State Of Denial: Turkey Spends Millions To Cover Up Armenian Genocid

STATE OF DENIAL: TURKEY SPENDS MILLIONS TO COVER UP ARMENIAN GENOCIDE
By David Holthouse

Intelligence Report
article.jsp?aid=935
June 3 2008
AL

Early this year, the Toronto District School Board voted to require all
public high school students in Canada’s largest city to complete a new
course titled "Genocide: Historical and Contemporary Implications." It
includes a unit on the Armenian genocide, in which more than a
million Armenians perished in a methodical and premeditated scheme
of annihilation orchestrated by the rulers of Turkey during and just
after World War I.

The school board members each soon received a letter from Guenter
Lewy, a professor emeritus of political science at the University of
Massachusetts, rebuking them for classifying the Armenian genocide in
the same category as the Holocaust. "The tragic fate of the Armenian
community during World War I," Lewy wrote, is best understood as "a
badly mismanaged war-time security measure," rather than a carefully
plotted genocide.

Lewy is one of the most active members of a network of American
scholars, influence peddlers and website operators, financed by
hundreds of thousands of dollars each year from the government of
Turkey, who promote the denial of the Armenian genocide — a network
so influential that it was able last fall to defy both historical
truth and enormous political pressure to convince America’s lawmakers
and even its president to reverse long-held policy positions.

Lewy makes similar revisionist claims in his 2005 book The Armenian
Massacres in Ottoman Turkey: A Disputed Genocide and in frequent
lectures at university campuses across the country. Speaking at Harvard
University in March 2007, he chalked up the ghastly Armenian death toll
to "bungling misrule," and stressed that "it is important to bear in
mind the enormous difference between ineptness, even ineptness that
had tragic consequences" and deliberate mass murder.

"Armenians call the calamitous events of 1915-1916 in the Ottoman
Empire the first genocide of the twentieth century," he said. "Most
Turks refer to this episode as war time relocation made necessary by
the treasonous conduct of the Armenian minority. The debate on what
actually happened has been going on for almost 100 years and shows
no signs of resolution."

But it’s not only Armenians calling the slaughter a genocide, and
there is no real debate about its essential details, according to
the vast majority of credible historians. Although Lewy’s brand of
genocide denial is subtler than that of Holocaust deniers who declare
there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz, it’s no less an attempt to
rewrite history.

"The overwhelming opinion of scholars who study genocide — hundreds
of independent scholars, who have no affiliations with governments,
and whose work spans many countries and nationalities and the course
of decades — is consistent," the International Association of Genocide
Scholars stated in a 2005 letter to the Turkish government.

"The scholarly evidence reveals the following: On April 24, 1915,
under cover of World War I, the Young Turk government of the Ottoman
Empire began a systematic genocide of its Armenian citizens — an
unarmed Christian minority population. More than a million Armenians
were exterminated through direct killing, starvation, torture, and
forced death marches. The rest of the Armenian population fled into
permanent exile. Thus an ancient civilization was expunged from its
homeland of 2,500 years."

Double Killing Despite this clear consensus of experts, Turkey exerts
political leverage and spends millions of dollars in the United States
to obfuscate the Armenian genocide, with alarming success even at
the highest levels of government. Lobbyists on the Turkish payroll
stymied a Congressional resolution commemorating the genocide last
fall by convincing lawmakers to reverse their stated positions. Even
President Bush flip-flopped.

Revisionist historians who conjure doubt about the Armenian genocide
and are paid by the Turkish government provided the politicians
with the intellectual cover they needed to claim they were refusing
to dictate history rather than caving in to a foreign government’s
present-day interests.

"This all happened a long time ago, and I don’t know if we can know
whether it was a massacre or a genocide or what," said U.S. Rep. John
Murtha (D-Penn.) after changing his vote.

"The last thing Congress should be doing is deciding the history of
an empire [the Ottoman empire] that doesn’t even exist any more,"
said President Bush.

But experts in genocide saw things quite differently.

"Denial is the final stage of genocide," says Gregory Stanton,
president of the International Association of Genocide Scholars. "It
is a continuing attempt to destroy the victim group psychologically
and culturally, to deny its members even the memory of the murders of
their relatives. That is what the Turkish government today is doing
to Armenians around the world."

Last year, the Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity issued a letter
condemning Armenian genocide denial that was signed by 53 Nobel
laureates including Wiesel, the famous Holocaust survivor and political
activist. Wiesel has repeatedly called Turkey’s 90-year-old campaign
to cover up the Armenian genocide a double killing, since it strives
to kill the memory of the original atrocities.

