PM Pashinyan sends congratulatory messages to President and Prime Minister of the Russia, as well as to the CIS leaders

Save

Share

 11:14, 9 May, 2022

YEREVAN, MAY 9, ARMENPRESS. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan sent congratulatory messages to the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin and the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Mikhail Mishustin on the occasion of the 77th anniversary of the Victory, ARMENPRESS was informed from the Office of the Prime Minister.

The congratulatory message addressed to Vladimir Putin runs as follows,

“Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich,

I cordially congratulate you on the anniversary of the victory in the Great Patriotic War.

Today we remember with boundless gratitude all those who have made a decisive contribution to peace, we honor our dear veterans and the homefront workers. Their heroism and unparalleled feat will remain in our hearts forever.

The memory of the great past obliges us to strengthen our inherited friendly ties, to comprehensively develop the Armenian-Russian relations for the benefit of the peoples of our countries.

Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich,

On this memorable day let me wish you and the people of Russia good health, peace and prosperity.”

The congratulatory message to Mikhail Mishustin reads as follows,

“Dear Mikhail Vladimirovich,

I cordially congratulate you on the anniversary of the victory in the Great Patriotic War.

The immortal feat of our fathers and grandfathers, all those who fought heroically shoulder to shoulder on the battlefield, selflessly worked in the homefront will forever remain in our hearts.

The memory of the great victory obliges us to strengthen our inherited friendly ties, to comprehensively develop the Armenian-Russian relations for the benefit of our peoples.

Dear Mikhail Vladimir,

On this remarkable day, let me wish you good health, happiness, new success, and peace and prosperity to the Russian people”.

On the occasion of May 9, the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia sent congratulatory messages to the leaders of the CIS member states – President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko, President of Turkmenistan Serdar Berdimuhamedow, President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, President of Kyrgyzstan Sadyr Japarov, President of Tajikistan Emomali Rahmon, President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev, as well as the first President of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia Dmitry Medvedev.

Food: Gray and Gray is hosting an Armenian takeover by Tom Sarafian

Australia – May 6 2022
 May 6 2022 at 4:56 PM


Chef and condiment king, Tom Sarafian, is about to embark on a two-and-a-half week residency at Gray and Gray Bread and Wine in Northcote, cooking the food of his Armenian heritage with a focus on autumn flavours.

From May 12 to 29, Sarafian will flip the restaurant’s menu from Georgian and Russian fare into the food of his father’s family, headlined by quince-glazed suckling pig cooked over charcoal with smoked chestnuts.

The 14-dish feast is an all-new menu for Sarafian. It opens with a fleet of six mezze, then moves on to tiny mante (dumplings) that Sarafian’s grandmother used to make. Baked in the oven and finished with warm tomato sauce, their final texture is similar to a pot-sticker, with one crunchy side and one steamed side.

“These are things I’ve wanted to cook for a long time and haven’t found the right place or time,” says Sarafian. “But Gray and Gray feels like the perfect place to do that [because] of Boris’s knowledge when it comes to that kind of food.”Armenia shares a border with Georgia, a touchpoint of Gray & Gray’s menu, thanks to co-owner Boris Portnoy’s time there making wine.

The drinks list will celebrate Armenia’s 6000-year-old culture of fermented drinks, which stretches nearly as far back as Georgia’s.

May 12-29, Wed-Sat from 6pm, Sun from noon.

Gray and Gray Bread and Wine, 188 High Street, Northcote; $80 for four courses (pescatarian and vegetarian menus available), 0434 618 331, breadandwine.com.au


Aram I urges courage to reject deal threatening Karabakh security

PanARMENIAN
Armenia – May 5 2022

PanARMENIAN.Net – Catholicos of the Great House of Cilicia Aram I has said that the people of Nagorno-Karabakh have the courage to reject any proposal that could threaten the security of the Armenians of Artsakh (Karabakh).

“We must have the courage, and the people of Artsakh have the courage to reject any offer, coercion or agreement that could threaten the security of the Armenians of Artsakh and to question the will of the people of Artsakh to freely express their will,” the Catholicos said in a tweet on Wednesday, May 3.

