Book Review: “Absurdistan”

“ABSURDISTAN”
by Tim McNulty, Special to The Seattle Times

The Seattle Times
May 14, 2006 Sunday
Fourth Edition

Players in the fields of oil;
The tale of an oligarch’s slacker son trapped in a fictional former
Soviet republic is a wicked satire of post-Cold War greed and ethnic
strife.

by Gary Shteyngart

Random House, 333 pp., $24.95

Russian emigre Gary Shteyngart burst upon the literary scene in
2002 with his rollicking and bitingly satirical debut novel, “The
Russian Debutante’s Handbook.” Its hero, like its author, was born
in Communist Leningrad, raised in Reagan ’80s America and flounders
about wildly in the turgid cultural gulf between them.

Misha Vainberg, the self-absorbed hero of Shteyngart’s hilarious
new novel, “Absurdistan,” is also a misplaced Russian. His comic
misadventures on two continents bring post-Soviet Russia and corporate
America into the crosshairs of the author’s outlandish wit.

“Absurdistan” is a brilliant, fast-paced and idiosyncratic novel
that swerves frighteningly close to dead-on political reporting. It
is black humor at its darkest.

Vainberg (aka “Snack Daddy” for his vast appetites) is the 325-pound,
melancholic son of a Russian mobster and oligarch (the 1,238th richest
man in Russia). Misha was educated at “Accidental College” in the
American Midwest but finds his true home in a Wall Street loft in
slacker Manhattan with his voluptuous South Bronx girlfriend, Rouenna.

There is no reason for Misha to return to St. Petersburg, with its
“bizarre peasant huts fashioned out of corrugated metal and plywood
colonizing the broad avenues.” But his “Beloved Papa” misses him,
so he goes. When Papa assassinates an Oklahoma businessman over a
percentage stake in a nutria farm, and then gets whacked himself
(for other, unrelated business dealings), Misha’s world constricts.

Denied a visa to re-enter the U.S., he is forced by circumstance to
travel to Absurdistan, a small, desperately poor but oil-rich fiefdom
wedged against the Caspian Sea. His singular mission there is to
purchase a phony European passport from a crooked Belgian consular
official (price: $240,000).

Life in Absurdistan takes an unfortunate turn for Misha shortly
after he checks in to his penthouse suite at the Hyatt. He finds
himself surrounded by Texas oilmen, Halliburton contractors and the
busy minions of Kellogg, Brown & Root. Svelte Absurdi hookers ply the
hallways, their faces “as powdered as an American doughnut.” The view
from his suite, however, is over rusted oil derricks and the brown,
alkaline shore that hems the capital city. A rock headland across the
bay is honeycombed with drab, concrete Soviet-era apartment complexes
that warehouse Absurdistan’s abundant poorer classes.

When civil war erupts between the ethnic Sevo and Svanï minorities (a
centuries-old religious dispute over the angle of Christ’s footrest
on the cross), Misha is trapped in the city. The inconvenience is
sufferable. He has a good supply of Atavan and the bar is kept stocked
with Johnnie Walker Black. American Express still rules, after all. But
when the governing elites hire Armenian mercenaries to begin shelling
the ethnic neighborhoods from the hotel roof, all hell breaks loose.

Misha is embraced by a garrulous warlord with former KGB ties and
appointed minister of multicultural affairs. Misha’s innocence
throughout all this is rather charming. Oblivious to the political
treachery swirling around him, his only goal is to return to his
darling Rouenna in New York.

It may seem unlikely, but Shteyngart is able to create endearing
characters who draw the reader in despite their shabby pursuits. He
also paints a vivid and brutal picture of the kind of strife that
rakes Third-World oil countries, and he spares no reproach for the
American interests that bleed them, supply the weaponry and profit
from reconstruction.

In fact, there is something disturbingly familiar about Absurdistan.

Shteyngart’s wacky vision of a post-Cold War world sinking beneath
the weight of the American Century is not far from the mark.

Tim McNulty’s most recent book of poetry, “Through High Still Air,”
was published last fall. He lives on the Olympic Peninsula.

Author appearance

Gary Shteyngart will read from “Absurdistan” at 7 p.m. Thursday
at Third Place Books in Lake Forest Park (206-366-3333; www.third
placebooks.com).

Salon.com May 1, 2006 Monday

“Absurdistan”

by Laura Miller

In his hilarious follow-up to “The Russian Debutante’s Handbook,”
Gary Shteyngart proves himself to be the post-Soviet era’s own
Joseph Heller.

