Prosperous Armenia MP – Concessions Possible In Karabakh After Statu

PROSPEROUS ARMENIA MP – CONCESSIONS POSSIBLE IN KARABAKH AFTER STATUS DEFINED
Arman Gharibyan

2010 /03/24 | 14:17

politics

Prosperous Armenia Party (PAP) MP Naira Zohrabyan told Hetq
today that the party was fully behind President Serzh Sargsyan’s
recent statement in Syria that Armenia would be willing to make
territorial concessions in Karabakh if the people of the NKR were
afforded the right to exercise self-determination."The position
of Prosperous Armenia has always been clear. We are always open to
discuss concessions in Karabakh once the status of the NKR has been
determined, when the people of the NKR will be afforded avenues to
exercise self-determination," said the MP.

MP Zohrabyan said that this position of the PAP was not in conflict
with President Sargsyan’s position given in an interview to "Al-Watan",
a Syrian newspaper the other day.

The PAP MP said that President Sargsyan made it clear in Syria that
the underlying causes of the Karabakh conflict must be resolved and
this necessitates self-determination for the people of the NKR.

"Afterwards, MP Zohrabyan said, discussions as to concessions can
be discussed. Naturally, any resolution entails concessions on both
sides. There can be no unilateral concessions," she said

http://hetq.am/en/politics/bhk-11/

Turkey Unwilling To Discuss Its Crimes, CE Commissioner For Human Ri

TURKEY UNWILLING TO DISCUSS ITS CRIMES, CE COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS

news.am
March 23 2010
Armenia

Historical controversies should not hold human rights
hostage. One-sided interpretations or distortions of historical events
have sometimes led to discrimination of minorities, xenophobia and
renewal of conflict. It is crucial to establish an honest search for
the truth" said Thomas Hammarberg, Council of Europe Commissioner
for Human Rights, in his latest Viewpoint published on March 22.

Atrocities in the past must be recognized, documented and learned
from — but not distorted or misused for political purposes.

Gross human rights violations in the past continue to affect relations
in today’s Europe. In some cases the right lessons have been learned;
genuine knowledge of history has facilitated understanding, tolerance
and trust between individuals and peoples. However, some serious
atrocities are denied or trivialised, which has created new tensions.

There are also cases where violations in the past have been exploited
in chauvinistic propaganda, causing division and hatred. Bogus
interpretations of history have in fact been used to justify
discrimination, racism, anti-Semitism and xenophobia.

"Coming to terms with history is always essential, but particularly
crucial in cases of massive atrocities and human rights violations.

Such crimes cannot be ignored without severe consequences. Prolonged
impunity or lack of acknowledgment over several generations tends
to create bitterness among those who identify themselves with the
victims. This, in turn, can poison relations between people who
were not even born when the events in question took place," said
the Commissioner.

He also states that "even more controversial has been — and is —
the very description of the enforced mass displacement, the ensuing
deaths as well as the outright killings of ethnic Armenians in 1915
under the Ottoman Empire. Even though this happened before the creation
of the new Turkish republic, there has been unwillingness there to
discuss these crimes. Writers and journalists who raised the issue
were brought to trial. Now, the first steps towards recognizing the
facts have at long last been taken — through academic discussions —
but more needs to be done."

What is important is an honest search for the truth and a sober,
facts-based discussion about the different versions. Only then can
the right lessons be learned, said Hammarberg.

Enhanced Food Security In The Focus Of Armenian Authorities

ENHANCED FOOD SECURITY IN THE FOCUS OF ARMENIAN AUTHORITIES

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
23.03.2010 15:31 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Enhanced food security is in the focus of the
Armenian authorities, said Gagik Minasyan, chairman of the RA NA
Standing Committee on Financial, Credit and Budgetary Affairs.

"The authorities will pay a particular attention to the preservation
and renovation of food reserves, special attention will be paid to
promoting the local agriculture. Along with the economic growth
appropriate mechanisms to stimulate local production need to be
developed," he told a news conference in Yerevan on Tuesday.

Mr. Minasyan reminded, that the state subsidizes agriculture (30 000
drams / per 1 hectare of land).

