Can storytelling help overcome war trauma? This Armenian film lab wants to reshape the narrative of the Syrian conflict

Calvert Journal
 
 
Culture Profile Armenia
 
 
 
 
The hakawati — Arabic for storyteller — once played a central role in Middle Eastern society, drawing together communities and disparate crowds. Based in Armenia’s lush Lori region, the modern-day Hakawati Project hopes to do similar work: healing the wounds of the war in Syria by forging new bonds and new stories.
 
 

Text: Lucía de la Torre
Top image: Sasha Baranovskaya

The Syrian War has affected the lives of millions, but much of the media narrative around the crisis has been shaped by those who view the conflict from the outside. No experience of war is the same, yet for many survivors, it is still disorienting when their memories of an event do not match the story that is told to the world.

Actress, writer, producer, and activist Sona Tatoyan is a first-generation Armenian-American from Syria who grew up between the Armenian community in Aleppo and the United States. “As a child, I was struck by how history books in the United States never mentioned the Armenian Genocide, even though these stories were essential to my family’s identity as survivors of conflict,” Tatoyan told The Calvert Journal. “From an early age, I knew I could not trust official accounts of history.”

Tatoyan felt as if part of her identity had been erased. She realised that there was a deep problem in how mainstream narratives constructed reality. Years later, when her family in Syria found themselves as victims once more, Tatoyan realised that she did not want individual stories such as theirs to be overshadowed by Western mainstream discourse. The Hakawati Project was born in order to fight back.

Scheduled to take place in the northern Armenian region of Lori in the summer of 2021, the project encompasses a comprehensive, two-month filmmaking lab aimed at those from communities affected by the Syrian conflict. During the programme, the participants will gather in Armenia to take part in workshops in different disciplines of cinema, before releasing six short films to tell the story of the Syrian crisis in fresh, unseen ways. “We hope that victims will be able to harness the power of the narrative,” Tatoyan says, “using it to tell their own stories and democratise the mainstream discourse”.

Despite still being in its development phase, the project is already transnational in practice and Armenian in nature, bringing together professionals and activists from Armenia, the diaspora, and abroad. Organised in partnership with the Sundance Institute and Film Independent — both LA-based nonprofit arts organisations — on the ground, the project relies on the TUMO Center for Creative Technologies, an educational program in technology and design based in Armenia, and The Independent Filmmaker’s Community of Armenia. Following the pilot edition of the project, Tatoyan’s long-term dream would be to set up an independent film institute in Armenia. “It is through storytelling that we understand commonality and truly put ourselves in someone else’s skin,” she says.

As a country with a history of suffering and rising from the ashes, Tatoyan believes that Armenia will serve as an appropriate spot to build more bridges between victims of the Syrian war and international audiences, who are now often numbed and overwhelmed with faceless statistics and anonymous stories. At the start of the 20th century, Syria served as refuge for the thousands of civilians fleeing the Armenian Genocide, later becoming home to one of the biggest Armenian diaspora communities in the world. A century later, Armenia has taken in around 20,000 Syrian refugees, most of them of ethnic Armenian background.

Armenians, she says, are storytellers by nature. “The streets of Yerevan are named after writers, poets, and musicians. Armenians have historically been victims of the narrative, yet have found ways to transform it and move forward,” Tatoyan says. “With the arrival of Syrian refugees, Armenia has the chance to sublimate its own trauma and turn it into a valuable lesson”. The Hakawati Project aims to amplify the voices of those often silenced in mainstream media to help them transform the discourse and overcome wartime trauma. “Whoever tells the story, has the power to shape the culture. Filmmaking, both healing and informative, can reshape the narrative of the Syrian conflict.”




 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

IDBank joins Armenian government’s programs aimed at neutralizing economic consequences of COVID-19

IDBank joins Armenian government's programs aimed at neutralizing economic consequences of COVID-19

Save

Share

 17:39,

YEREVAN, APRIL 10, ARMENPRESS. Recognizing the importance of increasing economic activity in the country, IDBank begins accepting credit applications as part of measures to neutralize the economic consequences of the coronavirus (COVID-19).

The project will provide support to enterprises, giving them the opportunity to attract affordable financial resources to ensure the continuity of business activities in the face of new challenges.

The loans will be provided to legal entities and individual entrepreneurs on the principles of co-financing, refinancing and subsidizing. The terms of the loans are determined in accordance with the government’s economic support specific measures, as well as the loan objectives. The Bank will not charge fees for loan application services, provision of loans, loan and other services.