Post-Soviet life may not need its own Joseph Heller — and chances are
it couldn’t sit still long enough to read his books even if it did —
but it has him all the same in Gary Shteyngart. Shteyngart’s first
novel, “The Russian Debutante’s Handbook,” described the adventures
of Vladimir Girshkin, a Russian Jew who was unhappily transplanted
to the U.S. in his childhood, as he seeks his fortune (and hides out
from mobsters) in the frantically Westernizing Eastern Europe of the
1990s. In Shteyngart’s latest, the hilarious, caustic “Absurdistan,”
another homesick Russian Jew, an obese innocent named Misha Vainberg,
pines for a lost paradise. In Misha’s case, Eden is the South Bronx,
where he once gorged on junk food and canoodled on the stoop with
his beloved Rouenna, a homegirl he hooked up with in a titty bar.

When we meet Misha, however, he’s stuck in St. Petersburg, penning
this book, ostensibly his “love letter to the generals in charge of
the Immigration and Naturalization Service.” He can’t get back into
the States because his father, the 1,238th richest man in Russia,
has shot and killed an Oklahoma businessman “over a 10 percent stake
in a nutria farm” and unlike the freewheeling Russians, the American
authorities don’t take kindly to the sons of murderers. Thanks to
Beloved Papa’s wealth — acquired through assorted dubious enterprises,
including VainBergAir, “an airline without any airplanes but with
plenty of stewardesses” — Misha lives pretty high on the hog. But
he longs for New York and Rouenna, especially when he learns that his
girlfriend has taken up with the detestable emigre Jerry Shteynfarb,
author of a crap novel called “The Russian Arriviste’s Hand Job.”

After Beloved Papa is assassinated by another kingpin, Misha’s
quest to get back to New York leads him on a circuitous, Ativan-
and whiskey-soaked journey to the obscure nation of Absurdistan,
a former Soviet satellite on the Caspian Sea. There he gets caught
up in the rising tensions between the Svani and Sevo, two Sneetchlike
local groups whose primary difference seems to be which way they think
“Christ’s footrest” should tilt on the Orthodox cross. Ensconced in
the Hyatt, where prostitutes roam the hallways, shrieking “Golly
Burton!” every time they think they’ve spotted an employee of a
certain well-connected American service-contracting firm, Misha
forlornly e-mails Rouenna. Eventually, after civil war breaks out in
Absurdistan, he takes up the Sevo cause, praying that for once he’s
on the side of right.

The plot of “Absurdistan,” however, is really just a pretext to
bedazzle the reader with a series of rowdy and blisteringly satirical
vignettes of life in contemporary Russia, the boondocks of Central
Asia and, every so often, the Never-Neverland of America itself.

Courtesy of Beloved Papa, Misha obtained a useless degree in
multicultural studies at “Accidental College,” a private (very)
liberal arts college in the Midwest, from which “a surprising number
of graduates went on to raise organic asparagus along the Oregonian
coast.” This education leaves our hero utterly unprepared for the new
Russia, where he listens to a hired thug (Ruslan the Enforcer) complain
that a rival (Ruslan the Punisher) has stolen the url for his nickname
“Why can’t my website be called … I am
the Enforcer. I know Ruslan the Punisher. He lives with his mother
by the Avtovo metro station. He is a nothing man. Now people will
think that I am him. They won’t hire me to do the bloody work. I
will be humiliated.” Not that Misha doesn’t have a certain kind of
expertise. He arouses an Absurdistani girlfriend, an NYU student on
break and equally enamored of the Big Apple, by reciting Zagat Guide
entries for Manhattan restaurants. To local leaders hoping that the
West will intervene in their conflict, he explains the grim truth:
“No one knows where your country is or who you are. You don’t have
a familiar ethnic cuisine; your diaspora, from what I understand,
is mostly in Southern California, three time zones removed from
the national media in New York; and you don’t have a recognizable,
long-simmering conflict like the one between the Israelis and the
Palestinians, where people in the richer nations can take sides and
argue over the dinner table. The best you can do is get the United
Nations involved, as in East Timor. Maybe they’ll send troops.”