He also informed that regional security problems were discussed at
the 34th session of the Economic, Commercial, Technological and
Environmental Affairs Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of
Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) in Chisinau on March 17. "The
meeting specified the definition of the poverty limits, which in
Armenia exceeded 3 per cent, and this is a new challenge for the
Armenian government," he said.

On 25 June 1992, the Heads of State and Government of eleven countries
signed in Istanbul the Summit Declaration and the Bosporus Statement
giving birth to the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC). It came into
existence as a model of multilateral political and economic initiative
aimed at fostering interaction and harmony among the Member States,
as well as to ensure peace, stability and prosperity encouraging
friendly and good-neighborly relations in the Black Sea region. The
BSEC Headquarters – the Permanent International Secretariat of the
Organization of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC PERMIS) –
was established in March 1994 in Istanbul. With the entry into force
of its Charter on 1 May 1999, BSEC acquired international legal
identity and was transformed into a full-fledged regional economic
organization: Organization of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation. With
the accession of Serbia (then Serbia and Montenegro) in April 2004,
the Organization’s Member States increased to twelve.

No You Can’t

NO YOU CAN’T
By Raffi K. Hovannisian

Lragir.am
22/03/10

OBAMA’S TEST AND TURKEY’S TIME

Yerevan-A couple of sentences in a non-binding resolution, passed
by the House of Representatives foreign affairs committee on March
4, softly reaffirming the genocide of the Armenian people and the
forcible dispossession of their homeland has got Turkey threatening
the world, the US administration complicitly trying to hush Congress
by blocking a vote on the floor, and many Armenians celebrating a rare
moment against the odds. The Swedish parliament’s March 11 decision
to recognize and then its prime minister’s extraterrestrial apology
to Turkey have only raised the stakes.

But there is nothing to celebrate.

The Armenian people lost more than a million souls and their ancient
patrimony in what US Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire Henry Morgenthau,
a full generation before Raphael Lemkin coined "genocide," described
in 1915 as "race extermination." The US National Archives-together
with those of Great Britain, Canada, France, Italy, and even Germany,
a close Turkish ally at the time-comprise thousands of eyewitness,
diplomatic, consular, and military documents which attest to this
first genocide of modern times.

On the balance of commemorative bills and declarations, therefore,
lies the integrity of Western civilization-not the perennial Armenian
quest for recognition and redemption or even Ankara’s long-standing
policy of shameful denial.

If President Obama and Secretary Clinton want to renege on their
previous commitments and so continue their predecessors’ realpolitik
in effective mockery of the exemplary American record, it’s their
prerogative. This resolution and the annual April 24 statement offered
by the president are opportunities for THEM to set AMERICAN history
straight and to pay due tribute to the US and European ambassadors,
consuls, relief officials, servicemen, and missionaries who bore
witness and worked relentlessly but ultimately helplessly to prevent
the Armenian genocide.

Other than that, such initiatives and the standard Turkish response of
blackmail and double jeopardy serve only to trivialize the unrequited
crime against humanity which opened the twentieth century. As a
grandson of four survivors, I lose nothing more if Mr. Obama trumps
his own history and his own conscience by not calling Genocide by
its name. It is he who must decide whether "yes we can" was, like
the White House, an end unto itself.

For Washington, Ankara, and other capitals in alliance, it is high
time to uncover a few fundamental truths, whether they are self-evident
or not.

1. By the vice of genocide the Armenians were fully and finally
uprooted from their heartlands, which remain to this day under
Turkish dominion. Despite the beginnings of a civil-society movement
in Turkey to face history and seek reconciliation through truth,
the leadership of state continues to reap the fruits of genocide by
denying it, criminalizing the very use of that term, laying strategic
pipelines across its killing fields, and asserting its existing de
facto borders with Armenia despite the de jure frontier that was
demarcated by T. Woodrow Wilson’s arbitral award and issued under
presidential seal in November 1920.

2. Accordingly, Turkey has no standing to impose its preconditions
of choice-removal of genocide recognition from the international
agenda, ratification of the existing boundary as negotiated by the
Bolsheviks and Kemalists behind Armenia’s back in 1921, and the
gifting of Mountainous Karabagh to Azerbaijan-upon the establishment
of diplomatic relations with the modern-day Republic of Armenia. If
Ankara wants in good faith to turn a new page with Yerevan, then it
should do so by immediately lifting its unilateral blockade of Armenia,
exchanging notes and then ambassadors, and building confidence to
resolve the array of outstanding issues between them.

