BAKU: Azerbaijani MP Wishes To Visit Armenia

AZERBAIJANI MP WISHES TO VISIT ARMENIA

TREND Information
Oct 9 2007
Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan, Baku / Trend corr I. Alizadeh / Azerbaijani MP wants to
visit Armenia. Popular writer, MP Akram Eylisli, said in Baku on 9
October that he was positively regarding the visit of Azerbaijan’s
art men to Armenia. "I will not refuse if I am included into the art
delegation to visit Armenia," he said.

After a 17-year intermission representative of Azerbaijani and Armenian
art people jointly visited Nagorno-Karabakh, Yerevan and Baku. It is
reported that the second visit will be paid in neat future.

Eylisli stressed one day or another Azerbaijan and Armenia will
reconcile. "The Armenian and Azerbaijani people have to neighbour.

Once the two countries had friendly relations and friendship should
not be lost," he said.

According to the MO, Nagorno-Karabakh conflict should be settled
through compromise and war will not bring a good result.

Reuters: Turkey May Cut Support To U.S. Over Armenia Bill-MP

TURKEY MAY CUT SUPPORT TO U.S. OVER ARMENIA BILL-MP

Reuters
Oct 8 2007

ANKARA – Turkey may cut logistic support to U.S. troops in Iraq if
the U.S. Congress backs a bill branding as genocide the 1915 massacres
of Armenians by Ottoman Turks, a senior ruling AK Party lawmaker was
quoted as saying on Monday.

Congress’s Foreign Affairs Committee is expected to approve on
Wednesday a bill on the genocide issue and speaker Nancy Pelosi,
a known supporter of the Armenian cause, could then decide to bring
it to the House floor for a vote.

Turkey, a NATO ally of Washington, strongly denies Armenian claims,
backed by many Western historians and a number of foreign parliaments,
that up to 1.5 million ethnic Armenians suffered genocide at Turkish
hands during World War One.

It says many Muslim Turks as well as Christian Armenians died in
inter-ethnic conflict as the Ottoman Empire collapsed.

‘Don’t accept this bill. If you do, we will be obliged to do many
things we do not want to do,’ the top-selling Hurriyet daily quoted
AK Party deputy leader Egemen Bagis as saying.

‘For example, the Americans depend on Turkey for a large part of
their logistical support in Iraq. We would be obliged to to cut this
support,’ he was quoted as saying.

Bagis was speaking in a personal capacity, but Turkey’s government
has many times urged foreign countries, including the United States,
not to pass such resolutions, saying historians, not politicians,
should judge historic events.

Last year, Turkey froze military and some commercial cooperation
with France after the French National Assembly backed a bill that
would make it a crime to deny the Armenian genocide, although the
bill never became law.

U.S. forces in both Iraq and Afghanistan get many of their supplies
via the Incirlik military base in southern Turkey.

Contacted by Reuters, Bagis declined to say what specific measures
Turkey might take but said: ‘This bill might please Armenian Americans
for a few days but it would definitely have a long-lasting negative
effect on the relationship between two strategic allies.’

Bagis noted in his comments to Hurriyet that Turkish public opinion has
already turned very anti-American due to the Iraq war and Washington’s
failure to crack down on Kurdish rebels who use northern Iraq as a
base from which to attack Turkey.

‘If the bill passes, pressure from public opinion (to take action
against U.S. interests) will be very strong,’ he said.

Bagis left for Washington with two other Turkish lawmakers on Monday
to lobby Congress to drop the bill.

Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan raised Turkey’s concerns with
U.S. President George W. Bush in a telephone conversation last
Friday. The Bush administration is opposed to the bill but Congress
is now dominated by its Democratic.

BAKU: Green Party Considers NK Conflict to be Citizen-Power Struggle

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
Oct 5 2007

Azerbaijani Green Party Considers Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict to be
Citizen-Power Struggle

Azerbaijan, Baku / Trend corr. S. Ilhamgizi / The Green Party of
Azerbaijan considers the Azerbaijani-Armenia conflict over
Nagorno-Karabakh to be a citizen-power struggle, Mais Guliyev, the
Chairman of the Party, said.

The main essence of the US foreign policy is to split countries by
pitting the opposition against the Authorities, Guliyev said.

`The US always supports national and ethnic group conflicts in order
to split the countries and achieve control over them,’ the Chairman
said.