Karabakh President Arayik Harutyunyan said Tuesday that his government was not going to deviate from the principle of the right of peoples to self-determination.

Days earlier, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said that the number one beneficiary of the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is Artsakh and its people, which means nothing can be negotiated implemented in secret. According to the Prime Minister, the agenda of peace is aimed at overcoming the difficulties that followed the war, to guarantee the security, the rights and the future of the people.

Armenian roads could be used as transit routes to connect Uzbekistan with Europe

Save

Share

 16:42, 3 May, 2022

YEREVAN, MAY 3, ARMENPRESS. The Deputy Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructures Armen Simonyan received an Uzbekistani official delegation led by the Deputy Minister of Transport Jasurbek Choriyev. The delegation included the Uzbek ministry’s Head of the Department of International Relations, Logistics and Exports Developments Mamanbi Omarov and Chief Expert for Aviation Transport Development Sator Satorov.

Simonyan emphasized the importance of carrying out direct flights between Armenia and Uzbekistan and presented Armenia’s strategic directions and prospects in the air, railway and automobile transportation sector.

The Uzbek delegation expressed interest in being involved in the Armenian aviation market, noting that the Uzbek airlines want to carry out flights to Armenia but lack necessary resources due to overloaded work. In response, the Armenian authorities presented information on the Armenian airlines, both active and upcoming, and expressed readiness to encourage partnership between the airlines and the Uzbek side.

The possibilities of using the roads of Armenia as a transit route and connecting Uzbekistan with Europe were discussed.

Simonyan said the sides will continue to actively cooperate and it is possible that the dynamically developing relations will be strengthened with an inter-governmental agreement.

Ongoing protests could serve as background for attempted coup – Garegin Miskaryan

ARMINFO
Armenia – May 2 2022
David Stepanyan

ArmInfo.The ongoing protests in Armenia’s capital and other cities and towns could serve as a background for an attempted coup and for showing alleged widespread  discontent with Armenia’s authorities and, therefore, a popular  demand for a change of power, the public and political figure Garegin  Miskaryan said in an interview with ArmInfo. 

“Protests as such will not bring about any changes. And they will die  down in the course of time if they are not accompanied with an  attempted coup. And even if such an attempt is made, it will have  nothing in common with the protests. In any case, an attempted coup  cannot be ruled out, and such the primary reason for such a  possibility is lack of reforms in the system of government. The  security agencies to name a few, the same personnel with the same  system of values in the same heads,” he said.

In this context, Mr Miskaryan believes an attempted coup and Armenia  backsliding to authoritarian and later to oligarchic rule is highly  probable. Moreover, the incumbent government’s steps demonstrate  Armenia is moving toward a new oligarchy, but with different  oligarchs. 

In this context, the present authorities-opposition struggle both in  Parliament and in the streets is a struggle for “redistribution of  capital” between the former owners and the new elite. And the fact  that this struggle does not contain a single hint at any ideological  component is evidence that “all is fair” in this “war,” which is only  making a change of power by means of a coup more probable.

“Not a single hint at the defense of national interests in this  struggle, which is being claimed by some.  Rather, it is a struggle  for power. And no steps have ever been made toward increasing  sovereignty, justice, democracy in Armenia under either the former or  incumbent authorities. After Armenia’s transition from electoral  authoritarianism to electoral democracy in 2018, we are backsliding  to electoral authoritarianism again for a number of objective and  subjective reasons. But a real democratic state has remained a  dream,” Mr Miskaryan said. 

Human Rights Defender slams police for excessive force, failure to read rights upon arrest

Save

Share

 09:54, 29 April, 2022

YEREVAN, APRIL 29, ARMENPRESS. The Ombudsperson Kristinne Grigoryan dispatched rapid response teams to several police precincts of the Yerevan Police Department for a monitoring in relation to the arrests of demonstrators.

