BRILLIANT SUCCESS ACHIEVED BY VAHE MUSOYAN IN THE INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIAD IN INFORMATICS
Azad-Hye, United Arab Emirates
Sept 7 2005
The 17th annual International Olympiad in Informatics (IOI) took place
in Poland in August 2005 with the participation of about 270 school
children from 72 countries. According to the regulations students up
to 20 years old (who have been in school at least for the last six
months) can participate.
During its 10 years of participation Armenia for the first time
achieved gold medal. Vahe Musoyan was the star of the team and he
succeeded in gathering 511 units out of a total of 600.
Is one medal enough? Based on the regulations some 12 percent of the
participants get gold medals, which amounts to a total of 24 medals.
Each country has the right to participate with four contestants,
regardless of its size. There are countries, such as China, USA,
Russia and Republic of Korea, etc, that aspire to get gold medals for
all their four participants. In those countries favorable conditions
have been set to meet the requirements of the contestants, through
organizing training sessions, granting University admissions and the
least to say by enjoying facilities, such as training locations and
the opportunity to meet other people and to diversify their knowledge
and abilities.
Having in mind the above mentioned basic requirements we can consider
Vahe Musoyan’s gold medal as a great achievement.
Does this medal reflect the level of the Informatics as a subject
taught in Armenian schools? Armen Andreasyan, the head of the Armenian
delegation answers in one word: NO. Read More
He says to , “the medal is the result of the talent,
abilities and the efforts of Vahe Musoyan himself. He has aimed to get
this medal through had work for the last four years, getting every year
better in solving algorithmic problems. He has already participated
in the Olympiads for the last three times acquiring two bronze medals”
(see last year’s correspondence in our website).
Mr. Armen Andreasyan has been training the Armenian team in the
special school call Kvant for the last 3 and half years. He says that
unfortunately the subject of Informatics is neglected in Armenian
schools. The number of teachers is not enough and the knowledge base
of the existing ones is not sufficient. Informatics is not one of the
subjects required to enter University. Therefore it has been pushed
away from the main stream subjects.
On the question, why the other participants did not get medals, Mr.
Andreasyan admits that results of the other members of the team were
below the expectations and they should be considered to be low. Vahe
Gulyan for example gathered 240 units, which were not enough to get
a bronze medal. Armen Mnatsakanyan scored 228 units. The reason seems
to be the level of the preparation. In many countries special summer
sessions take place to develop the abilities of the students. There are
Olympiad centers, summer and winter courses, internet training sites,
but in Armenia these conditions are available only in few places.
There is another problem. The participants of the International
Olympiad of Informatics in Armenia have two choices: either to
prepare themselves to University entry level general examinations or
to devote their time to IOI trainings. It is becoming hard to achieve
good results in both. Therefore those who are opting for the first
one are not finding enough time to train for the Olympiad and are
consequently scoring humble results.
We congratulate the Armenian team and their training teacher and hope
that this year’s achievement will inspire them all to have better
results next year.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Author: Garnik Tadevosian
Don’t allow a new arms race in the Southern Caucasus
DON’T ALLOW A NEW ARMS RACE IN THE SOUTHERN CAUCASUS
By Sabine Freizer
Daily Star – Lebanon
Aug 31 2005
On August 27, the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan met on the
sidelines of the Commonwealth of Independent States summit in Kazan,
Russia, to discuss the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.
That brutal war, which killed some 20,000 people and displaced over a
million, has been locked in a shaky cease-fire for a decade, hindering
development throughout the southern Caucasus.
Kazan did not produce miracles – or even headlines. However, it
provided an opportunity for Presidents Robert Kocharian of Armenia
and Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan, in their second face-to-face meeting
in four months, to encourage their foreign ministers to continue
talks and consider proposals prepared by the Minsk Group of the
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. It was not the
hoped-for ice-breaker, but it was an important step forward in the
resolution of that long-frozen conflict.