Joining Azerbaijan to NATO will freeze the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict,
the Chairman considers.

Some participants of the meeting did not agree with the party’s
position. Razi Nurullayev, an independent political scientist, said
the US position concerning the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict does not
differ from positions of other countries. The US recognizes the
territorial integrity of Azerbaijan. Nurullayev believes the US’
demands to to liberate the Azerbaijani territories from Armenia to be
impossible.

The conflict between the two countries of the South Caucasus began in
1988 due to Armenian territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Since
1992, Armenian Armed Forces have occupied 20% of Azerbaijan including
the Nagorno-Karabakh region and its seven surrounding districts. In
1994, Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement at which
time the active hostilities ended. The Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk
Group ( Russia, France, and the US) are currently holding peaceful
negotiations.

Republican Contest Of Duduk-Players To Be Held In Yerevan Within Fra

REPUBLICAN CONTEST OF DUDUK-PLAYERS TO BE HELD IN YEREVAN WITHIN FRAMEWORKS OF UNESCO
Author: Hakobian Hasmik

Noyan Tapan News Agency, Armenia
Oct 4 2007

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 4, NOYAN TAPAN. The music of the Armenian duduk was
proclaimed to be one of the oral non-material cultural masterpieces
of the humanity by the UNESCO in 2005, and the National Commission of
Armenia for UNESCO committed itself to implement a number of programs
during five years directed at the propaganda of duduk.

According to the information provided to a Noyan Tapan correspondent by
duduk-player Gevorg Dabaghian, a republican contest of duduk-players
will be organized in the Armenian Choral Society on October 6, within
the frameworks of the program, and more than forty duduk-players
aged 14-35 will take part in this contest. The contest will have two
stages. Cash prizes are determined for the first, second and third
places, an encouraging prize has also been determined.

The personnel of the jury consists of Davit Ghazarian, the Head of the
Choral Society, Arzas Oskanian and Alina Pahlevanian, professors of the
Yerevan State Conservatory after Komitas, tar-player Norayr Davtian,
RA honorable artist Georgi Minasov, and composer Jirayr Altunian.

Gevorg Dabaghian also declared that a "Duduk manual" has already
been published for the purpose of propagadizing the duduk, in which
the analytical articles of famous artists are presented, which once
again prove that the duduk is an Armenian instrument and that Armenia
is its homeland.

Duduk courses of high qualification have been held in all the regions
of the republic for the past two years. "My goal is to do everything
so as the duduk that is widely spread throughout the world keeps to
its pure and natural state. We try to represent our national musical
instrument in the right way through the courses conducted in the
regions of the republic," Gevorg Dabaghian mentioned. The duduk-player
also stated that a great number of children study in the department of
the duduk in schools of music, in difference to other folk instruments.

BAKU: Azerbaijani FM Elmar Mammadyarov And Under Secretary Of State

AZERBAIJANI FM ELMAR MAMMADYAROV AND UNDER SECRETARY OF STATE NICHOLAS BURNS DISCUSS PROBLEM OF IRAN

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Oct 4 2007

Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov has met with U.S
Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns in
UN headquarters in the framework of his working visit to New York,
APA reports quoting AzerTaj State Agency.

Closed meeting lasted half an hour. OSCE Minsk Group co-chair Matthew
Bryza also participated in the meeting.

Nicholas Burns stressed necessity of touching on achieving progress
in Nagorno Karabakh conflict in the debates.

"I met with Armenian Foreign Minister not long ago. We will continue
these debates and we hope that we will give impetus on achieving
progress in the settlement of Nagorno Karabakh conflict. We exchanged
views on energy issue later on. Americans regard Azerbaijan one of
the main regions of the world as a transit country. We will do our
best for Azerbaijan for achieving success in this sector. Azerbaijan
has rare geographical position in uniting Central Asia and Caucasus
to Europe. Project envisaging transportation of Azerbaijani gas to
Europe is of great importance. US government is against the domination
of one country in gas insurance of Europe, we want to see variety
in this field. We are planning to carry out high-level debates with
Azerbaijani government regarding these issues," he said.

Nicholas Burns stated that he touched on problem of Iran in his
meeting with Elmar Mammadyarov.