He was hardly the first. As long ago as 1943, law professor Raphael
Lemkin, who would later serve as an advisor to Nuremburg chief counsel
Robert Jackson, coined the term "genocide" with the Armenians in mind.

Stanton, a former U.S. State Department official who drafted the United
Nations Security Council resolutions that created the International
Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, spoke this April at a United States
Capitol ceremony honoring victims of the Armenian genocide — a
ceremony held four months after the bill to commemorate the slaughter
was shot down.

"The U.S. government should not be party to efforts to kill the
memory of a historical fact as profound and important as the genocide
of the Armenians, which Hitler used as an example in his plan for
the Holocaust," Stanton said before an audience that included three
survivors of the Armenian genocide and more than 100 representatives
and senators.

Infiltrating the Academy Efforts to kill the memory of the Armenian
genocide began while carrion birds were still picking over corpses in
their desert boneyards, with Turkey issuing a first official statement
assuring the world at large that no atrocities had occurred. Turkey’s
primary strategy for denying the Armenian genocide since then has
shifted from blanket denial to disputing the death toll to blaming
the massacres on Kurdish bandits and a few rogue officials to claiming
the Armenians who died were enemy combatants in a civil war.

Turkey began intervening in the U.S. on behalf of denying the
genocide in the 1930s, when Turkish leaders convinced the U.S. State
Department to prevent MGM studios from making a movie based on the
book The Forty Days of the Musa Dagh because it depicted aspects of
the Armenian genocide.

In 1982, the government of Turkey donated $3 million to create the
Institute for Turkish Studies, a nonprofit organization housed at
Georgetown University that pushes a pro-Turkey agenda, including
denial of the Armenian genocide. Three years later, in 1985, Turkey
bought full-page advertisements in The New York Times, The Washington
Post and The Washington Times to publish a letter questioning the
Armenian genocide that was signed by 69 American scholars. All 69 had
received funding that year from the Institute for Turkish Studies or
another of Turkey’s surrogates like the Ankara Chamber of Commerce,
a quasi-governmental agency in Turkey’s capital city.

The Institute for Turkish Studies has since received sizable donations
from American defense contractors that sell arms to Turkey, including
General Dynamics and Westinghouse. Turkey continues to provide an
annual subsidy to support the institute. In 2006, the most recent year
for which tax records are available, the institute awarded $85,000
in grants to scholars. Its chairman is the current Turkish ambassador
to the U.S., Nabi Sensoy.

The first unassailable evidence of the extent of the Armenian genocide
denial industry’s reach in academic circles arrived in 1990 in an
envelope addressed to Robert Jay Lifton, a professor of psychology and
psychiatry at the City University of New York’s Graduate Center and
John Jay College. It contained a letter signed by Nuzhet Kandemir,
who was then Turkey’s ambassador to the United States, protesting
Lifton’s inclusion of several passing references to the Armenian
genocide in his prize-winning book The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing
and the Psychology of Genocide.

"It is particularly disturbing to see a major scholar on the
holocaust, a tragedy whose enormity and barbarity must never be
forgotten, so careless in his references to a field outside his own
area of expertise," Kandemir wrote. "To compare a tragic civil war
perpetrated by misguided Armenian nationalists, and the human suffering
it wrought on both Muslim and Christian populations, with the horrors
of a premeditated attempt to systematically eradicate a people is,
to anyone familiar with the history in question, simply ludicrous."

There was nothing out of the ordinary about Kandemir’s
letter. Academics who write about the Armenian genocide were then
and still are routinely castigated by Turkish authorities.

What Lifton found intriguing, however, was a second letter in
the envelope, which the Turkish ambassador had included quite by
accident. It was a memo to Kandemir from Near East historian Heath
Lowry, in which Lowry provided Kandemir with a point-by-point cheat
sheet on how to attack Lifton’s book, which Lowry chummily referred
to as "our problem."

Lowry at the time was the founding director of the Institute for
Turkish Studies. He resigned that position in 1996 when he was selected
from a field of 20 candidates to fill the Ataturk Chair of Turkish
Studies at Princeton University, a new position in the Near Eastern
Studies department that was created with a $750,000 matching grant
from the government of Turkey.

Prior to joining the Princeton faculty, Lowry had never held a
full-time teaching position and had not published a single work of
scholarship through a major publishing house. As a result of that and
of what The Boston Globe described in 1995 as his work as "a long-time
lobbyist for the Turkish government," his appointment sparked a
firestorm of controversy. A protest group called Princeton Alumni for
Credibility published a petition decrying Lowry’s appointment that
was signed by more than 80 leading scholars and writers, including
Kurt Vonnegut, Arthur Miller, Cornel West, Joyce Carol Oates and many
historians and experts in genocide.

