PACE Seeks To Relaunch Discussions On Frozen Conflicts In Europe

PACE SEEKS TO RELAUNCH DISCUSSIONS ON FROZEN CONFLICTS IN EUROPE

armradio.am
31.10.2007 16:36

The Monitoring Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council
of Europe (PACE), which seeks to enforce the honouring of obligations
and commitments by the Council’s member states, will be holding a
hearing on "frozen conflicts" in cooperation with the German Institute
for International and Security Affairs (SWP), at the Bundestag
in Berlin on 5 and 6 November 2007, focusing on the situations in
Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transnistria.

On joining the Council of Europe, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and
Moldova undertook to seek peaceful settlements to these conflicts,
and the Russian Federation has also entered into specific commitments
regarding certain of these regions.

The hearing has the twofold objective of bringing together leading
experts and government ministers to take stock of the current situation
with regard to each of these conflicts and of initiating a debate on
the Council of Europe’s future role in the conflict settlement process.

On the first day the hearing will take the form of an exchange of views
between the committee’s members and experts (historians, researchers,
international legal specialists, think tank representatives) and will
help clarify the positions of the parties to the conflicts through
discussion of the established facts.

The following day will be devoted to discussions with senior government
representatives from the countries concerned. The committee will then
hold a meeting in camera in the afternoon to analyze the hearing’s
results.

A press conference will take place at 2 pm on 6 November at the
Bundestag with, among others, Moldova’s Minister of Reintegration
Vasilii Å~^ova, Georgia’s State Minister for Conflict settlement
Davit Bakradze, Azerbaijan’s Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov,
the Chair of the Monitoring Committee Eduard Lintner, and SWP Director
Uwe Halbach.

–Boundary_(ID_V/qj9BnJw25VhdNYOz2Apg)–

The Hunt On Vahhabits Has Launched In Azerbaijan

THE HUNT ON VAHHABITS HAS LAUNCHED IN AZERBAIJAN

PanARMENIAN.Net
30.10.2007 GMT+04:00

As soon as the first terrorist blows himself up with the name of
Allah, the hopes for the democracy rehabilitation in the country will
be nullified.

Last night a special operation was carried out on the territory of
Sabayli in Baku, during which four vahhabits were caught and the imam
of vahhabits, Mirza Alibek oglu Alibekov was arrested. During the
search a large bulk of religious literature was seized from him. The
rise of this radical grouping in Azerbaijan is most likely connected
with the latest events in the Middle East, and particularly with the
Kurdish-Turkish confrontation.

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Azerbaijan has been one of the strong bases of
vahhabits, along with Chechnya. It is enough to remind, that the
very followers of this branch of radical Islam fought as mercenaries
during the Artsakh War, including well known Shamil Basayev, Khatab
and other Chechen field commanders.

The Ministry of the National Security of Azerbaijan prevented
the attempts of terrorist acts in Baku, by arresting a group
of vahhabits. At the same time the Ministry of National Security
prevented the attempts of terrorist acts against several government
institutions in Baku, as well as embassies and diplomatic missions in
the capital of Azerbaijan, because of which the US and UK Embassies
were temporarily closed. According to the representative of state
committee on works with religious organizations Khidayat Orujeva,
vahhabit groupings acting in Azerbaijan are controlled by foreign
powers, as well as their representatives in the Republic, says Day.az.

Regardless the assertions of the Ministry of National Security of
Azerbaijan according to which the atmosphere in the country is quite
stable, it can hardly be spoken about stability in the country where
various radical Islamic groupings act openly. No matter how much the
official figures of Baku insist that "Azerbaijan is developing very
quickly", in fact the country is buried in corruption, ignorance
and poverty, what, according to experts in terrorism and Islam is
the right environment for development of such groupings. It is not
by chance that there are military men among vahhabits. The customs
ruling the Azerbaijani army, where the death is always attributed to
"shootings from the Armenian side", the only way to survive is starting
a fight against Aliyev’s regime by all possible means.

Vahhabits are already a probe-tested scenario.

Vahhabism is a study which has appeared in Islam recently. This is
a study, which was created by the religious figure of Saudi Arabia
Mohamed ibn Abdul Vahhab in the middle of the XVIII in the frames of
Suniism. The main ideology of Vahhabism is monotheism.

