Calmy-Rey In Armenien Oel Koennte Im Konflikt Um Berg-Karabach Karte

CALMY-REY IN ARMENIEN OEL KOENNTE IM KONFLIKT UM BERG-KARABACH KARTEN
neu mischen Hintergrund Von Anja Germond, SDA

Schweizerische Depeschenagentur AG (SDA)
SDA – Basisdienst Deutsch
9. Juni 2006

Bern

Der Konflikt um Berg-Karabach, den Bundesraetin Micheline Calmy-Rey
beim Besuch in Armenien ansprechen moechte, ist einer der aeltesten
in Europa. Ein Abkommen ist nicht in Sicht, doch durch das Oel von
Baku koennten die Karten neu gemischt werden.

Aserbaidschan erlebt derzeit einen Wirtschaftsboom wegen seiner
Einkuenfte aus der Oelindustrie. Die Pipeline Baku-Tiflis-Ceyhan (BTC)
zwischen Aserbaidschan un der Tuerkei ist seit dem 27. Mai in Betrieb
und wird am Dienstag eingeweiht. Die 1767 Kilometer lange Roehre soll
jaehrlich bis zu 50 Millionen Tonnen Oel transportieren.

Amerikanische Interessen

"Die wirtschaftlichen Gewinne koennten sich im Konflikt um die Region
Berg-Karabach zu Gunsten Aserbaidschans auswirken", sagt der fruehere
Staatssekretaer Edouard Brunner gegenueber der Nachrichtenagentur
SDA. Der Schweizer Ex-Spitzendiplomat war 1995 als Sondergesandter
der UNO in die suedkaukasischen Laender gereist.

Das Pipeline-Projekt wird von der US-Regierung unterstuetzt und
duerfte die wirtschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen Baku und Washington
befluegeln. Gemaess Analysten sind die USA namentlich an einer Loesung
des Konflikts interessiert, damit der Oeltransport nicht durch einen
neuen Krieg gefaehrdet wird.

Ein wirtschaftlich erstarktes Aserbaidschan werde auch die Mittel
haben, militaerisch aufzuruesten, sagt Brunner. Bisher haetten die
Armenier aufgrund militaerischer Ueberlegenheit die Gefechte jeweils
gewonnen.

Hunderttausende in Fluechtlingslagern

Armenien und Aserbaidschan streiten sich seit langem um die Region
Berg-Karabach. Berg-Karabach gehoert voelkerrechtlich zu Aserbaidschan,
historisch gesehen ist die Region jedoch Teil von Armenien.

1988 eskalierte der schwelende Konflikt nach anti-armenischen Pogromen
in Aserbaidschan in einen offenen Krieg, in dessen Verlauf beide
Seiten ethnische Saeuberungen vornahmen.

Nach auf dem Internet-Protal Wikipedia publizierten Schaetzungen
starben rund 17 000 Armenier und 25 000 Aserbaidschaner.

Hunderttausende wurden zu Fluechtlingen. Seit 1994 ruhen die Waffen.

Instrument fuer Propaganda

Die Situation der Vertriebenen in Aserbaidschan koennte sich durch
die groesseren finanziellen Ressourcen verbessern. In den letzten
Jahren habe der von den Behoerden geaeufnete Oelfonds beigetragen
zum Aufbau von Haeusern, Schulen und Spitaelern, heisst es auf der
Internet-Seite der aserbaidschanischen Regierung.

Verschiedene Beobachter geben zu bedenken, dass Aserbaidschan die
Fluechtlinge als Propagandainstrument missbrauche. Das Land mache
nichts zur Verbesserung der Situation in den Fluechtlingslagern,
sagt Ernst Muehlemann, frueher fuer die Schweiz im Europarat, derzeit
Vizepraesident des Ost-West-Forums.

Aussenministerin Calmy-Rey hatte bereits im Februar in Aserbaidschan
ein Lager mit Fluechtlingen aus Berg-Karabach besucht. Um "Symmetrie"
herzustellen, kuendigte sie danach an, auch nach Armenien zu reisen.

Die Schweiz hat wiederholt als Mediatorin zwischen den Konfliktparteien
vermittelt.

