EU Parliament Says Turkey Must Recognize “Genocide”

EU PARLIAMENT SAYS TURKEY MUST RECOGNIZE “GENOCIDE”

Tehran Times
Sept 29 2005

STRASBOURG, France – The European Parliament said on Wednesday that
Turkey must recognize the killing of Armenians under Ottoman rule in
1915 as genocide as a pre-requisite for joining the European Union.

The EU legislature also postponed a vote on Turkey’s extended customs
union with the EU in a potential last-minute snag for Ankara’s EU
entry talks, due to start next Monday.

The non-binding resolution on the Armenian issue is likely to anger
Turkey, which insists that the killings of Armenians were not a
systematic genocide.

EU talks on Turkey threatened by disputes

EU talks on Turkey threatened by disputes
By Dan Bilefsky

International Herald Tribune

THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2005

ISTANBUL Just days before European leaders gather to decide whether to begin
talks with Turkey about its entering the European Union, Austrian resistance
to Turkey and unresolved disputes over Armenia and Cyprus risk derailing
negotiations.

As representatives from EU governments prepared to meet in Brussels on
Thursday to decide on a framework for negotiations with Turkey, people close
to the talks said that Austria remained determined to push for a “privileged
partnership” with Turkey that falls short of full membership. They said this
opposition could result in an emergency meeting of foreign ministers on
Sunday to try to salvage negotiations.

“Of course, we are hoping that talks will begin Monday as scheduled, but
right now tempers are high, Austria refuses to budge and the outcome is not
at all a done deal,” said a British official close to the talks. Under EU
rules, a decision to start talks must be unanimous.

The European Parliament gave grudging approval to the opening of talks
Monday, but it also said that Turkey must recognize the killing of Armenians
under Ottoman rule in 1915 as genocide or risk being left out of the EU. The
nonbinding resolution is largely symbolic, but it was met with a frosty
response in Ankara, which insists there was no genocide and is adamant that
no further conditions be attached to Turkey’s EU bid.

The European Parliament, meeting in Strasbourg, also postponed a vote that
was to have taken place Wednesday, to approve Turkey’s extended customs
union with the EU. Ankara has agreed to extend its free trade agreement with
the EU to all 25 member states, including Cyprus. But it refuses to
recognize Cyprus formally and denies Cyprus access to its airfields and
ports. In a heated debate, members of Parliament said this was unacceptable.

“Turkey has to recognize members of a club if it wants to join it,” said Jan
Marinus Wiersma, vice president of the Parliament’s influential Socialist
group.

The Turkish Cypriot leader, Mehmet Ali Talat, warned Wednesday that forcing
Turkey to recognize Cyprus before the island’s division was resolved could
destroy prospects for peace and lead to civil war. Cyprus has been divided
since 1974 into a Greek-Cypriot controlled south and a Turkish-occupied
north.

In Ankara, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey publicly dismissed
the European Parliament’s statements. But people close to the prime minister
said he had been stung by them and had momentarily considered boycotting the
talks. Erdogan has reiterated forcefully over the past few weeks that he
would walk away from the talks if Turkey were offered anything less than
full membership.

Turkish analysts said Turkish public opinion was growing increasingly
frustrated with the EU’s stance and Erdogan could not afford a deal deemed
humiliating by many Turks. “Erdogan will not agree to talks if Turkey is
forced to make more sacrifices,” said Selcuk Gutalesi, a commentator for
Zaman, a conservative newspaper close to the government. Already, Turkey has
accepted unprecedented conditions to open EU negotiations, including an
open-ended halt to the movement of Turkish workers into the bloc.

While the EU’s invitation to Turkey last December was greeted with euphoria
in Turkey, the anti-Turkey sentiment expressed in recent votes on the EU
constitution in France and the Netherlands has prompted some Turkish
newspapers to splash headlines on their front pages accusing the EU of
double standards and calling on it to obey its own high moral laws. Turkish
officials say they fear the EU will try Monday to impose even tougher
conditions on Turkey’s EU entry to placate its own skeptical citizens.

The idea of accepting a poor, agrarian country into the bloc has been met
with deep resistance across the EU. Recent polls show a majority of French,
German and Austrian voters oppose admitting Turkey, and a majority of Danes
would rather see non-EU candidate, Ukraine, in the EU than an “Islamic
country” like Turkey.