"We also spoke about Iran in the meeting. I informed the minister
that US will continue to support sanctions against Iran in UN Security
Council. We are against Iranian government’s efforts in armament and
financing "HAMAS", "Hizbullah" and so on," he said.

Armenia: Former President Lashes Out At Incumbent Administration

ARMENIA: FORMER PRESIDENT LASHES OUT AT INCUMBENT ADMINISTRATION
Marianna Grigoryan

EurasiaNet, NY
Oct 2 2007

A speech by former Armenian President Levon Ter-Petrossian, coupled
with speculation about his possible candidacy in the 2008 presidential
elections, has roiled Armenia’s political waters.

On September 21, the 16th anniversary of Armenia’s independence,
Ter-Petrossian broke nearly a decade of public silence to give a
harsh assessment of President Robert Kocharian’s administration. The
former Armenian leader, who oversaw the country’s difficult transition
immediately following the 1991 Soviet collapse, said Armenia is run by
"a corrupt, criminal regime, whose relations are governed not by laws,
not by the will of the people, not by political dialogue, but by the
rules of the underworld."

Members of the ruling Republican Party of Armenia, as well as
Kocharian, denounced Ter-Petrossian’s speech, with the president
implying that it would be better for the 62-year-old former chief
executive to maintain a dignified silence in retirement. The speech
was delivered during an independence celebration organized by
Ter-Petrossian’s Armenian National Movement Party.

Although most major opposition parties have welcomed Ter-Petrossian’s
comments for potentially "bringing possible qualitative changes"
to Armenian politics, no clear idea exists as to his next step.

Ter-Petrossian himself has said that he is still "studying" the
situation, adding that his choices "cannot be guided by emotions."

Many analysts, however, think he could emerge as the main rival to
incumbent Prime Minister Serzh Sarkisian in next year’s presidential
election. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive]. When he
resigned the presidency in 1998, Ter-Petrossian stated that he would
return to national politics if "the people asked him."

"The first president enjoys great prestige and has many years’
experience. By entering politics, he will make the [2008 presidential]
election contest hotter," commented political analyst Stepan Safarian,
a member of the opposition Heritage Party.

After years of refraining from making any public statement or attending
any public event, Ter-Petrossian’s political comeback first became
a topic of discussion this summer, after a series of visits by the
ex-president to Armenian regions. "The public has experienced a deep
disillusionment with almost all opposition leaders especially after
the latest parliamentary elections," said Union of Political Analysts
Chairman Dr. Hmayak Hovhannisian. "[A]gainst this backdrop, the first
president’s return was well-calculated. . . [it] is an expected event
and promises a big success."

Not surprisingly given his past, the issue of Nagorno-Karabakh is
surfacing as a lightening rod for the Ter-Petrossian camp. On the
former president’s watch, Armenia gained control of the disputed
territory after a six-year conflict with Azerbaijan. Ter-Petrossian’s
resignation was linked closely to a call that he made in 1998 for
Armenia to make concessions to Azerbaijan in order to secure a Karabakh
peace settlement. In his September 21 speech, Ter-Petrossian termed the
ongoing lack of a settlement with Azerbaijan "the greatest offense"
of the Kocharian administration. [For background see the Eurasia
Insight archive].

"If you follow Azerbaijan’s reactions, then you will see that their
position is growing tougher. From now on, they will not agree to
any compromise," he said. "I don’t know what it is possible to do
to get out of this situation. But I repeat, I don’t consider this
situation hopeless yet. It is possible to try to get back to [being]
normal countries."

According to some analysts, the dismal outlook for negotiations with
Azerbaijan means that options for resolving the question of Karabakh’s
status will feature prominently in the upcoming presidential election.

"If you remember, during the previous presidential elections Kocharian
was forgiven for vote rigging, since, at that time, he promised to
solve the Karabakh problem," said Safarian, who describes the issue
as "a focal point" for next year’s campaign. A bill introduced
to parliament by the Heritage Party that would have recognized
Nagorno-Karabakh as an independent country failed in late August,
however.

Aside from compromise on Karabakh, Ter-Petrossian has also called for
an overhaul of the judicial system and of law-enforcement agencies
in an effort to curb politically motivated prosecutions and rampant
corruption.

Members of the governing Republican Party, however, take a dim view
of the former president’s comments. A recent news program broadcast
by pro-government Armenian Public Television derided Ter-Petrossian’s
criticism and showed archival footage of the "cold and dark years"
of the mid-1990s under his administration.