In order to take advantage of the loans with preferential terms, borrowers can submit an online application to the Bank at https://www.idbank.am/content/contacts/ by selecting the "Loans" topic and filling out the required fields or by sending an email to [email protected].

Young woman injured in landmine explosion in Armenia’s Ararat Province

News.am, Armenia
April 6 2020

13:44, 06.04.2020
                  

A young woman was injured in a landmine explosion Sunday in Paruyr Sevak village of Armenia’s Ararat Province. The head of the community, Eduard Stepanyan, informed Armenian News-NEWS.am about this.

“She had gone to collect beets with her mother-in-law; there were 3 other women with them,” he noted. "Fortunately, they were not injured. The woman was taken to Astghik hospital [in Yerevan]; most likely, her leg will be amputated."

The village head added that the 33-year-old woman had three minor children and that it was very difficult to remove her from the area because it was a minefield and civilians were not allowed to enter.

And Police informed Armenian News-NEWS.am that they had received a call from the aforesaid hospital that they had admitted a Paruyr Sevak village resident, who was born in 1987.

It was found out that she had accidentally stepped on a landmine, and this had caused an explosion which injured her.

The circumstances are being clarified.

A report is being prepared.

Armenian brothers making COVID-19 face-visors for London hospitals

Public Radio of Armenia
April 7 2020

Elections in Nagorno-Karabakh don’t dismiss democracy

New Europe
April 3 2020

<img src=”"https://www.neweurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/p15a.jpg" alt="Richard Giragosian" class=""post-thumb-wrap" style = "background-size: cover;background-position: 10%;width:50px;height:50px;background-image:url('');margin:5px 0;border-radius: 90px;border: 1px solid rgb(88, 90, 12);border-radius: 50px/50px; /* horizontal radius / vertical radius */""> By Richard Giragosian

Founding Director of the Regional Studies Center

Normally, a free and fair election is a welcome exercise of democracy and freedom.  But in the case of the unrecognised Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh, a well-managed, multi-candidate and multi-party contest that would usually merit praise elsewhere garnered a quite different reaction.

Beyond the criticism of the election from Azerbaijan, which given the disputed status of Armenian-populated Karabakh region was expected, the European Union also reiterated that it “does not recognise the constitutional and legal framework” of the election, adding that the contest “cannot prejudice the determination of the future status of Nagorno-Karabakh or the outcome of the ongoing negotiation process.”

For their part, the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs (France, Russia and the United States) also weighed in with a statement on March 31, issued as the sole diplomatic entity empowered to mediate Karabakh conflict.  In their response, they also noted that they “do not accept the results of these ‘elections’ as affecting the legal status of Nagorno-Karabakh and stress that the results in no way prejudge the final status of Nagorno-Karabakh or the outcome of the ongoing negotiations to bring a lasting and peaceful settlement to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.”

Recognising the legal constraints and diplomatic precedents inherent in any response by either the EU or the OSCE mediators, such criticism should not come as a surprise.  Nor should its relevance be overstated.  Nevertheless, for the international community, as well as for the EU and OSCE, there should be a more candid appreciation of the importance of democracy in Karabakh as both an imperative and an impulse toward creating a new environment more conducive to resolving the conflict through diplomacy over the force of arms.

Moreover, as is especially evident in the current crisis within the European Union (most notably as in the case of Hungary most recently), the Karabakh election stands out as a rare confirmation and endorsement of European values and norms.

But to be fair, in Karabakh (or “Artsakh” as it is locally termed), the combined presidential-parliamentary election of March 31 was not held in normal times.  And there are two factors that make this election both significant and different.

First, as a conflict-prone to diplomatic deadlock, any advance in democracy by any of the parties to the conflict must be an important step forward.  Following Armenia’s own “Velvet Revolution,” as an example of a successful non-violent victory for democracy, the deepening of democracy in Karabakh can only offer fresh optimism in the outlook for sincere peace talks.  And against that backdrop, it only heightens the contrast with authoritarian Azerbaijan, which has done far too little to demonstrate goodwill or a genuine commitment to a negotiated resolution to the Karabakh conflict.

Thus, from this perspective, the election result was actually less important than the election itself, as a strengthening of democracy and an affirmation of democratic values and ideals.  And with the successful rite of passage of democratic elections in both Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh, the burden now is on Azerbaijan to graduate to a higher role as a true “partner for peace.”

But unlike the more optimistic implications outlined above, the second factor making this election especially different is the bad timing.  More specifically, after an inconclusive first round of voting, the Karabakh authorities resolved to hold a repeat election on April 14.  But this move may be seen as an exercise in poor judgement or even an example of public irresponsibility.  Such an indictment stems from the stubborn refusal to postpone the run-off, particularly because in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, these are clearly not normal times.  From this perspective, even the presidential and parliamentary election of March 31 was a grave concern, and perhaps a serious mistake.

