2006 State Budgetary Expenditures On State Services Of General Chara

2006 STATE BUDGETARY EXPENDITURES ON STATE SERVICES OF GENERAL CHARACTER MAKE 49.9 BLN DRAMS

Noyan Tapan
Sep 4, 2007

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 4, NOYAN TAPAN. Issues related to financing
of state, local government and judicial bodies of the report on
execution of the RA Law on the 2006 RA State Budget were discussed at
the September 4 joint sitting of the RA National Assembly standing
committees. According to the governmental report, expenditures on
state sevices of general character made 49.9 bln drams (about 120
mln USD), ensuring a 92.9% execution of the program. The deviation
from the program is mainly explained by the low execution indices of
credit and grant programs implemented with foreign assistance.

The expenditures of the legislative body and the state governance
expenditures amounted to over 9.9 bln drams in the period under review
or 98.5% of envisaged expenditures. These expenditures grew by 27.5%
on 2005, which is mainly conditioned by an increase in expenditures on
salaries, as well as on purchase of property, services and equipment.

330 mln drams was allocated for construction of a new NA subsidiary
building as an expenditure on construction of administrative
objects. 62 mln drams additionally allocated from the government’s 2006
reserve fund was spent for the same purpose. 1.1 bln drams allocated
for major repairs of administrative objects was spent on major
repairs of the administrative buildings of the presidential staff,
the government’s subsidiary buildings, the government’s reception
house, and the administrative buildings of the Armavir and Vayots
Dzor regional administrations.

According to the head of the NA staff Hayk Kotanian, the expenditures
on maintenance of the NA were envisaged in the amount of 2.1 bln
drams. The fulfilment index made 99.99%. About 81 mln drams of this
sum was allocated for expenses related to membership of international
parliamentary organizations.

American University Of Armenia Implements Program Of Development Of

AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA IMPLEMENTS PROGRAM OF DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL REGIONS IN ARMENIA AND NKR

ARKA News Agency
Sept 3 2007
Armenia

YEREVAN, September 3. /ARKA/. The American University of Armenia
(AUA) implements an education program totaling $5mln in Armenia and
Nagorno-Karabakh directed to the development of rural regions.

AUA President Haroutiun Armenyan told reporters on Monday that the
five-year program started in 2006 is directed to the improvement of
economic conditions of inhabitants of one NKR village and two regions
in Armenia – Shirak and Tavush.

He said that the project envisages implementation of various
subprograms, but its main direction is to draw middle-aged people
into business.

"It is a priority issue for us to grant an opportunity to middle-aged
generation to learn the rules of conducting business by means of
modern technologies and information sources, that they lacked when
getting their basic education," he said.

Armenyan noted that inhabitants of rural regions will be suggested
drawing business plans on the bases of which the AUA will select the
beneficiaries of the project.

"The short-listed participants will be held within the AUA business
courses for businessmen, and during these courses they will be provided
detailed information on the basics and mechanisms of implementing
business activities," he said.

The AUA President expressed hope that due to this program the economic
effectiveness of business activities in the rural regions of Armenia
and the NKR will significantly increase.

The idea to form an American University in Armenia occurred in 1989.

The AUA started operating in Armenia in 1991. The founders of
the University are the RA Government, Californian University and
All-Armenian charitable union.

During the 16-year operation of the university, its annual budget
makes $2.5mln.

The Regular Barefaced Lie

THE REGULAR BAREFACED LIE

Hayots Ashkharh Daily
Aug 31 2007
Armenia

Or The Result Of Some People’s Imagination

Yesterday one of the newspapers reported that Prime Minister Serge
Sargsyan has punished RPA vice-Chair Razmik Zohrabyan for visiting
Levon Ter-Petrosyan, by taking away his "Jeep", which the party had
given to R. Zohrabyan.

Commenting on this Mass Media falsehood Razmik Zohrabyan said," This
information is the result of the imagination of "Jamanak Yerevan"
newspaper. The car that was given to the party after the elections
to solve different issues is at my disposal at the moment.

As for the "meeting" with Levon Ter-Petrosyan, I met him last in
1996, when the Republican Party, in the number of "Republic" union
and other parties has nominated Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s candidacy to
presidency and as member of RPA council, I was present at the meeting
with him. From that day haven’t had any contact and haven’t discussed
any issue with Levon Ter-Petrosyan.

Because the issue of Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s return is speculated these
days and there are rumors that some RPA members are ready to unite
with him I must assure you this information is also the result of
some people’s imagination.