Indian Gold Firm Forced To Drop Plans For New Armenia Plant

INDIAN GOLD FIRM FORCED TO DROP PLANS FOR NEW ARMENIA PLANT
By Anna Saghabalian and Emil Danielyan

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
June 15 2006

An Indian-controlled company developing the bulk of Armenia’s gold
reserves said Wednesday that it has abandoned plans to build a new
ore processing plant near the ecologically vital Lake Sevan due to
strong opposition from the Armenian government and environmentalists.

Sterlite Gold had asked the government to allow it to build the new
facility near its main gold mines at Zod, eastern Armenia, with the
aim of reducing transportation costs which the British-registered
firm claims are too high. Its Armenian subsidiary, the Ararat Gold
Recovery Company (AGRC), has until now processed ore at a Soviet-era
plant located in the southern town of Ararat.

The Armenian Ministry of Environment and local environment protection
groups have been strongly opposed to the $85 million project,
citing Zod’s proximity to Sevan. They argue that ore processing is
accompanied by emissions of potassium cyanide, a highly poisonous
substance that can wreak havoc on a lake which is central to Armenia’s
entire ecosystem.

Sterlite, 52 percent of which is owned by Indian tycoon Anil Agarwal,
has tried hard to allay those fears over the past year but appears
to have failed to secure government permission for the proposed plant
relocation. Its chief executive, B. K. Sharma, said in Yerevan that the
company has now asked the government to suggest alternative locations
for a new AGRC plant.

Environment Minister Vartan Ayvazian scoffed at the idea on Tuesday,
saying that making such suggestions "it is not the government’s job."

Ayvazian also renewed his allegations that Sterlite failed to honor
its investment commitments and hid nearly one million metric tons of
gold from Armenian tax authorities.

Speaking to journalists, Sharma and AGRC executives denied the
charges. "In order to obtain one ton of gold you have to dig up several
million tons of soil," said a company lawyer, Armen Ter-Tachatian. "You
just can’t hide that."

Ayvazian’s claims are apparently based on an inspection conducted
by his ministry’s Ecological Inspectorate at AGRC’s mines in Zod
and Meghradzor, central Armenia. In a June 2004 report, the agency
accused the Indians of underreporting more than two metric tons of
gold extracted from those mines and asked Armenia’s Office of the
Prosecutor-General to launch a criminal investigation.

However, the Environment Ministry dropped its own claims after it was
taken to court by AGRC. The latter reportedly paid a $500,000 fine
in an out-of-court settlement reached with the ministry in March 2005.

Sterlite has been dogged by controversy ever since its 2002 takeover
of AGRC, until then a joint venture of the Armenian government and
the Canadian company First Dynasty Mines. It pledged to breathe
a new life into the Armenian gold industry by making large-scale
investments and significantly boosting production levels. However,
AGRC’s output has since declined considerably despite a surge in the
international price of gold, raising questions about the credibility
of the foreign investor.

Sharma revealed that Agarwal has all but acquired the remaining
48 percent of Sterlite’s stock from the mostly Canadian minority
shareholders and will incorporate the company into his Vedanta
Resources metals conglomerate.

But according to a Western mining industry source, the deal may well
be blocked by Canadian state regulators and minority shareholders
furious with his perceived mismanagement of Sterlite. The company’s
share price stood $3.5 in 1997 and has since plummeted to below 20
U.S. cents. The source also said Agarwal would like to pull out of
Armenia but has so far failed to find any buyers for AGRC.

Bilateral Meetings Of Representatives Of Imf Dutch Group Member Stat

BILATERAL MEETINGS OF REPRESENTATIVES OF IMF DUTCH GROUP MEMBER STATES TO TAKE PLACE IN YEREVAN ON JUNE 18

Noyan Tapan
Jun 14 2006

YEREVAN, JUNE 14, NOYAN TAPAN. Parliamentary hearings on cooperation
between Armenia and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) will
be held in the RA National Assembly on June 16. During the event,
representatives of the IMF, the RA Ministry of Finance and Economy and
the Central Bank of Armenia (CBA) will make speeches. Olga Stankova,
of the IMF Foreign Relations Department, stated this during a seminar
"The Role of IMF in Transitional Economies" on June 14.

