Azerbaijan increases defence budget

ITAR-TASS, Russia
June 25 2005
Azerbaijan increases defence budget

BAKU, June 25 (Itar-Tass) — Azerbaijani President Ilkham Aliyev said
his country has increased the defence budget because Russia is moving
military hardware from its base in Georgia to Armenia.
`It is true that this hardware is not handed over to Armenia but
remains at the disposal of the Russian base. But still it will be
transferred to Armenia, and this required us to take proper steps,
which we did by increasing defence expenditures in the budget,’ the
president said on Saturday as he addressed the graduates of the
Azerbaijani Higher Military School named after his father.
Aliyev said the increase in defence capabilities is necessary in
order to `resolve the Karabakh conflict’.
`We will use all diplomatic and political methods, but the adversary
must know that the Azerbaijani army can mobilise at any moment and
liberate the occupied territories,’ he said.
`We will not step aside from our position even by an inch,’ Aliyev
said, adding, ‘The biggest compromise Azerbaijan has made in the
resolution of the Karabakh conflict is that the country remains
committed to a peaceful settlement.’

Final Sitting of Still Acting NKR NA Fails Due To Absence of Quorum

FINAL SITTING OF STILL ACTING NKR NA FAILS BECAUSE OF ABSENCE OF
QUORUM
STEPANAKERT, JUNE 22, NOYAN TAPAN. The final sitting of NKR National
Assembly with the former staff was to be convened on June 22. But the
sitting failed because of absence of quorum. The convocation of the
final sitting was postponed for a week. According to the Liberty radio
station, there were members of ARF faction among those who were
absent. Their absence is conditioned by the incident connected with
former freedom-fighter Pavel Manukian, member of their party nominated
by the ARF Movement-88 bloc’s proportional list in the June 19
parliamentary elections. According to eye-witnesses, on June 21, at
about 2 pm, two servicemen took P.Manukian, holder of the “Combat
Cross” order of second degree, to city hospital. Manukian was beaten
and had injuries dangerous for his life. According to some
information, he was beaten at the Ministry of Defence. According to
the radio station, journalists are still prohibited to enter the
hospital but the victim’s relatives said that the doctors registered
concussion of the brain, now P.Manukian has regained consciousness and
is able to testify about the incident to the investigators of the
Prosecutor’s Office. Vahan Badasian, member of ARF faction, assured
that they will do their best “to solve the issue within the framework
of the law.” “The criminal must be found sooner or later,” the ARF
member said.

How should Turkey face genocide charges?

KurdishMedia, UK
June 23 2005
How should Turkey face genocide charges?