Although the threat of infection and contagion was obvious throughout the public campaign, the voting process itself only magnifies the threat of infection as large numbers of people congregate and come out to vote.  In this period of global quarantine, isolation, social distancing and lockdown, it was not only irresponsible for the Karabakh authorities to proceed with the vote, but with the decision to hold a second-round run-off election in mid-April, it is also a looming threat, tempting fate a second time.

Moreover, the threat from any election in Karabakh is magnified by the presence of large numbers of military personnel, where confined quarters of troops are especially vulnerable to infection and the rapid spread of the virus. And as one of the most militarised societies in the world, the potential danger and elevated risk are being seriously ignored.  Thus, this stubborn reluctance to hold yet another election is an act of irresponsibility and failure of leadership, the implications are far more severe than ever before. Any outbreak from a second voting day may ravage not only the population of Karabakh and beyond but would pose a “second wave” threat of viral contagion in Armenia, not to mention a possible outbreak that may decimate the armed forces.

Therefore, looking forward, there is an overriding opportunity to focus on the more pressing public health threat, which is a shared crisis that requires a shared response.  Perhaps in this new context of the coronavirus emergency and bolstered by a fresh “wave” of democracy in Karabakh, as well as in Armenia previously, the Nagorno Karabakh conflict will benefit from a renewed sense of urgency and commitment by all parties to the conflict.  Otherwise, the earlier status quo will become an even more deadly “race to the bottom” for all.

Government to focus on creation of new jobs – PM Pashinyan

Save

Share

 14:57, 4 April, 2020

YEREVAN, APRIL 4, ARMENPRESS. Serious changes will take place in the labor market as a result of coronavirus and the Government will focus on the creation of new jobs, ARMENPRESS reports PM Pashinyan said during a consultation on the process of the implementation of capital projects.

''We think that the primary tool is the effective implementation of capital expenditures and the expansion of such expenditures. Today in fact, the activities of the Government is divided into two parts. The first part is the activities of the Commandant's House, the task of which is to prevent the spread of the virus or take its spread under control and creating conditions as soon as possible for more and more businesses to be able to work without resulting in outbreak of epidemic. We all understand that it's quite a complicated task and this is the reason why the Government declared state of emergency'', the PM said.

According to Nikol Pashinyan, the 2nd direction of the activities of the Government is the development and adoption of social and economic assistance programs, as well as fostering capital expenditures, which become more and more important.

Edited and translated by Tigran Sirekanyan

Sports: Arsenal reject £10m offer from European giants for star

Caught Offside
April 4 2020
 
 
Arsenal reject £10m offer from European giants for star
Arsenal FC
Posted by Jaikuran Randhawa 1 day ago
Follow @jaikuran1998
 
According to the Express, Arsenal have rejected two bids from Roma for Henrikh Mkhitaryan, with the Italian outfit’s last bid worth around £10m.
 
The Express claim that Roma are keen to sign the Armenian star permanently considering his success whilst on loan with the Serie A outfit.
 
The report adds that the Gunners have set an £18m price-tag for the attacking midfielder, and the north London outfit’s refusal to budge on this valuation could see Roma turn their attentions to Chelsea’s Pedro.
 
The Express even add that Mkhitaryan has informed friends that he’s willing to secure a pay cut in order to seal a permanent move to Paulo Fonseca’s side.
 
Mkhitaryan has managed to look solid for Roma, despite having to battle some injury troubles earlier in the season. The ace has scored six goals and registered three assists from 17 appearances this term.
 
Are Arsenal being naive with their valuation of the former Borussia Dortmund star? Will this stance lead to the Gunners missing out on the chance to receive a decent fee for a player that hasn’t worked out at the Emirates?
 
 

Asbarez: Countries Opposing Artsakh Elections Betray Democratic Values, Says ANC-International

April 2, 2020

ANC-International

On March 31, 2020, the Republic of Artsakh (Nagorno Karabakh) successfully held its presidential (sixth) and parliamentary (seventh) elections, with the Central Election Commission (CEC) reporting that 72.7 percent (76,728 voters) of Artsakh’s 105,540 eligible voters cast ballots at polling places across the republic.