The followers of this study deny all the innovations in Islam, such
as worshiping saints and imams, like it is accepted among Shiites,
and insists on worshiping Allah only. In spite of the big difference
between the views, Vahhabits advocated brotherhood and unity in the
Islamic world, condemned luxury, achieved social harmony and adherence
of principles of morals. The study of Abdul Vahhab was once supported
by many Arab sheiks. Later Vahhabism became a religious-political
study, and then the official ideology of Saudi Arabia, as well as of
a number of Arab Emirates.

According to the newspaper "Zerkalo" groupings striving to "reestablish
justice" by means of force, i.e. punishing "the enemies of Islam and
criminals" by the name of Allah, develop in the Azeri society. "All
we need is serious socio-political reforms, which would prevent
terrorism by depriving it from its resources. But as soon as the
first terrorist blows up himself with the name of Allah, the hopes
for the democracy rehabilitation in the country will be nullified,"
writes the newspaper. Political scientist Ilgar Mamedov said that
the USA could supply Azerbaijan with something which had brought to
realization of special operation. "Most likely the information about
these groupings has been provided by Azeri special services during the
latest visit of the Director the Central Intelligence Agency General
Michael Hayden to Azerbaijan," thinks Mamedov. Other experts think
that ultraconservative religious attitudes rise in Azerbaijan and
the question of controlling of the Islamic radicalism comes to the
first plan together with other very important issues.

GUAM Foreign Ministers To Meet In Kiev

GUAM FOREIGN MINISTERS TO MEET IN KIEV

armradio.am
30.10.2007 17:35

November 14 the frozen conflicts on the territories of GUAM member
states will be discussed in Kiev, Ukrainian Ambassador to Azerbaijan
Stepan Volkovetski, "Kavkazpress" reports.

"Ukraine has come forth with the initiative to organize a forum
dedicated to the frozen conflicts over GUAM territory on the level of
the Foreign Ministers of Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova,"
the Ambassador said. According to him, the program of the forum is
being corrected.

Who Will Build New Atomic Station In Armenia?

WHO WILL BUILD NEW ATOMIC STATION IN ARMENIA?
James Hakobyan

Lragir, Armenia
Oct 29 2007

Passions about the construction of a new nuclear plant are going to
be high. It is known that the Armenian government together with the
Russian government has advanced in talks on cooperation over energy.

The statement by Anthony Godfrey, ex-U.S. charge d’affaires, a.i. to
Armenia, is notable that the United States is interested in the
construction of a nuclear plant in Armenia, and the government is
discussing with specialists the ways of assistance to Armenia. In
fact, Paris has also joined Moscow and Washington. Nicola Sarkosi
said, as Serge Sargsyan had stated after meeting him, his country is
interested in nuclear cooperation with Armenia. The interest of these
three states is explained by the political rather than the economic
importance of the nuclear plant. In other words, the decision that
Armenia must make on choosing a partner to build a nuclear plant is
going to be a political decision. In this sense, there is likelihood
that a pro-Russian decision will be made, especially that the talks
have been lasting long now, not intensively, but the top government
of Armenia has already had two meetings with the head of the Russian
Federal Atomic Energy Agency Sergey Kirienko: when he visited Yerevan,
and when Serge Sargsyan visited Moscow.

On the other hand, however, it is clear that Yerevan cannot refuse
the United States and France plainly, considering the circumstance
of the presidential election. Serge Sargsyan cannot give a distinct
answer about the crucial issue of the nuclear plant at this important
moment because the answer will disappoint the United States and
France. Consequently, on the eve of the presidential election Serge
Sargsyan cannot spoil relations with these countries. Meanwhile,
the nuclear plant will surely cause complexity because the extent
of influence in the South Caucasus largely depends on who controls
the nuclear plant in the region. This is the reason why the West
wants to have the nuclear plant controlled by Russia closed down,
and the reason is not technical or economic. The expectation is to
remove Russia from the construction of the nuclear plant, thereby
reducing an important part of its influence in the region.