The Sevo appoint Misha to the post of Minister of Multicultural Affairs
(even though they don’t know — or care — what “multicultural” means)
and he begins writing grant proposals to set up a Holocaust museum
in the capital (a bit of a stretch considering that the Nazis never
got as far east as Absurdistan, but the Absurdis think Misha can help
them win the favor of Israel and, thereby, the Americans). Somehow,
everyone Misha meets seems to know everything about him — that he
is a “melancholic and a sophisticate,” and that he slept with his
stepmother a few weeks after his father’s funeral — and finally he
will learn that everyone in Absurdistan knows something about the
civil war that he doesn’t.

In Absurdistan, almost everyone is working some kind of angle
or wearing some kind of disguise, mostly intended to manipulate
the prejudices and ignorance of romantic, patronizing, uniformed
Americans. The hotel manager, an Armenian-American born and raised
in Glendale, Calif., sends out notes in semi-literate English to the
guests, trying to pass himself off as “a wily local instead of some
middle-class brat from the San Fernando Valley.” A Mossad agent posing
as a Texan describes the extensive market research his agency has done
on “how genocides are perceived by the American electorate … We give
these American schmendricks a map of the world and say, ‘Point to the
general area where you think Congo is located.’ Nineteen percent point
to the continent of Africa. Another 23 percent point to either India,
or South America. We count those as correct answers, because Africa,
India, and South America all start out wide and then taper off at the
bottom. So, for our purposes, 42 percent of respondents sort of know
where Congo is.”

Savage, but pretty damn close to the truth. No doubt Shteyngart’s
portrait of life in Russia and “the ‘stans” is equally acute,
not matter how exaggerated it seems. Like Heller’s “Catch-22,”
“Absurdistan” has the feel of a book whose outrageous caricatures
will soon become shorthand for real-life situations. We’re all
Absurdistanis, or will be soon, and can sympathize with the beleaguered
manager of the Park Hyatt Svani City, when he asks, “Why did all this
history have to happen to me?”

–Boundary_(ID_biVGIT729zZoQshUFE614w)–

www.ruslan-the-enforcer.com?

New Britain Priest Goes To Court

NEW BRITAIN PRIEST GOES TO COURT

NBC30, MA
May 23 2006

NEW BRITAIN, Conn. — A New Britain priest accused of sexually
assaulting a young member of his parish is scheduled to face a judge
Tuesday.

Krikoris Keshishian, 53, is the leader of St. Stephen’s Armenian
Church.

He was arrested two weeks ago and charged with allegedly molesting
a 12-year-old girl.

Keshishian has not commented publicly on the case.

video at

http://www.nbc30.com/news/9259146/detail.html

Is It All Worth It? ‘Promotion Tours Hardly Contribute’

IS IT ALL WORTH IT? ‘PROMOTION TOURS HARDLY CONTRIBUTE’

esctoday.com, Netherlands
May 23 2006

2006 has been the year of the promotion tours. After Ruslana and
Helena Paparizou toured Europe and ended their Eurovision Song Contest
adventure with a victory, several of this year’s participants travelled
around Europe, trying to enlarge their potentials.

15 countries, 1 point

Fabrizio Faniello, Malta’s representative at this year’s Eurovision
Song Contest, is probably the most unfortunate example. Visiting
Ukraine, Germany, Romania, Belgium, the Netherlands, Croatia, Slovenia,
Andorra, Estonia, Finland, Sweden, Cyprus, Latvia, Bulgaria and Greece
was not enough to bring him more than the 1 point he received… from
Albania, the country he didn’t visit to promote I do.

All countries, 20th place in the semifinal Treble from the Netherlands
visited all 37 participating countries, after they promised the Dutch
audience to do so when they would win the national final. They came
20th in the semifinal of this year’s contest and thus didn’t qualify
for the final.

Good result Mihai Traistariu, who represented Romania with Tornero,
visited Greece, Slovenia, Malta, Belgium, Cyprus, France, Monaco,
Spain, Germany, Croatia, Bulgaria and Moldova to promote his entry. He
came 4th in the final, a respectable place. He received 12 points
from Spain and Moldova, 10 from Cyprus and Malta, which he all visited.

But Mihai also got 10 points from Israel and Portugal, countries he
didn’t visit to promote his song.

Armenian singer Andre hardly did any promotion at all in the countries
where he received his 10 and 12 points from. The band with singers
from six different countries, that represented Switzerland, could
only count on 12 points from Malta.

Kate Ryan Belgian representative Kate Ryan visited more than 10
countries to promote her Je t’adore. Not even half of her points
comes from the countries she visited.

