Oskanian Says No Impasse in Karabakh Talks

Armenpress

OSKANIAN SAYS NO IMPASSE IN KARABAKH TALKS

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 1, ARMENPRESS: Foreign minister
Vartan Oskanian brushed aside today speculations that
the talks over the long-running Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict were at an impasse, describing the November
28 meeting of Armenian and Russian presidents in
Belarus as ‘positive and constructive."
Oskanian said the presidents, who met on the
sidelines of a CIS summit, centered on those issues
which are not yet solved. ‘Armenia would like the
presidents to reach a complete agreement on these
issues, but regretfully this is not the case yet and
there are disagreements both on basic principles and
details," Oskanian said.
He said the presidents will soon give clear
instructions and guidelines to their foreign ministers
to go on with the talks. Oskanian said there is a real
chance to break the impasse as the 2.5 page document
on the table is a rationale document which may offer a
fresh window of opportunity to resolve the conflict in
2007.
Oskanian then reiterated Armenia’s fundamental
position that the dispute must be settled only on the
basis of the principle of self-determination saying a
referendum in Nagorno-Karabakh could eliminate the
conflict between this and the other principle of
territorial integrity, which Azerbaijan insists must
be respected.
He also commented on Azerbaijani president Ilham
Aliyev’s remarks that the sides approached the final
stage of negotiations. "It is hard to say whether we
have indeed reached this point as there are still many
stumbling blocks, but if Mr. Aliyev thinks so then
Azerbaijan must agree to injecting the authorities of
Nagorno-Karabakh into the talks as the conflict cannot
be resolved without Karabakh participation in the
final stage," he said.

Pope and Armenian Seek to Surmount Schism

Zenit News Agency, Italy
Dec 1 2006

Pope and Armenian Seek to Surmount Schism

Benedict XVI Visits Cathedral to Attend Prayer Service

ISTANBUL, Turkey, NOV. 30, 2006 (Zenit.org).- The ecumenical
character of Benedict XVI’s journey to sister Churches in Turkey was
further highlighted with his visit to the Armenian Apostolic
Cathedral.

The Pope visited the cathedral today to attend a prayer service and
to meet with Patriarch Mesrob II Mutafina.

During the celebration of the Word, following the patriarch’s
address, Benedict XVI clarified that "Our meeting is more than a
simple gesture of ecumenical courtesy and friendship."

"It is a sign of our shared hope in God’s promises and our desire to
see fulfilled the prayer that Jesus offered for his disciples on the
eve of his suffering and death: ‘That they may all be one. As you,
Father, are in me and I in you, may they also be one in us, so that
the world may believe that you have sent me,’" the Pope said, quoting
from John 17:21.

"We must continue therefore to do everything possible to heal the
wounds of separation and to hasten the work of rebuilding Christian
unity," the Holy Father continued. "May we be guided in this urgent
task by the light and strength of the Holy Spirit."

The Armenian Apostolic Church separated from Rome after the Council
of Chalcedon in the year 451, which it was unable to attend because
of war.

Misunderstandings arose when it came to translating the terms of the
Council, thus altering its conceptual comprehension. That, and the
political confrontation with Byzantium, caused the schism, though
Armenian "Monophysitism" always remained a purely verbal error.

Plaque unveiled

The personal meeting and common prayer, as well as the unveiling of a
plaque in the Armenian and Turkish tongue, in memory of the visits of
Paul VI and John Paul II and, now, of Benedict XVI sought to express
the bond that exists between the Armenian Apostolic Church and the
Catholic Church.

It was a moment of recollection, in which the prayers and ritual
sequences making up the prayer service were drawn from various
elements of the Eucharistic celebration of the Armenian liturgy.

Before the entrance procession in the cathedral, in accordance with
the Armenian national tradition, the Holy Father was presented with
bread, salt and rose water as symbols of welcome and good wishes.