According to her, IMF’s delegation will meet with the RA President,
government members and the Armenian Governor to IMF on June 17. On
June 18, bilateral meetings of representatives of the IMF Dutch Group
members states (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus,
Armenia, Israel, the Netherlands, Macedonia, Moldova, Romania,
Ukraine) will take place to discuss issues related to mutual trade,
tax regimes and obligations towards each other.

To recap, Armenia joined the IMF in May 1992, the country’s quota
in the IMF currently makes 92 mln SDR (about 135 mln USD) or 0.04%
of the overall quota. Armenia’s right of vote is 1.17 votes or 0.05%
of the total number of votes. The total amount of IMF’s credits and
loans to Armenia makes 123 mln 320 thousand SDR.

The Community’s Museum: Art and History at the Ararat-Eskijian Museu

The Community’s Museum: Art and History at the Ararat-Eskijian Museum
By Ramela Grigorian Abbamontian

Critics’ Forum
Visual Arts
6/10/06

Like many of the artifacts contained within, the Ararat-Eskijian
Museum (AEM) is a hidden treasure awaiting discovery. Nestled
quietly in Mission Hills on the campus of The Ararat Home of Los
Angeles, the museum is the physical manifestation of the dream of
one individual, genocide survivor Luther Eskijian, who created the
museum “to preserve our Armenian culture and historical treasures
for generations to come.”

In 1989, at the age of 78, genocide survivor Luther Eskijian
embarked on a quest to realize his 30-year-old dream of creating a
museum where his collection could be used to preserve the cultural
identity of the Armenians. “I have been a collector of historical
artifacts, coins, maps, art, documents and books since my early
childhood. I was drawn to collecting these items first for their
historical value, second, because of their beauty, and finally, to
preserve these collections for others to enjoy,” notes Eskijian in
the Founder’s Statement. Using his connection with the Ararat Home
(as its volunteer advisor of many years), he proposed adding a
museum and a sanctuary to the site. Working diligently as architect
and general contractor for about four years, Eskijian, at the age of
82, witnessed the fruits of his dream when the museum opened its
doors in 1993.

The mission of the museum is clearly articulated on its website
(): “The Ararat-Eskijian Museum ~E was
created to enrich, inspire and educate the community through the
display of artworks and exhibits, presentation of programs, and
collection of research materials featuring the history and cultural
heritage of the Armenian people.” A detailed list that follows
expounds how the museum aims to achieve this mission, including
collecting valuable items, accepting the community’s contributions
of artifacts, focusing on research and education, housing a library
(of primarily genocide-related materials), and offering cultural
programs. These are ambitious aims for a tiny museum, yet as a
review of its most recent activities will soon illustrate, the
museum appears to tirelessly strive for these goals. These efforts
fill a critical need because, as its mission statement reminds us,
the museum “serves the largest Armenian community in the Diaspora
and is the only Armenian museum on the west coast.”

In its 6,000 square feet~Vrelatively small exhibition space~Vthe
museum’s impressive and eclectic collections include antiquities,
decorative arts, drawings, historical documents, musical
instruments, paintings, prints, rugs, sculptures, stamps, coins, and
textiles. Considering the inspiring story of the museum’s founder,
its collections, its programming, its role as a site of remembrance,
and its close relationship with the community, we might conclude
that though young and still nascent, the museum is nonetheless an
important thread in the fabric of the community and a powerful
vehicle of its preservation.

Like most small museums, AEM is staffed primarily by volunteers and
a few paid employees. The powerhouse behind the museum’s operations
is Maggie Mangassarian-Goschin, who began volunteering at the museum
in 1998 and has since dedicated countless hours to making its
mission a reality. In fact, she can easily be considered the
museum’s unpaid director and~Vas most directors in small museums will
attest~Vwears a number of different hats, including programming,
staffing, curating, and even housecleaning and maintenance. Though
the small group of staff and volunteers are clearly dedicated to the
museum, more volunteers are always needed to achieve the large-scale
goals of the museum.