Peter Balakian, the director of Colgate University’s Center for the
Study of Ethics and World Societies and the author of The Burning
Tigris: The Armenian Genocide and America’s Response, called Lowry
"a propagandist for a foreign government."

Speaking at a 2005 symposium at Princeton commemorating the 90th
anniversary of the Armenian genocide, Balakian posed a rhetorical
question: "Would a university want someone who worked with a neo-Nazi
group to cover up the Holocaust on their faculty?"

The relationship of Turkey to U.S. scholars promoting Armenian
genocide denial is similar to that of the oil industry to fringe
climatologists who dispute the reality of global warming. The cause
and effect relationship is murky. It’s impossible to know for sure
if they’re making the claims to get the money or getting the money
because they make the claims. And many of those who receive money from
the Institute of Turkish Studies do little or nothing to support the
government’s version of what happened to its Armenian minority.

But a number of them certainly seem to, including Justin A. McCarthy,
a professor of history at the University of Louisville. McCarthy claims
that death tolls attributed to what he calls "this imaginary Turkish
plan" are grossly exaggerated and resulted from justifiable wartime
self-defense actions triggered by traitorous Armenians conspiring
with Turkey’s enemies.

McCarthy also points out that Armenians massacred Turks on at least
one occasion before the "so-called Armenian genocide." In other words,
they had it coming. "The question of who started the conflicts is
important, both historically and morally important," McCarthy declared
in a 2005 speech before the Turkish Grand National Assembly. "In more
than 100 years of warfare, Turks and Armenians killed each other. The
question of who began the killing must be understood, because it is
seldom justifiable to be the aggressor, but is always justifiable to
defend yourself."

He continued: "If those who defend themselves go beyond defense and
exact revenge, as always happens in war, they should be identified
and criticized. But those who should be most blamed are those who
began the wars, those who committed the first evil deeds, and those
who caused the bloodshed. Those who began the conflict were the
Armenian nationalists, the Armenian revolutionaries. The guilt is on
their heads."

Enforcing the Turkish View

In France and Switzerland, it’s a crime to deny the Armenian
genocide. In Turkey, it’s a crime to affirm it.

Enacted in 2005, Article 301 of the Turkish penal code makes it illegal
for any citizen or resident of Turkey to give credence to the Armenian
genocide. Numerous journalists and scholars have been prosecuted for
"denigrating Turkishness" under that statute, beginning with Nobel
laureate Orhan Pamuk, who was charged for stating, "A million Armenians
were killed in these lands." Turkish-Armenian newspaper editor
Hrant Dink was prosecuted three times for criticizing the Turkish
government’s longstanding policy of denying the Armenian genocide.

Where the law failed to silence Dink, bullets succeeded. He was gunned
down in front of his central Istanbul office last January by a Turkish
ultranationalist. Footage and photos later surfaced of the assassin
celebrating in front of a Turkish flag with grinning policemen.

Dink’s friend and ideological ally Tanner Ackam, a distinguished
Turkish historian and sociologist on the faculty of the University
of Minnesota’s Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies, attended
Dink’s funeral in Turkey, despite the considerable risk to his
own life. Ackam, a leading international authority on the Armenian
genocide, was marked for death by Turkish ultranationalists following
the November 2006 publication of his book, A Shameful Act: The Armenian
Genocide and The Question of Turkish Responsibility. The book is a
definitive history based in large part on official documents from
Turkish government archives.

"It would be better for world peace and truth if sewer germs like you
were taken off the planet," went one of the dozens of anonymous threats
Ackam continues to receive in Minnesota. "Pray that the devil takes you
away soon because otherwise you’ll be living a hell on earth. … Who
am I? You’re going to find out, Tanner, you’re going to find out."

Turkish ultranationalists have, in effect, targeted many other people
who, like Ackam, affirm the genocide. Several of their websites
include home addresses, phone numbers and photos of these scholars.

Genocide deniers often disrupt Ackam’s lectures. In November 2006,
a gang of Turkish ultranationalists attacked him at a book signing
at City University of New York.

"Denial of the Armenian genocide has developed over the decades to
become a complex and far-reaching machine that rivals the Nazi Germany
propaganda ministry," says Ackam. "This machine runs on academic
dishonesty, fabricated information, political pressure, intimidation
and threats, all funded or supported, directly or indirectly, by the
Turkish state. It has become a huge industry."

Convincing Congress Academia is one of two major American fronts in
Turkey’s campaign to kill the memory of the Armenian genocide. The
other is Congress.

As the only Muslim-dominated country in a troubled region to call
the U.S. and Israel its allies, Turkey wields significant political
influence that it uses to prevent the U.S. from joining 22 other
nations in officially recognizing the Armenian genocide as a historical
fact.