No big tours The winners of this year’s Eurovision Song Contest, Lordi,
didn’t do any big promotion tours through Europe. Although visiting
some countries on his way to Athens, Dima Bilan didn’t cross Europe
either, nor did Bosnia & Herzegovina Hari Mata Hari.

Extensive promotion Although some participants with an extensive
promotion schedule did very well, others didn’t reach a high position
in the final or even failed to qualify for the final. Those who
did an extensive amount of promotion and reached a high position,
generally received points from all over Europe and not just from the
countries they visited.

Serge Sargsyan’s Brother Threatened A Journalist

SERGE SARGSYAN’S BROTHER THREATENED A JOURNALIST

A1+
[03:22 pm] 23 May, 2006

Today NA deputy, member of the Armenian Republican party and Serge
Sargsyan’s brother Alexander Sargsyan mouthed indecent curses at Taguhy
Tovmasyan, correspondent of “Iravunk” and then threatened her by saying
“the end won’t be a good one.”

Taguhy Tovmasyan only informed in the newspaper that Sashik Sargsyan
participated at the birthday party of one of their district authorities
in the restaurant “Shant” on May 3. During the party some of the
drunken authorities remembered that they had certain problems with
Sashik Sargsyan, to say more precisely, the latter was involved in
a story connected with large sums of money, so the above mentioned
authorities decided to settle their affairs with Sargsyan in the yard
of the restaurant.

Today in the Parliament Alexander Sargsyan was eager to find out who
gave Taguhy Tovmasyan the information.

The latter answered that in case the information doesn’t correspond to
the reality Sashik Sargsyan may bring an action or demand refute. “Do
you know who I am?” declared Sargsyan. Ashot Aghababyan, member of the
Republican Party was also present during the incident and he tried to
calm down the “deputy,” whereas the latter continued his curses about
the journalist in the presence of many people. “If you don’t reveal
the source of the information, you will have many problems. You know
who I am, don’t you?” threatened Sargsyan in the end.

Hrant Khacatryan, NA deputy was also involved in the incident who
claimed, “If you have any problems turn to us, you know both us and
the newspaper. What do you want from journalists?”

Historiens, Causez Toujours!

HISTORIENS, CAUSEZ TOUJOURS!
Alain-Gerard Slama

Le Figaro, France
22 mai 2006

L’interruption a l’Assemblee, jeudi dernier, de la discussion de la
proposition socialiste de penaliser la negation du genocide perpetre
contre les Armeniens par les Turcs en 1915, n’est pas scandaleuse en
raison de l’astuce de procedure qui l’a provoquee.

Le scandale reside dans le fait que, pour justifier le report de la
discussion, l’argument des menaces de retorsion commerciale avancees
par la diplomatie turque l’ait emporte de très loin sur le debat
contre les lois ” memorielles ” lance par des historiens de droite et
de gauche au debut de cette annee. Historiens, causez toujours ! Sans
doute les intellectuels se sont-ils beaucoup trompes au XX e siècle,
mais par ideologie. Or s’il est un appel qui n’etait pas ideologique,
c’etait bien celui-la.

La question n’est pas en effet de savoir si le massacre de masse
perpetre par les nationalistes turcs en 1915 etait ou non un
genocide. C’en fut un, de facon indiscutable, au sens retenu par
la resolution de l’ONU du 9 decembre 1948, qui designait de ce mot
” l’intention de detruire, en tout ou partie, un groupe national,
ethnique racial ou religieux en tant que tel “. S’agissant d’un meurtre
collectif, dont Toynbee d’emblee, et Yves Ternon plus près de nous ont
demontre le caractère premedite, ethnique et massif, le seul fait de
discuter l’emploi du terme, sous pretexte que d’autres seraient plus
appropries, ne peut etre exempt de prejuges et d’arrière-pensees.

Il est vrai que ce massacre etait lie a une situation de guerre, et
qu’il venait au terme d’une longue serie de ” populicides ” multiplies
en meme temps que les nationalismes dans les Balkans. Vrai encore
que l’exceptionnalite du genocide des juifs, visant un peuple sans
autre grief que le crime d’etre ne, ” independamment, ecrit Francois
Furet, de toutes considerations intelligibles tirees des luttes pour le
pouvoir ” met en jeu un racisme a l’etat pur, toujours pret a renaître,
et qui ne doit pas etre banalise.

Il n’en reste pas moins que le genocide des Armeniens a repose, lui
aussi, sur une base raciale et qu’il s’est inscrit, comme le souligne
Jacques Semmelin, dans un ” processus ” qui rend la querelle sur les
preuves de sa programmation relativement secondaire (1).

