Many Lebanese-Armenians unable to withdraw savings to repatriate amid crisis, High Commissioner says

Save

Share

 16:20,

YEREVAN, AUGUST 14, ARMENPRESS. High Commissioner for Diaspora Affairs Zareh Sinanyan says he has come across two different messages while visiting the Lebanese-Armenian community in Beirut after the August 4 explosion. Sinanyan led a government delegation to the Lebanese capital to assess the damages. 

Sinanyan said that during a meeting with the spiritual leaders he received the message that the Lebanese-Armenians are firmly standing on their land and that the community will be restored, however, a different message was conveyed in meetings with individuals from different organizations.

“The panic mood people had there was obvious”, said Sinanyan. “They had the desire to leave Lebanon, many of them want to come to Armenia. I have to say that the issue is very complex. Even having that desire some of them physically cannot come because due to banking restrictions they are unable to withdraw their savings, sell their homes or businesses. These are the savings they had planned for their next home. I don’t think that this flow will happen in just a week, a month or even a year,” he said.

In one month, over 470 Lebanese-Armenians have repatriated to Armenia, Sinanyan said.

370 of them arrived on 5 different flights operated by Middle East Airlines on July 14, July 21, July 28, August 4 and August 11.

101 others were airlifted back to Armenia on board the emergency relief planes that delivered humanitarian aid to Beirut after the August 4 explosion.

 “Those who came were the ones who were unable to stay in Lebanon now, they wanted to return to their homeland and we helped them”.

“These are people who are coming to settle down and live in Armenia,” he said.

High Commissioner Zareh Sinanyan stressed that repatriation is one of the strategic directions for Armenia and the government’s actions in this area are envisaged for all repatriates.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Pashinyan’s revelations on BBC: Russia is not Armenia’s ally, Karabakh’s population was only 18% Armenian

Vestnik Kavkaza
Aug 14 2020
14 Aug in 12:40

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan spoke to BBC Hardtalk’s Stephen Sackur. During the 20-minute interview, the Armenian PM made several statements that could provoke political scandals both within the republic and in Russia.

In particular, Nikol Pashinyan verbally lowered the level of Russian-Armenian relations, from allies to partner countries, when Sackur asked him about Armenia’s strategia choice – whether it wants to adhere to relations with Russia or look much more toward the EU and NATO.

In response, Pashinyan apparently wanted to play along with the Western audience of the BBC: “Russia is a strategic partner of Armenia in terms of security.” It is unlikely that this was just due to insufficient knowledge of the English language, especially since Sackur used the word alliance in his question about the relations between Armenia and Russia.

The Armenian prime minister clearly deliberately called Russia only a partner, not an ally, and only in terms of security, after which he began talking about relations with the West in complimentary tones.

“We are a member of the Eurasian Economic Union, and we have a Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement with the EU. And by the way now the European Union is our main partner in our reform agenda implementation. We have quite effective cooperation with NATO and by the way we are participating in peacekeeping missions in Afghanistan, in Lebanon, in Kosovo, in Mali. We have quite effective cooperation with the United States too,” Pshinyan listed more important, in his opinion, aspects of Armenia’s international policy than ties with the Russian Federation.

After that, the presenter drew attention to critical failures in the logic of modern Yerevan: Armenia cannot be close to NATO, being in a conflict with Turkey, and cannot move closer to the United States without stopping trade relations with Iran, but most importantly, it has choices to make between staying loyal to Moscow and embracing a “different direction”. In response, Nikol Pashinyan once again said that he considers relations with Russia to be only at the level of strategic partnership.

Thus, the head of the Republic of Armenia de facto announced the withdrawal of Yerevan from allied relations with Russia.

In addition, speaking about the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Nikol Pashinyan voiced statistics that refute all the previous rhetoric of the occupants of Azerbaijani territories. “Look at reality. Reality is in the moment of this conflict, 19% … 18% of the population of Nagorno-Karabakh were Armenians,” he said, although the standard position of supporters of the Karabakh occupation is based on the fact that in the last Soviet years the Karabakh’s population was up to 80% Armenian.

It remains unclear what is behind this scandalous statement, which directly contradicts the official Soviet statistics, among other things.

For the rest, Nikol Pashinyan tried to avoid the presenter’s acute questions. He never responded to a request to directly recognize or not recognize the war crimes of his political predecessors during the Nagorno-Karabakh war, called the construction of a road in the occupied Lachin region of Azerbaijan (condemned by the European Union) “not an Armenian initiative”, did not recognize the failure of domestic policy to fight with the coronavirus pandemic. In general, in an interview with Stephen Sackur, the Prime Minister of Armenia found himself in the position of an acquitted accused, and of course, it’s not only due to the Hardtalk programme’s style, but also because his own mistakes as a statesman exceeded a certain critical mass that ousted any positive agenda from conversations with independent journalists.



Armenian government delegation meets with Catholicos Aram I in Lebanon

Save

Share

 09:33,

YEREVAN, AUGUST 10, ARMENPRESS. The Armenian government delegation which traveled to Beirut on board the relief plane carrying humanitarian aid has taken part at a mass in Antelias served by Aram I, the Catholicos of the Great House of Cilicia in the Saint Gregory the Illuminator Cathedral.

The delegation includes Armenia’s High Commissioner for Diaspora Affairs Zareh Sinanyan, the administrator of the High Commissioner’s Office Sara Anjaroglyan, Deputy Prime Minister Tigran Avinyan’s Office Administrator Varag Siserian, lawmaker and head of the Parliamentary Friendship Group between Armenia and Lebanon Hrachya Hakobyan and the executive director of the Hayastan All Armenian Fund Haykak Arshamyan.