This cannot and will not happen through the signature and ratification
of condition-laden protocols with an Armenian administration that
lacks public mandate and basic democratic credentials.

3. Either the two neighboring nations move forward without the positing
of any preconditions whatsoever or, if the Turks really insist on
them, the Armenians must retrieve the symmetry of process and put
all of their positions on the table as well. These might include
remedies, available under customary or conventional international law,
of genocide acknowledgment, atonement, remembrance, and education;
a comprehensive inventory and restoration of the Armenian cultural
heritage; a guaranteed right of return for the progeny of genocide
victims and survivors; a full restitution of properties to the original
owners or their rightful heirs; a final territorial adjudication and
provision of sovereign access to the sea.

If the parties prefer and possess the requisite self-confidence, they
can entrust the whole package to the International Court of Justice.

4. Turkey has no ethical basis or maneuver room to pontificate about
"occupation" except in the context of its own dispossession of the
Armenians, Kurds, Assyrians, Yezidis, Alewis, Greeks, and Cypriots.

As for the Republic of Mountainous Karabagh, whose constitutional
foundations are even firmer than Kosovo’s or Abkhazia’s, it achieved
its post-Stalinist decolonization by referendum held in compliance
with both international and controlling Soviet law and then was
forced to defend it against Azerbaijan’s Turkish-supported but
nonetheless failed war of aggression. If ever the rule of law
really exists, Mountainous Karabagh has earned its independence
and the right to be recognized-through legitimate liberation, not
Ottoman-style occupation. It appears today that the specter of military
conflagration, threatened daily from Baku and between the lines from
Ankara, could overcome the fragile cease-fire in place since 1994.

5. In all events, Germany and its postwar example of cleansing remorse,
reparation and then leadership constitute the appropriate point of
departure. The Genocide and world inaction to punish its perpetrators
begot the Holocaust. Coming full circle, Turkey and its contemporary
generation ought to consider taking the German high road before it’s
too late.

As we approach April 24 and the great American proclamation on its
95th passing, these simple points might better inform policy and give
a more meaningful ring to the words we use, the passages we recite,
and the values we hold hallow.

Raffi K. Hovannisian, Armenia’s first foreign minister, currently
represents the Heritage Party in parliament.

Vahe Karapetian: Homeland Is On The Right Path

VAHE KARAPETIAN: HOMELAND IS ON THE RIGHT PATH

Noyan Tapan
March 22, 2010

LOS ANGELES, MARCH 22, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. The March 4
discussion on Resolution 252 recognizing the Armenian Genocide by the
Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Representatives of the U.S.

Congress was the fourth discussion on this problem. However, as Vahe
Karapetian – a national benefactor, Armenian-American businessman,
member of the Advisory Board of the RA Ministry of Diaspora – told in
an interview with Noyan Tapan, this fourth discussion was much more
significant to the Armenians than the preceding ones and had a number
of noteworthy characteristics, regarding which our talk took place.

– What, in your opinion, was the peculiarity of the discussion of
Resolution 252?

– It was a much more difficult vote than the previous ones. Let’s not
forget that although last year on April 24 President Obama did not use
the word "genocide" (noting that his opinion of the 1915 events did not
change), in the past – prior to becoming president, he had repeatedly
characterized the acts committed against Armenians in 1915 as genocide.

The Speaker of the Congress and many others struggled for years for
adoption of that resolution, but today they all hold high positions.

In this situation Democratic Congressmen found themseleves in a double
position and they had difficulty joining the Armenians’ efforts to
achieve the adoption of the Genocide resolution by the U.S. Congress.

– Do you think this issue will be passed at the Congress?

– There is great danger that this issue will not be passed by the
Congress today because we are not so organized yet. We are not ready
yet. I am sure that next time we will succeed through this new joint
process.

– We all noticed that almost nobody denied the fact of the Armenian
Genocide.