The Ombudsperson’s representatives had private conversations with 35 arrested citizens and studied the footages of their detention. 7 of the 35 detained individuals are minors, one of whom is 13 years old.

According to eyewitness accounts, 4 police officers detained the 13 year old, while the others were detained by 4-6 police officers each.

When police officers were detaining the 13-year-old, some of the demonstrators informed the police officers that they are detaining a minor, however the police officers did not take it into account. The 13-year-old was subsequently released from the police department without administrative proceedings.

The Ombudsperson’s office said that in some cases, upon detaining the demonstrators, police officers failed to notify the demonstrators on the grounds of their detention, failed to notify their rights (right to an attorney, right to remain silent, right to a phone call and other rights), and used excessive force.

In addition, in some precincts police failed to properly book the detained.

Those detained included Alexan Tumasyan, an attorney who was arrested by police as a demonstrator but who informed the officers that he wasn’t taking part in the protests but was there to represent one of his clients.

The Ombudsperson’s office said the recorded issues are now being summed up and necessary measures will be taken.

“The Human Rights Defender is noting that the procedure of administrative arrest conducted by police officers is carried out with manifestations of gross violations of several rights and freedoms. Particularly, the police officers’ failure to issue any lawful order, failure to explain the grounds for arrest, failure to read basic rights, and the use of excessive force is of continues nature. Based on this, the Human Rights Defender is calling upon the Police of Republic of Armenia to display duly and lawful conduct while carrying out their duty and ensure the possibility of the exercise of the basic rights of detained individuals,” the Ombudsperson’s office said in a statement, adding that they continue 24/7 monitoring, including in terms of “extreme and dangerous speech”.

The Role of the Great Powers in the Asia Minor Catastrophe

The National Herald
By Julian McBride

This year marks the 100-year commemoration of the failed Greek war against the Kemalists of the now Republic of Turkey. It also marks the subsequent final phase of the genocide against the remaining Greek population of Eastern Thrace and Asia Minor once the Hellenic army was forced to withdraw amidst a large-scale counteroffensive by the Turkish military that did not spare soldier or civilian in their wrath. Though the war is largely known in history as the Greco-Turkish War, other factors came into play that brought about the end of 3,000 years of Hellenism in the region. Those factors were the Great Powers of World War One; the allies who attempted to carve up their own regions of the Ottoman Empire. Countries such as Britain, France, and Italy now held territory in Asia Minor after the Treaty of Sevres while the United States and Soviet Union also looked on and played a major role later. These powers promised to protect the already persecuted religious minorities such as the Greeks and Armenians, but instead played a larger role in the Catastrophe. Many descendants to this day still ponder over the wounds.

Italy

Italian roots of having their own zone of control in Asia Minor date to 1915. The Entente (British, French, and Russian Empires) promised the Italian Empire a piece of the Ottoman Empire in return for fighting alongside them. Italy had taken the Dodecanese isles in the Aegean after the Italian-Turkish War of 1912 and they looked to expand their Mediterranean foothold in the Antalya region, in which the economically rich southwestern ports of Anatolia were promised to them after the Great War. The Hellenic Kingdom was not supportive of Italy’s claims to Antalya, which had a large Greek minority as Greece looked to expand into ancestral homelands along the Anatolian coastline (the ‘Magali Idea’). Italy had also wanted Smyrna, which was now a Greek mandate and had an overwhelmingly Greek population for 3,000 plus years. As diplomatic tensions between the two states rose, the Venizelos attempted to mend diplomatic tensions by proposing more Italian influence in Albania in return for more Greek influence in their mandate and the Dodecanese. Though Venizelos’ offer was enticing, Italy decided to back Mustafa Kemal’s insurgency against the mandates and the subsequent Greco-Turkish War, which led to Turkish forces later taking the mandate areas and expelling and killing the remaining Greek population of Antalya.