In this connection, Armenia is becoming an important factor in the
region for which Washington, Moscow and Paris are competing. In the
first layer of this competition, judging by external signs, at the
moment there is no acuteness this issue of importance is supposed
to have. However, it is perhaps due to the behavior of the Armenian
government which apparently gives a positive answer to all the parties,
expecting from them a positive attitude toward Serge Sargsyan before
the election. As to what Armenia will be doing, it is a matter of
time. After all, over these years the Armenian government has dealt
with the world with this principle, conducting a policy of moment. In
other words, the important national issues need not be resolved, they
should temporize to solve their own problems at the expense of the
national problems. Meanwhile, time solves the national problems. As it
has been the case so far, time solves problems not in the best way,
as it would be desirable. But like Serge Sargsyan is fond of quoting
one of the great men, "The best is the enemy of the good." Therefore,
perhaps, the Armenian government avoids best solutions. But the problem
is that they cannot achieve the good if they avoid the best. All the
past examples are evidence to it, when by a short-term solution Armenia
gave the bulk of its energy sector, transport and industries to Russia,
raising its dependence on this country to perfection. According to
this logic, history may repeat regarding the nuclear plant, especially
that the money allocated for subsidizing gas is finishing, and the
Russians are likely to raise the price.

U.S. And Britain Close Embassies In Baku Over Security Concerns

U.S. AND BRITAIN CLOSE EMBASSIES IN BAKU OVER SECURITY CONCERNS

PanARMENIAN.Net
29.10.2007 13:27 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Britain closed its embassy in Azerbaijan on Monday
because of security concerns and the United States moved its embassy
to limited operations, also citing security, officials said.

Neither embassy would comment on the nature of the threat.

"The embassy is closed due to some local security concerns. The
situation will be kept under review," a spokeswoman for the British
embassy said.

A spokesman for the U.S. embassy said, "The embassy has gone to
limited operations in connection with a threat against the embassy,"
Reuters reports.

As reported by Day.az, the office of BP Azerbaijan was also closed
today as a preventive measure. Meanwhile the Azeri Ministry of
Interior, Ministry of National Security and Ministry of Foreign
Affairs said they are not aware of the threat.

Ruling Party ‘Untroubled’ By Ter-Petrosian Comeback

RULING PARTY ‘UNTROUBLED’ BY TER-PETROSIAN COMEBACK
By Ruzanna Khachatrian and Karine Kalantarian

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Oct 29 2007

Former President Levon Ter-Petrosian’s decision to stand in next
year’s presidential election will not force any changes in the
electoral strategy of the governing Republican Party of Armenia (HHK),
one of its leaders said on Monday. "It would make no sense for the
most influential political force participating in the presidential
elections make changes in its strategy based on the participation or
non-participation of another candidate," parliament speaker Tigran
Torosian told reporters. He said the HHK will unveil its campaign
manifesto at a congress scheduled for November 10. The congress is
also expected to formally nominate the party’s top leader, Prime
Minister Serzh Sarkisian, as a presidential candidate.

Sarkisian has been regarded as the election favorite since the HHK’s
landslide victory in last May’s parliamentary elections. Observers
believe that Ter-Petrosian’s political comeback makes the outcome of
the vote due in February or March less predictable. Ter-Petrosian
announced his decision to run for president on Friday at a rally
in central Yerevan attended by an estimated 20,000 people. In a
90-minute speech, he repeated his harsh criticism of Armenia’s current
leadership and pledged to do his best to prevent a "reproduction
of the criminal regime." Although the Ter-Petrosian rally was the
biggest opposition protest staged in years, Torosian downplayed
its significance and claimed that it did not live up to organizers’
expectations. "A lot was done to gather many people," he said. "I
don’t think that expectations were lived up to." In televised
remarks broadcast on Friday, President Robert Kocharian dismissed
Ter-Petrosian’s electoral chances, saying that his predecessor will
not be Sarkisian’s main challenger. Kocharian said Armenians have
not forgotten severe hardship suffered by them during the early and
mid-1990s. He accused the Ter-Petrosian administration of "ruining"
the Armenian economy. Torosian, whose party supported Ter-Petrosian
until 1998, was less categorical on that score, saying that the
economy teetered on the brink of collapse at the time for "objective
and subjective" reasons. "I believe the president of the republic
referred to subjective processes," he said. The Armenian speaker also
declined to endorse Kocharian’s claims that there are "at least two or
three" opposition presidential candidates who are more popular than
Ter-Petrosian. "Rivals are classified not by politicians but by the
public with its votes," he said. Unlike Kocharian, Sarkisian has so
far been quite cautious in commenting on Ter-Petrosian’s return to
active politics and has yet to comment on the ex-president’s Friday
speech. The Armenian premier avoided any contact with journalists as
he visited the parliament building in Yerevan on Monday. Kocharian’s
highly negative assessment of his predecessor’s track record in power
could put Sarkisian in a delicate position given the fact he held
key government positions during most of Ter-Petrosian’s seven-year
presidency. Sarkisian was appointed as Armenia’s defense minister in
1993 and later served as minister of national security and internal
affairs in the Ter-Petrosian administration. In a related development,
police in Yerevan questioned on Monday several Ter-Petrosian loyalists
who were controversially arrested last week while publicizing Friday’s
rally in the city’s Liberty Square. The arrests followed a brief
clash between riot police and a group of opposition activists, most
of them members of the pro-Ter-Petrosian Aylentrank movement. The
11 activists, among them two newspaper editors, were set free after
four-hour negotiations between Ter-Petrosian and senior police
officers. They say the violence erupted after police officers
"illegally" stopped their march through the city center sanctioned
by the Yerevan municipality. The police, however, lay the blame on
the oppositionists, saying that the latter interfered with traffic
and littered streets with leaflets.