That skepticism is likely to intensify in coming years, because leaders
viscerally opposed to Turkey’s entry are on the rise in two of the EU’s most
important countries, Germany and France. The Christian Democrat leader,
Angela Merkel, who may lead a German coalition government after finishing
ahead of the party in power in this month’s elections, favors a “privileged
partnership” for Turkey. In France, a likely presidential candidate, Nicolas
Sarkozy, also opposes Turkish membership.

Sinan Ulgen, a political analyst at Istanbul Economics, an Istanbul research
institution and consultancy, said Turkey was bracing itself for a long road
ahead. “The talks are likely to last at least 10 years, so this is only the
beginning.”

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/09/28/news/union.php

Sibel Edmonds v. Department of Justice: A Patriot Silenced

;c =317

Sibel Edmonds v. Department of Justice: A Patriot Silenced, Fighting to Keep
America Safe

September 26, 2005

FOR IMMEDIATE RLEASE
CONTACT: [email protected]

By ACLU Associate Legal Director Ann Beeson

WASHINGTON — The American Civil Liberties Union is urging the U.S. Supreme
Court to review a lower court’s dismissal of the case of Sibel Edmonds, a
former FBI translator who was fired in retaliation for reporting security
breaches and possible espionage within the Bureau. Lower courts dismissed
the case when former Attorney General John Ashcroft invoked the rarely used
“state secrets” privilege.

Sibel Edmonds, a Turkish-American woman, was hired as a translator by the
FBI shortly after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 because of her
knowledge of Middle Eastern languages. Judge Reggie Walton in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed Edmonds retaliation
case, citing the government’s `states secrets privilege.’ The D.C. Circuit
Court of Appeals upheld that ruling, and on August 4, 2005, the American
Civil Liberties Union petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Edmonds’
case.

The Supreme Court created the so-called state secrets privilege more than 50
years ago but has not considered it since. The privilege, when properly
invoked, permits the government to block the release in litigation of any
material that, if disclosed, would cause harm to national security. The need
for clarification of the doctrine is acute because the government is
increasingly using the privilege to cover up its own wrongdoing and to keep
legitimate cases out of court.

History has shown that the government has relied on the state secrets
privilege to cover up its own negligence. In the 1953 Supreme Court case
that was the basis for today’s state secrets privilege doctrine, United
States v. Reynolds , the government claimed that disclosing a military
flight accident report would jeopardize secret military equipment and harm
national security. Nearly 50 years later, in 2004, the truth came out – the
accident report contained no state secrets, but instead confirmed that the
cause of the crash was faulty maintenance of the B-29 fleet.

The government is engaged in a similar cover-up in the Edmonds case. In
2002, at the request of Senate Judiciary Committee members Charles Grassley
(R-IA) and Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the FBI provided several unclassified
briefings to Members of Congress in which it confirmed many of Edmonds’
allegations.

More than two years later, the Justice Department retroactively classified
those briefings, which were reported in the Congressional Record, and asked
Members who had the information posted on their web sites to remove certain
documents. This move was a blatant attempt to bolster the government’s
efforts to dismiss Edmonds’ case on state secrets grounds. After the Project
On Government Oversight filed a separate lawsuit challenging the retroactive
classification, the Justice Department agreed the information could be
distributed.

An unclassified summary of a report by the DOJ’s Inspector General, released
in January 2005, corroborates Edmonds’ allegations . The IG report concludes
that the FBI had retaliated against Edmonds for reporting serious security
breaches, stating that `many of her allegations were supported, that the FBI
did not take them seriously enough, and that her allegations were, in fact,
the most significant factor in the FBI’s decision to terminate her
services.’

Edmonds’ case is not an isolated incident. The federal government is
routinely retaliating against government employees who uncover weaknesses in
our ability to prevent terrorist attacks or protect public safety.

The states secrets privilege should be used as a shield for sensitive
evidence, not a sword the government can use at will to cut off argument in
a case before the evidence can be presented. We are urging the Supreme
Court, which has not directly addressed this issue in 50 years, to rein in
the government’s misuse of this privilege.

The outcome in Edmonds’ case could significantly impact the government’s
ability to rely on secrecy to avoid accountability in future cases,
including one pending case charging the government with `rendering’
detainees to be tortured.

We are asking the Supreme Court to reverse the D.C. appeals court’s decision
to exclude the press and public from the court hearing of Edmonds’ case last
April. The appeals court closed the hearing at the eleventh hour without any
specific findings that secrecy was necessary.

