Author: Jane Topchian
A Portrait of Beirut After the Explosion
RFE/RL Armenian Report – 08/10/2020
Monday, August 10, 2020
Armenian PM Congratulates Belarus’s Lukashenka On Reelection
August 10, 2020
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian (R) meeting with Belarus President
Alyaksandr Lukashenka in Yerevan, September 30, 2019
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian sent a congratulatory message to Belarus
President Alyaksandr Lukashenka on his re-election in a ballot the results of
which are disputed by his opposition challenger.
“I am confident that through joint efforts we will continue to strengthen the
friendship between our peoples, to expand mutually beneficial cooperation
between our countries both bilaterally and within the framework of international
organizations and integration associations. On my part I am ready to make every
effort to fully realize the potential of relations between our peoples and
countries,” Pashinian said in his message as quoted by his press office.
Armenian President Armen Sarkissian also congratulated Lukashenka, wishing him
“good health, success and all the best” and “the friendly people of Belarus –
peace, stability and prosperity.”
Belarus’s Central Election Commission said preliminary official results from the
August 9 presidential election show incumbent President Lukashenka winning a
landslide victory with more than 80 percent of the vote, compared to less than
10 percent for his main rival, Svyatlana Tsikhanouskaya.
Tsikhanouskaya, who drew tens of thousands of people to her campaign rallies,
refused to recognize the preliminary official results announced on Monday.
Protesters poured into the streets of Belarus's capital, Minsk, after the
balloting ended, many of them facing off against riot police.
The ballot in Belarus was followed by a night of violent clashes between police
and thousands of protesters who say exit polls and official results from the
election commission were rigged.
A human rights group in Minsk said that one protester was killed in the clashes,
but Belarus’s Interior Ministry denied that.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on August 10 condemned the
violence in Belarus, calling on the Belarusian government to “accurately” count
and publish the poll’s results.
Armenia is a member of the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union and Collective
Security Treaty Organization both of which also include Belarus.
Other leaders of the alliances, including Russian President Vladimir Putin and
Kazakhstan’s President Qasym-Zhomart Toqaev, have also sent congratulatory
telegrams to Lukashenka on his re-election.
Belarus’s autocratic leader who turns 66 later this month has occupied the
presidential post since 1994.
Authorities See Continuing ‘Positive Trend’ In Coronavirus Situation In Armenia
August 10, 2020
• Robert Zargarian
A medical worker takes notes at the Surb Grigor Lusarovich Medical Center in
Yerevan, Armenia's largest hospital treating coronavirus patients, June 5, 2020.
The number of active coronavirus cases in Armenia continued to decrease over the
weekend as the fatality rate remained relatively high, according to official
statistics.
The figures reported by the Ministry of Health show that for the first time
since early June the number of active coronavirus cases in Armenia has dropped
below 7,000. Eleven more patients died from COVID-19 over the weekend, bringing
the total number of deaths to 796.
According to the ministry, since the start of the epidemic in March 228 other
patients infected with the virus died from other pre-existing diseases.
The daily number of officially registered fatalities averaged approximately 15
from July 6 through July 24 after which a downward trend began.
As of August 10, the total number of coronavirus cases identified in Armenia has
reached 40,433. In the past weeks and days the number of daily reported cases
decreased more than twice as compared to what appears to be the peak of the
epidemic in early July when over 700 cases were identified on a daily basis.
Ministry spokesperson Alina Nikoghosian sees a continuing positive trend in the
rate of infections. “The numbers themselves show a significant decrease. But,
like we did it before, we keep repeating that vigilance must not be weakened,
because if we relax, the numbers will start growing again,” she said.
The Armenian government ascribes the recent improvement in the coronavirus
situation to the wearing of face masks in all public places that was made
mandatory in Armenia in early June and other enforced and popularized measures
like social distancing and regular washing of hands.
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and other officials have urged Armenians to
continue to follow the basic anti-epidemic rules, insisting that they can help
cope with the epidemic.
Despite the improving trend the Pashinian government intends to extend the
coronavirus-related state of emergency that ends on August 12 for another month.
Deputy Prime Minister Tigran Avinian said last week that the government will at
the same time fully or partly lift its ban on public gatherings and make it
easier for foreign nationals to enter the country. He also reaffirmed plans to
reopen all schools and universities in time for the start of the new academic
year in September.