23/06/2005 Bianet.org – By Tolga Korkut

Academics urge the government prepare “facing the past” vis-a-vis
“Armenian Genocide” charges in the Ottoman Empire. Macar advises the
state give up denial, while Caglar points to the fact that Turkey
needs to consider international community.
BIA (Istanbul) – As Turkish leaders angrily rebuff the recent German
Parliament decision calling Turkey recognize `Armenian Genocide’ in
1915, political scientists Prof. Baskin Oran of the Ankara University
and Associate Prof. Elcin Macar of the Yildiz Technical University,
are of the opinion that German parliament’s is a political call,
which bears no legal obligation for the Turkish Republic.
According to Turkish academics the main question here is: What does
it mean for the Turkish Republic to take historic responsibility for
the 1915 Armenian expulsion.
However Prof Bakir Caglar of Istanbul University is of the opinion
that `recognition of genocide’ would bring in its wake certain `legal
responsibilities’ for Turkey.
Facing the past
Recalling refusals and threats by the government directed at
academics who urge for an open discussion of the issue, Turkey has to
stop preventing public discussions on the Armenian problem, Macar,
told bianet.
“The state has to give up claiming that such a thing never happened,
embracing this as the official argument, and being a side in the
discussion,’ said Macar. `If you are for leaving the issue to
historians, then you should really leave it to historians. You can’t
prevent discussions.’
`Saying that `we have opened the archives’ means `let us look into
the truth because we don’t know the truth.’ But the Turkish state is
continuing to act as if it knows the truth,’ said Macar.
The German parliament has made the following calls on the German
government:
* The German government should help the Turkish Grand National
Assembly, the
Turkish government and the Turkish society to face its past,
* It should help set up a commission of Turkish and Armenian
historians,
* It should have the archives, which were sent from Germany to
Turkey,
opened to public,
* It should demand that the canceled Armenian conference takes place,
* It should contribute to the normalization of relations between
Turkey and
Armenia.
Oran: How can members of the `deep state’ in 1915 be defended?
Baskin Oran of Ankara University argues that the `individuals, not
institutions or states, are responsible for the genocide.’
Oran underlined the fact that the Turkish Republic is the state which
demolished the Ottoman Empire: `The Turkish Republic has not taken
upon itself anything of the Ottoman Empire, except for the `Duyun-u
Umumiye, the public debt owed by the Empire to individuals. And it
was normal for the Republic to take that debt upon itself. For,
otherwise it would have remained outside the international system.’
`I don’t understand why the Republic of Turkey, who has crushed the
Ottoman Empire, is now coming into the defense of the `Teskilati
Mahsusa’ (Special Forces) henchmen of the `deep state’ of 1915, and
the deep state itself,’ said Oran. `The Republic of Turkey has no
legal responsibility.’
Apologizing
According to Elcin Macar, Turks may apologize for the deportation of
Armenians in 1915 and express that this was a mistake of their
ancestors.
`If Turkey apologizes, it would be in the form of: `We apologize for
what our ancestors have done,” said Macar.
According to Oran however, the state must first apologize to the
Turkish public.
`If the Republic of Turkey is going to apologize, it should first
apologize to the Turkish public,’ said Oran. `For having masked the
issue for all these decades, for not discussing it, and for banning
the discussions.’
International law issues
According to Prof. Bakir Caglar of the Political Sciences Department
of Istanbul University, settling accounts with the past isn’t
something that can be done on one’s own. `This can only be possible
through means and groundwork of international law,’ said Caglar.
Caglar said in the face of increasing number of parliament decisions
across Europe the issue gains three dimensions in terms of
international law:
* The recognition of the genocide becoming a legal responsibility.
* The issue of insurance: The international companies that assumed
the insurances of Armenian property are still operational. The legal
procedure on the issue is continuing in the United States.
*Property in land: It is certain that real estate belonging to
Armenians were seized. This is a legal problem for Turkey. (TK)
BIA News Centre
21/06/2005

OSCE Washington meeting may adopt resolution on Armenian Genocide

OSCE Washington meeting may adopt resolution on Armenian Genocide
23.06.2005 11:32
YEREVAN (YERKIR) – Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe
(OSCE) Parliamentary Assembly, scheduled to hold its session in
Washington on July 1-5, may adopt a resolution related to the Armenian
Genocide, Armenpress reported, citing the Turkish news agency Anadolu.
Armenia has already launched lobbying efforts, according to the
Anadaolu, though no written proposal has yet been submitted. In case
the initiative is approved by the parliamentarians, nothing would
stand in the way of the Armenian delegation to reach its goal, the
news agency concludes.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Norwegian Speaker arriving in Armenia today

Pan Armenian News
NORWEGIAN SPEAKER ARRIVING IN ARMENIA TODAY
22.06.2005 03:59
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ A Norwegian delegation headed by Parliamentary Speaker
Jorgen Kosmo will pay a visit to Armenia June 22-24 on the invitation of
Chairman of the National Assembly of Armenia Artur Baghdassaryan. The
delegation will meet with A. Baghdassaryan, as well as the Vice-Speaker and
representatives of the standing commissions and factions of the Armenian
Parliament June 22. Besides, the Norwegian MPs will met with Armenian PM
Andranik Margarian and Deputy Minister of Defense Mikayel Harutyunian. June
23 the delegation will visit Holy Echmiadzin and the town of Spitak. June 24
a meeting with Armenian FM Vartan Oskanian is scheduled.

PM Replaces Deputy Minister of Labor and Social Affairs

ARMENIAN PRIME MINISTER REPLACES DEPUTY MINISTER OF LABOR AND SOCIAL
AFFAIRS
YEREVAN, JUNE 22. ARMINFO. Armenian Prime Minister replaces Deputy
Minister of Labor and Social Affairs Yeghishi Nazaretyan by Artsruni
Aghajanyan, the governmental press-service informs ARMINFO.
Biographical reference: A.Aghajanyan was born in 1955 in Artik, In
1979 he graduated from Yerevan State University, economist. In
1986-1999 – Director of Garment Factory of Horom, chief economist,
head of the financial-economic department, deputy director for
financial issues, a member of the Elders Council of Artik. In
1999-2003 – Deputy of Armenian Parliament, a member of the
parliamentary standing commissions for social affairs, for health and
ecology, as well as for financial and credit, budgetary and economic
affairs. In 2003 he was appointed Deputy Minister, worked as Deputy
Governor of Shirak region. He is a member of Orinats Yerkir party,
married, has four children.