Fourteen 9/11 family member advocacy groups and public interest
organizations filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of Edmonds case
before the District Court, and many are expected to join an amicus brief
supporting Supreme Court review of the case, including the National Security
Archive.

Edmonds’ ordeal is highlighted in a 10-page article in the September 2005
issue of Vanity Fair titled `An Inconvenient Patriot.’ The article, which
chronicles FBI wrongdoing and possible corruption charges involving a
high-level member of Congress, further undercuts the government’s claim that
the case can’t be litigated because certain information is secret.

http://www.aclu.org/court/court.cfm?ID=19163&amp

Ontario Students First In West To Be Taught Details Of WartimeAtroci

ONTARIO STUDENTS FIRST IN WEST TO BE TAUGHT DETAILS OF WARTIME ATROCITIES IN ASIA
By David Giddens CBCUnlocked

CBCUnlocked, Canada
Sept 26 2005

“See that?” John Stroud, Canadian Hong Kong War veteran, is pointing
a bony finger at a black-and-white picture taken 60 years ago of a
gaunt young man. “That’s me. In the Japanese slave camps.” He turns
to his audience of students, teachers and media in Toronto’s Jarvis
Collegiate auditorium. “I weighed 182 pounds when I was captured. I
was 62 pounds when I got out.”

“What we taught in the past was incomplete,” says Sarah Giddens,
history teacher and contributor to the successful effort to make
Ontario the first jurisdiction in the Western world to include a
section of history about the Second World War in Asia. “Most students,
most teachers, are shocked to learn the facts about this period and
place in history.”

Ontario’s new Grade 10 curriculum now includes specific examples of
such war atrocities as those suffered by Stroud and other prisoners
of war. They also include information on the 1937 Nanjing Massacre,
during which hundreds of thousands of Chinese were killed during
a six-week spree by Japanese troops, and the abuse of the “Comfort
Women,” Asian women forced into prostitution by the troops during
the war. Wartime history, including those incidents, is still the
subject of angry debate today between Japan and other Asian nations
including China and Korea.

Ontario’s Ministry of Education takes the position that the province
has a duty to train students to form broader perspectives on history.

Case in point: many, perhaps most, Canadians have been taught the
global conflict began in 1939 with the invasion of Poland, while many
Americans might argue the war really began at Pearl Harbor in 1941.

But for millions of Asians, the Second World War began a decade
earlier, when Japan invaded Manchuria in 1931. And that shift in
perspective is the entire point behind the new course material: The
Search for Global Citizenship: The Violation of Human Rights in Asia,
1931-1945.”

The project is due in very large part to the efforts of
Chinese-Canadian philanthropist Dr. Joseph Wong. Eight years ago,
he was instrumental in forming ALPHA, The Association for Learning &
Preserving the History of WWII in Asia-Toronto, because “very few
people in the world know about the truth. ALPHA is here to make sure
that justice finally prevails for those 35 million souls who perished
during the war in Asia.”

“I draw a parallel: postwar Germany made it a crime to deny the
Holocaust, and compensated victims of the Second World War, and truly
expressed remorse in making sure that all German children will learn
the truth about the war, but look at the aggressor Japanese nation
today. They still try to hide facts of the war. They still want to
change history in the textbooks, so that Japanese children are denied
the right to know about what happened during that particular dark
chapter of history.”

The Japanese government vehemently denies this assessment of history
and says its peacetime record since the war proves it is not an
aggressor nation. However the issue continues to sour relations
between China and Japan. Changes to Japanese textbooks this spring
led to a tense standoff between China and Japan, with Chinese crowds
attacking Japanese businesses in Beijing and other cities.

Every secondary school in Ontario now has documents, videos and web
information to support the revised curriculum. The foreword is by
Canadian journalist, author and social activist June Callwood: “If
world peace ever happens it will be built on knowledge. Young people
cannot understand the importance of defending existing protections of
human life and dignity without knowing that the wall between decency
and depravity is paper thin.”

The goal is not to isolate atrocities committed by the Japanese
Imperial Army, but to help students understand these events in the
same way they understand other crimes against humanity, such as the
Jewish Holocaust, the Armenian massacre or the Rwandan genocide. It
is not about vilifying Japan, but about enlightening a new generation
of students and leaders to the fact that humanity, in all parts of
the globe, has a history of committing human rights abuses.

Maria Y.M. Yau, project co-ordinator with the Toronto District school
board, admits that, within the Japanese community, this remains
controversial material, but adds, “As a global citizen, this is
not controversial. It is a history we should share with our younger
students … as citizens we are all entitled to know these facts.”