They opened a criminal case under articles of the Armenian Criminal
Code dealing with "hooliganism" and assault on state officials.

None of the oppositionists has been formally charged yet. "They are
now trying to show that our march disrupted traffic and so on," Nikol
Pashinian, editor of the "Haykakan Zhamanak" daily who led the action,
told RFE/RL after being questioned by police investigators. "They’ve
found two witnesses. One is a policeman and the other is a guy
I’ve known for a long time. I asked [the police] to subject him to a
psychiatric examination." Ter-Petrosian warned on Friday that he would
consider any further act of "repression" against his supporters a
"criminal violation of the electoral rights of citizens."

Armenian-Americans To Rally For Genocide Resolution

ARMENIAN-AMERICANS TO RALLY FOR GENOCIDE RESOLUTION

HULIQ, NC
Oct 28 2007

LOS ANGELES–Armenian-Americans and human rights supporters across
the nation will hold several large-scale rallies on November 4,
2007 calling for the passage of the Armenian Genocide Resolution
(H. Res.106).

The mass gatherings, entitled "Rally 106: United Voices for the
Armenian Genocide Resolution" will be held in Los Angeles, Phoenix,
Houston, San Francisco, and Washington DC and are expected to draw
thousands of community members and human rights advocates.

"We are excited that a broad cross section of Americans will be on
hand for Rally 106," said Ishkhan Boghossian, the director of the Los
Angeles area rally. "By supporting the passage of the resolution we are
supporting human rights and justice, two fundamental American values.

"We are also going to stand firmly against an attempt by a foreign
government, Turkey, to silence the voice of the American People,"
he said, adding, "The Republic of Turkey is funneling millions to
Washington in a bid to strangle America’s commitment to human rights.

That is immoral and we will be gathering to reject Turkey’s foreign
interference."

"Rally 106" comes at a time when the government of Turkey is
increasing its efforts to prevent the passage of the Armenian Genocide
Resolution. Turkey has hired public relations and lobbying firms such
as the Livingston Group, Fleishman Hillard, and DLA Piper to lobby
Members of Congress and persuade them to vote against the Armenian
Genocide resolution.

"Contrary to what Turkey says, the passage of the Armenian Genocide
Resolution has nothing to do with the reality that the Turks may
move forward with their threat to cut critical supply routes to our
troops in Iraq," said Caspar Jivalagian, chairman of the Armenian
Youth Federation. "They were the cause of much hardship and strain
on our troops at the start of the war at which time there was no
Armenian Genocide Resolution pending in congress," he added.

"The reason Turkey makes threats against our country is quite simple;
they are an inconsistent ally and surely not a friend of ours."

Thousands are expected to gather at the rallies in support of the
Armenian Genocide Resolution, where various elected officials and
dignitaries will voice their support as well. The Los Angeles area
Rally 106 will be held in the Little Armenia area of Hollywood near the
intersection of Hollywood Blvd. and Alexandria on Sunday, November 4,
2007 at 3pm.

s-to-rally-for-genocide-resolution

http://www.huliq.com/39819/armenian-american

Iran-Armenia: Looking At Future Horizons

IRAN-ARMENIA: LOOKING AT FUTURE HORIZONS
by Dr Hasan Beheshtipur

Iran Newspaper, Iran
Oct 24, 2007

Dr Hasan Beheshtipur *: The president of the Islamic Republic of Iran,
Dr Mahmud Ahmadinezhad, visited the Republic of Armenia on Monday
(30 Mehr) [22 October]. He arrived in the Armenian capital, Yerevan,
as the head of a high-ranking political-economic delegation.

