EAFJD : Turkish Businessmen, Israel President Discuss Armenian Quest

TURKISH BUSINESSMEN, ISRAELI PRESIDENT DISCUSS ARMENIAN QUESTION

European Armenian Federation, Belgium
source: Anadolu Ajansi
Anatolia News Agency
Brussels, 9 September 2007

JERUSALEM (A.A) -A group of Turkish businessmen, who are currently
in Jerusalem to attend the sixth meeting of "Ankara Forum", were
received on Wednesday by Israeli President Shimon Peres.

Turkish businessmen, led by the Union of Chambers & Commodity Exchanges
of Turkey (TOBB) and Ankara Forum Chairman Rifat Hisarciklioglu,
voiced their complaints about the American Jewish organization
Anti-Defamation League (ADL) regarding its approach towards Armenian
question and incidents of 1915.

Abraham Foxman, the National Director of ADL, said earlier in a
statement that his organization had come to share the view that the
incidents of 1915 "were indeed tantamount to genocide," but added
that the organization maintained its opposition against bringing the
issue to Congressional floor.

Hisarciklioglu told Peres that domestic politics in USA grows in a way
that would harm relations between Turkey and the United States. He
said if the Armenian bill is adopted by the US Congress, relations
among some other countries would also come to harm.

"None of the laws can change history. History is for the
record. History can only be examined by historians," Peres replied.

Peres said that Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s
proposal is appropriate and that he supports this offer. Erdogan
earlier proposed to conduct a research by independent historians in
Ottoman archives on the incidents of 1915.

Hisarciklioglu also gave brief information to Peres about issues
discussed at Ankara Forum and their future projects in West Bank,
asking Peres to support their projects.

The sixth meeting of the "Ankara Forum", which brought together
representatives of Turkish, Israeli and Palestinian business world,
discussed Gaza industrial zone project and investments to be made in
West Bank.

Last meeting of the forum took place in Washington D.C. five months
ago.

Manuk Gasparyan: One Should Speak About Levon Ter-Petrosyan Only Aft

MANUK GASPARYAN: ONE SHOULD SPEAK ABOUT LEVON TER-PETROSYAN ONLY AFTER HIS STATEMENT TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT

arminfo
2007-09-06 17:38:00

ArmInfo. ‘It is already a month that the problem of ex-president
Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s running for president is being discussed
everywhere. But these talks will be relevant only if he himself
declares about his intentions’, – the leader of the Democratic Way
party Manuk Gasparyan told journalists in Pastarq club today.

He also added that the present authorities of Armenia managed even
to deteriorate the system, built at the time of Ter-Petrosyan’s
power. Just for this reason if 10 years ago nobody wanted to hear
about him, today 10% think about the prospect of his participation
in the forthcoming presidential election. Gasparyan again voiced his
position, according to which he will neither support nor hinder Levon
Ter-Petrosyan to run for president.

Au Plus =?unknown?q?Pr=E8S?= D’Istanbul: Rencontre Elif Shafak Peint

AU PLUS PRèS D’ISTANBUL: RENCONTRE ELIF SHAFAK PEINT UNE TURQUIE DOULOUREUSE ET VIVANTE

Le Monde
31 août 2007 vendredi
France

Une feministe, une femme voilee, une liberale, une adolescente
conservatrice, une gauchiste, une adepte soufie, et ainsi de suite " :
c’est la le public ideal d’Elif Shafak, mais c’est aussi, et surtout,
son public tout court. La blonde jeune femme sourit, ses yeux gris
brillants malgre la fatigue des voyages : rien ne la plonge dans un tel
ravissement que de voir se presser a Istanbul, autour de ses romans,
" ces gens qui ne partageraient pas un dîner ni rompraient le meme
pain, mais qui lisent le meme livre ".