Yau’s regret is that recent history is still susceptible to political
manoeuvring. Among some in the Chinese communities, some of this
history is still viewed with skepticism, because students from China
have learned to distrust much of what they were taught under the
propaganda-laden Communist regime.

Linda Mowatt – president of the Ontario History, Humanities and
Social Sciences Teachers’ Association – says that distrust is part of
the reason the new curriculum is so useful: “This is history being
revealed in the time that students are learning it …. They are
getting critical skills about the act of revealing history. Students
are learning that the truth emerges slowly and methodically.”

Jack Fu, a Grade 11 student at Jarvis, had previously taken five
years of history in China. Upon moving to Canada, he says, “I was
surprised to not learn this in history classes here. I find a lot of
similarities between Nanjing and the Jewish Holocaust.”

Jasmine Li, now in Grade 12, says, “When I took Grade 10 history, I
learned about Europe … events in Germany and Austria and so forth,
but it is really important that people know what happened in the
whole world. Not just part of it.”

For his part, Dr. Wong is optimistic about the eventual impact of the
new course: “I see this as a step toward the closure of the Second
World War in Asia.”

http://www.cbcunlocked.com/artman/publish/features/article_449.shtml

Armenian president, visiting US businessman discuss joint plans

Public Television of Armenia, Yerevan, in Armenian
22 Sep 05

ARMENIAN PRESIDENT, VISITING US BUSINESSMAN DISCUSS JOINT PLANS

Huntsman Corporation plans to implement programmes in Armenia in the
spheres of education and health, well-known US businessman John
Huntsman said at a meeting with Armenian President Robert Kocharyan
in Yerevan today. The Armenian president said that the government
will help Huntsman to implement the programmes.

Robert Kocharyan noted that the Armenian people are grateful to
Huntsman, who had offered help after the devastating earthquake of
1988.

This time Huntsman came to Yerevan with the owners of the Sharp and
Associates, Reud, Morgan and Queen companies.

[Video showed the meeting]

RA & AR FMs to discuss details of negotiations on NK conflict

ARKA News Agency
Sept 22 2005

THE RA AND AR MINISTERS OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS THINK TO DISCUSS THE
DETAILS OF THE NEGOTIATIONS ON NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT

YEREVAN, September 22. /ARKA/. The RA and AR Ministers of Foreign
Affairs Vartan Oskanian and Elmar Mamediarov are going to hold a
bilateral meeting to discuss the further details of the negotiations
on Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and the continuation of the work for the
search of the ways for peaceful settlement of the conflict, according
to the RA Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Arman Kirakosyan. At
that, he noted that there is no certain agreement on the place and
date for holding the negotiations. A.H. –0–

Turkish Court Orders Cancellation Of Academic Conference On Armenian

TURKISH COURT ORDERS CANCELLATION OF ACADEMIC CONFERENCE ON ARMENIAN MASSACRE
By Benjamin Harvey

The Associated Press
09/22/05 13:45 EDT

ISTANBUL, Turkey (AP) – An Istanbul court on Thursday ordered the
cancellation of an academic conference on the massacre of Armenians
during the Ottoman Empire, casting greater doubt on whether Turkey
is prepared to accept open discussion of controversial subjects.

The conference was originally scheduled for May but was postponed
after Justice Minister Cemil Cicek severely criticized it, saying it
went against government efforts to counter an Armenian campaign to
have the killings recognized as genocide.

The case to close the conference was brought by the Turkish Lawyers
Union and other lawyers.

The conference was scheduled to deal with one of the most sensitive
issues in Turkish politics – the killings of Armenians during
the collapse of the Ottoman Empire around the time of World War I,
which an increasing number of governments have officially recognized
as genocide.

Turkey says the killings took place during civil unrest and backing
the genocide claim in Turkey can be a cause for prosecution.

There was no immediate word from court officials on why the conference
was canceled.

The Anatolia news agency reported that the court said the hosts could
appeal, but demanded a number of documents including the academic
backgrounds of the participants, proof that invitees were of varying
viewpoints and documents listing the financial backers of the speakers.

Turkey came under international scrutiny after the original conference
was postponed, with some critics saying it showed Turkey would not
allow freedom of expression on sensitive subjects.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan immediately condemned the court’s
decision Thursday. Courts are independent in Turkey, however, and
the prime minister has little power to overturn their decisions.