[Punctuation as published here and throughout.]

In the course of his meeting with Robert Kocharyan, the Armenian
president, he carried out talks about the ways to expand the relations
of the two neighbouring countries. At the end of the negotiations four
memoranda of understanding for cooperation and a joint statement were
signed. The establishment of consulates in the territories of the two
states, cooperation between the Central Banks, construction of wind
farms and investment in technical and economic venues constituted
the four documents signed in this visit.

Delivering speeches at the Armenian National Assembly and the state
university at Yerevan and meeting Iranians living in Armenia were
among Dr Mahmud Ahmadinezhad’s other programmes during the visit.

Relations between Iran and Armenia enjoy a deep historical and
cultural background. In particular, coexistence attended by mutual
respect throughout the past long years has redoubled the interest of
Iran and Armenia to expand and strengthen those relations.

Following the disintegration of Soviet Union, relations between
Iran and Armenia entered a new phase. During those years, relations
between Iran and Armenia have grown in diverse arenas. However, the
growth has been concentrated mainly in economic cooperation. Among
the most important aspects of the economic cooperation between the
two countries is the transfer of electrical power and export of Iran’s
gas to Armenia through a pipeline.

The gas pipeline from Iran to Armenia was opened in 2007. It is 113km
long and when it is fully commissioned [and] some 3m cubic metres
of gas will be exported from Iran to Armenia every day. One of the
long-term objectives of the project is the setting up of a gateway for
the export of Iran’s gas to Europe. The pipeline has the capacity of
carrying up to 10m cubic metres of gas and can be one of the routes
envisaged for exporting Iran’s gas to Europe. The Iran-Armenia gas
pipeline has a diameter of 700mm and capability of transferring
1.2bn cubic metres of gas per year. Initially, the pipeline will
export 1.1bn cubic metres of gas [per year] and from 2019 onwards
it will export 2.3bn cubic metres. In order to reach that capacity,
the Armenian side is to increase the pipeline of 197kms.

Trade exchange between Iran and Armenia

At present, the volume of trade between the two states amounts to 200m
dollars. Some 160m dollars relate to exports by Iran and 40m to the
Armenian exports. Tehran and Yerevan are making efforts to increase the
volume of their trade to more than five times its existing level. Of
course, the initial target is to bring the volume of trade exchange
to 500m dollars.

If we take into account technical and engineering services as well,
that figure can reach 1bn dollars of trade and services exchanged
between the two states. In this respect so far more than 90 documents
on joint cooperation have been signed by the two countries.

Armenia is among the states that alongside other regional states play
an effective role in the trade circle of the north-south corridor.

The corridor has been established between India, Iran and Russia and
is considered to be one of the important trade routes and the link
between Europe and East and West Asia.

The expansion of cooperation in agriculture, fisheries, stockbreeding,
banking and investment, communications and telecommunications, optical
fibre and roaming mobiles as well as expansion in cultural, academic
and educational cooperation are among other fields that have been
examined during nine rounds of talks between the two states within
the framework of the Joint Economic Committee. There has been good
progress in that respect. However, given the aligned outlooks of both
countries with respect to the stability and security of the region,
the expansion of Iranian and Armenian relations in the political
domain too will help deepen political and security convergence in the
crisis-prone region of south Caucasus and reduce the existing tensions.

>>From that point of view, the Islamic Republic of Iran is seeking a
balanced expansion of relations with all the regional states. On that
basis, Iran has proposed bilateral and multi-lateral cooperation and
creation of security models on the basis of cooperation between Iran
and the Caucasus regional states. Iran considers such relations to
be to the benefit of the collective interests of the states.

Among the important projects on the agenda of relations between the two
countries, one can refer to the agreement on the construction of the
Aras hydroelectric power station, feasibility study for establishing
a direct rail link between the two countries, preliminary talks
and setting up of a tripartite committee to study the grounds for
founding an oil refinery in Armenia with the participation of Iran,
Russia and Armenia and the setting up of an Iran Trade Centre in
Armenia with the participation of the private sector.