Electricity Is Installed In Kashatagh Region

ELECTRICITY IS INSTALLED IN KASHATAGH REGION

KarabakhOpen
31-08-2007 10:59:31

Electricity is being installed in the village of Mkhents of the
region of Kashatagh. They started a few days ago to lay out a 0.4 kW
transmission line. The project costs 11 million 237 thousand drams,
the length of the line is 4.5 km.

In September the 22 households of the village will have electricity.

Asia: Russia’s Uranium Enrichment Center Wins International Support

ASIA: RUSSIA’S URANIUM ENRICHMENT CENTER WINS INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT
By Akiyoshi Komaki, The Asahi Shimbun

Asahi Shimbun, Japan
Aug 30 2007

ANGARSK, Russia–The Russian government plans to set up an
international center here to enrich uranium for nuclear power plants
in foreign countries.

The center, to be established in the premises of the Angarsk
Electrolysis Chemical Complex in eastern Siberia, is expected to
prevent the proliferation of nuclear technologies to countries that
do not have them.

Recently, Japanese reporters were allowed to see the inside of the
50-year-old complex for the first time.

Several facilities dot the complex’s 8-hectare premises, which are
located near Lake Baikal and covered with birch and pine trees. A
huge portrait of Vladimir Lenin (1870-1924) is posted on the wall of
one of the brick buildings.

Visitors need to go through checkpoints to get to the site. Even in
the compound, the Ministry of Internal Affairs has stationed armed
guards at several locations.

Japanese reporters were permitted to enter one of the facilities,
the Central Laboratory, in which engineers measure and control the
qualities of various materials produced in the process of uranium
enrichment.

The inside of the laboratory has a modern atmosphere which is
unimaginable from the external appearance of the old building.

State-of-the-art facilities, which are well air-conditioned, are
lined up on both sides of the corridors.

The Japanese reporters accompanied Sergei Kiriyenko, chief of the
Russian Atomic Energy Agency (RosAtom), on his visit there. In the
compound, Kiriyenko attended a ceremony to sign an agreement with
local municipalities for the opening of the international center for
uranium enrichment.

The Japanese reporters were not allowed to enter a building for
uranium enrichment–a key facility in the complex. By accepting them
in the central laboratory, however, the Russian government apparently
tried to show to the world that the international center is open to
foreign countries.

"Russia voluntarily decided to put this center under the inspection of
the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). It is an unprecedented
decision," Kiriyenko said.

Russia, the United States, China, Britain and France, the five
countries which are recognized as nuclear powers under the Nuclear
Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), are not obliged to accept IAEA
inspections.

However, the four countries except for Russia have voluntarily
accepted IAEA inspections to their nuclear facilities except for
those for military purposes.

The prime reason Russia has refused inspections is that, since
the days of the Soviet Union, its nuclear facilities have not been
separated clearly between those for military purposes and those for
non-military purposes. All of the facilities have been placed under
strict controls as military secrets.

The Angarsk chemical complex was previously used to enrich uranium
for nuclear weapons. However, in order to establish the international
center that is open to the world, the Russian government decided to
accept the IAEA inspections for the first time.

"All quality controls in the center will be conducted in accordance
with the U.S. standards," said Victor Krivov, vice director of the
central laboratory. By saying so, he emphasized that the international
center will meet global standards.

He added that Russian government officials had already held a meeting
with IAEA officials for the inspections.

The plan to establish the international center was announced by Russian
President Vladimir Putin in January 2006. The idea of enriching uranium
for nuclear power plants in foreign countries resulted from Russia’s
cooperation with the Bushehr plant in Iran whose nuclear development
program is causing a concern around the world.

In the idea, Russia will first set up joint ventures with countries
which want to develop nuclear powers, and then enrich uranium. The
enriched uranium will be used as nuclear fuels in the plants in
those countries.

Russia will never disclose information on uranium enrichment
technologies to those countries. By refusing the disclosure, Russia
will prevent the proliferation of nuclear technologies to them.

A Russian expert said, "The plan (to set up the international center)
will meet two requirements. One is the growing demand for nuclear
power and the other is nuclear nonproliferation."

Former Soviet republic Kazakhstan, which has the second-largest
uranium reserve following Australia, has already decided to join the
international center. Ukraine is also expected to agree with Russia to
a joint project by the end of this year. Besides, Armenia is showing
interest in the international center.

India, which is constructing nuclear power plants in cooperation
with Russia, is also a candidate to join the international center. In
addition, Iran and North Korea could expand or start cooperation with
Russia through the center if their nuclear problems are resolved.

The United States, which places much importance on nuclear
nonproliferation, also supports Russia’s project of setting up the
international center. The project is one of a few policies for which
Russia wins support from international society.