A key feature, though not the entire focus, of the museum is its
presentation of the 1915 Armenian Genocide. Visitors to the museum
are greeted by the “Mother Armenia Rising Out of the Ashes,” the
bronze sculpture flanking the entrance. Dedicated to the victims as
well as survivors of the 1915 Genocide, this living memorial has
elicited a myriad of reactions from viewers, most notably prayers,
tears, and flowers placed at her feet. Museum staff has often
glimpsed the elderly residents of the Ararat Home deep in thought
beside the woman and child figure. One wonders: what are they
thinking and remembering? What are their personal stories? And
more to the point, who preserves them? These critical questions
further reinforce the essential role of the museum in the community.

In another section of the small area dedicated to the Genocide,
artists Nora Nalbandian and Guilda Deirmendjian have painted “The
Der Zor Memorial Mural,” a tortured desert landscape pervaded by
light and vibrant colors from above, in what seems to represent the
hope of God. A box of human bones retrieved on a Der Zor mission by
some museum members sits in front of the mural, a reminder of the
unmarked graves of the victims. Initially, the alcove was intended
as a silent site of meditation. Yet as the number of non-Armenian
visitors increased, so did their questions. “What is this mural
about?” “Where are the bones from?” The museum has since
recognized the visitors’ concerns and has added extensive wall text
and photographic reproductions to tell the story of the Genocide.
Though the text at times almost overpowers the silent testimony of
memory, it is a necessary addition, since one of the museum’s goals,
as Goschin reiterated in a recent interview, is to introduce
Armenian culture and history to the non-Armenian public. Without
the labels, there is always the risk that visitors would admire the
objects simply for their beauty, instead of as emblems of historical
value.

The rest of the collection, as delineated earlier, is quite diverse~V
not uncommon among collectors like Eskijian, who amass an assortment
of objects through the years. That large collection of objects,
along with the museum’s small exhibition space, poses a challenge in
creating appropriate and cohesive displays. But surprisingly, the
varied selection also presents a more expansive view of Armenian
history, marking its origins (the oldest items date from 2500 years
ago to the Urartian and Hittite periods), its Christian faith, its
persecution, and its contributions to various neighboring countries.

Like its collection, the museum’s programs are also eclectic and
varied, and include film screenings, art exhibitions, lectures, and
musical performances. Its programming has burgeoned rapidly in the
last couple of years (a look at the website’s Events section will
confirm this), triggered~Vaccording to Goschin~Vby the exhibition
organized by three UCLA graduate students who temporarily adopted
the museum to curate a student art exhibition entitled “In
Celebration of Life: Armenian Identity and Culture of the Diaspora”
(April 2002).

The museum’s impressive list of programs features such prominent
scholars and artists as filmmaker Michael Hagopian, historian George
Bournoutian, art historian Levon Chookaszian, and genocide scholar
Vahakn Dadrian. (Audience numbers at these events number anywhere
from 50 to 100.) Another step in the right direction has been the
museum’s recent collaboration with other major Armenian
institutions, a move they intend to~Vand in fact, should~Vpursue, in
order to introduce the museum to new audiences and continue offering
quality programs. Notably, AEM has joined forced with NAASR
(National Association for Armenian Studies and Research) and
recently jointly hosted the lecture, “`Kiss My Children’s Eyes’: A
Search for Answers to the Armenian Genocide through One Remarkable
Photograph” (March 2006). The lecture featured Pulitzer-Prize
winning Boston Globe investigative journalist Stephen Kurkjian, who
discussed his quest to identify the group of Armenian men standing
under Turkish guard in front of a building in Gesaria (Caesarea) in
1915.

Currently, the museum is in the midst of preparing a teacher
workshop for the Fall to introduce teachers~Vfirst from Armenian
private schools and then from area public schools~Vto the collections
and the different ways of integrating the various items in the
collection into educational courses, including Social Studies,
History and English. Also in the works are a High School Volunteer
Program and the continuing development of relations with university
professors to help them encourage their students to visit the
museum. Another long-term goal of the museum is supporting local
artists. To that end, the museum recently curated “The Visual
Poetry of the Homeland: The Photographs of Vahé Peroomian and Ara
Meshkanbarian,” (September to October 2005). In the
accompanying “Dialogues with the Artists: Interview and Reception,”
the public was introduced more intimately to the artists’ motives
and inspirations. While the museum would like to do more in terms
of supporting local artists, it does not yet have the manpower,
time, or funding to organize exhibitions on a more consistent basis.