Health Minister Arsen Torosian, meanwhile, said at a government session on
August 6 that his ministry planned more targeted and “pro-active” testing among
people working in government agencies, supermarkets, factories, banks or other
businesses as well as patients of various medical and elderly care institutions.
Critics have for months urged authorities to significantly expand COVID-19
testing, saying that it is vital for tackling the epidemic.
‘Serious Probe’ Demanded After Ex-Police Chief Obstructs Work Of RFE/RL Reporters
August 10, 2020
Former Chief of Police Vladimir Gasparian (file photo)
Several leading media organizations in Armenia have demanded that the country’s
law-enforcement agencies conduct a “serious probe” into an incident in which
former Chief of Police Vladimir Gasparian obstructed the professional activities
of an RFE/RL Armenian Service (Azatutyun) crew working on an environmental story
near Lake Sevan over the weekend.
In a joint statement disseminated on Monday the Committee To Protect Freedom of
Expression, the Yerevan Press Club, the Asparez journalists’ club and seven
other organizations stressed that the former senior official, who is notorious
for his violent conduct, “must be held accountable in accordance with the law.”
“During his time in office as chief of police Vladimir Gasparian stood out
through his arrogant attitude towards media representatives and in some cases
through his cruelty,” the statement said, referring to several such incidents in
the past, notably the 2015 and 2016 protests in Yerevan, “when more than 40
journalists and cameramen were targeted by police and were subjected to physical
violence and illegal persecution.”
The statement also made a mention of another incident in which the then chief of
police grossly insulted a local website’s reporter which then drew anger from
the journalistic community.
“All this went unpunished, and, apparently, that is the reason why today the
former chief of police continues to show indecent behavior towards journalists,”
the organizations stressed.
Gasparian, who served as chief of Armenia’s police for seven years before being
dismissed after the regime change in May 2018, drove his vehicle in the
direction of RFE/RL reporters, almost running over them, after seeing that they
were filming in the lakeside area where his house is presumably located.
Gasparian threatened the reporters, using phrases like “I’ll shoot you” and
“I’ll kill you,” and, using offensive language, he also demanded that the
reporters not show his house in their report.
RFE/RL’s Armenian Service reported the incident to police.
“We are horrified at this attack on our Armenian Service reporters, by no less
than a former chief of police,” RFE/RL’s acting President Daisy Sindelar said on
August 9.
“The reporters were covering a story of significant public interest when Mr.
Gasparian nearly struck them with his vehicle, threatened to kill them, and
forced them to erase their footage,” Sindelar said.
“We demand that police investigate the incident, and that Mr. Gasparian be held
accountable for endangering journalists who were simply doing their jobs.”
The RFE/RL reporters were working on a follow-up story after Armenia’s newly
appointed environment minister said last week that authorities planned
dismantling illegally constructed facilities and houses located near Lake Sevan.
According to media reports, a number of houses belonging to several former
high-ranking officials, including Gasparian, are affected by the decision.
On Sunday, in connection with the incident, the Armenian police formally opened
a criminal case under Article 164.3 of Armenia’s Criminal Code (“Obstruction to
the legal professional activities of a journalist accompanied with threats to
the life or health of a journalist or his/her relative”), which is punishable by
between 3 and 7 years in prison. Investigation is currently underway.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2020 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
Impact assessment of the COVID-19 outbreak on wellbeing of children and families in Armenia, June 2020
- Download report(PDF | 1.07 MB)
Armenia reported its first confirmed case of COVID-19 on March 1, 2020. World Vision Armenia commenced its immediate response soon after providing food and hygiene packages to the most vulnerable families who could not afford it.
Since March, World Vision Armenia has supported more than 3,000 families in 6 marzes and in the capital Yerevan. World Vision Armenia also provided technical equipment and internet connection to the most vulnerable families.
World Vision Armenia conducted a rapid impact assessment of the COVID-19 outbreak on the wellbeing of children and families in Armenia. The assessment aims to reveal the main problems families face because of the pandemic, particularly the problems connected with meeting the basic needs of the families, organization of educational process during the pandemic, relationships within families, and more, to develop the most appropriate response.
Pashinyan congratulates Lukashenko on controversial re-election
Turkish press: Azerbaijani lawmaker: Turkey-Azerbaijan military drills demonstrate power, courage
Recent large-scale military drills performed jointly by Turkey and Azerbaijan have demonstrated the power, bravery and defense capabilities of both nations’ armed forces, according to an Azerbaijani lawmaker.