In 1989, the U.S. State Department released archived eyewitness
accounts that, according to State Department officials, showed
that "thousands and thousands of Armenians, mostly innocent and
helpless women and children, were butchered." That same year, a bill
commemorating the genocide was introduced in the U.S. Senate. But
Turkey responded by blocking U.S. Navy ships from entering
strategically important Turkish waters and by declaring a ban on
all U.S. military training operations on Turkish territory. The bill
quickly evaporated.

Last September, the matter came up again. The U.S. House Foreign
Relations Committee voted to bring a nonbinding resolution to the floor
of Congress condemning the mass murder of Armenians by Ottoman Turks,
placing the death toll at 1.5 million, and labeling the killing a
"genocide."

This time, Turkey responded by recalling its ambassador to the United
States and forecasting dire repercussions. "In the case that Armenian
allegations are accepted, there will be problems in the relations
between the two countries," warned Turkish President Abdullah Gul.

"Yesterday, some in Congress wanted to play hardball," said Egmen
Bagis, foreign policy advisor to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan. "I can assure you, Turkey knows how to play hardball."

The next day, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack apologized
to Turkey on behalf of the United States by issuing a statement
expressing "regret" for the committee’s actions, which, he cautioned,
"may do grave harm to U.S.-Turkish relations and to U.S. interests
in Europe and the Middle East."

Defense Secretary Robert Gates added his opposition to the resolution
and pointed out that 70% of the air cargo sent to U.S. forces in
Iraq and 30% of the fuel consumed by those forces is delivered via
Turkey. President Bush, perhaps forgetting his campaign promise in
2000 to push for official recognition of the Armenian genocide if
elected president, also came out against the resolution.

While Turkish officials made threats, lobbyists paid by Turkey
delivered money to congressmen in the form of campaign and political
action committee donations. Louisiana representative Bobby Jindal
(a Republican who’s now Louisiana’s governor) and Mississippi
representative Roger Wicker (now a Republican senator representing
that state) both dropped their sponsorship of the resolution and began
speaking against it — but only after receiving around $20,000 each
from former congressmen Bob Livingston, a Republican, and Richard
Gephardt, a Democrat, who now work for lobbying firms contracted by
Turkey to oppose any recognition of the Armenian genocide.

In 2000, while still in office, Gephardt had declared that he was
"committed to obtaining official U.S. government recognition of the
Armenian genocide." In 2003, he co-sponsored a resolution placing
"the Armenian genocide" in the company of the World War II Holocaust
and mass deaths in Cambodia and Rwanda that was voted down after a
Turkish lobbying blitzkrieg.

Since leaving office and accepting a $1.2 million-a-year contract to
lobby for Turkey, the former House majority leader has experienced
a profound change of heart. "Alienating Turkey through the passage
of the resolution could undermine our efforts to promote stability
in the theater of [Middle East] operations, if not exacerbate the
situation further," he wrote in an E-mail to the International Herald
Tribune. Last fall, as part of his efforts to help torpedo the symbolic
Armenian genocide resolution, Gephardt escorted Turkish Ambassador
Nabi Sensoy to meetings with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and
other Democratic leaders.

Bob Livingston, whose firm has been paid more than $12 million by
the Turkish government since 1999, also pitched in. As part of the
lobbying effort last fall that U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.),
one of the sponsors of the resolution, called "the most intense I’ve
ever seen," Livingston shepherded Turkish dignitaries from office to
office on Capitol Hill.

As another part of that campaign, the government of Turkey took
out full-page advertisements in major American newspapers calling
upon the members of Congress to "support efforts to examine history,
not legislate it." The ads featured a testimonial from Secretary of
State Condoleeza Rice — "These historical circumstances require a
very detailed and sober look from historians" — that implied that
historians have yet to seriously study the Armenian genocide.

More than 100 supporters of the resolution reversed their positions,
and H.R. 106 was voted down.

The government of Turkey has since continued to call for a "historian’s
commission" of scholars to "study the facts of what happened in
1915-1923." The proposed committee is marketed as a high-minded quest
for truth and reconciliation, a long overdue arbitration of disputed
history, and a chance to finally give equal weight to both sides of
the story.

But as the saying goes, a lie isn’t the other side of any story. It’s
just a lie.

"When it comes to the historical reality of the Armenian genocide,
there is no ‘Armenian’ or ‘Turkish’ side of the question, any more
than there is a ‘Jewish’ or ‘German’ side of the historical reality
of the Holocaust," writes Torben Jorgensen, of the Danish Center for
Holocaust and Genocide Studies. "There is a scientific side and an
unscientific side — acknowledgement or denial."