Non, la vraie question, posee par les historiens, est de savoir
si la loi peut intervenir pour trancher de questions où la liberte
de chercher et d’expliquer est d’autant plus necessaire que cette
connaissance a un impact plus passionnel. L’obstination du regime
turc a nier la realite du genocide sera mieux vaincue par le travail
des historiens, y compris turcs, que par une loi d’un pays etranger
imposant une verite officielle sous la contrainte de la prison et
de l’amende.

A cette question s’en ajoute une autre, non moins fondamentale,
qui est la menace que les lois qui multiplient les reconnaissances
de droits subjectifs font peser sur les libertes publiques dans leur
ensemble. Peut-etre l’appel des historiens demandant l’abrogation de
toutes les lois memorielles aurait-il ete mieux entendu s’il avait
aborde la question sous cet angle.

Demander l’abrogation de l’ensemble de ces lois, incluant la loi
Gayssot de 1992, la loi de 2001 reconnaissant le genocide armenien, la
loi Taubira de 2002 sur l’esclavage, declare crime contre l’humanite,
et la loi de fevrier 2005 sur le ” rôle positif ” de la presence
coloniale francaise en Afrique du Nord, revenait a la fois a viser
trop haut et trop etroit.

Trop haut, parce que l’abrogation de ces textes aurait eu un impact
politique encore pire que le fait de les avoir votes. Mieux aurait
valu sans doute, comme on l’a plaide ici, negocier le retrait de
l’article 4 de la loi de fevrier 2002 contre l’article 2 de la loi
Taubira qui l’avait inspire : en depassant le clivage droite-gauche sur
un point sans ambiguïte, le refus d’edicter une histoire officielle,
ce compromis, si peu satisfaisant qu’il soit, aurait cree un precedent
opposable.

Trop etroit, parce que, en se limitant aux bornes imposees a leur
metier d’historien, les signataires de l’appel encouraient le reproche
de corporatisme, ce qui n’a pas manque. A travers les lois visees par
les historiens, il aurait fallu mieux marquer que c’est la fonction
meme de la loi et du rôle de la sanction en democratie qui se trouvent
menaces.

La loi ne saurait etre edictee pour donner satisfaction a des groupes
particuliers. Une societe qui cède a ces pressions se detruit elle-meme
en favorisant une surenchère de revendications et de frustrations
entre des communautes dont la competition est d’autant plus nuisible
a l’unite nationale qu’elles ont des referents a l’etranger.

Quant au rôle de la sanction, il ne saurait etre de contraindre les
citoyens a faire la preuve de leur vertu. La loi n’a pas a brider la
liberte de penser, d’ecrire et de parler, elle n’a pas a normaliser
les comportements, mais a sanctionner le dommage cause a autrui,
quand celui-ci fait l’objet d’une plainte. Un code juridique, dans
une nation libre, n’est pas un traite de morale. Le drame est que
notre societe se rue sur cette pente avec une hargne de precaution
entretenue par sa peur du risque et du conflit.

(1) Jacques Semelin, Purifier et Detruire, Seuil, 2005.

–Boundary_(ID_1+OY2QgtKmmrmEyjk/N99w)–

Chief Of Ukrainian Armed Forces General Staff Arriving In Yerevan Ma

CHIEF OF UKRAINIAN ARMED FORCES GENERAL STAFF ARRIVING IN YEREVAN MAY 24

PanARMENIAN.Net
22.05.2006 17:38 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces General Staff,
Colonel General Sergey Kirichenko is arriving in Yerevan on a 2-day
visit May 24. As RA Defense Minister’s Spokesman, Colonel Seyran
Shahsuvaryan told PanARMENIAN.Net, Kirichenko is scheduled to meet
with the Chief of the RA Armed Forces General Staff, Deputy Defense
Minister, Colonel General Mikael Harutyunyan and National Assembly
Vice-speaker Tigran Torosyan.

He will also attend the memorial to the Armenian Genocide victims, the
mine clearing center and the Military Institute after V. Sargsyan. The
Ukrainian delegation will also meet with Catholicos of All Armenians
Garegin II.

A number of agreements will be signed between the Armenian and
Ukrainian Armed Forces upon the outcomes of the visit.