Dans un pays " polarise " comme la Turquie, où les sujets
d’affrontement ne manquent pas sur le nationalisme et l’occidentalisme,
la laïcite et l’islam, la democratie ou l’influence de l’armee, et
sur le genocide armenien, cette gracile romancière, editorialiste et
universitaire reconnue de 36 ans, a le courage des nuances et parle
de reconciliation ; mieux, elle l’ecrit. Dans ses articles publies en
Turquie et a l’etranger, mais aussi dans ses romans, comme La Bâtarde
d’Istanbul, son sixième, qui la fait aujourd’hui connaître en France.

C’est un plaisir d’entrer dans ce roman, d’etre brutalement happe
dans le tumulte boueux d’un Istanbul detrempe, entre deux eclaircies,
pour ensuite se faire lessiver par l’energie orageuse de la famille
Kazanci, six femmes toujours aimantes, mais jamais d’accord, que ce
soit sur la politique, l’histoire, la religion ou le sexe. Presque
pas d’homme, père, fils ou mari, n’est sorti vivant de ces quatre
generations de Kazanci, tous precocement frappes par on ne sait quelle
malediction. Et quand, par un mariage imprevu, cet univers croise celui
des Tchakhmakhchian, une famille armenienne installee a San Francisco
depuis le genocide de 1915, pratiquement tous les conflits les plus
douloureux de la societe turque s’invitent dans le roman, et tombent
entre les mains des personnages : plus particulièrement entre celles de
deux adolescentes, Asya la " bâtarde ", la plus jeune des Kasanci, et
Armanouch, la cadette des Tchakhmakhchian, jeune Armenienne-Americaine
decouvrant avec Asya Istanbul et l’histoire de ses ancetres.

Machisme, censure officielle et tabou familial, occultation ou
oubli du genocide armenien, tous les maux d’une histoire refoulee
sont recueillis a la fois par la vitalite et l’ironie romanesques,
tracant leur sillon au coeur de chaque personnage tendrement moque,
et faconne dans les contradictions : " La tradition turque des
romanciers paternalistes, qui surplombent et regardent de haut
le texte, les personnages, le langage et les lecteurs, je veux la
remettre en question ", explique très lucidement Elif Shafak. " Je
questionne cette tradition cerebrale qui planifie tout, en prenant des
risques instinctifs avec l’intrigue et les personnages. Je deviens
moi-meme audacieuse, plus masculine quand j’ecris, pour renverser
cette autorite. "

A ses yeux, l’ecriture n’est pas l’exercice d’un contrôle vertical,
mais l’horizon ouvert d’une vie nomade, commencee auprès d’une mère
diplomate qui l’emmène, adolescente, en Espagne. Un nomadisme qu’elle
a poursuivi, entre l’Arizona, où elle enseignait encore recemment,
et Istanbul, mais qu’elle pratique aussi entre les savoirs et les
traditions : diplômee en women studies, docteur en sciences politiques,
visceralement attachee a l’existence d’une opinion publique critique
et democratique, Shafak se distingue pourtant de l’elite stambouliote
laïque influencee par l’heritage classique francais des Lumières,
qu’elle juge isolee dans sa tour d’ivoire, coupee de la diversite
culturelle populaire, et qu’elle brocarde sans langue de bois dans
son roman, en lui attribuant cette phrase : " Nous sommes un groupe
de citadins cultives entoures de ploucs et de pequenauds. "

Ce qui la fascine, c’est la pensee d’un Walter Benjamin qui " a
montre qu’on pouvait etre un liberal de gauche et s’interesser au
mysticisme ". Pour elle, ce sera le soufisme, cette pensee mystique
de l’islam, capable d’envisager la precarite et l’harmonie du monde,
la compassion et la colère divines, et d’inspirer les plus grands
poètes. Des poètes, oui, mais des romanciers ? " Le roman est un
genre jeune, et occidental, et le soufisme ancien. Mais c’est pour
cela que mon public est divers, que meme des conservateurs me lisent,
a cause de cette culture populaire que je prends en compte. "

Une culture, au vaste sens du terme : elle rassemble la generosite
de son univers romanesque, l’autoderision conquise entre le doute
et l’allegresse, la liberalite de sa langue accueillant des mots
anciens, d’origine perse, arabe, ottomane, ou bien troquant le turc
pour l’anglais, la quete de memoire pratiquee comme un desir assume de
construction personnelle ou collective. Dans son pays, où la fondation
de l’Etat laïque en 1923 a voulu remettre les compteurs et les memoires
a zero, cela lui a valu un procès, a la sortie de La Bâtarde d’Istanbul
(2006), a cause de l’evocation, par un de ses personnages armeniens,
du rôle des Turcs en 1915 : procès solde par un acquittement.