Kocharian himself has not given any public sign that Ter-Petrossian’s
verbal attack created cause for reflection.

In a September 25 media briefing on Armenia’s IT sector, Kocharian,
who served as prime minister under Ter-Petrossian before replacing
him as president, noted that if he decides to re-enter politics,
the former Armenian leader will turn into an "ordinary opposition
figure with all the ensuing consequences."

"[W]e will have to remind [Armenians] of many things …" he added.

Pointing to the country’s high economic growth rates, Kocharian also
took issue with Ter-Petrossian’s statement. "The most effective reforms
are being carried out in Armenia, and if these assessments were true,
we would never have had such achievements," the incumbent said.

While welcoming Ter-Petrossian as a potential counter-weight to
Prime Minister Sarkisian, the opposition is divided over the former
president’s chances for success in the 2008 polls.

"Levon Ter-Petrossian has no prospect, but it is my big wish to see
him nominated, so that the people and not he himself will put an end
once and for all to his power, ambitions and alleged popularity,"
National Democratic Party Chairman Shavarsh Kocharian told EurasiaNet.

Aram Sarkisian, the Hanrapetutiun (Republic) Party leader, predicted
victory if Ter-Petrossian decides to campaign. "The first president
is a political figure who weighs a decision a hundred times and makes
it only once… if Ter-Petrossian makes a decision to participate in
the election campaign, it will mean that he will win by all means.

Otherwise, he will not make that decision," Sarkisian said.

Editor’s Note: Marianna Grigoryan is a reporter for the online
independent ArmeniaNow weekly in Yerevan.

Israel Will Not Halt Security Fence Work

ISRAEL WILL NOT HALT SECURITY FENCE WORK
By Herb Keinon

Jerusalem Post
Sept 28 2007

Israel has no intention of stopping work on the security barrier to
lure Saudi Arabia to the US-sponsored conference on the Middle East
later this year, senior diplomatic sources said Thursday night in
response to comments made by the Saudi foreign minister in New York.

"Israel has its own security needs that we have to address," the
official said. At the same time, the official characterized Prince
Saud al-Faisal’s comments, which included some upbeat remarks about
the upcoming Mideast meeting, as "interesting," and added that Israel
always listened to what the Saudis have to say.

The New York Times reported Thursday that Faisal said Israel should
stop work on the security barrier and stop settlement activity as
good-will gestures to assure Arab states and show it was serious
about comprehensive peace talks.

Up until now, Israel has rejected Saudi conditions on participation
in the talks. Jerusalem feels, however, that Saudi participation is
critical in garnering Arab support to Israeli-PA negotiations.

Faisal stopped short, however, of making these "good-will gestures"
conditions for Saudi participation, and also sounded an optimistic
note about the meeting.

"It is not Saudi Arabia that puts conditions, or Saudi Arabia that
is going to negotiate," he told reporters Wednesday on the sidelines
of the UN General Assembly. "Its presence there, or non-presence,
is not the most significant issue." Regarding the planned conference,
he said, "We have been shown a canvas with some brushstrokes that have
nice colors in them … but we don’t yet know if it is a portrait or
a landscape that we are looking at."

Based on the discussions with US officials, "there is a sense there
is something new happening and this is encouraging" if it turns out
to be true, he said.

Faisal said that discussions indicated that "the intent is to look at
the final-status issue – the important issues, and not the peripheral
issues.

This is encouraging. This is what we have always asked for." He
said that the onus lay on the Israelis to show their commitment
to a comprehensive settlement and that they were willing to take
confidence-building measures such as freezing settlement building.

"It will be curious for (Palestinian) President Abbas and the prime
minister of Israel to be talking about peace and the return of
Palestinian land while Israel continues to build more settlements,"
he said. "At least, a moratorium on the building of settlements will
be a good signal to show serious intent."

While the US hopes that Saudi participation will put the kingdom
on a path to recognizing Israel, Faisal said this possibility was
already outlined in the Arab peace initiative, which offers peace in
exchange for a full Israeli withdrawal to the 1967 lines, including
in Jerusalem and on the Golan Heights.

"Recognition comes, but comes after peace, not before peace,"
Faisal said.

The Prime Minister’s Office had no formal response to the Saudi foreign
minister’s comments, waiting to see the full transcript, and context,
of his remarks.