Founder Eskijian reminds the public on the museum’s website
that, “The Ararat-Eskijian Museum belongs to all Armenians.” And in
its mission statement, the museum “encourages the community to
contribute historical artifacts and actively participate in the
preservation of family histories and experiences.” In this way, the
museum has become a living repository, each donated item breathing
new life into its growing collection.

While the museum endeavors to be a place for the community, it also
desperately needs support. This need is especially critical for a
museum dedicated to a small ethnic community. Ideally, a reciprocal
relationship should exist between the two~Vthe museum preserving the
community’s culture and heritage and allowing it to take pride in
its accomplishments, with the community in turn allowing the museum
to thrive with its support. In Ron Chew’s article “In Praise of the
Small Museum” (Museum News, March/April 2002, p.38), Steve Olson (at
the time of the article, Assistant Director of the Museum of Church
History and Art) warns that “if you added up all the collections in
the country, numerically, most of the artifacts would be found in
small museums. If we don’t help the small museums, we’re literally
risking the fabric of our own heritage.”

Is the museum, then, solely for Armenians? Goschin and other museum
staff would reply that it is not, and like most Armenians, express
their desire to share their rich culture with others. But the
museum also inspires Armenian and non-Armenian visitors alike to
reflect on their own cultures and recognize similarities with those
of others by emphasizing the common need to preserve their stories
for future generations.

The museum is currently open only on Saturdays and Sundays, between
1 and 5 pm, as well as the first Tuesday of every month after the
Women’s Guild Luncheon at the Ararat Home. Admission to the museum
and to all events is free.

All Rights Reserved: Critics Forum, 2006

Ramela Grigorian Abbamontian is a PhD candidate in Art History at
UCLA. She has been with the Ararat-Eskijian Museum since 2001.

You can reach her or any of the other contributors to Critics’ Forum
at [email protected]. This and all other articles published
in this series are available online at To
sign up for a weekly electronic version of new articles, go to
Critics’ Forum is a group created to
discuss issues relating to Armenian art and culture in the Diaspora.

–Boundary_(ID_78PoL9E8gIdswM2Fv9zoZg)- –

www.ararat-eskijian-museum.com
www.criticsforum.org.
www.criticsforum.org/join.

International Group For Search Of Missing Arriving In NKR

INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR SEARCH OF MISSING ARRIVING IN NKR

PanARMENIAN.Net
13.06.2006 18:19 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ June 18-20, 2006 the International Working Group for
Search of Missing, Captives and Release of POWs is expected to arrive
in the Nagorno Karabakh conflict region. The purpose of the visit is
to activate the search of the missing and burial places. The group
will also work at the inquiries by the NKR, Armenian and Azerbaijan
state committees, reported Novosti-Armenia.

Azerbaijan’s Blackmail Does not Frighten Us

Panorama.am

14:00 09/06/06

AZERBAIJAN’S BLACKMAIL DOES NOT FRIGHTEN US

Prolongation of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict cannot be in the interest of
conflicting parties, Seiran Avagyan, president’s adviser told a
discussion with professor Alexander Manasyan today.

Avagyan mentioned that Armenia seeks to settle the issue via peaceful
methods and to sustain stability in the region. `In our region
military solutions have found their end. They will not be repeated any
more,’ he said. In his opinion, any element of postponing the
resolution will affect negatively especially the party that postpones
it.

His opponent Alexander Manasyan did not agree and said that Azerbaijan
purposefully postpones the conflict resolution meanwhile engaging in
large-scale propaganda. `Azerbaijan changes the nature of the problem
based on his own considerations,’ he noted.