Fellowship of Oriental Orthodox Spiritual Leaders Issue Joint PR

PRESS RELEASE
Western Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church of America
H.E. Archbishop Moushegh Mardirossian, Prelate
6252 Honolulu Avenue
La Crescenta, CA 91214
Tel: (818) 248-7737
Fax: (818) 248-7745
E-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Website: <;

FELLOWSH IP OF ORIENTAL ORTHODOX SPIRITUAL LEADERS ISSUE JOINT COMMUNIQUE

On Tuesday, May 16, 2006, the spiritual leaders of the Oriental Orthodox
Churches met to discuss various issues of concern. Included in the
discussion were the `Da Vinci Code’ and the `Gospel of Judas’.
The fellowship was hosted by H.G. Bishop Joseph Al-Zehlaoui of
the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese, and with the participation of
H.E. Archbishop Moushegh Mardirossian, Prelate, H.E. Archbishop Hovnan
Derderian, Primate, H.G. Bishop Serapion of the Coptic Orthodox Church, and
H.E. Archbishop Mor Clemis Eugene Kaplan of the Syriac Orthodox Church.
Also in attendance were Fr. Michael Najim of St. Nicholas Cathedral and Fr.
Abdallah Zaidan of Our Lady of Mt. Lebanon Cathedral.
At the conclusion of the fellowship, it was decided that a joint
communique be issued to the faithful regarding the `Da Vinci Code’ and the
`Gospel of Judas’. The following is the text of the communique.

`We, as Orthodox Bishops caution our faithful about the movie `Da Vinci
Code’, which falsifies the reality of our Lord Jesus Christ. Based on
fiction and falsehood, this movie tries to discredit the fundamentals of our
Christian Orthodox faith and attack the authenticity of the New Testament.
Also, we caution our faithful about the `Gospel of Judas’. This
`gospel’, better entitled the Judas Document is neither `good news’ (the
meaning of `gospel’) nor was it written by Judas Iscariot, nor is it even
particularly `new’. This ancient manuscript was roundly condemned and
refuted by the early Church Fathers.
In the midst of the media’s relentless avalanche of
anti-Christian propaganda concerning our Lord Jesus Christ, we are confident
that you are standing firm in your Orthodox faith. Battling for our
Apostolic Faith, which bears the Truth of who Jesus Christ is, we must
remain undismayed by attacks that the media launches against the accuracy
and veracity of the four Gospels.’

http://www.westernprelacy.org/&gt
www.westernprelacy.org

Robert Fisk: You’re talking nonsense, Mr. Ambassador

Robert Fisk: You’re talking nonsense, Mr Ambassador

All the while, new diplomatic archives are opening to reveal the
smell of death – Armenian death

The Independent
Published: 20 May 2006

A letter from the Turkish Ambassador to the Court of Saint James
arrived for me a few days ago, one of those missives that send a
shudder through the human soul. “You allege that an ‘Armenian
genocide’ took place in Eastern Anatolia in 1915,” His Excellency Mr
Akin Alptuna told me. “I believe you have some misconceptions about
those events …”

Oh indeedy doody, I have. I am under the totally mistaken conception
that one and a half million Armenians were cruelly and deliberately
done to death by their Turkish Ottoman masters in 1915, that the men
were shot and knifed while their womenfolk were raped and eviscerated
and cremated and starved on death marches and their children
butchered. I have met a few of the survivors – liars to a man and
woman, if the Turkish ambassador to Britain is to be believed – and I
have seen the photographs taken of the victims by a brave German
photographer called Armen Wegner whose pictures must now, I suppose,
be consigned to the waste bins. So must the archives of all those
diplomats who courageously catalogued the mass murders inflicted upon
Turkey’s Christian population on the orders of the gang of
nationalists who ran the Ottoman government in 1915.

What would have been our reaction if the ambassador of Germany had
written a note to the same effect? “You allege that a ‘Jewish
genocide’ took place in Eastern Europe between 1939 and 1945 … I
believe you have some misconceptions about those events …’ Of
course, the moment such a letter became public, the ambassador of
Germany would be condemned by the Foreign Office, our man in Berlin
would – even the pusillanimous Blair might rise to the occasion – be
withdrawn for consultations and the European Union would debate
whether sanctions should be placed upon Germany.

But Mr Alptuna need have no such worries. His country is not a member
of the European Union – it merely wishes to be – and it was Mr
Blair’s craven administration that for many months tried to prevent
Armenian participation in Britain’s Holocaust Day.