In a related development, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni met Wednesday
with Tunisian Foreign Minister Abdelwaheb Abdullah, and was expected
to meet Thursday evening with her Moroccan counterpart. Israel would
like to see both countries, considered part of the "moderate" Arab
coalition, participate in November’s planned conference.

Both meetings took place on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly
meeting, which Livni is attending.

According to Livni’s spokesman, the Foreign Minister briefed her
Tunisian counterpart on the status of the current talks with the PA
and spoke of the importance of the moderate Arab countries taking
part in the process.

The meeting, the first with a Tunisian official at this level in a
number of years, took place even though Israel and Tunisia have no
formal diplomatic relations.

Livni also met on Wednesday with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan. Despite the importance of Israel’s relationship with Turkey,
and the tension caused because Israeli fuel tanks were found on the
Turkish side of the Turkish-Syrian border following Israel’s alleged
attack in Syria, the Foreign Ministry was mum on the content of
that meeting.

The Turkish press, however, reported that the current Israeli-Syrian
tensions, as well as the diplomatic process with the Palestinians,
dominated the talks. There was no word, however, on whether the
Anti-Defamation League’s recent decision to characterize the massacre
of Armenians in World War I as tantamount to genocide, a move that
could impact adversely on Turkish-Israeli ties, was raised.

Livni held a breakfast meeting Wednesday with representatives of some
20 African states, and also met with Republican presidential hopeful
Rudy Giuliani for talks that focused on the Iranian nuclear program
and the situation inside the PA.

According to Livni’s office, Giuliani said that were he still mayor of
New York, he would not have given Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
"free access and the platform" he received this week in the city.

AP contributed to this report.

109m Drams Allocated For Participation Of Armenian Delegation In 200

109M DRAMS ALLOCATED FOR PARTICIPATION OF ARMENIAN DELEGATION IN 2008 OLYMPIC GAMES

Author: Tonoyan Susanna Editor: Eghian Robert
Noyan Tapan News Agency, Armenia
Sept 25 2007

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 20, NOYAN TAPAN. In correspondence to the RA Law On
RA Budget System, the RA Government made a decision at the September
20 sitting to allocate 12m drams (nearly 35 thousand U.S. dollars)
to RA Ministry of Sport and Youth Affairs from the 2007 reserve
fund. The sum is allocated to the Chess Federation of Armenia as
a donation for organizing the World Chess Championship of boys and
girls below the age of 20 which will be held in Yerevan in 2007.

As Armen Grigorian, the RA Minister of Sport and Youth Affairs,
informed the journalists after the sitting, representatives of
40 countries have already presented bids for participation in the
championship to be held in Yerevan on October 2-17. It was mentioned
that Azerbaijan is not among them yet.

A. Grigorian also said that in total 109m drams will be allocated for
participation of Armenian delegation in 2008 Olympic Games. And in 2008
it is envisaged to allocate 850m drams to the RA sport federations.

A Philadelphia original cleans up

Posted on Tue, Sep. 25, 2007

A Phila. original cleans up

The Quickie Manufacturing Corp. is a leader in all manner of cleaning
tools. It was founded by a mop inventor who wanted his dinner on time.

By Bob Fernandez

Inquirer Staff Writer

Bedros Vosbikian had ironclad rules in his Melrose Park home. Lo and
behold, one evening in 1950, his wife, Vartanoush, failed to promptly
serve dinner when he returned from his hardware factory. Vartanoush!

The floors, Bedros, the floors, she pleaded as she scrubbed. I have to
finish the floors.

A year later, Vosbikian introduced one of the unheralded inventions of
the 20th century: the automatic sponge mop. He patented the
self-wringing action and designed the mop with chrome-plated parts and
stainless-steel springs for department stores.

Vosbikian passed Quickie Manufacturing Corp. to son Peter, who made
the mop the core of a cleaning-tools company that in 2006 manufactured
and sold 52 million mops, brooms, hand brushes, buckets, and other
cleaning-tool products.

"It’s the only one we carry," said Mitchell Cohen, owner of Cohen &
Co. Hardware, 615 E. Passyunk Ave., who was restocking sponge mops on
Wednesday. "Quickie’s a decent mop. We don’t get a lot of
returns. They don’t fall apart."

