Forbes: Ankara Doesn’t Want Obama To Win Over His Pledge To Recogniz

FORBES: ANKARA DOESN’T WANT OBAMA TO WIN OVER HIS PLEDGE TO RECOGNIZE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

PanARMENIAN.Net
30.09.2008 18:04 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ There is no doubt that much of the Muslim world
is rooting for Barack Obama in the U.S. presidential race, Asli
Aydintasbas, an Istanbul-based journalist and former Ankara bureau
chief of the newspaper Sabah, writes in "Obama, Turkey And The
G-Resolution" published by Forbes magazine.

"But here in Turkey, the Obamania in the rest of the Muslim world was
quick to fade early in the race. Once intrigued by the young senator
and his life story, much of the Ankara establishment and the Turkish
elite now say they prefer John McCain to snatch the presidential
seat. And all this has little to do with Barack Obama himself,"
the article says.

"Modern Turkey is a nation still sorting through the cultural and
political clashes that have emerged with the foundation of a secular
modern republic from the ashes of the Ottoman Empire in 1923. It
is a nation accustomed to both domestic and foreign conflict and
obsessed with the idea of its loneliness on the world stage. So it
is no surprise that, on any given subject under the sun, most Turks
would ask, "But is it good for Turkey? In this case, the political
establishment in Ankara and Turkey’s secular elite seem to think that
Barack Obama is not good for Turkey," it goes on.

It all has to do with the Armenian issue, according to a Turkish
politician.

"Barack Obama has pledged he would support a genocide resolution. Worse
for Ankara, his running mate Senator Joe Biden has long been an
ally of Greek and Armenian lobbies in Washington and sponsored bills
questioning Turkish policies on Cyprus and Armenia," he said.

"John McCain on the other hand knows Turkey well and can understand
our strategic value," the politician added.

EDM: Business Confidence Returning to Azerbaijan-Georgia Corridor

Eurasia Daily Monitor

September 29, 2008 — Volume 5, Issue 186

BUSINESS CONFIDENCE RETURNING TO AZERBAIJAN-GEORGIA TRANSPORT CORRIDOR
AFTER THE AUGUST WAR

by Vladimir Socor

Russia’s invasion of Georgia in August caused partial and temporary
disruptions to the transport corridor for Caspian oil and other commodities
through that country. The two-pronged corridor, running from Azerbaijan to
the Georgian Black Sea coast and via Georgia to the Turkish Mediterranean
coast, is now functioning at nearly the same overall capacity as it did
prior to the conflict.

Business confidence in this transport route is rebounding fast, driven
by Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan in the region and encouraged by the U.S.
government. The return of confidence reflects both the West’s strategic
stake in this route and the Caspian oil exporters’ imperative need to use
this unique westbound outlet.

On September 19 the recently appointed head of Kazakhstan’s oil and
gas state company KazMunayGaz, Kairgeldy Kabyldin, announced that Kazakhstan
would go ahead with the earlier plan to ship oil to Baku for pumping into
the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline. The additional oil volumes from
Kazakhstan would increase that line’s throughput from the current annual
rate of 37 to 40 million tons (800,000 to 850,000 barrels per day) to 50
million tons (1 million bpd) of oil annually by 2009-2010. Moreover,
KazMunayGaz proposes to participate with Azerbaijan and Turkey in a project
to build an oil refinery and petrochemical plant at the Ceyhan terminal.

"I would not say today that the risks of [using] BTC have increased
owing to the Russia-Georgia conflict. On the contrary, the transit of Kazakh
oil in this direction will add an element of stability in the region,"
Kabyldin told Kazakh media (Panorama [Almaty], September 19).

On September 24 President Nursultan Nazarbayev, inspecting oil
infrastructure projects on Kazakhstan’s Caspian littoral, confirmed the plan
to develop the Kuryk seaport as a major oil export terminal "for handling
large volumes of crude from Kashagan" (Kazakhstan TV Channel One, September
24). Kuryk is projected to serve the supergiant Kashagan offshore oilfield,
part of whose future output is intended to be shipped by sea tankers to
Baku. From there, two continuation routes are envisaged: the BTC pipeline
(boosting its throughput to ultimately 70 million tons annually or 1.4
million bpd) and Georgian Black Sea export terminals. In all of these cases
Kazakhstan’s and Azerbaijan’s reliance on the South Caucasus corridor will
keep growing.

On September 27 KazMunayGaz’s transport subsidiary KazTransOil
confirmed its earlier plans to invest in Georgia’s Batumi harbor and oil
export terminal. The investment program, which envisages capacity expansion
and equipment modernization, remains in force. KazMunayGaz and KazTransOil
intend to reach the targets previously set for 2008 and 2009 in terms of
investment and transshipment at Batumi (Interfax, September 27).

KazMunayGaz has dropped its earlier intention to build an oil refinery
in Batumi at an estimated cost of $1 billion for an annual processing
capacity of 5 to 7 million tons. This was unrelated to the Russia-Georgia
conflict or risks to the transport corridor. The Kazakh company made this
decision some months ago, citing differences with the Georgian government
over some of the proposed contract terms. Meanwhile, KazMunayGaz and
KazTransOil continue investing in the oil transport corridor to Batumi. The
Kazakhs acquired the sea port and oil terminal in February of this year from
the Danish-led Green Oak Group (Interfax, Civil Georgia, Reuters, September
24).

According to Kabyldin, the company is also interested in sharing the
Baku-Supsa oil pipeline’s capacity with BP and Azerbaijan, as well as in
sharing the Supsa terminal on the Georgian Black Sea coast. The line, closed
for the last two years, was about to reopen when the Russian invasion
occurred and is undergoing tests at present. Meanwhile the Georgian coastal
terminal Kulevi, owned by Azerbaijan’s State Oil Company and paralyzed
during the August conflict, has resumed operations (Turan, September 9;
Panorama [Almaty], September 19).

The one likely setback to the transport corridor is unrelated to oil.
Kazakhstan’s Agriculture Minister Akylbek Kurishbayev informed parliament on
September 22 that his ministry had recommended to the government to drop the
planned construction of a grain export terminal in Georgia’s harbor of Poti.
The ministry cited "international problems and the current situation in
Georgia" as reasons for its recommendations. The Kazakh government has yet
to announce its decision on the matter. The agreement with Georgia, signed
in 2007, envisaged a terminal with a capacity of 500,000 tons, equal to one
tenth of Kazakhstan’s annual grain exports at present. Poti is closer to
Kazakhstan than any other possible open-sea outlet for exporting grain
(Kazinform, Reuters, September 22).

Russian forces vandalized parts of the Poti harbor in August, but the
port is rapidly recovering. The Investment Authority of Ras Al Khaimah
(United Arab Emirates, UAE) acquired a 51% stake in the seaport, along with
management rights and the free industrial zone, in April of this year. The
UAE’s Saqr Port Authority (SPA) operates the port. According to the company’
s CEO Venkatesh Govinda, once the Russians withdrew, "it is business as
usual in Poti," with port services for Georgia, Armenia, Kazakhstan, and
Azerbaijan returning to normal. The UAE operator expects cargo volumes to
increase significantly, due to Western aid coming into Georgia (Gulf News,
September 12).

The South Caucasus transport corridor appeared vulnerable during the
Russian invasion of Georgia and its immediate aftermath. The Russians did
not inflict major or long-term damage to the corridor. Rather, they
demonstrated their ability to interrupt its functioning temporarily, for
example, by blowing up the Kaspi railroad bridge, which Georgia has since
restored. Moscow almost certainly does not seek to disable the existing
corridor but rather to prevent its planned expansion by discouraging major
investments.

Countries in the region and their Western partners, however, are
guided by a different logic. They realize that the greater the turnover of
goods and commodities, the higher the international stake in this strategic
corridor, thus decreasing the risk of Russian mischief in the future.

–Vladimir Socor

Minas Avetisian’s Wall-Painting Toros Roslin’S Birth Being Restored

MINAS AVETISIAN’S WALL-PAINTING TOROS ROSLIN’S BIRTH BEING RESTORED

Noyan Tapan

Se p 26, 2008

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 26, NOYAN TAPAN. On the occasion of painter
Minas Avetisian’s 80th birth anniversary, a jubilee exhibition of
painter’s works will be opened at the National Gallery of Armenia
in October. Later, in the spring of 2009, an exhibition of Minas
Avetisian’s works will be also organized in Moscow and Florence.

Sona Haroutiunian, an Adviser to the RA Minister of Culture, said
this at the meeting held on September 25 at the Novosti Armenia
club. According to her, thanks to specialists, who have already
arrived from Italy on the occasion of the jubilee, one out of eleven
wall-paintings of the painter is being restored. It is Toros Roslin’s
Birth, which was at Gyumri Electrotechnical Factory. The other four
wall-paintings of Minas are also at the same factory. They also need
urgent restoration.

Painter’s son Arman Avetisian said that the state has allocated
5m drams for the restoration of wall-painting Toros Roslin’s
Birth. However, according to him, the other 10 wall-paintings also
need restoration. Three out of the other wall-paintings of M. Avetisian
are in Yerevan and the rest are in the Shirak region.

A catalogue of Minas’ works will be published and a film on the process
of wall-paintings’ restoration will be shot with the assistance of
Moscow Foundation of Armenian Culture.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=117736

OSCE Report On Freedom Of Media

OSCE REPORT ON FREEDOM OF MEDIA

A1+
[07:44 pm] 26 September, 2008

Comments on the Draft Law "On Making a Supplement to the Republic of
Armenia Law on Television and Radio" regarding licensing moratorium1

This report deals with a proposal to supplement Republic of Armenia
Law on Television and Radio by adding the following Article:

ARTICLE 1. In Article 59 of the RA Law on Television and Radio
(9 October 2000, HO-97, hereinafter referred to as Law) add a new
paragraph with the following contents:

"Competitions for licensing of television and radio broadcasting shall
not be announced until 20 July 2010. TV companies having license that
expires before 21 January 2011 may submit an application for extending
the validity period of the license to the National Commission. The
validity period of the license is extended for the claimed period
but not longer than 21 January 2011".

ARTICLE 2. This Law becomes effective from the 10th day following
its official promulgation.

Background

This supplement to the Law on Television and Radio, developed by
the Armenian Ministry of Economy, was adopted in an extraordinary
session of the Parliament in first, second and third readings in early
September without any prior public discussion and consultation. This
has received strong criticism from local media and NGOs that
feel that the moratorium on new licences is especially aimed at
preventing independent broadcasters from gaining a licence. In
the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly Resolution 1620
(2008) from June 2008 Armenia is urged to ensure "open, fair and
transparent licensing procedure", especially against the background
of a decision of the European Court of Human Rights, upholding an
application of an independent TV station critical of the Government,
which controversially lost its broadcast license in 2002. Independent
media and NGOs see the moratorium as yet another way to distort an
open and fair licensing procedure, using the digitalisation procedure
as an excuse. The Law on Television and Radio does not include any
provisions on digitalisation. This supplement does not introduce such
rules, but takes a first step in the digitalisation process. However,
there is a danger that the broadcasting landscape in Armenia is not
ready for this step as there is a lack of plurality and diversity.

Digitalisation

The time for starting digitalisation is basically up to each country,
within the rules set by the International Telecommunications Union
(ITU) relating to the frequency spectrum. Such rules entail that
even if it is nominally for each country to decide if and when to
digitalise, at 1 The Author of the Comments is Professor Katrin
Nyman-Metcalf, OSCE independent expert.

some point this change must happen. In the EU there is no common
switch-over date but a goal of switch-over by at least 2012. The
views expressed by civil society and by the authorities on the timing
for Armenia can be seen as conflicting opinions about which it is
not possible to say what is best, without a careful analysis of the
specific conditions in Armenia.

In any case preparations should be made as early as possible,
in consultation with those involved, including the broadcasting
sector and civil society. A moratorium may not be the best first
step. Digitalisation should not be allowed to reduce diversity
and plurality and should never be used as an excuse to limit free
and independent broadcasting. If the broadcasting landscape in a
country is not pluralistic and diverse, it would be better to delay
digitalisation and undertake other reforms first.

Reasons for a moratorium The justification for the amendment is
that the Republic of Armenia is preparing for digital radio- and
TV-broadcasting system in the territory of Armenia.. It is in line
with international practice to have a period of moratorium for issuing
analogue licences. How this is designed varies between countries,
as the way and the timetable how to digitalise varies.

The reason it is useful to have a moratorium is that it is very
expensive to have parallel analogue and digital broadcasting. If
existing analogue licences have to be terminated before their time of
expiry (because analogue broadcasting is switched-off) several legal
issues may arise like the question of legitimate expectations. Licences
cannot just be terminated early without consideration for the interests
of broadcasters that have made investments and counted on a certain
business period. It is therefore better to ensure over time that the
change is introduced gradually, for which a moratorium at some point
may be needed.

Switch-over from analogue to digital

One key issue in the switch-over process is frequency management. As
the same frequency spectrum is used for digital and analogue the
digitalisation plan, the law and the work of the regulator need to
set out how to handle the transfer. A moratorium on new licences
for analogue may be one step in the process, but this should
not be introduced if the broadcasting landscape is not diverse
and pluralistic. In countries that have completed all or part of
the digitalisation process, existing broadcasters have been given
preference for the digital content licences. There is thus a risk
that the initial stages of digitalisation will mean less choice so the
broadcasters that are included in the early platforms, especially the
free platforms, will be very important. The public service broadcaster
must have a place on such a platform but also the other channels
given space in the digital broadcasting system must be selected to
allow plurality and diversity.

Regulatory principles

Legitimate expectations and principles of good administration including
legal certainty must be considered by the regulator. Amendments to
conditions as well as cancellation of given authorisations must always
be made in objectively justified manner and proportionately. Those
concerned must be given reasonable time to adjust and shall also be
given a chance to express their views on changes. In the process
of digitalisaton the regulator needs to include requirements of
digitalisation in licences for some time before the switch-over, so
that broadcasters can start preparing for this. This typically happens
some 5 years of more before the actual change (e.g. in the UK where
a special scheme was also established to help with the switch-over).

Conclusions

The main problem with the amendment to the law is the manner how it
was passed, without consultations. This is a serious problem as in
the introduction of a new process, it is very important to involve
the sector. It is correct that a moratorium may at some point
be introduced. This is because digital and analogue uses the same
frequencies and at the switch-over all broadcasters must be ready. It
is very expensive to maintain a parallel system for any length of time.

Existing stations should normally have the possibility to go
digital. As new stations will not be licensed for a certain
period, it is very important that there is a pluralistic system
when digitalisation is introduced. The Council of Europe Committee
of Ministers Recommendation Rec(2003)9 on measures to promote the
democratic and social contribution of digital broadcasting sets out
a set of principles for member states to apply to the development of
digital broadcasting. This mentions media pluralism especially.

The Recommendation supports a rapid changeover to digital broadcasting
but this should be done while making sure that the interests of
the public as well as of all categories of broadcasters are taken
into account. In doing so, an appropriate legal framework as well as
favourable technical and economic conditions must be provided. Even if
a moratorium will be inevitable, this should not be introduced in such
a way as to reduce diversity. The Council of Europe Recommendation
specifically mentions the licensing process and that services on
offer must be varied.

All-Armenian Fund 3 Projects Officially Opened in Nagorno Karabakh

PRESS RELEASE
Hayastan All-Armenian Fund
Governmental Buiding 3, Yerevan, RA
Contact: Hasmik Grigoryan
Tel: +(3741) 56 01 06 ext. 105
Fax: +(3741) 52 15 05
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:

26 September, 2008

Hayastan All-Armenian Fund Three Projects Officially Opened in Nagorno
Karabakh

Yerevan, September 26, 2008 – Opening ceremonies of the Hayastan Fund three
projects – Togh School, Hadrut and Spitakashen water mains followed each
other in Nagorno Karabakh on September 23 and 24.

Students of the Togh school have started the new academic year in improved
conditions. The two-storey building of the school, severely damaged in the
1988-1992 conflict, is now standing new and welcoming. Today some 100
students attend the school. Years later, today’s sixteen first-graders’
lasting memory of their school will be of an attractive place to study at
and a good number of accomplishments.

<I believe this school will be a stimulus both for the students and the
teachers to do even better", said Ara Vardanyan in his speech.

The upgraded part of the school has enough space and facilities to also
accommodate children from the neighboring communities of Jrakuis,
Mariamadzor, Taghut, Tsakuri Hakaku, Mokhrenes, and Tumi. Not only the
classrooms are now well-lit and clean, they are nicely furnished and will be
heated during the winter months. Renovation of the left block of the Togh
School (around US 139 million AMD) was funded within the Artsakh Rebirth
Project and was carried out through the Hayastan Fund Western Region
Affiliate with direct contribution from the AGBU Manoogian-Demirdjian school
students and parents.

Among those attending the opening ceremony were the Nagorno Karabakh Prime
Minister Araik Harutyunyan, Head of the Hadrut Administration Valerik
Gevorkyan, Hayastan Fund Acting Executive Director Ara Vardanyan, Western
Region Affiliate Executive Director Sargis Kotanjian, Minister of Civil
Construction Anahit Vardanyan employees of the Fund, contractors and
others.

"One thing that is special about this project is that the school has been
renovated with the money collected by students and their parents of a
similar school", said Sargis Kotanjian addressing the participants of the
ceremony.

"Now when we are implementing reforms to integrate into the international
educational system, our school will undoubtedly meet the necessary
standards. The laboratories of physics, chemistry, and informatics are
adequately equipped and a great help to the teaching staff in the teaching
process. We wouldn’t even dream about it a few years ago", said the School
Principal Vladimir Ghahryan.

Following the opening ceremony of the Togh School, the officials left for
Hadrut to attend the opening ceremony of the Togh-Hadrut water main. "We
realize how important water supply is in most parts of Nagorno-Karabakh",
said the Fund Acting Executive Director Ara Vardanyan.The Hadrut city water
main project with the total cost of around 420 million AMD was implemented
within the Telethon 2006, and was mainly sponsored by the Fund’s French
local committee. Within the project a 22 km water pipe was installed from
Arjaghbyur to Hadrut. Thanks to the project, water is run by gravity now and
it will provide the city households will much needed water of a better
quality.

Construction of the Kaghartsin-Spitakashen 8 km long water main will provide
water to the Spitakashen community of around 470. The project worth about 80
million AMD was sponsored by the Hayastan Fund Argentine local committee.
During the opening ceremony all the villagers expressed their gratitude to
Armenians in Argentine for their generous support.

The Hadrut regional hospital and the gas supply will be completed by the end
of the year. Construction of schools in Spitakasken and Chartar villages
will start next month. The water supply project in Berdashen is already
underway.

###

Hayastan All-Armenian Fund

http://www.himnadram.org/

Turkey Tries To Oppose The Official Yerevan To Diaspora

TURKEY TRIES TO OPPOSE THE OFFICIAL YEREVAN TO DIASPORA

AZG Armenian Daily
26/09/2008

Armenia-Turkey

The enthusiasm in Turkish officials and representatives’ speeches on
Armenian-Turkish relations prompts that the Turkish government has
great expectations of the Armenian authorities. Moreover, as long as
the Genocide recognition remains the knottier question for Turkey, the
Turkish officials will speak more enthusiastically about formation of
a joint body. As enthusiastically that even Turkish Foreign Minister
Ali Babacan assured the Turkish and international news agencies
on September 10 after Serzh Sargsian – Abdullah Gul meeting that
"the issue should be observed as settled, as Serzh Sargsian gave his
consent to it (creation of such a body)".

In other words, without even creating such a body and discussing
any question, the Turkish authorities try to form an international
opinion about stopping the process of the Genocide recognition in
order to prepare a diplomatic-advocating march in the nature "We are
negotiating. Why are you hindering us from doing it?"

Moreover, not only the Turkish advocacy but also the consent
of the executive bodies of the countries that restrain their
parliamentarians from raising the issue of the Genocide contribute
to the above-mentioned.

Ali Babacan, like other Turkish representatives, show an unusual
thoughtfulness for the people of Armenia underlining their sufferings
and needs without even asking himself what percent of those sufferings
are because of Turkish enmity. Of course, not the compassion is
the reason of the Turkish Foreign Minister’s crocodile tears but
the aspiration to oppose Armenia to Diaspora. "On the one hand
the suffering people, on the other hand the well-off and surfeited
Diaspora that is in a position of power in Europe and United States",
Ali Babacan said adding, "The agendas of these two are different".

We cannot agree with the last expression and want to correct it – the
difference is not between the Armenians in motherland and Diaspora,
but between the official Yerevan and the people in general.

Yes, the governments sometimes may have agendas different from
their people. And the governments cannot demand lands if in case
of negative answer they have no ready guns. And not even repayment
for the sufferings and losses. But different (agendas) doesn’t mean
opposite. And the Armenian authorities should be very cautious in
their announcements and statements, in order there will not be contrary
agendas and in order our opponents will not take the opportunity. On
the contrary, the agendas should be systematized, and distribution
of roles should be organized.

Opening Of Armenian-Turkish Border Is Beneficial For Both Armenia An

OPENING OF ARMENIAN-TURKISH BORDER IS BENEFICIAL FOR BOTH ARMENIA AND TURKEY, POLITICAL SCIENTIST V. DILANIAN CONSIDERS

Noyan Tapan

Se p 24, 2008

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 24, NOYAN TAPAN. Opening of the Armenian-Turkish
border is beneficial for both Armenia and Turkey. Vahan Dilanian,
the Chairman of Yerevan Center for Studies of Political Developments,
said at the September 24 press conference. According to him, it is
beneficial for Turkey in the respect that Armenia is the shortest
way to Middle Asia and Azerbaijan.

Besides, it will essentially contribute to development of Turkey’s
eastern regions. The third advantage, according to him, is that in case
of opening the border Turks will get rid of the Kurdish burden: the
latters will migrate to Armenia and other South Caucasian countries,"
V. Dilanian said.

And for Armenia, according to the political scientist, opening of
the border will give a possibility to easily penetrate into the Arab
World and Europe.

According to V. Dilanian, at present Turkey tries to play an important
role in the issue of Nagorno Karabakh settlement. As he evaluated,
as a result of the meeting of Foreign Ministers to be held in late
September in New York considerable progress can be recorded in the
issue of Nagorno Karabakh settlement.

In V. Dilanian’s opinion, Turks do not admit the Armenian Genocide as
they do not believe that their ancestors have committed such an evil.

"Recognition of the Genocide is more beneficial for Turkey,
as it will deliver the latter from pressures exerted by European
countries and Senate for many years," he said adding that the current
Armenian-Turkish relations give serious guarantees in that respect.

According to Turkish political scientist, analyst Turgut Kerem Tuncal,
the problems of the past should be put aside and all possibilities
should be used for establishing good-neighborly relations between
the two peoples.

According to him, the normalization of the Armenian-Turkish relations
will not be an easy process. "That way will be very difficult,
but as they say, sometimes treatment is painful but saves one’s
life," he said. According to him, the sides should start to improve
their relations from very small and mild steps. They are: opening of
borders, establishment of diplomatic relations. And the most important,
according to T. Kerem Tuncal, establishment of relations between the
publics of the two countries should be the axis of development of
these relations.

T. Kerem Tuncal also said that Turkey can play the role of a mediator
in the issue of Nagorno Karabakh settlement. "Having a stable Caucasus
is in Turkey’s interests, therefore Turkey will seek to solve that
problem," he said. According to the Turkish political scientist,
it will also deliver Armenia from dependence on Russia.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=117671

U.S. Ambassador To Armenia Hands To President Sargsyan Congratulator

U.S. AMBASSADOR TO ARMENIA HANDS TO PRESIDENT SARGSYAN CONGRATULATORY MESSAGE OF GEORGE BUSH ON THE OCCASION OF ARMENIA’S INDEPENDENCE DAY

ARMENPRESS
Sep 22, 2008

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 22, ARMENPRESS: Newly appointed U.S. ambassador
to Armenia Marie Yovanovitch handed over today her credentials to
the Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan.

Presidential press service told Armenpress that congratulating the
diplomat on her new appointment, President Sargsyan said that Armenia
underscores the development of multilateral relations with the United
States. He thanked the American government for the continuative
support provided to Armenia since the latter’s independence.

Serzh Sargsyan highly assessed the role of the USA as one of the
co-chairing countries of the OSCE Minsk Group, in the process of
regulation of Karabakh conflict. The newly appointed ambassador
conveyed to the Armenian president the congratulatory message of
U.S. President George Bush on the occasion of Independence Day
of Armenia.

Expressing readiness of the United States to support Armenia’s
progress in democracy and market economy, the diplomat said that she
will exert all her efforts for the development of bilateral relations
and their expansion.

Marie Yovanovitch greeted on behalf of the U.S. government the brave
initiative of Serzh Sargsyan to invite Turkish president and noted
that it has a great importance for the region and will promote the
establishment of peace and democracy.

During the conversation the interlocutors referred to the
Armenian-American economic partnership issues and exchanged thoughts
over regional developments. The president assured that the ambassador
will get all the necessary support from the Armenian authorities
during her activity.

A1+ – Stop Anti-Semantic Attackes On Ter Petrosian’s Wife

STOP ANTI-SEMANTIC ATTACKS ON TER-PETROSSIAN’S WIFE

A1+
[12:07 pm] 22 September, 2008

International Religious Freedom Report 2008

Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

The Constitution provides for freedom of religion; however, the law
places some restrictions on the religious freedom of adherents of
minority religious groups.

The Government generally did not enforce existing legal restrictions
on religious freedom. There was no change in the status of respect
for religious freedom by the Government during the reporting
period. Jehovah’s Witnesses continued to report that judges sentenced
them to longer prison terms for evasion of alternative service than in
the past, although the sentences were within the range allowed by law.

There were reports of societal abuses and discrimination based on
religious affiliation, belief, or practice.

The U.S. Government discusses religious freedom with the Government
as part of its overall policy to promote human rights.

Section I. Religious Demography

The country has an area of 11,500 square miles and a population of
3.2 million. Approximately 98 percent of the population is ethnic
Armenian. The link between Armenian ethnicity and the Armenian Church
is strong. An estimated 90 percent of citizens nominally belong to the
Armenian Church, one of six ancient autocephalous Eastern churches
with its spiritual center (Mother See) located at the Etchmiadzin
cathedral and monastery near the capital of Yerevan.

There are small communities of other religious groups. There was
no reliable census data on religious minorities, and estimates from
congregants varied significantly. These groups constitute less than 5
percent of the population and include Roman Catholics, Armenian Uniate
(Mekhitarist) Catholics, Orthodox Christians, Armenian Evangelical
Christians, Molokans, Pentecostals, Seventh-day Adventists, Baptists,
various groups of charismatic Christians, Jehovah’s Witnesses, members
of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons), Yezidis
(non-Muslim Kurds who practice Yezidism), Jews, Sunni Muslim Kurds,
Shi’ite Muslims, Baha’is, and others. Yezidis are concentrated
primarily in agricultural areas around Mount Aragats, northwest of
Yerevan. Armenian Catholics live mainly in the north, while most Jews,
Mormons, Baha’is, and Orthodox Christians reside in Yerevan, along
with a small community of mostly Shi’ite Muslims, including Iranians,
and temporary residents from the Middle East.

Section II. Status of Religious Freedom

Legal/Policy Framework

The Constitution provides for freedom of religion and the right
to practice, choose, or change religious belief. Nevertheless,
it recognizes "the exclusive mission of the Armenian Church as a
national church in the spiritual life, development of the national
culture, and preservation of the national identity of the people of
Armenia." The Constitution and the Law on Freedom of Conscience and
Religious Organizations establish the separation of church and state
but grant the Armenian Church official status as the national church.

The April 2007 Law on the Relations of the Republic of Armenia and
the Armenian Church regulates the special relations between the state
and the Armenian Church and grants certain privileges to the Armenian
Church that are not available to other religious groups. It makes the
Armenian Church’s marriage rite legally binding, but the supporting
legal acts to enforce this were not in place at the end of the period
covered by this report. The law also allows the Armenian Church to
have permanent representatives in hospitals, orphanages, boarding
schools, military units, and all places of detentions, while the Law
on Freedom of Conscience and Religious Organizations permits other
religious organizations to have representatives in these places on
demand only. In general, the Law on the Relations of the Republic
of Armenia and the Armenian Church formally recognizes the moral
as well as ethnic role that the Armenian Church plays in society,
as most citizens see it as an integral part of national identity,
history, and cultural heritage.

The Government observes January 6, the day on which the Armenian
Church celebrates Christmas, as a national holiday.

The law does not mandate registration of nongovernmental organizations,
including religious groups; however, only registered organizations have
legal status. Only registered groups may publish more than one thousand
copies of newspapers or magazines, rent meeting places, broadcast
programs on television or radio, or officially sponsor the visas
of visitors, although there is no prohibition on individual members
doing so. To qualify for registration, religious organizations must "be
free from materialism and of a purely spiritual nature," have at least
200 adult members, and subscribe to a doctrine based on "historically
recognized holy scriptures." The registration requirements do not refer
to the religious organizations of national minorities. The Office of
the State Registrar registers religious entities. The Department of
Religious Affairs and National Minorities oversees religious affairs
and performs a consultative role in the registration process.

There were no reports of the Government refusing registration to
religious groups that qualified for registration under the law.

The Law on Alternative Service allows conscientious objectors–subject
to government panel approval–to perform either noncombatant military
or labor service duties rather than serve as combat-trained military
personnel. The law took effect in 2004 and applies to subsequent
draftees and those serving prison terms for draft evasion. A January
2006 amendment to the Criminal Code criminalizes evasion of alternative
labor service. However, conscientious objectors continued to maintain
that military control of the alternative labor service amounted to
unacceptable military service.

The Law on Education mandates that public schools offer a secular
education. Only personnel authorized and trained by the Government
may teach in public schools. Classes in religious history are part
of the public school curriculum and are taught by public school
teachers. The history of the Armenian Church is the basis of this
curriculum; many schools teach about world religions in elementary
school and the history of the Armenian Church in middle school. All
religious organizations may establish groups for religious instruction
to train their members, utilizing facilities belonging to or set aside
for them. The law grants the Armenian Church the right to organize
voluntary religious classes in state education institutions using
the facilities and resources of those institutions.

Restrictions on Religious Freedom

The Government generally did not enforce existing legal restrictions
on religious freedom. There was no change in the status of respect
for religious freedom by the Government during the period covered by
this report.

The Law on Freedom of Conscience and Religious Organizations prohibits
but does not define "proselytizing." The prohibition applies to all
groups, including the Armenian Church. Most registered religious
groups reported no significant legal impediments to their activities
during the reporting period.

Although the law prohibits foreign funding of foreign-based
denominations, the Government did not enforce the ban.

In May and June 2008, the progovernment Hayots Ashkhar and Golos
Armenii daily newspapers published anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic
accusations against former president and current opposition leader
Levon Ter-Petrossian. Local observers viewed the inflammatory articles
as attempts to portray the opposition leader as a traitor to the
country and stir up anti-Semitic sentiment in a country traditionally
known for its welcoming attitude toward Jews.

On June 1, 2008, the state-operated H1 public television channel
broadcast a 10-minute segment on its weekly 360 Degrees news magazine
program, the sole focus of which appeared to be to disparage and
undermine the opposition. The footage incorporated the anti-Semitic
and anti-Masonic attacks by Hayots Ashkhar and Golos Armenii.

On February 27, 2008, H1’s news program presented coverage of a
post-presidential election opposition rally, focusing primarily on
an Israeli flag–one of many nations’ flags in the crowd–with the
intention of vilifying Ter-Petrossian, whose wife is Jewish.

On May 15, 2008, a judge from Yerevan’s Shengavit community general
jurisdiction court invalidated the decision of the Guardianship
Board of Yerevan Davitashen community recommending that a member of
Jehovah’s Witnesses be deprived of her parental rights because of
her religious affiliation.

In April 2008 Jehovah’s Witnesses cleared shipments of religious
literature that in March 2007 customs officials had evaluated at a
significantly higher rate than the group expected by paying the full
price and took their case to the administrative court. At the end of
the reporting period, the court had not made a decision. Conscientious
objectors continued to face problems in obtaining necessary documents
from the military commissariat.

Abuses of Religious Freedom

Jehovah’s Witnesses complained that, compared with the prior reporting
period, the courts continued to hand down longer sentences for evasion
of alternative service. Between July 1, 2007, and June 30, 2008, of
the 36 Jehovah’s Witnesses sentenced, 19 received 30-month sentences
and 3 received 36-month sentences, the maximum allowed by law. The
remaining 14 received prison terms ranging between 22 and 27 months.

According to Jehovah’s Witnesses leaders in Yerevan, at the end of the
reporting period, 78 of their members remained in prison for refusal to
perform military service or alternative labor service on conscientious
and religious grounds. Representatives of Jehovah’s Witnesses stated
that all of the prisoners had been given the opportunity to serve
an alternative to military service rather than prison time but had
refused because the military continued to retain administrative control
over the alternative service. Other than Jehovah’s Witnesses who were
conscientious objectors, there were no reports of religious prisoners
or detainees in the country.

Forced Religious Conversion There were no reports of forced religious
conversion, including of minor U.S. citizens who had been abducted
or illegally removed from the United States, or of the refusal to
allow such citizens to be returned to the United States.

Section III. Societal Abuses and Discrimination

There were reports of societal abuses based on religious affiliation,
belief, or practice. Societal attitudes toward most minority religious
groups were ambivalent. While many citizens are not religiously
observant, the link between Armenian ethnicity and the Armenian Church
is strong.

According to some observers, the general population expressed
negative attitudes about minority religious groups, especially
Jehovah’s Witnesses, because of the latter’s refusal to serve in
the military, the group’s little-understood proselytizing practices,
and a widespread but unsubstantiated belief that Jehovah’s Witnesses
pay the desperately poor to convert. Minority religious groups at
times continued to be targets of hostile sermons by Armenian Church
clerics, and members of minority religious groups experienced societal
discrimination and intolerance.

On May 5, 2008, a member of Jehovah’s Witnesses filed a complaint
with the police, claiming that a man assaulted her and a fellow
member when she offered to engage him in Bible study. By the end of
the reporting period, the police had not acted on the complaint.

On February 21, 2008, Jehovah’s Witnesses reported that an alleged
Armenian Apostolic priest, Nver Melkonyan, physically assaulted a
member of their group in Sisian after the member offered to engage
in Bible study with him. The member of Jehovah’s Witnesses who was
attacked complained to the police, Prosecutor General, and Ombudsman,
requesting that the Government prosecute the assailant. The police
refused to initiate a criminal case, since Melkonyan refuted the
assault. Jehovah’s Witnesses reported that in July 2007 Melkonyan
had on different occasions attacked two other Jehovah’s Witnesses,
who did not file official complaints. The Armenian Church denied that
Melkonyan had any clerical affiliation with it.

On July 31, 2007, in Yerevan, an off-duty police major and his brother
allegedly beat a man who was a member of Jehovah’s Witnesses. The
man and his wife, who was a witness to the attack, filed complaints
with the police, Prosecutor’s Office, and human rights defender. The
police reportedly closed the case due to lack of evidence. Throughout
the reporting period, a group called One Nation Party placed posters
in Yerevan that denounced Jehovah’s Witnesses and called upon persons
to be aware of sects.

In the days prior to the February 2008 presidential election,
an anonymous antiopposition organization distributed a digital
video disk in Yerevan that used anti-Semitic claims, epithets, and
innuendo against Ter-Petrossian, the leading opposition candidate. The
allegations cast aspersions on the candidate’s Jewish wife and alleged
that the candidate was collaborating with the Israeli Government
and others in a "Zionist plot" to undermine the state. Some of the
contents of the digital video disk were shown on a private television
channel that has a national viewing audience. On December 17, 2007,
Jewish community members discovered a small swastika drawn on the
Hebrew side of the 14-month-old Joint Tragedies Memorial. The Jewish
community dismissed the incident as a random act.

Media outlets continued to label religious groups other than the
Armenian Church as "sects" in their broadcasting and transmitted
negative programs about them. Various television stations broadcast
discussions in which representatives of the Armenian Church and/or
other participants labeled religious minority groups as enemies of
the state and national unity.

Section IV. U.S. Government Policy T

he U.S. Government discusses religious freedom with the Government as
part of its overall policy to promote human rights. During the period
covered by this report, the U.S. Government emphasized to authorities
that continued eligibility for the Millennium Challenge Compact
remained contingent upon the Government’s performance in meeting
good governance indicators, which include standards of respect for
religious freedom.

U.S. embassy officials maintained close contact with the Catholicos
(primate of the Armenian Church) at Etchmiadzin and with leaders of
other religious and ecumenical groups in the country. The Embassy
maintained regular contact with resident and visiting regional
representatives of foreign-based religious groups and raised their
concerns with the Government when necessary. U.S. officials also
publicly condemned, and urged the Government to promptly end, the
anti-Semitic attacks on Ter-Petrossian and his wife by the state-run
H1 public television channel.

NKR: Andrey Nouikin

ANDREY NOUIKIN
Laura Grigoryan

Azat Artsakh Daily
19 Sep 08
Republic of Nagorno Karabakh [NKR]

Zory Balayan, expressing his opinion to the journalists about the
meeting, particularly said: "In soviet years such meetings were not
only traditions, but they took a practical turn. The friendship
begun in 1989-90-91 with russian intelligentsia today is still
being continued: bygone memories have remained, but we may say,
approaches, philosophy have been changed. In that case the anxiety of
the NKR President, that the collaboration is not so profitable, we may
understand". In his turn the chair of russian association of Armenian
friedship and collaboration Viktor Krivopuskov, trying to soften
the anxiety of the NKR leader, represented the novelties of russian
literature, which would favour the recognition of Nagorno-Karabakh,
particularly the works of Artsakh poets published in last number of
"Literaturnaya gazeta". The same day the guests met with the primate
of Artsakh diocese of Armenian Apostolic Church Pargev Martirosyan,
visited military units of the NKR Defence Army.

During our talk with the representative of russian intelligentsia,
the well-known publicist, the best friend of Artsakh Andrey Nouikin
other questions were also touched upon. – Mr Nouikin, the aim of
the recurrent visit to Artsakh. – I never miss the opportunity
for visiting once again Artsakh, an d as you see, I’m again in my
native land.Such short-term visits , of course don’t give practical
opportunities, they remind tradition much more, for what I’m here now.
– What questions have been discussed with NKR President? – They have
had to do with mainly the collaboration with creating intelligentsia.As
you know, in the stuff of our deligation many correspondents and
writers from russian different newspapers and periodicals have come ,
so such meetings pursue an aim of establishing relations with them,
deepening the collaboration and relations being before that. And a
form of deepening the relations will be the articles. which will be
published in russian press henceforth. – After the events taken place
in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, how does the russian intelligentsia
look at Karabakh problem? – Russian intelligentsia has followed
the conflict from the beginning, and has great expectations about
positive solution of the problem. we may say, that these expectations
are much, than Karabkhian people have. I think that Russia never lets
such tragic events take place in Nagorno-Karabakh. From the other
hand, we know well the power and possibilities of Karabakh army.
– Each time when you visit Artsakh, do you notice a progress? –
Of course. Each time there have been joyous circumstances, which
testify about the development and progress of the country: beauti
ful buildings, well-building streets…anyway, the progress of life
is noticeable. – What wishes can you send to Artsakh people? –
To be self-confident and keep high the spirit of ’88