As Benedict XVI and Patriarch Mesrob II entered the cathedral, the
choir performed the chant Herasciapar Asdvadz (O Wondrous God), which
recounts the story of the conversion of the Armenian people to
Christianity — the first Christian nation in history — through the
efforts of St. Gregory the Illuminator.

At the foot of the altar, a prayer was recited. The Holy Father and
the patriarch then took their places before the sacred altar, from
which the Gospel, carried in procession from the entrance of the
cathedral, was solemnly proclaimed.

The prayer service in the Armenian cathedral expressed the joy of the
Armenian Apostolic Church at the visit of Benedict XVI.

[no subject]

For Turkey’s Armenians, painful past is muted

By Anne Barnard,
Globe Staff
November 30, 2006

ISTANBUL — When Mesrob II, the Armenian Patriarch of Istanbul and All
Turkey, meets today with Pope Benedict XVI, the o – ne topic he says he
definitely won’t bring up is the o – ne that most intensely interests his
people around the world: the Armenian genocide.

Getting Turkey and the rest of the world to acknowledge the slaughter of
more than 1 million Armenians in the early 20th century, many by troops of
the collapsing Ottoman Empire, is a cherished goal of the Armenian diaspora.
The visit from the spiritual leader of 1 billion Roman Catholics might seem
the perfect opportunity not o – nly to draw attention to the problems of the
tiny Christian minority here, but also to ask the pontiff to press Turkey
for an apology.

But for about 68,000 Turkish citizens of Armenian descent, who — along with
20,000 to 30,000 people from neighboring Armenia who have migrated here in
search of jobs — make up by far the largest Christian community in Turkey,
the situation is much more complicated, even dangerous.

Armenians here must balance a deep need to preserve the memory of the
killings, known in Armenian as metz yeghern, or "the big calamity," with
safeguarding the small community that remains, which to them means avoiding
conflict with the Muslim Turk majority or the nationalist government.
Turkish citizens who mention the killings — including Orhan Pamuk, the
Turkish author who won the Nobel Prize this year — have been charged with
the crime of "insulting Turkishness," and risk fines, jail sentences, and
even death threats.

The Armenian community is treading cautiously around the pope’s visit.
Leaders are seeking his support o – n general issues of religious expression;
during his first two days Benedict has already stressed the importance of
religious freedom. But they are being careful not to embrace too closely a
pontiff widely seen by Muslims as having insulted Islam — and they are
avoiding any public reference to the genocide.

Many Armenians here say they have chosen to leave the past buried — or
partly buried — in order to press for more immediate benefits. They want to
persuade the government to ease o – nerous restrictions, such as laws that ban
Christians from bequeathing land to the church or running independent
seminaries to train priests. And they want to live in peace with the rest of
this country of nearly 80 million people, about 99 percent of whom are
Muslim and overwhelmingly ethnically Turkish.

Mesrob, the leader of the Armenian Orthodox Church here, is a case in point.
Speaking the confident English he perfected at Memphis State University, he
chose his words carefully in an hourlong conversation with three foreign
reporters.

Asked whether he would discuss the genocide with the pope, he said he never
brings up "local issues" with visiting dignitaries. Asked whether he could
state for the record that a genocide took place, he fixed a reporter with a
friendly gaze and was silent for a long moment. Then he said, "I acknowledge
that people were killed."

But Mesrob, 50, spoke more readily when asked what had happened to his own
family at the time. His grandfather’s six brothers were all deported from
the town of Izmit, during a time when many Armenians were shipped off to the
Syrian desert. His grandfather, who escaped to Istanbul and became a baker,
never heard from them again. He assumed most of them died.

Mesrob’s parents and grandparents never told him the details. "They never
talked about it. They didn’t want us to be at odds with our Muslim
neighbors," he said.

"There is no family that didn’t share this situation," said Navart Beren,
51, an administrator at St. Mary’s Church, across the street from the
patriarch’s residence o – n a winding street near the Sea of Marmara, where
she was attending Mass last Sunday. Her parents were close-mouthed, too, she
said: "They didn’t want us to carry revenge in our hearts."