France

In order to entice France into supporting a partition of the Ottoman Empire, Britain would lay the seeds of the Sykes-Picot Agreement, giving France large portions of Cilicia, Alexandretta, and the Levant. As the Kemalists had vehemently rejected the Treaty of Sevres, they started their war for control of Asia Minor with the French mandate of Cilicia. The mandate had a large Armenian and smaller Greek population, but France had proposed an Armenian homeland in the area for the remaining Christians. France was beaten and slowly withdrew from their positions, leaving many Greeks and Armenians to flee by ports along Mersin to the French mandates in Syria and Lebanon. Feeling they weren’t given enough for being a part of the Entente, France signed a separate document with the Turkish National Assembly, recognizing their claims on all of Asia Minor, superseding the Sevres document Sultan Mehmed Hadi Pasha signed. Paris’ breakaway from the mandates and subsequent withdrawal from the Dardanelles left the British overextended and sealed the fate of any type of aid going to the Hellenic Kingdom in the Asia Minor campaign.

Britain

As the British were largely responsible for the capitulation of the Ottoman Empire, using marginalized ethnic groups to fight for them from Gaza to Damascus, they now had figure out how to maintain security in the Middle East. The British maintained administration in the international demilitarized zone of Constantinople and much of the Dardanelles. They also now had administration in Mandatory Palestine and Mesopotamia. As nationalist forces inside of Asia Minor began their insurgency for full control over the Anatolian plateau, the British decided to back local forces, such as Greek irregulars and the Hellenic military in their quest to quell Kemal’s insurgency. These plans changed largely thanks to the British Parliament and Prime Minister David Lloyd George who refused to reinforce British forces in the region due to political tensions at home, but also for other nefarious purposes. Originally, the Russian Empire was the third half of the Entente but they found themselves in a civil war in 1917 against the communists led by Vladimir Lenin. The communists won the civil war and revolutionary fever was growing around the world from it. The Bolsheviks poured in weapons to not only the Kemalists, but also instigated conflicts in the Middle East and revealed the British betrayal of ethnic groups in the region, and Lloyd George’s cabinet was on the verge of collapse. In order to keep the highly prized Asia Minor region out of communist influence, the UK had quietly allowed the Kemalists to continue their rampage when they saw that the nationalist forces were most likely going to win. As highlighted in the book ‘A Peace to End all Peace,’ the British even went as far as to block the overextended Hellenic forces from entering Constantinople, their gamble on an alliance with London a failure.

Soviet Union

The Bolsheviks arguably played the greatest role in the Asia Minor catastrophe. Looking to secure a permanent foothold in the Caucasus and absorb the newly independent states there, Vladimir Lenin sent nearly endless amounts of weaponry to the Kemalists in their war against the Greeks. Both the Turkish nationalist forces and the Soviets jointly invaded the Caucasus, with the Soviets fully incorporating Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan into their control. The Kemalists annexed Western Armenia after Kemal realized the Americans wouldn’t be able to protect their proposed mandate, as the U.S. Senate voted against it and Washington’s policies were to continue being isolationists. Ideologically different, both the Soviets and Kemalists had similar interests in their quest to expel western forces – Mustafa Kemal in order to establish his own authoritarian republic and Vladimir Lenin to spread the influence of communism. This caused panic, primarily in the British Empire as the Soviets attempted to uproot British colonial rule thought diplomatic efforts.

After all this, the Hellenic Kingdom was now doomed to fail. For Lenin’s unwavering support, Mustafa Kemal ordered a bust to be made of him which was set up in Taksim Square, Constantinople, which to this day, can be seen as a provocative act in the historical Greek Orthodox city.

Allied Abandonment at Smyrna

Once the Hellenic army was pushed back by the Kemalists into Smyrna on September 1922, many Greeks and Armenians of the city, along with Greek refugees from Asia Minor, expected evacuation before the sack of the city. The allied command of the United States, British, French, and Italian forces were given strict orders from their high command not to dock their ships into Smyrna and save the hundreds of thousands of people trapped in the city. The U.S. High Commissioner of to Turkey, Admiral Mark Bristol did not even try to hide his racist views towards Christian minorities in the region and was very pro Kemalist. He was one of the officers in charge who gave the orders to his men not to intervene in the slaughter of Smyrna and evacuation of refugees. The British, French, and Italians at this time realized Mustafa Kemal had won and the only way to placate the new Turkish nation was to stay idle and not intervene in Smyrna, even if they would be responsible for the blood of 100,000-120,000 Greeks and Armenians of the rich port city. Out of the nations present with naval ships to save refugees, only the Hellenic Kingdom and Imperial Japan docked their ships in the port to evacuate as many people as possible. The great powers of the world had effectively left their Christian ‘brethren’ to die and one of the first Greek colonies in Asia Minor founded 3,000 years ago, was set ablaze. The Burning of Smyrna marked the end of 3,000 plus years of Hellenism in Asia Minor.

As the descendants of the Greek Genocide survivors reflect on the centennial of the collapse of the Asia Minor campaign, we remember who stood for the plight of the Greeks and who watched over a million being butchered. To this day, the Turkish government refuses to acknowledge the Greek, Armenian, and Assyrian Genocide but many groups in diaspora today still fight for recognition so their ancestors may have some closure in the afterlife.

 

Julian McBride is a forensic anthropologist and independent journalist born in New York. He’s the founder and director of the Reflections of War Initiative (ROW), an anthropological NGO. He reports and documents the plight of people around the world who are affected by conflicts, rogue geopolitics, and war, and also tells the stories of war victims who never get their voices heard.

Asbarez: Moscow Says Baku and Yerevan Are Ready to ‘Meet Half Way’

The Armenia-Azerbaijan border

While sounding cautious about what it called “principled disagreements” between Armenia and Azerbaijan, Moscow on Thursday said that Yerevan and Baku are ready to “meet half way” in implementing the provisions of various statements signed by their and Russia’s leaders.

“Principled disagreements remain between Baku and Yerevan over the status of Karabakh. We see our role in rapprochement of the sides,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said Thursday during a press briefing.

She explained that by providing support to Armenia and Azerbaijan in preparation for a “peace treaty,” Russia is guided by the proposals on fundamental principles of establishing inter-state relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Zakharova explained that the basic outline of the “peace treaty” was proposed by Baku and “received constructive reaction from Yerevan. We think that these are good grounds for harmonizing the positions.”

While announcing that an meeting between the deputy prime ministers of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia will take place in the near future to focus on the opening of transport links between Armenia and Azerbaijan, Zakharova said that in Moscow’s view Yerevan and Baku “are ready to meet halfway with each other, with trilateral contacts being developed on this issue.”

“It’s obvious that the real work in various formats will yield results,” said Zakharova. “Within the current approaches we are seeing progress.”

The spokesperson said that for Russia it is important the provisions of all signed agreement are fulfilled because collectively those statement will provide true results that will impact civilian and economic factors in the region.

Zakharova said that Russia considers the high-level trilateral agreements as a basis for advancing the process of settling Armenian-Azerbaijani relations and it will continue its active work with Yerevan and Baku in all directions, including in the unblocking of economic and transportation links, the launch of the demarcation process of the Armenian-Azerbaijani border and the agreement over a peace treaty.

“Issues about unblocking the transport links were discussed during a meeting between Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexei Overchuk and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev on April 26. An agreement has been reached with the Armenian and Azerbaijani sides on holding the next session of the trilateral working group chaired by the deputy prime ministers in the future. As for border issues, contacts are planned in Baku by the end of this week at a foreign ministry level,” Zakharova said.

The process of implementation of the CEPA discussed at the meeting of Armenia-EU Partnership Committee

Save

Share

 20:08,

YEREVAN, APRIL 28, ARMENPRESS. The third sitting of the Armenia-EU Partnership Committee established under the Armenia-EU Comprehensive and Enahnced Partnership Agreement (CEPA) took place on April 28 in Yerevan. It was the first meeting after the CEPA came into force on March 1. The implementation process of the Agreement was discussed during the meeting of the Partnership Committee, ARMENPRESS was informed from the Office of the EU Delegation to Armenia.

The EU emphasized its strong engagement in the region, and expressed appreciation for Armenia’s continued commitment to reform and for the very good cooperation in various sectors. The EU encouraged the country to carry on with the implementation of concrete reforms in line with the CEPA. The EU welcomed recent efforts to engage into peace talks and highlighted the humanitarian and recovery support it continues to provide.

As a key reform partner for Armenia and the largest donor, the EU stands ready to provide further expertise and financial assistance to strengthen the government’s capacity to design and deliver key governance reforms and approximate to the EU standards in line with its CEPA commitments. The ultimate aim of our partnership is to provide concrete benefits to the citizens of both the EU and Armenia.

To strengthen the country’s long-term resilience and leverage public and private investments to support the green and digital transition, the EU will continue to work closely with Armenia and partner with International Financial Institutions (IFIs) to progress with the implementation of the Economic and Investment Plan and its priority flagship projects.

Regarding the implementation of the CEPA, the discussion focused on the rule of law, including the role of an independent and efficient justice system, fight against corruption and the respect of human rights. The EU and Armenia will continue their policy dialogue and their cooperation on the implementation of the Justice sector reform, while expanding such policy discussions to the education sector to advance the finalisation and implementation of the education reform strategy. EU encouraged Armenia to make further progress towards greater freedom of the media, while appreciating the work done.

The Partnership Committee also looked at CEPA implementation in the fields of transport, energy, environment and climate action. On air transport, the EU and Armenia agreed to enhance collaboration on air safety, building on the Common Aviation Area Agreement signed in November 2021. On Energy, the EU and Armenia agreed to follow the implementation of the Armenian National Action Plan on nuclear safety, adopted as a part of the EU supported Stress test process. The discussions also took stock of economic development, employment and education reforms. The EU congratulated Armenia for joining Horizon Europe. The meeting also reviewed progress on migration and mobility and acknowledged the willingness of Armenia to start a visa liberalisation dialogue.

Finally, the Partnership Committee discussed issues related to the Eastern Partnership and regional affairs.

The meeting was co-chaired by Mr Paruyr Hovhannisyan, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Armenia and Mr Luc Devigne, Deputy Managing Director for Europe and Central Asia at the European External Action Service.

NATO is committed to peace and stability in the South Caucasus – Pashinyan receives NATO Secretary General’s Special Rep

NATO is committed to peace and stability in the South Caucasus – Pashinyan receives NATO Secretary General’s Special Rep

Save

Share

 18:33,

YEREVAN, APRIL 25, ARMENPRESS. Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan received NATO Secretary General’s Special Representative for the Caucasus and Central Asia Javier Colomina, ARMENPRESS was infomred from the Office of the Prime Minister.

Welcoming Mr. Colomina’s visit, the Prime Minister noted that Armenia attaches importance to the partnership with NATO, especially within the framework of peacekeeping missions and is interested in deepening it. Touching upon the regional situation, Nikol Pashinyan noted that it is quite tense, and Armenia is taking steps to resolve the existing problems, considering necessary the support of international partners to that process.

Javier Colomina, thanking for the reception, noted that Armenia is an important partner for the NATO and conveyed the greetings of NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg to the Prime Minister of Armenia. He stressed that the North Atlantic Alliance highly appreciates the activities of Armenian peacekeepers in the Kosovo peacekeeping mission, and his visit is an opportunity to discuss the prospects of partnership, as well as regional developments. Mr. Colomina noted that NATO is committed to peace and stability in the South Caucasus and is ready to assist in that process.

The interlocutors exchanged views on the Armenia-NATO partnership. The sides also touched upon regional and international security issues and the situation around Nagorno Karabakh.

 

The Prime Minister presented Armenia’s positions on the delimitation and demarcation of the Armenian-Azerbaijani border, the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, the unblocking of communication routes, and the Armenia-Turkey dialogue process. Nikol Pashinyan referred to the agreements reached as a result of the meetings mediated by international partners and stressed once again the importance of the international community’s targeted response to actions aimed at destabilizing the region.