This Microsoft of Mops, so to speak, has its headquarters in a
warehouse-looking building one mile off Route 130 in a commercial
section of Cinnaminson, Burlington County. The company is privately
held and does not disclose sales, but it says it controls about 25
percent of the U.S. cleaning-tools market, estimated at $1.2 billion
at retail.

Home-center chains like the Home Depot Inc. and Lowe’s Cos. Inc. have
sections devoted to Quickie and its cleaning tools. Quickie’s biggest
revenue item is the 2-in-1 Bulldozer push broom, and its
highest-volume product is a toilet brush with container cup.

The company has begun licensing deals to co-brand new products, and it
has plans to expand into Europe. This month, Quickie launched a
scented broom with the British company Reckitt Benckiser P.L.C., which
owns Air Wick and Lysol.

The mop business, which generally flies under the radar of the
financial press, is fragmented with new entrants – everyone seems to
have an idea for a better one. Two of Quickie’s biggest competitors
are Freudenburg Household Products, which sells the O’Cedar and Vileda
mop brands, and the Libman Co., of Arcola, Ill., marketer of the
"Wonder Mop."

Brian Sowinski, director of marketing at Libman, said that the
mop-and-broom business was competitive and that "it’s sort of hard to
reinvent the wheel at this point." The products fill "a pretty basic
need," he said, noting that "people get attached to their mops."

Mop companies face imports and Procter & Gamble Co.’s Swiffer
disposable wipes, a new category called quick-clean products, which
has sponged up some of the traditional growth.

"This has always been a competitive business, even before
China. Nothing has changed," said Peter Vosbikian, 66, who is still at
the company and is Quickie’s chairman. There is a 1963 publicity photo
of Vosbikian dressed in a suit and skinny tie modeling the
"Ring-A-Mop" in the company archives. "Years ago, people were making
mops and brooms in their garages."

Like cheesesteaks and the Mummers, Bedros Vosbikian’s automatic sponge
mop is a Philadelphia original.

According to an old news clip, he developed a prototype with a broom
handle, a breadboard, a rubber sponge, an aluminum cookie sheet, wing
nuts and bolts. He manufactured the mop for years in a two-story
factory in North Philadelphia near Broad and Lehigh Streets.

In the mid-1970s, the company relocated to Cinnaminson. Less than two
years later, Quickie signed a contract to distribute through Kmart
Corp. and expanded into a former macaroni plant in Delran.

At its peak in the Philadelphia area, the company had 300 employees in
South Jersey. Quickie saw a need for more manufacturing capacity and
opened a plant in North Carolina. It closed the South Jersey plants,
but kept the headquarters, with about 70 employees, in Cinnaminson.

Michael Magerman waves a broom that scents the air in Quickie’s
conference room. "Smell that," he said, his nostrils flaring as he
sucks in the air. "I love this product."

Magerman joined Quickie as chief executive officer in 2005 after
Vosbikian sold a majority interest to the New York investment firm
Centre Partners. Financial details were not disclosed.

Magerman was raised in Jenkintown, and his father ran a Philadelphia
trousers-manufacturing plant that closed in the mid-1980s. Magerman
headed to the West Coast as a young man and cofounded Odyssey Golf
with his brother and others. Odyssey developed a new-technology putter
that gained acceptance with pros on tour. Callaway Golf Co. bought
Odyssey for $130 million in 1997. It was bittersweet for Magerman:
Callaway fired him.

"The distinguishing factor is what you do with the end of the stick,"
Magerman, 45, quips about the difference between a $10 broom and a
$100 putter.

Magerman talks about the "compelling value propositions" of Quickie
brooms and mops. He signed the licensing agreement with Reckitt
Benckiser that led to the scented broom, which will land in 14,000
U.S. stores.

He also signed a licensing agreement with Microban International
Ltd. for antimicrobial materials for Quickie products, which the
company hopes will ease concerns that dirty sponges and mops breed
germs and diseases.

Peter Vosbikian was 9 years old when his father came home to a late
dinner. The groundbreaking sponge mop that ensued "has stood the test
of time," Peter Vosbikian said.

Bedros Vosbikian, though, is mostly forgotten. "God rest his
soul. When my dad died, it was in his obituary," Peter Vosbikian
said. "But that’s about it."