“The military partnership constitutes an important vector of Azerbaijan-Turkey strategic cooperation,” Sevil Mikayilova, an Azerbaijani parliamentarian, told Anadolu Agency (AA) Tuesday.
Referring to the 13-day joint military exercises – which ended on Monday – a “source of pride” for both nations, Mikayilova said the drills, which involved both air and ground forces, were not the first of their kind, as the two countries have been holding such exercises on a regular basis since 2015, sometimes in partnership with neighboring Georgia.
Cooperation between Azerbaijan and Turkey is not directed against any other country or group, she stressed, referring to cooperation as “for the sake of peace and partnership” springing from the two states’ historical and cultural roots and ethnic identity.
“For Azerbaijan, Turkey is the closest ally and fraternal country,” Mikayilova said.
Turkey and Azerbaijan, with the participation of the countries’ air and ground forces, launched joint military drills in the wake of recent Armenian attacks on Azerbaijani border points.
The war exercises began on July 29, with Aug. 5 being the last day of ground engagements – including artillery, armored vehicles and mortars striking simulated targets – in the capital Baku and the exclave of Nakhchivan, Azerbaijan’s autonomous region bordering Turkey. Air combat drills involving jets and helicopters continued in Baku, Nakhchivan, Ganja, Kurdamir and Yevlakh until Monday.
Mikayilova also underlined that Ankara had always supported Baku’s “fair position” on resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh issue between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
“We are grateful to brotherly Turkey for the immediate support it demonstrated during the last attacks,” she said.
“Turkey has many times stated that they regard the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict as a domestic issue and that Ankara would never change its position on this problem.”
Last month, Armenia attacked Azerbaijani troops in the northwestern Tovuz border region. As a result, at least 12 Azerbaijani soldiers, including a major general and a colonel, were killed and another four soldiers wounded. A 76-year-old Azerbaijani citizen also lost his life.
Azerbaijan accused Armenia of taking “provocative” actions, with Ankara warning Yerevan it would not hesitate to stand against any kind of attack on Azerbaijan.
Nagorno-Karabakh, an internationally recognized territory of Azerbaijan, has been under illegal Armenian occupation since 1991.
International organizations, including the United Nations, have demanded the withdrawal of the occupational forces.
Relations between Turkey and Azerbaijan are seen as “exemplary worldwide” and are developing at a high level in almost every sphere, she said.
Unity between the two countries lays the groundwork for all regional cooperation formats, Mikayilova said, adding that this unity promotes regional peace and cooperation.
Following the recent skirmishes on the frontier, there is currently “a relative calm” on the border between Azerbaijan and Armenia, but overall, the situation remains “highly tense,” she said.
The lawmaker highlighted that frequent armistice breaches on the line of contact were another “source of tension” showing how “fragile” the cease-fire agreement remained.
“So we feel a colossal threat to our western borders from the part of Armenia, and war could flare up any moment due to Armenia’s unpredictable behavior and provocations.”
The recent attacks on Azerbaijani positions in Tovuz were not random but had “precise aims,” said Mikayilova.
Mikayilova stressed that the unresolved Nagorno-Karabakh conflict was a threat to regional security.
She said over the last quarter-century the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group had been “quite an ineffective platform” for resolving the conflict.
The OSCE Minsk Group, co-chaired by France, Russia and the United States, was formed in 1992 to find a peaceful solution to the conflict but to no avail.
“The OSCE Minsk Group failed to create an available mechanism or initiate any proposal to push the peace diplomacy from the deadlock. Organizing talks between the conflicting sides just for the sake of talks and making a declarative statement just for the sake of a statement could not change the status quo in the negotiation process,” she said.
Mikayilova urged the group to impose “strict sanctions” on the aggressor country – Armenia – to fulfill its international obligations.
“The OSCE Minsk Group needs to distinguish an aggressor country from a country subjected to aggression.”
Would Trump Go to War With Iran to Get Reelected?
The Nation
The administration’s escalating aggression toward Iran could be
leading to a full-blown war ahead of the November election.