Over half a million Azerbaijanis were forcibly displaced by the war and
continue to live in precarious conditions in decrepit camps, unsure of
their future. Nagorno-Karabakh forces backed by Armenia continue to
control seven Azerbaijani districts in addition to Nagorno-Karabakh
itself. Such dramatic and painful consequences have prevented the
two sides from making a deal, with the rhetoric in Baku and Yerevan
effectively on war-footing for 10 years. Since major hostilities
in and around Nagorno-Karabakh halted in 1994, the parties to the
conflict have been unable to sign a single agreement bringing them
closer to a political settlement.
However, for over a year now, the foreign ministers of Armenia and
Azerbaijan have been engaged in a new round of talks, supplemented
by meetings between their presidents. The United States, France and
Russia – the co-chairs of the Minsk Group, responsible for facilitating
negotiations – are expressing rare optimism that a settlement may be
within reach.
An actual peace-building process could begin with the withdrawal from
occupied territories and would most likely end with a legal process
(or a vote), including the participation of Karabakh Armenians and
Karabakh Azeris, to determine the future status of Nagorno-Karabakh.
Somewhere in between, displaced Azeris would start returning home.
Kocharian and Aliyev not only have to agree on these fundamental
points, they need to do so very publicly to begin preparing their
people for a settlement.
Last time, when Armenia and Azerbaijan were close to a deal after
negotiations in Key West, Florida, in 2001, the presidents did not
work on getting public backing for their efforts, and public reaction
to a political compromise was hostile. Former Minsk Group co-chair,
Ambassador Carey Cavanaugh from the United States, summed up Key
West’s failure, saying: “The presidents were ahead of their people.”
The Azerbaijani and Armenian people have been receiving contradictory
messages from their authorities for years. On the one hand, they are
told the conflict should be resolved peacefully; on the other, they
hear there is no room for compromise. While there may have been little
ethnic basis for the war when it started, today official propaganda
has helped insure the build-up of mutual hatred and contempt. The
near complete breakdown in communication and friendship ties between
Armenians and Azerbaijanis, between Karabakh Armenians and Karabakh
Azeris, means that neither population has much understanding of the
other’s grievances and fears.
Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders have long relied on tough talk
at home to boost their domestic approval ratings. Today, as the
opposition in both countries is threatening to take power – after the
November 6 parliamentary elections in Azerbaijan and a crucial vote on
constitutional amendments in Armenia later that month – leaders may
feel it is easier to stick with the proven methods of chauvinism for
keeping their hold on power. Some evidence of this came last month,
when Aliyev announced a 70-percent increase in military spending,
which has, overall, gone up from $135 million in 2003 to $300 million
in 2005, and Armenian officials replied that their army had resources
to match that sum.
An arms race in the Southern Caucasus and a reversion to nationalist
rhetoric will not help. The presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia have
a chance to lead their populations on a road toward a settlement,
and they should act boldly and take it. They should begin by promoting
contacts between their people, as well as between Karabakh Armenians
and Azeris. After Kazan, they can begin a new journey, showing their
people and the world that they are leaders who will not miss this
historical chance to bring peace, prosperity and development to their
divided region.
Sabine Freizer is Caucasus Project Director for the International
Crisis Group (). This commentary was written for
THE DAILY STAR.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Constitutional amendments in the special session
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS IN THE SPECIAL SESSION
A1+
| 13:27:23 | 29-08-2005 | Politics |
110 deputies were present at the NA special session at 10 a.m. this
morning. 96 of them voted for the agenda. The opposition except the
deputies of the Republican party and Vazgen Manoukyan who is not in
Armenia participated in the session.
At the very beginning of the session before the confirming of the
agenda secretary of the Justice bloc Viktor Dallakyan announced that
the 11th article of the present Constitution and the 74th article
of the NA regulating law have been violated. According to the NA can
discuss either the new Constitution or Constitutional amendments.