A New Law To Divide Us

A NEW LAW TO DIVIDE US
By Andrew Bolt

Herald Sun (Australia)
September 19, 2007 Wednesday
FIRST Edition

LIKE most of you, I’m indigenous. I was born here and have nowhere
else to go.

This is my home, and where my heart is. If I’m not indigenous to
Australia, I’m indigenous to nowhere.

So you might think I’d cheer at Labor’s promise last week to ratify
— should it win government — the United Nations’ new Declaration
on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Except, of course, we know Labor is infected with the New Racism,
and still plays off one tribe against another.

In the case of we indigenous Australians, Labor now wants to ratify
a bizarre document that doesn’t just stop at saying some indigenous
people are more indigenous than others.

It also says the most indigenous of us — people born here, like me,
but with some Aboriginal ancestry — can be excused the laws and
obligations that apply to the rest of us. And get extra rights all
of their own.

Here’s proof that Kevin Rudd’s new Labor isn’t so new, after all,
exploiting the ethnic differences which divide us rather than
celebrating what unites.

Incidentally, for more proof, see star Labor candidate Maxine McKew,
now fighting Prime Minister John Howard for his seat of Bennelong.

She’s just promised to recognise the "Armenian genocide", hoping to
thrill Bennelong’s 4000 ethnic Armenians.

The nation’s many Turks, however, will be enraged, rightly arguing
that the death of hundreds of thousands of Armenians in the wars,
famines and inter-ethnic slaughter of the Ottoman Empire’s last years
was a tragedy, but no state-ordered genocide.

McKew’s promise can bring only strife, but harvesting votes by
preaching old divisions rather than a new unity is an old Labor ploy.

And so we see again with this UN Declaration on indigenous rights.

The wretched thing is actually the work of the UN’s discredited Human
Rights Council, which includes representatives from such beacons of
humans rights as Saudi Arabia, China, Cuba, Egypt, Pakistan and Russia.

Already you’ll have figured this is a document full of empty sentiments
that even its authors don’t believe or most certainly will never
implement.

That helps to explain why the four countries that refused to ratify
it last week are ones that take their word more seriously: Australia,
Canada, the United States and New Zealand, each of which objects that
this declaration puts ethnic laws above national ones.

But Labor’s spokesman for indigenous affairs, Jenny Macklin, can’t
wait to sign, promising "a federal Labor Government would endorse
Australia becoming a signatory".

So what is in this UN declaration, that Macklin later stressed was
"non-binding", that Labor wants to sign us up to? Read closely, because
it’s actually a blueprint for an Aboriginal nation within Australia,
with rights to its own schools, own government, own treaties and own
laws, even if as barbaric as payback:

"Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right to belong to an
indigenous community or nation . . .

"(States must give) due recognition to indigenous peoples’ laws . . .

"Indigenous peoples have the right to establish and control their
education systems . . .

"States shall consult and co-operate in good faith with the indigenous
peoples concerned through their own representative institutions . . .

"Indigenous peoples . . . have the right to maintain and develop
contacts, relations and co-operation, including activities for
spiritual, cultural, political, economic and social purposes with
. . . other peoples across borders . . .

"Indigenous peoples have the right to determine the responsibilities
of individuals to their communities."

That last one is oppressive. It says tribal strongmen can tell
Aborigines who want to join the mainstream to stick with the tribe
instead.

Macklin is now insisting she won’t let tribal law overrule the general
law. But why sign a protocol that implies the very opposite?

That supports an Aboriginal nation within Australia? That supports
separate rights — and separate development — for Aborigines,
instead of urging them to seek a future with the rest of us?

What divisive and racist foolishness. Already we can assume Labor in
office will kill the federal intervention in the Northern Territory
launched by this Government to save Aboriginal communities now drowning
in booze, violence, truancy and unemployment.

It isn’t right, a Macklin will say after the election, that "we"
trample on Aborigines’ rights to their own ways.

And once again the weak will pay for this Noble Savage myth that Labor
still worships — this insistence that Aborigines be a race apart.

They’ll be like the boy of this news story last week: "A magistrate
seeking to preserve an Aboriginal toddler’s cultural identity ignored
warnings from child protection workers and put him into the care of
his violent uncle, who four weeks later tortured and bashed the boy
almost to death . . ."

Preserve the tribe! Never mind the individual. And pit one race against
another. Pit one group of indigenous people against the rest who were
born here, and want brothers, not rivals.