– That was another peculiarity of the vote: almost all the Congressmen
who said no to the resolution noted: "Yes, the Genocide did take place,
but…" This "but" is a political, inadmissible "but" – allegedly for
America’s interests, a "but" allegedly powerless in the face of Iraq,
Afghanistan, and other problems.

After all, nobody accusses present-day Turkey and its people, we accuse
those who committed these actions in the past, and Turkey itself
sentenced many of them to death in 1919. So it is just a political
game by Turkey which condemned the criminals who had committed the
Genocide – because a lot of problems, for example, the problem of
compensation, will arise after its actual recognition.

– In your opinion, what role did the presence of delegates from
Armenia at the vote play?

– Yet another peculiarity of the vote was that it was for the first
time that the representatives of Armenian authorities were standing
during the discussion in that hall – before the eyes of the U.S.

Congressmen. It was an important circumstance as even those
Congressmen, who for years on end were backing the efforts on the
recognition of the Armenian Genocide, witnessed for the first time that
the Diaspora was not alone but the Armenians are united with respect
to that demand. It was a powerful step on the path of perceiving the
unity of the Armenians and that force.

And it was not the first step towards building a bridge of mutual
understanding between Armenia and the Diaspora: the first step was the
open discussion that the president had in Diaspora colonies regarding
the numerous problems and suspicions which arose in connection with
the Armenia-Turkey protocols. We all in the Diaspora appreciated the
greatness and benevolence of the Homeland, and we realized that we
had misinterpreted the Armenia-Turkey protocols.

By taking a few steps, the president proved his aspiration: first,
ensuring longevity of Armenia, longevity and recognition of Artsakh,
improving the economic conditions of the people, and neither losing
the rights of Artsakh nor forgetting the demands of the Armenians
or the Genocide. The president proved this all, especially in the
message he issued in Geneva prior to the protocols’ signing, in which
he announced his determination.

The fact that the Armenian deputies attended the discussion of the
Armenian Genocide problem in the Congress served as an addition to the
presidential message and demonstrated to the Diaspora that Armenia
would support that problem and would not make concessions over the
protocols and any other issue.

– You said that we, the Armenians are not well-organized enough yet.

Do you believe that one day we will succeed in acting unitedly?

– I am convinced that we will become united all over the world. The
Homeland is on the right path. Our force is in our hands.

Turkish NGOs Put Premier To Shame

TURKISH NGOS PUT PREMIER TO SHAME

news.am
March 22 2010
Armenia

A number of Turkish NGOs addressed an open letter to Prime Minister
Recep Erdogan, putting him to shame for his recent threats to deport
illegal Armenian immigrants. The first phrase in the letter is "Shame
on Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan!"

The authors demanded an end to a disgraceful political bargain "behind
the unprotected immigrants’ back." The NGOs stressed that Premier
Recep Erdogan decided to vent his anger at the resolution approved
by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs on
the Armenian immigrants. According to the letter, vulnerable Armenian
migrants have lately become "easy prey" for Turkish politicians. They
have become target despite the fact that they do not enjoy any right to
social protection or personal security. The fact they are constantly
facing the risk of being deported and are repeatedly reminded of
the threat recalls Ottoman Turkey’s policy toward Armenians, says
the letter. According to the letter, Premier Erdogan is only able
to frighten defenseless Armenian immigrants. The authors remind the
Turkish Premier that no one leaves his Homeland for pleasure and no
one stays in a foreign country if he is unable to find a job.

The Turkish authorities’ attitude toward the immigrants is a
disgraceful hate crime. The fate of thousands of peoples must not be
played in struggling against resolution approved by third countries’
Parliaments, says the letter.

NKR President received director-general of Yerevan Brandy Company

Aysor, Armenia
March 19 2010

NKR President received director-general of Yerevan Brandy Company

On 19 March President of the Artsakh Republic Bako Sahakyan received
director-general of the Yerevan Brandy Company Ara Grigoryan.

Issues related to the activities carried out by the company in Artsakh
in 2009 and action plans for the year of 2010 were discussed during
the meeting.

The Head of the State attached importance to the role of the Yerevan
Brandy Company in developing viticulture in the country underlining
the importance of systematized and long-term involvement of the
company in our economy.

The NKR Prime Minister Ara Haroutyunyan was present at the meeting,
informs the Press Office of the NKR President.