By Bob Dreyfuss
August 13, 2020
Was Donald Trump’s January 3 drone assassination of Maj. Gen. Qasem
Soleimani the first step in turning the simmering cold war between the
United States and Iran into a hot war in the weeks before an American
presidential election? Of course, there’s no way to know, but behind
by double digits in most national polls and flanked by ultra-hawkish
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Trump is a notoriously impetuous and
erratic figure. In recent weeks, for instance, he didn’t hesitate to
dispatch federal paramilitary forces to American cities run by
Democratic mayors and his administration also seems to have launched a
series of covert actions against Tehran that look increasingly overt
and have Iran watchers concerned about whether an October surprise
could be in the cards.
Much of that concern arises from the fact that, across Iran, things
have been blowing up or catching fire in ways that have seemed both
mysterious and threatening. Early last month, for instance, a
suspicious explosion at an Iranian nuclear research facility at
Natanz, which is also the site of its centrifuge production, briefly
grabbed the headlines. Whether the site was severely damaged by a bomb
smuggled into the building or some kind of airstrike remains unknown.
“A Middle Eastern intelligence official said Israel planted a bomb in
a building where advanced centrifuges were being developed,” reported
The New York Times. Similar fiery events have been plaguing the
country for weeks. On June 26, for instance, there was “a huge
explosion in the area of a major Iranian military and weapons
development base east of Tehran.” On July 15, seven ships caught fire
at an Iranian shipyard. Other mysterious fires and explosions have hit
industrial facilities, a power plant, a missile production factory, a
medical complex, a petrochemical plant, and other sites as well.
“Some officials say that a joint American-Israeli strategy is
evolving—some might argue regressing—to a series of short-of-war
clandestine strikes,” concluded another report in the Times.
Some of this sabotage has been conducted against the backdrop of a
two-year-old “very aggressive” CIA action plan to engage in offensive
cyber attacks against that country. As a Yahoo! News investigative
report put it: “The Central Intelligence Agency has conducted a series
of covert cyber operations against Iran and other targets since
winning a secret victory in 2018 when President Trump signed what
amounts to a sweeping authorization for such activities, according to
former US officials with direct knowledge of the matter… The finding
has made it easier for the CIA to damage adversaries’ critical
infrastructure, such as petrochemical plants.”
Meanwhile, on July 23, two US fighter jets buzzed an Iranian civilian
airliner in Syrian airspace, causing its pilot to swerve and drop
altitude suddenly, injuring a number of the plane’s passengers.
For many in Iran, the drone assassination of Soleimani—and the
campaign of sabotage that followed—has amounted to a virtual
declaration of war. The equivalent to the Iranian major general’s
presidentially ordered murder, according to some analysts, would have
been Iran assassinating Secretary of State Pompeo or Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, although such analogies actually
understate Soleimani’s stature in the Iranian firmament.
In its aftermath, Iran largely held its fire, its only response being
a limited, telegraphed strike at a pair of American military bases in
Iraq. If Soleimani’s murder was intended to draw Iran into a
tit-for-tat military escalation in an election year, it failed. So
perhaps the United States and Israel designed the drumbeat of attacks
against critical Iranian targets this summer as escalating
provocations meant to goad Iran into retaliating in ways that might
provide an excuse for a far larger US response.
Such a conflict-to-come would be unlikely to involve US ground forces
against a nation several times larger and more powerful than Iraq.
Instead, it would perhaps involve a sustained campaign of airstrikes
against dozens of Iranian air defense installations and other military
targets, along with the widespread network of facilities that the
United States has identified as being part of that country’s nuclear
research program.
The “Art” of the Deal in 2020
In addition to military pressure and fierce sanctions against the
Iranian economy, Washington has been cynically trying to take
advantage of the fact that Iran, already in a weakened state, has been
especially hard hit by the Covid-19 pandemic. Those American sanctions
have, for instance, made it far harder for that country to get the
economic support and medical and humanitarian supplies it so
desperately needs, given its soaring death count.
According to a report by the European Leadership Network,
Rather than easing the pressure during the crisis, the United
States has applied four more rounds of sanctions since February and
contributed to the derailing of Iran’s application for an IMF
[International Monetary Fund] loan. The three special financial
instruments designed to facilitate the transfer of humanitarian aid to
Iran in the face of secondary sanctions on international banking
transactions…have proven so far to have been one-shot channels,
stymied by US regulatory red tape.
To no avail did Human Rights Watch call on the United States in April
to ease its sanctions in order to facilitate Iran’s ability to grapple
with the deadly pandemic, which has officially killed nearly 17,000
people since February (or possibly, if a leaked account of the
government’s actual death figures is accurate, nearly 42,000).