The RA President’s order about convening a NA special session says,
“RA Constitution (with amendments)”, this excited Viktor Dallakyan’s
apprehension, as this kind of a formulation can give Robert Kocharyan
the possibility to be elected a third time. Besides, the draft
constitution which was distributed to the deputies was not signed
by anyone.
The NA President Arthur Baghdasaryan mentioned in answer that
everything was clear. Viktor Dallakyan said, “It is clear for you,
but the formulation gives reason for different interpretations. Our
work must be clear enough so as not to leave room for different
interpretations”. The Justice bloc asked for a break for 20
minutes. Meanwhile, according to Dallakyan, Arthur Baghdasaryan made
a call to the President’s residence to clear up his future tasks.
After the break Arthur Baghdasaryan announced that the Draft
Constitution is subject to discussions. The main speaker is the deputy
President of the Orinats Yerkir party Mher Shahgeldyan. The discussion
is broadcast by the Armenian national TV Company.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Rice Hopeful About Crucial Armenian-Azeri Talks
Caucaz.com, Georgia
Aug 26 2005
Rice Hopeful About Crucial Armenian-Azeri Talks
Baku, August 26 – The United States underscored its hopes for a
breakthrough in the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process Thursday when
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice telephoned Azerbaijan’s President
Ilham Aliev to discuss his upcoming crucial meeting with his Armenian
counterpart.
In a statement cited by the Itar-Tass news agency, Aliev’s office
quoted Rice as telling the Azerbaijani leader that she `attaches
great importance’ to the talks that are due to take place in the
Russian city of Kazan on Saturday. She was reported to express hope
that they will facilitate a peaceful resolution of the Karabakh
conflict, a key U.S. goal in the region. Aliev, according to his
press service, said he has similar hopes.
U.S., Russian and French diplomats spearheading the negotiating
process signaled last month that Aliev and President Robert Kocharian
could clear the final hurdle to peace in Kazan. U.S. Undersecretary
of State for Global Affairs Paula Dobriansky similarly noted on July
27 their meeting `can potentially be a turning point.’
Preparations for that meeting were discussed by the Armenian and
Azerbaijani foreign ministers in Moscow on Tuesday and Wednesday.
Vartan Oskanian and Elmar Mammadyarov sounded cautiously upbeat after
their talks held in the presence of the mediating troika.
Speaking to RFE/RL, Mammadyarov did not deny that the parties have
been discussing a peace deal that would enable the residents of
Karabakh to decide its status at a referendum.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Azerbaijan comes out for peaceful Karabakh settlement
Azerbaijan comes out for peaceful Karabakh settlement
By Sevindzh Abdullayeva, Viktor Shulman
ITAR-TASS News Agency
August 12, 2005 Friday
BAKU, August 12 — Azerbaijan comes out for the peaceful settlement
of the Karabakh conflict and intends to use the whole potential of
negotiations, Azerbaijani President Ilkham Aliyev said at a meeting
with residents of Sumgait in the north of the Apsheron peninsula
on Friday.
“However, if they (talks) do not yield results, a new situation
will emerge and necessary decisions will be taken,” the Azerbaijani
president pointed out.
Azerbaijan has lost 20 percent of its territory as a result of the
Karabakh conflict, more than one million Azerbaijanis became refugees
and forced migrants.
According to the co-chairmen of the OSCE Minsk Group on Nagorno
Karabakh (Russia, France and the United States) “some positive changes
are observed” in the conflict settlement process. Some hopes are
anchored on the upcoming Moscow meeting of the foreign ministers of
Azerbaijan and Armenia on August 23, and the talks of the presidents
of the countries that will be held at the CIS summit in Kazan three
days later.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Turkey blocks planned visit of Swiss politician
Turkey blocks planned visit of Swiss politician
The Associated Press
08/05/05 09:32 EDT
BERN, Switzerland (AP) – Turkey has blocked a planned visit of
Switzerland’s economics minister, a Swiss official said Friday,
the latest episode in a long-running diplomatic dispute between the
two governments.