Davit Harutyunyan Created Disreputable Legal System In Armenia: Vlad

DAVIT HARUTYUNYAN CREATED DISREPUTABLE LEGAL SYSTEM IN ARMENIA: VLADIMIR KARAPETYAN

Tert.am
11:37 ~U 19.03.10

The Armenian National Congress (ANC) is sure that their timetable
on reforms in the RA electoral system would not be presented to the
Monitoring Committee at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of
Europe (PACE), said ANC foreign relations officer Vladimir Karapetyan.

"No one had any illusions that our document would be presented
at the session of PACE Monitoring Committee, and not that of the
authorities, because the requirement noted in the co-rapporteurs’
February 2 statement was directed to the authorities and it was the
authorities who presented the timetable.

"But our document will make it possible to balance those imitating
actions that the authorities want to present," said Karapetyan,
while talking to Tert.am.

Referring to the necessity of the judicial reforms stated by PACE’s
Monitoring Committee and mentioned by Davit Harutyunyan, Karapetyan
said that Harutyunyan must be held accountable for all the shortcomings
in the juridical and legal system as, during 7 years of office as
Justice Minister, he has had direct participation in the establishment
of this "disreputable juridical and legal system."

"The same Davit Harutyunyan did everything possible so that the
implementation of resolution 1609 will fail, in particular, on
ammendments to the Electoral Code. Now that same person is presenting
a timetable, and now the international community will apply a due
approach to that political figure known for his numerous failures,"
said Karapetyan.

Referring to the timetable presented by the ANC, Karapetyan said that
their proposals are realistic and that the co-rapporteurs, by visiting
Armenia, will discuss with them the provisions presented by the ANC.

Baku Distorts Everything That Accepts, Says Nalbandian

BAKU DISTORTS EVERYTHING THAT ACCEPTS, SAYS NALBANDIAN

Aysor
March 18 2010
Armenia

Madrid Document is still the agenda of talks on settlement to the
Karabakh conflict, said Armenia’s Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian
at the joint press conference, held with Slovak Foreign Minister
Miroslav Lajcak, who is on a visit to Armenia.

Edward Nalbandian pointed that Azerbaijan for a long time refused to
negotiate under the Madrid Document of November 2007, containing the
OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs’ wording on Basic Principles; and since
Azerbaijan involved in talks, it never said of its approval and
acceptance of the Document as a basis for talks. "If Azerbaijan is
accepting the Madrid Document now, then this should be only welcomed,"
said Armenian Foreign Minister.

According to Edward Nalbandian, Aliev administration accepts the
Madrid Document with some exceptions. Nalbandian pointed: "Actually,
the Azerbaijani side excludes more, than accepts; and it even gives a
false color to accepted wordings, meanings of talks and consultations."

According to Nalbandian, MG Co-Chairs have been repeatedly delivering
proposals on settlement to the conflict.

"We discuss these and previous proposals, and this is a usual working
process. Time after time and lately even more actively, Azerbaijan
uses a ‘smokescreen’, saying that one side accepted proposals, or
saying that one side is non-constructive," said Edward Nalbandian.

He also told journalists about his visit to France and meeting with
OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs and Personal Representative of the CiO,
and said that the meeting was held in the same constructive spirit
as in recent years.

Armenian And Russian Patriarchs Visit Tsitsernakaberd

ARMENIAN AND RUSSIAN PATRIARCHS VISIT TSITSERNAKABERD

armradio.am
17.03.2010 13:02

This morning His Holiness Karekin II, Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos
of All Armenians, and His Holiness Kirill I, Patriarch of Moscow and
All Russia, visited the Tsitsernakaberd Memorial to pay tribute to
the memory of the Armenian Genocide victims.

The two Patriarchs laid a wreath at the Memorial to the Armenian
Genocide victims. His Holiness Garegin II conducted a requiem mass,
after which Patriarch Kirill prayed for repose of the souls of the
Genocide victims.

After the prayer the Patriarchs visited the Armenian Genocide
Museum-Institute and walked about the exhibition halls accompanied
by AGMI Director Hayk Demoyan. His Holiness Kirill I left a note
in the Commemoration Book. Later the Patriarch planted a fir at the
Memorial Alley.