S. Avagyan said that lead-time is a method of covering the
incapability to solve an issue. `Obviously, Azerbaijan takes his time
waiting for more favorable situation for it. But the blackmail of
Azerbaijan does not frighten the Armenian authorities,’ he
concluded./Panorama.am/

Support Helps if There is Quality

SUPPORT HELPS IF THERE IS QUALITY

Lragir.am
09 June 06

The parliamentary election 2007 may become a serious breakthrough from
the point of view of activity of public life in Armenia, stated
Khostrov Harutiunyan, the leader of the Christian Democratic Party of
Armenia June 9 at the National Press Club. He stresses the activity of
the public for the enhancement of the role of the National Assembly.
According to Khosrov Harutiunyan, as long as the society thinks that
all its problems are determined by a person, the parliament will have
a secondary role, and the public will remain outside political
processes like it is today. This reality is the reason why the
political party with 62 thousand members separated from the coalition
without an adequate reaction in the political sphere, thinks the
leader of the Christian Democratic Party.

`Therefore we should speak about the role of political parties in
political processes rather than unification of numbers, such as a
party of 100 thousand members joined a party of 62 thousand,’ says
Khosrov Harutiunyan. According to him, there is not a political party
today, which can fulfill effective governance alone, because it does
not have the necessary resource. Khosrov Harutiunyan thinks that the
society should focus on the political quality of a force before giving
its support to this force. If a political party has political quality,
giving support to it might lead to success, if it does not have a
political quality, support will not lead to anything good.

NK Polit Scientist: Bucharest Meeting of Presidents A Turning Point

KARABAKH POLITICAL SCIENTIST: BUCHAREST MEETING OF PRESIDENTS OF
ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN HAS BECOME TURNING TO SOME DEGREE

Stepanakert, May 7. ArmInfo. It turned out that very time before the
meeting of Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan, when talking about a
possible progress, many people imply signing of a specific document by
them for the conflict settlement. If treat these meetings in such a
way, progress achievement is very difficult, even impossible, David
Babayan, a Karabakh political scientist, said, commenting the meetings
of Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan in Bucharest.

Explaining his position, D. Babayan noted incomplete format of
negotiations, first of all. “NKR party does not participate in
negotiations and the conflict resolution is impossible without
it. Moreover, achievement of an agreement is possible only after the
societies will be ready, to a certain extent, to sign any document,
which is to be preceded by rather a long and intensive work”, Babayan
said.

However, he said, the Bucharest meeting has become turning, to some
degree. “Indirect evidence of this are the statements of several
high-ranking officials from mediator-countries. For example, the
statement of Leo Platvoet, the PACE reporter for missings, refugees
and population of Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan, during the meeting
with the RA Parliament speaker Tigran Torossyan.

Platvoet noted that he supposes in his report to offer the parties to
start cooperation at the level of organizations, dealing with this
problem. This is a very important statement in fact and means that the
necessity of participation of all three parties is finally
realized. It is a cooperation component towards strengthening of
measures of trust between the societies of the parties”, Babayan
said. The second important statement, according to Babayan, was made
by Daniel Fried, the USA deputy State Secretary for Europe and
Eurasia, who emphasized that “there is a desire to see return of much
more territories to Azerbaijan and return of Azerbaijanians to their
native places”.

Changing of borders between Karabakh and Azerbaijan without
alternatives is very important for security maintenance at the
international level. After all, any aggression must be punished not to
recur with more unpredictable consequences”, D. Babayan summed up.

ANCA Calls on Senators to Demand Explanation on Evans Firing

Armenian National Committee of America
1711 N Street NW
Washington, DC 20036
Tel: (202) 775-1918
Fax: (202) 775-5648
E-mail: [email protected]
Internet:

PRESS RELEASE
June 9, 2006
Contact: Elizabeth S. Chouldjian
Tel: (202) 775-1918

ANCA CALLS ON SENATORS TO DEMAND
FULL EXPLANATION OF EVANS FIRING

“The U.S. Senate cannot, in good conscience,
approve the nomination of a new ambassador to
Armenia until the circumstances of the current
envoy’s highly controversial firing are fully,
officially and openly explained to Congress and
the American people.

— ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian letter to U.S. Senators

WASHINGTON, DC – The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA)
today urged U.S. Senators to demand a full and open explanation of
the highly controversial firing of the current U.S. Ambassador to
Armenia, John Evans, before the Senate moves to confirm a new envoy
to Yerevan.