The visit was formally canceled because of “schedule clashes,” said
Christophe Hans, spokesman for Economics Minister Joseph Deiss.
Hans declined to say whether the decision was affected by an argument
over Turkey’s killings of Armenians around the time of World War I,
considered by the Swiss and some other governments to have amounted
to genocide. Ankara fiercely denies that Turks committed genocide.
“We regret the decision and we hope that Mr. Deiss will have the
opportunity to go on an official visit in the future,” Hans said.
Ankara was angered last month when Swiss authorities launched an
investigation into a visiting Turkish politician, Dogu Perincek,
who said the killings weren’t genocide.
Under Switzerland’s anti-racism laws, denying genocide is a crime,
and Perincek was briefly detained after his speech.
Last month, Turkey called the Swiss ambassador to the Foreign
Ministry to protest Perincek’s detention and investigation. Speaking
to another Swiss newspaper at the weekend, Perincek reiterated his
earlier comments.
“There has never been a genocide. That is an international historic
lie,” he told SonntagsBlick.
Similar disputes have erupted in the past between Turkey and
Switzerland.
In June, a Turkish Cabinet minister postponed a visit to Switzerland
to protest an investigation of a Turkish historian who denied the
killings were genocide.
The Swiss foreign minister had been scheduled to travel to Turkey in
2003, but Turkey withdrew its invitation after the parliament of a
western Swiss canton (state) approved a motion calling the killings
a genocide.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Genocidio armeno: Perincek giustizia vodese vuole unico procedimento
Schweizerische Depeschenagentur AG (SDA)
SDA – Servizio di base in Italiano
Giovedì 28 luglio 2005
Genocidio armeno: Perincek, giustizia vodese vuole unico procedimento
BERNA
Il capo del Partito dei lavoratori turchi, Dogu Perincek, sospettato
di aver negato il genocidio armeno durante alcuni suoi soggiorni in
Svizzera, dovrebbe essere giudicato da un foro unico. E’ quanto ha
affermato oggi all’ats il giudice istruttore vodese Jacques Antenen,
il quale ha preso contatto con le autorita’ zurighesi che stanno
indagando contro la stessa persona per lo stesso reato. Intanto, nel
pomeriggio l’ambasciatore turco dovrebbe essere ricevuto a Berna per
discutere del caso.
I fatti rimproverati al politico turco risalgono allo scorso fine
settimana, quando Perincek si e’ recato sulle rive del Lemano per
festeggiare l’anniversario del Trattato di Losanna del 1923 che
sanci’ la nascita della Turchia moderna. In quell’occasione, il
politico ha ripetuto il suo credo, ossia che il genocidio in realta’
e’ una “menzogna degli imperialisti”. Con lo slogan “genocidio degli
armeni”, i parlamenti europei adottano risoluzioni che mirano
all’abolizione dello Stato nazionale turco, ha esclamato.
Un’affermazione che violerebbe la norma antirazzismo e che
costituirebbee un reato per la legislazione elvetica.
Sabato l’uomo era gia’ stato interrogato per due ore dal giudice
istruttore di Winterthur a causa di una conferenza tenuta il giorno
prima a Glattbrugg (ZH) dove ha pronunciato un discorso simile a
quello di Losanna.
La vicenda ha scatenato la reazione stizzita del ministro degli
esteri turco Abdullah Guel che ha definito l’interrogatorio
“inaccettabile” e assolutamente “contrario al principio della
liberta’ di espressione”.
Su Perincek pende gia’ una denuncia sporta dall’Associazione
Svizzera-Armenia (ASA), per negazionismo, dopo un discorso
pronunciato il 7 maggio a Losanna. Il giudice istruttore losannese
che pensava di approfittare della presenza di Perincek il fine
settimana scorso per sentirlo si e’ visto opporre un rifiuto dal
diretto interessato, il quale si e’ giustificato dicendo di non avere
tempo. Le autorita’ vodesi – aveva assicurato la portavoce della
polizia losannese, Ghislaine Carron – contano pero di poterlo
interrogare ugualmente.