"All that is in the past," said her friend Margarit Nalbantkazar, 52. "But
this did happen: My husband’s father was 8 or 9 years old. He saw them take
his father by hitting him o – n the back of the head with a gun. . . . They
never saw him again."

Murat Belge, a Turkish academic who runs the publishing house that prints
Pamuk’s books, explained why Armenians inside Turkey walk such a fine line
between forgetting and accusing.

Told of the patriarch’s comments, Belge said: "If he had said there was an
Armenian genocide, it’s very likely that he would be assassinated by some
fascists, the patriarchate would be burned, and Armenians leading their
daily lives would be shot by unknown people."

Turkey has always insisted that the deaths, most of them in 1915, were part
of a war in which a beleaguered Ottoman Empire was facing Armenian rebels
allied with its enemies, which included the United States, Britain, and
Russia.

But most historians agree that Armenians were systematically killed and
driven out. The subject is extremely sensitive in Turkey because many of the
military leaders of the dying Ottoman Empire went o – n to found the secular
Turkish republic in 1923.

Also in the 1920s, hundreds of thousands of Greek Orthodox Christians were
forced to leave Turkey as smaller numbers of Muslims were forced out of
Greece, under the agreement that established the Greek and Turkish borders.
Today, Christians make up less than 1 percent of the population.

US policy o – n the Armenian deaths is to respect the position of Turkey, an
important NATO ally, though the 1.2 million Armenians in America fiercely
lobby Congress to recognize the genocide.

Pope John Paul II called the events a genocide in a 2000 document, and in
2001 visited a memorial to the victims in Yerevan, Armenia’s capital. In a
speech there, he avoided the term genocide but adopted the Armenian phrase
"big calamity."

The Vatican has given no indication of whether Benedict will mention the
issue.

Mesrob said he hoped the pope’s visit would improve interfaith relations,
but whether it does "depends o – n what kind of language he’s going to use,"
he added with a chuckle. He said the pope’s September remarks, quoting a
Byzantine ruler’s criticism of Islam as violent, "jeopardized" Christian
minorities.

A metal detector and security checkpoint stand outside Mesrob’s ornate
residence, and security will be extra tight during the pope’s visit, he
said.

Mesrob said Turks do not bear all responsibility for the killings of
Armenians but have "the most important responsibility" because "they were
ruling the country." He said many people believe "ethnic cleansing" was
carried out to "remove Christians from public life."

When asked if Armenians in Turkey have a ceremony or memorial site to
commemorate the killings, he said that they do not, but that people remember
the date April 24, 1915, when Armenian intellectuals in Istanbul were
rounded up and deported, as a kind of "beheading of the community."

Mesrob dismissed recent allegations that he forbids church officials to
speak of the killings. "It’s not a question of silence," he said. "How can
you make friends with someone if you confront them?"

Instead, he recommends cultural exchanges between Armenia and Turkey to pave
the way for an honest discussion of the events, he said. In the meantime, he
said, when foreign governments raise the issue, ethnic Armenians in Turkey
get nervous.

Aida Barsegian, 56, a house cleaner who moved here from Armenia, said it
didn’t help when France passed a law last month declaring it a crime to deny
the genocide. "If they care so much, they should open the borders of France
and let us find work there," she said after lighting candles at the church.
"Here they give me work."

Anne Barnard can be reached at [email protected]

ld/middleeast/articles/2006/11/30/for_turkeys_arme nians_painful_past_is_muted/

http://www.boston.com/
http://www.boston.com/news/wor

Media Advisory: News Conf At The End Of Year Of Armenia In Russia

MEDIA ADVISORY: NEWS CONF AT THE END OF YEAR OF ARMENIA IN RUSSIA

ITAR-TASS News Agency, Russia
November 29, 2006 Wednesday 08:46 AM EST

A news conference devoted to results of the outgoing Year of Armenia
in Russia will be held at the Itar-Tass news agency (2, Tverskoi
Boulevard, 6th floor) at 10:00 on Thursday, November 30.