The founding of a joint Iran, Russia and Armenia oil refinery
provides a suitable model for the expansion of Iran’s economic ties
and strengthening of its political relations with the Caucasus regional
states. On the basis of the history of Iran’s policy in the Caucasus,
which predominantly shows a uniform combination of maturity and
caution in Iran’s foreign policy, southern Caucasus can be considered
to be the clearest reason for Iran’s pro-activeness in its foreign
policy. Besides being influenced by the positive interaction with
Russia, the pro-activeness has been affected by the policy of creating
a positive balance in relations with Azerbaijan and Armenia.

That has increased Iran’s positive role in south Caucasus.

The second factor that determines the importance of south Caucasus for
Iran is an outside consideration; that is to say, the competitive clash
of interests in the region with the West. The clash of interests that
covers areas outside the regional frontiers from America to Europe
has acted as an important factor in forming Iran’s policies in the
Caucasus, including Armenia. With such an outlook, the reality of
the relations between Iran and Armenia has progressed with a common
understanding of the long-term interests of the two states. In a
strategic interpretation, Iran looks upon Armenia as more than just a
neighbour with a history of good bilateral relations and the existence
of a considerable Armenian minority in Iran.

Iran looks upon Armenia as a country with a common need for overcoming
foreign pressures. Two principal and effective factors affecting the
relations between Iran and Armenia are energy and geopolitics. The
provision of energy is of vital importance to Armenia as well as
Iran. The export of gas through Armenia to Europe plays a crucial
role in giving diversity to export markets. Armenia’s position as
Iran’s route to the Caucasus alongside Azerbaijan is most effective
and crucial. On that basis, the meetings between the presidents of
the two states which have been taking place regularly in the past two
years have played a determining role in the expansion of bilateral
and regional cooperation.

[Footnote:]

* Senior expert in Central Asian and Caucasian affairs

Participation In Presidential Election For Opposition Heritage Party

PARTICIPATION IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION FOR OPPOSITION HERITAGE PARTY IS NOT AN END IN ITSELF

arminfo
2007-10-26 16:36:00

ArmInfo. Participation in the presidential election of 2008 is not
an end in itself for the opposition Heritage party, Armenian MP
representing Heritage party Armen Martirosyan said at a briefing in
the parliament, Friday.

He said the party will make a decision on the format of participation
in the election in mid-November. The major goal of the party is
to bring fundamental changes to the country. At the same time,
he confirmed that Heritage party members participate in October
26 opposition rally to support the ex-president of Armenia Levon
Ter-Petrosyan. ‘Members of Heritage party like other citizens of
Armenia can use their right to information and participate in rallies,
‘ he said. A. Martirosyan said he will also attend the rally. He
stressed that the party regularly meets electors and the greatest
part of them support Heritage Leader Raffi Hovhannissyan.

Number Of Electron And Printed Armenian Mass Media Exceed Maximum Pe

NUMBER OF ELECTRON AND PRINTED ARMENIAN MASS MEDIA EXCEED MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE LEVEL OF SUBJECTIVITY: REPRESENTATIVE OF RULING PARTY

arminfo
2007-10-25 14:12:00

ArmInfo. ‘A number of electron and printed Mass Media in their
information policy exceed the maximum permissible level of
subjectivity, member of Board of the ruling Republican party of
Armenia Artak Zakaryan said today at the seminar "Role of Mass Media
in Armenia’s Internal Political Life", organized by the Armenian
Center of National and International Studies.

He also said that the problems in the Mass Media’s activity always
existed.

"Unfortunately, the information in Mass Media not always reflects the
real picture of events, the assessments in many cases are extremely
subjective.

Though progress is apparent in the Mass Media’s activity, the situation
in general cannot be called satisfactory", A. Zakaryan said.

At the same time, he said, extra emphasis on specific problems is
observed in the work of the Mass Media, that causes a definite
disbalance in their information policy. A. Zakaryan, urging not
call the specific Mass Media, paid attention to the atmosphere of
permissiveness that "prevails in newspapers’ activity". However,
this statement aroused a negative reaction of the rest of experts and
representatives of human rights organizations present at the seminar.