Amid this chicanery, there are a few shining bright lights and I
should say at once that Mr Alptuna’s letter is a grotesque
representation of the views of a growing number of Turkish citizens,
a few of whom I have the honour to know, who are convinced that the
story of the great evil visited upon the Armenians must be told in
their country. So why, oh why, I ask myself, are Mr Alptuna and his
colleagues in Paris and Beirut and other cities still peddling this
nonsense?

In Lebanon, for example, the Turkish embassy has sent a “communiqué”
to the local French-language L’Orient Le Jour newspaper, referring to
the “soi-disant (so-called) Armenian genocide” and asking why the
modern state of Armenia will not respond to the Turkish call for a
joint historical study to “examine the events” of 1915.

In fact, the Armenian president, Robert Kotcharian, will not respond
to such an invitation for the same reason that the world’s Jewish
community would not respond to the call for a similar examination of
the Jewish Holocaust from the Iranian president – because an
unprecedented international crime was committed, the mere questioning
of which would be an insult to the millions of victims who perished.

But the Turkish appeals are artfully concocted. In Beirut, they
recall the Allied catastrophe at Gallipoli in 1915 when British,
French, Australian and New Zealand troops suffered massive casualties
at the hands of the Turkish army. In all – including Turkish soldiers
– up to a quarter of a million men perished in the Dardanelles. The
Turkish embassy in Beirut rightly states that the belligerent nations
of Gallipoli have transformed these hostilities into gestures of
reconciliation, friendship and mutual respect. A good try. But the
bloodbath of Gallipoli did not involve the planned murder of hundreds
of thousands of British, French, Australian, New Zealand – and
Turkish – women and children.

But now for the bright lights. A group of “righteous Turks” are
challenging their government’s dishonest account of the 1915
genocide: Ahmet Insel, Baskin Oran, Halil Berktay, Hrant Dink, Ragip
Zarakolu and others claim that the “democratic process” in Turkey
will “chip away at the darkness” and they seek help from Armenians in
doing so. Yet even they will refer only to the 1915 “disaster”, the
“tragedy”, and the “agony” of the Armenians. Dr Fatma Gocek of the
University of Michigan is among the bravest of those Turkish-born
academics who are fighting to confront the Ottoman Empire’s terror
against the Armenians. Yet she, too, objects to the use of the word
genocide – though she acknowledges its accuracy – on the grounds that
it has become “politicised” and thus hinders research.

I have some sympathy with this argument. Why make the job of honest
Turks more difficult when these good men and women are taking on the
might of Turkish nationalism? The problem is that other, more
disreputable folk are demanding the same deletion. Mr Alputuna writes
to me – with awesome disingenuousness – that Armenians “have failed
to submit any irrefutable evidence to support their allegations of
genocide”. And he goes on to say that “genocide, as you are well
aware, has a quite specific legal definition” in the UN’s 1948
Convention. But Mr Alputuna is himself well aware – though he does
not say so, of course – that the definition of genocide was set out
by Raphael Lemkin, a Jew, in specific reference to the wholesale mass
slaughter of the Armenians.

And all the while, new diplomatic archives are opening in the West
which reveal the smell of death – Armenian death – in their pages. I
quote here, for example, from the newly discovered account of
Denmark’s minister in Turkey during the First World War. “The Turks
are vigorously carrying through their cruel intention, to exterminate
the Armenian people,” Carl Wandel wrote on 3 July 1915. The Bishop of
Harput was ordered to leave for Aleppo within 48 hours “and it has later
been learned that this Bishop and all the clergy that accompanied him
have been … killed between Diyarbekir and Urfa at a place where
approximately 1,700 Armenian families have suffered the same fate …
In Angora … approximately 6,000 men … have been shot on the
road … even here in Constantinople (Istanbul), Armenians are being
abducted and sent to Asia …”

There is much, much more. Yet now here is Mr Alptuna in his letter to
me: “In fact, the Armenians living outside Eastern Armenia including
Istanbul … were excluded from deportation.” Somebody here is not
telling the truth. The late Mr Wandel of Copenhagen? Or the Turkish
Ambassador to the Court of St James?

Viewpoint: All kinds of puppets on a Euro string

Belfast Telegraph, United Kingdom
May 20 2006

Viewpoint: All kinds of puppets on a Euro string

20 May 2006
On one night of the year the European dream comes true, when all its
countries join in the fun of Eurovision – and tonight’s the night.
Will Armenia (surely in Asia?) break its duck or could Ireland recall
the glory days of Dana and Johnny Logan with an Athenian victory for
Falls Road man, Brian Kennedy?