Taking part in the conference will be Head of the Federal Agency for
Culture and Cinematography, Mikhail Shvydkoy, Armenian Ambassador to
Russia Armen Smbatian, and others.

Admission of Russian and foreign mass media workers to the news
conference is by journalist identification cards.

For more information, please call the Itar-Tass Press Centre at
629-6034, 629-6403 or 629-0585.

The Armenian Peacekeeper Is Recovering, Doctors Say

THE ARMENIAN PEACEKEEPER IS RECOVERING, DOCTORS SAY

Public Radio, Armenia
Nov 30 2006

The health condition of the Armenian peacekeeper Georgy Nalbandyan,
who was seriously injured in Iraq on November 12, has considerably
improved, Mediamax agency reports.

During the past 10 days Lieutenant Georgy Nalbandyan underwent two
surgeries in the Landstuhl medical center near the American Ramstein
military base of Germany.

The peaqcekeeper’s doctor told Mediamax that the patient is rapidly
recovering.

The doctor informed that Georgy Nalbandyan will recover in 2-4 weeks.

He did not rule out that next week Nalbandyan will try to wear the
temporary artificial limb.

Construction Of Armenia-Iran Railroad Considered

CONSTRUCTION OF ARMENIA-IRAN RAILROAD CONSIDERED
By Ara Martirosian

AZG Armenian Daily
30/11/2006

The Agriculture Minister of the Islamic Republic of Iran Mohammad Reza
Esqandar and the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia Andranik
Margarian on a today meeting in Yerevan considered the cooperation
of the two states in the sphere of agriculture and the progress in
the economical relations.

The Governmental Department for Information and Communication with the
Society reports that the officials emphasized the cooperation between
Armenia and Iran in the field of power engineering. They considered the
issues of construction of the Iran-Armenia gas pipeline, exploitation
of the second high-voltage electricity line and construction of an
Iranian-Armenian Hydro Power Plant on the river Arax.

The Armenian Prime Minister and the Agriculture Minister of Iran
also discussed a number of transportation communications project, of
which they emphasized the construction of a new alternative road from
Armenia to Iran, which would make North-South cargo transportations
through Armenia more attractive.

The project of constructing an Iran-Armenia railway was also
considered.

‘Art Of Isfahan’ Exhibition Launches In Yerevan

‘ART OF ISFAHAN’ EXHIBITION LAUNCHES IN YEREVAN
By Melania Badalian

AZG Armenian Daily
30/11/2006

The cooperation of Armenia and Iran in the cultural sphere testifies
to friendly relations between two ancient religions – Christianity
and Islam, Advisor for Cultural Affairs of the Iranian Embassy in
Armenia Reza Atufi stated at the opening ceremony of the "Art of
Isfahan" exhibition in the Yerevan State Museum of Folk Art. R. Atufi
emphasized that that any piece of art which has reached us from the
ancient times can tell us about a nation’s feelings, thoughts and
ambitions, its past history. He was happy to note that thanks to this
exhibition, Armenians will be able to gain better knowledge of works
by Iranian world-famous masters.

It’s worth mentioning that on January 1, 2006, Isfahan was recognized
the cultural capital of the Islamic world in compliance with the
decree of culture ministers of 57 Islamic countries and members of
the Islamic Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.

BAKU: Interview Of President Ilham Aliyev To Azerbaijan National Tel

INTERVIEW OF PRESIDENT ILHAM ALIYEV TO AZERBAIJAN NATIONAL TELEVISION

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
Nov 29 2006

Following is the interview the President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev
gave to the Azerbaijan National Television while flying back to Baku
from Minsk, where he had participated in the summit of the heads of
CIS member-states.