Meanwhile, Russia’s nuclear industry has a huge structural problem.

Though it has sufficient uranium enrichment abilities, it can dig
out only about 3,300 tons of natural uranium a year. The figure is
much less than the country’s annual total demand of 20,500 tons for
domestic use and exports.

In order to supplement the shortage, Russia is not only using its
stocks but also importing uranium.

In such circumstances, Russia has started to realign the domestic
nuclear power industry on a large scale. Last month, the government
established a state-run holding company, Atomenergoprom, which controls
all the affiliated companies for non-military purposes–from those for
uranium mining to those for the construction of nuclear power plants.

By putting the entire nuclear power industry under the direct control
of Putin, the government is trying to strengthen its international
competitiveness.

The ongoing rise in the price of uranium, which results from increasing
global demand for nuclear power generation, is also leading Russia
to reform its nuclear policies.

The primary index of the uranium price–the price of triuranium
octaoxide (U3O8) per pound (about 454 grams)–sharply increased
from $7 (815 yen) in 2000 to $136 (15,837 yen) in June this year,
according to a survey of Ux Consulting Co.

Russia plans to build 26 new nuclear power plants for itself in the
next 12 years and raise the nuclear power ratio in the total energy
production from the current 15 percent to 30 percent.

By setting up the international center, the government is trying to
strengthen the highly lucrative processing division in which uranium
will be processed into nuclear fuels. At the same time, the government
is trying to attract more investment in the domestic uranium mining
sector by realigning the nuclear power industry.

Meanwhile, Japan is welcoming the Russian plan of setting up the
center.

"We will be able to increase the countries to which we can entrust
uranium enrichment," said a senior official of the Japanese Ministry
of Economy, Trade and Industry.

Presently Japan is storing uranium, which has been collected from
spent nuclear fuels, in Britain and France. However, Japan can entrust
re-enrichment of the collected uranium only to France.

Therefore, the Japanese nuclear industry has been forced to pay
extravagant fees to France for re-enrichment, the senior official said.

As for the enrichment of natural uranium, a facility in the village
of Rokkasho in Aomori Prefecture is able to meet only several percent
of the entire domestic demand for enrichment.

If Japan can also entrust re-enrichment to Russia, it could reduce
fees paid to France. The Japanese electric power industry has already
started to consider entrusting the re-enrichment of collected uranium
to Russia.

In order to realize the plan, however, Japan must conclude a bilateral
agreement with Russia.

"All of the preparations for signing the agreement will be completed
within this year if there are political wills in both countries,"
Kiriyenko said.

However, some Japanese government officials are cautious of the plan of
entrusting re-enrichment to Russia, as Russia has not separated nuclear
facilities for military purposes from those for non-military purposes.

The key issue is how Japan can obtain an assurance that Russia never
use Japanese nuclear technologies and related materials for military
purposes. Russia is requesting Japan’s understanding by accepting
IAEA inspections into the enrichment facilities in Angarsk.

However, a senior official of the Japanese Foreign Ministry said,
"Even if Russia accepts the international inspections on some part
of the facilities, the acceptance will not assure that Russia will
not convert Japan’s nuclear technologies for military purposes."

Japan has held meetings with Russia twice. However, the Japanese
Foreign Ministry official said, "The gap of views between the two
countries is very big."

As for Russia’s hope for signing of the agreement this year, the
official added, "It’s almost impossible."

* * *

Yusuke Murayama in Tokyo contributed to this article.(IHT/Asahi:
August 30,2007)

Opinion – Lebanon: Damascus 1 – Washington 0

OPINION – LEBANON: DAMASCUS 1 – WASHINGTON 0
By Alain-Michel Ayache

The Suburban, Canada
2291511422603794128982431&ctid=1000002&cni d=1012595
Aug 29 2007

It was obvious! The victory of Dr. Kamil Khoury, General Michel Aoun’s
candidate, over his competitor Amin Gemayel, former president of the
Lebanese Republic, was foreseeable. What was not, was the difference
in votes which carried the Aoun Front Patriotic Movement’s candidate
towards victory.

Indeed, the 418 votes which separate Khoury from Gemayel are indicative
on more than one level. The first being proof once again that Aoun
still has supporters in the Christian areas. Second, that he lost
the majority of them as one can deduct from these results.

>From the 70 percent of Christian votes, Maronites in particular
who supported him during the last national legislative elections,
a minor percentage remains in his favour!