After the mass, the delegation had a meeting with Catholicos Aram I. The catholicos presented the condition of the Lebanese-Armenian community after the Beirut blast. He said that the homes of many representatives of the Armenian community have been damaged and require speedy rebuilding, Sinanyan’s Office said in a news release.

Aram I emphasized the importance of prioritizing the needs of the Armenian community and said that a commission involving all community institutions is working on this matter.

Sinanyan noted that the purpose of the visit isn’t simply to accompany the humanitarian aid but to evaluate the situation on the ground and meet with the Armenian community.

The Catholicos noted in his remarks that parallel to strengthening Armenia it is important to strengthen the Diaspora as well. In this context Sinanyan attached importance to the fundraiser launched by the Hayastan fund.

“At the end of the meeting, both sides reiterates that the fatherland’s doors are always open for the Diaspora”, Sinanyan’s Office said in the news release.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 08/07/2020

                                        Friday, August 7, 2020
Arrested Former Official Denies Abuse Of Power Charges
        • Naira Bulghadarian
Armenia -- Robert Nazarian chairs a session of the Public Services Regulatory 
Commission, Yerevan, June 7, 2013.
Robert Nazarian, Armenia’s former chief utility regulator, strongly denied 
corruption charges brought against him on Friday one day after his arrest.
The Special Investigative Service (SIS) formally charged Nazarian with abuse of 
power and asked a Yerevan court to remand him in pre-trial custody. The court is 
due to rule on the petition on Saturday.
The SIS also arrested and indicted two other former members of the Public 
Services Regulatory Commission (PSRC) which was headed by Nazarian from 2003 to 
2018.
The law-enforcement body claimed on Thursday that Nazarian, 64, ensured in 2011 
the privileged treatment by the PSRC of an energy company allegedly linked to 
Mikael Minasian, former President Serzh Sarkisian’s son-in-law. It said that 
allowed a hydroelectric plant privatized by the company in 2010 to make more 
than 7 billion drams ($14.5 million) in extra profits over the next eight years.
“The accusation has nothing to do with reality,” Nazarian’s lawyer, Gagik 
Khachikian, told RFE/RL’s Armenian service. “It is completely unfounded and 
illegal.”
Khachikian insisted that his client, who had served as Yerevan’s mayor from 
2001-2003, did not break any laws or regulations in his capacity as PSRC 
chairman. Investigators have not presented any evidence to the contrary, he said.
The DzoraHEK plant was handed over to the Armenia Defense Ministry in 2001 one 
year after Sarkisian became defense minister. He ran the ministry until 2007.
In 2010, then President Sarkisian’s government decided to sell the 26-megawatt 
facility to the Dzoraget Hydro company for 3.6 billion drams ($7.5 million).
Prosecutors said in May 2019 DzoraHEK was in fact worth an estimated 8 billion 
drams ($16.8 million). Earlier this year, they indicted Seyran Ohanian, 
Armenia’s defense minister from 2008 to 2016, in connection with the plant’s 
privatization which they said caused “substantial damage” to the state.
Ohanian denied any responsibility for the deal, saying that it was negotiated by 
the Armenian Energy Ministry and approved by the former government.
Minasian, who is married to one of Sarkisian’s daughters, left Armenia in late 
2018 and is now facing separate corruption charges rejected by him as 
politically motivated.
Government Details Armenian Aid To Lebanon
        • Marine Khachatrian
LEBANON -- Medics shift an injured person from Najjar Hospital to another 
hospital in Al-Hamra area in Beirut after Port explosion, in Beirut, August 4, 
2020.
The Armenian government clarified on Friday that it will send three planeloads 
of humanitarian aid to Lebanon following a massive explosion in Beirut which 
killed at least 154 people and injured thousands of others.
Deputy Prime Minister Tigran Avinian said that about 12 tons of medication, 
foodstuffs and other vital supplies will be delivered to the Lebanese capital on 
Saturday evening. Two more such flights will be carried out from Yerevan in the 
following days, Avinian said at a meeting of senior government officials chaired 
by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian.
The government pledged to provide relief aid immediately after Tuesday’s 
explosion at Beirut port warehouses. Pashinian described Lebanon as “one of 
Armenia’s closest friends,” alluding to the existence of a sizable and 
influential Armenian community in the Middle Eastern state.
At least 11 members of the community were reportedly among the victims of the 
explosion. The devastating blast wave also destroyed or seriously damaged many 
Lebanese Armenian homes.
Avinian said that several Armenian government officials and lawmakers, including 
Zareh Sinanyan, the commissioner of Diaspora affairs, will also fly to Beirut on 
Saturday on board the transport plane. He said they will try to ascertain other 
needs of Lebanon’s government and Armenian community.
Sinanyan told reporters that Yerevan was also prepared to send rescue teams and 
medics to Beirut. He said the Lebanese authorities turned down the offer because 
the Armenian side could not airlift the kind of heavy machinery that is used by 
rescuers from other countries sent to Beirut.
The blast and its devastating consequences have led to calls for the evacuation 
of Lebanon’s ethnic Armenian nationals willing to relocate to Armenia. Some 
opposition politicians and public figures as well as Lebanese-born citizens or 
residents of Armenia have urged the Armenian government to launch special 
Yerevan-Beirut flights for that purpose.
Zulal Tsaturian, a Lebanese Armenian woman, immigrated to Armenia with her 
husband and children three years ago. Her parents and brother lived until 
Tuesday in an apartment located just a few hundred meters from the Beirut port. 
It was seriously damaged by the blast.
“They are still in shock,” Tsaturian told RFE/RL’s Armenian service.
“Now that they are homeless, they would love to come and join me here and start 
a new life in the homeland,” she said. “There is no life there anymore. 
Lebanon’s decline began a long time ago.”
Sarkisian Rules Out Armenia’s ‘Return To Past’
        • Sargis Harutyunyan
Armenia - Former President Serzh Sarkisian arrives at the parliament building, 
Yerevan, April 16, 2020
Former President Serzh Sarkisian assured Armenians on Friday that he is not 
seeking their country’s “return to the past” more than two years after losing 
power as a result of mass protests.
Despite remaining the top leader of the former ruling Republican Party of 
Armenia (HHK), Sarkisian has kept a low profile since the 2018 “Velvet 
Revolution” triggered by his attempt to extend his decade-long rule. During a 
rare and brief conversation with journalists in April this year, he promised to 
hold an extensive news conference after a coronavirus-related state of emergency 
in Armenia, which was due to end on May 14 but has been repeatedly extended 
since then.
In a series of short video messages posted on Facebook on Friday, Sarkisian 
blamed the current government’s “failed fight against the pandemic” and the 
continuing state of emergency for his failure to meet the press and speak at 
length for the first time since the revolution. He said he has decided to record 
instead video answers to questions preoccupying the public.
“It is clear that there can be no return to the past,” the 66-year-old 
ex-president said in response to one of those questions. “But it is equally 
clear that it is impossible to attain a bright future without correctly 
evaluating the past. The history of the newly independent Republic of Armenia 
cannot start from April 2018.”
“We have many things to do,” he went on. “Without losing hope, we need to 
consolidate all resources of our state, all capable forces and individuals and 
to move forward.”
Sarkisian added that he has rarely made public statements so far in order to 
avoid adding to political tensions and “polarization” in the country.
Other senior HHK figures regularly and strongly criticize the administration of 
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian, a former journalist who led the 2018 protests 
fuelled by popular anger against government corruption and injustice. They 
accuse the current authorities of incompetence, misrule and attempts to stifle 
dissent.
Pashinian and his political allies dismiss these claims. The premier has 
repeatedly implicated Sarkisian, his family and political entourage in 
corruption both before and after coming to power.
Sarkisian, his two brothers, son-in-law Mikael Minasian as well as some former 
senior officials have been indicted in separate corruption investigations 
launched after the 2018 regime change. They reject the accusations as 
politically motivated.
Former Armenian Lawmaker Extradited From Russia
Armenia -- Parliament deputy Levon Sargsian is seen in Yerevan, May 3, 2007.
Russia has extradited to Armenia a notorious Armenian businessman and former 
parliamentarian wanted by law-enforcement authorities in Yerevan on robbery 
charges.
Levon Sargsian held a seat in the Armenian parliament from 1999-2012. He 
officially represented former President Serzh Sarkisian’s Republican Party of 
Armenia (HHK) in the National Assembly from 2007-2012.
Sargsian, 52, had been on the run since the National Security Service (NSS) 
accused him in October 2018 of masterminding a 2008 robbery at the Yerevan house 
of Armen Avetisian, a former chief of the Armenian customs service. The NSS 
claimed that he hired an armed gang to break into the house and steal cash and 
precious items kept there because of his personal feud with Avetisian.
Ten alleged members of the gang were arrested, tried and given lengthy prison 
sentences in 2011. The NSS indicted Sargsian over the robbery six months after 
the 2018 “Velvet Revolution” in the country.
Sargsian was reportedly arrested by the Russian police near Moscow last 
November. Armenian prosecutors said in March this year that Russian authorities 
have agreed to extradite the man better known to Armenians as “Alraghatsi Lyov.”
According to a spokesman for Prosecutor-General Artur Davtian, Sargsian was 
flown to Yerevan late on Thursday.He was escorted by Armenian police officers 
and arrested at Yerevan airport, the official, Gor Abrahamian, announced on 
Facebook.
Armenian media for years linked Sargsian to various scandals, violent incidents 
and electoral fraud mostly reported in a Yerevan district where he lived and 
held sway. In 2009, for example, a female journalist said that the then 
influential parliamentarian swore at her and had his bodyguards physically 
attack her at a polling station in the capital.
Sargsian denied those claims. He avoided prosecution even after investigators 
effectively implicated him in a police cover-up of a murder committed in 2010. A 
police general was arrested and jailed for that crime in 2012.
Sargsian is one of several former senior Armenian officials who moved to Russia 
after the 2018 regime change to avoid prosecution on various charges. Moscow has 
not extradited most of them.
The fugitives include two other wealthy and influential members of Armenia’s 
former leadership who had earned the HHK many votes in elections. One of them, 
Mihran Poghosian, is the former chief of a state body enforcing judicial acts, 
while the other, Ruben Hayrapetian, used to head the Football Federation of 
Armenia. Both men are facing corruption charges denied by them.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2020 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
 

Armenia to become homeland for Arabs and Assyrians?

News.am, Armenia
Aug 7 2020

16:44, 07.08.2020
                  

The Treasure Map to the Forgotten Epoch of the Iravan Khanate

Modern Diplomacy
Aug 2 2020
 
 
 
 
 
August 2, 2020
 
By Irina Tsukerman
 
In an exclusive interview, the scholar of the “lost” Iravani Khanate, Amir Ali SardariIravani, reveals a rich history of a society marked by a peaceful coexistence between Christians and Muslims which has been all but erased from the understanding of the region by the subsequent and victorious governments.
 
History
 
According to the researcher, Iravan Khanat was an independent state in the South Caucasus, which emerged around 1748.  The official end of this state was in 1828 after the defeat of Qajars against Russia.  The period between its creation in 1748 and 1805 is called the real life of the independent Khanate of Iravan, whereas between 1805 and 1828 the Khanate was under the rule of the Qajar dynasty. It means that in this time the Khan of Iravan was appointed by the Qajar state.
 
The Qajar dynasty was a Persian royal dynasty of Turkic origin which ruled over Iran from 1789 through 1925 when it was displaced by the Pahlavis.
 
The development of the city Iravan as a center goes back to the Chukhur-Sa’adbeylerbeyli period in the beginning of the Safavid dynasty in 16th century, which followed by the independent Iravan Khanate in 18thcentury. As a result of the wars between the Ottoman and Safavid Empires, the city of Iravan passed 14 times from Safavids to Ottomans and vice versa. Each time the city exposed to certain destruction and was reconstructed again. After the collapse of the Safavids, the city wasoccupied by the Turks in 1723. In 1733 Nadir Shah conquered Iravan city from the Ottomans again. Nader Shah was an Iranian who belonged to the Turkmen Afshar tribe of Khorasan in northeastern Iran, which had supplied military power to the Safavid dynasty since the time of Shah Ismail Independent khanates were created after the deathof Nadir Shah Afshar in 1748. The city of Irevan became the capital of the Iravan khanate.
 
Iravan khanate covered the area between Mount Agri (Ararat) and MountAlagoz (Alayaz) and located on both banks of the Araz River.  The Iravan khanate was bordered on the north by Pambak river and Ganja khanates, on the east by Karabakh and Nakhchivan khanates, on the south by Khoy and Maku and Bayazid khanates,; on the west by Kars and on the north west by Shorayel sultanates. The territory of Iravan khanate was about 24 thousand square kilometers.
 
The Irevan fortress locating in a strategic position between the Ottoman Empire, Georgia and Safavid and later Afsharid empire has great importance for all neighboring states. It was built in 1582 by the Ottomans. The causes of political and military interference of neighboring governments in the internal affairs of Khanate of Iravan had emerged due to the commercial and strategic characteristics of Iravan and its unique geopolitical situation in the commercial routes and crossways of south Caucasus region. Located at the cross section between Europe, Asia, Russia, and the Middle East, and is known for the gamut of climates, and landscapes, and in those days, an international trade hub, which brought about a great deal of intercultural exchange, and contributed to the cultural, religious, and linguistic diversity in the region, as described in Thomas de Waal’s ” A Brief Guide to Understanding the Countries of the South Caucasus.”.
 
After the death of Nadir shah Afshar Mir Mehdi khan was the first khan of independent khanate of Iravan in 1747 but short time after that Azad khan, Afghan who was a general of Nadir shah, conquered Iravan and appointed Khalil khan uzbak as his representative and Khan of Iravan. In his timeIravan was being often attacked by Lezgins of Daghistan and Khalil khanuzbak was unable to protect Iravan.
 
Lezgins are a Northeast Caucasian ethnic group native predominantly to southern Dagestan, Russia and what is now northeastern Azerbaijan. In the 4th century BC, the numerous tribes speaking Lezgic languages united in a union of 26 tribes, formed in the Eastern Caucasus state of Caucasian Albania (which has nothing to do with the Balkan state), which itself was incorporated in the Persian Achaemenid Empire in 513 BC. Descendants of these tribes are now part of the rich makeup of the region, and retain distinctive cultural traditions.
 
The Lak Kazi Kumukh Khanate controlled a part of the Lezgins for a time in the 18th century after the disintegration of the Safavid Empire. In the first half of the 18th century, Persia was able to restore its full authority throughout the entire Caucasus under Nader Shah. Some Lezgins were part of the Kuba Khanate in what is now Azerbaijan, while others fell under the jurisdiction of the Derbent Khanate.In 1755 Hasanali khan who was a native Iravani and gained support of people of Iravan, replaced Khalil khan Uzbak.From this time on Iravan was an independent state under the rule of native khans for approximately 50 years until 1805. Hasanali khan gave his position to his brother Husseinali khan 4 years later. Under the rule of Husseinali khan and his son Mahammad khan, Iravan khanate experienced its most prosperous time. Husseinali khan and his son Mahammad khan were real politicians. Thepolitical life of Iravan Khanate  was always under the threat of neighboring powers.
 
This situation forced Husseinali Khan and later his son Mahammad khan towards the third power so that their political independence can be maintained. In fact, the formation of relations between Khanate of Iravan and neighboring powers  was due to political considerations and mutual interests. However, relations of Khan of Iravan with neighboring governments were not always stable, since the only objective for the Khanate of Iravan was to preserve its domain and governance over a localized region through utilization of any measures or means.
 
In the reign of Husseinali khan he benefited from support of Ottomans and also sometimes of Karim khan Zand (from Iran) to encounter Irakli (Erekle II) of Georgia. He used the conflict between Russia and Ottoman Empire on black sea as a political opportunity.
 
Later his son Mohammad khan played the similar political role with Russia and Agha Mohammad khan Qajar to maintain Iravan khanate, essentially playing one off the other, and receiving a level of protection from each – without ever being fully (or really) subservient to either. Agha Mohammad khan Qajar defeated Zand dynasty in Iran and came to power
 
in 1796. The Zand dynasty was an Iranian dynasty, a branch of Lurs or Kurds, origin founded by Karim Khan Zand that initially ruled southern and central Iran in the 18th century. It later quickly came to expand to include much of the rest of contemporary Iran, as well as what is modern day Azerbaijan, Bahrain, and parts of Iraq and Armenia. Mohammed Khan Qajar expected from the Khanates of Caucasus to obey him. The Khanates were ruled by the khans of Turkic Oghuz descents. Especially the khanates of Iravan, Ganja and Karabakh were ruled by the khans of Qajartribe. The Khan of Iravan did not trust him as a newcomer. It was the reason for the invasion of Agha Mohammad khan Qajar of Caucasus. The khan of Iravan was arrested by Agha Mohammad khan Qajar and sent to Tehran. But shortly after that Agha Mohammad khan Qajar was killed in Karabakh and the Iravan khan was returned to his home. Mahammad khan of Iravan continued the policy of gaining the balance of power between Russia and the Qajar state to maintain the independent Iravan khanate. In 1805 Mahammad khan was finally arrested and sent to exile by Fathali shah Qajar, the successor of AghaMohammad khan Qajar. Mahammad khan Iravani was treated by Fathali shahwith respect in exile. There were many cross marriages between his children and Fathali shah’s children in order to strengthen the ties between their dynasties. This was a strategy of rulers in those times to stabilize their power and reduce the risks of invasion or intervention by their rivals. After the death of Fathali shah Mahammad khanIravani got the highest military rank under Mohammad shah Qajar, the successor of Fathali shah, and married the daughter of Fathali shah. Hisson, Mahammad hasan khan, also married the daughter of Abbas mirza, the crown prince. This daughter was the full sister of Mohammad shah Qajar. I myself am a descendant of this line, explained the scholar. The descendants of Mahammad khanIravani have had a very good career among Qajars.  They were mostly very influential personalities who at times had ruled up to 75% of Iran as local governors.  They were very closely related to the royal family.
 
Even under Pahlavis, the family members had reached very high official posts.In 1807 Husseinqulu khan from Qazvin was appointed by Fathali shah to khanof Iravan. He and his brother Hasan khan were not native from Iravan. Manyhistorians have mistaken written that their father with Mahammad khan unfortunately.The political reform of Husseinqulu khan, driven by Fathali shah Qajar,changed the situation in Iravan khanate and led finally to heavy losses and Gulistan and Turkamanchay treaties. Khanate of Iravan was annexed to Russia in 1827.
 
The Treaty of Gulistan was a peace treaty concluded between Imperial Russia and Persia (modern day Iran) on 24 October 1813 in the village of Gulistan (in modern-day Goranboy Rayon of Azerbaijan) as a result of the first full-scale Russo-Persian War, lasting from 1804 to 1813. The peace negotiations were precipitated by Lankaran’s fall to Gen. PyotrKotlyarevsky on 1 January 1813.The treaty confirmed the ceding and inclusion of what is today Daghestan, eastern Georgia, most of the Republic of Azerbaijan, and parts of northern Armenia from Iran into the Russian Empire. The text was prepared by the British diplomat Sir Gore Ouseley who served as the mediator and wielded great influence at the Persian court. It was signed by Nikolai Rtischev from the Russian side[1] and Mirza Abolhassan Khan Ilchi from the Persian side.
 
The Treaty of Turkamanchay was an agreement between Persia(Iran) and the Russian Empire, which concluded the Russo-Persian War (1826–28). It was signed on 10 February 1828 in Torkamanchay, Iran. By the treaty, Persia ceded to Russia control of several areas in the South Caucasus: the Erivan Khanate, the Nakhchivan Khanate, and the remainder of the Talysh Khanate. The boundary between Russian and Persia was set at the Aras River. These territories comprise modern-day Armenia, the southern parts of the modern-day Republic of Azerbaijan, Nakhchivan, as well as Iğdır Province (now part of Turkey).
 
The treaty was signed for Persia by Crown Prince Abbas Mirza and Allah-Yar Khan Asaf al-Daula, chancellor to Shah Fath Ali (of the Qajar Dynasty), and for Russia by General Ivan Paskievich. Like the 1813 Treaty of Gulistan, this treaty was imposed by Russia, following military victory over Persia. Paskievich threatened to occupy Tehran in five days unless the treaty was signed.
 
Culture
 
Discussing the culture of the Iravan Khanate and the region, the researcher explained that at the beginning of 16th century and during the rise of Safavid empire, Iravan was an important strategic location for Safavids against Ottomans. It wasthe reason why Safavid rulers appointed their most capable and intelligent allies and generals to protect the fortifications in Iravan. In additionto the military importance, Iravan was a very strategic trade center. As a crossroad between east and west Iravan gained from economic and cultural interactions between different nations. This unique opportunity madeIravan into a cultural hub and a place for open minded people from different religions and backgrounds. Neighboring states were always very eager totake control over this area to gain from taxes and security advantages. These interests caused Iravan to be subjected to conflicts and extensive damages in Iravan from time to time.
 
The rulers of Iravan were close to Safavid dynasty. The first officialrepresentatives of the Safavid state, who were sent to Europe, were from Iravan. Safavid rulers finally declared Isfahan to be their capital, because it wasa safe location and far from borders but they were still very well connected with their high ranking officials and people from “Chokhur Sa’ad” (the name of Iravan state at that time). Safavi kings offered special conditions like tax relief for Armenians and tried to discourage them from treason. From time to time Christian rival states like Georgiaand Russia were inciting Armenians to conspire against Safavids.
 
In Safavi and Afshar periods Iravan was a battle field between Iran and Ottomans. The major powers looked to it as a potential proxy against one another and sought its allegiance, both through outreach and through force. After death of Nader shah Afshar, the Iravan Khanate era was the most peaceful period which lasted about 50 years. In this time the rulers of Iravan tried to secure their independent state through unique political position, maneuvering among the larger powers, but also utilizing the unique location to develop a business friendly climate favorable to merchants and to friendly diplomacy with neighboring states.
 
They could concentrate on their internal affairs and promote the quality of life and development inside their own society without interference or disturbance. Among cities with a large Christian minority, Iravan was much more tolerant than the very religious Muslim Isfahan. Many Western travelers who visited Iravan witnessed the religious freedom and tolerance in this country. It is obvious that some European travelers had sympathy for people who shared their faith and intended to reflect their complaints. It was In the 18th. century and even today we are struggling with the same conflict between ideologies, which at times portrayed conflicts as clashes between religions themselves, rather than between their practitioners. The period of Iravan khanate was the most prosperous time of this country. Trade was improved and the custom taxes were not paid to neighboring supporters but invested internally. Based on the very rare sources remaining from that period it wasthe golden age of Iravan. Mosques and churches, facilities for travelers like Bazars, Hamams and Caravansara is with eastern architecture were built or renovated. In the 18th. century, mosques were still the most important centers for education. A lesser known fact is that the first modern school and the new education system in Caucasus and Iran was initiated in Iravan some decades later, and the most appropriate conditions for this revolutionary initiative was prepared in Iravan khanate period. The tolerance for different perspectives and the openness due to the inherent diversity laid the foundation for this innovative approach.
 
Still, the peaceful period eventually came to an end. In 1796 and with the rise of the Qajar dynasty in Tehran, Agha Mohammad khan Qajar targeted Caucasus and the time of peace and prosperity was breached. Mahammad Khan Iravani was captured and forced to leave Iravan to Tehran. Although the Iravani khan was treated respectfully in Tehran, the conqueror Qajar state did not allow him to intervene in internal affairs of Iravan anymore. Instead, another loyal Qajar general was appointed to khan of Iravan “Hossein qulukhan”. From this time on, the history of the Khanate was written by the victors, by Qajar historians. The last Khan of Iravan started the so-called political reforms under control of Qajar state. In my opinion, continued the researcher, hedid not manage to accomplish anything of value, and only provoked Russia and the Armenian minority of Iravan. In his reign and in 1813 the entire Caucasus except Iravan andNakhchivan was annexed to Russia through the Gulistan treaty. Politicalmismanagement of Qajars led to huge territorial and other losses, and Iravan and Nakhchivan were entirely lost to Russia in 1827.
 
The last khan of Iravan in his reign was living in the Iravan Sardar palace,whose patron was the former khan “Mohammad khan Iravani”. Beside thepalace, Husseinqulu khan built a new mosque and named it the “Sardar mosque”.The contemporary German professor Markus Ritter, a specialist in the history of Islamic art, published a paper “thelost mosque in citadel of Yerevan” in 2009. He contacted me for some clarifications, added the scholar. Another German historian “Friedrich Sarre” had traveled to Iravanin 1897 and took some remaining tiles of this mosque to Berlin. Hedescribed in his book the very bad condition of the historical heritage of Khanate and those taken tiles are today displayed in the Berlin museum. Other European travelers who had visited Irevan at different times, described the Sardar’s Palace, its Mirror Hall, mosques, pools and baths in the castle and the city in their writings, as well as the underground marble stairedway passing down to the Zangi River.
 
There are eyewitness accounts of the marble Fountain once located in the middle of the hall of mirrors.As the result of the earthquake in 1853 the Iravan castle walls were damaged. Since 1868 Iravan City Police Office had been located in Khan Palace, Sardar Hall. The Caucasian viceroyalty allocated resources for there construction of Sardar hall (Mirror Hall) on the basis of petition of Iravan governor in 1867, 1871, 1874, 1880 years. From other recollections, we learn that an Armenian merchant by name of Nerse Tahiryan purchased a part of Iravan castle in 1865 and he built a winery (present cognac/brandy plant). Eventually Serdar Palace was completely demolished and the walls of the Iravan citadel were pulled down. The old districts are by also in ruins. In 1906-1911 years, B.Mehrabov, the engineer of Iravan city, mapped out the city plan and the existence of 8 mosques (Tepebashi, Zal khan, Sartib khan, Blue Mosque (Huseynali khan), Haji Novruzali bey, Gala mosque (Abbas Mirze mosque ), Demirbulag, Haji Jafar) were marked there. The Blue Mosque at Iravan was commissioned in 1765–1766 by Husseinali Khan, the Sardar of the IravanKhanate as the city’s main Friday mosque. It is today the only remaining monument from the Iravan Khanate. The reason why it survived is, the mosque was used as the city museum. There were a number of caravanserais in Iravan city as well: Afshar, Sardar, Sheykholislam, Taghli, Haji Ali, Komurchu, Gurju, Julfa, Haji Ilyas, etc. All these caravanserais had been obliterated. By the decision dated on May 29, 1918, Azerbaijan National Council (Milli Shura), as a result of a political compromise, ceded the city of Iravan to the Armenians as a capital city after three independent countries –Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia had been established in the Caucasus. The re-construction of the city Iravan after the first world war was started in 1924 but in fact, it was serving the agenda of erasing the historical heritage there. The Iravan City History Museum was located in Blue Mosque, Zal khan (the City) mosque turned to the art gallery, but all the other mosques except Demirbulag Mosque in the city had been razed to the ground. Demirbulag Mosque was set on fire in 1988.The history of the Iravan Khanate was written by the victors, first by Qajar conquerors and later by Russians, Armenians and finally by Pahlavis who removed Qajars from power. The Iravan Khanate was forgotten and its history was systematically erased.
 
Why was the history of the Iravan Khanate suppressed?
 
At the beginning of the Qajar dynasty there were only few trusted historians in Qajar court, explained Amir Ali SardariIravani . They described all events from the perspective of their master Agha Mohammad khan Qajar or Fathali shah Qajar. As said before, Iravan Khans tried to stabilize their country by switching from one neighboring supporter (Iran, Ottomans, Russia) to the other one based on their common interests. Agha Mohammad khan Qajar was actually an intelligent commander. He believed that all territories in Near and Middle East and Central Asia, even India, belong to Turkic tribes and must be ruled by them. I read a statement from him, added the scholar, that Turkic rulers of those countries should respect each other and should be peaceful to each other. But in case of Khanates he wanted to restore the Safavid territories under his flag. The Khanates could not trust him as a young newcomer.
 
So, despite of being from the same roots “Qajar”, the Iravan Khan refused to follow Agha Mohammad khan and Fathali Shah. It was the reason why the Qajar historians mentioned him as an unfaithful and incapable khan. After he was sent to exile and was replaced by loyal Husseinqulu Khan from Qazvin, the new Khan as a non-native governor needed a lot of publicity. He carried out some tax reforms. In the first Russian war Qajars lost a great part of Caucasus. Unfortunately Husseinqulu khan overestimated his military power. He provoked Russia and started the 2nd war, which ended in loss of Iravan. Qajar historians documented only one side of the story.
 
Fathali Shah Qajar and his successors respected Mahammad khan Iravani and his children. It was a respect combined with fear. The Iravani Khan was rich and influential. After death of Fathali Shah, the old Iravani Khan who was a middle ranked general made career again and got to the highest level in the army under Mohammad Shah Qajar. He married the daughter of Fathali Shah and his son married the sister of Mohammad Shah Qajar. Even the new chancellor of Iran „Mirza Aghasi“ was his old servant in Iravan. So it is obvious why the Qajar kings felt like being threatened by this family. Professor Abbas Amanat and some other historians mentioned the huge influence of Mohammad Hasan Khan Sardar Iravani (son of Mahammad khan Iravani) in Nasser-eddin Shah Qajar‘s era. The Pahlavis then systematically erased this history for political reasons.
 
The Implications for Further Research
 
This page of our history has been disregarded by censorship, continued the researcher. Through objective research the true history will be revealed. The history which goes beyond our current understanding of political borders remains in the archives for now. It will open us a horizon to find out the integrity of Christians and Muslims in a traditional society in 18th century, he underscored. It will teach us lessons about tolerance in a multi-cultural and multi-ethnic society and also how such civilized community could be abused for imperialistic purposes, posited the scholar.
 
Researchers in this area must understand several languages. The documents obtained from this period are partly in Persian, partly in Turkish, partly in Russian and partly in Armenian.
 
Several archives in Iravan, Nakhichevan, Russia, Iran, Georgia, Turkey and Azerbaijan contain many correspondents and documents from that time. Due to conflicts and political issues, such objective, comprehensive research does not currently seem to be possible unfortunately. I am pretty sure that such steps could uncover the mistreatments regarding the history of Iravan khanate.
 
According to Amir Ali SardariIravani, the most interested audience and supporters live in the Republic of Azerbaijan and Turkey. Most of them are refugees from Iravan or neighboring regions who have been displaced from their homeland. They try to keep their traditions and culture. Both governments support historical research, but extensive work requires an international network of researchers who can access archives anywhere without restrictions. Such a network could be orchestrated by a cultural organization in Europe, for example. Anur Ali SardariIravani proposed to start such an initiative in Germany but it’s on hold because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
 
This fascinating interview leaves the reader with at least as many questions as answers, to which the lodestar of research access has not yet waxed. But it also offers a treasure map with clues that can bring the scholars following the footsteps of Amir Ali SardariIravani, closer to unraveling the enigmas presented in this story, and to reaching the buried wealth of previously unknown history.
 
 
 
 
 

Putin, Erdogan discuss situation on Armenian-Azerbaijani border

TASS, Russia
Both sides said they are interested in settling the conflict situation only by peaceful means
© Alexey Nikolsky/Russia’s presidential press sercive/TASS

MOSCOW, July 28. /TASS/. The situation on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border was among the topics discussed over the phone by Russian and Turkish Presidents, Vladimir Putin and Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The two presidents stressed that there are no alternatives to diplomatic settlement of the conflict, the Kremlin press service said on Monday.

“The presidents exchanged views on the situation in the South Caucasus in the context of the aggravation of the situation on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border. Vladimir Putin stressed the importance of prevention of any actions promoting further escalation. Both sides said they are interested in settling the conflict situation only by peaceful means, through talks,” it said.

The leaders expressed readiness to coordinate efforts to stabilize the situation in the region. Putin and Erdogan also noted that “there are no alternatives to political and diplomatic settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict on the basis of the principles of international law in the interests of the peoples of Armenia and Azerbaijan,” the Kremlin said.

The presidents also touched upon a number of current issues of the bilateral agenda. “Thus, they gave a positive assessment of cooperation in combating the coronavirus infection, which has made it possible to partially resume regular air service between a number of Russian and Turkish cities from August 1,” the Kremlin said.

The Russian leader also congratulated his Turkish counterpart on the upcoming Kurban Bayrami holiday.

The conversation was initiated by the Turkish side.

The situation on the Azerbaijani-Armenian border escalated on July 12, when Azerbaijan said that the Armenian army had tried to attack Azerbaijan’s positions with use of artillery systems. Armenia, in turn, said the situation on the border had aggravated after Azerbaijan’s attempted attack. The situation on the border has been relatively calm since July 17, according to the sides.

The conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the highland region of Nagorno-Karabakh, a disputed territory that had been part of Azerbaijan before the Soviet Union break-up, but primarily populated by ethnic Armenians, broke out in February 1988 after the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region announced its withdrawal from the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic. In 1992-1994, tensions boiled over and exploded into large-scale military action for control over the enclave and seven adjacent territories after Azerbaijan lost control of them. Talks on the Nagorno-Karabakh settlement have been ongoing since 1992 under the OSCE Minsk Group, led by its three co-chairs – Russia, France and the United States.

Armenians in Greece protest against Azerbaijani aggression

Public Radio of Armenia

IDBank and Idram announce expansion of strategic partnership

Save

Share

 14:11,

Considering the efficiency of the partnership between IDBank and Idram, the companies announce the expansion of strategic partnership and offer joint digital new services to a wide range of users.

During today’s online presentation, the companies have presented “Rocket Line”, the innovative digital product.

“Today, with great pleasure, we present the new fruit of cooperation, Rocket Line. It is a digital tool in non-touch and online shopping field, which is a novelty in the Armenian market”, said Karen Nalbandyan, IDBank Business development director. According to him, Rocket Line can be called a revolutionary digital loan but more convenient and complete than we could imagine previously.

Grigori Yolyan, Idram Commercial director mentioned, that Rocket Line offers full payment freedom to the clients. “If the loan we all know restricts the list of stores where we could buy goods with credit, Rocket Line provides a wide choice: it works everywhere, where payment through Idram is possible: when using more than 300 services, paying via QR and NFC in more than 3000 points of sale and more than 300 online shops where payment through Idram is integrated.

At the presentation Rocket Line advantages were introduced:

  • Pre-established limit for the clients of both the Bank and Idram with possibility of increasing the limit,
  • There is no mandatory repayment schedule: the client gets a flexible tool for managing his financial means: it can be repaid when convenient, during 3 or 6 months as chosen,
  • We can pay with Rocket Line for everyday shopping, for such goods that could never be bought by credit before: paying the utilities, closing the bill at the café or shopping at supermarket.
  • Works both on application and web version,
  • The process is fast, doesn’t require additional documents from buyer or seller: everything is online and fast,
  • Easy to use: to pay through Idram or web version you just need to choose “pay after 3 months” or “pay after 6 months”.

While introducing product features, Tatevik Hovhannisyan, the head of Marketing department of the Bank mentioned, that Rocket Line gives an opportunity to Idram and IDBank customers to have personal limit (reserve amount) from IDBank in Idram application and on IDBanking.am online platform without any effort. “The minimal pre-established limit is AMD 10.000, at the Bank they call it a welcome limit and it is automatically given to the clients who have premium plus status of Idram. Personal limit can be used starting from AMD 3000 for shopping and payments, fully or partially”.

If you are not a client of IDBank, you can use the limit just by passing remote identification in Idram mobile app and becoming a Bank customer. There is also an opportunity to raise the limit: with a few steps in Idram app or on IDBanking.am platform, you can just press the button, apply to the Bank and in a few seconds get a personal limit of up to AMD 10 million, in accordance with your credit history and credibility.

Presentation participants mentioned that you can get the personal limit of Rocket Line with a few simple steps, the amount given to the user and the used amount will be visible in Idram app and on IDBanking.am platform, the repayment is as simple as getting the limit: everything is online, fast and convenient.

At the end of the presentation, the employees of the Bank and Idram tested the product.

You can read more about Rocket Line .

COMPANIES ARE CONTROLLED BY CBA

Mask cuts COVID-19 spread risk by 65%, experts say

Save

Share

 17:25,

YEREVAN, JULY 21, ARMENPRESS. Social distancing and wearing a mask prevent you from spreading COVID-19, but they also protect you from getting it, two experts explain in a discussion of coronavirus transmission, Armenpress reports citing the World Economic Forum website.

Dean Blumberg, chief of pediatric infectious diseases at the University of California and William Ristenpart, a professor of chemical engineering, have recently spoken out about the importance of masks.

The exports said wearing a mask helps to protect you and others from the spread of COVID-19, which is primarily transmitted by droplets.

“On the issue of masks, I’d like to restart—because we’ve learned a lot,” Blumberg says. “We’ve learned more due to research and additional scientific evidence. What we know now is that masks work and are very important.”

A range of new research on face coverings shows that the risk of infection to the wearer decreases by 65%, said Dean Blumberg.

There are two primary methods of coronavirus transmission, Blumberg and Ristenpart explain.

The first is via droplets a carrier expels, which are about one-third the size of a human hair but still large enough that we can see them. Masks create an effective barrier against droplets.

“Everyone should wear a mask,” Blumberg says. “People who say, ‘I don’t believe masks work,’ are ignoring scientific evidence. 

“People who don’t wear a mask increase the risk of transmission to everyone, not just the people they come into contact with. It’s all the people those people will have contact with. You’re being an irresponsible member of the community if you’re not wearing a mask”.

The second major coronavirus transmission method is via the aerosol particles we expel when we talk. Those are about 1/100th the size of a human hair and are more difficult to defend against. Social distancing and staying outdoors, where there is more air flow, are helpful, Blumberg and Ristenpart say.

In their comments and answers to questions from viewers, Blumberg and Ristenpart repeatedly made the point that research continues to support the fundamental methods to prevent spreading COVID-19: Wear masks, maintain social distance, and keep social interactions outdoors whenever possible.