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/

Armenian-Turkish event in London

AZG Armenian Daily #103, 31/05/2008

Armenia-Turkey

ARMENIAN-TURKISH EVENT IN LONDON

With the help of Amnesty International NGO on June 19
will be held an event under heading "Turkey, Armenia
and protection of free speech" in London Modern Art
Institute.

Author of the book "My grandmother" Fitie Chetin will
participate in the event. In his book Fitie Chetin
reveals that his Muslim grandmother is an Armenian
Christian in reality.

Translator and writer Moran Frilin, Armenian writer
and film producer Noritza Matosian and well-known
Turkish dissident and publisher Ragup Charakolu will
also participate in the event, Noyan Tapan Agency
reported.

Translated by L.H.

Reported to PACE

Panorama.am

20:32 24/05/2008

REPORTED TO PACE

-Today we witness the simplest imitation of the
implementation of article 1609 recommended by PACE,-
said Norayr Norikyan, a member of -Alternative-
civil-political initiative. According to him the
authorities are intended to conduct some activities
before the general session of PACE on 23 June and ask
for some time to implement the other points till
Septembers.

-The ongoing authorities of Armenia can not implement
the demands of article 1609 if legal, moral, political
issues lack, they can not put under threat the
international image of Armenia and the political
perspectives of it,- he said.

Gerasim Barseghyan who was present at the press
conference also said that the Armenian authorities
will implement all the recommendations and that he
sees objective principles to it. He did not agree with
Norikyan that it is possible to get something from the
international institutions by lying.

Source: Panorama.am

Arion Theater To Represent Armenia At Prague Festival

ARION THEATER TO REPRESENT ARMENIA AT PRAGUE FESTIVAL

ARMENPRESS
May 22, 2008

YEREVAN, MAY 22, ARMENPRESS: An Armenian theater "Arion" will represent
the country at the 10-th theatrical festival "Apostrophe 2008" in
Prague, the Czech Republic, that will be held on June 27-July 2.

Gayane Durgarian, a press officer for the Armenian Ministry of Culture,
told Armenpress that the Armenian theater was included by the festival
organizers into the list of best ten participating companies. The
Armenian theater will stage a play called "Will you dance with me."

Some 70 theaters are expected to participate in the festival.

NKR President: New Essense To Be Attached To Country’s Political Lif

NKR PRESIDENT: NEW ESSENCE TO BE ATTACHED TO COUNTRY’S POLITICAL LIFE

DeFacto Agency
May 19 2008
Armenia

YEREVAN, 19.05.08. DE FACTO. The issues referring to the
Nagorno-Karabakh’s domestic and foreign policy were discussed in the
course of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic President Bako Sahakian’s
meeting with a new composition of the Artsakh’s Democratic Party
Central Committee held on May 17. Touching on internal political
atmosphere in the country the state’s head noted new essence should
be attached to the country’s political life to make it more valuable.

Speaking of the municipal elections Bako Sahakian approved the policy
of non-interference chosen by the Nagorno-Karabakh political parties.

In the course of the meeting the NKR President specially marked
priorities necessary for the country’s development. Bako Sahakian
peculiarly mentioned the issue of NKR’s international recognition.

Marat Musaelian, the Secretary of the NKR Security Council, was
present at the meeting.

National Assembly Again Revises Current Law On Meetings, Assemblies,

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY AGAIN REVISES CURRENT LAW ON MEETINGS, ASSEMBLIES, RALLIES AND DEMONSTRATIONS

Noyan Tapan

Ma y 19, 2008

YEREVAN, MAY 19, NOYAN TAPAN. The RA National Assembly on May 19
started discussing in the first reading the bill on amendments and
additions to the amended on March 17 RA Law on Conducting Meetings,
Assemblies, Rallies and Demonstrations. The bill was prepared by the NA
speaker Tigran Torosian based on the joint conclusion of the Council
of Europe Venice Commission and the OSCE/ODIHR and the provisions of
the memorandum adopted as a result of joint discussions of the above
mentioned structures and Armenian experts.

The bill, in particular, allows to conduct spontaneous mass public
events, but for a limited period of time – 6 hours. By the bill, any
following mass event regarding the same problem cannot be considered
spontaneous and shall be held in accordance with the procedure
that envisages notification of the mayor’s office. By the bill,
a spontaneous event is a peaceful public event, which has not been
announced beforehand and which requires an immediate response to a
concrete phenomenon or event.