In June 9th letters, ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian encouraged
Senators to vigorously investigate the reasons behind the
Administration’s decision to recall the Ambassador more than a year
prior to the end of his normal term of office.

The Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the Fresno Bee have
reported that the State Department’s actions against Ambassador
Evans were due to his comments, made during February, 2005 speeches
to Armenian American audiences, accurately and openly describing
the Armenian Genocide as a clear instance of genocide. Despite
more than 60 Members of Congress having called for an official
explanation of the Administration’s policies and actions on this
matter, over the past four months the White House and State
Department have yet to offer any meaningful explanation about the
dismissal of this highly-regarded, 35-year veteran of the Foreign
Service.

Hachikian stressed, in his letters, that, “The U.S. Senate cannot,
in good conscience, approve the nomination of a new ambassador to
Armenia until the circumstances of the current envoy’s highly
controversial firing are fully, officially, and openly explained to
Congress and the American people. More broadly, the Administration
needs to honestly explain its policies and actions concerning the
Armenian Genocide. This is especially true given that serious
questions remain unanswered concerning the role that a foreign
nation – the Turkish Government – played in Ambassador Evans’
firing.”

The ANCA letter closed with Hachikian urging Senators to delay the
final approval of the incoming ambassador until the Administration
clearly and openly explains its policies and actions in connection
to the firing of Ambassador Evans.

Hachikian’s letters to the 18 members of the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee addressed their special oversight during the
panel’s upcoming confirmation hearing for the President’s nominees
to serve as the next Ambassador to Armenia.

A copy of the ANCA letter is provided below.

#####

June 9, 2006

Senator ______
U.S. Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator <<LAST>>:

I am writing, on behalf of the Armenian American community, to ask
you – in an exercise of your constitutional oversight
responsibility – to demand that the Administration explain its
reasons for firing the U.S. Ambassador to Armenia, John Marshall
Evans.

It is our understanding, based on information from within the State
Department, the U.S. Embassy in Armenia, the White House, and
published reports, that Ambassador Evans is being recalled over his
February 2005 statements at Armenian American community events
characterizing the Armenian Genocide as a clear case of genocide.
The Administration, however, despite months of Congressional
inquiries, has yet to offer any meaningful explanation of why this
highly-regarded diplomat is being dismissed nearly a year before
the end of his normal term of office.

The U.S. Senate cannot, in good conscience, approve the nomination
of a new ambassador to Armenia until the circumstances of the
current envoy’s highly controversial firing are fully, officially,
and openly explained to Congress and the American people. More
broadly, the Administration needs to honestly explain its policies
concerning the Armenian Genocide. This is especially true given
that serious questions remain unanswered concerning the role that
the Turkish Government played in Ambassador Evans’ firing.

I have attached two sets of suggested questions, one for the
Secretary of State and the other for the ambassador-designate
during his upcoming confirmation hearing. If, after this hearing,
these questions remain unanswered, I would respectfully suggest
that you use your prerogatives as a Senator to delay the Senate’s
confirmation until the Administration clearly explains its policies
and actions on this matter.

Sincerely yours,

Kenneth V. Hachikian
Chairman

www.anca.org

Arms Withdrawal From Georgia To Armenia Not Destabilising

ARMS WITHDRAWAL FROM GEORGIA TO ARMENIA NOT DESTABILISING

ITAR-TASS News Agency
May 31, 2006 Wednesday

The withdrawal of part of Russian armaments and military hardware
from Georgia to the Russian military base in Gyumri, Armenia, cannot
destabilise the military-political situation in the region, Russian
Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov said here on Wednesday.

“Part of military equipment and hardware is really being withdrawn from
Akhalkalaki to the Russian military base of Gyumri. This cannot bring
about the destabilisation of the military-political situation in the
region, especially in view of the fact that the withdrawal does not
violate flank restrictions within the framework of the Conventional
Force in Europe Treaty (CFE),” he said at a press conference after
the end of the meeting of the CIS Council of Defence Ministers in Baku.