Per Antenen, la polizia deve ancora confermare se il politico ha
ripetuto affermazioni condannabili in pubblico domenica scorsa a
Losanna. In caso affermativo, l’inchiesta sara’ estesa anche a questo
episodio.
La giustizia elvetica indaga anche sullo storico Yusuf Halacoglu per
fatti risalenti al giugno 2004. Sempre la procura di Winterthur aveva
aperto infatti un procedimento contro di lui per le affermazioni
contenute in una conferenza del maggio 2004, durante la quale avrebbe
minimizzato gli avvenimenti del 1915, violando in tal modo la norma
federale anti-razzismo.
Ieri il governo di Ankara ha affermato di volere la sospensione
immediata delle indagini preliminari nei confronti dei due suoi
cittadini. Simili propositi sono stati comunicati dal Ministero degli
esteri turco all’ambasciatore svizzero ad Ankara Walter Gyger. Oggi
il caso sara’ discusso tra l’ambascitore turco a Berna e Jean-Jacques
de Dardel, capo della divisione politica I del Dipartimento federale
degli affari esteri.
La questione del genocidio armeno – si stima abbia causato un numero
di morti compreso tra i 200mila e i 2 milioni – e’ ormai da anni un
ostacolo nelle relazioni fra Berna e Ankara. Stando allo storico
Hans-Lukas Kieser, che da anni si occupa di questa vicenda, la
Turchia ha sempre reagito con rabbia alle critiche provenienti dalla
Svizzera. Sulle colonne della “Berner Zeitung”, Kieser ha dichiarato
che per Ankara la Confederazione e’ un modello, giacche ha svolto un
ruolo importante nella nascita della Turchia moderna. Per i turchi la
questione armena e’ ancora tabu’.
In Svizzera il genocidio armeno e’ stato riconosciuto dal Consiglio
nazionale, ma non dal Consiglio degli Stati ne dal Consiglio
federale. A livello cantonale, il genocidio e’ stato riconosciuto dai
Gran Consigli di Vaud e Ginevra, nonche dall’esecutivo di
quest’ultimo cantone.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Canadian Armenians arrive with charity mission
ArmenPress
July 26 2005
CANADIAN ARMENIANS ARRIVE WITH CHARITY MISSION
ARTIMET, JULY 26, ARMENPRESS: Twenty-four young people (16-20
years old) from the Canadian Armenian Youth Mission headed by the
leader of the Canadian Diocese of the Armenian Church Archbishop
Bagrat Galstian arrived in Armenia with a charity mission and
launched the reconstruction of St Astvatsatsin (Virgin) church built
in 1876 in Artimet village, Armavir province. The volunteers of the
program organized a camp for 60 children from socially unsecured
families of the village Aratashen and after their work they join the
kids.
Archbishop said the funds spent on the implementation of the
charity program are provided by the Canadian Armenian community. The
volunteers arrived in Armenia for a month and are hosted by the local
farmers.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Author aims to uncover genocide’s screen link
Contra Costa Times, CA
July 11 2005
Author aims to uncover genocide’s screen link
CONTRA COSTA TIMES
MORAGA – As a child in the 1930s, Ed Minasian often found refuge in
the movie theater across the street from the three-story tenement
where he grew up in Massachusetts.
“From our window I could see the Grace Episcopal Church, and next to
it was the Capitol Theater. On some Sundays, I chose the latter over
the former,” Minasian said. At 10 cents a show, it was the best
entertainment value of the day, and the darkened theater offered an
escape from everyday woes.
There was plenty to escape from: The Depression was in full swing on
one side of the ocean, Adolf Hitler was coming to power on the other,
and in the Armenian community he grew up in, the memory of the
atrocities committed against his people during the genocide that
began in 1915 was still fresh.