This loss of popularity in the Christian camp finds its origin
in the alliance the General made with Hizballah and Syria during
his 15 years of exile in France- he represented for the Christians
Maronites in particular the spearhead of Lebanese nationalism and "
anti-Syrianism." However, since his return to Lebanon in 2005, and
in the name of a "national union," he multiplied political errors
while betting on the wrong players…

His detractors, forming the current majority of the Lebanese
government, are criticizing his political stands and his alignment
on the Syrian policy against the interests of Lebanon. Aoun however
defends the position of the presidency of the Republic. A main
position which he seeks to occupy under the pretext of consolidating
the presidential powers vis-a-vis an extremely centralizing Sunni
Prime Minister. A government that he considers as being a carbon copy
of that under the Syrian occupation, mainly because the majority of
the ministers in question were Syrian allies at that time. However,
if this "safeguard" of the presidential position is considered to
be important by the Lebanese Church, it is nonetheless clear that
the General is more than ever perceived today by Christians and the
clergy as an inappropriate person to fill it.

The Maronite Patriarch sought at several times to close the breach
between Aoun and Gemayel, but lamentably failed, mainly because of
Aoun’s stubbornness, his personality and his lack of respect for the
Gemayel family. That aggressive attitude was translated more than
once throughout Aoun’s televised declarations whose level of respect
against Gemayel approached more the level of a Syrian Moukhabarat
agent rather than one of a General of the military Establishment,
or even of a person aspiring to the supreme office in the country!

One realizes that the voices which brought Aoun’s candidate to victory
are mainly those of the Armenian camp, although only partly.

The FPM also got the full support of the pro-Syrian Progressive
Social National Party, closely tied to Damascus and depending on
Syrian funds. Aoun’s candidate also benefited from the votes of the
"naturalized" Lebanese who came from Damascus by buses "to fulfill
their civic rights".

Of course, a part of the Christians have also voted for the Aounist
candidate. They are the followers of Michel Murr, former Minister
of Interior and vice Prime Minister under the Syrian occupation
of Lebanon.

Ironically, Michel Murr’s son abstained from electing any of the
candidates. He is the current Minister of Defence and had been a
victim of an assassination attempt by the same people who killed
former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri.

For the observers and analysts of the Lebanese political scene, the
success of the Aoun "Patriotic Current" (Tayyar) in these by-elections
shows the capacity of the latter to obstruct the government’s
plans for Lebanon. A government he sees as unconstitutional and
non-representative of the will of the Lebanese people. However, these
results are only the preview of the electoral "fight" to come that
Christians in particular will have to carry out for the presidency
of the Republic. The candidacy of Michel Aoun for the presidency of
the Lebanese Second Republic, although announced, will undoubtedly
not receive any support from the Christian population that it is
supposed to represent. The major problem for the Maronites becomes
then, finding an acceptable alternative to Aoun.

Right now the American analysts think that the presidency of the
Republic will form the next round of the continuous bras de fer
between the American administration and Damascus.

However, Washington seems to have taken the initiative after this
"victory" of Aoun over the Siniora government by announcing the
blocking and seizing of all the accounts of American citizens and
known American companies that granted financial support to General
Aoun. Thus, and until the next presidential elections which should
take place at the end of September, the two camps seem to be ready
for one of the hottest autumns in Lebanon. Some are even speaking of
armed confrontations based on the continuous rearmament of Syria’s
allies in Lebanon…

Alain-Michel Ayache is a Middle East expert and teaches in the
Department of Political Science at the University of Quebec in
Montreal.

http://thesuburban.com/content.jsp?sid=9047

ADL New England Director Reinstated

ADL NEW ENGLAND DIRECTOR REINSTATED

Jewish Telegraphic Agency, NY
.html
Aug 27 2007

The Anti-Defamation League has reinstated Andrew Tarsy as its New
England regional director.

An ADL spokesman confirmed Monday that Tarsy would be rehired,
effective immediately. Tarsy was fired Aug. 17 after publicly breaking
ranks with the organization for its refusal to recognize the Armenian
genocide.

Abraham Foxman, the ADL’s national director, subsequently reversed
himself last week, issuing a statement calling the World War I
massacres of Armenians "tantamount to genocide."

Tarsy’s firing set off a mutiny in the New England region, one the
ADL’s most active and influential. The regional board called on Foxman
not only to rehire Tarsy, but to support a resolution in Congress
that would recognize the genocide. Foxman continues to oppose the
resolution.

http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/103840

Turkish Prime Minister says ADL [Anti-Defamation League] will recall

TURKISH PRIME MINISTER SAYS ADL [ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE] WILL RECALL ITS FORMER STATEMENT ON POSSIBLE RECOGNITION OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

arminfo
2007-08-27 13:36:00

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, stating that the Jewish lobby
in the United States, the ADL [Anti-Defamation League], which was
reported to have changed its stance regarding the 1915 Armenian
incidents, has sent a message to the Office of the prime minister,
said that the false step made previously has been retracted with
this statement. Erdogan said: ‘The indicated that, just as they have
provided all the support they could until now, they will provide it
in the future as well,’Anatolia news agency reports.