– Mr. President, on the sidelines of the summit of the heads of CIS
member-states, you met with Armenian President Robert Kocharyan. What
could you tell about the outcomes of the meeting?

– It is nearly three years since the Armenia-Azerbaijan,
Nagorno-Karabakh peace talks have been conducted within the framework
of the Prague process. Over this period, there have been quite a few
meetings at both presidents’ and foreign ministers’ level. Of course,
ways of solution to the problem were discussed at the meeting. We
have gone through several stages, and I can say, we are approaching
the final stage of the negotiations. Because, you know, over the three
years of negotiations, all aspects of the problem have been discussed,
and positions of the sides have been completely formed. We already are
at the stage when the future of the negotiations depends on our own
steps. So, in general, I value the outcomes of the meeting as normal.

As you are aware, the Minsk group co-chairs have recently been to
Baku and Yerevan. The Azerbaijani side accepted their proposal i.e.
agreed to have the meeting. On the meeting itself, the talks were
held in a constructive way, focusing on the vexed points, as over the
past period, we have managed to find solution to a number of problems
we could not agree on before. But divergences remain on the crucial
points. As for the Azerbaijan’s position, I would like to reiterate
that our position remains unchanged. Azerbaijan is insistent that
the problem must be solved within our territorial integrity.

The United Nations Security Council’s four resolutions must be
fulfilled: Azerbaijan’s territories must be freed from the occupation
forces, with more than one million Azerbaijanis returning to their
home lands.

I can say, the recent activities of the international organizations
completely satisfy us. The influential international organizations
have already expressed their stance on the problem’s territorial
integrity-based resolution. Of course, this makes our position
stronger. In general, any problem can only be resolved within a
certain framework such as an international law, norm or principle.

Not a single problem can be settled beyond this, and any precedent,
if set, could cause great problems for other countries in future. So,
I would like to say that the Azerbaijan’s fundamental stance remains
unchanged: Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity must be restored. The
people in Nagorno Karabakh must be provided with the high status of
governing within the framework of territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.

– Mr. President, during the past two months you had successful
visits to a number of countries. How do you assess the results of
those visits?

– In general, Azerbaijan’s foreign policy is very active and
successful. I can say, over the past two months, I took quite a
few trips within the country; in particular, in October, I visited
provinces many times. In November, I paid a number of foreign visits.

This visit is the fifth one. In the beginning of the month, I visited
Brussels, the home to the headquarters of the European Union and
NATO. The visit was very successful with important results achieved.

As you know, we have already started the neighborhood policy with
the European Union; this is a very extensive, five-year program. It
applies to both political and economic issues, and I am convinced that
its implementation will accelerate the processes of democratization
in Azerbaijan.

With NATO, we are cooperating within the Individual Partnership Action
Plan, and both sides are very satisfied with the cooperation.

In general, my Brussels visit means strengthening Azerbaijan’s
integration into the EuroAtlantic structures. It is our strategic line,
and it is being successfully implemented. Azerbaijan’s position is
becoming increasingly stronger.

After that, I paid official visit to Russia. It was very important
too. Because Russia is our strategic partner, with which we are
strongly bound up politically and economically. Our meeting with
President Putin was very significance for both sides. I can say, the
visit and its outcomes will serve further deepening of the bilateral
relations, and, I am convinced, will have a positive impact on the
processes taking place in the region.

Later I visited Turkey to partake at the summit of the heads
of Turkic states. We attach great importance to this. As known,
several months ago, the Turkish states and communities held their
congress in Turkey and I attended it. But this one was the summit
of the heads of Turkic states and I had bilateral meetings with the
presidents of Turkey, Kazakhstan, Kyrkyzstan. Strengthening of the
Turkic world is of huge significance. As you know, the summits were
not held for long years. Next summit will be in Azerbaijan. It was
my offer and was accepted. Our relations with both Turkey and other
Turkish-speaking countries fortify and strengthen. These relations
have great significance both on bilateral and multilateral format. As
you know, Azerbaijan is also very active in this direction.