Armenian Youth Research Officer in Full Swing

PRESS RELEASE
Diocese of the Armenian Church of Australia & New Zealand
10 Macquarie Street
Chatswood NSW 2067
AUSTRALIA
Contact: Laura Artinian
Tel: (02) 9419-8056
Fax: (02) 9904-8446
Email: [email protected]
21 June 2005
ARMENIAN YOUTH RESEARCH OFFICER IN FULL SWING
Sydney, Australia – The Armenian Community Welfare Centre (ACWC) that is
under the auspice of the Diocese of the Armenian Church of Australia and New
Zealand has assisted members of the Armenian Community of Sydney for more
than 22 years. The Centre generally caters for the needs of elderly
Armenian residents with Aged Day Care Programs, Dementia Day Care and Carer
Respite, Community Workers and English Classes.
Over the past 12 months, the ACWC has taken on a new initiative to consider
issues relating specifically to the needs of Armenian youth under the
direction of His Eminence Archbishop Aghan Baliozian, Primate of the Diocese
of the Armenian Church of Australia and New Zealand and President of the
ACWC. A research grant has been awarded by the NSW Community Relations
Commission for this project. Since April 2005, a Youth Research Officer has
embarked on the research project to identify and highlight the needs and
issues of Australian-Armenian youth. In this capacity, Mrs Ida Soghomonian,
a well-respected psychologist in the Armenian Community, is targeting
Armenian youth aged 12 to 21 years seeking their input through
questionnaires and youth forums on a number of issues. Mrs Soghomonian
plans to conduct her research with the co-operation of the various Armenian
schools as well as Armenian cultural and sporting groups aimed at youth.
The research project is due for completion by end 2005 with a final report
expected in February 2006.
Mrs Ida Soghomonian received her Masters in Psychology from Sydney
University and has 14 years experience in field counselling, psychotherapy,
drug/alcohol counselling, youth and family therapy. She has her own private
practice in psychology and has also been a school counsellor.
Positive contribution and support by the Armenian Community of Sydney will
be instrumental for the good outcome of this research paper. For further
information on the Armenian Youth Research Project, please contact Mrs Ida
Soghomonian at [email protected]
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

