat said.