In millions of homes across the continent and beyond, bottles will be
opened and score sheets prepared, as families gather to cheer, jeer
and cringe as the multi-national extravaganza unfolds. Ridiculous
costumes, silly dance routines and excruciating lyrics – they’re all
part of the crazy, kitschy world of the Eurovision song contest.

Just occasionally – about half a dozen times in 51 years – a song
breaks through the lycra curtain and registers with the public as
something more than Eurofodder. Sandy Shaw’s “Puppet on a String” in
1967, written by our own Phil Coulter, was one of those, closely
followed in 1970 by Dana’s “All Kinds of Everything”, such a contrast
with today’s frenetic offerings, and, everyone’s favourite,
“Waterloo”, the song that launched Abba 32 years ago.

All 24 finalists tonight are guaranteed their biggest-ever audience,
most of them then returning to the oblivion they so richly deserve,
but for the winner there is nothing short of Olympian glory. Their
career receives a massive boost, their place in national history is
assured and they can look forward to years of interviews beginning:
“Whatever happened to you after Eurovision?”

In the early years, the major nations and their musicians took it
deadly seriously, but a certain Irishman has helped to change all
that. For Terry Wogan, the perennial BBC commentator, it is an
opportunity to gently mock the antics of the more desperate
performers, and nowadays the British and Irish like to scorn as they
watch – perhaps because they seldom win.

After the songs and the tourism clips from the host country, comes
the lottery of the voting procedure, made even more unpredictable
this year by the inclusion of no less than 38 countries. The war in
Iraq has put paid to the UK’s popularity, in recent years, and
Ireland’s best hope may be that immigrants from eastern Europe, whose
countries traditionally vote for each other, will register their
thanks to the Celtic tiger.

Nostalgia lovers will regret that the days of “nul points” have been
consigned to the past, in the new voting method. Points from 1 to 7
will only be shown on the TV scoreboard and it will be left to the
national presenters to stumble over the awards of 8, 10 and 12 points
until, excitingly, the last three countries give their scores in
full. You couldn’t make it up.

Film Review: Vodka Lemon Tastes Like Almonds

FILM REVIEW: VODKA LEMON TASTES LIKE ALMONDS
5/19/2006 Seattlest.com – By Michael van Baker

Kurdish Media, UK
May 19 2006

Vodka Lemon by Hiner Saleem

Vodka Lemon opened its run at Central Cinema last night and Seattlest
was there because, after a forceful interior discussion, we couldn’t
recall ever having seen an Armenian film. Certainly not lately. Vodka
Lemon was shown in Seattle for the 2004 SIFF, but since we usually
stall out by the third page of the catalog, this was news to us.

mini-vodka_lemon01.jpgIn other news, before we get to the movie,
Central Cinema has a new spring menu. It’s a seasonal update; they’re
still all about those pizzas and beer. On rotating tap (picture a
possessed faucet twirling for just a second) is a summery Belgian
beer which we could have just kicked ourselves for forgetting to try.

Now the little thumbnail review: Vodka Lemon is set in an area of
Armenia that will profit greatly from the effects of global warming.

The scenery is stark, snowy, and frozen; people’s faces are chapped
and reddened by windburn; and we learn that Armenians (in this film
at least) sit around on chairs in the elements to discuss the affairs
of the day.

Director Hiner Saleem, an exiled Iraqi Kurd, places a budding romance
between two widowers in front of the evidence of wrenching decay.

(With the fall of the the USSR, Armenia was unhooked from its economic
life-support machine.) Saleem offers us allegory, but he remembers
to ground it in scenes from a rocky life.

Grizzled old Hamo has to survive on a pension of less than $10/month,
beg his sons (who have left Armenia to find work) for extra cash,
and slowly sell his most treasured possessions to cover his bus
trips to the cemetery to update his dead wife with the news that
“things are fine.” The whole village is hard up, but somehow the
movie skirts being grim — Hamo’s not-exactly-surefooted courtship
of a younger widow not only lightens the mood, it embiggens the soul.

Vodka Lemon plays a minor but essential part. Someone complains
that it tastes like almonds, not lemon. “That’s Armenia!” is the
laconic response. The movie plays through Sunday. If you go see
just one Armenian film directed by an Iraqi Kurd this year, you’d be
hard-pressed to beat this one. Let us know about the Belgian beer.