Iran has every reason to feel aggrieved. At great political risk,
President Hassan Rouhani and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei agreed in
2015 to a deal with the United States and five other world powers over
Iran’s nuclear research program. That accord, the Joint Comprehensive
Plan of Action (JCPOA), accomplished exactly what it was supposed to
do: It led Iran to make significant concessions, cutting back both on
its nuclear research and its uranium enrichment program in exchange
for an easing of economic sanctions by the United States and other
trade partners.
Though the JCPOA worked well, in 2018 President Trump unilaterally
withdrew from it, reimposed far tougher sanctions on Iran, began what
the administration called a campaign of “maximum pressure” against
Tehran, and since assassinating Soleimani has apparently launched
military actions just short of actual war. Inside Iran, Trump’s
confrontational stance has helped tilt politics to the right,
undermining Rouhani, a relative moderate, and eviscerating the
reformist movement there. In elections for parliament in February,
ultraconservatives and hardliners swept to a major victory.
But the Iranian leadership can read a calendar, too. Like voters in
the United States, they know that the Trump administration is probably
going to be voted out of office in three months. And they know that,
in the event of war, it’s more likely than not that many
Americans—including, sadly, some hawkish Democrats in Congress, and
influential analysts at middle-of-the-road Washington think tanks—will
rally to the White House. So unless the campaign of covert warfare
against targets in Iran were to intensify dramatically, the Iranian
leadership isn’t likely to give Trump, Pompeo, and crew the excuse
they’re looking for.
As evidence that Iran’s leadership is paying close attention to the
president’s electoral difficulties, Khamenei only recently rejected in
the most explicit terms possible what most observers believe is yet
another cynical ploy by the American president, when he suddenly asked
Iran to reengage in direct leader-to-leader talks. In a July 31
speech, the Iranian leader replied that Iran is well aware Trump is
seeking only sham talks to help him in November. (In June, Trump
tweeted Iran: “Don’t wait until after the U.S. Election to make the
Big deal! I’m going to win!”) Indeed, proving that Washington has no
intention of negotiating with Iran in good faith, after wrecking the
JCPOA and ratcheting up sanctions, the Trump administration announced
an onerous list of 12 conditions that would have to precede the start
of such talks. In sum, they amounted to a demand for a wholesale,
humiliating Iranian surrender. So much for the art of the deal in
2020.
October Surprises, Then and Now
Meanwhile, the United States isn’t getting much support from the rest
of the world for its thinly disguised effort to create chaos, a
possible uprising, and the conditions to force regime change on Iran
before November 3. At the United Nations, when Secretary of State
Pompeo called on the Security Council to extend an onerous arms
embargo on Iran, not only did Russia and China promise to veto any
such resolution but America’s European allies opposed it, too. They
were particularly offended by Pompeo’s threat to impose “snapback”
economic sanctions on Iran as laid out in the JCPOA if the arms
embargo wasn’t endorsed by the council. Not lost on the participants
was the fact that, in justifying his demand for such new UN sanctions,
the American secretary of state was invoking the very agreement that
Washington had unilaterally abandoned. “Having quit the JCPOA, the
U.S. is no longer a participant and has no right to trigger a snapback
at the U.N.,” was the way China’s UN ambassador put it.
That other emerging great power has, in fact, become a major spoiler
and Iranian ally against the Trump administration’s regime-change
strategy, even as its own relations with Washington grow grimmer by
the week. Last month, the The New York Times reported that Iran and
China had inked “a sweeping economic and security partnership that
would clear the way for billions of dollars of Chinese investments in
energy and other sectors, undercutting the Trump administration’s
efforts to isolate the Iranian government.” The 18-page document
reportedly calls for closer military cooperation and a $400 billion
Chinese investment and trade accord that, among other things, takes
direct aim at the Trump-Pompeo effort to cripple Iran’s economy and
its oil exports.
According to Shireen Hunter, a veteran Middle Eastern analyst at
Georgetown University, that accord should be considered a
world-changing one, as it potentially gives China “a permanent
foothold in Iran” and undermines “U.S. strategic supremacy in the
[Persian] Gulf.” It is, she noted with some alarm, a direct result of
Trump’s anti-Iranian obsession and Europe’s reluctance to confront
Washington’s harsh sanctions policy.