Sadly, several individual states and international organizations responded to this exercise in democratic self-government by joining with the authoritarian regimes of Azerbaijan and Turkey in refusing to recognize and – in some cases – even condemning these elections. Others withheld direct criticism, explaining their refusal to recognize the legal framework of these presidential and parliamentary elections considering the ongoing OSCE Minsk Process for peacefully resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

We remind all those offering such ill-advised criticism that the initial OSCE/CSCE decision of March 24, 1992, which laid the very foundation for the Minsk Process, refers directly to the “elected representatives” of Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) as a participant in the peace process. It goes without saying, that, in order to have “elected representatives,” elections must be held, meaning that these Artsakh elections are not at odds with the OSCE but, rather, fully in line with the foundational OSCE agreements at the heart of the Minsk Group process.

The OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs, in their March 31, 2020, statement on these elections, properly noted that they “recognize the role of the population of Nagorno-Karabakh in deciding its future.” Yet they contradict this commonsense conclusion by saying that these elections – and the leaders democratically chosen by this free and fair electoral process – do not have any bearing on the legal status of Nagorno-Karabakh. They further seek to dismiss the human and civil rights of Artsakh citizens by saying “that Nagorno-Karabakh is not recognized as an independent and sovereign state by any of the Co-Chair countries or any other country,” when such rights are inalienable and not contingent upon any third party acceptance or agreement. Having rejected democracy for Artsakh and denied its citizens the right to vote, the OSCE Co-Chairs seemingly believe that this population should be represented by means other than popular elections.

States and state-level bodies aligning with the corrupt and authoritarian Azerbaijani government’s attack on free and fair Artsakh elections do a disservice to their own international commitments and obligations to uphold and defend the universal principle that: “All peoples have the right of self-determination,” including the right to freely determine their political status through “genuine periodic elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret ballot, guaranteeing the free _expression_ of the will of the electors.” (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 19 December 1966).

The Armenian National Committee-International, in cooperation with partner organizations worldwide, will continue to strive for the international recognition of the right to self-determination of the people of Artsakh and of independence of the Republic of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh). We expect, in fact, we demand, that states and international organizations claiming to be committed to human rights, justice, and peace refrain from any actions hindering the exercise of these rights and freedoms by the people of Artsakh to self-determination. The international community is obliged to assist Artsakh to express the will of its population through free and fair elections.

ARMENIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE-INTERNATIONAL

ACNIS reView from Yerevan #11, 2020_Editorial_The Pandemic and the World Order

Editorial    

28 MARCH 2020  

The coronavirus epidemic seems to be transforming the world.  Regional conflicts have been frozen, and the UN secretary general is trying to formalize that development.  Governments are in panic, concerned about possibly large-scale economic crisis and, as its consequence, social explosions.  Simultaneously, and without coordination, new formats for the regulation of education and employment are being organized.  The planet has turned small in a way, and states have been compelled to cooperate more closely, at the same time closing borders in front of each other.  Everyone agrees that the world is changing, but we can only suggest scenarios as to the directions in which we might move.

The European Union, which constituted the symbol of globalization and was the godfather of that greatest project of the 20th Century, is turning out to be, it seems, coronavirus’s most probable victim or, more correctly, the symbol of globalization’s decline.  While those considered globalization’s enemies, such as the most influential Trump and Putin, together with Britain (Brexit is one of the most blatant anti-globalist initiatives), have become the beneficiaries of none other than the coronavirus.

During one of the debates in the EU parliament on the struggle against the virus, many would note that the main fighters were the nation-states because the international bodies were not effective.  The Estonian president suggested that, against the backdrop of the pandemic, the EU was unable to carry out its main mission—to facilitate the work of a united market, to secure a union of national governments.

It is noteworthy that throughout history during epidemics the role of local governments increases.  In particular, as a result of the 14th Century’s great plague, during which many say Europe lost more than half of its population, the role of the Catholic Church (the EU of the time) began to weaken and the significance of the local authorities started to rise.  That was also a strong signal aimed toward the future “Reformation” against the Catholic Church.

At the present moment, as fate would have it, as a result of the virus, Turkey’s blackmail connected with sending refugees to Europe completely failed.  Now there is a convincing reason to shut down the frontiers, at once solving the refugee knot.

The borders are being closed, the common market is crumbling, a string of rights (_expression_, movement, etc) is being restricted, hopefully temporarily.  However, any temporary limitation has the power of inertia, especially when many “threaten” that similar plagues can recur more frequently.

In a word, as with the medieval plagues, today’s epidemics change our mentality, value system, economic structure, and so on.

But the main thing is: are we capable of keeping up with the world and also changing, becoming a more prudent society, and transforming our state policy?  In such cases, the winners are those nations which presage the pulse of the time and, before the others, orient themselves in extraordinary circumstances.