Afterwards, I visited the United Arab Emirates. This visit is of
great importance to develop bilateral relations. Sure, the reached
agreements will lead to intensification of our economic ties, the
delegations will have exchange visits, and of course, our political
relations will enhance. On other hand, I regard this visit in the frame
of Azerbaijan’s cooperation with the Islamic world. We carry out active
work in the frame of the Organization of Islamic Conference. This year,
Azerbaijan hosted two authoritative conferences. Ministers of foreign
affairs and ministers of tourism held conferences in Baku. Cooperation
with the Islamic countries has great importance for us. Azerbaijan
carries out enormous works in this direction and we persistently
feel support of the Islamic countries at UN, the Islamic Conference
Organization, in other international structures. In voting, these
countries uphold us, and we support them. The Islamic solidarity has
become stronger. This is necessary for both the Islamic world and us.

Today, in Minsk, the CIS heads of state had their summit. In the frame
of this meeting, also took place the meetings with the presidents of
Ukraine, Georgia and Belarus. We had useful meetings.

That is, this November, if admitted, combine all major aspects of
our foreign policy. It shows how effective, active and flexible is
our foreign policy. This is very significant. The foreign policy
boosts domestic policy of each country, and it is continuation of
interior policy.

In our country, very successful processes are underway. Political
and economic reforms, solution of the social problems, improvement
of the welfare of people, strengthening of stability and safety –
we achieve all these and strengthen our country. Our foreign policy
has certainly to be successful to reinforce these accomplishments.

Azerbaijan should actively take part at the ongoing regional
processes, and our cooperation with the neighboring countries,
partners, and international organizations is high level. Azerbaijan’s
international position strengthens, and its image on international
arena grows. Azerbaijan, as a reliable partner and friendly country
enhances its position on the world.

– Mr. President, last times, some oppositional forces make claims
connected with mass media. How can you regard them?

– You know, as a whole, the political processes ongoing in Azerbaijan
are positive. Along with political reforms, we continue the economic
reforms either, and I have told several times and I reiterate that
the political reforms should complete the economic reforms. Both of
them should be carried out in parallel. We have already big economic
potential, we have created it. Political reforms, development of
democracy in the country, freedom of word, press, belief, supremacy of
law – all these are our priorities. The more important is carrying out
of economic reforms the more significant are the political reforms. In
absence of strong public control and free society in Azerbaijan, our
economic successes will not have prospects, and they will be for the
short term. Therefore, last years, the core of the political reforms
in Azerbaijan, their essence is to develop the country all-roundedly,
and every citizen benefited all freedoms.

Press freedom in Azerbaijan is available. There are over 500
press organs in the country and function freely. We make serious
steps in this direction. Ensuring freedom of press and word is one
of our priorities, and I can say Azerbaijan has reached notable
accomplishments in this field. As you know, we have joined the new
neighborhood policy of European Union. That plan of activity also
includes continuation of political reforms, that is, it is our
choice. Should we not be definite in this question, nobody could
enforce his views on us. This is our choice, our wish and our will.

That’s way, we should not politicize the situation in connection with
some media bodies. All questions should be solved on legal ground.

Recently, remove of the Azadlig newspaper to other premises has long
been discussed among the oppositional media. This technical matter
is artificially exaggerated as though the state wants to suppress
the oppositional press. On the contrary, we have created very good
conditions for Azadlig newspaper. They, too, will be provided at the
Azerbaijan Publishing House, where all the media bodies are placed.

The question should be treated only on legal ground. There is freedom
of word and press in Azerbaijan, and nobody should doubt it. Sure,
these processes will intensively go ahead in Azerbaijan. As our country
modernizes, enriches, becomes a modern state, and put limits to press
is impossible. In globalizing world, it is impossible to restrict
the press.

As to the situation connected to ANS TV channel, it is, of course,
a matter of discussions, and I consider that this also should not be
regarded politically. I always support strengthening of free press –
years ago and after I was elected President of the country – including
the ANS TV, for which I have also made necessary efforts.