Armenians say that Turkish forces, trying to purge the country of
Armenians, caused the deaths of 1.5 million people in outright
killings or in forced deportations that led to starvation during
World War I. The Turkish government denies the genocide occurred.
For someone of Armenian descent, it rarely takes long for the
conversation to circle around to the genocide 90 years ago. For
Minasian, it takes no time at all for the conversation to circle
around to movies.
The 80-year-old Moraga resident, who lost siblings during the mass
killings, has spent 24 years researching the place where those two
circles intersect: 1930s Hollywood. His findings, which he hopes to
publish in a book, detail how the Turkish government managed to
squelch repeated attempts by MGM studios to make a movie about the
genocide.
The Armenian community — scattered throughout the world after the
genocide — had hoped the film would finally bring international
attention to their plight, and he felt the loss keenly.
“All of us knew, yes, Turkey had something to do with stopping that
movie from being made, but we never knew who, what, when, where,
why?” Minasian said. “Well, I found out.”
He was 10 when the book that piqued MGM’s interest — Franz Werfel’s
“The Forty Days of Musa Dagh” — came out in 1934. It quickly topped
the bestseller charts, but it was another 10 years before he finally
sat down to read it.
By then Minasian was in the Air Force, “stationed in a godforsaken
place in west Texas called Rattlesnake Army Air Base,” where they
trucked in girls from nearby towns on the weekends to dance with the
GIs.
“None of us ever got to finish a dance, because we were always cut
in, but I had plenty of time to read in my off hours,” he said. He
found the book at the base library. “I read that book more often than
any other book. I used to read it every April … because April is
the anniversary of the genocide.”
Werfel’s novel is a fictionalized account of the following events:.
Having heard about the soaring death tolls on the forced “death
marches” to the Syrian desert, the villagers of Musa Dagh decided to
resist Turkish forces. Nearly two months later, the survivors were
rescued by the French, who spotted their distress banners from nearby
ships.
The villagers were relocated to the Middle East, where they formed a
community in the Anjar area of present-day Lebanon, said Barlow Der
Mugrdechian, a professor of Armenian Studies at Fresno State
University who knows of Minasian’s project. The incident is “a
well-known story to the Armenians.”
But the book, written by an Austrian Jew as Hitler was gaining
influence, had an even broader appeal. It was embraced with
particular enthusiasm by Jews who saw it as an inspirational tale,
and Germany quickly banned the book.
“I say, look, if the world had responded to the Armenian genocide,
there might not have been a Holocaust,” Minasian said.
When MGM bought the rights, intending to bring the story to the
screen with the help of Hollywood greats like producer Irving
Thalberg and Armenian director Rouben Mamoulian, Armenians everywhere
were ecstatic, he recalled. “That wonderful book is going to be made
into a movie, and that movie will play all over the world, and
finally our story of the genocide will get out.”
The celebration was short-lived.
MGM soon dropped that project, and several subsequent attempts over
the next few decades. It was widely rumored that the deal collapsed
under pressure from the Turkish government, and in 1981, Minasian
decided to find out exactly what had happened.
Over the next decades, Minasian sifted through archives from Armenian
newspapers, Hollywood institutions and the U.S. State Department to
piece together a picture of the doomed flick’s fate.
Between raising a family and pursuing a teaching career, he has
written articles on the topic published by the National Association
for Armenian Studies, and a 300-page manuscript he hopes to publish
soon.
“He’s done a rather thorough study of this whole issue,” said UCLA
professor Richard Hovannisian, a leading scholar of Armenian studies.
Turkey’s role in the movie’s demise isn’t a matter of speculation,
it’s well-documented in diplomatic correspondences in the U.S. State
Department archives, he said. “(The movie) would have attracted
worldwide attention on the screen, so the quashing of the work was a
blow to historical memory.”
In his quest to document who dealt that blow, Minasian was granted
rare access to MGM’s archives by the studio’s story editor, Samuel
Marx, and he spent more than a week sifting through four grocery
carts filled with files on the Musa Dagh movie. He dictated the
interesting bits into his tape recorder. It took nearly three years
after that to transcribe the recordings into notes.