Erdogan, after casting his vote in the second round of the presidential
election, was questioned by journalists in the corridors: ‘You spoke
with [Israeli President] Shimon Perez. There are reports that the
Jewish lobby in America has taken a step backwards; what are the
developments in this regard?’ Stating that the text with the ADL’s
written message had come, he said: ‘They said that they share our
sensitivities in particular on account of this statement regarding us,
and they expressed the mistake they had made in the written fax they
sent us.’

Erdogan, pointing out that he has to date suggested to Armenia
that the topic be studied by a commission comprised of historians,
archaeologists, and political scientists, and that politicians sit
together and work on this, noted that Armenia has not responded to him
on this matter. Erdogan said: ‘They [the ADL] indicate that they agree
with this as well. On account of this, they expressed their regret.’

In response to a question, Erdogan stated that a fax had come from
the ADL.

Asked ‘are they going to declare this to the world, or will it just
be limited to a fax coming to the Office of the prime minister?’,
he said: ‘No. It has already been posted on their own [web]site.’ In
response to the question ‘did they fax to you what is on the site?’,
Erdogan said ‘I do not know the one on their site, but there is a
fax that came to the Office of the prime minister.’

Armenian `genocide’ mission sparks dispute

Jewish Chronicle , UK
Aug 24 2007

Armenian `genocide’ mission sparks dispute

24/08/2007
By Bernard Josephs

A British Liberal rabbi is to travel to Armenia to pay tribute to the
victims of the Armenian genocide carried out by the Ottoman Turks,
despite fears expressed by Jewish leaders that his plan could
complicate relations between Israel and Turkey.

Rabbi Danny Rich, chief executive of Liberal Judaism, told the JC he
had called on Chief Rabbi Sir Jonathan Sacks, the Reform Movement and
the Board of Deputies to send representatives on the trip next week,
during which he plans to plant a tree at the genocide memorial in the
Armenian capital of Yerevan.

However, he said he had received no response.

A source, whom he declined to name, `warned me off, saying I should
not be asking people to come with me because of the situation between
Israel and Turkey’. Turkey – one of Israel’s closest allies in the
Middle East – is known to be acutely sensitive about the Armenian
massacre, in which over one million people were slaughtered around
the time of the First World War.

`It would have been better if the Jewish community as a whole had
been represented: instead I will be taking a small group from the
Liberal Synagogue. The Armenian genocide was horrific. By 1923,
virtually the entire Armenian population of Anatolian Turkey had been
`cleansed’. Jewish history reminds us of the importance of
remembrance, and the ethical imperative of Judaism says that the pain
of one people ought to be the tragedy of all peoples.’

A spokesperson for the Chief Rabbi denied any knowledge of Rabbi
Rich’s initiative. Reform’s Rabbi Tony Bayfield said he was `very
sympathetic’ to the move, but added: `There are complex political
issues relating to Israel and its relations with Turkey. I would be
loath to do anything without the support of the Board of Deputies.’
Board president Henry Grunwald said he too was aware of political
considerations but hoped the visit would `go very well’. A row over
whether or not the Armenian deaths should be categorised as genocide
erupted this week when the New York-based Anti-Defamation League
fired one of its directors, Andrew Tarsy, for backing a Congressional
resolution on the subject. Later, Abe Foxman, national director of
the ADL, reversed the position and said he did believe that a
genocide had taken place – but Mr Tarsy still lost his job.

mp;SecId=18&AId=54822&ATypeId=1

http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m11s18&a

Gul Won the Second Round of Presidential Elections

AZG Armenian Daily #153, 25/08/2007

Elections in Turkey

GUL WON THE SECOND ROUND OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

On August 23 took place the second round of presidential elections at
the Milli Meclis, the National Assembly of Turkey. Abdullah Gul, the
candidate of the ruling "Justice and Prosperity" party earned 341
votes in the first round, and the candidates of the "National
Movement" and "Left Democratic" parties earned 71 and 14 votes
respectively.

446 of 550 deputies of the Parliament of Turkey took part in the
voting process. 24 votes were accounted invalid. It is expected that
in result of the third round, on which 276 votes are enough to win,
Abdullah Gul will become the 11th president of the Republic of Turkey.

By H. Chaqrian