In hard years for the channel, in any case, the Channel’s officials
can affirm this – I have been beside them. I have done this, for, I
consider the strengthening of free and independent press in Azerbaijan
is necessary.

Nevertheless, along with that, every question should be solved on
legal ground. Law is the same for all. We create a legal state in
Azerbaijan. I demand from all officials to follow the laws. From
simple citizens to the head of state, from a journalist to manager
of channel – all should obey the law. One may like the law, another
may dislike. However, this is law and these laws rule society and
country. Nobody can be above the law. In some cases, they disseminate
such opinion that having a press organ, being a journalist or
representative of media, gives special privileges. That is not
right, all are the same before the law. There are public bodies,
the National Television and Radio Council, and they have right
objections, substantial offers and every media organ should provide
them. Therefore, I consider these questions can find their solution
in a working atmosphere and on good intention. Should the objections
and demands are fulfilled in the warning, then, the channel can
function further.

You know, I would note once again, in the present time, it is
impossible to close and restrict any media organ. We live in the
period of Internet. Now, why do we connect the schools to Internet?

That, our people, our children, the youth could be familiarized with
the ongoing processes in world, comprehend the global novelties,
acquire and apply in life.

I often visit the regions, the remote villages. There are satellite
antennas in the far distant villages, and not seldom, but in mass.

That is, restriction of any media is not possible. Soon, the TV
programs will be broadcasted in mobile phones. That is, restriction
is not the goal, and there is no such intention. Merely, all should
observe the law, and all should act in the frame of law. Nobody will
have special conditions. This is my position of principle and I shall
not change it. Every question should be solved on the ground of law.

In that case, not a problem will remain. Should everybody perceive
this and obey the laws, then, all matters will find solution.

I reiterate that it is my viewpoint, and it is my philosophy. I want to
see Azerbaijan as a modern state. Rich and economically strengthened,
politically free, modern, open to the world, ready for cooperation,
able to defend its position, with powerful army, able to restore its
territorial integrity, and I will do my best for this.

Nobody and nothing can avoid me from this way. Thank you.

Armenian, Cypriot Presidents Discuss Prospects Of Bilateral Cooperat

ARMENIAN, CYPRIAN PRESIDENTS DISCUSS PROSPECTS OF BILATERAL COOPERATION

Arka News Agency, Armenia
Nov 27 2006

YEREVAN, November 27. /ARKA/. Presidents of Armenia and Cyprus
Robert Kocharyan and Tasos Papadopoulos discussed the prospects
of Armenian-Cyprian cooperation. During the meeting in Cyprus,
Papadopoulos said that Cyprus will support Armenia in European
integration under the EU-implemented "New Neighborhood" program.

Later the Presidents were joined by representatives of the cultural,
tourist and banking spheres that are considered the most promising
fields in terms of Armenian-Cyprian cooperation. The sides pointed
out the importance of studying the opportunities for economic
cooperation and arranging joint discussions to elaborate business
programs.

A Difficult And Turbulent Journey But The Pope Is Right To Embark On

A DIFFICULT AND TURBULENT JOURNEY BUT THE POPE IS RIGHT TO EMBARK ON IT

Irish Independent
November 27, 2006 Monday

The political and religious world watches as the Pontiff prepares
for a confrontation with Islam

THERE is, we must suppose, an outside chance that Pope Benedict XVI
could be attacked, or even assassinated, during his visit to Turkey,
starting tomorrow.

Some counsellors within the Vatican tried, for this reason, to dissuade
him from carrying out the trip. But rightly, he insisted on going. A
Pope should be ready to be a martyr for his faith, and there could
be few better reasons for martyrdom than a confrontation with Islam.

It is not that Islam is always an aggressive faith, as some would
have it. But it is the rising power in the world of faith, and in the
world of values. And Benedict, as Joseph Ratzinger, has been studying
Islam and the Koran for many decades.

In the Aegean, the greatest opponent of Islam is not the Vatican –
or at least it hasn’t been since the Battle of Lepanto in 1571. The
fiercest opponent of Islam are the Greek Orthodox – and other Eastern
Orthodox – churches, who are the hereditary opponents of Islamic
power in the region.

Greece versus Turkey has meant, for centuries, Orthodox Christianity
versus Ottoman Islam. The old (and by now probably offensive) joke
that a "Turkish Delight" was a Greek massacre derives from this
deep fault-line.

In the 19th century, William Gladstone was almost as exercised by the
massacres of the Bulgarians by the Turks as he was by the problems
of Ireland. He wrote screeds on this question – which was, for him,
a question of Christianity versus Islam.

A similar perspective arose over the genocide of the Armenians
during the First World War, when, it has been claimed that more than
a million and a half Armenian Christians were exterminated by the
dying Ottoman Empire.

Again, the deep cultural fissure wasn’t just race, or nation, but
religion, and again it was Christians versus an Islamic nation.

Kemal Ataturk, the modernising Turkish President from 1923 to 1938,
secularised Turkey and brought in many other reforms, including the
abolition of the caliphate – rule by a religious authority – and the
advancement of women’s rights. (A quirkey aside to Ataturk’s career
is that he is said to have been an admirer – and possibly a lover –
of the young Zsa Zsa Gabor.)

Rural Turkey was never secularised in the same way as Istanbul and
Ankara – much, perhaps, as rural Ireland retains the practice of faith
while Dublin’s churches grow empty. Yet, after Ataturk’s influence,
Turkey was, until now, easy-going and tolerant about religion, and
never imposed strict laws about liquor, for instance, in the manner
of other Islamic countries; there is even a common Turkish brandy
known as raki. Visitors to Turkey today still find it, overall,
a congenial place, without the prohibitions that now characterise
other Islamic nations.

Yet, more experienced observers note the changes occurring beneath the
surface – an Islamic revival growing apace. Lord Norwich, an expert on
the Eastern Mediterranean, writing as John Julius Norwich, recently
said that the change is profound. "Forty years ago, no politician in
Istanbul went to the Mosque. Now, no major politician dares not go."

And, like all Islamic countries, Turkey’s birth-rate is copious, with
16.62 births per 1000 of the population; whereas its old enemy, Greece,
now has one of the lowest birth-rates in Europe, with 9.72 per 1000 of
the population. If trends continue, the Greeks will be wiped out within
a few generations. And if Turkey should enter the European community,
its burgeoning population could prove a dominant factor in the future
of the Community. (Benedict is known to be opposed to Turkey’s entry.)

Pope Benedict’s mission is primarily, of course, religious, although
the Vatican, being a power in the world, cannot but help wield
political power at least indirectly.

Thus, the watching world makes much of the Holy Father’s meetings
of intentioned "rapprochement" with Islam, through the person Ali
Bardakoglu, the head of Turkey’s religious affairs directorate. The
Islamic Turks have made it plain that they expect the Pontiff to
apologise a little more grovellingly for having been critical of
Islam in his Regensburg address.

And yet, the Pope’s first loyalty must be to brother Christians in
the Orthodox traditions, who, all over the Eastern Mediterranean
are under pressure from the expansion of Islam, from Cyprus to the
Lebanon and to Palestine itself.

In Ireland, we are apt to think that the divisions within Christianity
are Catholic and Protestant: but the religious wars of western Europe
are in the past. We now need to be much more aware of that other
branch of Byzantine Christianity which is effectively in the front
line in the culture clash with Islam – and apparently losing ground.

Benedict cannot assuage the Muslims at the expense of the Orthodox
churches, and he would be a diplomatic genius if he managed to be on
equally good terms with both. However carefully he treads, this is
bound to be a difficult and turbulent journey: but he is absolutely
right to make it.