The bill also invalidates the March 17 law’s provision, by which
"in case of mass public events’ turning into mass disorder which
has resulted in deaths, the authorized body – with the aim of
preventing new crimes, and if other preventive means are exhausted
– may temporarily ban the holding of mass public events until the
circumstances of the crime and the criminals are revealed".

Another proposed amendment establishes the right to dispute in court
a decision banning the holding of a mass public event. By the bill,
the court makes a decision within 24 hours. The court’s ruling to
invalidate a decision banning a mass public event takes effect from
the moment of the ruling’s publication.

The chairman of the NA Standing Committee on State and Legal Issues,
head of the Armenian delegation in the PACE David Harutyunian
underlined the importance of bringing the current law into line with
the European Convention on Human Rights and considered it crucial
"to give a civilized form to the law", especially as the Venice
Commission experts have expressed a positive opinion about the bill
under discussion.

"Heritage" faction was against the bill. In the opinion of its members,
the amendments proposed are of cosmetic character and are not aimed
at Armenia’s democratization. In their opinion, it is necessary to
return to the law in force before March 17 and to reject the current
amendments.

The representatives of the factions of the 4 parties forming the
political coalition spoke in support of the bill. At the same time the
newly elected head of ARF faction Vahan Hovhannisian said that the
positive position of their faction is conditioned by the fact that
on March 17 the parliament took "a step backward, and now by taking
half a step or 3/4 of a step", it tries to return to the law in effect
before March 17. In his words, if the indicated step backward had not
been taken, the PACE resolution 1609 about the state of democratic
institutions in Armenia would not have been so strict.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=113514

Saroyan was a pop-culture icon in heyday

New Zealand Press Association
May 17, 2008 Saturday

SAROYAN WAS A POP-CULTURE ICON IN HEYDAY

Fresno, California MCT – After his acclaimed first book of short
stories was published in 1934, William Saroyan sent a letter to Random
House asking: “Do you think it would help any if I was photographed
swinging on a trapeze?”

Saroyan knew how fame worked. At the peak of his renown, from 1939
through the early years of World War 2, he cosied up to America as a
celebrity who was equal parts literary giant and pop-culture icon.

This self-proclaimed “world’s best author,” who came to prominence
with his short story The Daring Young Man on the Flying Trapeze, was a
big deal in a way authors in our contemporary image-oriented society –
a culture tilted toward movies and television – can pretty much only
dream about.

Saroyan’s literary fame has not endured in the way his partisans might
have hoped. He is admired but not widely taught, and most of his
titles are hard to find in chain bookstores, even in his hometown of
Fresno in California. And his pop-culture fame, while perhaps more
lasting than the vapid notoriety bestowed by gossip outlets like TMZ
and People magazine, lacked staying power.

Keep in mind just how well-known this former unruly school kid was at
his peak. His publisher at the time, Bennett Cerf, dubbed him “the
wonder boy from Fresno”.

Even when he eloquently (and very publicly) showed disdain for the
trappings of fame – refusing to accept the Pulitzer Prize and the
$US1000 ($NZ1325) that went with it for his play The Time of Your Life
in 1940, for example – Saroyan gained more notoriety than if he’d
simply taken the money.

Saroyan liked to be recognised for his literary merits as the author
of such acclaimed works as The Human Comedy and My Name Is Aram. But
he also realised, living at a time when the names of serious writers
floated in conversations alongside those of movie stars and
socialites, that people gravitated to the whole William Saroyan
package. All of it added up: the dark and exotic good looks, the
fierce temperament, the loud voice, the stormy marriages and divorces,
the expensive tastes, the precarious finances. And especially the
muscular ego.

“Modesty,” he wrote, “almost invariably accompanies mediocrity and
is usually an inside-out variety of immodesty.”

When publishers wanted to tinker with his precious words, his first
inclination was to change publishers.

Saroyan wasn’t content just to have three plays open on Broadway in a
period of 13 months, as he did in 1939. He wanted to run the theatre,
too. He named it after himself, naturally. The Saroyan Theatre might
not have been the financial success that he’d hoped. But for a time,
he was known as the playwright who had wrested control from the
“money guys” and taken charge of his own destiny.

Saroyan’s desire for control extended to Hollywood, and there,
perhaps, he met his match. When he sold the script for A Human Comedy
to MGM for $US60,000 ($NZ79,595), he assumed he’d direct the movie as
well. The studio chief, Louis B Mayer, who had an even greater
reputation for obstinateness, didn’t agree.

Yet for all the ways that Saroyan burned bridges by alienating
publishers, theatre investors and movie moguls, his celebrated cocky
attitude helped define an image that endeared him to the public.

A 1940 article in Life magazine – one of the great arbiters of popular
culture at the time – painted a glowing portrait of a headstrong,
confident writer taking Broadway by storm.

The article repeated the oft-told anecdote about the publisher
Cerf. In 1934, while a guest at San Francisco’s Palace Hotel, Cerf was
informed that “a young man who says he is the world’s greatest author
is in the lobby.” Replied Cerf: “Tell Mr Saroyan to come right up.”

At the peak of his success, with My Name Is Aram a best-selling Book
of the Month Club selection and The Time of Your Life running
successfully on Broadway, Saroyan moved into a suite in the
prestigious Hampshire House Hotel overlooking Central Park, and for a
time, writes Saroyan scholar Brian Darwent, lived “the life of a
millionaire.”

Yet for much of his life, he struggled with debt and a nasty gambling
habit – which only added to his larger-than-life personality.

Key to Saroyan’s image is his humble beginnings in Fresno. He was the
first son in his family of Armenian immigrants born on American
soil. A writer with an outsized personal voice, he produced many works
drawing on his own experiences growing up in the Armenian section of
Fresno. It is in these glimpses of his hometown – of the old Armenian
Presbyterian Church, the Postal Telegraph office, the family house –
that readers came to feel that they knew not only the characters in
his stories but Saroyan himself.

Nothing captures that autobiographical flavour better than Saroyan’s
Homer Macauley, the schoolboy hero of The Human Comedy who made $US15
a week working 4 pm-midnight delivering telegrams. In Follow, you see
a slightly surlier – and more ethnic – interpretation of this
archetypal character in Aram Diranian, the unfulfilled telegraph
clerk.

Homer is youth itself, a ubiquitous folk character and something of a
priest flitting from one American town to the next, “a modern
American Mercury,” writes Saroyan scholar Alfred Kazin, “riding his
bike as Mercury ran on the winds, with a blue cap for an astral helmet
and a telegraph blank waving the great tidings in his hand.”

Yet this wind-riding boy grew up, slowed down, grew old.

Saroyan lived far beyond his relatively few years of intense favour in
the public spotlight. Critical tastes are hard to explain and even
harder to predict: Who can say why Saroyan doesn’t have the name
recognition today of, say, his contemporary John Steinbeck? There is
no arbitration board of literary reputation, no rules of fairness as
to why some authors go out of print and others have entire shelves at
Borders.

But Saroyan himself seemed to recognise the vagaries of fame.

The 1940 Life magazine article – which was not a cover story, showing
that even then there were limits on his celebrity – noted that since
becoming successful, Saroyan returned to Fresno on occasion.

There, the article went on to say, “he is amused by the fact that the
Armenian boys and girls he went to school with have no idea of his
fame. When they ask him what he’s doing there, Saroyan replies that he
is out of a job and `looking for work’.”

What he did with words was work, of course, and he knew it. The most
glorious kind of work: one in which you leave a mark. Although the
headlines and the space on bookstore shelves might diminish, the words
will always remain.

MCT cw

Hunger Striker Beaten

HUNGER-STRIKER BEATEN

A1+
[06:32 pm] 16 May, 2008

On May 15 Hrachia Sargsian, member of the political board of the Nor
Zhamanakner Party (NZhK), went on a hunger strike near the Office of
Prosecutor General. He had two demands: to provide medical aid to
the NZhK Leader Aram Karapetian who has got health problems and to
release him from the penitentiary.

On May 16 law enforcers "visited" Hrachia Sargsian.

They hit him, stole his shoes and dismantled the tent.

"I have been here since yesterday. I spent the night on a bench. It
is widely-accepted in the world that a hunger-striker may put up a
tent to have a rest. I had hardly lied down than law-enforcers came
and demanded me to take down the tent," Hrachia Sarkissian said to A1+.

I demanded to take Aram Karapetian to hospital and dismiss the criminal
case against him. My first demand was met. Today at about 1.00 some
policemen headed by Colonel Taron Baghdasarian forced me off the tent
taking away my belongings. They tore the tent, hit me on the legs and
hands. Five more women have joined the hunger-strike. We shall struggle
to the end. They cannot tear off my soul and mind like my shoes."

Newton’s David Boyajian recognized for role in countering denial

The Watertown Tab and Press
Watertown, MA
Tuesday May 13, 2008

Newton’s David Boyajian recognized for role in countering genocide denial

By James E. Walker

WATERTOWN – The Governor’s Council issued a resolution at the
Massachusetts State House on April 30 honoring Newton resident David
Boyajian for his role in the campaign against the Anti-Defamation
League’s denial of the Armenian Genocide and for questioning the
appropriateness of towns’ affiliation with the ADL’s No Place for Hate
anti-bias program.

The resolution was introduced by Marilyn Petitto Devaney, a Governor’s
Council member and Watertown Town Councilor.

The resolution cited Boyajian’s leadership in `successful efforts to
have communities sever ties with the ADL’s No Place for Hate and to
end the Massachusetts Municipal Association’s sponsorship’ of the
program. The resolution further described the ADL’s opposition to
Congressional affirmation of the Armenian Genocide as `depriving the
Armenians of their history.’

The ADL has yet to unambiguously acknowledge the genocide and has
opposed recognition of it by the U.S. Congress.

Boyajian, Armenian-Americans and human rights advocates have argued
that No Place for Hate’s human rights mission is incompatible with the
stance of the ADL on the widely recognized genocide committed against
Armenians by Turkey from 1915 to 1923.

Boyajian’s letter in the Watertown TAB on July 6, 2007, and his
subsequent activism sparked the issue, which soon became international
news.

In acceptance remarks, Boyajian thanked the Armenian National
Committee of America for its efforts in the campaign and praised `the
human rights commissioners, elected officials and citizens’ in the
towns that dropped No Place for Hate. Boyajian urged people to `strive
for consistency, not selectivity, in recognizing genocide and human
rights violations.’

He also thanked the people `even in other countries, of all ethnic,
religious and political backgrounds’ who supported the campaign to
censure the ADL.

Boyajian singled out `Jewish Americans who have stood for principle’
by criticizing the ADL `when they could have remained silent.’

He concluded by saying, `If you think you see injustice, speak
up. Individuals and organizations will hear you, and sometimes the
world may wind up being a better place because of it.’

About 50 people attended the proceedings, many of them
Armenian-Americans. A group of Wellesley High School political
science students on a field trip to the State House also
attended. Wellesley is affiliated with No Place for Hate.

Watertown decertified its No Place for Hate on Aug. 11, 2007. In the
months following, Arlington, Bedford, Belmont, Lexington, Medford,
Needham, Newburyport, Newton, Northampton, Peabody, Somerville and
Westwood followed suit.

The Massachusetts Municipal Association, the umbrella organization for
the state’s cities and towns, voted April 8 to cease its sponsorship
of all No Place for Hate programs. The program still exists, however,
in more than 40 Massachusetts municipalities and in several states,
including California, Colorado, New York, Pennsylvania and Texas.

The ADL established No Place for Hate in 1999 in Massachusetts towns
and owns the federal trademark for the program’s name.

On April 22, the Watertown Town Council issued a proclamation
sponsored by Council President Clyde Younger also honoring Boyajian
for his journalism and activism regarding genocide denial.

In a recent article in TAB newspapers, Boyajian called on Blue Cross
Blue Shield of Massachusetts to stop funding No Place for Hate and to
drop its designation as a No Place for Hate company.

Young People From Armenia In Karabakh

YOUNG PEOPLE FROM ARMENIA IN KARABAKH

KarabakhOpen
13-05-2008 11:32:19

Young people from Armenia arrived in Karabakh for a cognitive
visit. The purpose of the visit was to get in touch with their peers
in Karabakh. On May 11 the young people met with their peers in Hadrut
and talked about the post-election events in Armenia and the relations
between the Armenians of Armenia and Karabakh.

The impression was that the Armenians of Karabakh were to blame for the
events in Armenia, who tried to find excuses. With regard to the rule
of the so-called "Karabakh clan" one of the participants from Karabakh
said there are clans in other places, including in Azerbaijan where
"Nakhidjevanis" rule, including in Russia…

In answer to the question whether the special force of Karabakh
was deployed in Yerevan on March 1, one of the participants said in
Karabakh there is no special force, as to the troops, they control
the front line and they cannot do other work.

Some accuse the government, others accuse the opposition but everyone
thinks that in the end people suffered. The guests from Armenia think
the people of Karabakh are not to blame, and no groundless accusations
should be made.

There were also appeals to unite, not to divide into Armenians of
Karabakh and Armenia, not to go deep into who shoot at whom. For
tomorrow, if necessary arises, the people of Gyumri will again defend
Karabakh.

We could not imagine that such a thing is possible in Armenia. That
in Yerevan like in Tbilisi or other countries that TV reports they
could beat and even kill people. We were very much worried, said a
participant from Hadrut.

The meetings were highly useful. The young people not only learned
a lot of new things but also discussed important problems. It turned
out that many of them know little about Karabakh and the problem of
Karabakh, even the Karabakhis cannot explain where the talks have
arrived at. Apparently, it is all due to the passive information
policy.

The project was implemented by the Civil Society Institute Armenia
together with the resource center of Stepanakert. On May 12 the
participants of the project met with the minister of foreign affairs.