On lui reprocha aussi d’avoir ecrit le roman en anglais, quand les
quatre precedents l’etaient en turc : " Justement : l’autorite,
c’est la langue ", repond-elle. " Et choisir d’ecrire en anglais,
une langue que j’ai apprise, et non maternelle, c’etait prendre
conscience de tout ce que je ne savais pas dire. Affronter ce vide…

Pour un ecrivain, c’est toujours un defi ", dit-elle simplement,
en guise de conge.

Fabienne Dumontet

La Bâtarde d’Istanbul(The Bastard of Istanbul) d’Elif Shafak Traduit
de l’anglais (Turquie) par Aline Azoulay, Phebus, 318 p., 21,50 ¤.

–Boundary_(ID_LQYzfStomFSta12ftHYiWg)–

Parliament Delegations Set

PARLIAMENT DELEGATIONS SET

Panorama.am
20:31 28/08/2007

Parliamentary delegations have been named to take part in National
Assembly sessions for which several international organizations are
presently in Armenia.

National Assembly president Tigran Torosyan heads the main delegation.

As the Assembly’s press service told panorama.am, the delegation
included Seryoja Aprahamyan, of the Legal State party, the Assembly’s
vice-speaker, Ishkhan Zakaryan, of Prosperous Armenia, Ernest
Soghomonyan, also from Prosperous Armenia, Vardan Khachatryan, of
Heritage, Karen Karapetyan, from the Republic party, Hrayr Karapetyan
and Mikael Manukyan, from Dashnaktsutyun, and from the Republican
party Gagik Minasyan, Galust Sahakyan, Hermine Naghdalyan, Edvard
Sharmazanov, and Raffik Petrosyan.

At the NATO session the Armenian delegation will be headed by Artur
Aghabekyan, of Dashnaktsutyun. The delegation will also consist
of Karen Avagyan, of the Republican party, and Raffi Hovhannisian,
leader of Heritage.

At the Black Sea countries economic cooperation session, Armenia’s
delegation will be led by Gagik Minasyan. Melik Manukyan, of
Prosperous Armenia, is also in the delegation, as is Ara Nranyan,
of Dashnaktsutyun and Stepan Safaryan of Heritage.

Armenia Sold Its Loyalty Cheap

ARMENIA SOLD ITS LOYALTY CHEAP

Lragir, Armenia
Aug 27 2007

After the construction of Kars-Akhalkalaki railroad the
Kars-Gyumri railroad will become moot, and Armenia will have to join
Kars-Akhalkalaki-Tbilisi-Baku railroad to relieve its isolation. On
August 27 the president of the Union of Political Scientists Hmayak
Hovanisyan offered this evaluation at the Friday press club. He
views the issue in the context of Armenia’s stance on the Russian
and Georgian tensions.

"In its relations with Georgia Armenia was unable to sell its loyalty
expensive," Hmayak Hovanisyan says. According to him, it was necessary
to show to Georgia that Armenians display good faith and do not give
rise to a separatist movement in Javakheti, therefore Georgia must
refuse to join Kars-Akhalkalaki, which is not in Armenia’s interests.

Hmayak Hovanisyan says this program is already under implementation,
and the West only formally criticized it not to scare Armenia. Hmayak
Hovanisyan says if the United States hinted to Sahakashvili that
it is against the construction of Kars-Akhalkalaki, Georgia would
decline to join this project.

ADL Chairman Regrets For Putting Turks In Difficult Situation

ADL CHAIRMAN REGRETS FOR PUTTING TURKS IN DIFFICULT SITUATION

Noyan Tapan
Aug 27 2007

ANKARA, AUGUST 27, NOYAN TAPAN. Abraham Foxman, the Chairman of the
"Anti-Defamation League" (ADL) Jewish organization, expressed his
anxiety in connection with the discussions started as a result of the
change in the policy of the organization headed by him with regard
to the issue of the Armenian Genocide in his letter sent to Recep
Tayyip Erdogan, the Prime Minister of Turkey. This information was
provided by the Daily "Zaman".

"We have a great respect for you and the Turkish people. We have
never had a desire to put the Turkish people and its leaders in a
difficult situation.

We will go on looking for ways to strengthen our relations. We are
sorry that the recent discussions have brought forth a strain in our
friendly relations," is mentioned in the letter of Abraham Foxman
addressed to the Prime Minister of Turkey on August 24.

4th Pan Armenian Games Draw To Their End

4TH PAN ARMENIAN GAMES DRAW TO THEIR END

Panorama.am
14:40 27/08/2007

The official closing ceremony of the 4th Pan Armenian games took
place at the Academic Theater of Opera and Ballet after Alexander
Spendaryan yesterday. The team from Yerevan is leading in number
of medals followed by Vanadzor and Glendale. Prime Minister Serzh
Sargsyan gave flowers to girls participating in the games in addition
to making awards to the winners.

Gayane Tunyan, a tennis player from Yerevan, won the title of Miss
Pan Armenian Games. The ceremony closed with a concert at the Freedom
Square with participation of Armenian pop stars.

The 4th Pan Armenian Games kicked off on August 18.

Delegations of sportsmen from ninety four countries took part in the
games this year. The state released eight million Armenian drams to
the aim. The fifth Pan Armenian Games will take place in 2011.

UCLA Professor Richard Hovannisian in Summer Conferences

PRESS RELEASE–April 27, 2007
UCLA AEF Chair in Armenian History
Contact: Prof. Richard Hovannisian
Contact: Meg Sullivan, [email protected]
Tel: 310-825-1046

Professor Richard Hovannisian in Summer Conferences

During the summer months, Professor Richard Hovannisian, AEF Chair in
Armenian History at UCLA, has continued his active schedule of
conferences and presentations relating to Armenian history and issues.

Dr. Hovannisian gave the opening address at an international symposium
on the history of Shushi, which was held under the auspices of Yerevan
State University, Armenian National Academy of Sciences, and the
Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Mountainous Karabagh. The
meetings were held in the Music Academy of Shushi and at Artsakh State
University in Stepanakert, June 20-24, 2007. In his paper, Hovannisian
focused on the relevance of Shushi in Armenian history, with particular
reference to the modern period and the lessons to be learned from the
struggle for Karabagh in the years of the first Armenian republic.
Hovannisian was a part of a small delegation to meet with outgoing
Karabagh President Arkady Gukasyan. Professor Kevork Bardakjian of the
University of Michigan-Ann Arbor also attended the conference and
presented a paper on prominent literary figures of Shushi.

Immediately upon his return to Los Angeles at the end of June, Richard
Hovannisian took part in a week-long Facing History summer institute on
ways and means to teach about the Armenian Genocide. Teachers from
across the United States had come to Antioch College in Los Angeles to
gain further training on implementation of the Facing History resource
book titled Crimes Against Humanity and Civilization: Genocide of the
Armenians. Professor Hovannisian shared with the teachers his experience
in teaching about the Armenian Genocide and about genocide in
comparative perspective within the parameters of the Facing History
program

Dr. Hovannisian then traveled to Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina, to
participate in the Seventh Bienniel Meeting of the International
Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS), July 9-13. A number of
participants specializing in various aspects of the Armenian Genocide
were present for the conference: Haig Demoyan and Tigran Sarukhanyan
from Armenia; Herve Georgelin and Sevane Garibian from France; Carlos
Antaramian fromMexico, Ani Degirmencioglu from Turkey and Austria; and
Peter Balakian, Annie Kalaydjian, Ed Maljian, Arsen Marsoobian, Rubina
Peroomian, and Hasmig Tatiossian from the United States.

The IAGS honored Ambassador John Evans with the Raoul Wallenberg Award
"for speaking out when diplomats are expected to remain silent and for
calling upon the United States Government to recognize the Armenian
Genocide." Ambassador Evans gave a powerful affirmation of his position
on the Armenian Genocide and crimes against humanity. Rajib Zarakoglu
recived the IAGS Award "for combating denial of the Armenian Genocide
and all genocides."

Richard Hovannisian’s conference presentation focused on the new wave of
genocide denial, with particular reference to the recent publication of
Guenther Lewy’s The Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey: A Disputed
Genocide, issued by the University of Utah Press, along with Justin
McCarthy’s The Armenian Rebellion at Van. He pointed to Lewy’s clever
but highly flawed methodology and claims of objectivity disguised under
a false veneer of deconstructing and discounting the primary sources
relating to the Armenian Genocide. In Hovannisian’s earlier discussion
on the subject at the University of Utah, the school newspaper, The
Daily Utah Chronicle, ran a feature article on this issue.

Back in Los Angeles, Professor Hovannisian joined Dr. Kevork Keshishian,
Mrs. Janet Kassouni, Dr. Vicken Aharonian, Mr. Panos Titizian,
Archbishop Hovnan Derderian, and the community at the AGBU Manoogian
Center in Pasadena on August 17 in paying tribute to Dr. Haig Messerlian
for his decades of dedicated service to education and historical
research. Messerlian, the long-time principal of the Evangelical High
School in Beirut, is also the author of several important monographs on
modern Armenian history.

Coinciding with the beginning of a new academic year at UCLA, Richard
Hovannisian’s final summer engagement will be on September 29 as the
keynote speaker at the first banquet of the Alumni and Friends of the
Armenian Studies Program at California State University, Northridge.
There, Richard Hovannisian will address the subject, "Links and Gaps in
Modern Armenian History."

END

Did Abraham Foxman Acknowledge the Armenian Genocide?

Did Abraham Foxman Acknowledge the Armenian Genocide?
Joey Kurtzman <;,
A ugust 22, 2007
TAGS: Abraham Foxman <; anti-defamation
league < ue> Armenian
Genocide< enian_genocide>

Did Abraham Foxman acknowledge the Armenian Genocide, or reword his denial?

Yesterday I noted my puzzlement
< braham_foxman_meets_with_elie_wiesel_sees_error_of _his_ways_sort_of>
at the convoluted ways that the ADL statement
< 5114_00.htm> seemed to affirm the
genocide without ever explicitly stating that, yes, this was a
genocide.

Turns out I wasn’t the only one that found it odd.

FresnoZionism, "a pro-Israel voice from California’s Central Valley,"
supports the ADL and criticized
< 88> my Fire Foxman
< /fire_foxman> article, but
he’s flabbergasted <; by this
"truly remarkable" excerpt from the ADL statement:

…On reflection, we have come to share the view of Henry Morgenthau,
Sr. that the consequences of those actions were indeed tantamount to
genocide. If the word genocide had existed then, they would have
called it genocide. [FresnoZionism’s emphasis]

He then asks,

Does Mr. Foxman think he is writing some kind of international treaty
whose language must be creatively ambiguous?

What he should be saying is that the ADL was wrong in not applying the
word ‘genocide’ to the aforesaid events, which in fact were a
genocide committed by the Ottoman Empire. It would have been much
easier to write than the tortured prose above, which is not going to
win him a lot of friends among either Turks, Armenians, or Jews who
understand the importance of calling genocide by its name.

Hrag Vartanian, too, wonders
< l-take-first-step-to-full-armenian-genocide-recogn ition/>,
" why say "tantamount to genocide" and not just say it was genocide?"

And Chris Helms, editor of the Watertown TAB & Press,
says< wn/?p=3D4451>,

Forgive me, but the latest turn in the Anti-Defamation League story has me
thoroughly confused=85[I]f you read the actual statement
< _00.htm> of the ADL’s director, it only
says the "consequences" of the Ottoman Turks’ actions were "tantamount to
genocide."

I’m still holding out for Abe Foxman to say "the deaths of 1.5 million
Armenians under the Ottoman Empire were genocide."

Someone from the ADL then wrote to Helms and said "’genocide" is "genocide"
and that Helms is "trying to make much too much out of syntax that simply is
meant to provide historical context=85"

Yesterday I assumed the "tortured prose" of the statement was just typical
committee-crafted garble. But phrases such as "the consequences of [Turkish]
actions were indeed tantamount to genocide" now look depressingly fishy and
deliberate to me. Not only do we not get "It was a genocide," or even "the
consequences of Turkish actions amounted to genocide," but only that the
"consequences" of [Turkish] actions were "tantamount" to genocide.

Hasn’t it been a consistent position of deniers that the vast number of
Armenian deaths were an unplanned outcome of war? And that though Turkish
military actions may have led to a large number of Armenian deaths, there
was no genocide because there was no intention or centralized plan to
destroy the Armenian people? So to say that the Turkish actions during the
war had "consequences" that were "tantamount" to genocide reads=85well,
doesn’t it read rather like an elaborate restatement of the position that
the Turks’ military campaigns had the consequence of devastating the
Armenians in Ottoman territory–a catastrophe, but not an intentional one
and not actually a genocide?

Interested to hear others’ take on this. Two activists from Watertown tell
me they think I got it right. Regardless, I’m with FresnoZionism.
Yesterday’s statement was "truly remarkable." I can’t imagine a more
Byzantine way to say,

In light of the recent controversy, I have revisited my position on the the
tragedy that befell the Armenians from 1915-1923. I have consulted with my
friend and mentor Nobel Laureate Elie Wiesel and other respected historians,
and I now acknowledge that the deaths of over a million Armenians under the
Ottoman Empire constituted genocide.

UPDATES ON THIS ISSUE:
The Newton TAB, local newspaper of Massachussussetts town considering
breaking with ADL’s No Place for Hate program, publishes
editorial< ewton/opinions/x875775732>denying
that Foxman has acknowledged Armenian Genocide. "Foxman is playing
political games."
As of morning of Thursday, August 23, most media (including
this< l/articles/2007/08/23/genocide_debate_has_local_fa llout/>Globe
article) seem to have addressed the issue by just quoting the words
"tantamount to genocide," rather than asserting that he acknowledged the
genocide.

Source: _strange_letter

http://www.jewcy.com/user/joey_kurtzman&gt
http://www.jewcy.com/tags/abraham_foxman&gt
http://www.jewcy.com/tags/anti_defamation_leag
http://www.jewcy.com/tags/arm
http://www.jewcy.com/daily_shvitz/a
http://www.adl.org/PresRele/Mise_00/
http://fresnozionism.org/archives/5
http://www.jewcy.com/feature/2007-07-09
http://fresnozionism.org/archives/602&gt
http://hragvartanian.com/2007/08/22/ad
http://blogs.townonline.com/waterto
http://adl.org/PresRele/Mise_00/5114
http://www.townonline.com/n
http://www.boston.com/news/loca
http://www.jewcy.com/daily_shvitz/abraham_foxman_s

Edward Aghabekyan Hasn’t Decided To Run For The Post Of Mayor

EDWARD AGHABEKYAN HASN’T DECIDED TO RUN FOR THE POST OF MAYOR

KarabakhOpen
24-08-2007 18:07:55

According to the decision of the NKR government, on October 14 local
elections will be held in NKR.

In answer to our question whether the mayor of Stepanakert Edward
Aghabekyan will run in the election, he said: "I cannot tell you
anything now because the conference of the party must discuss this
issue."

By the way, Edward Aghabekyan was elected mayor as the chair of the
opposition party Movement 88. However, in the election of July 19 the
political party on behalf of its leader supported the president elect.