NK successfully concluded its fourth parliamentary elections

Permanent Mission of the Republic of Armenia
to the United Nations
119E 36th street, New York, NY 10016
Tel.: 1-212-686-9079
Fax: 1-212-686-3934
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:
June 20, 2005
PRESS RELEASE
Nagorno Karabagh successfully concluded its fourth parliamentary elections
On June 19, 2005, the fourth parliamentary elections were held in the
Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (NKR) since 1991, when the Republic declared
its independence from Azerbaijan on the basis of a referendum conducted
according to the norms of international law and the existing legislation of
the time. Previous elections to the NKR legislative body were held in 1995
and 2000. About 100 observers from the Czech Republic, Greece, Iran, Russia,
the United Kingdom, the United States and other nations monitored the June
19 parliamentary elections.
Elections in Nagorno Karabakh are held with the intent to secure the
self-governance of the population living within its territory and strengthen
the democratic institutions, which is encouraged by the international
community at large.
In 1992, at the Helsinki CSCE Council of Ministers, the document that
mandated the Minsk Process, referred specifically to Nagorno Karabakh as a
side to negotiations, represented by their elected authorities. The Summary
of Conclusions of the Additional Meeting of the Council of Ministers reads:
“Elected and other representatives of Nagorno-Karabakh will be invited to
the [Minsk] Conference as interested parties by the Chairman of the
Conference after consultations with the States participating at the
Conference.”
Law and order are not just desirable, but also necessary for Nagorno
Karabakh, even if its final status is still undetermined. Popularly elected
authorities become an important factor in the negotiation process and in
implementing whatever agreements may be reached through negotiations. They
are also an expression of the people’s right to self-determination.
The 2005 Parliamentary elections in Nagorno Karabagh were the first held
under a new Electoral Code, which introduced numerous improvements to the
procedures in force during previous presidential, parliamentary and local
elections. Of the nine political parties in Nagorno Karabakh, eight
nominated candidates. Six of the parties ran separate party tickets, and two
parties established a common party ticket for the campaign. Women
constituted 8.5 percent of nominated candidates. Over 70 percent of 89,576
registered voters took part in the elections, exceeding the 25 percent
minimum requirement. Seven parties and 185 candidates were vying for places
in Nagorno Karabakh’s fourth parliament, with two thirds of the parliament’s
33 seats to be elected directly and on third under a proportional system.
The Public International Law and Policy Group Delegation to the June 19,
2005 Nagorno Karabakh Parliamentary Elections issued its preliminary report
concluded: “Nagorno Karabakh has made demonstrable progress in building
democracy and its authorities have made serious effort to conduct the 2005
polls by democratic means. The new electoral code in particular seemed to
have helped unlock the political energies of the Karabakh people while at
the same time channeling these energies in democratic directions by
facilitating the establishment of political parties. Districts appear to be
established on the basis of technical considerations rather than political
considerations. While there remains room for further improvement, there is
reason too for optimism that the people of Nagorno Karabakh can consolidate
the democratic progress witnessed in the June 19 elections.”
As reported by the Public International Law and Policy Group Delegation,
“The general climate at the polling places seemed to be positive and
businesslike. There was no evidence of intimidation or any climate of fear
or uncertainty on the part of voters.” In addition, it noted: “Electoral law
changes introduced by the Central Election Commission opened up the
democratic space for political parties. Competition in that arena adhered to
generally accepted international electoral standards. In their totality, the
evolution of the voting system toward a more democratic process, the nature
of the electoral campaign, and the conduct of voters and officials on
election day are strong signs that Nagorno Karabakh has made significant
progress towards establishing a functioning and we hope sustainable
democracy… We salute the voters, candidates and in particular the Central
Election Commission for demonstrating a serious commitment toward
establishing a democratic system in Nagorno Karabakh and working within its
rules and procedures before and during the election. The election
environment was calm and we have not received any reports of general
intimidation.”
The Public International Law and Policy Group Delegation was composed of
members with a balance of experience in international election monitoring,
democracy building and regional expertise. James Hooper, who led the
American Independent Monitoring Delegation to the 2002 presidential
elections, served with the US Department of State for more than 25 years,
where he followed elections in the Balkans and has subsequently held senior
positions in several nongovernmental organizations. Aleyda Kasten served at
Georgetown University for 20 years as deputy director of the National
Security Studies Program, administrator/researcher of the Department of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and executive director of the Albert B.
Sabin Vaccine Institute. Vladimir Matic, professor of international
relations at Clemson University and consultant to research institutes,
observed several elections including the 2002 presidential election with the
American Independent Monitoring Delegation and was an assistant foreign
minister in the former Yugoslavia. Louis Sell, a career diplomat and
currently adjunct professor at the University of Maine at Farmington,
previously served in the Soviet Union and the former Yugoslavia and
participated in the 2002 presidential election with the American Independent
Monitoring Delegation. William Spencer, a career US diplomat for 14 years,
has organized and supported electoral processes in the Balkans and more
recently worked closely on human rights and democratization issues in
Afghanistan. Paul Williams, executive director and founder of the Public
International Law & Policy Group, has visited Nagorno Karabakh and is a
professor at American University’s School of International Service and
Washington College of Law.
End.

The many sightings of Noah’s Ark

The Calgary Herald (Alberta)
June 19, 2005 Sunday
Final Edition
The many sightings of Noah’s Ark
In the context of a new Noah’s Ark expedition to eastern Turkey,
Baptist Press News offers some sightings from Ron Stewart’s book,
Noah’s Ark:
A Scientific Look, Past And Future.
Among Stewart’s list of 100:
475 BCE — A Chaldean priest reports seeing the Ark’s remains at the
bottom of a mountain glacier.
30 BCE — Egyptian historian Hieronimus says the Ark’s remains can be
seen on Mt. Ararat.
50 CE — Nicholas of Damascus and Flavius Josephus both report the
Ark’s remains are preserved in their time.
560 — St. Isadore reports seeing the wood of the Ark on Mt. Ararat.
620 — After conquering Armenia, Byzantine Emperor Heraclius
reportedly climbs Ararat and sees the Ark.
1269 — Explorer Marco Polo reports seeing the Ark after a three-day
climb in “the snowy reaches” — at the bottom of the summit, not its
peak.
1647 — Explorer Adam Olerius reports seeing its petrified remains.
1829 — Frederick Parrot reports Ark relics in a church at Ararat’s
base, later destroyed in an 1840 earthquake.
1832-1850 — Expeditions from Russia, Turkey and England fail to find
it.
1856 — Two British scientists climb Ararat to disprove the Ark, but
report a “chest-like” shape of petrified wood at 15,000 feet on
Ararat’s northeast side.
1887 — Indian explorer John Nouri locates the Ark and recommends
recovering it for the 1900 World’s Fair.
1917 — Ark photos and measurements are taken by a Russian
expedition, but lost when the czar topples.
1945 — A Turkish pilot claims to have photographed the Ark.
1949 — Aerial photos show a formation resembling a ship with
dimensions fitting the Bible story.
1990 — Laser enhancement of satellite photo reportedly shows a
boxlike shape, broken in half.

Tensions germano-turques =?UNKNOWN?Q?apr=E8s?= une=?UNKNOWN?Q?r=E9so

Agence France Presse
17 juin 2005 vendredi 4:56 PM GMT
Tensions germano-turques après une résolution sur les “massacres” en
Arménie
BERLIN 17 juin 2005
L’adoption jeudi par la chambre des députés allemands d’une
résolution sur les massacres commis par la Turquie entre 1915 et 1917
contre le peuple arménien a suscité vendredi des tensions entre
Ankara et Berlin, l’Allemagne jugeant la déception de la Turquie
“incompréhensible”.
A Ankara, le Premier ministre turc Recep Tayyip Erdogan s’en est
ouvertement pris vendredi au chancelier allemand Gerhard Schröder
pour n’avoir pas usé de son influence afin de bloquer l’adoption du
texte.
“Il est politiquement faux et qui plus est, il n’est pas beau, que le
parlement allemand ait sacrifié la question sans débat au lobbying
arménien”, a ajouté M. Erdogan.
De son côté, le gouvernement allemand a estimé vendredi que le texte
était “équilibré”. Interrogé par le quotidien Der Tagesspiegel à
paraître samedi, le porte-parole adjoint du gouvernement Thomas Steg
a jugé “incompréhensible la déception à propos de cette résolution”,
précisant que le chancelier Gerhard Schröder avait toujours pris soin
“de dire clairement sa propre position à ce sujet”.
Précisément les Allemands savent que la reconnaissance des erreurs
passées et la volonté de réconciliation étaient essentielles “pour
donner un avenir pacifique aux relations entre les peuples”, a
précisé M. Steg.
Jeudi, le ministre des Affaires étrangères turc Abdullah Gül avait
déjà critiqué cette résolution qu’il a jugée “blessante” à l’égard de
la Turquie et des Turcs vivant en Allemagne, soit près de 2,5
millions de personnes. Et le numéro deux de l’ambassade d’Allemagne
en Turquie avait été convoqué au ministère des Affaires étrangères.
Le texte qui ne mentionne pas explicitement le terme de “génocide”, a
été adopté par l’ensemble des fractions parlementaires et demande au
gouvernement allemand de “s’engager pour faire respecter la liberté
d’opinion en Turquie, en particulier en ce qui concerne les massacres
commis à l’égard des Arméniens”.
“Un arrangement doit être trouvé entre Turcs et Arméniens par la
réconciliation et le pardon pour la responsabilité historique”
turque, ajoute la résolution, approuvée par les groupes
parlementaires social-démocrate (SPD), conservateurs (CDU-CSU), Vert
et libéral (FDP).
Les parlementaires allemands demandent aussi à Berlin d’oeuvrer à ce
que “la Turquie normalise immédiatement ses relations bilatérales
avec l’Arménie”.
La Turquie a reconnu l’Arménie à son indépendance en 1991 mais sans
établir de relations diplomatiques en raison du profond différend sur
les massacres considérés comme un génocide par de nombreux pays.
Les massacres et déportations d’Arméniens perpétrés sous l’Empire
ottoman, de 1915 à 1917, ont fait 1,5 million de morts selon les
Arméniens, entre 250.000 et 500.000 selon Ankara qui rejette
catégoriquement la thèse du génocide.
Le “génocide” arménien a été reconnu en 1985 par la sous-commission
des droits de l’Homme de l’ONU, puis en 1987 par le Parlement
européen, et également par plusieurs pays européens, dont la France,
où vit la plus grosse communauté arménienne d’Europe, avec 350.000
personnes.
–Boundary_(ID_DKdQjMwJJMjCAsA15OZ0iA)–