Last month, Turkey opened a case against one of the country’s most
acclaimed contemporary writers, novelist Orhan Pamuk. Pamuk, who is
often mentioned as a candidate for the Nobel Prize in literature,
is scheduled to go before a Turkish court in December for the crime
of insulting the Turkish national identity. His offending comment was
made to a Swiss newspaper in regard to Turkey’s killings of Armenians
and Kurds.

European Union officials have said they will be watching the Pamuk
trial very closely, and some have suggested that Turkey’s refusal
to permit free expression could be a cause for halting EU membership
negotiations, which are to begin Oct. 3.

Russian elec. giant close to completing Armenian power grid purchase

Eurasia Daily Monitor, DC
The Jamestown Foundation
Sept 21 2005

RUSSIAN ELECTRICITY GIANT CLOSE TO COMPLETING ARMENIAN POWER GRID
PURCHASE

By Emil Danielyan

Wednesday, September 21, 2005

Russia’s state-run power monopoly, Unified Energy Systems (UES), is
close to formalizing its effective purchase of Armenia’s electricity
grid, giving Moscow near total control over the Armenian energy
sector. The government in Yerevan indicated on September 15 that it
would green light a deal that has generated serious concern among
Armenia’s leading Western donors. The latter have for years opposed
Russian attempts to take over the Electricity Networks of Armenia
(ENA) but now appear to have come to terms with the change of
ownership.

UES has already been the de facto owner of ENA since announcing last
June a $73 million “management contract” with Midland Resources
Holding, a British-registered company that controversially privatized
ENA three years ago. UES initially claimed to have purchased the
Armenian utility, but later clarified that it paid the lump sum only
for the right to run ENA and use its profits. The Russians argued
that the deal therefore falls short of a formal acquisition, which
has to be approved by the Armenian authorities.

But it was obvious that Midland Resources now owns ENA only on paper.
The Armenian government remained suspiciously silent on the issue
until facing strong criticism from the World Bank and the U.S.
government’s Agency for International Development (USAID). The two
institutions, which have invested heavily in the decade-long reform
of the Armenian energy sector, warned that the lack of transparency
could force them to reconsider their further assistance to the
country.

Armenia’s Public Service Regulatory Commission, a supposedly
independent body, claimed to have investigated the legality of the
deal and found no evidence of wrongdoing. It argued in late August
that Midland did not have to seek government approval because it
remains the legal owner of ENA. However, the authorities apparently
concluded that having the Russians follow all legal rules and
formally buy the network would spare them greater trouble. The
calculation seems to have proved correct.

On September 8, Midland Resources submitted letters to the government
and the Regulatory Commission asking for permission to sell ENA
shares to an obscure UES subsidiary called Interenergo BV. The
Armenian cabinet granted the request in principle at a meeting on
September 15, which was chaired by President Robert Kocharian. A
government statement said the Energy Ministry was given three days to
clarify all details of the Russian takeover, notably “some issues
relating to obligations” of the new owner. The deal’s clearance now
seems a forgone conclusion.

Western donor agencies and governments are evidently resigned to this
development. The head of the World Bank office in Yerevan, Roger
Robinson, welcomed on September 13 the fact that the process is now
proceeding “in compliance with the law of Armenia.” “I am personally
pleased to see what I think are the rules now being followed,”
Robinson told journalists. “That’s what we asked everybody to do
anyway and that is exactly what has happened,” he added.

Yet the result of all this will be the tightening of Russia’s grip on
the Armenian energy sector. UES alone controls several big power
plants that account for 80% of Armenia’s electricity output. Armenian
Energy Minister Armen Movsisian publicly spoke out against the
Russian giant’s ownership of ENA last March, arguing that it would
run counter to a key goal of the energy sector reform: separation of
units generating, transmitting, and distributing electricity. The
structural change helped Armenia to end its crippling power shortages
of the 1990s and start exporting electricity to neighboring Georgia
and Iran.

But Robinson believes that there is nothing wrong with a single
company producing and distributing energy, saying that this is a
normal practice in Western countries like France. The important
thing, said the World Bank official, is not so much who owns the
power distribution networks as the existence of an independent state
regulator. “We have great confidence in the regulator here in
Armenia,” he said.

The Public Service Regulatory Commission (PSRC) was also praised by
USAID. “A transparent and robust decision-making process, managed by
a strong regulator, is key to protecting the interests of energy
consumers,” USAID said in a statement. “USAID is happy to continue
assistance to the PSRC and others to ensure the design and
implementation of such a process.”