Over the years, he also read through Werfel’s papers housed at UCLA
and the scripts kept by the American Film Institute.
To cap it off, he used the Freedom of Information Act to get the
State Department’s file on MGM and the Musa Dagh movie.
Minasian knows he faces a few publishing hurdles. To begin with, he’s
an unknown author with no agent, and also, he’s been told his subject
is “esoteric” and “passé.” He figures he may end up self-publishing
the book.
His passion for film is one of the forces driving the project,
evident in the old movie posters lining his walls. Conversations
about almost anything can lead back to movies, from the book Minasian
just finished reading (“The Da Vinci Code,” whose movie version will
star Tom Hanks) to Armenia’s early embrace of Christianity (which
elicits a reference to the recent Crusades flick “Kingdom of
Heaven”).
When “Sideways” came out last year, Minasian was the first to spread
the word throughout the local Armenian community: Some of the final
scenes feature an Armenian-American wedding, filmed at a real
Southern California Armenian church.
For Minasian, the genocide isn’t just history, it’s family history.
His parents both survived the massacre but lost their first spouses
and some of their children. His mother was 19 when she watched the
men in her village, including her first husband, marched away by
Turkish soldiers, carrying the shovels to dig their own graves. His
mother and sister joined the long line of Armenians forced to march
toward the Syrian desert, with only as much food and water as they
could carry.
His father was already living in the United States, hoping to send
for his first wife and three children back in Turkey, when the
massacre began. Only one daughter from that marriage survived, and
when Minasian met her in 1976, she told him about a brother he had
never heard of, who died of typhus at age 3 on one of the forced
marches. Minasian, who still wonders why his father never mentioned
the little boy, now carries a copy of the child’s picture in his
wallet.
His work is a tribute to them.
“I see it as my legacy for my folks, who were survivors, and so many
of the people I came to know in my youth and even now,” he said. “You
see, we’re not fighting for vengeance, we’re fighting for justice. We
want the Turkish government to own up to what they did.”
BIOGRAPHY
NAME: Ed Minasian
AGE: 80
EDUCATION: Master’s from UC Berkeley
OCCUPATION: Retired teacher from Laney College in Oakland
RESIDENCE: Moraga
CLAIM TO FAME: Spent years researching MGM’s attempts to make a movie
about the Armenian genocide
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Armenian ombudsman accuses authorities of pressure
Armenian ombudsman accuses authorities of pressure
Arminfo
5 Jul 05
YEREVAN
“The pressure the Armenian law-enforcement agencies are exerting on me
is the authorities’ painful reaction to the annual report about my
work,” Armenian ombudsman Larisa Alaverdyan told our correspondent
while commenting on events related to the Armenian ombudsman’s
institute.
She said that the authorities of any state should stimulate the
ombudsman’s work which is aimed at protecting citizens’ rights. The
situation is quite paradoxical in Armenia. Instead of helping me, the
authorities started putting pressure on the institute after the
ombudsman’s report was published.
“I expected a sharp reaction, but I did not expect that it would be so
painful, especially as people named after classics of Russian
literature (meaning human rights champion Pushkin Serobyan who accused
Alaverdyan of inaction) are involved in the process.
Alaverdyan believes that her institute “is working the way it worked
before and practically nothing has changed”. As for the issue of
whether her employee Serob Antinyan had taken a bribe or not, this
should be decided by the court, the ombudsman stressed.
It must be remembered that on 26 May the Armenian National Security
Service [NSS] arrested an employee of the Armenian ombudsman’s office,
Serob Antinyan, on charges of extortion and bribery. Alaverdyan also
expressed her confidence at today’s news conference that the country’s
parliament will re-elect her to the post of ombudsman after the
approval of a package of constitutional amendments in a nationwide
referendum. “And then I will be able to work normally,” the ombudsman
thinks.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress