‘2021 must become a year of restoration of our economic ambitions’, Armenian PM says

Save

Share

 15:54,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 15, ARMENPRESS. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan chaired a consultation today discussing the 2022 macro-economic framework, the PM’s Office told Armenpress.

“2020, also from the economic perspective, was a very problematic year not only due to the war, but also the novel coronavirus pandemic. We should clearly record that 2021 is going to be a year of restoration of our economic ambitions. We must specify the actions which will enable to overcome the difficulties and really restore the economic ambitions which we had as a result of the famous events in 2020.

We have many economic challenges, but we also have numerous opportunities. Of course, we firstly should focus on solving the humanitarian issues, but we must record that the trilateral statement signed in Moscow on January 11 and its possible implementation can create new economic opportunities for Armenia. We are inclined to fully use that opportunities, I repeat again – for not only restoring our economic ambitions, but also establishing higher bars”, Pashinyan said in his opening remarks.

Minister of Finance Atom Janjughazyan presented overall forecasts over the macro-economic framework and economic developments for 2020. He stated that due to the COVID-19 and the consequences of the recent war in Artsakh it would be better to start earlier the debates over the budgetary process.

A number of issues relating to the 2022 state budget draft, the drafting of 2022-2024 medium-run expenditure program, the economic policy, the economic growth forecasts, fiscal policy were discussed during the meeting.

Pashinyan noted that the quality of programs being implemented in 2021 will have an effect on the macro-economic framework of 2022.

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Human Rights Organization Labels Artsakh Conflict Genocide Against Armenian Christians

Jan 14 2021
01/14/2021 Armenia (International Christian Concern) – The president of Christian Solidarity International (CSI), a Christian human rights organization, has warned that the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia represents a genocide against Armenian Christians. CSI President Dr. John Eibner called the six-week war this past fall “an ongoing process of genocide” rooted in the Armenian Genocide of the early 20th century.
 
According to CSI, the Azerbaijani military is being aided by both the Turkish military and former ISIS fighters from Syria who are working as mercenaries against Armenia. International Christian Concern has also documented these reports of ISIS fighters being utilized by Turkey in the conflict, only adding to the anti-Armenian Christian sentiment of the violence. These fighters are not only targeting Armenian military personnel, but also civilians living in the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh (Armenian: Artsakh) region.
 
Although the conflict has captured the world’s attention in recent months, the religious underpinnings of the violence have largely been underreported. Armenia is the oldest Christian nation in the world, and its current population is more than 90 percent Armenian Apostolic Christians. On the other side, Turkey and Azerbaijan, the two aggressors against Armenia, are both over 95 percent Muslim.
 
The Turkish government has repeatedly perpetuated an attitude of conquest towards Christianity. One example last year was the conversion of the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul from a museum into a mosque, a move that was praised at its first Islamic service as a “sign of conquest.” Turkish media has been using similar rhetoric to describe the conflict with Armenia, only providing more evidence of genocidal behavior against Armenian Christians.

Opposition MP to Armenian authorities: Keep insisting that you have made significant achievements

Panorama, Armenia

Jan 12 2021
 
 
MP Edmon Marukyan from the opposition Bright Armenia faction referred to the claims of the Armenian authorities that the statement signed during the trilateral meeting in Moscow on Monday is also beneficial for Armenia.
 
“The authorities continue to insist that the new document signed in Moscow yesterday is in Armenia’s interests, as it will allow us to have a direct railway link with Russia through Azerbaijan, spreading false claims that it will be safe from now on,” he wrote on Facebook.
 
“I would like to underline that it will be going through the territory of Azerbaijan, a country that has not returned our prisoners of war and civilian captives so far, a country whose servicemen tortured and beheaded our soldiers and citizens with the Islamic State methods, not sparing even the elderly and the sick, as a result of the anti-Armenian policy of its authorities, as well as with their approval, a country that did not shy away from using terrorists against us, a country that shelled a maternity hospital, a church and, finally, a country whose soldier was glorified and rewarded at the highest level for axing to death our officer while he was asleep.
 
“Keep insisting that you have made significant achievements,” the opposition MP said.
 

Civil disobedience actions being held near Armenian PM Pashinyan’s residency

News.am, Armenia
Jan 10 2021
Civil disobedience actions being held near Armenian PM Pashinyan’s residency
Civil disobedience actions are being held near Pashinyan’s residency on Sunday.
 
The participants demand the PM reveal what he is going to sign during the meeting in Moscow, the Mediaport Telegram channel reported.
 
Armenian PM Nikol Pashinyan is scheduled to visit Moscow on Monday to meet with Russian president Vladimir Putin and Azerbaijani leader Ilham Aliyev. Pashinyan is also expected to hold a one-by-one meeting with Putin.

Mechanical approaches on determining state borders of Armenia should be simply ruled out – Ombudsman

Save

Share

 12:06, 9 January, 2021

YEREVAN, JANUARY 9, ARMENPRESS. Mechanical approaches on determining the state borders of Armenia should be just ruled out, Ombudsman of Armenia Arman Tatoyan said in a statement.

“The livestock building belonging to Shurnukh village resident Styopa Movsisyan, which is adjacent to his house, has been divided into 2 parts – “Azerbaijani” and “Armenian”, as a result of the use of the Global Positioning System (GPS) or Google Maps.

Moreover, the state registration of the ownership rights to both the house and the livestock building has been approved by the certificates of the Cadastre Committee of Armenia.

We have tried several versions of Google Maps in the area of that house, and each version showed different results, including presenting Styopa Movsisyan’s house and the whole Shurnukh village as part of Armenia.

Unfortunately, today such stories are numerous. Such concrete examples prove that as a result of approaches used till this moment for determining the borders, as well as due to the mechanical use of GPS or Google Map, and especially in the case of property and several other rights the rights of the bordering residents of Armenia have been grossly violated. People are unable to use their property even having the ownership certificates.

Therefore, such mechanical approaches on determining the state borders of Armenia, the processes with such speed should be just ruled out”, the Ombudsman said.

According to him, professional approaches, research results, proper legal grounds are needed.

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

How Azerbaijan Won the Karabakh War

Pulitzer Center
Jan 6 2021


There is a saying in Azerbaijan, the bigger your roof, the more snow falls on it. Last year, Azerbaijan’s roof grew significantly larger when it emerged victorious from a 44-day war against Armenia for control of the Nagorno-Karabakh enclave.

Both Azerbaijan and Armenia are nestled in the strategically important Caucasus Mountains, a region where Russia, Turkey, and Iran meet. Nagorno-Karabakh is a province whose very name exemplifies the tangled interests that have long vied for influence there: it’s an appellation that combines Slavic, Turkic, and Farsi words. And although Azerbaijan is surely the main beneficiary of its successful campaign to reclaim territory it lost during the first Karabakh war in the 1990s, observers have asked the question: Who among the outside powers of the region came out on top at the end of this most recent war?

Armenia’s capitulation on Nov. 9 makes it the clear loser in the conflict. As Azerbaijani forces took Shusha, a major city deep in the Karabakh heartland, Russian President Vladimir Putin used his influence in both the Azerbaijani and Armenian capitals to broker a deal that halted the Azerbaijani offensive and left ethnic-Armenians in control of a much-reduced slice of the region. Armenia was forced to give up its claim not just to areas that it lost in fighting, but also to several other districts of Azerbaijan that surround Karabakh, which Armenians had controlled since 1994. These areas were at the heart of Azerbaijan’s grievance against Armenia, because in the Soviet period they were populated mainly by ethnic-Azeris unlike Karabakh, which was and remained populated predominantly by ethnic-Armenians.

How did Azerbaijan get this far in a difficult and bloody fight that saw its troops ascend a well-fortified mountainous stronghold? It had help, mainly from its powerful ally Turkey. Ankara, which has been waging war in Syria for years, sent experienced military advisors to direct Baku’s war machine — a war machine fortified over the years with billions of dollars’ worth of modern weaponry purchased with its Caspian Sea oil bounty.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdoğan attended a victory parade in Baku together in December, where they watched the Azerbaijani military tow an array of captured Armenian military vehicles in varying states of disrepair through the city’s main square for public viewing. After this macabre display, the two leaders headed indoors to hold a press conference where Aliyev highlighted the role Turkish technology played in delivering a victory to his people. “The famous Bayraktar, which is made by the Turkish defense industry, was a gamechanger and played an important role in our success,” he said of a drone that has already been used to deadly effect by Turkey in its campaigns in Syria and against Kurdish insurgents in eastern Turkey for much longer.

In Karabakh, its use shifted the balance of power in a war that pitted two nation states against each other. The Bayraktar, along with other drones Azerbaijan has purchased in recent years, wiped out Armenia’s high-ground advantage. After all, a drone can surpass the highest mountain. The sound alone is enough to cause panic, which is something I experienced while reporting for PBS NewsHour from the streets of Armenian-controlled Stepanakert in October. As the motor from an unmanned aerial vehicle whirred above us, we had to cut short our interview and lead our interview subject, who is partially blind, to the relative safety of a bombed-out garage. The effect it had on us was paralyzing — even without an attack.

For all the crucial assistance it provided, Turkey itself did not increase its physical footprint in the region, despite the fact that just a week after the ceasefire had been reached, Erdoğan addressed his country’s parliament to announce a Turkish peacekeeping force was on its way to Karabakh. But it never materialized. One country did, however, increase its footprint: Russia, the power that most recently ruled both Armenia and Azerbaijan and, incidentally, was the only major arms supplier to have sold copious amounts of weaponry to both sides.

Under the agreement Putin brokered, he secured a role for nearly 2,000 Russian peacekeepers to patrol the areas of Karabakh that remain populated by Armenians. Their purpose, seemingly, is to shield Armenians against further hostilities from jubilant Azerbaijani troops, who overran roughly a third of Karabakh in October and November. Many of those soldiers, who had been born long after the end of the first war, encountered ethnic-Armenians for the first time. Everything they knew about these strangers came from state propaganda that has declared Armenia to be a fascist state and Armenians to be bloodthirsty murderers. In retrospect, what happened next seems almost inevitable. Those Armenians who were foolish enough to remain in their homes or too frail to leave were put to the sword. In some cases, literally.

In one cellphone video verified by Amnesty International, an Azerbaijani serviceman holds down a struggling elderly man, while another soldier hands his comrade a knife. In accented Azeri, the old man cries for mercy: “For the sake of Allah, I beg you,” he says repeatedly. The video ends abruptly as the soldier begins to cut his throat. In another video, a group of Azerbaijani troops hold down a shirtless younger man as a soldier decapitates him with a knife. The incident was met with loud cheers and clapping from the crowd at the scene.

Azerbaijan’s reconquest puts the onus on Baku to deal with its alleged war criminals decisively and swiftly if it wants to hold the moral high ground in what has been described as a patriotic war for liberation. A recent announcement by the Prosecutor General’s office that four soldiers had been arrested for mutilating the bodies of Armenia’s war dead and desecrating Armenian tombstones does not go far enough as long as more serious offenders go free.

Why is it so urgent that Azerbaijan prosecute war criminals? Aside from the moral issue that demands human rights be upheld, Aliyev wants the world to believe that he intends to rule Karabakh and the surrounding areas justly and for the benefit of both communities. “We see Karabakh as a prosperous, safe, secure area of Azerbaijan where people live in peace and dignity, where Azerbaijani and Armenian communities live side by side,” he said in one of his many televised addresses from the past couple of months.

That’s a claim that’s going to seem like posturing and will be hard to take seriously until ethnic-Armenian civilians are allowed to return to areas they have fled. Moreover, it’s unlikely they’ll even want to return before Azerbaijan demonstrates to its armed forces that it cannot commit violence against civilians with impunity. Speaking about the authorities of both Azerbaijan and Armenia, Rachel Denber, a deputy director at Human Rights Watch, told Newlines: “It’s imperative as a deterrent to ensure that these crimes don’t repeat to send a very strong signal throughout the chain of command from the highest level to the lowest level that these kinds of actions will not be tolerated and that they will be vigorously punished.”

All this is to say that some kind of peacekeeping force is necessary to prevent further harm to civilians. That this role fell to Russia speaks to the growing influence it has in its former domains. The presence of its troops on Azerbaijani territory represents a reestablishment of a Russian military presence in all three south Caucasus republics of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia for the first time since the end of the Soviet Union. It’s a big win for Russia, a state that seeks influence for its own sake, which now has a powerful lever with which to wield it. As the arbiter between Armenia and Azerbaijan for at least the next five years, both countries will have to run major decisions regarding Karabakh and beyond through Moscow first. The same cannot be said of NATO-member Turkey, which shares a 193-mile-long border with Armenia but gained no foothold there as a result of this war, even if it did enhance its partnership with Azerbaijan.

While Azerbaijanis are happy a significant amount of territory has been returned to their country’s control, some are concerned that they’ve traded Armenian occupation for a Russian presence. “At minimum, Russia is a country that helps Armenia,” complained Elnur Aliyev, a resident of Baku. “If Turkey came, yes, but I don’t approve of Russian peacekeepers.” Higher up the food chain, Azerbaijani officials are more diplomatic about Russian involvement. “In Azerbaijan we have a presence of Russian forces, based on the practical mandate. This mandate is about a peacekeeping mission. It’s not about any kind of military base,” a top aide to President Aliyev, Hikmat Hajiyev, told me in November.

However, no such diplomacy was on display for Armenia, which Hajiyev said should investigate its own alleged war crimes, like the throat-cutting of a captured Azerbaijani border guard that was documented in the same Amnesty report. That seems an unlikely prospect at present, given Armenia’s chaotic circumstances in which its society is looking for someone to blame for the lost war and the lost lands.

Things are very different in Baku. With the political capital Aliyev has won as a result of the war, his administration could easily survive the backlash that would undoubtedly follow if severe prison sentences are handed down to servicemen.

It remains to be seen if Azerbaijan will prosecute those allegedly responsible for the killing of civilians and prisoners of war. While Baku might be more interested in staging victory parades right now, there’s still a lot of snow left to be cleared from its roof. And without a robust reconciliation process, it’s unlikely the Armenian and Azeri communities will be able to live side by side or that the peace will be lasting, irrespective of Russian peacekeepers’ presence in the region.



Everything known about Armenian PoWs in Azerbaijan

JAM News
Dec 28 2020

    Sona Martirosyan, Yerevan
 

Thousands of people are grieving the loss of loved ones in Armenia following recent fighting in Karabakh, while others remain in a suspended state of uncertainty as they do not know what happened to their relatives: whether they are in captivity, killed or are hiding on territories that are now under Azerbaijani control.

Below: everything that is known as of the time of publication about Armenian prisoners of war in Azerbaijan, the process of trying to get them home and the search for the missing.


  • Reports surface of more Armenian servicemen captured in Karabakh despite truce
  • No more prisoners? Azerbaijan, Armenia claim ‘all for all’ prisoner exchange completed
  • Post-War Syndrome: how is Armenia experiencing the surrender?


“God saved me”

Hovsep Sahakyan was on the front line for only a day, but during this time he managed to go through all the horrors of the war.

“On October 16 I was summoned to the enlistment office and was told that I should go to the front. I said that I am the pastor of the Seventh-day Adventist Church and I cannot take up arms to kill people. However, I did not refuse to go to the front, because there is a lot of work that I can do: dig trenches, help the wounded. The military registration and enlistment office, of course, agreed,” says Hovsep.

He underwent a retraining course and on October 24 arrived in Kubatlu, where he was immediately sent to an outpost A few minutes later, a rocket attack began.

Many of Hovsep’s colleagues died or were injured that day. During a short pause, he and other military personnel evacuated the wounded and took them to hospital. A few minutes later, a new shelling began, as a result of which Hovsep himself received a shrapnel wound in the leg. The wound was deep; he had to be taken to the hospital.

“We drove only 3-4 km when I heard the sound of a drone. In an attempt to avoid being hit, our car rolled into a gorge. When I came to, I realized that everyone in the car had died, and that I had dislocated my already-wounded leg. Immediately I thought that the drone would try to blow up the car, and jumped out of it. I crawled 4-5 meters, and a bomb fell next to the car, but did not explode. Then four more bombs flew into the car. I thought that the end had come for me, but God saved my life,” Hovsep recalls.

With his wounded leg, without food or water, Hovsep spent three days in the gorge. At night he tried to crawl uphill, and during the day he lay motionless so that he would not be noticed.

“On the third day, I crawled to the road along which cars were passing. I hid again, as I thought that they might be Azerbaijanis. On the road I noticed an Armenian ambulance, corpses around. I decided to wait until nightfall.

But I was noticed before dark by Azerbaijanis. My first thought was that they would kill me, but at the same time I thought: it was not for nothing that God saved me from so many troubles,” he says.

He spent the first 14 of 50 days in captivity in Baku, and they were the most difficult:

“You all know how prisoners are treated. They even tried to kill me. In captivity, I thought about my family – my wife and baby daughter. On the one hand, it helped not to break down, but sometimes these very thoughts caused despair.”

Data on Armenian prisoners

Hovsep is one of 44 prisoners of war who returned to Armenia on December 14. Of these, 30 are servicemen, 14 are civilians. Six of those who returned were captured before the second Karabakh war in previous years.

After the end of hostilities, 53 prisoners returned to Armenia, and the body of an elderly man who died in Azerbaijani captivity was also handed over.

“The return of the prisoners took place several times. One elderly woman was returned in October, 44 prisoners – on December 14. After that, there were two more cases of returns. We also know about the death of two people, the body of one of them was transferred to the Armenian side, the other was not. Both are 80-year-olds who were killed in an Azerbaijani prison,” said former Nagorno-Karabakh ombudsman Artak Beglaryan.

Action in Yerevan demanding the return of the prisoners. Photo by JAMnews

The return of prisoners of war and other detained persons is regulated not only by the principles of humanitarian law, but also by the 8th paragraph of the joint statement of the leaders of Armenia, Russia and Azerbaijan, signed on November 9. In addition, the parties have formally stated that they had agreed on the exchange of “all for all”.

Human rights activists in Armenia say there are as many as 150 Armenian prisoners, but Azerbaijan does not confirm the presence of such a number of people on its territory.

At the European Court of Human Rights

The interests of 78 Armenian prisoners in the European Court of Human Rights are represented by lawyers Siranush Sahakyan and former Minister of Justice of Armenia Artak Zeynalyan.

“The principle of ‘all for all’ is violated by Azerbaijan, as they simply hide information about these people. They are not provided either to the parties to the negotiations or to the relevant international organizations, while the Armenian side presented irrefutable evidence to the ECHR regarding 50 people. But even in this case, Azerbaijan will possibly delay the process”, Siranush Sahakyan says.

According to her, it is difficult to work out the exact number of prisoners, since serious work is being done on each of them, the collection of documents: and only if all the evidence is available do the lawyers turn to the ECHR so as not to weaken the position of the Armenian side.

Despite the fact that Azerbaijan has not confirmed the fact of captivity many Siranush Sahakyan hopes that under the pressure of irrefutable evidence, ultimately, Baku will have to admit the truth and to organize their return to their homeland.

The rally in Yerevan, the participants brought photographs of prisoners and missing relatives. Photo by JAMnews

Red Cross mission

Almost every day there are queues of visitors in front of the Yerevan office of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Dozens of citizens who are looking for their relatives come here with their photos and videos from Azerbaijani social media and ask for help.

The number of people who have been addressed by ICRC staff these days has not been made public, says communications program manager Zara Amatuni:

“Only after confirmation from the country about the presence and maintenance of these people on their territory can the Red Cross can apply to visit them. After receiving confirmation, the ICRC conducts personal meetings with each prisoner, checks the conditions of their detention, helps to contact their family members. However, the details of these processes cannot be made public, and the decisions on the exchange are made exclusively by the parties.”

She recalls that the ICRC delegation plays the role of a facilitator with an advisory function and facilitates dialogue between the parties.

The organization has never disclosed and is not going to disclose information about the wanted or suspected prisoners, since “communication with the parties is carried out on the principle of confidentiality.”

At the same time, Zara Amatuni assures that the ICRC does not ignore any appeal, and the main task of the organization at this moment is to avoid the disappearance of the alleged prisoners.

About the missing

The search for the missing and the bodies of those killed in the war zone began on November 13, but hundreds of families still have not received any information about their relatives.

For more than a month, families of the missing have been holding protests outside the Ministry of Defense, various military units and the government building to get the attention of the authorities. They have one desire – to get at least some information about their relatives.

According to official information, there are 1,600 missing from the Armenian side.

Parents of some of them are sure that their children are in captivity – there are photographs and videos confirming this.

Human rights activist Artak Beglaryan notes that search work is sometimes complicated by weather conditions and difficult to access areas. However, there are also subjective factors:

“In some cases, searches are deliberately delayed, since the main hostilities took place in those territories that are currently under the control of Azerbaijan.

Often, during searches in these areas, not a single body is found, which suggests that the Azerbaijani side, before giving permission for search work, manages to remove the bodies of our soldiers from the territory and hide them. In addition, the Azerbaijani side does not name the exact number of prisoners of war, which would make it possible to make some assumptions about their fate. “

So far, as a result of search work, 1,073 bodies have been found.

As a result of protracted protests, the relatives of the missing managed to obtain permission to personally participate in the search – as part of the relevant detachments.

A protest action demanding the return of the prisoners. Photo by JAMnews

Is the Geneva Convention functioning?

The Geneva Convention on the Treatment of Prisoners of War clearly states not only the rules for the humane treatment of captured and arrested civilians, but also that the prisoners must be returned immediately after the end of hostilities.

All this time, the Armenian side has been demanding to pay attention to the artificial delay by Azerbaijan of the process of having prisoners of war returned home and the inhuman attitude towards them.

Over the past two months, the offices of the ombudsmen of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh have prepared six reports on the torture and ill-treatment of Armenian prisoners.

“We have factual confirmation of 21 deaths of prisoners and civilians in the territories that came under the control of Azerbaijan. In all cases, traces of torture and mutilation were recorded, including after death. Cases of inhuman treatment and torture towards the elderly, including executions, have also been proven. Cases of decapitation of living people – two elderly and two servicemen – are known, there were also cases of cutting off the ears of living people.

The inhumane attitude and cruelty are evidenced not only by the results of the examination of the body of an elderly prisoner handed over to the Armenian side, but also by those who returned from captivity. According to them, the captives and other detained persons, including women, were subjected to inhuman treatment, the overwhelming majority – physical violence, absolutely everything – psychological,” Artak Beglaryan says.

He emphasizes that all of these cases are reported and supported by an impressive evidence base.

The former NK ombudsman is sure that the dissemination of videos and photographs in Azerbaijani social networks testifying to the inhuman attitude towards the prisoners and the bodies of the dead, the delay in the process of returning the prisoners is aimed at exacerbating the tension in Armenia, causing pain and suffering to the Armenian society.

The General Prosecutor’s Office of Armenia has also documented all these cases and is preparing to transfer the collected information to international partners in order to initiate criminal prosecution and protect the rights of the victims.

Captivity – after the end of hostilities

The information about the capture of 62 servicemen in peacetime in two villages of the Hadrut region, which came under the control of Azerbaijan, was officially confirmed.

Baku confirmed that they are in jail. The list of prisoners by name has already been handed over to the command of the Russian peacekeepers, which acts as an intermediary in the exchange of prisoners.

The number of civilians captured in “peaceful conditions”, according to various sources, is more than ten.

About a week ago, lawyer Artak Zeynalyan, who represents the interests of the prisoners at the ECHR, said that soon another group would return to Armenia. But the process of returning the prisoners was postponed. Their relatives do not know who will enter the new group, everyone is waiting for his own.

And Hovsep, who managed, despite everything, to survive and return, says that every day he prays for the prisoners and hopes that they will soon return home.


Toponyms and terminology used in the publication, and views, opinions and strategies they contain do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of JAMnews or any employees thereof. JAMnews reserves the right to delete comments it considers to be offensive, or otherwise unacceptable.

https://jam-news.net/return-of-prisoners-actions-of-the-armenian-side-armenia-karabaartsakh-position-of-azerbaijan/

Armenia Ombudsman: Citizens’ call to threaten or use violence against pastor in Sisian is absolutely

News.am, Armenia
Dec 21 2020
 
 
Armenia Ombudsman: Citizens’ call to threaten or use violence against pastor in Sisian is absolutely inadmissible
15:19, 21.12.2020
Human Rights Defender of Armenia Arman Tatoyan has issued the following statement:
 
“The calls and news of a group of people about the threats and violence against pastor of the St. Gregory the Illuminator Church of Sisian are absolutely inadmissible.
 
The monitoring conducted by the Office of the Human Rights Defender attests to the fact that this dangerous phenomenon has been recorded a few times in the past.
 
These manifestations must be immediately prevented. This is first and foremost dangerous from the perspective of tolerance and solidarity in society.
 
The Armenian Holy Apostolic Church has had and still has an exceptional mission in the lives of the Armenian people and for preservation of national identity. The Armenian Holy Apostolic Church has always played a role in human rights protection and in the establishment of an atmosphere for solidarity in the country.
 
It is the duty of state bodies to take immediate steps to verify the news and rule out any tension and especially any potential act of violence.
 
A little while ago, I talked to the Chief of Police of Armenia who fully assured me that the Police will urgently take the necessary steps to prevent tension or violence.”
 
  
 

Moderna expects its COVID-19 vaccine to protect against UK coronavirus variant

Save

Share

 15:02, 24 December, 2020

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 24, ARMENPRESS. Moderna Inc said on Wednesday it expects that the immunity induced by its COVID-19 vaccine would be protective against the coronavirus variants reported in the UK, Reuters reports.

The company said it plans to run tests to confirm the vaccine’s activity against any strain.

Moderna’s comments came amid the British government’s plan to place huge swathes of England under its strictest COVID-19 restrictions as a highly infectious virus variant sweeps the country.

The U.S.-based company said it would be performing additional tests of the vaccine in the coming weeks to confirm its expectation.

Azerbaijani forces indiscriminately targeted journalists during the Karabakh war – Report

Panorama, Armenia
Dec 25 2020
Society 14:34 25/12/2020NKR

The Ombudsmen of the Republic of Artsakh and Armenia published on December 18 a joint ad hoc report on the attacks of journalists by Azerbaijan, covering the hostilities in Artsakh, the Human Rights Defender’s Office reported. 

In parallel with the targeting of the civilian population and infrastructures of Artsakh, journalists and their service vehicles were also targeted deliberately and indiscriminately as a result of which 7 journalists (5 foreigners and 2 Armenians) were injured and one person convoying the journalistic group was killed. According to the source, deliberate targeting is testified by the fact that journalists were wearing uniforms and distinctive signs that were also present on their cars. 

Besides, some evidence suggests that Azerbaijani reconnaissance UAVs were flying at the scene before and during the strikes which means that the journalists were fully visible and distinct by the Azerbaijani armed forces.