However, the head of PSRC, Yerevan’s former presidentially appointed
mayor, Robert Nazarian, is known for anything but independence and
respect of law. In his capacity as Yerevan mayor, Nazarian had
personally sanctioned (usually at the orders of top Kocharian aides)
massive land allocations in the city center to businesses owned by
senior government officials and their cronies. Local investigative
journalists say the process contained enough material for writing a
textbook on government corruption in Armenia.

The Western donor agencies should be aware of this, but are clearly
unwilling or unable to stop UES expanding its presence in Armenia.
The Armenian and Russian governments may have well decided that
expansion. Observers note the fact that Movsisian voiced his
objections shortly before Russian President Vladimir Putin’s last
visit to Yerevan. Russian-Armenian cooperation on energy was
reportedly high on the agenda of Putin’s talks with Kocharian.

(Haykakan Zhamanak, September 16; Armenian government statement,
September 15; USAID statement, September 15; RFE/RL Armenia Report,
September 13)

Tehran’s ambassador to Ireland is arrested

RTE Interactive, Ireland
Sept 21 2005
X-Sender: Asbed Bedrossian <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 — ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Tehran’s ambassador to Ireland is arrested

21 September 2005 14:17
Tehran’s ambassador to Ireland has been arrested in Iran on charges
of financial mismanagement, according to Iranian judicial and foreign
ministry sources.

Judiciary Minister Jamal Karimirad told reporters on Monday an
Iranian envoy had been arrested and was in jail after failing to meet
bail.

Foreign Ministry sources today named the man as Hamid Reza Nikkar,
ambassador to Ireland. There was no indication of how Nikkar pleaded.

‘One of our ambassadors has been arrested for financial
mismanagement,’ Karimirad said on Monday. ‘Ten percent of a
16million deal has been mismanaged,’ he added.

It was unclear whether the charge, which one source said involved a
construction project, related to a crime committed in Iran or abroad.

Nikkar took up his posting in Dublin in June and foreign ministry
sources said the charges were likely to relate to an alleged offence
before his arrival in Ireland.

Press reports at the time of Nikkar’s appointment said he had served
as ambassador to Armenia and mayor of the central city of Isfahan
before taking up his Dublin post.

The Irish ambassador in Tehran declined to comment on the case.

ANKARA: Zurich Prosecutor Started Investigation Against Perincek

Anatolian Times, Turkey
Sept 20 2005

Zurich Prosecutor Started Investigation Against Perincek

LAUSANNE – Labor Party (IP) leader Dogu Perincek gave evidence today
(Tuesday) to Lausanne Prosecutor regarding his statements about the
so-called Armenian genocide.
Perincek spoke to A.A. correspondent after his testimony in the
prosecutor’s office.

During interrogation, Perincek said the concept of genocide covered
under Swiss laws was irrelevant with the Turkish-Armenian problem.

Perincek said, ”I have told the prosecutor that such kind of
interrogations harmed friendship between Turkey and Switzerland,
which is a country of peace. I said allegations of so-called Armenian
genocide were unjust, and that this led to the humiliation of Turkish
nation in the international community. Those allegations also
contributed to the formation of a racist public opinion against
Turks.”

Perincek said the prosecutor stepped back during the interrogation
and said, ”we don’t have the authority to judge Turkish history. We
will not decide here whether Turks committed genocide. What we
examine is whether Perincek committed racism, discrimination and/or
humiliated peoples in his statements.”

-FOUR INVESTIGATIONS-

Meanwhile, Zurich Prosecutor’s Office started an investigation
following the press conference of Perincek in Zurich yesterday
(Monday).

At the conference, Perincek called on Swiss authorities to make a
serious investigation about the Armenian issue. He said it was unjust
to affirm that a nation ”committed genocide” without thoroughly
examining the events that had happened 90 years ago.

It was reported that investigations started by prosecutors of
Winterthur, Lausanne, Bern and Zurich would be combined in a single
file.

In July, Perincek was interrogated as he said that the so-called
Armenian genocide had never been happened. Lausanne Prosecutor called
on Perincek to come to his office on September 20th, to interrogate
him for a second time.

Perincek earlier had been detained in Winterthur city of Switzerland
as he said, ”Armenian genocide is nothing but an international lie”
at a news conference, but he was released after being interrogated.

A legal procedure was also opened in Switzerland against Prof. Dr.
Yusuf Halacoglu, the Chairman of the Turkish Historical Society,
because of his statement refuting the so-called Armenian genocide
allegations.