On June 20, in a scathing editorial, The Washington Post agreed,
ridiculing the administration’s “maximum pressure” strategy against
Iran. Not only had the president failed to bring down Iran’s
government or compelled it to change its behavior in conflicts in
places like Syria and Yemen, but now, in a powerful blow to US
interests, “an Iranian partnership with China…could rescue Iran’s
economy while giving Beijing a powerful new place in the region.”
If, however, the traditional Washington foreign policy establishment
believes that Trump’s policy toward Iran is backfiring and so working
against US hegemony in the Persian Gulf, his administration seems not
to care. As evidence mounts that its approach to Iran isn’t having the
intended effect, the White House continues apace: squeezing that
country economically, undermining its effort to fight Covid-19,
threatening it militarily, appointing an extra-hard-liner as its
“special envoy” for Iran, and apparently (along with Israel) carrying
out a covert campaign of terrorism inside the country.
Over the past four decades, “October surprise” has evolved into a
catch-all phrase meaning any unexpected action by a presidential
campaign just before an election designed to give one of the
candidates a surprise advantage. Ironically, its origins lay in Iran.
In 1980, during the contest between President Jimmy Carter and former
California governor Ronald Reagan, rumors surfaced that Carter might
stage a raid to rescue scores of American diplomats then held captive
in Tehran. (He didn’t.) According to other reports, the Reagan
campaign had made clandestine contact with Tehran aimed at persuading
that country not to release its American hostages until after the
election. (Two books, October Surprise by Gary Sick, a senior national
security adviser to Carter, and Trick or Treason by investigative
journalist Bob Parry delved into the possibility that candidate
Reagan, former CIA director Bill Casey, and others had engaged in a
conspiracy with Iran to win that election.)
Consider it beyond irony if, this October, the latest election
“surprise” were to take us back to the very origins of the term in the
form of some kind of armed conflict that could only end terribly for
everyone involved. It’s a formula for disaster and like so many other
things, when it comes to Donald J. Trump, it can’t be ruled out.
Bob DreyfussBob Dreyfuss, a Nation contributing editor, is an
independent investigative journalist who specializes in politics and
national security.
Armenian FM discusses Turkish provocations with Greek, Cypriot counterparts
President Sarkissian and PM Pashinyan hold working meeting
20:35,
YEREVAN, AUGUST 11, ARMENPRESS. President of Armenia Armen Sarkissian held a regular working meeting with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan at the Presidential Residence on August 11.
As ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the President’s Office, Armen Sarkissian and Nikol Pashinyan discussed issues referring to the current problems facing the country and development programs.
The leaders of the country shared the opinion that despite the declining numbers of COVID-19 cases, it’s necessary to strictly follow the anti-pandemic rules, given the fact that many countries have returned to strict limitations after seemingly overcoming the pandemic.
Referring to the social-economic situation of the country, Nikol Pashinyan noted that 70 thousand jobs had been cut in April, but by June 50 thousand jobs were already restored. ‘’It was clear for me that if were had been guided only by health factors, now we would be facing social collapse’’, he said, adding that for now the priority task for the Government is to preserve and create new jobs. He emphasized that 100 billions MAD have already been invested by the state and banking system in social and economic directions.
Referring to the developments in Tavush Province in mid-July, the President and the Prime Minister emphasized that it was a direct aggression by Azerbaijan against Armenia, violating not only international laws, but also moral boundaries, given the fact that the international community is struggling against the global enemy – COVID-19. In this context, the leaders of the country expressed satisfaction for that the Armenian Armed Forces were able to once again prove that they have the strongest army in the region.
Editing and translating by Tigran Sirekanyan
23 new cases, 5 dead from COVID-19 over last 24 hours, Armenian CDC
11:08,
YEREVAN, AUGUST 10, ARMENPRESS. 23 new cases of COVID-19 have been recorded over the last 24 hours in Armenia, bringing the total cumulative number of confirmed cases to 40433.
96 patients recovered, raising the number of recoveries to 32616, the National Center for Disease Control and Prevention said.
5 patients died from complications.
The total death toll from COVID-19 in Armenia is 796. This number doesn’t include the deaths of 228 other people infected with the virus, who died from other pre-existing conditions.
Only 340 tests were conducted in the last 24 hours.
A total of 176354 tests were done since the outbreak began.
The number of active cases as of 11:00 Yerevan time, August 10 stood at 6793.
Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan